The British Army is mastering the SMASH X4 “smart sights”

59
The British Army is mastering the SMASH X4 “smart sights”
British fighter with an L85A3 rifle equipped with a SMASH X4 scope, 2022.


The British ground forces began to receive and develop previously ordered “smart sights” for small arms. weapons produced by SmartShooter. With the help of these devices they are going to improve the overall accuracy and efficiency of fire of existing automatic rifles. At the same time, the main task of the new sights will be to combat small unmanned aerial vehicles.



A modern solution


As one of the main allies of the Kyiv regime, Great Britain carefully monitors the progress of the current hostilities, and also collects and analyzes various information. In particular, already in 2022, the British military drew conclusions about the state and prospects of light unmanned aviation. In addition, they came to the conclusion that it was necessary to create or acquire specialized means to combat it.

In mid-2022, a possible solution to a new problem was found. As an air defense system, it was proposed to use standard L85A3 army automatic rifles, additionally equipped with computerized sights of the SMASH series from the Israeli company SmartShooter.

The British Army soon acquired several SMASH X4 devices for testing and evaluation. The tests took place at the base of the Yorkshire Infantry Regiment. Rifles with new sights were tested at shooting ranges and firing ranges. Test fighters fired at stationary and moving targets on the ground and in the air, independently or in groups.


Based on the results of such tests, foreign-made “smart sights” received high marks. Devices capable of independently calculating firing data have increased the accuracy and accuracy of fire in all conditions and situations. It was noted that with their help, even military personnel who are not required to have special skills in handling weapons according to the staffing schedule show good results.

Supply contract


Having shown good results in tests, the SMASH X4 sights received a recommendation for adoption. In the first half of 2023, the British Army carried out the necessary bureaucratic procedures, which resulted in the first contract for the supply of new devices. Its signing was announced at the end of June.

Due to the peculiarities of British legislation, the supplier under the new contract was not the SmartShooter manufacturer itself, but an intermediary in the person of Viking Arms Ltd. from Yorkshire. By the end of 2023, this organization was supposed to purchase 225 sights from SmartShooter and deliver them to the customer. The total cost of these products was 4,6 million pounds sterling (approx. 5,38 million euros) - 20 thousand pounds or 24 thousand euros each.

The first batch of 225 sights is intended for permanent readiness units of the ground forces. In the future, new purchases to equip other army units and formations are not excluded. In addition, SMASH X4 or similar devices in the future may enter service with the Marine Corps or rifle units of the RAF. Apparently, such prospects for “smart sights” will depend on the results of use in the ground forces.


At least some of the new sights were placed at the disposal of the 16th Airborne Brigade of the Ground Forces. Now its personnel are mastering new equipment and using it at the shooting range. Recently, photos from such a training session were published on the brigade’s official accounts on social networks. In particular, they showed shooting from a standard L85A3 rifle with a new sight at a small quadcopter.

Given the role of the 16th Brigade and its place in the British armed forces, we can expect that in the near future rifles with SMASH sights will appear on foreign training grounds as part of certain NATO exercises. In addition, such weapons can also be used in overseas operations of the British army. It is still unclear what results the new sights will show during exercises or other events.

Material part


SmartShooter Ltd. from the Israeli kibbutz Yagur has been working on the topic of computerized sights for small arms since the beginning of the tenth years. By the middle of the decade, it presented its first developments of this kind, suitable for use, and soon managed to receive orders for mass production and supply of sights.

To date, the company has developed and brought to market several “smart sights” under the general name SMASH. Products in this family are based on common solutions, components and algorithms. Moreover, each of them has its own characteristics and in one way or another differs from the others. Due to this, they are trying to expand the circle of potential buyers and increase their chances of winning new contracts.

The UK-procured SMASH X4 is an electronic small arms sight designed to improve accuracy and accuracy in all conditions. It is made in the form of a device in a complex-shaped body, mounted on a standard rifle rail. In addition, there is a remote control button for controlling the operation of the sight, placed on the forend. The length of the sight exceeds 200 mm, width (depending on the configuration) – 90-100 mm, height – 83 mm. When fully equipped, the device weighs 1,25 kg.


UAV shooting training

SMASH X4 is built on the basis of an optical sight with x4 magnification. This device is complemented by an optical-electronic system, a computing unit and a laser rangefinder (optional). At the shooter’s command, the automatic system tracks the target, measures the range to it and develops corrections for shooting. The result of the calculations in the form of an aiming mark at the optimal point is displayed in the main sight through the collimator.

The X4 Smart Sight is similar in functionality to other products in the SMASH series. However, it is distinguished by the use of an optical sight with magnification. According to the developer, the sight allows you to attack and hit ground targets at ranges of 400 m day and night. Provision is made for firing at air targets from a distance of up to 250 m.

The product runs on a built-in lithium-ion battery. One charge is enough for 72 hours of operation or 3600 shots using computing tools.

Sights for the troops


The first customer of “smart sights” from SmartShooter in 2018 was the Israeli ground forces. They purchased a number of devices of early modifications and introduced them into special forces and line units. Various sources previously mentioned the combat use of such devices, but the details are traditionally not reported.

In 2020-21 The Pentagon purchased a batch of SMASH products for testing and evaluation. Its tests included solving various fire tasks, incl. shooting at stationary and moving air targets. In general, Israeli sights confirmed their potential, and the possibility of their full-scale purchase for certain units and formations was considered.


SMASH X4 scope on an AR-like rifle. The device itself and the remote control are clearly visible

The second real customer for “smart sights” to be put into service is now Great Britain. Last year it issued an order, and now its troops are mastering new equipment. Interestingly, the British Army has its own views on the role and purpose of computerized sights. SMASH X4 products are considered, first of all, as an opportunity to combat the current threat in the form of UAVs.

This concept is of great interest. Light UAVs pose an obvious danger to troops, and effective and simple means are required to combat them. Nowadays, various electronic devices and weapons are used for this. As another way to solve this problem, small arms with special aiming devices are proposed, and the potential of such an idea has already been confirmed by tests.

Promising direction


The British military tested Israeli sights as a means of controlling anti-aircraft fire and were pleased. Now the devices are being introduced into combat units and will have to confirm their potential during future exercises. The appearance of the following contracts depends on these events. If SMASH X4 shows good results beyond the first tests, then new orders will appear for the supply of such products to other branches of the military.

The positive experience of the 16th Airborne Brigade and other units of the British Army may also be of interest to foreign armies. All developed armed forces, observing the events in Donbass, are now looking for ways to protect themselves from UAVs of all existing classes. The British Army, with its “smart sights,” can set a good example for them, which will spur the development of an interesting and promising direction.
59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    11 March 2024 05: 31
    What, in Israel there are no sympathizers with Russia, so that they could send a couple of such sights for review, the topic is directly over-relevant. Well, let our sight be one and a half to two times heavier, as long as it is.
    1. 0
      11 March 2024 06: 10
      I don’t think there is anything there that ours don’t know or couldn’t do. Another thing is that we have nothing and nowhere to make it. There may be such productions, there certainly are, but they are already busy. Because there are few of them left over the past years.
      1. IVZ
        -3
        11 March 2024 06: 36
        In Kazan they did something similar in the 2000s. for the "Burglar" (rifle "Kord" 12,7mm) - range 1000-1500m. I don’t remember much details, weight approx. I think 3,5kg. Why didn't you go? -???.
      2. 0
        11 March 2024 06: 38
        Quote: wlkw
        I don’t think there is anything there that ours don’t know or couldn’t do.

        Very often we reinvent the wheel, besides, I haven’t seen anything about such sights, but here there are already proven solutions, but I don’t insist.

        Quote: wlkw
        Another thing is that we have nothing and nowhere to make it. There may be such productions, there certainly are, but they are already busy.
        This is a different matter, but it means we need to expand production, or at least order it in advance, which is of course worse. But you must have a sample for production.
        1. +4
          11 March 2024 09: 04
          I think that the answer to the massive use of laser rangefinders on weapons will be the equally massive introduction of portable radiation detectors, such as on tanks. And then whoever gets there first will be there.

          By the way, this already exists, it’s called Spider. https://www.kalashnikov.ru/detektor-lazernogo-izlucheniya-pauk-zasvetilsya-na-ukraine/ Detects, analyzes and determines the direction of laser radiation from detection/targeting systems and rangefinders. For example, this is how it is attached to a helmet...
          1. +2
            11 March 2024 15: 06
            It seems that in short-range weapons lasers will be abandoned in favor of optical rangefinders, due to their passivity.
          2. -1
            11 March 2024 21: 15
            That you can measure range not by the target, but by the object next to it - it doesn’t occur to you? The M157 scope even allows you to select from a set of pre-measured distances without flashing. “Everything has already been invented before us.” ©
            1. 0
              11 March 2024 21: 17
              Well - if the target stands quietly next to the object... But for pre-measured distances such a thing is not needed - a long time ago they came up with a mil-dot reticle on a regular sight..
              1. 0
                11 March 2024 21: 30
                What - the target is faster than a bullet? Or do you think that modern cash registers work on wooden abacuses? You need to find out “pre-measured distances” from somewhere, no grid will help.
            2. 0
              April 14 2024 15: 09
              In the case of a UAV - for what “subject next to it”?
          3. +1
            12 March 2024 01: 16
            Quote: paul3390
            I think the answer to the massive use of laser rangefinders on weapons will be the equally massive introduction of portable radiation detectors, such as on tanks.

            And in response, it will be possible to place simple laser projectors along the LBS, like those used in clubs and at laser shows, which will randomly turn on and “scan” enemy trenches with a laser back and forth, causing constant activation of laser detectors.
            1. 0
              12 March 2024 02: 51
              What for ? You can also understand if a sniper rifle with manual input of corrections into the sight, from several kilometers away. And if the machine gun has an automated sight, then when the sensors detect something, you simply won’t have time to do ANYTHING. In general, judging by the comments (not just this article), most readers’ understanding of technology is, at best, at the level of the 70s.
              1. +1
                12 March 2024 11: 15
                Most readers' understanding of technology is at best at the level of the 70s

                When such performances were served.
                We saw a quadcopter and were stunned, wow, this is nanotechnology)
      3. +2
        11 March 2024 07: 10
        Quote: wlkw
        Another thing is that we have nothing and nowhere to make it.
        IMHO: there is FROM something - from any Chinese one, maybe the cheapest one, because after a little modernization he will become smarter than all the “British scientists” lol
        What you need: unscrew the sight and get to the board with the matrix. Remove the digital output wires from it (plug out). The optics of the sight itself are of little interest; it can only be used as a “cold sighting tube.”
        What do we do with digital? we put it on a ready-made Chinese control board for a hobby CNC machine. Two axes are enough, so there are only 2 linear guides (the notorious “cross”). And we attach it to a machine gun machine, for example, like what Rodriguez does for the DShK:
        https://t.me/nopasaranrus/4490
        Well, basically that’s all, all that remains is to add one more digital camera with broad overview which will drive the axes along given “sectors” (idle speed G00 for jumping from one target to another). And then you enter the necessary sectors in the program: for example, 60 degrees in the horizontal and 45 degrees in the angle of inclination. Activated the system - automatic and voila. The reaction is instant, the tripod just needs to be more stable... Oh, yes, the sight must have a rangefinder and limit the firing range, otherwise it will try to shoot down everything in the field of view. In short, primitive for today’s times, any schoolchild will do this in one evening, spending 30 thousand rubles. at home on my knees.
        1. +3
          11 March 2024 09: 59
          In words, everything is easy, but in reality, with just the electric trigger you will suffer. But you definitely have a plus for your creative approach.
          1. +2
            11 March 2024 14: 00
            Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
            in reality, with only one electric trigger you will suffer
            When they started installing gyroscopes on tanks to prevent the barrel from moving while moving, no one thought about an electric trigger at all. Still working in semi-automatic mode, and the gyroscope only stabilizes, keeps the gun on the target and nothing, somehow they live. The main thing is to start, and then improvements will naturally follow. Rome Wasn't Built in a Day (Rome was not built right away).
            1. 0
              11 March 2024 14: 03
              What are you doing, dear? The PKT has an electric trigger. How will your smart sight shoot? Will a finger come out of it and press the trigger? wassat Still, an actuator is needed.
              1. 0
                11 March 2024 14: 08
                Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
                Will a finger come out of it and press the trigger?
                To be honest, such little things as a banal ECCENTRIC (can be removable, universal for everything) are of little interest to me.
              2. +1
                11 March 2024 14: 24
                Here are the first available replacements for your finger:
                https://aliexpress.ru/item/1005006391605112.html
                https://aliexpress.ru/item/1005005694904892.html
                https://aliexpress.ru/item/1005001965254710.html
                Buy yourself at least one, play around and the childish questions will disappear on their own. I have boxes at home full of this kind of trash, and any eccentric or clamp for them is even printed on a 3D printer.
        2. 0
          11 March 2024 11: 04
          Quote: VPK-65
          All that remains is to add one more digital camera with broad overview which will drive the axes along given “sectors” (idle speed G00 for jumping from one target to another). .

          How will this get along with the vibration when shooting?
          1. +2
            11 March 2024 13: 28
            Quote from cpls22
            How will this get along with the vibration when shooting?
            Just like the impacts of the teeth of a milling machine cutter on steel “coexist” - you can’t hold anything there with your hands at all, and any machine, including a machine gun machine, reduces vibrations and barrel movement.
            Even in human hands:
            https://t.me/nopasaranrus/4472
            vs
            https://t.me/nopasaranrus/4434
            if it is not human hands, but is actually firmly fixed in a vice, then there will be no vibrations at all. The holding force depends on the power of the motor, for example, the weak Nema-17 from a 3D printer is certainly not enough, and the next standard size Nema-23 has a holding force of 25 kg, which, for example, with a 1:4 transmission will already give 100 kg. And you can barely withstand 100kg of blows with your bare hands. If you want more holding power, use Nema-34, etc. On any SD driver there are microstep switches, you can divide 1 degree with your hands into how many parts can you divide? and then the most antediluvian will be divided into 250 parts. So a person with such rigidity, accuracy and speed will never point the barrel at the target like a piece of iron. Of course, this will add about 10 kg to the weight of the tripod, but it is fully automatic. One of the disadvantages is that it will mow down all the black spots against the sky in a row. Even if a crow flies by. But in order to distinguish targets, sorry, you need AI (Artificial Intelligence), and this is time-consuming, expensive, and this will definitely never happen in front of every trench.
            1. 0
              11 March 2024 13: 47
              So you are offering a shooting machine, but we are talking about a sight. For a sight, it is important that the moving elements of the system do not suffer from overloads when fired. To do this, the optical elements or matrix need to be cushioned, and this cannot be done on your knee.
              1. 0
                11 March 2024 14: 52
                Quote from cpls22
                For a sight, it is important that the moving elements of the system do not suffer from overloads when fired. To do this, the optical elements or matrix must be damped
                Excuse me, which one are you? ready they wanted sights refine? For a children's pistol, what sprays water? Then yes, there will be problems. And if he already originally intended for installation on an automatic weapon, then the matrix in it is already a priori amortized. It was only about add digital output besides optics and that's it.
                1. 0
                  11 March 2024 15: 01
                  Quote: VPK-65
                  It was only about add digital output besides optics and that's it.

                  and about
                  add another digital camera of any kind with a wide view that will drive the axes along given “sectors”

                  Any one will not work here, it also needs to be depreciated.
                  Actually, this is what my remark was about..
                  1. +2
                    11 March 2024 15: 33
                    Now I understand, but this extra. There is no need to attach the camera to the weapon itself, it would look the same as if a sniper tried to attach an anemometer to himself lol
                    It is enough to place it in positions nearby and slightly adjust it - it is for coarse settings those. to find a target (the sight is aimed too narrowly, but here you need a 120-degree view). So this is just for sharp sector changes shooting and nothing more, so great accuracy is not needed here - stuck it on a rod into the ground, adjusted it a little mechanically and it will do.
        3. 0
          11 March 2024 19: 19
          Probably, the presence of ultra-small or small microcircuits will be of great importance here. We are still producing large ones. And this means more power, more weight, and larger batteries. Actually, similar things have been known since World War II. At the end of World War II, the Germans began to use SON and PUAZO in anti-aircraft fire, and of course they measured the range not with a laser, but with a radar. The equipment, of course, was lamp-based and housed in trailers. At the end of the war, the Red Army received these SON and POISO as trophies. According to the recollections of our pilots of the TU-2 and PE-2 dive bombers at the end of the war, they suffered the main losses from anti-aircraft fire.
          1. 0
            11 March 2024 22: 51
            Quote: Alexey Lantukh
            Probably here will be of great importance the presence of ultra-small or small microcircuits.
            In this case, will be of great importance just laziness, everything else can be assembled in an hour by a 10 year old child (even a soldering iron is not required).
            Do you want to try collecting virtually using the links?
            We google spare parts like this: "buy components for cnc" and take from the search any 5-6 sites in the top line. For you, I’ve already taken the top line as an example:
            https://cnc-tehnologi.ru/komplektuyushchie-k-chpu
            Choose engine
            https://cnc-tehnologi.ru/shagovye-dvigateli-serii-nema-23/shagovyj-dvigatel-57hs115-4204-001a
            Choose motor driver
            https://cnc-tehnologi.ru/odnokanalnye-drajvery-shd-analog-leadshine/dm542
            Choose optocoupler board
            https://cnc-tehnologi.ru/chpu-kontrollery-i-perekhodniki/plata-lpt-zelenaya
            A typical cheat sheet (knowledge of circuit design is not necessary):
            http://shagovik.ru/index.php?route=information/articles&articles_id=2
            Screwdriver assembly-twist according to the picture:
            https://www.cnc-club.ru/forum/download/file.php?id=34202=view
            Each wire is marked with a color, so even a child can’t miss it. A switching power supply is not needed in a trench, a battery is enough (power supply from 12 to 48 volts), you can take a tank battery from a damaged tank (they seem to be 24V?). The higher the power, the faster the engines turn. I almost forgot, you can also buy these ready-made components from the Chinese on Aliexpress for about 2 times cheaper...
            1. 0
              12 March 2024 11: 51
              Are you talking about drones? And I’m talking about smart, lightweight compact sights that automatically track in different atmospheric and night conditions, and this is not air defense tracking. Well, about those batteries: in the army, two people could barely carry them to recharge.
      4. 0
        11 March 2024 09: 16
        Another thing is that we have nothing and nowhere to make

        Well, there are places to make new heaters. 1PN154, a new product, and for now secret, which is creepy. Somewhere it is possible that R&D on smart sights is in the works. Or maybe not.
      5. 0
        12 March 2024 17: 32
        There was a great review of these scopes about a year ago.
    2. +1
      11 March 2024 10: 28
      Read VO - they wrote about the Russian smart sight here in 2018, I think.
      And it was a real-life device.
      1. +2
        11 March 2024 10: 45
        Quote: Bolt Cutter
        Read VO - they wrote about the Russian smart sight here in 2018, I think.
        And it was a real-life device.

        2016, and an expensive thermal imaging sight, I think it would cope with an aerial target of an imp FPV drone.
        https://topwar.ru/97759-icnayper-test-rossiyskogo-umnogo-pricela.html?ysclid=ltmmwrm6pa829667140
    3. +3
      11 March 2024 11: 12
      First, we need to ensure that cartridge factories produce 100% standardized ammunition. Otherwise, in one box there is such a range in size that there is no need to talk about any kind of targeted shooting at all. Accuracy, of course, depends on the weapon, but the quality of the ammunition plays an important role here.
      пример здесь - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzX5QWurDsc&pp=ygVE0L7RgtCy0LXRh9Cw0LXRgiDRgNCw0LfRgNCw0LHQvtGC0YfQuNC60LLQuNC90YLQvtCy0LrQuCDQvtCx0LDQtdCy0LA%3D
      1. -3
        11 March 2024 17: 12
        Quote: Maluck
        Accuracy, of course, depends on the weapon, but the quality of the ammunition plays an important role here.

        You don’t see the difference between a machine gun and a sniper rifle, do you?
        1. +1
          11 March 2024 17: 42
          You don’t see the difference between a machine gun and a sniper rifle, do you?

          What kind of difference is this that allows us to justify the poor quality of gross cartridges?
          1. 0
            12 March 2024 06: 51
            Quote: Nefarious skeptic
            What kind of difference is this that allows us to justify the poor quality of gross cartridges?

            There is no excuse for low quality, but what is critical for high-precision weapons is acceptable for mass-produced automatic weapons for medium distances and average shooters.
            1. 0
              12 March 2024 08: 46
              If the cartridges are crooked, then the sight will not help, no matter how “curly” it is....
              1. -1
                12 March 2024 09: 01
                Quote: Maluck
                If the cartridges are crooked, then the sight will not help, no matter how “curly” it is....

                If the scope is designed for 500 m, and the cartridges are crooked at 700 m, then everything is fine. So, you don’t understand the difference between a machine gun and a sniper rifle?
            2. 0
              12 March 2024 09: 57
              this is acceptable for mass-produced automatic weapons for medium distances and medium shooters.

              Why?
              PS By the way, what you are trying to find out from your interlocutor about knowing the “difference between a machine gun and a sniper rifle”, if I were you, I wouldn’t do it, you can put yourself at a disadvantage in the dispute)))
              1. 0
                12 March 2024 10: 16
                Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                Why?

                You can refute it.
                Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                PS By the way, what you are trying to find out from your interlocutor about knowing the “difference between a machine gun and a sniper rifle”, if I were you, I wouldn’t do it, you can put yourself at a disadvantage in the dispute)))

                It makes absolutely no difference what you do there, you won’t.
                1. 0
                  12 March 2024 10: 48
                  You can refute it.

                  Can't you explain your own statement?
                  1. 0
                    12 March 2024 11: 36
                    Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                    Can't you explain your own statement?

                    Justify your claim first.
                    1. -1
                      12 March 2024 11: 45
                      Justify your claim first.

                      Where did you see the claim, in the usual question “Why?” smile
                      Don't look for a catch everywhere.
                      1. 0
                        12 March 2024 11: 52
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        Where did you see the claim, in the usual question “Why?” smile
                        Don't look for a catch everywhere.

                        Don't rinse your brains.

                        Quote: Vladimir_2U
                        There is no excuse for low quality, but what is critical for high-precision weapons is acceptable for mass-produced automatic weapons for medium distances and average shooters.

                        Once again, what is the claim to this phrase?
                      2. 0
                        12 March 2024 11: 59
                        Don't rinse your brains.

                        I didn’t even think.
                        Not every question is a complaint. In case you didn't know.
                        I had a simple question - Why (acceptable for mass-produced automatic weapons for medium ranges and medium shooters)?
                        If you don't want to answer, don't answer. But there is no need to invent complaints. Yes
                      3. 0
                        12 March 2024 12: 08
                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        Not every question is a complaint. In case you didn't know.

                        Given in this form - a claim. In case you don't understand.

                        Quote: Nefarious skeptic
                        I had a simple question - Why (acceptable for mass-produced automatic weapons for medium ranges and medium shooters)?



                        Read it again, in full, here is actually the answer to your question:
                        Quote: Vladimir_2U
                        but what is critical for high-precision weapons is acceptable for mass-produced automatic weapons for medium distances and average shooters.


                        And let me remind you, in case you didn’t notice, we are talking about a sight with a range of up to 400 m for conventional targets and up to 250 for air targets.
    4. +3
      11 March 2024 16: 25
      I think that after the Hamas attack on October 07 and immediately after the attack, the arrival of all terrorist organizations such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad - these enemies of Israel in Moscow and their acceptance into the Russian Foreign Ministry, there was NO ONE left in Israel who would like to help the Russian Federation.
      1. -2
        11 March 2024 17: 13
        Quote: vadim dok
        I think that after the Hamas attack on October 07 and immediately after the attack, the arrival of all terrorist organizations such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad - these enemies of Israel in Moscow and their acceptance into the Russian Foreign Ministry, there was NO ONE left in Israel who would like to help the Russian Federation.

        Is it unknown that in Israel itself not everyone believes that Hamas are terrorists like you? Where...
    5. The comment was deleted.
  2. 0
    11 March 2024 05: 53
    You scribblers, try shooting at a drone, one is carrying a charge, the other is aiming artillery at a speed of 100 km and at an altitude of a kilometer. Britons from the Yankees respond positively, but how does the Israeli product work at sub-zero temperatures? One of their golems knows.
  3. 0
    11 March 2024 07: 25
    Amers are already introducing this as a series, about 4 years ago I looked at Discovery, the target is marked, and the shot occurs when the target and the line of sight coincide, the computer calculates everything. There you stupidly take the machine gun around the corner and point it here and there in the direction of the target, you don’t even need to look, and then suddenly boom. The thing is great!
    1. -8
      11 March 2024 08: 57
      Yes - as long as it works.. But when it shuts down or the battery dies, the shooting begins; after all, the fighter was never taught how to shoot from mechanical open ones..
  4. +2
    11 March 2024 08: 49
    ...The second real customer for “smart sights” to be put into service is now Great Britain.

    OMG
    Actually, it started in Denmark, and the news about the sight has already been around for 3 (three) years.
    Who cares about such details, here, finally, is an article on VO.

    And a little video

    https://youtu.be/FRg7KPRMrCY


    https://youtu.be/91sf7B6WpbI
  5. -2
    11 March 2024 11: 49
    Well, they will introduce “butterfly mode” into the drone flight program and no smart sight will cope with it....
    1. 0
      11 March 2024 18: 40
      Well, they will introduce “butterfly mode” into the drone flight program and no smart sight will cope with it...

      The battery will drain a little faster...
      1. 0
        11 March 2024 19: 33
        On the contrary, it's slower.
        1. 0
          12 March 2024 15: 15
          The battery will drain a little faster...

          On the contrary, it's slower.

          Is it slower when maneuvering in butterfly mode?
          Clarify please...
    2. 0
      11 March 2024 21: 23
      Do not compare the reaction speed of the sight (I will keep silent about the speed of the bullet) and the maneuverability of the FPW drone. No amount of engines will help - it will simply fall apart from overloads.
      1. 0
        12 March 2024 12: 19
        You forgot to include human reaction speed here. The bullet flies relatively straight, and maneuvering can be done with rudders.
  6. 0
    15 March 2024 07: 00
    It makes sense to talk about short-sighted soldiers in the army. This may be 30 percent. Without an optical sight, they shoot poorly, because even with excellent glasses their eyes “sag.” At the same time, with a sight with an LCD screen, they see perfectly without glasses.