BKO "Vitebsk" in the Special Operation

39
BKO "Vitebsk" in the Special Operation
Attack Ka-52 with the Vitebsk missile defense system. Radiation direction finders are visible in the bow; Spherical optical suppression stations are located under the bottom. Photo "Russian Helicopters"


Front-line and army planes and helicopters aviation, participating in the current Special Operation to protect Donbass, are exposed to known threats. To reduce risks and protect against enemy anti-aircraft weapons, aircraft are equipped with the modern Vitebsk airborne defense system. Its devices detect the launch of enemy missiles in time and suppress their homing heads, disrupting the attack. The capabilities and potential of BCO "Vitebsk" are regularly demonstrated in practice. The complex helps solve combat missions and reduce possible losses.



Complexes in service


The promising BKO "Vitebsk" and several versions of its design for different media were developed in the first half of the 2015s at the Samara Research Institute "Ekran", part of the Concern "Radio-Electronic Technologies" (KRET). In XNUMX, the company mastered the serial production of new devices and began supplying them to aircraft manufacturing plants for installation on serial and field equipment.

By the beginning of the Special Operation to demilitarize the Kyiv regime in 2022, a significant part of the aircraft and helicopters of front-line and army aviation were equipped with new air defense systems. Subsequently, the production of Vitebsk and the corresponding modernization of aviation equipment continued, taking into account the needs of the troops.

Helicopters and airplanes of various types, equipped with Vitebsk, have been participating in the Special Operation from its very beginning. Su-25SM3 attack aircraft, Ka-52 helicopters, etc. They work both over the front line and near the enemy’s rear, where there is a threat in the form of his military air defense. The presence of an onboard defense complex with various means allows them to enter dangerous zones and effectively solve combat missions with minimal risk.


Mi-8AMTSh with "Vitebsk". Photo Vitalykuzmin.net

The operation of the Vitebsk air defense system in a real battle was first shown almost two years ago, in mid-March 2022. Then the Ministry of Defense published a video dedicated to the famous landing of troops at the Gostomel airfield. Other materials about this operation appeared in unofficial sources and also showed the work of army aviation and the use of defense systems.

Mi-8 transport helicopters of modern modifications and Ka-52 attack helicopters were involved in the landing operation. The official video showed how the Vitebsk detects threats in the form of enemy missiles and warns the crews about them. In response to missile launches, the pilots performed an anti-aircraft maneuver, and the BKO automatic equipment used standard suppression means. As reported, during the flight in such conditions, each helicopter with Vitebsk managed to evade 3-5 or more missiles.

Experience


The combat work of army and front-line aviation continues. The use of standard airborne defense systems in different designs also continues. From time to time, new reports appear in various sources about the successful use of “Vitebsk” and the rescue of another combat unit from missiles. Wherein news This kind of thing has long become commonplace and no longer attracts the attention it once did. This circumstance directly indicates the success of the modern BCO and its effectiveness.

During combat use, valuable experience is gained that is used to improve the complex. Thus, back in August 2022, KRET reported that the results of the first months of operation in real combat conditions were being analyzed and helping the development of Vitebsk. At the same time, it was noted that there was feedback from direct users who provide the necessary information.


Footage from the optical-electronic system of the Ka-52 helicopter with Vitebsk, which participated in the capture of Gostomel. Still from a video from the Russian Ministry of Defense

The other day, the Zvezda TV channel showed a new episode of the Military Acceptance program, dedicated to the work of KRET. One of the topics of the program was BKO "Vitebsk", its application and ways of further development. The concern's management noted that during the Special Operation the complex operates in the same way as during field testing and fully copes with its tasks. Deliveries of serial Vitebsk missiles to the troops continue, which is yielding the desired results.

Talking about the development of defense equipment, Military Acceptance and the Ekran Research Institute showed a device from the new modification of Vitebsk, undergoing bench tests. This is the so-called a mirror scanner designed to survey the surrounding space and detect launching and/or flying missiles. The ability to detect and track several air targets simultaneously is declared, but other details have not yet been reported.

The positive consequences of the current modernization of Vitebsk are obvious. The complex is being finalized taking into account the experience of working in a combat zone against real threats. The BKO encountered real foreign missiles of different models, which made it possible to clarify various nuances of its operation and introduce appropriate changes. Based on the results of such events, Vitebsk should show an increase in efficiency when working against missiles available to Ukrainian formations and to potential adversaries in the form of NATO countries.

A complex approach


BKO "Vitebsk" is designed as a set of tools intended for installation on different air platforms. Control equipment is mounted inside the aircraft or helicopter, and detectors and countermeasures are installed on external units. There are several variants of devices and a number of configurations - they are intended for different media and meet their requirements and features.


Elements of the BKO "Vitebsk" for the Su-25SM3 aircraft. Still from t/p "Military Acceptance"

Laser radiation sensors and ultraviolet direction finders-scanners installed around the perimeter of the aircraft are responsible for detecting threats. They detect attempts to measure the range and/or track them, and also detect the flame from a missile launch and determine the direction towards it. Data about detected objects is transmitted to the control unit.

Control devices automatically process incoming data, warn the crew about the threat and the direction towards it, and also take measures to protect the aircraft. The automatic mode of operation allows you to quickly respond to threats and select the optimal countermeasures, and also reduces the workload on pilots.

As countermeasures, units for shooting false thermal targets and dipole reflectors, an active jamming station, as well as optical-electronic suppression devices based on lasers are used. Thus, a radar-guided air defense system is exposed to passive or active interference that disrupts tracking and guidance. Infrared seekers are deflected using LTC or directionally suppressed by a laser.

The Vitebsk missile defense system in various configurations is used on a number of modern platforms in service with our aerospace forces. It is carried by Su-25 attack aircraft of the latest modifications, Mi-28 and Ka-52 attack helicopters, as well as Mi-35 and Mi-8AMTSh transport and combat helicopters. In addition, defense systems are available on the aircraft of the special flight detachment "Russia", which is responsible for transporting the country's top leadership.


Direction finder-scanner from the modernized Vitebsk. Still from t/p "Military Acceptance"

An export version of the Vitebsk, called President-S, has been developed and is offered to customers. There is information about several contracts for the supply of such equipment.

Minimal Risk


Practice has shown that the Vitebsk air defense system is one of the most useful recent developments for domestic combat aviation. With the help of this complex, it was possible to reduce to a minimum the risks of being damaged by current foreign air defense systems of the main classes and types. In particular, the unique effectiveness of work against MANPADS missiles was demonstrated.

BKO "Vitebsk" have become widespread in our front-line and army aviation, improving its protection against typical threats. Over the past two years, devices from serial complexes have been helping to preserve equipment and personnel, and also contribute to solving the general tasks of the Special Operations. It should be expected that this practice will continue and Russian aviation will continue to demonstrate high efficiency.
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    6 March 2024 04: 13
    Explain, two A50s had “Vitebsk”? and on IL 76?
    1. +3
      6 March 2024 04: 37
      Explain, two A50s had “Vitebsk”? and on IL 76?

      I think no. Vitebsk operates in the optical and infrared ranges to suppress MANPADS and other short-range missiles. At longer ranges, other seekers are used.
      1. +4
        6 March 2024 04: 44
        Quote from Andy_nsk
        Explain, two A50s had “Vitebsk”? and on IL 76?

        I think no. Vitebsk operates in the optical and infrared ranges to suppress MANPADS and other short-range missiles. At longer ranges, other seekers are used.

        I’m sure that Air Force One is covered in this.
        1. +2
          6 March 2024 05: 12
          Quote: Aerodrome
          I’m sure that Air Force One is covered in this
          He is also accompanied by fighter jets in some areas.
        2. +1
          6 March 2024 06: 34
          I’m sure that Air Force One is covered in this.

          Well, don’t compare the value of the guarantor and some A-50 crew members!
          1. 0
            6 March 2024 06: 56
            Su-25SM3 attack aircraft, Ka-52 helicopters, etc. They work both over the front line and near the enemy’s rear, where there is a threat in the form of his military air defense.

            The role of attack aircraft is played by various UAVs and bombs with UMPC.
            And in the available videos, in most cases, attack aircraft and helicopters operate from a cab.
            1. +2
              6 March 2024 07: 27
              The role of attack aircraft is played by various UAVs and bombs with UMPC.

              Aren't Su-25s already in use? UAVs SHOULD replace attack aircraft, but so far the Ministry of Defense has not bothered to create a UAV operator, create UAV companies and add UAV operator positions to the staffing lists of combat units
              And in the available videos, in most cases, attack aircraft and helicopters operate from a cab.

              Instead of this expensive but stupid carousel called shooting from a pitched position and hitting targets according to the principle of whom God will send, it would be better to use this money to purchase modern communications under the leadership of volunteers who really understand this, unlike the communications degenerals from the Moscow Region. The resources of airplanes and helicopters, the crews, and even better communication and controllability of the troops would be saved.
            2. +5
              6 March 2024 08: 05
              Quote: Civil
              The role of attack aircraft is played by various UAVs and bombs with UMPC.

              Bombs with UMPC cannot hit moving targets, but attack aircraft are designed for exactly this.

              Quote: Civil
              And in the available videos, in most cases, attack aircraft and helicopters operate from a cab.

              Only due to the lack of normal weapons, guidance and communications.
          2. 0
            6 March 2024 07: 38
            Quote: ramzay21
            Well, don’t compare the value of the guarantor and some A-50 crew members!

            It depends on who evaluates.
            But it seems our guarantor values ​​his life very much!
            1. -2
              6 March 2024 07: 46
              But it seems our guarantor values ​​his life very much!

              One airfield table is worth it!
    2. +3
      6 March 2024 04: 51
      there is a suspicion that these aircraft were not equipped... as far as I understand, not all front-line aviation is equipped yet, and even more so aircraft that do not approach the front line...
    3. +14
      6 March 2024 06: 44
      Quote: Aerodrome
      Explain, two A50s had “Vitebsk”? and on IL 76?

      No, the A-50 has the Kryazh-M onboard defense system. Today it is quite ancient, the same (but with a different name) is found on the Tu-142MZ, Tu-95MS, Tu-160, and the latest series of Tu-22M3.
      1. +7
        6 March 2024 09: 37
        You can immediately see that he is a specialist, and not an evaluator of the life of the crew and the President.
      2. 0
        9 March 2024 08: 34
        Sorry, how do you comment on this December 25, 2015, Article title.
        KRET handed over electronic warfare systems to the Ministry of Defense for the protection of transport aviation MOSCOW, November 30 - RIA Novosti
        Concern "Radio-electronic Technologies" (KRET, part of Rostec) has developed a new type of aviation decoys for the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation - disposable jamming transmitters (POI). An electronic warfare station is fully assembled in an ordinary standard aviation cartridge - it has an antenna, a chemical power generator, ensuring the operation of the transmitter for several seconds or tens of seconds,” the press service said. begins to emit interference signals targeted in the frequency spectrum and structure
        Concern "Radio-Electronic Technologies" (KRET, part of Rostec) has developed a new type of aviation decoys for the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation - IN THE 1st TRAP AND A HEAT TRAP AND A RADAR INTERFERENCE GENERATOR
        Issue dated 03.03.2024/XNUMX/XNUMX Military acceptance TV channel STAR
        KRET. Part 1 THE HEAD OF KRET ALEXANDER PAN STATED THAT ALL PLANES IN THE ZONE ARE EQUIPPED WITH EW. What is the electronic warfare against the Patriot air defense system, they don’t work, because they shot down an Il-76 with prisoners over Belgorod?
        1. +1
          10 March 2024 06: 56
          Quote: ain1959
          KRET handed over electronic warfare systems to the Ministry of Defense for the protection of transport aviation MOSCOW, November 30 - RIA Novosti

          He didn’t convey it, but developed it. In our reality these are slightly different things.

          Quote: ain1959
          THE HEAD OF KRET ALEXANDER PAN STATED THAT ALL PLANES IN THE ZONE ARE EQUIPPED WITH EW.

          Combat is possible, but not a fact. Transport and various special vehicles are mostly equipped only with radiation warning stations and PPR (that is, dipole reflectors).

          Quote: ain1959
          What is the electronic warfare against the Patriot air defense system, they don’t work, because they shot down an Il-76 with prisoners over Belgorod?

          There are no jamming stations on the IL-76, and there are no squibs with active jamming either (their price is oh-so-holy). So the question remains open.
    4. 0
      9 March 2024 08: 18
      Issue dated 03.03.2024/XNUMX/XNUMX Military acceptance TV channel STAR
      KRET. Part 1 THE HEAD OF KRET ALEXANDER PAN STATED THAT ALL AIRCRAFT IN THE ZONE ARE EQUIPPED WITH EW, disposable jammer transmitters (POI) An EW station is fully assembled in an ordinary standard aircraft cartridge - it has an antenna, a chemical power generator that provides operation for several seconds or tens of seconds transmitter," the press service said. It begins to emit interference signals targeted in the frequency spectrum and structure, as I understand it, the traps are of a new type - IN THE 1ST TRAP BOTH A HEAT TRAP AND A RADAR INTERFERENCE GENERATOR
  2. +1
    6 March 2024 04: 48
    I wonder if there are statistics on the destruction of aircraft equipped with this “Vitebsk” and if so, for what reasons...
    1. +4
      6 March 2024 05: 13
      Quote: Krilion
      I wonder if there are statistics on the destruction of aircraft equipped with this "Vitebsk"
      Surely there is, but it’s behind seven seals wink
      1. -3
        6 March 2024 10: 26
        "Vitebsk" practically does not work. Our aviation does not fly “by the ribbon”; it operates from a pitch-up position at long ranges. Instead of the terms “suppress” or “destroy”, a new term “fire” has matured. Air support for troops tends to zero. It is because of such “Vitebsk” and “Khibiny” that manned aircraft in this war became more decorative. KRET has been crying for 37.
        1. +1
          6 March 2024 11: 05
          Quote: Sulimov Vladimir
          It is because of such “Vitebsk” and “Khibiny” that manned aircraft in this war became more decorative
          Rather, due to more developed air defense, which today is superior to aircraft. Maybe except for drones
          1. -1
            6 March 2024 11: 33
            Not aircraft, but on-board defense systems on Russian aircraft, which are stuck in their scientific and technological level in the last century.
            1. +4
              6 March 2024 11: 35
              Quote: Sulimov Vladimir
              Not aircraft, but on-board defense systems on Russian aircraft, which are stuck in their scientific and technological level in the last century
              If there had been American or French planes in the skies over Donbass, the picture would have been exactly the same. So far the air defense is stronger
        2. +5
          6 March 2024 18: 03
          Quote: Sulimov Vladimir
          "Vitebsk" practically does not work.

          Quite the opposite, there are a lot of videos showing helicopters escaping from MANPADS fire thanks to the work of Vitebsk.

          Quote: Sulimov Vladimir
          Our aviation does not fly “by the ribbon”; it operates from a pitch-up position at long ranges.

          The ranges there are also short; this method of using NAR allows you to avoid jumping to medium heights when carrying out an attack. But the effectiveness of this drops to the level of mortar fire.

          Quote: Sulimov Vladimir
          It is because of such “Vitebsk” and “Khibiny” that manned aircraft in this war became more decorative.

          They have nothing to aim at and shoot with - you can’t fight much with NARs and assault bombs.
  3. +1
    6 March 2024 04: 50
    Will BKO "Vitebsk" help in the situation that occurred on May 13, 2023 in the Bryansk region?
    1. +5
      6 March 2024 08: 09
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      Will BKO "Vitebsk" help in the situation that occurred on May 13, 2023 in the Bryansk region?

      If you are deep in the affected area, then no BKO will help.
    2. +3
      6 March 2024 12: 42
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      Will BKO "Vitebsk" help in the situation that occurred on May 13, 2023 in the Bryansk region?

      It won’t help, but not so much as a result of the aircraft being in the guaranteed interception zone, just outside it, but due to the fact that American missiles like AIM-120 and possibly MIM-4a, I may be wrong about MIMs, have a targeting mode an interference source that activates automatically if the target interferes with the missile's seeker. In this case, the onboard electronic warfare is an assistant for the missile and not protection against it.
      1. +1
        6 March 2024 17: 32
        Quote: JD1979
        that American missiles of the AIM-120 type and possibly MIM-4a, I may be wrong about the MIMki, have a guidance mode to the source of interference that is activated automatically if the target interferes with the missile's seeker.

        Even old missiles like R-4R, R-23R, R-40R, not to mention the more modern R-27ER or R-77-1, can retarget interference.

        Quote: JD1979
        In this case, the onboard electronic warfare is an assistant for the missile and not protection against it.

        Interference can be not only masking, but also distracting or imitating.
        1. +2
          6 March 2024 19: 26
          Quote: Lozovik
          Even old missiles like R-4R, R-23R, R-40R, not to mention the more modern R-27ER or R-77-1, can retarget interference.

          Maybe they can, but it’s not mentioned anywhere.
          Quote: Lozovik
          Interference can be not only masking, but also distracting or imitating.

          Again, the rocket somehow makes a selection and goes to the source of the interference. Does it make a difference in the type of interference if it essentially travels in anti-radar mode along the coordinates of the radiation source?
          1. 0
            7 March 2024 10: 20
            Quote: JD1979
            Maybe they can, but it’s not mentioned anywhere.

            What do you mean it's not mentioned anywhere?

            Quote: JD1979
            Again, the rocket somehow makes a selection and goes to the source of the interference.

            It should go to the source of interference if the head fails to take the target for automatic tracking in angles or range. To answer more accurately, you need to know the logic of its operation.

            Quote: JD1979
            Does it make a difference in the type of interference if it essentially travels in anti-radar mode along the coordinates of the radiation source?

            Eat. The head is protected in different ways from different types of interference.
        2. 0
          9 March 2024 08: 52
          But the head, ALEXANDER PAN STATED THAT on December 25, 2015,
          KRET handed over electronic warfare systems to the Ministry of Defense for the protection of transport aviation
          MOSCOW, November 30 - RIA Novosti And created new traps with a jammer for radars
          Concern "Radio-electronic Technologies" (KRET, part of Rostec) has developed a new type of aviation decoys for the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation - disposable jamming transmitters (POI). An electronic warfare station is fully assembled in an ordinary standard aviation cartridge - it has an antenna, a chemical power generator, ensuring the operation of the transmitter for several seconds or tens of seconds,” the press service said. It begins to emit interference signals that are targeted in the frequency spectrum and structure. That is, the generator (POI) is a trap, an electronic warfare station that can be fired on - it has an antenna, a chemical power generator, ensuring the operation of the transmitter for several seconds or tens of seconds,” the press service said. It begins to emit interference signals targeted in the frequency spectrum and structure, that is, it works like a towed electronic warfare system and is located outside the aircraft and a missile is coming at it, or am I wrong ? They even say that when the last A-50 was shot down, one missile exploded from the trap and the second one had already hit the A-50?
      2. +1
        6 March 2024 17: 47
        Quote: JD1979
        In this case, the onboard electronic warfare is an assistant for the missile and not protection against it.

        For this purpose, there are towed sources of interference: https://topwar.ru/12650-buksiruemye-lozhnye-celi-raytheon-v-ale-50.html
        1. +2
          6 March 2024 19: 28
          Quote: DenVB
          For this purpose, there are towed sources of interference:

          Both towed and decoys, such as MALD, but unfortunately not with us.
          1. +2
            6 March 2024 23: 22
            Quote: JD1979
            Both towed and decoys, such as MALD, but unfortunately not with us.

            MALD does not affect RGSN. MALD is designed to simulate a raid in order to activate the combat mode radar. But the SPOI (disposable interference transmitter), which you did not insist on, exists in the Russian Federation.
        2. 0
          6 March 2024 23: 19
          Quote: DenVB
          Quote: JD1979
          In this case, the onboard electronic warfare is an assistant for the missile and not protection against it.

          For this purpose, there are towed sources of interference: https://topwar.ru/12650-buksiruemye-lozhnye-celi-raytheon-v-ale-50.html

          The not very ancient RGSN detects the presence of a towed source of interference and is capable of making corrections to the guidance. When approaching towards the target, the bearing of the target is greater than the bearing of the towed trap, while following - vice versa.
          1. +1
            6 March 2024 23: 31
            Quote: Comet
            ... When approaching towards the target, the bearing of the target is greater than the bearing of the towed trap, while following - vice versa.

            Damn, I wrote about the wrong thing... The bearing is always on the target, both towards and after. less than the bearing to the towed trap. The towed trap, due to its flight in the flow disturbed by the carrier, produces specific Doppler components.
      3. +1
        6 March 2024 23: 14
        Quote: JD1979
        It won’t help, but not so much as a result of the aircraft being in the guaranteed interception zone, just outside it, but due to the fact that American missiles like AIM-120 and possibly MIM-4a, I may be wrong about MIMs, have a targeting mode an interference source that activates automatically if the target interferes with the missile's seeker. In this case, the onboard electronic warfare is an assistant for the missile and not protection against it.

        This is not true. The task of the on-board SAPS is to redirect the missiles towards itself with interference from the RGSN and disrupt the guidance by turning off the interference and/or retargeting the seeker to a false target, for example, by illuminating the cloud of the background (the radiation of the SAP is not directed at the seeker).
      4. 0
        9 March 2024 08: 43
        But the head, ALEXANDER PAN STATED THAT on December 25, 2015,
        KRET handed over electronic warfare systems to the Ministry of Defense for the protection of transport aviation
        MOSCOW, November 30 - RIA Novosti And created new traps with a jammer for radars
        Concern "Radio-electronic Technologies" (KRET, part of Rostec) has developed a new type of aviation decoys for the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation - disposable jamming transmitters (POI). An electronic warfare station is fully assembled in an ordinary standard aviation cartridge - it has an antenna, a chemical power generator, ensuring the operation of the transmitter for several seconds or tens of seconds,” the press service said. begins to emit interference signals targeted in the frequency spectrum and structure
  4. 0
    6 March 2024 05: 08
    As countermeasures, units for shooting false thermal targets and dipole reflectors, an active jamming station, as well as optical-electronic suppression devices based on lasers are used. Thus, a radar-guided air defense system is exposed to passive or active interference that disrupts tracking and guidance. Infrared seekers are deflected using LTC or directionally suppressed by a laser.

    Is there anything against RBS 70?
  5. BAI
    +2
    6 March 2024 06: 05
    Mi-8AMTSh with "Vitebsk".

    This is about this program - “Military Acceptance”. There, these electronic warfare devices - such as barrels on the edges of the suspension - were called "eggs of life." They say this name has taken root among the troops.