Who is the TU-2 being resurrected against in the USA?

26
Who is the TU-2 being resurrected against in the USA?

So, the TU-2S “Draconess” was resurrected by the engineering and technical personnel of the US Air Force. It seems that everything doesn’t look very reasonable, because if you write it correctly, it’s not TU-2S, but TU-2S. I mean, Training U-2S. Training.

We will look at the question of the need for a training aircraft for the best spy plane of all time at the very end, especially considering the statements that the career of the reconnaissance aircraft itself seems to be ending, but for now let’s talk about what is happening in detail.



And this is what happened: in 2021, the Dragoness was fucked on takeoff. And they did it so professionally that the plane was not so much repaired as brought back to life through resuscitation measures. That's what the Americans themselves say on this topic, at least.

On April 21, 2021, an accident occurred during takeoff. As a result, no one was injured, at least that is what the Air Force says about this incident. However, aircraft 1078 suffered extensive damage to the left wing, which practically had to be rebuilt. It doesn’t look like something epoch-making, but we shouldn’t forget when this plane was produced (1979 – 1988), and what is the likelihood of maintaining the equipment for the production of wings.


But the Americans were able to do it and the Dragoness took off for the first time after the accident, taking off from Beale on February 15, 2024. Additional work was completed following a visit to Air Force Plant 42 in Palmdale, California, in mid-March.


Now, after nearly three years of grueling work, the aircraft is again approaching full readiness for regular use.

The USAF's TU-2S two-seat trainers are not only very rare, but they are also critical to training pilots to fly the U-2 spy planes. There are only 4 of them for the entire US Air Force, while the U-2S operates another 26 U-2S aircraft.

It is noteworthy that despite its age, the U-2S outlived the one who was supposed to replace it in combat duty - the Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird. The U-1957, which began its work more than a long time ago in 2, is still in service, being the second oldest aircraft of the US Air Force after the B-52, but the SR-71 has long departed.

This is how the fate of airplanes sometimes works out. Some people leave the stage very quickly, while others carry out their service, despite their age.

Major maintenance of U-2 surveillance aircraft is carried out at Plant 42, where Lockheed Martin typically provides U-2 maintenance. Plant 42 is also home to the famous Skunk Works, which designed the U-2 in the 1950s.

Maintenance center work typically involves a complete refurbishment of the aircraft once every seven years to keep it flying for another seven years. The damage suffered by Air Force One 1078 was so extensive that it could not be transported to Palmdale, and it was decided that all work should be carried out at Beale.

"Since 1078 was stuck in Biel, the decision was made to carry out the wing repairs and all PDM work in Biel rather than at Factory 42"
, said Maj. Brandon, 4th Detachment chief, Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC).

“A small team of Lockheed Martin technicians and Det 4 personnel worked remotely from Beale to complete the PDM restoration on 1078.”
.

So #1078 was completely disassembled, with its engine and wings removed and various parts and components replaced before being reassembled. The exact cost of repairs and maintenance work performed currently remains undisclosed, but it is clear that the three-year overhaul did not cost a pretty penny, but a full dollar. And not alone.

In the end, it was just under three years after the accident before the plane was ready to fly again. On February 15, serial tests began to check the performance of all aircraft systems.

“The flight check included a taxi test to evaluate systems before flight, a low functionality checkflight to conduct safety checks, and a high functionality checkflight that pushed the aircraft to its limits and ensured all systems were operating properly to check all components.”
, said Lt. Col. Joshua, 1st Reconnaissance Squadron commander.


The last test flight from Beale was conducted at an altitude of over 21 meters, the pilot was equipped as for a combat flight in the U-000.


U.S. Air Force Maj. Brandon, chief of the 4th Flight Test Detachment, Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC), before flying Aircraft 1078 at Beale Air Force Base, California, Feb. 29, 2024.


Aircraft #1078 returned to Beale on March 21 with a fresh coat of classic black paint ready for service.


U.S. Air Force Maj. Andrew, 1st Reconnaissance Squadron pilot, greets Lt. Col. Michael, 410th Test and Evaluation Squadron director of operations, after flying TU-2 Dragon Lady 1078 from Palmdale, Calif., to Beale Air Force Base, March 21. 2024.

For the Air Force, the rarity of the TU-2S and their importance in U-2 pilot training provided a clear incentive to restore No. 1078 to full operational condition, despite the difficulty of doing so at the Beale base and regardless of the cost. There really is no substitute for the TU-2S in training pilots to fly the U-2. Especially when it comes to landing, as well as flying at high altitudes.

The U-2 can fly higher than any other operational Air Force jet. It is easier to maintain than the Blackbird and has greater operational flexibility in intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities. It can also be used for other missions, including as a communications relay node and data gateway.

The restoration of #1078 returns this valuable asset back to the 1st Reconnaissance Squadron, allowing the use of as many as three two-seat trainer aircraft. This ensures better aircraft availability for new U-2 pilots, especially following the retirement of TU-2S #1065 in 2023 and the tragic loss of #1068 in 2016.


And then the questions begin. It is clear that a fleet of 27 working U-2S and 3 training TU-2S is still a serious force, capable of covering, if not the whole world, then a significant part of it with its attention. However, we should not forget that the US Air Force has repeatedly tried to part with the U-2 in favor of more modern aircraft and, most importantly, strategic UAVs. And the current state of the Air Force reconnaissance forces is, as it were, not news. In general, according to the plans, by 2026 the Air Force was supposed to finish with the Dragoness and fly the aircraft into history.

But the problem is that the plane is not as replaceable as we would like. It seemed like what was wrong with this – a cosmic armada of satellites in orbit able to keep any part of the earth’s surface under control? No, alas, but I can’t. The satellite is, of course, an excellent reconnaissance tool, but it flies quite high and at a decent speed. And it keeps a certain strip of space under control. But only for the duration of the passage. Next - emptiness until the next passage or the next satellite.

When it comes to total control, for example, in the event of a military conflict, when it is necessary to constantly record missile launches or drones on the part of one of the parties, then the satellites are clearly not able to “hold” 24/7 the entire area, say, SVO. This means that support from other reconnaissance means is necessary.

UAVs have proven themselves very well in many areas, but they have also shown their vulnerability. Strategic reconnaissance UAVs clearly lacked the altitude and maneuverability to evade fighter attacks. What can we say if the reason for the failure of a reconnaissance drone could be a stream of kerosene from the aircraft’s tanks or vortex flows from the engines?

But the main thing, perhaps, is the height. Here it is worth remembering the Chinese reconnaissance probe, which easily flew across the entire United States at an altitude unattainable for air defense and was shot down as a “prestige goal”, having collected and transmitted a bunch of probably useful information. Here is an example of height.

So here it is - a niche for a reconnaissance aircraft. Seemingly lost its value at the dawn of the satellite era, but nevertheless still in service. An aircraft capable of operating at altitudes of 20 km and above under the control of a competent pilot will be an excellent aid to a satellite constellation in orbit.


Apparently, precisely because the Americans (and especially some of their allies) suddenly urgently needed a full amount of information about a particular region, the retirement of the U-2 was once again postponed, and decent amounts of money were invested in the repair and restoration work of the TU-2S, which in temporal terms, which is in material terms.

Clearly, the TU-2S still performs an important reconnaissance role in the Air Force. Depending on whether satellite proponents succeed in permanently eliminating the U-2 fleet, they will serve this role for at least the next few years. This means that the restoration of the TU-2S was not in vain.

We live in a time when many concepts are being rethought, including air control and reconnaissance. And in this aspect, the revival of the “Draconess” to train new pilots is a completely logical result
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -4
    April 1 2024 05: 05
    The Air Force's TU-2S continues to perform an important reconnaissance role.
    Well, of course! They poke their noses everywhere!
  2. +11
    April 1 2024 05: 05
    The U-2 can fly higher than any other operational air-jet Air Force plane...

    What is an "aircraft"? what Are there planes that fly in airless space or under water?
    1. +4
      April 1 2024 05: 21
      Are there planes that fly in airless space or under water?
      Probably underground wink
      1. +2
        April 1 2024 10: 30
        Probably underground wink
        Colleagues, give the author a discount. It’s spring after all, and the flare-ups are getting worse! And only tractors are underground! soldier
    2. +7
      April 1 2024 05: 27
      The author, presumably, had in mind an aircraft with a jet engine, as opposed to a large galaxy of experimental vehicles of the "X" family, which had a variety of propulsion systems and climbed to fantastic heights on the edge of space.
      1. +1
        April 1 2024 10: 00
        Quote: U-58
        The author, presumably, meant an aircraft with a jet engine...

        WRDs can be divided according to the method of pre-compression of the air entering the combustion chambers: into non-compressor ones, in which the air is compressed only by the high-speed pressure of the air flow, and also into compressor ones, and this is too vague, a very illiterate definition. The U-2S aircraft is equipped with a General Electric F118 turbofan engine.
        Quote: U-58
        in contrast to the large galaxy of experimental devices of the "X" family, which had a variety of remote controls and climbed to fantastic heights on the edge of space.

        The X family aircraft were mostly equipped with liquid propellant engines.
    3. 0
      April 1 2024 14: 07
      Like there are rocket planes. They generally fly in space, even higher. But they are not much different from satellites.
  3. +11
    April 1 2024 05: 21
    This is truly a workhorse that will last for years and years to come.
    Throughout its life cycle, the aircraft fits perfectly into the concepts and methods of conducting aerial reconnaissance, essentially defining these concepts.
    In the person of this airborne centenarian, we have another indisputable proof that the competent and skillful use of military equipment of past years can bring not just some benefit, but also solve very specific combat missions on the modern battlefield.
  4. +8
    April 1 2024 05: 25
    Quote: Tucan
    The U-2 can fly higher than any other operational air-jet Air Force plane...

    What is an "aircraft"? what Are there planes that fly in airless space or under water?

    It’s just that the main part of the article is machine translation without text adaptation, and the ending is the author’s own
  5. +15
    April 1 2024 05: 32
    resurrecting TU-2?

    Tu-2 is an aircraft designed by A.N. Tupolev. But TU-2 is a completely different “bird.” There is no need to translate the names to avoid confusion.
    1. +11
      April 1 2024 05: 57
      There is no need to translate names to avoid confusion.
      - He didn’t know that this could not be translated. Don't shoot the pianist - he plays as best he can laughing
    2. +1
      April 1 2024 10: 12
      Quote: Amateur
      resurrecting TU-2?

      Tu-2 is an aircraft designed by A.N. Tupolev. But TU-2 is a completely different “bird.” There is no need to translate the names to avoid confusion.

      This ambiguous title of the article was given in order to increase the number of people who read it. In English, the name of this car sounds like “Ti-Yu-Tu”, but of course not Tu-2.
  6. 0
    April 1 2024 05: 51
    What aircraft are Russian cadets currently being trained on?
    1. +2
      April 1 2024 18: 47
      What aircraft are Russian cadets currently being trained on?
      There is a suspicion that for the most part on L-39, and the rest on Yak-130. The latter is reconfigured in the control channel from a light vehicle to a transport vehicle.
  7. +6
    April 1 2024 07: 29
    Some kind of clumsy translation, mistakes like those described above discourage reading. Is it really impossible to make a correction after machine translation? And so it turns out that “people are snatching it up” or does Roman not care about the article itself? After all, when a topic touches his heart, he writes in a very fiery and interesting way. This is trash.
  8. +2
    April 1 2024 07: 49
    How are we doing in this area? I wonder what projects we have planned and what is planned
  9. -4
    April 1 2024 08: 28
    I don’t understand something, where is the spare parts warehouse in the USA for aircraft manufactured 45 years ago?
    1. +8
      April 1 2024 09: 16
      I don’t understand something, where is the spare parts warehouse in the USA for aircraft manufactured 45 years ago?

      In these aircraft, only the fuselage was made 45 years ago. All the “stuffing” is constantly updated. For comparison, the first photo shows the “original cabin”, the second photo shows the modern one. The engines were also replaced, unified with the B-2 Spirit engines.
  10. -10
    April 1 2024 08: 32
    They don’t give a damn about what to push money into, the main thing is in the war
  11. +2
    April 1 2024 10: 20
    Tu-2 What kind of plane is this? And even American?
  12. -2
    April 1 2024 10: 26
    Strategic reconnaissance UAVs clearly lacked the altitude and maneuverability to evade fighter attacks. What can we say if the reason for the failure of a reconnaissance drone could be a stream of kerosene from the aircraft’s tanks or vortex flows from the engines?

    Yeah! And the U-2, with a permissible overload of +1/-0.5, is maneuverable, it’s scary!
    What kind of kerosene stream is there, a close look is enough to make him throw off his wings. In addition, if the U-2 had enough of the antediluvian S-75, then in modern combat conditions, the life of such an aircraft will be measured by the duration of the destruction command.
    1. +5
      April 1 2024 11: 25
      ... if the U-2 had enough of the antediluvian S-75, then...

      Let's remember. U2 Powerska was shot down near Sverdlovsk (Ekaterinburg). Moreover, after two unsuccessful attempts to lower it to the ground by fighters.
      Today, no one will allow the Dragon (Dragon) into Russian airspace. However, they won’t risk it. no one will interfere with his flight along the border, and he can do less harm. In terms of performance characteristics, only meteorological aircraft (M-55 Geophysics) are comparable to it, and in terms of equipment, the Tu-204 remains from the “Clear Sky” program.
  13. fiv
    -4
    April 1 2024 10: 47
    C125 and beyond are the best friends of dragonesses and dragons. They won't survive the war.
  14. 0
    April 1 2024 10: 54
    In the OKB of V. M. Myasishchev, on the basis of the M-17 “Stratosphere”, they created a high-altitude reconnaissance and strike complex, consisting of the reconnaissance aircraft itself and a ground guidance and control point that provides target designation for surface-to-surface missiles and attack aircraft. The modified M-17RM aircraft made its first flight on August 16, 1988. At the OKB, the aircraft received the designation M-55 “Geophysics”.

    The aircraft has a double-beam design with a high-aspect wing of high aspect ratio, made of supercritical high-load profiles. In the forward part of the fuselage there is a pilot's cabin and a compartment with reconnaissance equipment, weighing about 1,5 tons.


    A two-seat training modification of the M-55U aircraft has been developed.

    Work was underway to create a two-seat high-altitude aerial surveillance aircraft, Geophysics-2, which has improved aerodynamics and an elongated fuselage.


    How this type of reconnaissance is used in the Northern Military District is not entirely clear. There are many winning reports on the Internet
    Recently, Russia again put on combat duty the legendary M-55 Geophysics reconnaissance aircraft, capable of flying in the stratosphere and striking from a height of over 20 kilometers. M-55 "Geophysics" is the result of sixty years of history, military and scientific developments. Originally designed as a civil aircraft for scientific missions, the aircraft was temporarily forgotten, but is now back in business. Our engineers added a unique universal reconnaissance container "Sych" to it. And now this intelligence officer has become a real ghost for opponents, threatening the safety of NATO satellites supplying the Ukrainian Armed Forces with intelligence information on the battlefield. Because of which NATO gave him the designation "Mystic".

    Elon Musk's communications systems, such as the Starlink Constellation, become vulnerable to this universal intelligence agent. The M-55 Geophysics is capable of neutralizing these systems, paralyzing the enemy's military machine and causing them significant communications problems. Their dependence on Western satellite stations is proving to be a vulnerability that threatens their defense system. The ability of a reconnaissance aircraft to fly at unattainable heights and detect critical objects is a real challenge for NATO and its allies
  15. +5
    April 1 2024 11: 29
    Against whom is the TU-2 being resurrected in the USA? (c)

    Why do mattress makers need to revive the Soviet front-line bomber Tu-2?
    Well, I’m just laughing at the mistake.
  16. +2
    April 1 2024 23: 22
    Let's return to the topic: print the author at the beginning of the article. I already read an “article” about the MiG-21 this week or that week. “Creativity” is enough for the next month or two.
    And entering the “filter by authors” button will help save a lot of time. I think many VO readers will support.
    P.S.: As an option to attract clients, ugh, readers... to unblock our foreign comrades.