Pulsating air-breathing engines from Wave Engine (USA)

57
Pulsating air-breathing engines from Wave Engine (USA)
The promising VALP platform as imagined by an artist


Aircraft-type unmanned aerial vehicles can be equipped with propulsion systems of different classes. In particular, the American company North American Wave Engine Corporation proposes the use of pulsed air-breathing engines (PvRE) and is developing similar devices. Previously, it has repeatedly demonstrated its engines on a stand and on aircraft. The company is currently testing an experimental Scitor-D UAV equipped with a J-1 engine.



Development process


The North American Wave Engine Corporation (abbreviated as Wave Engine Corp.) was founded in Baltimore (Maryland) in the first half of the 1900s by former employees of leading US enterprises in the field of engine building. From the very beginning, the company's goal was to develop pulsed air-breathing engines with different characteristics suitable for use on various aircraft.

In 2016, Wave Engine Corp. began bench testing of the first PuVRD of its own design. The first real results of the project allowed us to count on support from potential customers. Thus, in 2019, the company received $2,85 million from DARPA to continue work. Later, the company received other grants of one size or another.


Experimental glider with PURD, 2020

The following year, an experimental engine - probably with money from the Pentagon - was brought to flight testing. A serial non-motorized glider was used as an air platform for the experimental PuVRD. Installing the engine significantly improved its flight performance and flight duration. In addition, such tests showed the potential of the aircraft using optimized aerodynamics and a pulsating engine.

In June 2021, the US Air Force Weapons Command awarded Wave Engine an order to develop the Versatile Air-Launched Platform (VALP). The contract value was $1 million; the timing of its implementation was not specified. It was reported that the goal of the project is to create a small-sized UAV with a thruster capable of carrying a small payload. In particular, the possibility of using it as a decoy to deceive enemy air defenses was considered.

By the time the contract for VALP was received, the development company had managed to formulate the general appearance of such a product and even published an artistic demonstration of its use. Subsequently, work on the project continued, but its results remain unknown. The finished UAV, similar to the 2021 pictures, has not yet been shown.


Engine type J-1

Results achieved


Despite the presence of an order for the development of a multi-purpose UAV, Wave Engine's main area of ​​activity remains the creation of pulsed air-breathing engines. To date, two such products have been developed with different characteristics, ready for use on aircraft of different weight categories. In addition, the appearance of new PuVRDs has been announced.

The company offers customers two engines. The first is designated J-1 and is intended for aircraft with a take-off weight of no more than 200 pounds (90,8 kg). It produces up to 55 lbs (25 kgf) of thrust. A similar K-1 engine has also been developed, characterized by increased dimensions and a thrust of 220 pounds (approx. 100 kgf). They are offered to equip aerial platforms weighing up to 1000 pounds (454 kg). It is assumed that the following samples of this family will surpass the K-1 product in their parameters.

Wave Engine ramjet engines are built using a valveless design, which simplifies the design and provides a long service life. The engine is made in the form of a U-shaped pipe of variable diameter. The upper part of such a device has a smaller diameter, but carries a cylindrical combustion chamber of increased cross-section. The lower pipe is made conical and has a larger diameter. The ends of the pipe serve as nozzles. An electronic control system has been developed specifically for the new series of engines, controlling fuel supply and overall operation.


Product K-1

The operating principle of such engines is quite simple. A portion of fuel is injected into the combustion chamber and ignition is performed. Combustion products flow through both pipe-nozzles directed towards the tail of the aircraft and create thrust. At the same time, at a certain point in time, the thrust in the lower pipe of a larger diameter exceeds the thrust in the upper one, and the latter begins to draw atmospheric air into the combustion chamber. Then a new fuel injection is made and the cycle repeats. Due to the absence of constant combustion and the use of successive flashes, such a VRD is called pulsating.

Experienced drone


For flight testing of the J-1 engine with 25 kgf thrust, Wave Engine developed an original unmanned aerial vehicle called Scitor-D. In early March, the company announced the start of its flight tests and published a video of the first flight. The tests will continue and will ensure testing of the design of the UAV and the PURD, as well as their interaction.

The Scitor-D UAV is built according to a normal aerodynamic design. It has an elongated fuselage of variable cross-section with internal compartments for payload, equipment and liquid fuel. The pulsating engine is placed above the fuselage using holding devices. A slightly swept wing is used, equipped with protruding fairings of the main landing gear. The tail unit is made in an H-shape and does not interfere with engine operation.


General view of the Scitor-D UAV

Takeoff weight drone determined by the parameters of the J-1 engine and is 100 lbs. A payload of 20 pounds (approx. 9 kg) can be carried on board. The dimensions of the product are not specified. The video shown suggests that the wingspan of the UAV reaches 3-3,5 m. The maximum flight speed is stated at 200 knots (370 km/h). The flight range and duration achieved by the unusual propulsion system are unknown.

At the moment, the experimental Scitor-D UAV carries a simplified set of on-board equipment. It ensures the reception and execution of operator commands, as well as the collection and transmission of data. In the course of further development, the drone may receive additional devices to solve practical problems. Due to its limited carrying capacity, the drone will only be able to carry optical or electronic reconnaissance equipment. Application weapons does not seem possible.

However, the main task of the Scitor-D product at the moment is not to conduct reconnaissance or perform other real tasks, but to demonstrate the capabilities of the PURD. With this development, Wave Engine wants to show the potential of such engines in general, as well as determine their real capabilities in the field of unmanned aviation. In essence, we are talking about an experiment and a kind of advertising of future developments in this area.


Scitor-D takes off

Characteristic Benefits


The valveless ramjet design being developed by Wave Engine has its own characteristic features that determine the achievable level of technical parameters and the potential in general. At the same time, a pulsating engine of such an architecture can compare favorably with power plants of other classes and types - and be of interest from the point of view of specific projects.

Like other jet engines, the PuVRD uses fuel energy quite efficiently, due to which it can develop high thrust. Thanks to this, the PURD allows higher speeds than an internal combustion engine with a propeller or an electric motor. In terms of thrust indicators and achieved flight performance characteristics, the PuVRD is close to turbojet engines. At the same time, its design is much simpler. There are no moving parts, the manufacture of which is a separate technological problem.

Thus, PURD can find application in those areas where sufficiently high thrust and flight characteristics are required, but at the same time it is necessary to simplify and reduce the cost of the design. North American Wave Engine Corporation believes that such engines should be implemented in the field of light and medium-sized UAVs. In addition, the company is clearly demonstrating the potential of this idea with a new prototype drone.

The experimental Scitor-D UAV is currently being tested and is helping to test the design of the J-1 product. It will also help the development of other engines of the promising line and the creation of new UAVs with PURD. In particular, it cannot be ruled out that the current pilot project is directly related to the previously launched VALP program and will contribute to the emergence of this multi-purpose platform. It is unknown when and how all this work will be completed, but the development company is optimistic and intends to continue its projects.
57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    15 March 2024 04: 15
    Yes, the cost of the motor, despite all its mediocre other characteristics, can be a decisive factor.
    1. +1
      17 March 2024 15: 10
      A system with such missiles can destroy stationary targets with cheap (by an order of magnitude) PUVRD missiles with a geranium/shahed type control module with a range of up to 500 km. Unlike "mopeds", these missiles fly quickly at about 850 km/h, which means the approach time to the target is 30-40 minutes. Warheads up to 700-800 kg. Unlike MLRS/OTRK missiles, they fly low and their launch is more difficult to detect.
    2. +2
      24 March 2024 12: 44
      Yes, the cheapness of the engine can make a difference. Only this “bent pipe through the knee” is unlikely to have good thrust. And the device takes off on its own with difficulty. What if there is a payload? You will have to “screw on” the accelerator. hi
      1. 0
        April 8 2024 08: 22
        Quote: fa2998
        this “pipe bent over the knee” is unlikely to have good traction.

        They just have very good traction. The thrust maneuver of the PuVRD is very poor, so their use on airplanes and conventional missiles did not work. In addition, they are unreliable and often burn out due to the high temperature in the working environment. But for UAVs... What’s strange is that they were remembered only now.
  2. +5
    15 March 2024 04: 20
    So, after all, such engines consumed an inhumane amount of fuel and the fuel + engine package turned out to be lighter only with a very short flight time. If a long flight is required, the efficiency decreases.
    1. +7
      15 March 2024 04: 33
      Here the PuVRD has an advantage over a conventional jet engine; it can operate not constantly, but sporadically, maintaining speed. For example, on gliders, acceleration with a climb, and then flight with periodic activation of the thruster. Taking into account that in PuVRD, there are no complex mechanisms, starting and stopping is a simple operation. hi
    2. +3
      24 March 2024 12: 39
      Quote: Sancho_SP
      So, after all, such engines consumed an inhumane amount of fuel and the fuel + engine package turned out to be lighter only with a very short flight time. If a long flight is required, the efficiency decreases.

      The V-1 easily delivered a ton of explosives to London! But they were shot down by air defense, both guns and fighters. And preference was given to the V-2.
      1. +1
        24 March 2024 23: 23
        Yeah, 250 km and delivered with a vehicle weight of two tons. In general, this is not enough.

        As for the V-2, the question is very ambiguous. V-1s were shot down mainly during the day and as single targets. The Germans simply did not live up to the idea of ​​massive night launches.
        1. +1
          April 8 2024 17: 52
          You're probably off topic! 50% warhead of the take-off weight is a LOT!!! In the same FAU-2, out of 14 tons, only 1 tons of warheads. In ICBMs 4-5%. In space 2-3%
          And they shot down V-1s A LOT. I don’t want to rummage through the data. Essentially (((TTX) this is an aircraft that does not maneuver at an acceptable speed, is not protected in any way and is not stable in flight. In general, the goal is to rock.
  3. +1
    15 March 2024 04: 39
    All aviation specialists know about these types of engines. But I practically looked at him for the first time.
    All this looks tempting.
    The question is how much better is it than a classic internal combustion engine with a propeller when used on light and medium-sized UAVs. Is the game worth the candle?
    The Iranians, as has already been written here, took a motor “from a moped” and it works great on thousands of UAVs.
    1. 0
      15 March 2024 05: 01
      So yes, but a “moped” has a speed of just over 100, and if they’re not lying, a power jet has a speed from 100 to 400, and a two-stroke aspirated aircraft will not fly high in altitude. There are questions regarding the duration and range with PuVRD, but again planning can greatly change this parameter. Experiments and experiments can only show this, but for UAVs the topic may be interesting. hi
      1. +1
        15 March 2024 06: 28
        Does a drone need a speed of 400 km? This is of course a question. But here's the height...
        It seems that now everything that flies has begun to huddle closer to Mother Earth. Even rockets.
    2. +1
      15 March 2024 05: 47
      Quote: U-58
      They took a motor “from a moped” and it works great on thousands of UAVs
      And how it works! True, they took it from the Chinese wink
      1. +1
        15 March 2024 07: 37
        But the Chinese stole it from the Germans and sold the license to the Iranians as if it were their own. laughing
    3. +2
      15 March 2024 11: 20
      Quote: U-58
      The Iranians, as already written here, took a motor “from a moped” and it works great on thousands of UAVs
      Would you like to take a look at “mopeds” with a jet engine?
      https://t.me/geran231/1544
      Geranium-236 is no longer a moped, and everything that is written here manages to grow old even before it is written. The filling sometimes changes 2-3 times a week (!) What they don’t use just for orientation (not everyone can sit on an inertial guidance system) including their hacked “Kyivstar” and even external surveillance cameras in Kyiv lol
    4. +2
      16 March 2024 16: 01
      Well, this engine is definitely cheap and has already been used for many years as a target in our country, and recently it has started popping up in SVO reports. (https://enics.aero/products/e95/)
  4. +3
    15 March 2024 05: 06
    This engine may be cheaper than a turbojet engine and more powerful than an electric one, but it also has disadvantages!!! It is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO of of of of of ofal to to0000 to to toe to see how big the dimensions of the final product!!!
    1. 0
      15 March 2024 05: 54
      Quote from BlacTiger74
      it finally increases the dimensions of the final product!!!

      It can be installed on unmanned gyroplanes and helicopters, thereby reducing their size and cost by replacing the wings and gearbox with a simple propeller. The pipe will be of a different shape to drive the screw.
      Well, you can cool it by placing it in a jacket with fuel.
      But noise reduction is more difficult.
      1. +1
        15 March 2024 06: 56
        Well, I don’t know, about cooling........ There the pipe gets red hot!!!
        1. +7
          15 March 2024 11: 01
          Quote from BlacTiger74
          There the pipe gets red hot!!!
          https://youtu.be/arEzIOj0BTI
          1. +5
            15 March 2024 13: 49
            It's not red anymore, it's white! It's 900 degrees! And the exhaust from the pipes is even hotter! There is no smell of high efficiency there! You can’t hide such a stove in a housing either, everything will burn or melt! The only niche for such devices is short-range disposable kamikazes, where the cost of the engine itself can be important from an economic point of view.
            1. 0
              15 March 2024 16: 09
              Yes, he plays with fire! White color is already more than 1000 and the strength is decreasing.
      2. +1
        15 March 2024 11: 25
        Quote: ycuce234-san
        But noise reduction is more difficult.


        What for? Under this noise, you can launch anything - if we are talking about noise direction finders.
        If we talk about the ability of radars to select targets by speed, it is possible to adjust the speeds of various aircraft in a swarm.
        If we talk about the IR signature, it is different - there are two sources of the jet stream, one of them glows more strongly and both pulsate.
    2. +1
      15 March 2024 09: 13
      Quote from BlacTiger74
      He's SOOOOOOO loud

      You say that this is a disadvantage? So, even a disadvantage can be turned to the benefit of... the military! For example, using the “loud” property of the PuVRD, they created an acoustic generator capable of influencing the human body, at best creating discomfort for it, and at worst.....! In Russia they have been working on PURD for a very long time....and a “model range” of UAVs with this engine (even with two) has been developed! But they work proactively, on their own pennies! The leading company in this field “complains” that it has “ideas” capable of creating “super.PuVRD” (for example, more powerful ones), but there are not enough funds (to quickly implement this), there are no orders from the Russian Ministry of Defense! By the way, Russian PuVRD engines were superior to similar engines in the European Union (France) at the end of the last century! There, in my opinion, they stopped developing PURD, considering turbojet microengines more promising! And once again about noise... using electronics with a “master” generator of the required frequency (20000 Hz and above), you can get a silent (or almost... wink ) engine!
      1. 0
        15 March 2024 11: 38
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        using electronics with a “master” oscillator of the desired frequency (20000 Hz and above)


        This generator should have more power than to muffle a battery-powered speaker.
        It is better then to use PURD in pairs, but operating in antiphase in sound.
      2. -2
        15 March 2024 12: 42
        I once read an article where ours were going to create a new generation fighter using a PuVRD!!! As far as I remember, that article talked about hyper speeds
        1. +4
          15 March 2024 13: 08
          Quote from BlacTiger74
          I once read an article where ours were going to create a new generation fighter using a PuVRD!!! As far as I remember, that article talked about hyper speeds
          It’s unlikely to be on a “PuVRD”, most likely on a ramjet engine (ramjet engine)
          1. 0
            15 March 2024 16: 58
            It is precisely pulsating, not direct flow!!!
            1. +1
              15 March 2024 19: 40
              Quote from BlacTiger74
              It is precisely pulsating, not direct flow!!

              You have slightly confused ... "a fork with a bottle"! Most likely, you wanted to talk about a direct-flow pulsating detonation engine (CPDE)! And this is “different”!
            2. 0
              16 March 2024 22: 44
              "On July 26, 1942, by GKO Resolution No. 2105ss, a decision was made to build a Project 156-P jet aircraft with a unique power plant by Plant No. 302 under the leadership of Chief Designer A.G. Kostikov. The uniqueness consisted of a combined power plant from a starting or accelerating liquid-propellant jet engine RD-1400, located in the rear of the fuselage on the frame beams, and two sustainer ramjet engines installed under the wings. A similar installation worked like this: a liquid engine accelerated the aircraft until it reached the operating altitude, and the other two engines were turned on "after the aircraft took off at an altitude of about 50 meters at a speed of at least 260 km/h "5". (c)according to agent Eustace
    3. +2
      15 March 2024 09: 26
      Quote from BlacTiger74
      He's SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

      Well, yes ! “Heat guns” for heating are made on the basis of PuVRD!
      PSUAV with 2 PURD......
  5. +2
    15 March 2024 05: 45
    This is the most dead-end road, which was abandoned back in the 50-60s. The only benefit from developing such engines is that the developers will gain good experience in R&D and subsequently use this experience to develop other products.
    1. +5
      15 March 2024 11: 56
      As the combat operations in the Ukrainian theater of operations have shown, the factor of mass production at low cost is one of the main ones.
  6. +2
    15 March 2024 09: 24
    Hello, Fau V1 laughing
    This type of engine (both valved and resonant) is perfect for the concept of suicide UAVs assembled on the knee. The engine is simpler and cheaper
    designs are impossible to come up with. However, such a miracle glows strongly enough for conventional MANPADS to operate on it, and the sound clearly and unequivocally warns operators. Any OLS will also happily capture such a target from maximum distances. Fuel efficiency is not good, but it will do for short flights (up to 200 km). Also, launch is possible either from a serious catapult or from an air carrier, because the static thrust is quite low.
    1. 0
      15 March 2024 09: 38
      If you take an engine with valves, then it is generally very compact, literally like the handle of a shovel, it can easily be placed anywhere inside the UAV,
      1. +4
        15 March 2024 09: 47
        If you hide it inside, then the huge heat flow will need to be put somewhere, and the engine will need to be thermally insulated from the airframe and the filling. But if the engine is thermally insulated, it will simply melt. Therefore, all viable designs are with an external engine.
        1. 0
          15 March 2024 17: 09
          You can place it in the air duct inside the case. This will greatly reduce radiation and noise.
          In fact, it can be used where there are vast distances and there is no risk of fires in ecosystems and noise pollution - over the sea, on the islands of Oceania, in the far north. Its fuel is all liquid that burns.
    2. 0
      23 March 2024 18: 51
      Any OLS will also happily capture such a target from maximum distances.

      Well, that's fine. What prevents them from being launched together with calibers? If you increase the speed. Excellent IR traps for their air defense. Overloading air defense also costs a lot! ))
  7. +2
    15 March 2024 09: 58
    The J-1 engine measures 5,5 x 12,5 x 64 inches (14 x 32 x 163 cm) and weighs 18 pounds (8,2 kg). It is reported to be capable of running on gas (87 octane), ethanol based biofuels (E85) and kerosene based fuels (Jet-A/JP-8) and is said to have demonstrated fuel efficiency rivaling turbine engines (less 2 lb/lbf-hr).
    Soooo, how much is this? lb/lb=kg/kg
    For aircraft engines, kilograms of fuel per kilogram-force per hour are used as a measure of fuel efficiency. For forced engines, this approximately corresponds to: 0,77 kg/(kgf·h) (RD-33 engine of the MiG-29 aircraft), 1,95 kg/(kgf·h) for the NK-22 engine of the Tu-22M2 aircraft, 2,08, 25 kg/(kgf·h) for the NK-22 engine of the Tu-3MXNUMX aircraft (for the latter - about a ton of kerosene per minute for each engine in afterburner).
    Farther.
    Also in development is the 1 lbf (220 N) K-978,6 engine, designed for aircraft weighing up to 1000 lb (450 kg).
    Source: North American Wave Motor Corporation
    Photo
    These days, the Enix company produces several models of reconnaissance drones, as well as targets for air defense, but unlike its former colleagues from Sokol, Enix’s feature is the PuVRD.
    illustrative.
    “I became interested in PUVRD back in 1961,” says Valery Pobezhimov, general director and chief designer of Enix JSC, “and since then I’ve been working mainly on it. The problem is that when the world's rocket and aviation industries switched to turbojet engines, interest in the pulse jet engine faded to almost nothing. Over the past decades, the turbojet engine has been brought to outstanding efficiency and fuel efficiency indicators, but no one, with rare exceptions, has been involved in fine-tuning the Puvrjet engine. This happened partly due to the fact that the turbojet engine is very complex from an engineering point of view, but simple from the point of view of studying the gas-dynamic processes occurring in it. With PuVRD everything is exactly the opposite.”
    1. 0
      15 March 2024 12: 21
      less than 2 lb/lbf-hour
      - 0.90/0.45 or almost 2 kg per 1 kg of thrust per hour...
      questionable savings.
      It looks like another cut and another “discovery of the century” of new technologies.
      The only plus is that you can do it on your knees in the garage.
      1. 0
        15 March 2024 13: 34
        Very noisy and hot, it doesn’t trudge very well, but it eats like it’s supersonic. Everything is like with the first turbines. The evolution of this direction was on pause. And actually, it’s not real: the looped direct-mode relatives of this drainpipe will now catch up with everyone in big jumps, first bypassing the Carnot turbo by a fifth, by a third, then jumping into space into orbit at one stage.
        It’s called the Wojciechowski engine, otherwise the foreigners have forgotten.
        https://hightech.plus/2023/12/19/ge-poprobuet-obedinit-detonacionnii-i-pryamotochnii-dvigateli-v-giperzvukovoi-rakete
  8. +2
    15 March 2024 10: 08
    For FAB with UMPC PuVRD is quite suitable. Maintaining gliding speed, the range is up to 200 km.
    Of the minuses: a strong IR trace, any missile with an IR seeker will target it without problems.
    You can launch the MA-31D first, for example. Air defense will work against them, and the second wave of FAB with UMPC PuVRD will reach the target.
  9. +2
    15 March 2024 11: 26
    I don’t see any advantages over the valve-type PuVRDs like on the V-1. The cost for equal thrust indicators of valved and valveless PuVRDs is also almost the same. In the past, such engines were made by children in flying clubs.
    Without valves, too, and a purely right-flow engine of the Lorin type. These were also made in the USSR in the past.
  10. +3
    15 March 2024 11: 32
    For mass kamikaze raids or decoy targets (which is probably more interesting), the engine is quite suitable - for simple UAV tasks such as transport or reconnaissance, it is definitely nonsense.
    Probably the enemy will consider this miracle precisely as a component in creating a mass of false targets.
    1. +1
      15 March 2024 11: 46
      So in the original article “in black and white”:
      Previously, the company, Wave Engine Corp., received US Air Force funding to develop a decoy powered by a pulsejet
    2. 0
      16 March 2024 23: 26
      That's right, all that remains is to calculate the difference in prices: pulsating, classic direct-flow and GradHurricaneSmerchi.
  11. 0
    15 March 2024 12: 23
    At the same time, at a certain point in time, the thrust in the lower pipe of a larger diameter exceeds the thrust in the upper one, and the latter begins to draw atmospheric air into the combustion chamber.

    In theory, backdraft should form.
  12. +1
    15 March 2024 13: 13
    The operating principle of such engines is quite simple. A portion of fuel is injected into the combustion chamber and ignition is performed. Combustion products flow through both pipe-nozzles directed towards the tail of the aircraft and create thrust. At the same time, at a certain point in time, the thrust in the lower pipe of a larger diameter exceeds the thrust in the upper one, and the latter begins to draw atmospheric air into the combustion chamber.

    I didn't really understand the process from this description. And I really don’t understand why they bent the engine with their knee.
  13. 0
    15 March 2024 13: 25
    As far as I know, we have already fully mastered this topic and even, as they say as usual, have surpassed it in some ways.
    And of course, in accordance with traditions, this development is still aging on the shelves, infused, gaining “momentum” in the process of natural aging of the samples themselves and their developers.
    We can’t do it any other way....s
  14. 0
    15 March 2024 13: 30
    A guy from Russia built such a pulse jet engine in his garage and carried out sea trials. . .now waiting for proposals from Russian companies. . .it's quiet for now. . .no offers. . . winked
    1. 0
      15 March 2024 16: 42
      Quote: vadimtt
      If you hide it inside, then the huge heat flow will need to be put somewhere, and the engine will need to be thermally insulated from the airframe and the filling. But if the engine is thermally insulated, it will simply melt. Therefore, all viable designs are with an external engine.

      I suspect that you have not seen it in person, the engine is certainly heating up, but it is still very far from the “huge heat flow”.
  15. 0
    15 March 2024 20: 36
    Any fuel is obtained, the main thing is that it burns. Here's a trivial question. If you inject something else in parallel with the fuel. What can actively evaporate. Not into the combustion chamber, but into the “pipe”. It is clear that this will lower the temperature but increase the “thrown mass”. By changing the diameter of the pipe, you can ensure that the speed does not decrease.
  16. 0
    15 March 2024 20: 54
    It’s interesting - if we go down the path of reducing the size and increasing the number of pipes, will the efficiency increase? A healthy trombone, white-hot, or a row of small tubes over the entire plane of the wing is one thing. I’m talking amateurishly, but when you switch modes in a shower head, you get the greatest traction on the largest number of small holes. At the same water pressure.
  17. 0
    15 March 2024 21: 25
    Dead end. I would rather believe in the Wankel aviation RPD. For disposable UAVs
    1. +1
      16 March 2024 14: 31
      To the author. It is clear that behind the hill everything is steeper. But we also need to talk about our geniuses. Our ramjet engines are no worse. We have such an organization - ENIKS. https://enics.aero/products/e95/
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. 0
    15 March 2024 22: 16
    An interesting video with a ramjet engine...
  20. 0
    24 March 2024 16: 57
    I have already commented on this topic.
    1. Computer control of injection (and possibly ignition) can increase engine efficiency significantly. The engine will be able to operate more efficiently in variable and off-design modes.
    2. The valve on the intake tract will allow you to rotate the air intake forward and also increase thrust. At speed, due to the speed pressure, the compression ratio and efficiency of the engine will increase, while the diagram shown in the photo will lose traction with increasing speed...
    .
    The cost of electronics today is pennies. But under time pressure, for the first time it is possible and necessary to make attack drones with a simple engine.
    I didn’t hear the main thing from the author: which engine is cheaper: piston or ramjet?