What rifle did Leo Tolstoy's Hadji Murad shoot from?

32
What rifle did Leo Tolstoy's Hadji Murad shoot from?
The butt of a Turkish gun from the collection of the Penza Regional Museum of Local Lore. Author's photo


Hairy Hanefi, with his sleeves rolled up,
and here he performed the position of servant.
He loaded the guns
which Hadji Murat and Kurban conveyed to him,
diligently driving with an iron ramrod
bullets wrapped in oiled whips
and pouring dry gunpowder from the powder onto the shelves.
Khan Magoma did not sit like others,
in a ditch, and ran across from the ditch to the horses,
driving them to a safer place,
and kept screaming
and shot from the hand without pads.
L. Tolstoy "Hadji Murat"

People and weapon. I have written many times about how our whole life comes... from childhood, and in old age we, again, return to it, although on a different level. And some never return. It's up to anyone's luck.



For example, I was lucky to be in the Penza Regional Museum of Local Lore even before school, which I went to in 1962. The museum made an amazing impression on me then and for a long time determined the nature of extracurricular activities: the model of the Penza fortress forced ancient Russian fortresses with towers and towers to be made from logs rolled up from plasticine, a diorama with primitive people stoning a cave bear, brought to life its numerous imitations on the grass from moss and pieces of granite picked up on a railway embankment.

But what was especially imprinted on my consciousness then and entered my life as a separate topic was the ancient weapon. Times were simple then, and many samples of sabers hung right on the walls, and guns, although hidden under glass display cases, were not protected by any alarm, like a soldier in a grenadier miter and with a musket at his foot, standing in the corner of the hall dedicated to A.’s connections. V. Suvorov with Penza.

Then I read in the book “A Bookstore Near Place Etoile” (author N. Kalma) that, apparently, the same soldier stood in the Poltava Museum of Local Lore, and I thought that, apparently, they were mass-produced somewhere and sent to regional museums.

There were a lot of interesting things there, but for some reason the strongest impression on me was made by two clearly oriental guns.

One with some very narrow butt, which ended in a massive butt plate made of bone, and the other with a curved faceted butt, abundantly inlaid on the wood with small patterns of yellow metal.

Then, out of harm’s way, all this was removed from the exhibition, but... then a moment came, “a happy moment came,” and my meeting with them took place again, only now I knew what to look at first, and what really may mean something seen.
It turned out that both of these guns are indeed very interesting examples of firearms in all respects, which can tell a lot about themselves.

But first of all, it should be remembered that, although the principle of striking sparks with the help of a flint, which had to be struck on an iron plane (flint or flint), was known to various peoples since the beginning of the Iron Age, the idea of ​​​​using flint in order to ignite gunpowder on a shelf firearms did not immediately occur to people.

And, by the way, where exactly and to whom first is unknown.

But there is evidence that in the 20–30s of the XNUMXth century, early percussion locks had already appeared in Sweden, Germany and Italy. In the countries of Northern Europe, such a lock was called “schnaphan”, i.e. “hitting trigger”: a name that well conveys the essence of its device.

However, varieties of such a castle immediately appeared, the main of which were two: Northern European and Mediterranean. In turn, its Northern European variety over time began to be divided into subtypes: Swedish, Dutch, Russian and even Karelian!


Dutch flintlock "schnaphan". Drawing by A. Sheps

Although they were all very similar and differed only in details.

The same thing happened in the south, where the Mediterranean type began to be subdivided into Spanish, Portuguese, Arabic, Turkish, Caucasian, in which, in turn, experts began to distinguish Kubachi, Circassian and Transcaucasian subtypes. Although they are all, in principle, very similar to each other and differ only in the size and shape of individual parts.

At the same time, the Mediterranean type also received the name Mikelet, under which it became mainly known.

It has a number of noticeable differences from the classic French battery lock.

Firstly, the powder shelf of the miquelet is usually covered by an L-shaped lid, which plays the role of a flint with stripes of notches on the surface, apparently serving as guides for sparks. It was supported from below by a strip or spring. The trigger spring is very wide and protrudes noticeably above the surface of the locking board. She presses on the trigger shank and thus puts it into action.

But there is one more subtle detail in this lock: a safety device consisting of a protrusion of the trigger and a safety cocking rod that extends from the lock board.


Michelet device. The square head of the safety rod is clearly visible directly under the trigger protrusion. Drawing by A. Sheps

When cocking the hammer, this rod protruding from the locking board did not interfere with this. And when you press the trigger, that is, in this case, the ball, it was retracted inside the board and did not interfere with the trigger hitting the flint cover!

The most interesting thing is that this lock was used on the same Turkish and Caucasian guns until the beginning of the 19th century, when everywhere, if not capsule locks, then, in any case, battery locks of the French type were already used.

And, of course, oriental guns, whether they were made in the Balkans or in Turkey itself (there is an inscription in Arabic on the lock), they were always richly decorated. The most expensive ones are made with silver, turquoise and corals, and the cheaper ones are inlaid with wood and metal and “notching” of metal parts, especially the lock and barrel.


A shotgun with a Michelet lock of the Mediterranean type. The hammer is cocked. Material: steel, wood, brass, ivory. Manufacturing techniques: forging, drilling, inlaying wood with metal, “notching”. Total length 138 cm. Barrel length 108,9 cm. The barrel is rifled, faceted - 8 sides, 8 rifling. The caliber at the bottom of the rifling is 13,7 mm. The rifling field is 12,5 mm. The ramrod, the butt, and the stock are richly inlaid with brass wire. The butt plate is made of ivory. On the barrel there are inscriptions in Arabic using the “notch” technology. Penza Regional Museum of Local Lore. Photo by the author


This is the same castle. The trigger is on the safety cock and cannot strike the flint without pressing the trigger. You can pull the trigger, and then the blow will occur, but it will not be strong. There won't be a shot! Therefore, first it will need to be pulled back all the way. And without pressing the trigger (in this case it’s a “ball”), he won’t be able to hit the flint


But in this photo the trigger is pulled completely. You can see the protrusion of the trigger, which presses the fuse rod inside the shelf!


It’s interesting that what we have in front of us is not just a flintlock gun, but a rifle, that is, a gun with a rifled barrel that has eight grooves. Photo of the muzzle


Even the metal cleaning rod of this gun is covered with a notch, that is, inlaid with metal on metal. Photo by the author


But this is definitely a Turkish gun, as evidenced by the inscriptions on its barrel, and the shape of the butt plate of the stock and its butt. Guns similar to it are kept in the Kremlin Armory and in the Artillery Museum in St. Petersburg. Time of manufacture: end of the 126,4th – beginning of the 90,6th century. Material: steel, wood, brass. Manufacturing techniques: forging, drilling, inlaying wood with metal, “notching”. Total length 8 cm. Barrel length 7 cm. The barrel is rifled, faceted - 15,5 sides, 14,5 rifling. The caliber at the bottom of the rifling is XNUMX mm. The rifling field is XNUMX mm. The ramrod is lost. The stock and butt are richly decorated with brass wire inlay. There are applied brass plates on the barrel. Penza Regional Museum of Local Lore. Photo by the author


There is a mark on the barrel - a convex metal inlay, but it is difficult to say what it means. Photo by the author


By the way, this is also a rifle! Photo of the muzzle


Typical Turkish castle Miquelet! Photo by the author

So, we made a short excursion to the East, to where they made such beautiful guns, and, judging by the description given in Leo Tolstoy’s book “Hadji Murad”, both he and his nukers could easily have used something like this here are guns - rifles with michelet locks!
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    30 March 2024 04: 50
    Thank you! Very interesting! I would also like to learn about the technology.
    1. +3
      30 March 2024 05: 00
      I would also like to know about the technology
      This is the most important thing!
      1. +7
        30 March 2024 12: 48
        Quote: Dutchman Michel
        the most important thing!

        I saw this gun in 1961. And only now you saw him and at least learned something. That is, for more than half a century no one knew anything about him, and who saw then... what could he say? And now, after so many years, at least something is becoming known about him. In my opinion this is the most important thing.
        1. +4
          30 March 2024 13: 58
          In my opinion this is the most important thing
          There are many interesting and even unusual guns. But how gunsmiths made them, without machines and precise measuring instruments, would be simply wonderful to reveal. It's all beautiful. But technologically how?
          1. +5
            30 March 2024 15: 19
            Quote: Dutchman Michel
            But technologically how?

            I understand your question. But here I am holding a gun in my hands. I see metal inlay on wood. I see the notch of metal on metal and I understand how it was done technologically. But how the castle was made, like the trunk... They themselves are silent about it. I don’t have a time and space machine - move and look. And all this is written very sparingly, if written... Unfortunately...
            1. +4
              30 March 2024 17: 41
              But here I am holding a gun in my hands. I see metal inlay on wood. I see a notch metal on metal
              Somewhat reminiscent of a woman completely plastered with cosmetics. But what's inside her is a mystery. wink
            2. 0
              31 March 2024 03: 55
              I see metal inlay on wood. I see a notch metal on metal

              Moreover, all these inscriptions and symbols could have been applied much later than production; the rifle could have been made in one era and place, and the inscriptions and symbols could have been made in another era and place
              1. +2
                31 March 2024 06: 35
                Quote: t7310
                in another era and place

                That is unlikely...
  2. +3
    30 March 2024 07: 06
    The article, as always, is informative and provides food for thought. The development of small arms directly depended on the development of their manufacturing technology and technical capabilities at that time. And so they progressed: from wick to flint, from needle and capsule to firing with a modern unitary cartridge.
  3. +6
    30 March 2024 09: 14
    It has a number of noticeable differences from the classic French battery lock.

    Firstly, the powder shelf of the miquelet is usually covered by an L-shaped lid, which plays the role of a flint with stripes of notches on the surface, apparently serving as guides for sparks. It was supported from below by a strip or spring.

    Not all Miquelet locks have a corrugated powder cover. Many Spanish micqueletas do not have them. The first photo shows a pistol made by the Spanish gunsmith Pedro A. Esteva, circa 1730. The cover of the powder shelf is smooth. By the way, the marks are very similar to the marks of the rifle from the Penza museum.
    In fact, the corrugated lid is characteristic only of Turkish and North African locks.
    But there is one more inconspicuous detail in this lock: a safety device consisting of a protrusion of the trigger and a safety cocking rod that extends from the lock board

    This part is called the sear - part of the firing mechanism of a firearm that holds the hammer or striker in the firing or safety cock. Both the French castle and the Mediterranean one have a sear. Only their structure is fundamentally different. The French castle had a vertical sear, while the Mediterranean castle had a horizontal sear. The vertical sear allows you to significantly reduce the force on the trigger. Actually, this is the main difference between the locks in question.
    1. +4
      30 March 2024 11: 11
      It’s interesting that at that technological level they didn’t think of a collimator sight. After all, everything happened - the simplest optics have been known for centuries, as have artificial light sources.
      Then Hadji Murat could also use tongs to straighten the tip of the lantern wick in such a collimator...
      1. +1
        30 March 2024 20: 37
        Then Hadji Murat could also use tongs to straighten the tip of the lantern wick in such a collimator...

        With such an aim he could only correct the tip. In trousers.
  4. +1
    30 March 2024 11: 10
    Vyacheslav, thank you, as always, great article for your morning coffee. And the question arose - what is the obturation of the bullet due to? Wad or leather wrap?
    1. +3
      30 March 2024 11: 36
      Most likely, of course, she was wrapped in something. But what? It could have been suede or oiled canvas.
      1. +3
        30 March 2024 12: 17
        which Hadji Murat and Kurban conveyed to him,
        diligently driving with an iron ramrod
        bullets wrapped in oiled whips

        lol
        1. +5
          30 March 2024 12: 19
          Quote: Chief Officer Lom
          oiled bullet whips

          Don't laugh, Alexey. This is a consequence of work. The article was written a week ago. Therefore, I practically don’t remember its contents. If I remembered everything I wrote, I would have gone crazy long ago!
          1. +3
            30 March 2024 12: 23
            Happens. Sometimes I and other colleagues and employees wonder if we’ve already said hello today or if it was yesterday...
        2. +1
          30 March 2024 15: 36
          What are whips? From what and how?
          1. +1
            30 March 2024 17: 31
            The word is very ambiguous. But there is also a meaning: “a cloth for wiping weapons”
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +2
    30 March 2024 16: 59
    It’s interesting that what we have in front of us is not just a flintlock gun, but a rifle, that is, a gun with a rifled barrel that has eight grooves. Photo of the muzzle

    What is especially interesting is that the rifling is straight, i.e. this is definitely not a rifle laughing
    Our friend Shpakovsky, as usual, gets into technical details, which, as a born humanist, he does not understand at all. tongue
    1. +5
      30 March 2024 17: 17
      Quote: Saxahorse
      What is especially interesting is that the rifling is straight, i.e. this is definitely not a rifle

      How do you know they are straight? Did you look down the barrel and shine your cell phone into it? They are gentle, but nevertheless, they go in a spiral. I checked. Same as with the Berner fitting. There, too, it seems that they are straight, but... Berner also has screw ones. But more on that in the next article. Besides, it doesn't matter whether they are straight or not. Any rifled weapon can be called a rifle. This is how it differs from weapons with a smooth bore... However, you can come to Penza, go to the director of the museum, ask for permission to examine it, citing the fact that... the weapon is described incorrectly, and... look into the barrels.
      1. +1
        30 March 2024 21: 58
        Quote: kalibr
        Besides, it doesn't matter whether they are straight or not. Any rifled weapon can be called a rifle.

        No, you didn't guess. A rifle is usually called a weapon with a screw rifling barrel. hi
        1. 0
          30 March 2024 22: 06
          Quote: Saxahorse
          A rifle is usually called a weapon with a screw rifling barrel.

          This is your opinion ...
          1. 0
            31 March 2024 20: 33
            Quote: kalibr
            This is your opinion ...

            I won’t even argue. laughing
    2. +3
      30 March 2024 17: 42
      Our friend Shpakovsky, as usual, gets into technical details
      It’s just that he doesn’t go there. Unfortunately
      1. +1
        30 March 2024 18: 53
        Straight rifling was sometimes used; straight rifling gives the highest muzzle velocity because... carbon deposits from black powder remain in the rifling, and the bullet slides along the margins, the contact area is smaller and, as a result, there is less friction than, for example, just in a smooth barrel. (although straight rifling does not provide stabilization) by the way, if you make straight rifling in a smoothbore tank gun, you can expect a slight increase in the initial speed
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +4
          31 March 2024 00: 23
          Quote: agond
          Straight rifling was sometimes used; straight rifling gives the highest muzzle velocity because... carbon deposits from black powder remain in the rifling, and the bullet slides along the margins, the contact area is smaller and, as a result, there is less friction than, for example, just in a smooth barrel.

          Straight rifling was used not to increase speed, but due to the fact that after several shots, carbon deposits from black powder simply prevented the bullet from being pushed into a smooth barrel with a small gap - therefore, either a small gap between the barrel/bullet and straight rifling to squeeze out the carbon deposits, or a large gap and the bullet wrapped in paper wrapper/leather flap. Well, or the option is simply a bullet of a smaller diameter, dangling like dung in an ice hole and forgetting about the accuracy of the shot, but at the same time you can quickly reload. In mass army weapons, the last option was chosen
          1. 0
            31 March 2024 12: 25
            Quote: BORMAN82

            Straight cuts were not used to increase speed

            Here is another consideration: if the obturation of the bullet during loading is high, then what about the gunpowder, which, in the process of feeding the bullet, should tend to exit through the ignition hole?
            If he clogs this hole, then halfway through it the bullet will be pushed back by the air compressed in the barrel. To avoid this, you can reduce the diameter of the bullet, but then it will hang around like something in an ice hole, which is not recommended for making bullets from. You noticed this correctly)
            The remaining option is cutting grooves. So the bullet is centered, and loading takes place without these problems. In addition, when fired, the wad or wrapper is deformed to the sides, closing the grooves from the breakthrough of powder gases.
            1. 0
              31 March 2024 20: 32
              Quote from cpls22
              In addition, when fired, the wad or wrapper is deformed to the sides, closing the grooves from the breakthrough of powder gases.

              Paper is a very bad sealer, it burns and grinds into mush. I reminded Shpakovsky that the pressure in the rifle barrel is about 3 tons. Even lead flows; it is no coincidence that copper belts began to be used in shells; this is a material with the minimum possible strength.
  7. 0
    31 March 2024 00: 03
    Quote: kalibr
    Any rifled weapon can be called a rifle. This differs from weapons with a smooth bore...

    Tell us, and we will listen to how smooth-bore guns are classified as rifled weapons! with Supra and Lancaster cuts.
    1. +1
      31 March 2024 06: 37
      Quote: BORMAN82
      with Supra and Lancaster cuts.
    2. 0
      April 1 2024 13: 08
      Tell us, and we will listen to how smooth-bore guns are classified as rifled weapons! with Supra and Lancaster cuts.

      Firstly, “Lancaster” is not cutting, but drilling. Secondly, the author refers to the wonders of Russian “protective” legislation, the twists and turns of which do not fit into normal logic.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. The comment was deleted.