UAV "Joker-10" to enhance air defense

15
UAV "Joker-10" to enhance air defense
UAV of the Joker series with one of the combat load options


To combat enemy unmanned aerial vehicles, a variety of fire and radio equipment are used. The idea of ​​intercepting a UAV using another aircraft also has good prospects in this context. drone with appropriate flight characteristics and combat load. It was recently implemented in the Joker-10 FPV drone project, and now this product can hit both ground and air targets.



Unmanned interception


Let us remind you that the kamikaze drones of the “Joker” series are developed and produced by LLC “Center for Integrated Unmanned Solutions” (CDBR) from Zhukovsky (Moscow region). The first product of this line was presented less than a year ago, at the end of May 2023. Later they created and Several new UAVs of this kind have been brought into production. Thus, at the end of March they reported the appearance of the Joker-10 drone with advanced capabilities.

“Jokers” of all modifications are quadcopters with radio control and a heading camera. They have high flight characteristics for their class and can carry combat units. The first models of the family were intended to work against ground targets, and the latest project included new combat missions.

Reportedly, during the development of Joker-10, they thought through and implemented the possibility of attacking air targets - now the UAV can be used as an air defense weapon. For this purpose, a new special kind of combat load has been developed. The destruction of an air target is carried out by a stream of fragments from an unusual ammunition of its own design.


The interceptor drone has already been tested at the State Government Scientific Testing Site aviation systems and confirmed its characteristics. As part of the tests, aircraft-type UAVs were used as a training target. "Joker-10", under the control of a trained operator, successfully aimed at such a target and used a warhead. Using the combat load, the drone itself remained intact and remained stable.

The Central Design Bureau believes that the Joker-10 with an anti-aircraft load has great prospects and should interest customers, as well as find application at the front. Reportedly, some organizations have already paid attention to this development, and during recent tests their representatives mastered the technique.

Material part


Like other FPV drones, Joker-10 is distinguished by a certain simplicity of design. It is built according to the quadcopter scheme and is assembled from components available on the market and parts of our own production. The resulting aerial platform is capable of carrying up to 5 kg of payload. With a full load, the drone reaches speeds of up to 100 km/h, without a load - twice as much.

The Central Design Bureau has developed an updated UAV control system and included the so-called. hibernator If necessary, a drone in a combat position can go into standby mode and remain in place until the command to take off is received. The waiting time in summer reaches 1 month, in the cold season - up to 1 week. At the same time, it is extremely difficult to detect a “sleeping” UAV.


The Joker-10 kamikaze drone can carry different payload options. An original ammunition was created to combat air targets. It was made on the basis of a casing from an aviation decoy thermal target. Instead of a pyrotechnic composition, an explosive charge and ready-made destructive elements were placed in it. At the operator's command, ignition is produced and a shot is fired. The exact parameters of the ammunition have not yet been reported.

During recent tests, the Joker-10 UAV carried six such munitions. An experienced drone showed the possibility of using such a load without risking its own design. In addition, the shot did not disrupt stability and allowed the flight and missions to continue. After expending its ammunition, the UAV can perform a ramming attack.

As part of the air defense


Currently, anti-aircraft systems of various types, as well as electronic warfare systems, are used to combat enemy reconnaissance and attack UAVs. During the current Special Operation, air defense systems/air defense missile systems and electronic warfare are most clearly demonstrating their capabilities - Ukrainian formations are massively launching various UAVs, and only a few make it through our air defense.

According to the developers, the interceptor version of the Joker-10 product should complement traditional air defense systems. A drone in this configuration has several important features and advantages that will allow it to effectively hit unmanned aerial targets and contribute to military and facility air defense in general.


First of all, the Central CBD mentions the economic component. Enemy strike drones are often not sophisticated or expensive. Intercepting them requires spending more expensive anti-aircraft missiles, and the security of facilities is more expensive than it could be. The use of an anti-aircraft drone makes it possible to reduce the cost of interception to a minimum. Moreover, the price of one anti-aircraft missile is equivalent to the price of a sufficiently large number of UAVs.

FPV drones, which are based on racing designs, have high speed and maneuverability characteristics. Due to this, they are able to successfully target attack UAVs flying at a limited speed and unable to maneuver. However, the effectiveness of such guidance depends, first of all, on the operator’s skills. With all this, in terms of speed and maneuverability, the interceptor drone is inferior to anti-aircraft missiles - but their advantages in flight data are excessive when fighting most UAVs.

Both missiles and unmanned interceptors have a clear advantage over electronic warfare systems. Using interference, satellite navigation radio signals and UAV communication with the operator are suppressed. However, an air target can have inertial navigation and move along a predetermined route. In this case, she becomes immune to interference and can only be shot down.

Obviously, intercepting air targets using UAVs also has disadvantages. First of all, this is the limited flight range of an FPV drone. If he fails to meet or catch up with the target, the flight will fail. In addition, organizational issues arise. It is necessary to ensure monitoring of the airspace and issuing target designations to crews of unmanned interceptors. Perhaps these tasks will be solved using existing military air defense control systems.

Promising direction


In general, the idea of ​​using UAVs as an additional air defense system is logical and has certain prospects. At the same time, “Joker-10” from the Central Committee of the Russian Federation is not the only domestic development of this kind. Similar ideas are proposed by other organizations. In addition, the front carries out its own experiments and field tests.


In recent months, video recordings have repeatedly been received from the Special Operation zone showing the interception of enemy UAVs using drones. In these episodes, the target was usually large multicopters with limited flight capabilities, and they were defeated by lightweight, maneuverable FPV devices. The current project from the Central CBD develops similar ideas. At the same time, the necessary solutions are laid down already at the UAV development stage, which should provide certain advantages.

In the recent past, the Zala Aero company, which produces Lancet loitering ammunition, proposed the concept of the so-called. aerial mining. This idea involves UAV combat duty in a given area, monitoring the situation and searching for targets. When an air target is detected, the loitering munition must intercept. It was assumed that aerial mining would be effective against both full-fledged aviation and drones.

Thus, industry and troops already have developments on the topic of interceptor drones and are ready to implement them, as well as bring them to practical use. If production and supply problems are successfully solved, troops will be able to receive massive and fairly simple air defense systems of a fundamentally new type.

It is obvious that interceptor drones cannot solve all air defense tasks, and systems of other classes should remain in the army. However, the simultaneous use of existing and future radars, air defense systems, air defense systems and electronic warfare systems together with UAVs should provide an increase in the effectiveness of air defense in a number of typical situations.

Whether our army will take advantage of the opportunity that has arisen, and how exactly new means can be introduced, time will tell. Also in the future it will become clear how effective Joker-10 with special anti-aircraft ammunition is in a real situation.
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    April 9 2024 07: 38
    1. It is necessary to form at least air defense regiments with UAV fighters.
    2. All UAV fighters need to be integrated into a single network.
    3. Online image analysis is carried out using AI for quick response.
    1. +2
      April 9 2024 09: 02
      That's exactly the problem with AI.
      1. 0
        April 9 2024 09: 14
        Quote: bug120560
        That's exactly the problem with AI.

        You'll have to look for people
        1. 0
          April 9 2024 09: 30
          You'll have to look for people
          Somehow it’s not comme il faut, they laughed at them for two years since they all quickly left.
    2. +1
      April 9 2024 12: 39
      More than half of real scientists believe that there is no AI yet. There are modern self-propelled guns with a set of programs and a perfect algorithm for selecting them for the current situation. There is no generally accepted definition of AI in the scientific community and there is no common understanding. This is for starters.
      In a modern army, drones - kamikades - are not needed in such numbers; they are a backup weapon and should not be so numerous. It’s just that two backward armies are fighting in the Northern Military District in terms of modern tactics and capabilities... And it’s not at all clear what experience can be drawn from this mess... Someone sees new trends and analyzes experience. There is no experience or new trends in the Northern Military District and all this was known more than 30 years ago, and the level of combat operations in the Northern Military District is still far from what is needed... The Russian Armed Forces almost completely lack real-time reconnaissance technical means with the ability to transmit the necessary flows information. This applies to satellite reconnaissance and channels, aviation assets, including UAVs, radars, video channels...
      This situation leads to the development of situational solutions and directions for the development of military equipment, which in the future, or more precisely, in modern warfare, will be unclaimed and largely useless...
      1. 0
        April 10 2024 09: 23
        drones are not needed and all advanced armies are adopting experience and increasing the production of drones
    3. +1
      April 10 2024 09: 15
      Quote: Civil
      1. It is necessary to form at least air defense regiments with UAV fighters.
      2. All UAV fighters need to be integrated into a single network.
      3. Online image analysis is carried out using AI for quick response.

      More precisely, a network of AWACS balloons with platforms for interceptor UAVs.
    4. +1
      April 19 2024 18: 53
      Well, regiments are probably cool, but separate UAV battalions with a company with lancets, and 2 companies of FVP drones, one of which specializes in fighters, but can perform different tasks - this is reasonable. One such battalion can significantly change the situation on an important sector of the front, and if, in addition to individual battalions, such battalions are eventually formed in each division as a means of reinforcement... Oh dreams...
  2. AMG
    0
    April 9 2024 07: 54
    But time will tell! And in the future it will become clear. We'll live to see the future.
  3. 0
    April 9 2024 09: 17
    Quote: Civil
    1. It is necessary to form at least air defense regiments with UAV fighters.


    I doubt. It will most likely be the lowest level of air defense (“trench”). But it must be informationally integrated into the “big” system. Timely detection and targeting of an enemy drone is the key to success and long life. wink
    So we should expect the creation of drone detection tools and information support and target designation systems. Without them, air defense drones will not be effective. It's like a machine gun without a sight; you can shoot, but only at point-blank range.
  4. +5
    April 9 2024 12: 35
    Good time. First read the tactics of using UAVs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and you will understand right now that it is necessary to mass produce and supply such UAVs. Everything else must be finalized during production. Our losses from enemy UAVs are enormous and there is no effective method of fighting yet. Yes, in the future we need the integration of all air defense systems, Aerospace forces, electronic warfare, ground units are a whole, but air defense drones are now needed as ammunition for weapons.
  5. +1
    April 9 2024 12: 50
    And what’s also important is that this article and idea at the same time can be very quickly used by the enemy.
  6. 0
    April 9 2024 19: 31
    I would like to insert my twenty cents:
    1. Use destructive elements in the form of reels with a long enough fishing line, which will allow you not to destroy the drone, but only to immobilize it (what if it turns out that you can interrogate someone else, torture, convert... if possible). Is the idea clear?
    2. In hibernation mode, add a software module for identifying contrasting targets in the sky, then you can implement the idea of ​​​​anti-drone mining of the area with a limited number of operators. Is the idea clear?
  7. BAI
    +1
    April 9 2024 20: 51
    Drones are following the path of aviation. First, reconnaissance aircraft and bombers appeared there (at least for the tasks being solved), then fighters.
    UAVs have reconnaissance and attack drones first. And then the fighters began to arrive
  8. 0
    April 19 2024 19: 28
    We need copters like this. I have long proposed the idea of ​​a copter with a “net” and I see that the idea as a whole has been implemented.
    But fighting drones by destroying them is akin to fighting windmills. If there is political will, they can actually be riveted in millions of copies. First of all, it is necessary to increase capabilities and allocate separate forces for the task of identifying and destroying operators. You can’t rivet them in the millions. There must be specialists who have the necessary technical means who will identify and hit UAV operators, and, if necessary, direct additional weapons at them to destroy the units in whose interests they work. It is the creation of small but well-equipped units of “drone hunters” that should give maximum results. Moreover, such units should be of 2 levels, this is the tactical one, which will hunt by the operators of copters and loitering ammunition, and the operational one, which will hunt the operators of “martyrs” and “bayraktars”. These will be different people, with different capabilities, but they must be. The global level is at the level of the General Staff and conditionally fronts, the tactical level is at the level of armies and corps and gradually decreases to the division-brigade level.