The evolution of the infantryman's unloading systems

36
The evolution of the infantryman's unloading systems
Mosin rifle and cartridge bag with two sockets. Photo: Wikimedia Commons


Rifle soldiers or representatives of other specialties need special equipment to conveniently carry ammunition and other items. In modern armies, so-called weapons are used for this. tactical unloading vests with a large number of pouches and pockets for various purposes. The optimal appearance of such a piece of equipment was formed throughout the last century, and current samples are completely superior to their predecessors in their properties.



Belts and straps


At the end of the 19th century. Repeating rifles became widespread. This weapon increased the firepower of the infantry, but increased the consumption of ammunition. There were also additional requirements for equipment to carry ammunition. Soldiers needed means to carry a sufficient amount of ammunition.


British soldiers with Type 1908 Pattern RPS, France, 1915. Photo: Imperial War Museum

The answer to this was the so-called. belt-shoulder systems (RPS), which combined simplicity and efficiency of solution as their main task. A typical RPS was a waist belt supplemented with shoulder straps. Cartridge bags for ammunition in bulk or in clips were attached to the front belt. The size and capacity of the pouches were determined by the type of cartridge and the method of loading the infantryman’s standard weapon.

Ammunition carrying equipment has been constantly evolving. Different materials for the belt and straps were introduced, and the number and configuration of pouches changed. As small arms developed, systems appeared with pouches not for clips, but for magazines. Separate grenade slots also appeared. In some cases, pouches were attached not only to the belt, but also to the straps.

It is curious that already in 1908 the British army brought these ideas to their logical conclusion. The 1908 Pattern Web Infantry Equipment system provided for equipping the standard RPS not only with cartridge pouches, but also with a satchel bag, additional belt bags, etc. The amount of ammunition and property carried increased sharply. Subsequently, such ideas were implemented in other countries.


British RPS arr. 1937 Photo Imperial War Museum

Further development


Belt-shoulder systems of a traditional appearance were used during both world wars and were constantly improved. The development of this concept continued during the Cold War. Now pouches for grenades and magazines were hung on the belt. However, over time, RPS gave way to newer and more advanced unloading systems.

The new stage of improving the RPS used the same methods as before. First of all, new materials were introduced. If early products were made of leather, then in the middle and second half of the 20th century. switched to canvas and nylon. Ergonomics have been improved. The configuration of the straps changed, and expanded shoulder straps appeared for greater wearing comfort. Pouches acquired the size of machine gun or rifle magazines, and also began to be rigidly attached to the belt.


American fighter with ALICE unloading system mod. 1973 Photo of the US Department of Defense

Their versions of the so-called. unloading breastplates (some products were also called vests) appeared in all leading armies. Chinese “Type 58” bibs, created in the late fifties, became widespread in different countries. Based on the experience of combat operations in Afghanistan, the Soviet army also developed its own versions of such equipment - both the factory product “Belt-A” and various handicrafts. Several examples of similar belt-based ammunition were used by the United States and its allies during the Cold War.

From belts to vest


A belt-based unloading system has several important advantages. First of all, this is the ease of adjustment to the figure of a particular fighter. At the same time, there are restrictions on the placement of pouches. Essentially, only the front and sides of the lap belt are accessible, as well as the front of the shoulder straps.


Soviet special forces in Afghanistan, 1988. The fighter in the middle uses the Belt-A breastplate. Photo by RIA News / Wikimedia Commons

Solutions like 1908 Pattern Web Infantry Equipment or the use of a new “platform” in the form of a vest made it possible to get rid of such restrictions. A solid fabric vest has a large usable area, is also comfortable to wear and easy to make.

It is believed that the first unloading vests were created in the early thirties in Italy and were intended for paratroopers. Such vests were worn over the head and had fasteners on the sides. On the chest and back there were horizontal pouches-pockets for box magazines of standard submachine guns. Such pockets reminded some of the armor of Japanese warriors, and the nickname “samurai” was assigned to the vests.

During World War II, similar means were introduced to a limited extent in units of Great Britain and the United States. For example, British special forces received Battle Jerkin products. The “combat hunting jacket” was made of leather and had pouch pockets over most of its area. The vest and standard backpack allowed the fighter to carry ammunition for long battles.


Italian soldier in a Samurai vest, 1943. Photo by Wikimedia Commons

However, vests of this kind did not become widespread during the Second World War and in the post-war period. Improved RPS, to which the name “vest” passed, were more popular. However, full-fledged solid vests did not disappear and later returned to practice.

Modular approach


In the nineties, the MOLLE equipment fastening system was developed and implemented in the USA. It provided for equipping items of equipment with horizontal slings and straps for suspension. This system made it possible to make the ammunition completely modular and configure it in any convenient way. The emergence of MOLLE radically influenced the development of unloading systems.


Uniform military body armor 6B45 from the Russian “Ratnik” equipment. All free planes are equipped with a MOLLE system sling. Photo Vitalykuzmin.net

First in the USA, and then in other countries, new modular combined systems were created and widely implemented, combining protective and carrying equipment. The basis of such a system is a solid vest with internal pockets for armor elements and slings on the outside. Pouches for magazines, grenades, etc. are attached to the chest part of the vest. Other equipment can be placed on the sides or on the back using a standard mount.

The modular principle provides obvious advantages. It allows you to create an independent unloading system or integrate pouches with body armor. There is a wide selection of pouches and other devices with standardized fastenings, allowing you to carry not only magazines and grenades, but also other equipment and equipment. With all this, the fighter gets the opportunity to place the pouches on the vest in the desired way and get maximum ease of use.

Unloading vests of modular architecture quickly showed their potential. In addition, during local wars of recent decades, such equipment received good advertising. As a result, almost all developed armies have now, to one degree or another, introduced American-style modular ammunition, and are also developing this direction.


Combat protective breastplate 6B46 for "Ratnik", equipped with pouches. Photo Vitalykuzmin.net

Growing needs


Over the past century, the infantryman's equipment has constantly changed in the direction of increasing the number of items carried and increasing their total mass. In this regard, the issues of carrying ammunition and the ergonomics of this process acquired particular importance. The answer to them was the emergence of belt-shoulder systems, vests and modular complexes of various kinds.

To date, military and engineering thought has reached unified and universal systems for carrying equipment and ammunition, which can be adapted to almost any task and requirement. Modern unloading vests, incl. with a ballistic protection function, they solve a wide range of tasks and firmly take their place in a fighter’s equipment. And we can expect that modular systems will remain in operation for a long time - with certain innovations, but without fundamental changes. At least until completely new requirements for such equipment arise.
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    31 March 2024 05: 01
    I gave the article a "+". Against the backdrop of the “late, little, useless” narrative characteristic of this author, this publication is a pleasant exception.
    1. +8
      31 March 2024 05: 16
      It just didn’t touch the topic of 6b47 model ’22. am
      1. +4
        31 March 2024 05: 31
        You don't have to write...
        1. +3
          31 March 2024 05: 40
          Eh, don't say it crying
          Ratnik bought Shchelkovsky... they say it’s the best thing on the market... altered fool But under the UDS there are of course problems there too
          1. -7
            31 March 2024 15: 11
            The "Ratnik" kit was honestly taken out of the warehouse by an ensign and delivered to a private store selling army ammunition at his own percentage, but for the SVO, delivery from the warehouse does not work due to the lack of property. And in any case, my conscience will not allow me to wear a trophy item, especially a used one, because it is impossible in principle.
    2. +16
      31 March 2024 06: 27
      Seriously, work on “unloading” should begin with the advent of firearms, if not earlier.
      In essence, the “belt”, “holster”, “magazine bags” are the development of systems for carrying bladed and metal weapons.
      1. +10
        31 March 2024 08: 09
        Then we need to remember the Roman legionnaire’s wagon... An original version of unloading - because if something happens, you can simply throw the stick with the loaded property and immediately take your place in the ranks.. I don’t know how convenient it was to use it - but if it lasted so many years , there was probably some kind of homespun in it. The Romans were very practical guys..
        1. +8
          31 March 2024 08: 16
          I don’t know how convenient it was to use, but if it lasted so many years, there was probably some kind of homespun in it. The Romans were very practical guys..

          You are completely right!
          To be honest, I would personally erect a monument to the person who invented the duffel bag!!!
          1. +8
            31 March 2024 08: 21
            I think it was invented back in the Paleolithic, and not even by the Cro-Magnons.. what Some poor Neanderthal whose wife has eaten a bald spot and is inconvenient for her to carry junk under her arm during the transition.. laughing
            1. +1
              April 4 2024 09: 40
              I think it was invented back in the Paleolithic, and not even by the Cro-Magnons yet.. what Some poor Neanderthal whose wife has eaten a bald spot and that it is inconvenient for her to carry junk under her arm during the transition.. laughing


              More likely. At least Ötzi already had a frame backpack 5300 years ago. And a relief belt.

        2. +4
          31 March 2024 11: 14
          Quote: paul3390
          Then we need to remember the furka of the Roman legionnaire


          Each Roman legionnaire was a small “man-archestra,” that is, he must be able to master some civilian specialty of those times.
          The Legion could easily be used to restore infrastructure after natural disasters.
          1. +3
            31 March 2024 19: 52
            Quote: Simple
            The Legion could easily be used to restore infrastructure after natural disasters.

            This is true. The Legion built roads in peacetime. Construction battalion! laughing
  2. +3
    31 March 2024 05: 39
    The lines for each soldier - and + UAV, which pulls him up on a campaign, carries for some time, distance. That's all. Transferring the load and the weight of the warrior to the UAV propellers. Then the copter becomes a reconnaissance shooter, etc. And so on in a circle
    1. +5
      31 March 2024 09: 12
      Each department needs a personal donkey, as in the Roman contubernium.. what wink
      1. +1
        31 March 2024 11: 40
        Quote: paul3390
        Each department needs a personal donkey, as in the Roman contubernium.. what wink
        A commander's armored personnel carrier is needed. 3 armored personnel carriers transport personnel, and the fourth carries platoon junk.
      2. 0
        31 March 2024 16: 28
        Each department needs a personal donkey, as in the Roman contubernium..

        A one-wheeled “iron mule” car, like the Chinese infantry. I think there was an article about this equipment here.
  3. +4
    31 March 2024 06: 14
    The general idea is to find a middle ground between a pack animal and a functional combat unit.
  4. +1
    31 March 2024 06: 21
    Flexible exoskeletons need to be developed... the lower back, shoulders, neck, arms must be freed from weights... after 50 km of marching over rough terrain with a load of 30-50 kg, the fighter will be exhausted to the limit... but he still needs to complete a combat mission ...an exoskeleton will help a lot here.
    1. +5
      31 March 2024 07: 16
      after 50 km of cross-country march

      I naively believed that armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles existed to move such distances... And only Suvorov and his heroes could walk like that on foot..
      1. -1
        April 1 2024 04: 18
        In the mountains, along rocks, ravines on infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers???
        But ... smile
      2. 0
        April 1 2024 10: 57
        Quote from Andy_nsk
        I naively believed that armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles existed to move such distances... And only Suvorov and his heroes could walk like that on foot..

        Or the infantry of the 154th Infantry Division and the non-motorized motorized rifles of the 3rd TA Rybalko. wink
        In terms of tactical training: motorized infantry and infantry learned to perform 25-km marches in 3 hours, followed by combat missions and long marches of 50 km. In addition, the infantry and motorized infantry practiced throws over 7 km in 40–45 minutes, as well as the main topics: oncoming combat, offensive combat with a breakthrough of the enemy’s defense and development of success, consolidation of captured lines, organization of reconnaissance and combat support, defensive combat.
        © D. Shein. Tanks are fishing. The combat path of the 3rd Guards Tank Army.
  5. +6
    31 March 2024 06: 54
    Soviet special forces in Afghanistan, 1988. The soldier in the middle uses the Belt-A breastplate.

    The fighter most likely has a self-propelled weapon or something similar to a Chinese chicom. The one on the right has a homemade product. Since Belt A looks like this, with belt B. Our fighters used floatation vests from armored vehicles, sewed pouches from AK or AKM, Chinese chi-com, etc., in general, as much as their imagination allowed.
  6. +2
    31 March 2024 07: 25
    belt-shoulder systems
    For 4 years at school I had to wear one during field classes. Particularly painful was the fastening of the raincoat on the back (with one strap), which constantly fell out during active movements, no matter how you fastened it. Today's unloading in relation to this “miracle” is like heaven and earth.
  7. +1
    31 March 2024 10: 22
    Thanks for the article, this time you wrote it better than usual.
  8. +3
    31 March 2024 10: 57
    For once, the author suddenly produced a decent article. Respect!
  9. +1
    31 March 2024 11: 43
    The fighter in the middle uses the Belt-A breastplate.
    How can you crawl in something like this? And the “horns” will become clogged with dirt...
  10. +3
    31 March 2024 12: 48
    Hmm, why is the evolution from a pouch for cartridges from a three-ruler to a pouch for 3 magazines, 4 “combs” and an oil can with a pencil case forgotten?! How wonderfully it stays on the belt!
    1. 0
      31 March 2024 18: 20
      When assembled correctly, the RPS holds up perfectly! :)
  11. +3
    31 March 2024 15: 22
    Not bad. Of course, the description of each type of equipment should be followed by a photograph or drawing. The author defiantly ignored this rule, as if he didn’t care. It's a pity. So the material is not bad.
  12. 0
    31 March 2024 17: 53
    The topic is important but presented in an extremely primitive way - like the British had RPS and everyone rushed to tear them apart, and before they appeared, they fought only with what was in their pockets and on their belts?
    1. +1
      31 March 2024 18: 22
      One article cannot cover the whole topic... :)
  13. 0
    31 March 2024 19: 33
    If we mention that the “Belt - A” product is a development of the Chinese “unloading” Type 56, then it is worth noting that the presented BNZ 6B46 is a good copy of the American design RACK (Ranger Assault Carrier Kit)
  14. 0
    April 1 2024 13: 46
    A copy of the British system during WWI was worn in the field as part of a military historical reconstruction. Significantly more convenient than Russian and German equipment, first of all, in the location of the pouches. Well, you can put the assembled one on yourself in half a minute.
    1. 0
      April 3 2024 20: 36
      - Alekseevites in British equipment? what
      1. +1
        April 4 2024 10: 31
        Yes, in 1920 they were almost universally worn (though more often than not as shoulder bags, rather than as infantry equipment). And not only Alekseevites: for example, photos of Donetsk soldiers in British helmets come across.
  15. 0
    April 4 2024 10: 09
    You need to remember that all shoulder “unloading” puts pressure on the spine, so you get tired even faster. It’s convenient to take out, but they are not suitable for long journeys. Specialized backpacks don’t count; they put a lot of strain on the waist belt.

    I once bought a spin fishing vest, it would seem that it weighs nothing, these are not equipped magazines. I threw it away after the 3rd fishing trip, although I had a chance to run around with the army unloading. Why the hell carry extra weight, it’s easier with a bag. It's all easy when you're young. wink

    In combat conditions, the issue is also controversial, for example, special forces with a belt following the results of the Chechen war.