Hypersound bet

8
Progress in the field of creating hypersonic transport and armaments in recent decades has demonstrated such a modest pace that it turned even ardent optimists into gloomy skeptics. Nevertheless, the newest plan of R & D of the US Air Force confidently asserts: the current hypersonic weapon will appear at the disposal of the States already in 2020 year.

Half a century has already passed since the USSR and the USA realized the potential of hypersonic weapons and began searching in this direction. From the exotic ASALM strategic missile project of the late 1970s to recent flights drone-demonstrator Boeing X-51A has passed more than 30 years, and it was still not possible to achieve stable operation of a ramjet engine at hypersonic speeds. This area of ​​research is showing discouragingly slow progress. However, the US Air Force has released a new strategic plan for R&D, and it clearly shows that speed remains one of the top priorities of the US military.

This time the plan is measured not in years, but in decades. However, the design tasks and deadlines for their implementation are indicated in it with the utmost precision, and the financial part of the strategy involves the necessary investments, even in spite of difficult times.
The current strategy has two main time horizons. Already by 2020, it is planned to develop a hypersonic strike armament, that is, a cruise missile with a hypersonic ramjet engine.

By 2030, a reconnaissance aircraft, probably piloted, should be born. “We consider these terms reasonable in terms of investment,” says Christopher Clay, a specialist in the Air Force’s R & D unit, “but in case of urgent need we can accelerate.”

The protagonists, of course, will be the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) and the Agency for Advanced Defense Research and Development DARPA. A number of foreign developers will join them. It is planned to use the developments of all projects that have ever been conducted, but were closed, canceled or suspended due to lack of funds.

These include the X-51A, which so far has measured the last test flight, and the Blackswift project, which is closed for financial reasons, is a unique aircraft with a hybrid power plant combining a turbojet engine and a scramjet in one unit.

“A number of projects have been launched in the AFRL, but none of them have gained critical mass. Therefore, it was decided to choose only two and concentrate entirely on them, ”explains Clay. And the first and previously developed at a good pace, but the second for many years trampled in one place.

A quick death

The first, relatively successful project implies the Boeing X-51A. Despite only one half successful and two unsuccessful flights of the scramjet demonstrator, it is still planned to build the fourth and final sample by the middle of 2013. “Leadership in the field of air power is still dependent on research in the field of scramjet,” said Charlie Brink, program manager for X-51A. “The image of a vehicle capable of flying 600 nautical miles in ten minutes is gaining more and more weight in the eyes of the military.”

In May 2010 of the year, during the first flight of the X-51, its engine ran for 140 seconds from the planned 300. Damage to the connection between the engine and the nozzle led to a premature termination of the flight, but the scramjet managed to accelerate the car to 6,5 M. During the second flight in June, the rocket engine of the accelerating stage did not start, and the August third ended with loss of control due to the steering failure. By the fourth flight, all identified defects should be corrected.

“The fact that funding was found in the X-51A crisis conditions underlines the level of interest in hypersound,” Brink says. It is he who will lead the development of the hull and engine in the HSSW high-speed strike weapons project.

The culmination of the demo program, which starts in March 2013, should be military exercises by the end of the decade. "We are striving to start flying already in 2017, and if everything goes well, they will continue in 2018 and 2019," said Christopher Clay, specifying that everything is planned to be six to seven flights. The key task of these tests is to gain practical experience in various aspects of hypersonic technology, from engines to guidance systems. The purpose of the demo program is to successfully hit targets thousands of miles away.

Prototypes will need to demonstrate not only an accurate strike, but also compatibility with existing aviation systems. The device will be placed both in the bomber compartment and under the wing of the fighter. Advanced guidance systems, warheads with a different nature of destruction, as well as effective disposable propulsion systems for booster stages will be developed.

For the first time, a plan to develop high-speed weapons provides for some of the international cooperation. The field for joint work can be the development of compact boosters - one of the key technologies of the plan for high-precision weapons. Other areas of possible cooperation are guidance systems operating in a wide range of speeds, high-speed orientation systems in the absence of GPS and satellite communications, aerodynamic configurations, composite materials, and thermal protection systems.

Most of the technical requirements for the project are formulated on the basis of a detailed analysis of the likely combat missions. However, the main ones are very simple and obvious - it is light weight and moderate cost. The price of new weapons should not exceed the cost of conventional subsonic weapons more than doubled. At the same time, it should hit remote targets in a matter of minutes. The HSSW prototype will be based on the Eglin Air Force Base in Florida.

Transitional age

For the second project - a hypersonic reconnaissance-strike aircraft - the Air Force outlined the requirements no less clearly. It must be absolutely self-sufficient in the conditions of inaccessibility of the navigation and communication satellites, accelerate to speeds above 5 M and at the same time take off independently from the usual runway.

Since 2010, US Air Force strategists have been aiming at Mach 4. However, the repeated analysis of possible combat missions with the use of a hypersonic aircraft led to an unambiguous increase in the desired speed to at least 5 M. I had to start searching for technologies that would allow to achieve this goal.
The project of a manned aircraft is much more expensive and risky than the HSSW. It requires the development of an engine that can function at subsonic, supersonic, and hypersonic speeds.

During takeoff, it will work as a turbojet, then go into direct mode, and when switching to hypersound, turn into a scramjet.
Trying to realize such a motor, the creators of the Blackswift project at one time faced the main problem: the turbine of the subsonic engine does not withstand the temperatures associated with the movement on the hypersonic.

Of course, the hypersonic flow does not pass through the turbine directly, but even the neighborhood with the scramjet acts on the delicate node is detrimental. Therefore, the focus of research to be done on heat-resistant materials, including composites with a ceramic matrix, and the system of distribution and dissipation of thermal energy.

A valid engine must be developed by 2020. Despite the negative result of past tests, their analysis suggests that the program is quite realizable. Flight tests will take place with a full engine mounted in a reduced-size fuselage. The device will become a test platform for many other systems: control mechanisms, navigation and guidance, new materials, sensors.

“The most difficult technological challenge is to switch to hypersound. We have to explore the possibilities of refinement of standard turbo engines available for sale in order to expand their speed range. It is necessary to work on the scramjet, on the contrary, to reduce its minimum speed.

- While we can not force the speed ranges of the turbine and scramjet at least a little intersect, - says Christopher Clay. “But we have to design and test much larger scramjet, in 8 and even 16 times the power of X-51A.”

The X-51A experience has shown that technology can be well recognized only during real flights. Thousands of talented theoretical engineers will not replace the prototype test launch. The plan of the US Air Force, including financial, this fact takes into account. So within the next decade we will see a lot of interesting flights.



The development of a manned hypersonic aircraft will require the creation of a complex engine that combines a turbojet engine for subsonic and supersonic speeds, as well as a scramjet for hypersound. Work on this engine will require the development of at least four key technologies.

Hypersound bet

An experimental NASA X-43 drone set a speed record for aircraft with an air-jet engine, speeding up to 10617 km / h, or 9,68M. The record flight of the third X-43 prototype took place on November 16 of the year 2004. The Pegas accelerating rocket launched from the B-52 bomber dispersed the vehicle and separated at 29000 m. In 10 seconds of the scramjet X-43 overcame 24 km, rising to an altitude near 34000 m. Then, the disposable device was submerged in a calorie from calipers using calipers for XNUMX m. coast.


In the photo: the device HiFiRe was a logical continuation of the Australian program HyShot. Unlike its predecessor, he demonstrated an independent, long flight with the current scramjet.
8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. to water
    -1
    5 February 2013 11: 38
    No missile can handle such missiles. This is the equivalent of a nuclear weapon, which has a tremendous advantage in time when striking an enemy. And our developments in this direction are invisible. Not a bright future for us.
    1. +2
      5 February 2013 11: 55
      Quote: regar
      And our developments in this direction can not see.

      bully
      1. 755962
        +5
        5 February 2013 13: 05
        Quote: regar
        And our developments in this direction are invisible

        Russia will test a hypersonic rocket in 2013
        The Russian Ministry of Defense has determined the timing of the first full-fledged test launches of a promising hypersonic missile capable of speeds up to five Mach numbers (about 5,8 thousand kilometers per hour). As the newspaper "Izvestia" writes, tests are scheduled for July-August 2013; they will be produced at the Akhtubinsk test site in the Astrakhan region.

        The project of creating a hypersonic missile is classified, so neither its code, tasks, nor tactical and technical characteristics are known. The first missile tests took place at the Akhtubinsk training ground in 2012, but they cannot be called full-fledged. During inspections, the rocket detached from the aircraft suspension, started its own engine, flew several kilometers at subsonic speed and landed.

        The development of hypersonic missiles has been actively carried out in the USSR since the 1970s, but in the 1990s it practically disappeared. In particular, NPO Mashinostroyenia created the Meteorite rocket, and later began work on an apparatus with the code 4202. MKB "Raduga" in the 1980s began the project GELA X-90. In the 1970s, on the basis of the S-200 missile, the Kholod rocket was created, which was able to reach a speed of six thousand kilometers per hour.

        At present, NPO Mashinostroyenia is participating in the joint development of the BrahMos hypersonic cruise missiles with India, capable of speeds up to five Mach numbers. In addition, the Tactical Missile Armament Corporation is developing a missile capable of speeds 12-13 times the speed of sound.

        In September last year, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin announced that it was planned to create a "super holding" in the country that would develop hypersonic technologies. The holding is expected to include the TRV Corporation and NPO Mashinostroyenia.

        http://lenta.ru/news/2013/01/14/hypersonic/
        1. postman
          +1
          5 February 2013 14: 11
          Quote: 755962
          hypersonic rocket in 2013

          Hardly.
          there were no flights. on an empty place for months you will not do
          device for studying hydrogen combustion at supersonic speeds (TsIAM, 2004)

          Scramjet engine on the model of GLL "Igla" (TsIAM, 2004)

          model of bucket supersonic air intake (TsIAM, 2008)


          Quote: 755962
          Russian Ministry of Defense

          http://www.newsfiber.com/p/s/h?v=EBfPK2TNLMwI%3D+nrB%2BGxpjjrQ%3D
          What tape, what fiber, they’ll write something else

          Quote: 755962
          created the Meteorite rocket,
          -: 3m

          Quote: 755962
          apparatus with the code "4202
          And what kind of apparatus is this?

          Quote: 755962
          started the GEL X-90 project.

          - 2004 - in some of the media mentions the successful launch of the "X-90 hypersonic cruise missile with the Tu-160M" (for example). This event is an accidental hoax or intentional distortion. because never happened and could not happen.

          Quote: 755962
          cruise missiles BrahMos

          The Defense Research and Development Organization (DRDO) recently showed a model of a hypersonic technology demonstrator - the Hypersonic Technology Demonstrator Vehicle (HSTDV). It is designed in cooperation with the Israeli company IAI. If you believe the DRDO information, then TsAGI and CIAM are involved in these works regarding the development of the CS and diffuser (!). Test apparatus scheduled for 2009. But they were not there!
          The optimist Sivathanu Pallai said that the BrahMos-2 missile defense system would be created "in the variants of ground, air, surface and underwater basing, and their development will presumably take about five years." (post from 2008)

          HSTDV is still just a mockup

          Quote: 755962
          Russia Dmitry Rogozin announced that the country is planning to create a "super holding"

          This (superholding) is likely to be completed by 2013, our leadership gravitates towards pomp
          1. postman
            0
            5 February 2013 14: 13
            Indian Data (DU)

            It should not be assumed that the KR "Bramos-2" will be, as stated, the development of the supersonic rocket "Bramos"

            At a press conference were demonstrated slides under the heading “The scramjet combustion chamber is tested for a hypersonic missile”



            , depicting bench tests of model scramjet engine of two types - on hydrogen fuel and on kerosene. According to the information distributed during the presentation, the tested samples of the scramjet engine were 85x40 mm in cross section. During testing, the following parameters were obtained. Supersonic combustion in CS with a speed of about M = 2,2, in regimes corresponding to flight conditions with Mach numbers of about 6,5 at altitudes up to 30 ... 35 km. The combustion temperature in the compressor station is 1670 K, and the pressure is 15 atmospheres. These data are almost identical to those previously reported on the HSTDV topic.
        2. to water
          +4
          5 February 2013 14: 27
          X-90 is the development of Soviet scientists with a cruising speed of 4-5 Mach. The development of BRAMOS in my opinion is a modernized version of the X-90. The Americans in 2004 dispersed their X-43A to a speed of Mach 9,6. I can imagine how they have progressed now. In general, they swing at speeds of up to 18 Mach on their cruise missiles. In addition to old projects, nothing is visible here. I am happy for your optimism and if I am mistaken, I will rejoice with you, but the fact is that such high-tech things are not created overnight, even if you have money and desire. When the continuity of specialists was lost, there was a technological gap in the materials that are used in such products, it is impossible to create a modern model. Sorry, but miracles do not happen. Behind every modern weapon lies the titanic work of several dozens, if not hundreds, of modern industrial enterprises and laboratories.
          1. yurasumy
            +2
            6 February 2013 12: 46
            I am confused by another circumstance. In principle, there is no secret in the fact that the 80s of the USSR in hypersonic development ahead of the US very much. Why did the work stop? That is the question that torments me. Poor financing did not prevent the development of a 5th generation fighter. With hypersound, the cost of research programs is an order of magnitude lower (in the United States, exactly. At least at this stage). I have a version that in the USSR they got some results on hypersound back in the 80s and therefore stopped working in this direction (in principle, work on hypersound was somewhat sluggish in the late 80s.) Again, the question of choosing a concept device. All real work in the USSR (which ended successfully) stopped at around 4M. This is not hypersound. Everything new that is being offered now is 5-6 M. It seems to me that this is no accident. In addition to speed characteristics, weapons also have others (controllability, accuracy, PRICE, etc.). Let us dwell on the listed.
            CONTROLLABILITY AND ACCURACY. How to control a hyper weapon? (The United States has not even come close to this yet. They have not even worked out the issue of controllability in metal. They would be able to cope with the stability of the engine until 2020). Let's come from the side of technology management. At speeds of 5-6 M, you can still get by with modern well-developed communication systems, although there are a lot of questions about them. But they are at least technical, not conceptual. At speeds already 10M, the issue of control technology is fundamental. At such speeds, modern means of communication will not be able to control using an external signal (please do not confuse with spacecraft. There are no problems associated with thermal heating of the device in dense layers of the atmosphere, therefore, communication works fine). In the case of flying at speeds of 10 M, modern electronics will not be able to work purely theoretically (in the sense of external control and target designation). If we consider the work with the internal control of the device, then some questions will be removed (in principle, you can put the control unit and protect it from heat). But the following arise. All modern missiles correct the flight path (either using an external source or using an internal one). We will not talk about the external. The picture is clear. How about the inside? There is also a blank wall on a modern technological base. At speeds of 10 M, the device flies in an ionized cloud that does not transmit radio waves (such protection is assumed on Russian aircraft from enemy missiles).

            But in this case, it is impossible to obtain data on the correction (in fact, external guidance of the device is not possible for this). There is only one way to use it. Lay down the coordinates of the target before turning on the hypersonic engine and hope that the object will not have time to leave or evade an approaching missile. But if the flight of a rocket is measured in minutes, then this weapon is clearly not tactical, but strategic, which can only be used against stationary missiles. It will not threaten the same mobile "Topols" or "Yars" in the foreseeable future. About tanks, self-propelled guns and aircraft, I generally keep quiet. This weapon is not against them. Yes, destroying a terrorist's house is not a question. But the UAV can easily cope with this. Apparently back in Soviet times, Soviet designers faced this conceptual problem and refused to continue work in this direction. Why did they refuse to work on hyperweapons with speeds of 5-6 M? I can only give you a version. What was created in the 80s and so ahead of the US weapons by a generation. Therefore, there was no need to invest huge sums when the USSR was already experiencing financial hunger.
            1. yurasumy
              0
              6 February 2013 12: 47
              But in this case, it is impossible to obtain data on the correction (in fact, external guidance of the device is not possible for this). There is only one way to use it. Lay down the coordinates of the target before turning on the hypersonic engine and hope that the object will not have time to leave or evade an approaching missile. But if the flight of a rocket is measured in minutes, then this weapon is clearly not tactical, but strategic, which can only be used against stationary missiles. It will not threaten the same mobile "Topols" or "Yars" in the foreseeable future. About tanks, self-propelled guns and aircraft, I generally keep quiet. This weapon is not against them. Yes, destroying a terrorist's house is not a question. But the UAV can easily cope with this. Apparently back in Soviet times, Soviet designers faced this conceptual problem and refused to continue work in this direction. Why did they refuse to work on hyperweapons with speeds of 5-6 M? I can only give you a version. What was created in the 80s and so ahead of the US weapons by a generation. Therefore, there was no need to invest huge sums when the USSR was already experiencing financial hunger.
              1. yurasumy
                0
                6 February 2013 12: 48
                We are smoothly moving on to the question of the PRICE of such weapons. It is clear that weapons with a speed of 5-6 M are an order of magnitude cheaper than weapons with speeds of more than 10 M. My question is whether Russia should start a project on the existing technological base. which smacks of the usual "satisfying the curiosity of scientists for budget money" with very unclear prospects. The USA cannot bring to mind the F-22 and F-35. So there are much less conceptual problems. Moreover, the F-22, if my memory serves me, has been brought up for 20 years already, well, at least with problems, it flies, although again they are afraid to use it in battle. In my opinion, the United States did not have such problems before. F-15 appeared and immediately went into battle. And the F-35 is over 10 years old and it won't fly. I think that with the design approaches that are now used in the United States (there, the degradation of the engineering school has gone further than ours, despite the funding), they will never bring hyperweapons to combat-ready models (well, certainly not in 2020). And even if it does go into service, then the price and effectiveness of this weapon will be disproportionate.
            2. yurasumy
              0
              6 February 2013 12: 56
              We are smoothly moving on to the question of the PRICE of such weapons. It is clear that weapons with a speed of 5-6 M are an order of magnitude cheaper than weapons with speeds of more than 10 M. My question is whether Russia should start a project on the existing technological base. which smacks of the usual "satisfying the curiosity of scientists for budget money" with very unclear prospects. The USA cannot bring to mind the F-22 and F-35. So there are much less conceptual problems. Moreover, the F-22, if my memory serves me, has been brought up for 20 years already, well, at least with problems, it flies, although again they are afraid to use it in battle. In my opinion, the United States did not have such problems before. F-15 appeared and immediately went into battle. And the F-35 is over 10 years old and it won't fly. I think that with the design approaches that are now used in the United States (there, the degradation of the engineering school has gone further than ours, despite the funding), they will never bring hyperweapons to combat-ready models (well, certainly not in 2020). And even if it does go into service, then the price and effectiveness of this weapon will be disproportionate.
            3. 0
              7 February 2013 06: 16
              Quote: yurasumy
              then this weapon is clearly not tactical, but strategic, which can only be used with fixed missiles
              The United States is trying to avoid a retaliatory strike in the event that it uses nuclear weapons. For this purpose, this miracle is created.
              Quote: yurasumy
              At speeds of 10 M, the device flies in an ionized cloud that does not transmit radio waves

              They still cannot cope with this problem, and more than one rocket has already been drowned at the initial stage of the flight. In general, all this resembles a bluff, as with SOI.
    2. Scorpio 83
      0
      5 February 2013 17: 35
      Do not write in a glass! wink it is not always visible or audible with us, but later we learn about a good means of counteraction, there were many such cases and now they are! soldier
    3. 0
      6 February 2013 02: 20
      Hope for our tadpole engineers from the defense industry. Our developers are always thanks to becken-brains (in the best sense of the expression wink ) found the necessary solutions.
  2. 0
    5 February 2013 14: 13
    Hypersound is one of the tools to quickly punish a dirty trick, located at a decent distance from the place where he mischief.
    Moreover, punishment in peacetime with a half-dormant air defense of the dirty trick or in the absence of it and provided that the coordinates of the base of the dirty taker are well known and do not change.
    In a full-scale war, when each other is opposed in general by opponents of equal strength, it is hardly possible to wait for special hypersound. because you can’t fly at hypersound either at low altitude or with decent maneuver.
    And if so, then all these hypersonic features will be excellent targets even for very average air defense.
    This has already been a lot of discussion on this site.
    1. postman
      0
      5 February 2013 14: 34
      Quote: gregor6549
      . because in hypersound at no low altitude

      "below" 20000 m is neither assumed nor possible, due to the temperature limitation, and it is meaningless.
      Quote: gregor6549
      you can't fly with a decent maneuver

      What maneuver is needed at an altitude of 3550 km? What for?
      Quote: gregor6549
      targets even for very mediocre air defense.

      "Spednent air defense" will do nothing even if it overextends itself.
      Yes, and "not average", to do something, GREAT DOUBT.
      1. 0
        5 February 2013 16: 51
        Uv Postman,
        The main problems of any air defense and missile defense are:
        detect and identify the target this time, put it on SUSTAINABLE tracking is two, and three- provide guidance of weapons, using the data obtained as a result of the first two processes.
        For high-altitude and non-maneuvering targets, this is no longer a problem, even if the targets fly in hypersound.
        Elementary things should be known. Don’t be offended. Yes, and it is desirable to quote the opponent without grammatical errors ... if possible, of course
        1. postman
          0
          6 February 2013 03: 41
          Quote: gregor6549
          . Don’t be offended.

          Yes you. I never take offense at this.
          You, in order to increase your erudition, read at your leisure (if you have access): features of hitting targets like SR-71, everything is there and there’s probability
          Quote: gregor6549
          The main problems of any air defense and missile defense are:

          Not gas station of course (only up to 3700km / h)), but very good. suitable height ...
          Or S-75M firing at an A-II type target

          Quote: gregor6549
          Yes, and quote the opponent preferably without grammatical errors ... if possible

          Of course, yj is not conscious: Klava just sticks
    2. to water
      +1
      5 February 2013 16: 36
      With the current limitation of nuclear weapons stockpiles, as well as with further planned reductions, the picture is not in our favor. Suppose that some of our launched missiles will be taken over by the global American missile defense system. Part of the missile launching positions will be destroyed by hypersonic missiles. If something reaches their "island", then they will probably have a regional missile defense system deployed there, which will also significantly thin out the warheads. And what we have in the bottom is the damage inflicted on the enemy without guaranteed destruction, which has always stopped the use of nuclear weapons. Of course, there are missile carriers, but NATO members are trying not to let them out of sight, which implies a preemptive strike.
      1. +1
        7 February 2013 06: 28
        For the United States, no hypersonic missiles are needed, this is a bluff (IMHO). You open your eyes wider. They, together with the EU, have already overlaid us with their bases, and in the future, missile defense systems from all sides. Cornering. So hypersonic missiles are not needed here. All the same, the blocks will crumble onto the head of Europe (if the factor is favorable for the USA)
        Quote: regar
        ... If something reaches their "island"
        And in this case, we do not have to fly to the "island". You can put all the blocks in the "blue sea" and wash away our SaSHU to hell. And our salvation in this situation is the submarine fleet, and as much as possible. Otherwise, with the Russian Federation it will be like with Iraq, Libya and other countries that have been democratised by the EU and the United States. We will gnaw each other, AND AT THIS TIME WE WILL BE robbed.
  3. postman
    0
    5 February 2013 14: 27
    Quote: Author Adam Shore
    In the photo: HiFiRe device became a logical continuation of the Australian HyShot program.


    The photo is not "HiFiRe", launches just according to the HyShot program
    HyShot III launch March 25, 2006

    HyShot IV launch March 30, 2006

    HyShot VI - Free Flight Mach 8 Scramjet
    HyShot VII - Sustainable Mach 8 Scramjet Flight

    There were no starts (in work)

    HyCAUSE launch June 15, 2007


    and PU and other rocket

    HIFiRE: Terrier-Orion Mk70 (Talos) improved Malemute (step Mk.12)



    HIFiRE launch from Hawaii maq 2012
  4. +4
    6 February 2013 00: 19
    CREATION OF MISSILE COMPLEXES OF SUCH PLAN FOLLOWS A WHOLE LOT OF PROBLEMS.
    1. MATERIALS: AT A SPEED OF 3-M ALUMINUM FROM FRICTION, MELTS WITH AIR. SO MIG-25P WAS STEEL AND TITANIUM. BUT AND INDICATORS IMPRESSING AT A HEIGHT OF 36 KM. SHOWED SPEED 3600 KM \ HOUR.
    BUT WHEN IT LANDED, THE CASE HAS SO HEATED THAT IT BENT.
    2. COMET OUR DEVELOPED MAXIMUM 4-5M. MATERIALS AGAIN, ALSO COULD MORE. HOW MUCH I KNOW, IN SEPTEMBER OF THIS YEAR A NEW PROTOTYPE WILL FLY, IT'S GOOD.
    3. TO ACHIEVE SPEEDS OF 10-12M MOST OF ALL YOU WILL HAVE TO CREATE A SHELL FROM PLASMA AROUND THE CASE, THE OPERATIONS ARE ALSO AVAILABLE. THIS IS A CAVITATOR TYPE AT THE RT "SHKVAL".
    BUT !!! AGAIN DILEMA! IT WILL BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MANAGE! PLASMA FULLY BLOCKS ANY RADIO SIGNAL. BUT THERE IS ADVANTAGES, LOSS OF RADIO INSIDE IN ALL RANGE OF LENGTHS OF WAVES. Well, I THINK EVERYTHING WILL BE WELL, EVERYTHING IS OUR LEGISLATORS IN HYPERSONIC.
    1. postman
      0
      7 February 2013 15: 39
      Quote: Zubr
      THEREFORE, MIG-25P WAS STEEL AND TITANIUM. BUT AND INDICATORS IMPRESSING AT A HEIGHT OF 36 KM. SHOWED SPEED 3600 KM \ HOUR.

      July 22 1977 37800m E-266M (MiG-25M) - A.V. Fedotov since 2000kg
      October 5 1967 2981,5 (2930) km / h E-266 (MiG-25) M.M.Komarov from 2000kg

      / Of course not P and not PD /
      at an "altitude of 36 km" it is not possible to "show a speed of 3600 km / h"

      Distribution of structural materials:
      - steel structures - 80% of the mass of the airframe;
      - titanium alloys - 8%;
      - structural elements from heat-resistant aluminum alloy D19-11%.



      Quote: Zubr
      BUT WHEN IT LANDED, THE CASE HAS SO HEATED THAT IT BENT.

      ? at 270C?
      XB-70A in flights on heights of more than 21000 m with a speed of M = 3 the temperature of the inlet edges of the air intake and the leading edges of the wing was 580-605 K, and the rest of the skin was 470-500 K.


      Quote: Zubr
      COMET OUR DEVELOPED MAXIMUM 4-5M.

      KS-1 "Comet"?
      0,9M!
      Quote: Zubr
      ALMOST COULD MORE.

      PROTON-M, for example, along a "flat" trajectory .. Yes?

      Quote: Zubr
      A NEW PROTOTYPE WILL FLY IN SEPTEMBER OF THIS YEAR

      France LEA (Onera, Dassault and MBDA) launch with Tu-22?

      PROBABLY TOTAL 2014.
      Quote: Zubr
      TO ACHIEVE SPEEDS 10-12M ASAP, ALL WILL HAVE TO AROUND THE PLASMA AROUND THE HOUSING

      table of temperatures, heights, speeds in the attachment, analyze
      How does plasma help? / This plasma was given to everyone, someone farted and everyone repeats /
      Quote: Zubr
      IT WILL BE IMPOSSIBLE TO MANAGE! PLASMA FULLY BLOCK ANY RADIO SIGNAL

      someone "farted" and everyone repeats
  5. 0
    6 February 2013 00: 24
    And in the future, a hypersonic orbital truck or just an orbital vehicle with such missiles in orbit, horror, who will do this first?
    1. postman
      0
      7 February 2013 15: 12
      Quote: Bagel
      who will do it first?

      The Americans




      Although it could be different


      VIDEO Author of the idea: Valentina Rassomokha-Anokhina
      http://filmix.net/49060-mgnovennyy-globalnyy-udar-iz-kosmosa-2012.html
  6. DuraLexSedLex.
    +2
    6 February 2013 02: 10
    The article is reposted from popular mechanics (((((((((((If only a little bit of ate-a-word some word-by-word, I’m re-reading a magazine.
    1. postman
      0
      7 February 2013 15: 04
      Quote: DuraLexSedLex.
      (If only a little asebaty nesa word for word, as if I’m re-reading a magazine.

      You did not pay attention: AND THERE (HAMMER) AND HERE (FOOD)
      AUTHOR ONE AND THE SAME - Adam Shore
      lol
  7. 0
    31 January 2016 14: 19
    It is gratifying to hear that the work has not stopped. There is still much to be done, but success is beyond doubt. To a simple balloon, mankind has been going for thousands of years, and then hypersound.