Long-range radar patrol aircraft of Chinese naval aviation

34
Long-range radar patrol aircraft of Chinese naval aviation

In the late 1990s, the PLA command came to the conclusion that it was necessary to have long-range radar patrol aircraft in the Air Force's combat strength. To this end, a Chinese-Russian-Israeli consortium was created in 1997, the goal of which was to create an aviation complex for early warning and control.

The contractors were the Israeli company Elta and the Russian TANTK named after. G. M. Berieva. The Russian side took upon itself the preparation for the conversion of the serial A-50 from the one transferred from the Russian Ministry of Defense, and the Israelis undertook to install the EL/M-205 Phalcoon radar on it. However, under pressure from the United States, the Israeli side in 2000 announced its withdrawal from the program with a high degree of readiness of the lead aircraft.




However, before this, specialists from the Middle Kingdom managed to gain access to materials relating to the Israeli radar complex, so Israel’s refusal to cooperate with China did not greatly affect the pace of creation of the Chinese flying radar picket, and already in 2004, trial operation of the first AWACS aircraft began KJ-2000. In total, the PLA Air Force received four such aircraft; the last aircraft of this type was delivered to the customer in 2008.

The KJ-2000 AWACS aircraft were built on the basis of the Russian military transport Il-76TD and were equipped with a Chinese radio-technical complex, which largely repeated Israeli developments.


By the standards of twenty years ago, the equipment installed on board the KJ-2000 had quite good capabilities. A radar with an AFAR in a fixed mushroom-shaped fairing provided detection of high-altitude objects at a distance of more than 400 km and could simultaneously track 100 targets. In terms of detection range and the number of simultaneously tracked targets, the radar complex of the Chinese “Eye of Heaven” approximately corresponded to the characteristics of the RTK of the A-50 aircraft.

For its time, communications and navigation equipment was quite advanced, and radar information was displayed on color LCD monitors. Chinese media claim that one KJ-2000 is capable of simultaneously controlling the actions of several dozen combat aircraft.

Unlike the A-50, which Russia inherited from the USSR, the Chinese KJ-2000 did not stand idle at the airfield and actively participated in various exercises, in testing new missiles and combat aircraft, and also patrolled the airspace along the Formosa Strait and border areas with India. and Vietnam. In the intervals between exercises, tests and patrols, the AWACS aircraft underwent maintenance, repair and minor modernization at the Xi'an Aircraft Company (XAC) aircraft manufacturing facility in Xi'an.

Soon after the entry into service of four KJ-2000, Chinese representatives expressed interest in purchasing an additional batch of improved Il-76MD-90A with PS-90A3 engines for the construction of airborne radar posts, with improved avionics and electronic reconnaissance equipment. However, everything came down to the lack of new basic aircraft, which were not assembled in Russia in those years, and the customer refused to purchase used transport aircraft from the Russian Air Force.

The first Chinese production AWACS aircraft became milestone machines for the PLA Air Force, which allowed them to accumulate the necessary experience and develop application methods. Currently, the KJ-2000 has exhausted its service life and is being replaced by new Chinese AWACS aircraft.

Having analyzed the operation statistics of the KJ-2000, Chinese military analysts came to the conclusion that this heavy vehicle is suboptimal in terms of cost-effectiveness. The AWACS aircraft, created on the basis of a heavy jet transport aircraft, was too expensive, had low fuel efficiency and placed stringent requirements on home airfields. Experts decided that a middle-class aircraft with economical turboprop engines would be much more preferable for conducting regular patrols. Taking into account the cost of the base machine and the dimensions of the radio engineering complex, the search for the optimal option began. The military transport Y-8 (a copy of the An-12) and its improved version, the Y-9, were considered a suitable platform.

DRLO KJ-200 aircraft


Even before the commissioning of the first “strategic” AWACS aircraft based on the Il-76TD, work began in the PRC on the creation of a relatively inexpensive turboprop “tactical” flying radar post. The head prototype of the KJ-200 aircraft, built on the basis of the military transport Y-8F-200, took off on November 8, 2001.


Like the “strategic” KJ-2000 AWACS aircraft, the KJ-200 “tactical” airborne radar picket uses a radar with a fixed AFAR. However, instead of a round dish-shaped radome, inside of which three fixed antenna modules with a field of view of 120° each are installed, the KJ-200 aircraft uses an antenna in an elongated radome.

Externally, the KJ-200 radar resembles the Swedish Ericsson PS-890 radar, but the Chinese station is much larger. The active transceiver modules are cooled by an incoming air flow, for which there is an air intake in the front part of the radio-transparent fairing. Since the radar viewing angle on each side is 150°, there are “dead” areas that cannot be viewed in the nose and tail of the aircraft. This forces them to patrol in pairs or constantly fly in an “oval” or “figure eight”. But during these maneuvers there is a possibility that target tracking will be lost. At the same time, foreign experts note that compared to the Saab 340 and Saab 2000 platforms with radars of a similar type, the Y-8 airframe provides large areas for the installation of electronic equipment, operator consoles and personnel rest areas.

In January 2005, the second prototype, built on the basis of the modernized military transport Y-8F-600, took off. This machine was actually pre-production, had new, more economical Pratt & Whitney Canada PW150B engines with 6-bladed propellers and a “glass” cockpit with avionics from Honeywell.

In June 2006, the second prototype crashed due to icing, which seriously delayed the KJ-200's adoption into service. After an investigation into the causes of the disaster, changes were made to the wing design and tail unit.

The KJ-200 “tactical” radar patrol aircraft officially entered service in 2009. A total of 9 production copies were built. Military tests of three KJ-200s began even before the official adoption of the aircraft.


Google Earth satellite image: KJ-2000 and KJ-200 aircraft at an air base in the vicinity of Beijing, the image was taken in August 2009

During testing, turboprop AWACS aircraft were compared with heavy KJ-2000. The tests quite predictably showed that in terms of the capabilities of detecting air targets, processing and transmitting information, the KJ-200 airborne radio complex is noticeably inferior in terms of performance to the KJ-2000. At the same time, the turboprop KJ-200 was significantly easier to maintain and had much lower operating costs. An important factor was that preparation for the re-flight of the KJ-200 took 60% less time, and after fine-tuning, the reliability of less complex avionics, built mainly on the element base produced in the PRC, turned out to be higher.

The Chinese media published the following data for the KJ-200: maximum take-off weight is 61 kg, maximum speed is 000 km/h, ceiling is 660 meters, crew is 10 people. With a fuel reserve of 400 tons, the aircraft can stay in the air for 10 hours more than the KJ-25.

The radar is capable of detecting high-altitude targets at a distance of 350-400 km. The detection range of a target against the background of the ground is significantly less. Information about the air situation is transmitted to consumers via radio channel. Operators on board the KJ-200 can simultaneously control the actions of 12-15 interceptors. At the first stage, there was no opportunity to drop radar information in real time to the command posts of ground-based air defense forces and guidance points for fighter-interceptors.


Chinese maritime aviation experienced an urgent need for a long-range radar detection aircraft, which was also capable of tracking surface targets. As a result, the production KJ-200s were divided with the PLA Air Force in a ratio of 2 to 1, and the admirals received three AWACS aircraft. However, later, after the appearance of more advanced KJ-500 aircraft, another KJ-200 was transferred to naval aviation.


Google Earth satellite image: KJ-200 aircraft at Laiyang Air Base

Fleet KJ-200 radar patrol aircraft are assigned to Laiyang air bases in Shandong, Yalayshi and Lingshui on Hainan Island, which also host new KJ-500 AWACS, reconnaissance, patrol and anti-submarine aircraft: Y-8G, Y-8X, Y-8J and Y-8Q. All these vehicles are used to patrol the sea area adjacent to the Chinese coast, conduct reconnaissance at a great distance from the Chinese mainland, and fly over the disputed islands in the South China Sea.

DRLO KJ-500 aircraft


In general, the experience of creating the KJ-200 medium-sized AWACS aircraft turned out to be successful, but the Chinese military was not satisfied with the presence of dead zones due to the design of the radar. The experience gained by the developers and flight technical personnel of the combat units made it possible to form an understanding of what a modern “tactical level” radar patrol and control aircraft should be like, and to begin creating more advanced machines of this class.

According to the views of the PLA command, an AWACS aircraft operating for a long time at a considerable distance from its base must have an all-round radar, an in-flight refueling system and a wide range of electronic reconnaissance, data transmission and jamming equipment.

In accordance with these requirements, the KJ-9 was designed on the basis of the military transport Y-8 (an extended version of the Y-500 with new engines and avionics), the tests of which became known in early 2014. In 2018, it was announced that the KJ-500 aircraft had reached “full combat readiness.”

Unlike the KJ-200 with a “log-shaped” radar radome, the new aircraft has a round fixed radar antenna on the dorsal pylon.


Also, external features of the KJ-500 are the presence of an aerodynamic ridge in the tail section to compensate for the loss of directional stability and flat antennas of a radio reconnaissance station. On the fixed radar radome of the Chinese AWACS aircraft, the viewing sectors of the AFAR emitters are indicated on top and there is a characteristic “blister” of the satellite communication antenna.


The great success of CETC Corporation specialists is the transition from radars with mechanically scanned antennas to systems with an active phased array antenna. The People's Republic of China managed to create and put into mass production a three-dimensional early warning radar with an AFAR, which provides electronic scanning in altitude and azimuth. In this case, the viewing sector of each of the three flat antenna arrays, docked in the shape of an isosceles triangle, is at least 140°. Thus, they mutually overlap adjacent sectors and provide all-round visibility. The presence of an electronic reconnaissance station with flat antennas in the rear part of the fuselage significantly expands the aircraft’s field of application.

The characteristics of the KJ-500 were not disclosed. Experts believe that the take-off weight is within 62 tons. Maximum flight speed is up to 660 km/h, cruising speed is 550 km/h, service ceiling is 10 m, maximum flight duration is approximately 400 hours, maximum ferry range is 10 km. The KJ-5600 radar is close in its capabilities to the radar of the American carrier-based Grumman E-500D Hawkeye AWACS aircraft, and the MiG-2 fighter flying at an altitude of 21 m can be detected at a distance of more than 8000 km, but the capabilities of the electronic reconnaissance complex of the Chinese aircraft are higher .


Google Earth satellite image: parking of finished products at the factory airfield in Hanzhong

Serial construction of basic aircraft for the KJ-500 is carried out at the Shaanxi Aircraft Corporation (a subsidiary of the state-owned holding company AVIC) in the city of Hanzhong, Shenxi Province.


Google Earth satellite image: KJ-500 and N-6 aircraft at the factory airfield in Xi’an

Aircraft built in Hanzhong are transported to an aircraft factory in Xi'an, where the equipment is installed and put into operation. After which the new machines are handed over to the customer.


Google Earth satellite image: KJ-500 aircraft at Lingshui Air Base

As of 2023, Chinese industry has produced at least 35 KJ-500 aircraft. The PLA naval aviation has 14 vehicles of this type, which are based at the same airfields as its predecessors, the KJ-200.


Google Earth satellite image: KJ-500 aircraft on Woody Island

KJ-500s also carry out long patrol flights away from their coasts. Aircraft of this type have been repeatedly spotted at the air base located on Woody Island in the South China Sea.

Y-8G long-range radar reconnaissance aircraft


Unique to Chinese naval aviation is the Y-8G aircraft, which entered service in 2005. A total of four such machines were built, one of them is part of the naval aviation. According to US data, the Navy's Y-8G is permanently based at the PLA Laiyang Naval Air Base in Shandong Province.


The Y-8G is based on the modernized Y-8F-400 transport aircraft, and is easily distinguished from other aircraft based on Chinese versions of the An-12 by the bulging antennas protruding from the sides between the cockpit and the wings. In order to mount them, the front part of the fuselage had to be redone.

The antennas protruding from the sides are designed for long-range radar reconnaissance of water and land surfaces over a long distance. The Y-8G is also equipped with powerful electronic warfare stations with antennas located on the top of the fin and in the tail of the aircraft.


Google Earth satellite image: Y-8G aircraft on Woody Island

Just like J-11 fighters, H-6 bombers, Y-9Q anti-submarine aircraft, KJ-500 AWACS, the Y-8G radar reconnaissance aircraft regularly makes intermediate landings on Woody Island.

Carrier-based AWACS aircraft KJ-600


Initially, it was planned to include the Ka-31 and Z-18J radar patrol helicopters in the air wing of the first Chinese aircraft carrier Liaoning. However, having tested AWACS helicopters in action, Chinese naval commanders decided that, due to their insufficient range, low flight altitude and weak radio engineering complex, they were not capable of fully providing long-range patrols, timely warning and control of the actions of carrier-based fighters.

Practical work on the creation of a carrier-based AWACS aircraft in China began more than 15 years ago. In 2011, testing began on the experimental prototype JZY-01, built by the Xi'an Aircraft Company based on the Y-7 transport aircraft (a copy of the An-26). A total of two prototype aircraft were made.


These aircraft were not intended for testing on an aircraft carrier. The vehicle was too large and did not have a folding wing, brake landing hook or reinforced landing gear. In addition, a very heavy aircraft could not take off from the deck of an aircraft carrier without the use of a catapult or solid rocket boosters. Apparently, the JZY-01 experimental aircraft were used to test the radio-technical complex and test layout and aerodynamic solutions.


In 2017, it became known about the testing of the new carrier-based AWACS aircraft KJ-600, but not very clear photographs of the machine in the air appeared relatively recently. Judging by satellite imagery, at least four KJ-2023s were built by mid-600.


Google Earth satellite image: KJ-600, KJ-500 and Y-8 aircraft at the test parking lot of the factory airfield in Xi'an

The geometric dimensions of the Chinese carrier-based AWACS aircraft are close to the dimensions of the American E-2 Hawkeye, and the folding wing allows the KJ-600 to be compactly placed in the internal compartments of an aircraft carrier and the aircraft to be lifted using elevators. When designing the KJ-600, new composite materials were actively used, which made it possible to achieve high weight perfection and increase the service life of the airframe, which experiences increased loads when landing on the deck.

The network provides the following estimated characteristics of the KJ-600: aircraft length is about 18 m, wingspan is no more than 24 m (must fold at least 25% of the wing length), the height of the upper plane of the radar radome is 6 m, the diameter of the radar antenna radome is not more than 7 m. With such dimensions, the maximum take-off weight of the aircraft should not exceed 35 tons. The maximum fuel supply is up to 6 tons. Crew: 5-6 people. Maximum flight speed is up to 700 km/h. For patrolling at medium altitudes, the duration of stay in the air is 6-7 hours, and when flying at low and extremely low altitudes, the flight duration is no more than 5 hours.

Chinese sources claim that the basis of the radio engineering complex is the KLC-7 radar with AFAR, consisting of two sets. To increase noise immunity, the station simultaneously operates in two bands and performs both electronic and mechanical scanning of air and water space. It is possible to detect and simultaneously track more than 100 air targets, including such as anti-ship cruise missiles. At a flight altitude of 11 m, the KLC-000 airborne radar is capable of seeing large air objects at a range of up to 7 km. When decreasing to 550 m, the maximum detection range will decrease to 6000 km.


The KJ-600 airframes are assembled at the Shaanxi Aircraft Corporation in Hanzhong. Equipping with electronic equipment and factory testing of carrier-based AWACS aircraft are carried out at the Xi'an Aircraft Company in Xi'an.


Satellite image of Google Earth: carrier-based AWACS KJ-600 aircraft, H-6 bomber and military transport Y-20 at the finished products parking lot of the factory airfield in Xi'an

Taking into account the fact that Chinese naval commanders plan to have four aircraft carriers, 10-12 radar patrol vehicles will be required to staff their air wings. Another 2-3 aircraft will be needed to train flight and technical personnel, as well as to create an operational reserve. The Chinese aviation industry can deliver such a number of KJ-600 aircraft in 2-3 years.

In terms of the number of capable long-range radar patrol aircraft in service, China is already several times greater than Russia. At the same time, the PRC places emphasis on the construction of relatively cost-effective “medium” airborne radar posts. Aircraft designed for the “tactical” level are, if necessary, capable of performing “strategic” missions. While losing to the Russian A-50U in terms of flight speed, number of tracked targets and guided fighters, turboprops with almost the same flight range can “hang” in the air longer. The lower performance of the RTK is fully compensated by the large number of “tactical” AWACS aircraft available in China. Separately, it is worth noting the creation and launch into production of a carrier-based AWACS aircraft, which will certainly expand the combat potential of the PLA Navy aviation.

Продолжение следует ...
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    April 4 2024 05: 07
    military transport Y-8 (copy of An-12)
    This is what always amuses me about the Chinese! wink
    1. +10
      April 4 2024 09: 23
      Quote: Dutchman Michel
      military transport Y-8 (copy of An-12)

      So this is just normal - take and apply everything that is possible and possible. Moreover, the one-year-old An-12 American S-130 “Hercules” is still flying and being built, and no one is in a hurry to abandon it.
      And we have grief in the Military Air Transport Association - we can’t get a medium transport aircraft with a payload capacity of 12-20-25 tons to replace the already decrepit An-30. There is no one to even take on the IL-276 for development; there were also no other available design personnel. And the concept is kind of wild - take it out and give it... a turbojet aircraft... so that it lands on the ground, and is convenient to operate, and reliable and... economical.
      And why the hell then should it be a turbojet??
      Anachronism?
      And the fact that the ancient, but still legendary NK-12 is to this day two times more economical than the most modern high-bypass ratio turbofan engines, HOW? Doesn't count. And Tu-95SMS still fly at the speed of jet transport aircraft. They only consume half as much fuel. And no restrictions (for engines) when taking off/landing from the ground (for transport workers, of course).
      So they would take the modernized An-12 fuselage with all the modern stuffing, and supply it with two NK-12s. And it would turn out to be just a wonderful aircraft for the BTA - economical, reliable, for any runway, including. unpaved, with a load capacity of about 25 tons. What else is needed for happiness?
      What if you still get nasty and dirty the engine? Or rather its screws?
      So this will turn out to be the already unsurpassed NK-93, which in tests produced 20 t.p. instead of the expected 18 t.p. bully And what could be better? For VTA aircraft?
      But we look at how the Chinese are assembling our good old An-12 from the 50s... and... belay are we jealous?
      Maybe Manturov should just not be included in the next government? A ?
      Don’t even shoot him for murdering almost our entire industry (aircraft, shipbuilding, engine, machine tool and other engineering industries), but simply send him to ... retirement. A ?
      Even with the Golden Parachute.
      Otherwise, you won’t be able to build any airplanes with such a whack.
      1. +3
        April 4 2024 21: 54
        Yes, you understand everything and you can simply answer, you can’t criticize the Lao Defense Ministry, you can’t, you can’t, you can’t. What did the leaders do to prevent such thoughts from popping into my head? Nothing ! The entire budget is kickbacks. In our country they do not choose from the best, but for other reasons. If positions are passed on by inheritance or through connections. Much can be modernized. But when cutting, everything related to modernization is a drop in the bucket, but if it’s from scratch, then yes. There is no punishment, I don’t want to steal, well, he’ll serve time and get out under an amnesty and with money. Business, nothing personal. But they would have punished him and his relatives and neighbors, maybe they would have thought...
    2. +4
      April 4 2024 09: 31
      Another thing amuses me - China still produces them, but they stopped them in the USSR....and haven’t replaced them with anything. And this is a common transporter size
      1. +7
        April 4 2024 10: 30
        Quote: Zaurbek
        They stopped it back in the USSR...and didn’t replace it with anything.

        In the USSR they would have replaced it, but... We couldn’t replace the USSR and we still can’t, so... The Chinese were less global (in the sense of replacing aircraft with new ones) and did not touch the established production of the An-12 , got by with (permanent) modernization, but what
        built on the basis of the modernized military transport Y-8F-600. This machine was actually pre-production, had new, more economical Pratt & Whitney Canada PW150B engines with 6-blade propellers and a “glass” cockpit with avionics from Honeywell.
        This is what is in the article, I think there are more innovations there. And as a result, we will maintain a streamlined production process.
        As of 2023, Chinese industry has produced at least 35 aircraft KJ-500
        which, in comparison with our breakthrough, unparalleled successes in this industry, causes natural envy.
        1. +2
          April 4 2024 10: 32
          They wanted to change the An12 to the An70.... but the An12 standard size itself does not lose its relevance... the S130 is still made
          1. +5
            April 4 2024 10: 37
            Quote: Zaurbek
            They wanted to change the An12 to the An70.... but the An12 standard size itself does not lose its relevance... the S130 is still made

            That's what we're talking about, the fact that it has been flying for 50 years is not a criterion, those that were produced 50 years ago have long been retired, but the model itself is relevant and, just like in China, the An-12 and S-130 have already gone far in equipment, equipment, etc. from those 50 years ago.
            1. +1
              April 4 2024 10: 47
              Just why was the an12 discontinued, given that the 70ka was very far from the series.... in fact, both the an8 and the unified an12 were discontinued... without replacing them with anything
              1. 0
                April 5 2024 01: 41
                Quote: Zaurbek
                why was the an12 discontinued, given that the 70ka was very far from the series...

                In the 80s and early 90s, the An-12 fleet was still quite in good shape, and serial production of the An-70 was planned for the mid-90s, so everything was fine and was planned in the USSR on time. The key feature of the An-70 was its engines, which were supposed to be used for the carrier-based AWACS aircraft from the Yakovlev Design Bureau. . . By the way, the engines turned out to be seriously more powerful than expected... which is why they decided to make the An-70 itself compatible with four such engines, and the fuselage cross-section is even larger than that of the Il-76. But in the 90s, the Russian Federation, and especially used ones, no longer had time for the An-70. And although the development of the An-70 continued in the late 00s and early 10s and even prepared an assembly line for them in Ulyanovsk... the matter did not work out. The USA xoxL@m was not allowed. And in Ulyanovsk they resumed (but how long and crookedly!) the assembly of the Il-76MD90A.
                And the An-12 niche again turned out to be unfilled.
                And there is simply no one to develop a new car of this class.
                Who is good?
                Manturov "well done"
                1. +1
                  April 5 2024 09: 35
                  I think not Manturov. 80-90 and a lot of people got lost and it’s difficult to transfer from one plant to another and the customer didn’t have money.... here even with the An140 and 158 they couldn’t give any sense. And here is a new transporter with new engines. It’s good that the Il76 was moved and modernized.
                  1. +2
                    April 5 2024 11: 34
                    Quote: Zaurbek
                    here, even with An140 and 158, they couldn’t give us any sense.

                    Assembly in the Russian Federation under license and in cooperation with Antonov. After the contracts were broken and the cooperation was withdrawn, the work was stopped and, RECOGNIZING copyright, they DARE NOT simply localize production at home. And there was no main thing for this - engines. And since now the engines have appeared, there is a desire, opportunities, and an order. Since 124, there has been a lot of talk about the need for localization and independent construction of the An-2015, and passions have been running high. Someone suggested hanging as many as six PS-90A engines for him, there was a desire to use a new engine for the PAK DA NK-23T, but it all ended with a banal copy-paste of the D-18. And as soon as the engine appeared, it immediately became possible for all the “Ruslans” to return to service, while the engines were still waiting for the resumption of their production in the An-124M modification. I hope they can handle it now.
                    Quote: Zaurbek
                    And here is a new transporter with new engines.

                    Well, what’s new if it’s still the same magnificent An-72? Just under a new brand, so that there are fewer questions and problems.
                    And the engine there is only half new - only in the hot part, but the cold part remains the same as ours (which was built for Shafran). To begin with, they can generally take an old airframe from the An-72, attach new engines to it, slightly update the avionics, and go for testing. Show the picture there on TV. And then, using reverse engineering, we resume the assembly of the aircraft beloved by many. I remember “Cheburashka” when it was still undergoing testing. When we saw him, without saying a word, we nicknamed him Cheburashka. Then the nickname became official.
                    Quote: Zaurbek
                    It’s good that the Il76 was moved and modernized.

                    The Il-76MD90A modification was assembled in Tashkent, and at least one was delivered to Azerbaijan. But in Ulyanovsk they could not begin assembling them for a very long time. Everyone distinguished themselves - from the Moscow Region, with the price set below cost and the requirement to take out commercial loans to fulfill the order, to Manturov with his Ministry of Industry and Trade, which not only did not care about this, but also deliberate sabotage took place.
  2. +10
    April 4 2024 05: 08
    The Chinese comrades worked and are working, sticking to their line... But “we” have the largest yachts, we had... (sarcasm)
    1. +3
      April 4 2024 10: 34
      China does everything...and the entire component base. With sanctions such as those with the Russian Federation, only the PRC can make Avax..... leaders in this industry such as Israel, the USA, Sweden do not have such localization
      1. +2
        April 4 2024 10: 55
        Quote: Zaurbek
        With sanctions such as those with the Russian Federation

        ctions... The fact that the production of the element base from 90 was successfully screwed up, this is “but the largest yachts.”
      2. +4
        April 4 2024 16: 40
        A bad dancer's balls get in the way. Until 22, there were no serious sanctions, what prevented development?
        1. 0
          April 5 2024 09: 38
          The attitude towards AWACS in the USSR (in good times) was different from NATO...
    2. 0
      April 6 2024 18: 15
      Why were these yachts? They are not based in Crimea and do not carry out combat missions, which means they do not suffer losses.
      1. 0
        April 6 2024 18: 45
        Quote: Vladimir Yurievich
        Why were these yachts?

        They were with “us”, now they are not even formally with “us”, that’s what I’m talking about.
  3. +10
    April 4 2024 05: 16
    The Chinese are great, they are consistently improving their combat aviation and air defense forces. New models adopted for service become known when they actually enter service, and this is not announced ahead of time.
    1. +8
      April 4 2024 05: 26
      New models adopted for service become known when they actually enter service, and this is not announced ahead of time.

      As far as I remember, they can get you the death penalty for corruption fraud. Here... it’s better for me to remain silent.
      Thank you very much to Sergei for continuing the topic!
  4. +3
    April 4 2024 09: 13
    One can only envy the Chinese comrades.
  5. +3
    April 4 2024 13: 56
    hi
    As always, an interesting article!
    “According to the views of the PLA command, an AWACS aircraft operating for a long time at a considerable distance from its base must have an all-round radar, an in-flight refueling system and a wide range of electronic reconnaissance, data transmission and jamming equipment.”
    Here in the video you can clearly see the refueling rod, IMHO

    https://youtu.be/4Wqrk8Ah0JE

    By the way, China still has issues with air tankers, IMHO, but Yu20 will solve them.

    IMHO, again, but China’s turboprop AWACS are also a necessary measure until their long-range aircraft is completed.

    And a little about the plant:

    https://youtu.be/qYtzFOZIhE0
  6. +2
    April 4 2024 16: 59
  7. +3
    April 4 2024 17: 09
    The article is to put pressure on the calluses of the “urapatriots” and “guardians” wassat
    1. +3
      April 4 2024 20: 11
      Quote: Mekey Iptyshev
      The article is to put pressure on the calluses of the “urapatriots” and “guardians”

      There is nowhere for the guards to push, it looks like they have a bone instead of a brain... So push, don’t push, nothing changes for the better. request
  8. +2
    April 4 2024 17: 11
    Not a bad article. And at the same time, it is not a stupid idea that the IL76, as a carrier, is not the best solution. Too heavy. Previously, in the 70s, it may have been suitable, when the electronics were analog and wiring harnesses were as thick as an arm. Now (according to the Minister of Informatics) there are devices that are much more powerful and smaller in size. You can take the Tu214 or “the updated MC21 is about to fly” and use them to make AWACS without a saucer
    1. -2
      April 4 2024 17: 25
      do AWACS without a plate

      Backpack disc arrays can have greater detection range while providing more balanced 360-degree detection capability。
      China, in cooperation with Israel, discovered that the overall aerodynamic configuration of the Il-76 for the upper wing monoplane hanging engine layout, while the Boeing-707 for the lower wing monoplane layout, the first in the front of the fuselage on both sides of the antenna array arrangement, radar beam easily blocked by the engine, and some of the radar antennas protrude from the fuselage surface, but will also affect the engine intake to a certain extent, so the Chinese side in the Il-76 conformal array selection is unfavorable, and ultimately decided to abandon this program.
      1. +5
        April 4 2024 20: 08
        Quote from: wanna
        Backpack disk arrays can have greater detection ranges,

        What language do you write in? This particular post is completely unreadable in Russian. Google translator straight to the point? What did you want to say? wassat
  9. 0
    April 4 2024 17: 17
    Having analyzed the operation statistics of the KJ-2000, Chinese military analysts came to the conclusion that this heavy vehicle is suboptimal in terms of cost-effectiveness. The AWACS aircraft, created on the basis of a heavy jet transport aircraft, was too expensive, had low fuel efficiency and placed stringent requirements on home airfields.


    Typical technical advantages of large AWACS are greater endurance, large radar carrier diameter, and multiple internals. However, after 2010, rapid developments in technology have led to significant increases in communication, networking and information processing speeds, and the commands and guidance that originally had to be carried out within the AWACS can be completely transferred to the ground command center for completion, and the need for the amount of on-board equipment for processing has been significantly reduced.
    In theory, the radar range of large aircraft could be increased even further, but in the absence of significant improvements in the performance of other equipment in the existing air combat system (such as fighters and air-to-air missiles), simply increasing the detection range of AWACS lacks interoperability to the extent that the tactical gain will be small. Moreover, the advent of stealth fighters also forces early warning aircraft to pay more attention not just to combat distance, but to counter-stealth distance.
  10. +2
    April 4 2024 18: 39
    We would also be concerned with a small drone aircraft, but 50 are rare and expensive to lose, and small ones will fill the gaps.
  11. +5
    April 4 2024 20: 16
    Linnik made me happy. One of the few remaining adequate authors. For which I thank him very much!

    But the situation in aviation and specifically with AWACS in the Russian Federation is not encouraging. Looks like the Chinese are doing ten times better. And they are already mass-producing 5th generation aircraft. In general, the title of superpower has quietly moved to China. God forbid we fight with them now..
  12. +2
    April 4 2024 23: 23
    Something very interesting, there is no text, but Wanna - if anyone needs it - can translate it, IMHO.


    https://youtu.be/_YabMQ-An14
    1. +1
      April 5 2024 00: 44
      Just general information, nothing new
  13. +1
    April 5 2024 01: 23
    China's KJ-500 'Flying Radar' Fleet Growing Fast: Why America Hates This AEW&C Platform

    https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/kj500-flying-radar-america-hates