Once again about capsule locks

37
Once again about capsule locks
The pistol is an oriental capsule pistol, most likely made in the Balkans in the first half of the 19th century. Externally - completely archaic and characteristic of the Balkan weapons production of weapon parts from brass. A massive, protruding trigger spring, which is typical for a “michelet” type lock. But... it already has a cap trigger. That is, we have a clear conversion of a flintlock pistol into a percussion pistol. Penza Regional Museum of Local Lore. Photo by the author


Fire and hail
hunger and death -
all this is created for revenge.
Book of Wisdom of Jesus,
Son of Sirach, 39:36

History weapons. Having learned the power of gunpowder, people immediately thought of how to use it to their own detriment, but they did not immediately figure out how to set fire to it inside the barrel. Although... the same flint has been known since the early Iron Age. Hot iron rods, which required a brazier with coals, a wick made of hemp rope soaked in a solution of saltpeter, and finally spark locks, designed like a lighter with a wheel or a simple impact flint - these were the stages in the development of the gunpowder ignition system in the barrel of a firearm. And chemistry did not play any role in this until 1799!



And this year, mercury fulminate or fulminate of mercury in its pure form was obtained by the British chemist Edward Howard (discovered back in 1774 by the physician of the French royal court, Pierre Boyen) and, as very often happened, completely by accident. He reported his discovery to the Royal Society of London and... received a medal for it.

Howard's article on this discovery was published in the January 1800 issue of the journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Moreover, it already reported on Howard’s experiments at the Woolwich Arsenal together with artillery inspector and superintendent of the Royal Foundries, Colonel Thomas Blomfeld and professor of chemistry at the Royal Military Academy, William Cruickshank. It was assumed that the new substance could be used instead of gunpowder.

It should be noted that the end of the 1786th century was truly marked by the invention of a wide variety of “explosives.” Thus, the French chemist Claude Louis Berthollet, working on the synthesis of salts of hypochlorous and hypochlorous acids, managed to obtain potassium chlorate (Berthollet's salt) in 1788, and in XNUMX another very strong, albeit expensive, explosive - silver nitride (Berthollet's fulminate). ). So Howard's discovery simply dotted the i's for that period of time.

However, all this was more than enough for Alexander John Forsyth to use the explosive properties of mercury fulminate to ignite a powder charge in a gun table in 1805. That is, he decided to do without wheel and impact locks. And already on April 11, 1807, he received a patent for his invention, and then designed a new type of castle, which led to another revolution in military affairs.


Diagram of the Forsyth "bottle lock" device: images from left to right:
1 – the central cylinder with a hole going into the barrel is motionless; 2 – the bottle is turned, the lid of the container with mercury fulminate powder is open; 3 – powder is poured into it; 4 – when the bottle is turned, the spring-loaded firing pin is above the ignition hole.
Fig. A. Shepsa


The scheme of the Forsyth's "bottle lock": images from left to right:
1 – position before the shot: gunpowder and bullet are in the barrel; 2 – the bottle is turned and explosive powder is poured into the pilot hole; 3 – the bottle turns again, and now the firing pin is above the ignition hole with a charge of powder; 4 – the trigger hits the firing pin, the powder ignites, the flame enters the barrel, and a shot follows!
Fig. A. Shepsa

The castle invented by Forsythe was called “chemical”, and it is clear why this is so, instead of flint and steel, “chemistry” worked in it. The inventor himself called it “explosive,” but the name “bottle” suited him best, since its main part was indeed... a bottle, similar to a small perfume bottle. It was fixed on an axis, inside of which the ignition hole of the barrel was located.

In order for the lock to work, it was first necessary to pour mercury fulminate powder into it! The lock turned, a hole opened in it, and this powder poured into the hole of the axle. Then the bottle had to be turned in the opposite direction. At the same time, there was another hole opposite the powder poured into it, through which it was struck by a long spring-loaded firing pin, which in turn was struck by the trigger. The impact ignited the mercury fulminate and ignited the gunpowder in the barrel!

The system worked, since 1809 Forsythe even began to produce guns with his own lock, but he failed to create demand for them.

Naturally, such a discovery could not help but attract the attention of many inventors who wished to improve Forsythe’s invention. And the main thing is that it was easy to improve, which opened up great prospects for creativity!

Instead of powder, for example, they began to use balls made from a mixture of fulminate of mercury with wax or resin. They also came up with a tape made of copper foil, inside which an explosive mixture was pressed and which, when cocked, was automatically applied to the ignition fire tube socket.

But, perhaps most of all, Forsyth’s epigones did not like the proximity of the container with mercury fulminate powder to the ignition hole of the barrel and the firing pin on which the trigger was hit.

“We should move all this away from the hole,” a certain Brute decided and came up with his own lock, also with a flammable mixture dispenser. In this lock, a container with mercury fulminate powder slid along a bar on the barrel, while the trigger itself pushed it, moving it away from the ignition hole in the same bar, into which, whenever the holes on them coincided, a certain amount of powder spilled out of the container!


Different types of percussion cap locks, from left to right:
1, 2 – Bute “horizontal lock”: 1 – traction connecting the trigger with the container for explosive powder; 2 – container for explosive powder; 3 – guide bar for a container with explosive powder; 3, 4 – Kontriner rotary lock: in it the dispenser container was moved by the trigger not in a straight line, but in a semicircle; 5, 6 – diagram of the structure of the G. Koll lock; 7 – Console capsule lock, model 1838: 1 – trigger, 2 – tray for placing the capsule, 3 – safety cover; 8 – Augustine capsule lock. It had a slot for capsules (3), which was covered on top with a lid (2) with an anvil (1). The trigger (4) hit exactly this anvil!

Why such a complication is completely unclear, but it is clear that the capsule was protected very well from extraneous influences.

Very soon, namely in 1814, the American Joshua Shaw came up with the idea of ​​filling caps with explosive compounds, first made of iron and then of copper foil. Around the same time, between 1814 and 1816, British gunsmiths Joseph Menton and Joseph Egg also came up with copper caps that fit on the ignition tube, and it was this lock that became widely known as the capsule lock.

However, the blow of the trigger on the primer often caused it to rupture, and its fragments hit the shooter in the face. Therefore, it is not surprising that lock designs immediately appeared that eliminated this drawback. So, for example, the Console lock had a special tray with a conical tip for puncturing the capsule and also a safety cover!

That is, the trigger did not hit the primer itself, but the cover that covered it, so that if it ruptured, all its fragments remained inside. The Augustine capsule lock received a similar device.

The gunsmith Potte also came up with a very original capsule lock system. His trigger, which struck the primer, was a curved trigger guard plate.


Potte Castle:
1 – mainspring, which simultaneously serves as a trigger guard; 2 – cutout on the spring for hooking the trigger; 3 – trigger; 4 – second recess (safety) of the trigger; 5 – fire tube

The design can be called simple and elegant, but... for some reason it didn’t fit. Perhaps due to the fact that such a lock was too open to the elements, and therefore required careful maintenance, and if the bracket was hit, it could fire an accidental shot.


A typical capsule lock, its cut along the fire tube and the capsule.
Fig. A. Shepsa

It should be noted that Forsythe’s idea, although not immediately and not exactly as he proposed, nevertheless found its application in the English army. In 1839, rifles with cap locks were adopted by the British infantry.

Capsule pistols appeared in England even earlier, in 1825. Well, overseas the most famous capsule weapons of those years were the famous revolvers of Samuel Colt...

Very soon the form of the cap lock became, so to speak, international, except perhaps for the conversion of pistols and shotguns, which at the same time were produced in the East.

They also appeared in Russia quite early, in 1843–1845. The first percussion weapon of the Russian Imperial Army was the famous “Lüttich fitting” (produced in the Belgian city of Liege - “Luttich” is its distorted name), a fitting of the 1843 model.


“Lüttichsky fitting” 1843. Total length 123 (without bayonet) cm. Barrel length 83 cm. Caliber: 15,8 mm along the bottom of the rifling, 15,2 mm along the fields of the rifling. Penza Regional Museum of Local Lore. Photo by the author

Quite unusual guns were also equipped with cap locks at this time, including “very accurate” rifles that had a barrel with a Whitworth drill.


One such rifle is in the collection of the Penza Regional Museum of Local Lore, although the tip of its trigger is broken off. Total length 115 cm. Barrel length 73,4 cm. Caliber: 10 mm. The presence of a Whitworth drill in the barrel indicates that it was used for target shooting. In addition, on the neck of its butt there is a mount for a diopter sight, which is absent on the rifle. Such guns could fire both cylindrical-conical bullets and shot. On the barrel there is an inscription in English - Guss stahl. On the keyplate are S. Petersburg and R. Tschopf. Photo by the author


The faceted barrel of this rifle and the muzzle of its barrel with 7 rifling edges. Photo by the author
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    April 7 2024 05: 16
    Thanks to Vyacheslav and Alexander (I hope I didn’t misspell the artist’s name) for the article. Informative and intelligible, especially with drawings.
    1. +7
      April 7 2024 05: 57
      Thank you for your feedback, dear Vladislav! But you were wrong. Not Alexander, but Aron, Aron Solomonovich is an excellent illustrator of 5 magazines and a lot of books.
  2. +1
    April 7 2024 05: 48
    They also appeared in Russia quite early, in 1843–1845.

    Well, less than a quarter of a century has passed, in some places Dreyse rifles, and in others they have grown to capsules. Tsarism in its “beautiful” form.
    1. +7
      April 7 2024 05: 58
      Quote: mark1
      Tsarism in its “beautiful” form.

      Well, there are few countries ahead of us where “tsarism” did not exist, and even then for a couple of years...
      1. +3
        April 7 2024 06: 06
        The Crimean War showed everything, no matter what, but a magical kick.
        1. +6
          April 7 2024 06: 08
          Yes it is. But what to do if so few Berner fittings were ordered and they were all sent to the border with Austria. I quoted somewhere the Empress’s words about this war. Very revealing. But if she understood this, why didn’t her husband understand?
          1. +2
            April 7 2024 06: 28
            Quote: kalibr
            Why didn’t her husband understand?

            Apparently the mental trauma from 25 influenced my awareness of reality.
          2. +2
            April 8 2024 18: 19
            Quote: kalibr
            But what to do if so few Berner fittings were ordered and they were all sent to the border with Austria.

            This direction was considered more dangerous.
            Well, our army is still large for objective reasons.
            Let’s say the British have the entire army with fittings... all forty thousand. And we have a million soldiers, of whom the same forty thousand are armed with rifled weapons. But this quantity is spread across all troops.
            Plus two hundred thousand rifles were manufactured during the Crimean War.
            1. +2
              April 8 2024 18: 23
              I held the Berner fitting in my hands, just like the ’43 fitting. I'll write about this again. Both seemed terribly heavy...
  3. +1
    April 7 2024 06: 10
    I am more interested in another question - as far as I remember from chemistry, mercury is toxic in any form and in any quantity! Didn’t the chemist inventors understand this when they used it as a component for a charge?
    1. +8
      April 7 2024 06: 32
      Lean - as far as I remember from chemistry, mercury is toxic in any form and in any quantity! Didn’t the chemist inventors understand this when using it as a component for a charge?

      A lot of knowledge gives rise to sorrow!
      The toxicity of mercury, or rather its vapors, became known at the end of the 18th century. For example, the domes of St. Isaac's Cathedral in St. Petersburg were “gilded” in “gas masks” in the form of glass flasks. Did not help.
      However, scientists and ordinary people were not afraid of using it in everyday life and science until the middle of the last century. For example, back in the 30s, doctors treated patients with syphilis with it. Only the most powerful company of the Ministry of Health, the echoes of which I even saw in the 80s, broke the conviction of the masses from prigism to panic!!!
      1. +6
        April 7 2024 13: 17
        Mercury and mercuric fulminate are different substances. Mercury fulminate (mercury fulminate) is a mercuric salt of fulmic acid - an initiating explosive. It is a white or gray crystalline powder. Rhombic crystals. The salt does not evaporate. And if you don’t eat it, it’s harmless.
      2. +3
        April 7 2024 15: 13
        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
        . For example, back in the 30s, doctors treated patients with syphilis with it.


        At first, Lues venerea was treated with infusions of guaiac wood and sublimate, and from the middle of the 16th century, when guaiac was recognized as useless, - only with sublimate and related mercury-based remedies 

        . It was not immediately possible to separate the signs of mercury poisoning from the symptoms of different stages of syphilis, which contributed to the formation of a group of “dissidents” who considered syphilis non-contagious (or completely non-existent) and attributed its symptoms to the action of drugs

        The most famous patient:
    2. +4
      April 7 2024 08: 47
      Quote: Thrifty
      in any form

      The fact of the matter is that not in any way, but I won’t say exactly how and in what form.
      1. +3
        April 7 2024 11: 35
        Caliber- hi I have a distant relative, a chemist, who claims that ANY mercury content in ANY form is dangerous to human health, the only difference is the time during which this harm will be caused to the human body!
        1. +5
          April 7 2024 11: 37
          Did not know. I read or heard somewhere that not all compounds are so toxic. But this is an OBS source, so the information from your relative is better.
  4. +3
    April 7 2024 07: 16
    Thanks to the author, very interesting article hi
  5. +1
    April 7 2024 08: 13
    Forsyth used the explosive properties of mercury fulminate to ignite a gunpowder charge in a gun table.
    The letter was missed.
  6. +7
    April 7 2024 08: 34
    The scheme of the Forsyth's "bottle lock": images from left to right:

    Vyacheslav Olegovich, tell Sheps to correct the drawing a little, spending a little more yellow paint, because in the form as in the article, the castle will not fire. The "explosive composition" never reached the ignition hole. Exactly like in the photo.
  7. +10
    April 7 2024 09: 48
    8 – Augustine capsule lock. It had a slot for capsules (3), which was covered on top with a lid (2) with an anvil (1). The trigger (4) hit exactly this anvil!

    The capsule in the Augustine lock had the shape of a rolled brass tube that was inserted directly into the seed hole. Such a capsule was attached with a wire to the cartridge. When loading the cartridge, there was no need to bite it; it was torn apart by a wire. It also served to remove the primer from the primer hole after the shot. In the first photo there is an Augustine lock, in the second there is a capsule in comparison with the “classic” one in the form of a cap, in the third there is a cartridge with a capsule.
    By the way, this lock appeared due to the fact that Colonel Natalis-Felix Beroaldo-Bianchini, who headed the Vienna Arsenal and was responsible for the rearmament of the army, considered the design of the capsule in the form of a cap completely unsuitable, since the rough fingers of soldiers would not be able to handle such small objects and the capsule would be get lost. As a result, Austria-Hungary “went its own way” in the matter of converting flintlock weapons into percussion weapons, developing the Console castle and its improved version - the Augustine castle.
    1. +6
      April 7 2024 11: 40
      I always knew that you were smart and I was once again convinced of this! It's a pity that the last photo doesn't have a source link. Only for the last one!!!
    2. +2
      April 8 2024 20: 55
      Quote: Dekabrist
      The capsule in the Augustine lock had the shape of a rolled brass tube that was inserted directly into the seed hole.

      This reminded me of the Demondion breech-loading system with its unitary paper cartridge with a tube primer...
      1. +3
        April 8 2024 21: 24
        Actually, this is the Joseph Robert system. Auguste Demondion was his cousin and attorney, so in England the patent was issued in his name.
        1. +1
          April 8 2024 21: 40
          Quote: Dekabrist
          Actually this is Robert's system

          Well, on the Internet there is also such a designation for the system as Robert/Demondion (Demondion “made” the cartridge, and Robert the bolt... it seems like that was the case! )... By the way, about this system (as the Demondion system... ) I learned a long time ago...from Markevich! Well, I somehow got used to it! wink
          1. +4
            April 8 2024 21: 54
            Didn't make Demondion ammo. He lived in London, representing his brother's interests there. Joseph Robert patented his system for himself only in France. In England, a patent was granted to Auguste Demondion, in Spain, to his son-in-law, Henri Arnault de la Ménardière; in Belgium, a certain Jean-Baptiste Jobard received a patent, etc. And Robert made the cartridges himself. That's what it says on the cartridges.
            1. 0
              April 8 2024 23: 54
              Quote: Dekabrist
              Didn't make Demondion ammo.

              Well, actually, by the word “made” I meant: designed! Then, what did Demondion actually do, if he is credited with trading in cartridges, and someone is credited with designing a unitary cartridge with a primer-tube? what
  8. +6
    April 7 2024 10: 42
    Quote: Thrifty
    Didn't the chemist inventors understand this when they used it as a component for the charge?

    So, they understood and even tried to give up mercury fulminate! But at that time there were “more arguments” for the use of mercury! By the way, mercury fulminate was not used in its pure form for long...they began to “body” it by adding antimony and bertholite salt! (Deficiencies were discovered in the use of “pure” mercury fulminate; because detonation occurred almost without the formation of gases and the pressure necessary for complete combustion of the gunpowder was not created adequately. And for smokeless gunpowders that appeared later, it was also necessary to increase the combustion temperature of the initiating composition So, the improved "mercury fulminate" consists of 35% mercury (ignition), 25% antimony (combustion temperature), 40% berthollet salt (oxygen for combustion) ...) But there were also attempts to do without mercury altogether ... Back in the early 19th century, gunsmith Pauli used “potash chloride” (Berthollet’s salt) primers in his cartridges... [The approximate composition of such a primer: Berthollet’s salt, crushed glass, sulfur, gum...add some more antimony and soot (coal )] In the 70s of the 19th century, a “French” capsule made of lead picrate appeared in France...
    1. +5
      April 7 2024 10: 48
      PS When I was fascinated by the topic of fallers in my youth, I managed to find 2-3 “substances” suitable for use as initiating compounds and suitable for production in the 18th century!
      1. +5
        April 7 2024 12: 02

        Nikolaevich I
        Today, 10: 48
        PS When I was fascinated by the topic of fallers in my youth, I managed to find 2-3 “substances” suitable for use as initiating compounds and suitable for production in the 18th century!

        I can’t resist - I’m swearing.
        The end of the century before last, we lost a lot, in the person of Nikolaevich!!!
        laughing
        1. +3
          April 7 2024 14: 32
          Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
          The end of the century before last, I lost a lot...

          Let those centuries who did not get us cry, let those “experts” who did not appreciate us “bite their lips”... (Hymn of the Hitmen!) wink
          PS Vladislav-prosit! drinks
          1. +2
            April 7 2024 17: 11
            Let those centuries who didn’t get us cry, let those “experts” who didn’t appreciate us “bite their lips” (Anthem of the fallen!) wink

            Yeah, with your inclinations, I’m afraid that various Narodnaya Volya members and other militants would bite their “lips”! At the very least, they went down in history as Kotovsky’s friend or Stalin’s comrade in arms!!!
            1. +2
              April 7 2024 18: 58
              Why are you so “gloomy” about me! ?(friend of Kotovsky, comrade of Stalin!)...But I can also “use a typewriter”!
              1. +1
                April 8 2024 05: 24
                Why are you so “gloomy” about me! ?(friend of Kotovsky, comrade of Stalin!)...But I can also “use a typewriter”!

                Yep, hellish!!!
                Good morning! lol
                1. 0
                  April 8 2024 18: 40
                  Have a nice one you too ! hi -------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
  9. +2
    April 8 2024 16: 16
    Many thanks to the Author for an interesting story.

    I was always amazed at the monstrous caliber of the weapons of those years - apparently, the caliber compensated for the weak energy of the charge.

    14 mm is an anti-tank rifle of the first half of the 20th century, and here is a 15 mm rifled fitting, while in the 19th century there were no longer armored troops. Monstrous caliber (I'm not talking about a pseudonym :)).
    1. +3
      April 8 2024 18: 26
      Quote: S.Z.
      Monstrous caliber

      It’s even scarier to hold the bullets of this weapon in your hands. If one of these hits a bone in your hand, it will completely rip your entire arm off. And in the chest... I don’t even know what kind of hole there will be...
  10. 0
    April 9 2024 23: 10
    It seems that the bulk mechanism was abandoned for two reasons:
    1. Danger of detonation of small fulminate particles caught in the gaps between the dispenser and the main container.
    2. A gradual increase in the dose of fulminate due to an increase in the volume of the chamber in which the explosion occurred. With repeated use this was inevitable.
    Well, it’s safer to store mercury fulminate in capsules than in large containers. And for health too.
    Good material, with additional disclosure in the comments. Thank you !