Unguided missiles S-13 "Tulumbas" in operation and in combat

41
Unguided missiles S-13 "Tulumbas" in operation and in combat
The fighter uses S-13 missiles


Russian front and army aviation uses a variety of weapons in the current Special Operation, incl. unguided rockets. A prominent place in its arsenals is occupied by S-13 Tulumbas rockets. This missile was put into service ca. 40 years ago, and then on its basis they created a whole family of products with different capabilities and parameters. Despite its advanced age, the S-13 line remains effective and convenient weapons. Several main factors contribute to maintaining this state of affairs.



"Air-ground"


As far as we know, S-13 unguided aircraft missiles (UAR) have been used in the Special Operation to protect Donbass almost from its very beginning. With their help, Su-25 attack aircraft, as well as Ka-52 and Mi-28 attack helicopters, attack a variety of targets and objects. Enemy positions and concentrations, equipment and fortifications come under missile attack. In this case, missiles of different modifications are used with different warheads, optimized to hit certain targets.

The Ministry of Defense has repeatedly demonstrated footage of the combat use of unguided missiles, incl. "Tulumbasov". Depending on the task at hand and the situation at the site, launches of the unmanned aerial vehicle are carried out from a flat dive or from a nose-up. Launches are carried out from a distance of up to several kilometers, taking into account the requirements of a specific modification of the weapon.

Like any unguided weapon, the S-13 family of unguided missiles have limitations in terms of shooting accuracy. However, modern fire control devices for aircraft and helicopters make it possible to improve such indicators regardless of the flight mode. In addition, the ability to fire in one gulp is important. At the same time, a certain dispersion of projectiles is necessary for working against area targets and makes it possible to hit a specific object with a greater probability.


S-13T missiles with tandem warhead and extended warhead

In general, S-13 products remain a simple and inexpensive aircraft weapon capable of effectively hitting designated targets. They are used within the same weapon system with rockets of other calibers and occupy an intermediate position between the lighter S-8 NAR and the heavy S-24 and S-25.

Progressive development


At the turn of the sixties and seventies, the Ministry of Defense came to the conclusion that it was necessary to create a promising NAR capable of penetrating concrete shelters and hitting equipment and manpower inside them. After the necessary preliminary studies, in 1973 this idea was brought to the development stage. The creation of a project with the code “Tulumbas” (a type of percussion musical instrument) was entrusted to the Institute of Applied Physics (Novosibirsk).

Taking into account the technical task set and the specifics of the existing NAR nomenclature, the rocket caliber was chosen as 122 mm or 12,2 cm, from which the S-13 index was formed, rounded up. The first version of the missile received concrete-piercing combat equipment to destroy protected objects and materiel inside them. The development of such a missile and the “gun array” for it continued until the end of the decade. In 1979, the S-13 missile with the UB-13 launch unit was presented for state testing. Due to the specific combat mission, testing and modification of the missile lasted several years. It was only in 1983 that the S-13 product was put into service.

By this time, the development of new modifications of the NAR had begun. As a result of this process, the improved S-1984T penetrating missile was adopted in 13. In 1986, the Air Force began to receive the S-13OF NAR with a high-explosive fragmentation warhead, and in the early nineties they developed the S-13D with volumetric detonating equipment. Some of these products were subsequently modernized using new components and technologies.


Preparing the UB-13 unit for a combat mission as part of the Special Operation, 2022.

Design features


All missiles of the S-13 “Tulumbas” family have a similar design, but differ from each other in certain features. The differences are due to the need to solve different combat missions and/or differences in tactical and technical characteristics. Moreover, all modifications of the NAR can be used with a single block of guides and on all compatible carriers.

S-13 missiles are manufactured in an elongated cylindrical body of uniform or variable diameter. The warhead is placed in the head compartment of the hull, and the main volume is given over to the solid propellant engine. The tail has a section of reduced diameter, to which folding stabilizers are attached, giving the rocket rotation in flight.

The size and weight of the products changed as the family developed. Thus, the basic NAR S-13 received a bicaliber body with a diameter of 90 mm in the head section with a 122 mm engine compartment. The total length reached 2,54 m with a weight of 57 kg. The next S-13T also had a bicaliber body, but was longer and heavier - 3,1 m and 57 kg. High-explosive fragmentation and volume-detonating combat equipment is placed in the head compartment of 122 mm caliber. Missiles with such warheads were no larger or heavier than the S-13T.

The basic S-13 received a penetrating warhead weighing 21 kg with an explosive charge of 1,82 kg, capable of penetrating up to 3 m of soil and 1 m of concrete, and then exploding behind an obstacle. For the S-13T, a tandem penetrating warhead was developed, in which the existing charge was supplemented with a new one weighing 16,3 kg. Penetration capacity has improved to 6 m of soil and 1 m of concrete. High-explosive fragmentation missiles received warheads weighing up to 33-38 kg with an explosive charge of 7-15,5 kg. Volumetric detonating warheads for the S-13D/DF have a mass of 32-33 kg.


Launch of an S-13 missile by a Su-25 attack aircraft

Using the standard engine, the NAR S-13 accelerates to 650 m/s. The initial speed of heavier missiles of the family was reduced to 500-530 m/s. The launch range is up to 3 km for early modifications and up to 5-6 km for later modifications.

The secret of longevity


The NAR S-13 “Tulumbas” has been in service for 40 years and is constantly evolving. These missiles are actively used in training events and in real military operations, and the Aerospace Forces are not going to abandon them. It can be expected that different versions of the S-13, incl. completely new developments will continue to be in service in the next decades. This longevity of an unguided rocket is due to several main factors.

First of all, it is the simplicity of the design. An unguided rocket lacks complex equipment and is easy to manufacture. The low cost makes it possible to produce missiles in large quantities and create warehouse stocks of the required volume. Accordingly, combat aviation gets the opportunity to actively use missiles and solve problems without worrying about the consumption of ammunition and the economic component of airstrikes.

Despite the simplicity of the architecture, all versions of the S-13 are built on successful units and show high tactical and technical characteristics for their class. A sufficiently high firing range and the power of combat units are ensured. In addition, the simple architecture facilitates modernization, which can only be accomplished by replacing the main components - the engine and warhead.


Firing from a pitch-up position, view from the pilot's seat

For the S-13 family, combat units of three main classes with different functions and combat capabilities have been created. This significantly improves the flexibility of the combat operation of missile carriers and allows them to attack a variety of targets, from manpower to field fortifications and shelters.

The absence of special controls to a certain extent simplifies the integration of NAR into the weapons complex of a particular carrier. At the same time, to increase the accuracy of firing unguided missiles, appropriate fire control systems and/or software for them are needed. Thanks to this, all current aircraft and helicopters of front-line and army aviation can use the S-13 and other missiles, and we can expect that promising models of the next generations will retain this capability.

In terms of its tactical and technical characteristics, Tulumbas occupies an intermediate position between lighter and heavier domestically produced missiles. It becomes possible to choose ammunition that more fully corresponds to the task at hand and the existing conditions. Accordingly, the flexibility of using unguided missile weapons in general increases.

Operation continues


Thus, S-13 unguided missiles remain in service with our Aerospace Forces and retain their status as one of the most popular models. Despite its advanced age, this family of missiles is actively used in various combat missions and is used against a variety of enemy targets.

Right now you can observe the results of the combined use of modern aircraft with advanced control systems and unguided missiles. The demilitarization of the Kyiv regime is successfully moving forward, and Tulumbas of various modifications are making a certain contribution to this.
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    7 March 2024 07: 15
    Essentially RSZO for air. In the Middle East they put these on pickup trucks.
  2. +2
    7 March 2024 08: 19
    quite recently there was an article on a similar topic
  3. +2
    7 March 2024 08: 45
    Inaccuracy in the article: Ka-52 does not use S-13
    1. 0
      7 March 2024 22: 33
      Only Mi-28N/NM. Ukrainians are used with Mi-8/17 and Mi-24. But they apparently don’t have helicopter B-13Vs and use airplane B-13Ls for helicopters
      1. +2
        9 March 2024 05: 17
        Unfortunately, the NARs, despite all the colorfulness of their launches, are already a thing of the past and the only thing they are needed for is for show. Pitch-up launches have zero effect with huge costs for fuel and wear and tear of expensive equipment and unnecessary risks for crews and helicopters with aircraft. Aviation needs guided ammunition with a decent range so that each shot hits the target while planes and helicopters are at safe distances.
        1. 0
          11 March 2024 09: 44
          Pitch-up launches have zero effect at huge costs
          A simple example, our bird detects a group of Nazis entering a forest belt.
          They call a Su-25SM, which quickly arrives at the desired location and covers the specified area with NURS from a pitching position. The birdie records the hit. Su-25SM leave the area.

          All the advantages are air control of a large area. High reaction speed. Sufficient power to strike an amassed enemy. Yes
          1. 0
            11 March 2024 10: 09
            A simple example, our bird detects a group of Nazis entering a forest belt.
            They call a Su-25SM, which quickly arrives at the desired location and covers the specified area with NURS from a pitching position.

            Firstly, if the Ministry of Defense carried out a reform and at least a platoon of UAVs appeared in the regular battalions, at least those located at the forefront, then such a problem would be quickly and effectively solved by the FPV with drones and on its own, and at tens of times less cost than flying an aircraft with NURs.
            Secondly, aim the Grad standing on the ground at the target, taking into account the strength and speed of the wind in different parts of the missile’s flight path, in order to put the package into the problem with at least a spread of a hundred meters.
            And you propose to aim the NURs at the target from an airplane rushing about 300 km per hour, without taking into account the wind speed, by eye, controlling the elevation angle of the missile flight by the pitching angle, deflecting the elevator control stick, and still hope that these NURs can sleep somewhere! This is huge!
            NURs are an analogue of aerial bombs and they are designed to hit visually observable targets and not from a nose-up, but from a dive. The use of NURs with pitching up is an expensive and stupid attraction. And the use of NURs as they were supposed to be used became obsolete with the advent of MANPADS and became dangerous in Afghanistan 35 years ago.
            1. 0
              11 March 2024 12: 40
              Quote: ramzay21
              such a problem would be quickly and efficiently solved by the PDF

              No. In forest belts, FPVs are not as effective. And now, soon there will be more greenery, plus the efficiency of heat exchangers will decrease and it will be even worse.

              here the hail standing on the ground should be aimed at the target


              If the City is at hand, then of course!
              But the advantage of air is that you can control a huge area with a small number of sides.

              you propose to aim the NURs at the target from an airplane speeding about 300 km per hour, without taking into account wind speed, by eye


              No. I wrote about the Su-25SM, which are equipped with SVP-24-25 (Hephaestus), which monitors all of the above parameters using its sensors and provides quite high-quality target designation automatically. The NURs will lie in a very even ellipse along the forest belt.

              All the advantages here are on the side of the Katyusha air vehicles. Yes
              1. 0
                12 March 2024 06: 55
                No. In forest belts, FPVs are not as effective. And now, soon there will be more greenery, plus the efficiency of heat exchangers will decrease and it will be even worse.

                A normal platoon of UAV operators will 24/7 terrorize those who are holed up in this forest belt for much less money than ONE flight of a pair of Su-25SM with their duty in the air. And the main thing is that the efficiency and result of the work of a UAV platoon will be much higher than the Su-25SM raid
                No. I wrote about the Su-25SM, which are equipped with SVP-24-25 (Hephaestus), which monitors all of the above parameters using its sensors and provides quite high-quality target designation automatically.

                Hephaestus is designed to work from a dive and there are no ballistic computers for working from a nose-up. Launching NURs from a pitch-up is an expensive and stupid attraction, even with Hephaestus or without Hephaestus.
                1. 0
                  12 March 2024 09: 51
                  Quote: ramzay21
                  A normal platoon of UAV operators will be available 24/7

                  Even if you skip what was described above, that branches and leaves will interfere with observation, as well as the flight of the FPV; The problem with a UAV platoon is similar to the problem of having a free city. The operating range of FPV drones, God willing, is 20 kilometers, in the presence of a good repeater and the absence of enemy opposition.

                  But what should we do if the target is discovered exactly where we do not have such splendor? Moreover, there is a high chance that the enemy will specifically try to move in such places. And here the flyers will come to the rescue. Yes

                  there are no ballistic computers for working with pitching.

                  Here is a description of the subject:

                  The geographic coordinates of the target are superimposed on the DEM, which gives the height of this point, and thus the geodetic coordinates of the target are formed. They are inserted into the sighting system. Using the current altitude, flight speed, course and coordinates of the helicopter, the computer calculates the approach to the combat course, the start of the pitching maneuver and its parameters, including the pitching angle.


                  Read it, it describes in detail the use of pitching for airplanes and helicopters.

                  https://naked-science.ru/article/tech/kabrirovanie


                  In many combat situations (such as the one above), a pitch-up strike is a very effective tactical technique. Sometimes even the only possible one. Yes
                  1. 0
                    12 March 2024 13: 51
                    But what should we do if the target is discovered exactly where we do not have such splendor?

                    And for this there is a Su-34 with a shock-absorbing system and there should also be light information security systems, at least a Su-35 with the same shock-absorbing system.
                    In addition, there must be massive attack UAVs starting from the Pacer with control via a satellite channel, and for this we need massive satellites capable of transmitting and receiving data at high speed.
                    Then you won’t have to invent anything and launch stupid and expensive rides with rocket launchers hitting you from a pitch-up position.
          2. +1
            11 March 2024 12: 54
            Quote: Netl
            They call a Su-25SM, which quickly arrives at the right place

            Where will he come from? They are not on duty in the air, and it is not an option given the duration of the flight.

            Quote: Netl
            and covers the specified area with NURS from a pitching position. The birdie records the hit. Su-25SM leave the area.

            How do they determine the landmark?

            Quote: Netl
            All the advantages are air control of a large area. High reaction speed. Sufficient power to strike an amassed enemy.

            Missed on all counts. The most common S-8KOM missile has an explosive mass of 1 kg, fragments of about 1,5 kg, this is the level of an 82 mm mine. The S-13 is more powerful, but the probability of a hit is even lower due to the smaller number of missiles in the salvo.
            1. 0
              11 March 2024 13: 27
              They are not on duty in the air, and it’s not an option with its duration

              They can also be on duty for an hour and a half or two in a dangerous place at a dangerous time. How the authorities organize combat work. But in any case, the plane will arrive faster than Hail will arrive through the mud in most cases.

              How do they determine the landmark?

              During normal operation, GLONASS coordinates will be transmitted from the observer bird. Well, if the enemy is very good at jamming, then how will it work out, and they can send a picture of the area and convey in words, like, at the intersection of 2 roads. Yes

              S-13 is more powerful, but probability

              IMHO, the most suitable option for hitting the enemy in a forest belt is the S-8S.
              2 sq.m. - area affected by arrow-shaped elements from 500 missile. Heavy armor can help, but with a high degree of probability the enemy group after such a strike will no longer be very combat-ready. Yes
              1. +1
                11 March 2024 17: 05
                Quote: Netl
                They can also be on duty for an hour and a half or two in a dangerous place at a dangerous time.

                It has a total flight duration of only 1,5 hours, and a tactical range along the combined profile of 350 km. Where should he be on duty?

                Quote: Netl
                How the authorities organize combat work.

                The fact of the matter is that it doesn’t organize.

                Quote: Netl
                But in any case, the plane will arrive faster than Hail will arrive through the mud in most cases.

                Such interspecies interaction is only a dream in the realities of the Russian army.

                Quote: Netl
                During normal operation, GLONASS coordinates will be transmitted from the observer bird.

                The Su-25's navigation system is rather weak; there are doubts about the possibility of promptly entering coordinates.

                Quote: Netl
                Well, if the enemy is very good at jamming, then how will it work out, and they can send a picture of the area and convey in words, like, at the intersection of 2 roads. Yes

                From the cockpit of an airplane flying 50 meters from the ground at a speed of 700 km/h, the terrain looks a little different. What to do in difficult weather conditions, at night?

                Quote: Netl
                IMHO, the most suitable option for hitting the enemy in a forest belt is the S-8S.
                2 sq.m. - area affected by arrow-shaped elements from 500 missile. Heavy armor can help, but with a high degree of probability the enemy group after such a strike will no longer be very combat-ready. Yes

                SPELs are good at hitting targets outside of shelters, in entrenched parts or simply in more or less dense vegetation; the effectiveness will be lower. The low speed of the missile at the moment of meeting the target will also reduce its effectiveness due to its movement along an off-design trajectory, since the SPEL ejection speed is about 150 km/h.
                1. 0
                  11 March 2024 17: 34
                  Quote: Lozovik
                  It has a total flight duration of only 1,5

                  Well, so, refueling is also provided. It all comes down to organization and necessity.

                  Such interspecies interaction in the realities of the Russian army

                  This is understandable. sad
                  But when assessing tactics, it is worth proceeding from the fact that the parties are fighting correctly.

                  what to do in difficult weather conditions at night

                  We hope that the SM3 has solved the problem of operational input and coordinate guidance at a sufficient level. Otherwise, in such conditions, the completion of the task will depend entirely on the genius of the pilot.

                  in entrenched parts or simply in more or less dense vegetation, the effectiveness will be lower


                  We looked at an example of a group that had not dug in and came in to land. A completely routine case for the current situation in the Northern Military District. Typically, plantings between fields do not have much dense wood to effectively stop SPEL. Moreover, the blow is from above and there may be thin branches in the way.

                  So the effectiveness of NUR, if used correctly, will be quite decent. Yes
                  1. 0
                    12 March 2024 10: 12
                    Quote: Netl
                    Well, so, refueling is also provided.

                    On the Su-25? No.

                    Quote: Netl
                    We hope that the SM3 has solved the problem of operational input and coordinate guidance at a sufficient level.

                    Most likely, flight missions are programmed only on the ground.

                    Quote: Netl
                    We looked at an example of a group that had not dug in and came in to land. A completely routine case for the current situation in the Northern Military District

                    On the contrary, the case is quite special.

                    Quote: Netl
                    Typically, plantings between fields do not have much dense wood to effectively stop SPEL.

                    The description clearly states: to defeat openly located manpower, in places of concentration and on the march.

                    Quote: Netl
                    Moreover, the blow is from above and there may be thin branches in the way.

                    In general, a missile fuse of this type is not designed for a long flight time; the damaging elements will be thrown high in the air.

                    Quote: Netl
                    So the effectiveness of NUR, if used correctly, will be quite decent.

                    The time for unguided weapons is long gone, as the current conflict demonstrates this perfectly.
  4. +3
    7 March 2024 08: 53
    We urgently need to make an adjustable missile based on the S-13. The 122-mm caliber allows missiles to be equipped with both a satellite guidance system and a passive laser homing head. This will make it possible to make full use of the great power of the S-13 missiles, and the LGSN will make it possible to destroy, among other things, mobile targets. The increase in the effectiveness of adjustable missiles in comparison with launches from a pitched position can be assessed using the example of the effectiveness of bombs with UMPC and SVP-24 Hephaestus.
    Adjustable guided missiles with LGSN can be used from Su-30/34/35 and MiG-29/35 aircraft, providing KOLS target illumination
    1. 0
      7 March 2024 08: 56
      And in the USSR in the 80s there seemed to be an S-25L.
      1. +2
        7 March 2024 09: 00
        In the USSR there were S-25L, S-25LD, but it was possible to hang only 1 missile on 1 pylon. The use of standard 5 UB-13 charging containers allows Su-30/34/35 aircraft to carry up to 20 S-13 missiles. If they are highly accurate, then this will be lethal force!
        1. -1
          7 March 2024 10: 20
          That is, in principle, the technology was there.
        2. +1
          7 March 2024 10: 27
          Quote: Cympak
          The use of standard 5 UB-13 charging containers allows Su-30/34/35 aircraft to carry up to 20 S-13 missiles.

          The unit is called B-13L, it has a mode of operation with missiles with a laser seeker. Technically, aviation has been ready to operate 122 mm guided missiles since the 80s.
    2. +5
      7 March 2024 12: 38
      So for a long time they made the S-13 with a laser seeker, as many as two pieces. First, in the nineties, the S-13kor, and then in the analogue time, “Monolit” was developed by Tekhmash, tests were carried out in 2018-19. And there was an INS block called OU-122. But as usual it ended in nothing - either the missile was wrong, or the Ministry of Defense decided not to waste money, we loved to fight with cast iron and nurses
    3. 0
      9 March 2024 21: 20
      We urgently need to make an adjustable missile based on the S-13. The 122 mm caliber allows

      The Americans already did this the day before yesterday for the Hydra-70 NAR.
      Can you guess what caliber the Hydra is?
  5. +1
    7 March 2024 09: 28
    Thus, S-13 unguided missiles remain in service with our Aerospace Forces and retain their status as one of the most popular models.
    So, moreover... an aviation 122-mm Monolit missile is in development! Yes...it is being developed as a managed one, but there was a message that the developers began to consider an unmanaged version of "Monolith"! In addition, at one time, the S-13L was created with a laser guidance system... this is when a seeker in the form of a head (nose?) “attachment” was attached to the unguided S-13!
    1. +1
      7 March 2024 12: 40
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      An aviation 122-mm Monolit missile is in development!

      It was in development in 2018, but now it is rather a thing of history
      1. +1
        7 March 2024 14: 18
        I looked for information about “Monolith” for the spring of 2021, it was still an initiative development of “Tekhmash”:
        The research and production concern Tekhmash (part of Rostec) has begun testing prototypes of the latest high-precision aviation missile Monolit of 122 mm caliber, the company’s executive director Alexander Kochkin told RIA Novosti.
        As the agency’s interlocutor noted, if the test results are positive, the company will discuss with the state the conduct and financing of development work

        If the development at that time had not even passed the R&D stage, then the wait will be a long time. But there is a chance that the SVO will demonstrate to the Ministry of Defense the need for such ASPs (it is known that before the SVO, the previously developed UMPC was not particularly interested in the Ministry of Defense). On the other hand, army aviation widely uses nose-up launches of NARs and reports on their high efficiency, but for some reason without citing personnel objective control, and where there is video recording, the real spread of missiles is visible.
        1. +1
          7 March 2024 15: 31
          Quote: Cympak
          But there is a chance that the Northern Military District will demonstrate to the Ministry of Defense the need for such TSA

          Well, this monolith is essentially the same Krasnopol, only screwed to a rocket. Krasnopoli somehow doesn’t work here often. Perhaps this is too complex a system - a drone for target illumination and a howitzer/helicopter. We don’t like something so complex; for some reason it is born in wild torment.
          Quote: Cympak
          proactive development

          We have analogue networks everywhere, where the military-industrial complex chases after the Defense Ministry, advertises itself, and the generals don’t need this for nothing. At the parade, you can’t tell a tulumbas from a monolith
        2. +1
          7 March 2024 20: 07
          I looked at the technical specifications in the wiki - range up to 6 km. Planes and helicopters do not fly deep into enemy territory and in the future they are prohibited from going there. Approached the LBS - fired and ran away. Hit an armor-piercing bullet into a concrete dugout? Unlikely. Weapons - SO-SO. Since it is aviation, it is expensive. I think it’s cheaper to launch such missiles from MLRS.
  6. +3
    7 March 2024 19: 25
    5-6 km range. This is a huge risk for the wearer. Even a modern MANPADS can reach it. That’s why they shoot both S-8 and S-13 from a pitched position. And this practically costs a pretty penny. Or like the firing of our artillery in the first year of the Northern Military District in areas and directions. On videos taken from above from a UAV, everyone saw the results of such shooting. All the fields and plains were full of craters. But it wasn't much use. Okay, now the artillerymen have abandoned such mediocre tactics. It’s time for our attack aircraft to shoot with something more accurate and long-range. The same FAB -25,100 with UMPC. And there will be more benefits and the carriers with their crews will be safer. If we use S-13 and S-8, then only those controlled with a seeker.
  7. 0
    7 March 2024 22: 37
    I have a question. I hope it’s not a secret because the Ukrainians also have the S-8D. How do the volume-detonating S-8D and S-13D work? For bombs, the ODAB releases gas and then the gas cloud is ignited by the fuser. And how does the whole process happen among the people?
    1. +1
      7 March 2024 22: 55
      NAR has a process similar to that of a bumblebee and other small calibers - a specially selected mixture of hexogen and aluminum powder explodes. Aluminum lacks an oxidizing agent, and it ignites after expansion, creating a volumetric explosion. TOS is similar. Two-stroke fuel bombs are just huge fools from an airplane
      1. 0
        7 March 2024 22: 58
        Clear! This is more likely a thermobaric warhead. Like the AGM-114N of the Amers and the Russian 9M120-F ATGM
        1. 0
          7 March 2024 23: 24
          In general, few people know how a thermobar differs from an OD. Explodes and okay
          1. +1
            9 March 2024 21: 38
            thermobar from OD

            Same thing in different words.
            Detonating an explosive distributed in space to create not a shock wave, but a zone of elevated temperature and pressure, is essentially a way to increase the affected area by reasonably reducing the force of impact, while maintaining approximately the same mass of the projectile.
            And how to distribute and undermine this explosive, what it will be like and how to deliver it to the target is a matter of technology.
            1. 0
              9 March 2024 22: 08
              Well, in principle, all explosions are approximately the same, whether from a grenade, from a gas cylinder in a fire, or from a supernova. It's hard to make a small fuel bomb
              1. +1
                9 March 2024 22: 17
                like a grenade, like a gas cylinder in a fire, like a supernova

                Absolutely not.
                A grenade explodes from the detonation of an explosive, a gas cylinder explodes essentially twice, the first from the expansion of gas due to heating, and the second is the actual explosion of the gas due to its high temperature in the presence of an oxidizer, actually volumetric detonation.
                I don’t know how stars explode, I haven’t seen them.
  8. +1
    7 March 2024 22: 39
    It’s a pity there is no “minus” for the article. Today no one needs these NURSs fired into the air at whomever God sends... Enough about this already. Do something useful on the modern battlefield!
  9. 0
    9 March 2024 00: 38
    They made you cheap rockets for salvo firing - we don’t want it, we want one for the price of hundreds, so that it will hit a mosquito in the ass.
    If you have one tank and one high-precision missile, then great. If you have an enemy detachment, and even somewhere in a forest belt, then it is completely unclear what you will do with one missile, even the most high-precision one. They're just different weapons.
    Well, let's replace all the machine guns with sniper rifles, with high precision.
    1. 0
      9 March 2024 05: 59
      Quote: Naked Man
      If you have an enemy detachment, and even somewhere in a forest belt, then it is completely unclear what you will do with one missile, even the most highly accurate one.

      Likewise, you won’t be able to do much with NARs; the aiming point for all missiles in a salvo is still the same, and the affected area will be small. Against such targets, you need to use RBC, KMGU, ZAB or ZB.
  10. 0
    9 March 2024 21: 16
    Ryabov no longer knows what to write about.
    There was no article about the Kalashnikov assault rifle.
    You can write about the VKBO uniform, about boots. “Raincoats and raincoats play a very important role in the NWO.
    You could also write a whole article about morning exercise and meals.
  11. 0
    11 March 2024 10: 56
    Quote: ramzay21
    then such a problem would be quickly and effectively solved by FPV drones and

    No. In forest belts, FPVs are not as effective. And now things will turn green, the efficiency of heat exchangers will decrease and things will get even worse.

    here the hail standing on the ground should be aimed at the target

    If the City is at hand, then of course!
    But the advantage of air is that you can control a huge area with a small number of sides.

    you propose to aim the NURs at the target from an airplane speeding about 300 km per hour, without taking into account wind speed, by eye

    No. I wrote about the Su-25SM, which are equipped with SVP-24-25 (Hephaestus), which monitors all of the above parameters using its sensors and provides quite high-quality target designation. The NURs will lie in a very even ellipse along the forest belt.

    All the advantages here are on the side of the air "Katyushas"Yes