Anti-aircraft complex Phalanx CIWS against kamikaze boats

41
Anti-aircraft complex Phalanx CIWS against kamikaze boats
ZAK Phalanx CIWS fires


While conducting missions in the Middle East, the US Navy is again faced with the threat of kamikaze boats, manned or unmanned. Such equipment poses a significant threat to surface ships and vessels, and appropriate measures must be taken. As a simple, ready-to-use and effective means of protection against surface boats, it is proposed to use standard ship artillery systems Mk 15 Phalanx CIWS.



Decades in service


The development of the future product Phalanx CIWS (Close-In Weapon System) has been carried out by General Dynamics since the late sixties. At the beginning of the next decade, an experimental anti-aircraft artillery system was taken to the test site, and in 1973 it was installed on a carrier ship. At this stage, the main advantages of the product were shown, but at the same time, the disadvantages appeared. It took the next few years to correct them.

At the end of the seventies, the ZAK "Falenks" successfully passed all tests and entered production. In 1980, the first ship received a full set of such products, and after that the number of their carriers constantly grew. Currently, US Navy warships of almost all current types are equipped with Mk 15 complexes in varying quantities. In addition, ZAKs were supplied abroad for installation on foreign-built hulls.

Since the early eighties, US Navy ships have repeatedly participated in various operations and used their Phalanx CIWS systems. These ZAKs have several air and surface targets of different classes in combat. At the same time, during combat use there were some unpleasant incidents. So, there were random shots with consequences, friendly fire, etc.


Shooting at a target boat

The specialized organizations of the Navy are studying the possibility of new threats and ways to combat them. Thus, in recent years, the potential of unmanned surface ships with weapons or warheads has been actively studied, and the search for effective countermeasures has been carried out. During the relevant tests and studies, the Phalanx CIWS ZAK showed the best results - it was able to detect surface targets in a timely manner and hit them with high accuracy.

Since October 2023, the US Navy ship group has been operating in the Red Sea and protecting shipping from attacks by the Yemeni Ansar Allah movement. The Houthis are trying to interfere with sea communications using their existing anti-ship missiles and kamikaze boats. At the same time, the American fleet gets the opportunity to test the theoretical developments of the recent past.

Technical part


The Phalanx CIWS product is an automated artillery mount designed to combat air and surface targets in the near zone. It was created as the last echelon of the ship's defense in case the threat breaks through other means of defense. The ZAK was required to react quickly and be able to quickly inflict maximum damage on a target - these requirements determined the main features of the appearance.

The Felenks complex is designed as a combat module with a height of 4,7 m and a weight of up to 6,3 tons (for later modifications), which has all the necessary devices and systems. The module has a rectangular box-shaped base on which a rotating device with a swinging part is placed. The latter is equipped with an automatic cannon and radars in a characteristic casing, giving the entire complex a recognizable appearance.


"Falenx" operator at work

The ZAK is equipped with a six-barreled 20 mm M61 Vulcan cannon with external drive. Early modifications of the complex used a gun with a barrel length of 76 klb; in the later ones they introduced a gun with barrels 99 klb long. External drive and automation provide a rate of fire of 3-4,5 thousand rounds/min. The design of the installation provides horizontal guidance within 150° to the right and left of the neutral position and vertical guidance from -25° to +85°.

For firing at air targets, the Mk 244 round with an armor-piercing projectile of “increased lethality” is used. Such a projectile should be capable of damaging the penetrating warhead of an incoming missile and causing it to explode. High-explosive incendiary shells are used to target coastal targets. The ZAK's ammunition capacity is 1550 rounds in a special magazine.

The complex is equipped with two radars located in a common casing. Under the top cap there is a rotating antenna of the detection station, which is responsible for illuminating the situation and identifying dangerous objects. Phalanx CIWS does not have a friend or foe identification system, but the detection radar can assess the course and degree of danger of an air target. Detection range is at least 8-10 km.

An object flying towards the ship is automatically transferred to the tracking and fire control station. Such a radar with a fixed antenna continues to monitor the target and provides data for firing. In addition, it accompanies fired shells and adjusts fire. Depending on the target parameters, tracking begins from ranges of at least 3-5 km. The fire opens at 2 km or closer.


Store loading process

The complex is controlled from a remote control at the central post of the carrier ship. The operator has the ability to control all operating parameters and receives data from the radar. He can select the operating mode of the complex and target destruction - automated with human participation or fully automatic.

Gun vs boat


As part of the current US Navy operation in the Red Sea, Phalanx CIWS systems are used for their intended purpose - to intercept incoming missiles. The first victory of this kind was reported at the end of January. In addition, high-speed kamikaze boats are a typical threat in the current conditions. The standard air defense systems of American ships can work against such targets and demonstrate sufficient effectiveness.

Several key factors contribute to achieving acceptable results. First of all, you need to consider the features of the new goal. A surface boat is a small or medium-sized target with a high (by surface fleet) speed. In terms of size and difficulty of detection/tracking, it is similar to anti-ship missiles, which are typical targets of the Felenx. At the same time, the speed of the boat is several times lower than that of a rocket. This makes him an easier target to escort and destroy.

During tests in the recent past, the standard radars of the Mk 15 complex showed their ability to detect boats and motor boats over the entire range of operating ranges. They also provide sufficient fire accuracy. Apparently, this is due to the existing stock of characteristics - the boat is much slower than a typical air target.


ZAK without casings. Radio systems are clearly visible

The firing characteristics of the M61 cannon are also more than sufficient to guarantee the destruction of a surface object at a limited speed. The main factor of this kind is the rate of fire - it increases the likelihood of numerous hits and causing sufficient damage to the boat. In this case, it is possible to destroy the warhead and detonate the target at a safe distance. This effect can be achieved using any projectile used, both armor-piercing and fragmentation.

The design of the complex also matters. The Phalanx CIWS module is capable of firing at fairly large declination angles. This makes it easier to fire at surface targets from the high side of the carrier ship. In addition, the dead zone near the ship is reduced and the available firing time is increased.

It is also necessary to note the economic features of Felenx. Thus, one unitary 20x102 mm shot for the M61 cannon costs just over $45. The full ammunition load of the complex costs the taxpayer almost $70 thousand. Moreover, the ammunition allows you to hit several targets sequentially. In terms of combat costs, the ZAK is superior to any missile system capable of attacking surface targets.

Remedies


The capabilities of the Phalanx CIWS to combat small surface targets were determined during recent tests, and now the US Navy can test them in practice. We can expect that small-caliber artillery installations will show good results and will help in the fight against a new characteristic threat.

It should be noted that not only the American Felenx can solve such problems. Foreign developments in the field of naval anti-aircraft artillery, incl. Russian. With proper organization of combat work and joint use with other weapons, they can become a convenient and effective means of protection against a new type of threat.
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    15 March 2024 03: 58
    In general, it all comes down to detection.

    With proper organization of combat work and joint use with other weapons, they can become a convenient and effective means of protection against a new type of threat.
    As it turned out, competent organization in the fleet is not limited to holding hockey tournaments and other cultural events.

    A surface boat is a small or medium-sized target with high (by surface fleet standards) speed.
    In addition to size, there are also measures to reduce visibility, although if the ship is on the move, then the most inconspicuous BeK will give itself away (in the radar range) with breakers, waves and wakes. But all successful fireboat attacks were carried out against stationary ships.

    In addition, it accompanies fired shells and adjusts fire
    T.N. "closed loop of regulation".
    1. +4
      15 March 2024 11: 30
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      In general, it all comes down to detection.

      And the possibility of capturing the BEC and accompanying it by normal means - radar or OEC. And not through the eyes of a sailor standing in the socket of the sighting column behind the foreshortening sight.
      1. 0
        15 March 2024 11: 45
        Quote: Alexey RA
        And the possibility of capturing the BEC and accompanying it by normal means - radar or OEC. And not through the eyes of a sailor standing in the socket of the sighting column behind the foreshortening sight.

        AK-630s are mainly controlled by fire control systems, Bagheera seems to have a radar and even a TV channel, if you're hinting.
        1. 0
          15 March 2024 15: 45
          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          AK-630s are mainly controlled by fire control systems, Bagheera seems to have a radar and even a TV channel, if you're hinting.

          With Bagheera, everything depends on the version - whether it has a separate OEPU "Sfera-02" (or "TOU" directly on the radar), or not.
          Moreover, the TOU does not write anything about all-weather and 24-hour operation - only about visual observation by two TV cameras and a built-in laser rangefinder.

          "Karat" even has a sight column with a monitor on its website. smile
          The column is equipped with:
          sight with foreshortening rings;
          gyro-stabilized television camera;
          gyro-stabilized laser rangefinder (as an option);
          removable liquid crystal display;
          electronic unit;
          secondary power source.
  2. +4
    15 March 2024 04: 26
    A surface boat is a small or medium-sized target with high (by surface fleet standards) speed. In terms of size and difficulty of detection/tracking, it is similar to anti-ship missiles, which are typical targets of the Felenx. At the same time, the speed of the boat is several times lower than that of a rocket. This makes him an easier target to escort and destroy.
    During tests in the recent past, the standard radars of the Mk 15 complex showed their ability to detect boats and motor boats over the entire range of operating ranges.

    OMG.
    If you still have access to the Internet, you can learn a lot of interesting things.
    For example, that the Phalanxes have long been modernized and, in addition to radars, use optics to fire at boats: "Overhaul in recent years has consisted of numerous upgrades to the weapon itself, converting existing systems to the so-called Phalanx 1B configuration. At the same time, the CIWS overhaul also includes the development and ongoing integration of a new next-generation radar for the system called CIWS Phalanx Block IB Baseline 2, Navy officials explained.
    The Block 1B configuration provides protection against asymmetric threats such as small fast surface ships, slow-flying fixed and rotary-wing aircraft, and unmanned aerial vehicles by adding an integrated far-infrared (FLIR) sensor.
    The Navy is currently upgrading all Phalanx Block 1B Baseline 0 and 1 close-in weapon systems to the latest Phalanx Block IB Baseline 2 configuration, Eng said. The plan is to have the entire fleet of CIWS Phalanx Block IB Baseline 2019 aircraft available by FY 2.
    " https://warriormaven.com/sea/navy-ciws-can-now-hit-surface-small-boats
    Well, the radar “works” poorly against such targets, but FLIR works well.

    If you look on the Internet a little more, you can find out that Phalanxes, even with FLIR, are “yesterday”; and “today’s day” is RIM116, Bushmasters (patamushtan needs more effective projectiles and fire control systems); "tomorrow" - lasers.
  3. -2
    15 March 2024 05: 42
    We have a 12,7/108 cartridge.
    They have a 20/102 shell. Isn't the chain mail short?
    1. +6
      15 March 2024 06: 21
      No, it's not short. In our fleet the main anti-aircraft caliber is 30 mm. And the main anti-aircraft machine gun is the AK-630. This gun (ours) is very good. If only she had a modern control system, and not on synchros, she would generally be “top”...
      1. 0
        15 March 2024 06: 28
        I'm talking about the cartridge case, not the caliber. About the powder charge, and accordingly the speed and range.
        1. +1
          15 March 2024 08: 48
          ...The cartridge has a bullet weighing 102 grams with an initial speed of 1005 m/s and an energy of about 52000 J. This allows it to penetrate/destroy obstacles inaccessible to weaker cartridges such as 50 BMG, 12,7 × 108 mm, 14,5 × 114 mm...

          If they are not lying, then there is enough of everything, both gunpowder and speed.
          1. +2
            15 March 2024 21: 47
            If you are talking about MTPU-1, then there are obvious problems with shooting at a small target with more than 2-3 bullet bursts. The aim is lost. And yes, the foreshortened sight shakes a lot.

            In rough seas, when a person has to work as a “gunner-stabilizer,” and at night, the firing efficiency of the MTPU-1 is low.



            There is a combat module "Uprava-Kord" with a KPVT machine gun on a gyro-stabilized platform with remote control - but its dispersion when firing more than 2-3 bullet bursts is also quite high. This is why they shoot with a maximum of 2-3 bullet bursts:





            https://youtu.be/wDPU1_jWgKk

            When repelling an attack from several targets at once, the fire performance is low.

            In addition, the Uprava-Kord BDM is armed only with the relatively few patrol boats of Project 03160 Raptor, which have a main-caliber BDM + two 7,62 mm Kalashnikov machine guns. For comparison, a similar American patrol boat:



            "Main caliber" 12,7 mm. And although there is only one Browning M2HB machine gun on a stabilized DUBM, there is also, as a rule, an M2HB on manually aimed installations, as well as 7,62 mm single-barreled (M240B or M240N) and six-barreled (M134 (naval index Mk 25) Minigun ") machine gun. With a slightly smaller displacement, the firepower of an American patrol boat is several times higher than that of the Raptor.
            1. 0
              15 March 2024 22: 20
              Quote: AlexanderA
              If you are talking about MTPU-1, then there are obvious problems with shooting at a small target with more than 2-3 bullet bursts. The aim is lost.

              So he doesn’t shoot in long bursts in the video. It is difficult to understand what would have happened to the aiming if he had fired them.

              Quote: AlexanderA
              And yes, the foreshortened sight shakes a lot.

              It is not needed, you can remove it and hide it away.

              Quote: AlexanderA
              There is a combat module "Uprava-Kord" with a KPVT machine gun on a gyro-stabilized platform with remote control - but its dispersion when firing more than 2-3 bullet bursts is also quite high. This is why they shoot with a maximum of 2-3 bullet bursts

              It seemed to me from the video that this is not even a dispersion of the machine gun itself, but simply that the boat as a whole is tilted by the recoil, so the burst is deflected upward.

              And the stabilization works frankly poorly - this can be seen even without shooting.
              1. +1
                15 March 2024 23: 07
                Quote: DenVB
                So he doesn’t shoot in long bursts in the video. It is difficult to understand what would have happened to the aiming if he had fired them.

                The 14,5 mm KPV is fired in long bursts only from the ZPU.



                It is not needed, you can remove it and hide it away.


                This is where I disagree. A sight is needed. But, so to speak, “tightly welded”, as on the same M2HB:



                By the way, it is clear that on the simplified swivel mounting of the M2HB machine gun that is used in the US Navy, the aiming is also lost when firing in bursts, but the length of a typical burst is still higher than on the domestic MTPU-1.

                To increase fire performance, the US Navy also uses double-barreled mounts of 7,62 mm M20B or M240N machine guns and 12,7 mm M2HB (in my opinion, the latter is completely unsuccessful):



                Well, and as I already noted, multi-barreled machine guns:



                And the stabilization works frankly poorly - this can be seen even without shooting.


                Stabilization on the Uprava-Kord paper machine, in my opinion, is quite good, at least no worse than on similar Western 12,7 mm paper machine. It’s just that these 12,7 mm DBMs with a longer and more accurate burst still have better queues. However, not for everyone. Let’s say the Turks in the video below performed very poorly:



                The Turkish military-industrial complex is young. Not everything works out the first time.
                1. 0
                  15 March 2024 23: 40
                  Quote: AlexanderA
                  The 14,5 mm KPV is fired in long bursts only from the ZPU.

                  In the video they also shoot short. And it’s not entirely clear where. For pigeons, or something.

                  Quote: AlexanderA
                  This is where I disagree. A sight is needed.

                  Many people don't understand this. But a sight on a machine gun is not really needed at all. This is not a rifle.

                  Quote: AlexanderA
                  By the way, it is clear that on that simplified swivel mounting of the M2HB machine gun that is used in the US Navy, the aiming is also lost when firing in bursts

                  It seemed to me that the aiming here was mainly caused by incompetent shooters. And the same problem - short lines. This is not an automatic machine. Press the trigger and hit. Watch where the bullets hit and aim for the point of impact on the target.

                  Quote: AlexanderA
                  Well, and as I already noted, multi-barreled machine guns

                  Here! It feels like the special forces know how to fire a machine gun. A rare case against the generally dull background.

                  Quote: AlexanderA
                  Let's say the Turks in the video below performed very poorly

                  Yes, it's shameful.
                  1. 0
                    16 March 2024 00: 42
                    Quote: DenVB
                    In the video they also shoot short. And it’s not entirely clear where. For pigeons, or something.

                    "Fire from an anti-aircraft machine gun mount against air and ground targets is carried out: in short bursts - 6-10 shots, long bursts - 12-20 shots and continuous bursts up to 300 shots from both machine guns" - from the manual for ZPU-2. Video from the Iran-Iraq war - so they were shooting at some jet planes. For such purposes, the accuracy of ZPU-4 fire in long bursts is more than acceptable.
                    Many people don't understand this. But a sight on a machine gun is not really needed at all. This is not a rifle.

                    When aiming along tracks when shooting at an air target and/or signs of bullet drops (“fountains”) when shooting at a surface/ground target, you can do without a sight - but only if the weapon remains controllable when firing in long bursts. The same six-barreled M134 often does not have sights.



                    Although, as you can see in the video, a Picatinny rail is provided for the sight. When used on ground vehicles, a collimator sight is usually installed:


                    https://youtu.be/BOG-65IjS_A

                    It seemed to me that the aiming here was mainly caused by incompetent shooters.

                    By the way, shooters usually don’t look incompetent in settings with the M134. This is because the machine gun is well controlled when firing in long bursts. Including, apparently, because the rotating block of barrels acts as a kind of natural “gyroscope”. However, the single-barrel 12,7 mm GAU-21 (FN M3M), see the video above, is also clearly well controlled when firing in long bursts. Well, apparently both the machine gun and its turret are good.

                    Yes, it's shameful.

                    For contrast, the firing of the DBM of the old representative of the European military-industrial complex Saab Technologies:

                    1. -1
                      16 March 2024 01: 03
                      Quote: AlexanderA
                      When aiming along tracks when shooting at an air target and/or signs of bullet drops (“fountains”) when shooting at a surface/ground target, you can do without a sight - but only if the weapon maintains controllability when firing in long bursts.

                      Exactly. And this is exactly how you need to shoot at high-speed (and quickly maneuvering) BECs.

                      Quote: AlexanderA
                      For contrast, the shooting of the DBM of the old representative of the European military-industrial complex Saab Technologies

                      Yes, these are good. But the fire density is too low.

                      To defend against BECs, I think you need something in the region of 20 rounds per second. And the ability to continuously fire at least 500 (or better yet 1000) rounds. And the barrel would be well cooled.

                      All in all. there's no harm in dreaming.
      2. 0
        15 March 2024 13: 45
        Selsyns are a drive for guidance. What is the problem here and what is the alternative? The speed is very high, but the detection means and their coordination with the installation control is a problem!
        1. 0
          April 22 2024 16: 02
          . What is the problem here and what is the alternative?

          The main problem is the obsolete element base, but I don’t see any way to solve it.
    2. +7
      15 March 2024 06: 37
      We have radars for beauty, they don’t see anything, one can only dream about phalanx complexes, the Black Sea Fleet has shown this, there are no competent managers in the fleet
    3. -2
      15 March 2024 16: 13
      In general, the anti-aircraft four-barreled "Shilka" has a caliber of 23 mm, the same caliber of the ZSU23-2, which also provides long-term rapid fire, large ammunition, and cheaper shells.
  4. +3
    15 March 2024 09: 37
    Enough time has passed since the death of Moscow to change at least something!
    The phalanx is certainly good, but we don’t have it
    Our existing AK-630 gun is wonderful, but there is no radar linked to the gun’s control system
    and the debate about which caliber is better is “kindergarten, panties with straps” - you need a rate of fire and not so much penetrating ability, but something like a “stopping effect”, when everything in the space behind the body is hit
    1. +10
      15 March 2024 13: 25
      Quote: Dedok
      our existing AK-630 gun is wonderful

      The ineradicable tradition of the domestic military-technical school: weapons roar deafeningly, sparkle with fire, caliber, rate of fire, range - there are no analogues in the world. The only problem is it doesn't get anywhere.
      1. 0
        16 March 2024 04: 22
        Quote: DenVB
        The only problem is it doesn't get anywhere.

        So its task is not to hit the target. As Shipunov himself said, its task is to throw a cloud of shells somewhere towards the target and hope that the target will stumble upon at least one. So far it turns out to be just shit.
  5. +6
    15 March 2024 10: 11
    In fact, the main weapon against small surface targets on American destroyers is the 25 mm Mark 38 artillery mount, stabilized in all planes based on the Bushmaster cannon.
    Initially, it was manually controlled, but then the Americans purchased the Typhoon remote-controlled combat module from Israel, and fully integrated it into the ship’s weapons control system.
    In modern versions it has the following configurations.
    25mm AU Mark 38 Mod. 2 - stabilized remote-controlled modification on the Mark 38 Mod machine. 2 with semi-automatic guidance (also with the possibility of manual guidance) and an optical-electronic sighting system that allows for target acquisition and automatic tracking, which includes television and thermal imaging channels, as well as a laser range finder and a ballistic computer[3].
    25mm AU Mark 38 Mod. 3 - improved version of Mod. 2 on a Mark 38 Mod. 3 with updated electronic equipment, including the ability to install a coaxial 7,62 mm machine gun[4].


    Has a single-shot semi-automatic mode for single shots; burst mode, several frames at a time; low-speed full-auto (LRFA) with a rate of fire (ROF) of about 100 rounds per minute; and a high-speed fully automatic (HRFA) mode with a maximum rate of fire of approximately 200 rounds per minute.

    Uses different types of ammunition, can be loaded with two different types of projectiles at the same time.
    Pointing angles in the vertical plane range from -15 to +55 degrees, that is, its anti-aircraft capabilities are limited. Maximum range 6800 m, effective range - 3000 (2500) m
  6. +3
    15 March 2024 10: 43
    We need to install a target detection and tracking radar on the AK-630. There would be no price for them. And then there's Roy Duet.
    1. 0
      15 March 2024 11: 37
      Quote: alberigo
      We need to install a target detection and tracking radar on the AK-630.

      So our ZAKs already have a radar - MR-123.
      And the main way of working for the AK-630 is based on data from the radar channel. Another thing is that the BEC does not seem to see this radar - and it has to work in a backup way, from the sighting column.
      1. 0
        15 March 2024 12: 47
        Well, the backup method needs to be corrected, for example, install an optical station on it, someone somewhere suggested at least from the same "Bending"
        1. -1
          15 March 2024 15: 33
          Quote: alexmach
          Well, the backup method needs to be corrected, for example, install an optical station on it, someone somewhere suggested at least from the same "Bending"

          Not to edit, but to supplement.
          The sighting column is often located not where it is optimal for guidance, but where there is room for it and it is possible to ensure the operation of an uncovered l/s. Therefore, it can be left as a reserve reserve (in case the UEC fails), and as the main backup, the UEC ball can be stuck somewhere closer to the AC.
          1. +1
            15 March 2024 17: 24
            But how does the BTR-82A manage without sighting columns? There, the gunner needs an LCD monitor.
      2. 0
        April 1 2024 13: 56
        We are talking about different things. For the Americans, the radar is combined with the gun mount, but for us it is moved outside. Agree, accuracy suffers.
  7. +2
    15 March 2024 11: 14
    I would like the author to briefly describe similar systems in our arsenal and compare their performance characteristics with those of NATO. I’ve never been a sailor, I don’t know
    1. +1
      16 March 2024 00: 23
      you don't know this author. Better not.
  8. -5
    15 March 2024 11: 54
    Well, overall, it looks nice against a single target. We take a couple of distracting high-speed drones that circle around the radius, throw in dipoles. Discharge the ammunition and then launch the boats.
    1. +4
      15 March 2024 12: 05
      Quote: SlonBobich
      We take a couple of distracting high-speed drones that circle around the radius, throw in dipoles. Discharge the ammunition and then launch the boats.

      If they have time to throw it... No matter how they themselves are "thrown" before they reach the "radius".
    2. 0
      16 March 2024 04: 34
      You should take a book, such as a children's encyclopedia on military equipment.
  9. -7
    15 March 2024 11: 57
    And I also had the idea of ​​dropping simple reflectors from a height of 2500. That should discharge this installation. And in a blind crater, you don’t even want to drop grenades
    1. 0
      16 March 2024 04: 35
      Did they figure out how to open a teleport in a blind spot?
  10. +1
    15 March 2024 13: 14
    Quote from: chimik70
    I would like the author to briefly describe similar systems in our arsenal and compare their performance characteristics with those of NATO. I’ve never been a sailor, I don’t know

    Why compare them? Have you forgotten that everything we have is the best and has no analogues? At least before the SVO, they wrote about it every day.
  11. 0
    15 March 2024 17: 55
    AK 630 will cope with this task.
  12. -1
    15 March 2024 17: 58
    Quote from Alexandre
    AK 630 will cope with this task.

    The naval version of the "Pantsir" needs to be modified so that it can work against surface targets.
  13. +3
    15 March 2024 22: 18
    All these radars are very cool! But development and refinement takes 6 months - 2 years. And tomorrow Ukraine will knock out 20 BECs against the next trough of the Russian Black Sea Fleet! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdb9L3BBnq0&t=185s I consider it the best machine gun in the Russian Federation today, against such threats, just in addition to the Teplyak or Night Light for a sailor shooter, screw on a powerful laser green pointer from Alik, and at 8 -10 such turret installations on any trough of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, no surface BEC will be afraid of us! I'm not even talking about 2-3 Mavika 3T, and when walking 2-3 calculations of the FPV of night drones on a ship for destruction at 1-3 km, these slow BEC meshes!! The trouble is not in our proposals, the trouble is in the absolutely stupid people without initiative, who snuck in and clung to the most profitable places, they only know how to pretend to be tough guys!
  14. +1
    15 March 2024 22: 19
    Quote: ureport
    All these radars are very cool! But development and refinement takes 6 months - 2 years. And tomorrow Ukraine will knock out 20 BECs against the next trough of the Russian Black Sea Fleet! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_Dl4UC-wY8 I consider it the best machine gun in the Russian Federation today, against such threats, only in addition to the Teplyak or Night Light for a sailor shooter, screw on a powerful green laser pointer from Alik, and at 8 -10 such turret installations on any trough of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, no surface BEC will be afraid of us! I'm not even talking about 2-3 Mavika 3T, and when walking 2-3 calculations of the FPV of night drones on a ship for destruction at 1-3 km, these slow BEC meshes!! The trouble is not in our proposals, the trouble is in the absolutely stupid people without initiative, who snuck in and clung to the most profitable places, they only know how to pretend to be tough guys!