Old weapons: what year were the Danish F-16s made?

25
Old weapons: what year were the Danish F-16s made?
This handsome guy has already flown away. E-070, manufactured in 1983, in service since May 1984. Transferred to the Danish Air Force in May 1997. Crashed October 27, 2015 in the North Sea


It was reported that the Danish Ministry of Defense plans to transfer the first F-16s to Ukraine in the summer of 2024. This is not the first such promise, so we'll see. The Netherlands also promised a lot of things, but so far they have not delivered anything. As they write in the news, the machines are being prepared.



Airplane produced in 1978


Throughout the entire length stories discussing the issue of transferring the F-16 to the Ukrainian Air Force, everything was not discussed. There were issues of training Ukrainian pilots, maintenance issues, and issues of supply of spare parts and ammunition. Perhaps only one issue was not discussed. F-16s are very old and already well-worn vehicles.

The Danish Air Force once bought 77 F-16 fighters. Once upon a time - that's a long time ago. Deliveries under the first contract began in January 1980, and under the second contract in August 1984. Then there were two more broadcasts from the US Air Force in 1994 and 1997. Subsequently, the Danish aircraft underwent several stages of modernization into the Block 20 MLU modification.

The main fleet of Danish F-16s was produced in 1978 and 1980, as follows from their serial numbers listed on the website f-16.net.

The planes from the very first order have already been written off, cut up, or become museum exhibits. Of the 38 units produced in 1978, to date, 10 aircraft have been written off, 10 are in storage, and only three are flying.

The aircraft, produced in 1980, are mostly flying; out of 21 units, only one, the ET-626, was cut up in March 2021. Before this, the aircraft, having flown 4,4 thousand hours, was sent for storage at Aalborg airbase in August 2003.


E-187, manufactured in 1978, entered the Danish Air Force in February 1981. Sent for storage in December 2011, cut in May 2016. Typical fate of old aircraft

There are also later cars, produced in 1983, 1986 and 1987. The most recent Danish F-16 was produced, according to its serial number, in early 1988, delivered to the Danish Air Force in October 1989 and is reportedly flying with tail number E-018.

Thus, the Danish F-16s are old aircraft that have already completed their flight life, or are reaching their last hours.

One of the oldest Danish F-16s, produced in 1978 and delivered in April 1981, was still flying in January 2020 as an E-190 with 730 Squadron of the Danish Air Force. More than 40 years in service!


I just love this photo for its absurdity. Here the Dutch Air Force is showing Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky a miracle plane with which he will defeat Mother Russia. The tactical number of the aircraft is J-641. He says that this machine entered the Dutch Air Force... September 30, 1983! Manufactured in 1980. More than 40 years in service! The newest and most modern fighter to seize air supremacy! The main thing is not to fall apart on a bend

For sale for scrap


These wonderful aircraft were supposed to be in operation until 2020-2025, when they were planned to be replaced by the F-35. Time is inexorable. The oldest F-16s had to be either written off or sent into storage. But the deadlines for decommissioning the next batch of aircraft are approaching. The Danish Air Force was going to get rid of them with some benefit. In 2021, the Danish government agreed to sell 12 to Florida-based American firm Draken International, with an option for another 28 aircraft. The company provides training and training services for the US Air Force.

The planes were sold under the ELOT (End Life of Type) program, that is, actually for scrapping. Instead, F-2022A were supposed to arrive from 35. Four such aircraft were delivered to the 727th Squadron of the Danish Air Force; another 6 aircraft, already received by Denmark, remained at Luke Air Force Base in Arizona for pilot training. In total, Denmark ordered 27 F-35As back in 2016. Only in September 2023 did the first aircraft actually enter service with the troops.

Next, the American company agreed to buy six more F-16s from the Danish Air Force, with delivery dates in 2024. But the deal fell through in June 2023. After this, planes began to be offered to Ukraine as a means of seizing air supremacy.

Gnawing under the carpet


In the whole story with the F-16s being transferred to Ukraine, you don’t really know what to be surprised about. It’s an amazing thing to offer aircraft that were produced 30-40 years ago as a means of turning around the war in the air! And there are people who truly believe in this.

However, reviewing the circumstances of this case that have become known, one can assume the following background to this strange story. It was no longer a question of replacing old aircraft with new ones. Denmark has received less than half of its F-35 order after seven years of waiting. In anticipation of the arrival of new aircraft, the Danes slowly sold off the old ones. But then there was confusion. Of the 10 F-35s formally delivered to Denmark, only four reached the air force of this country, and six remained at the actual disposal of the Americans. Great business! Danish planes fly, spend hours, which must also be paid for by the Danes, but used by the Americans.

It seems that in such a situation the idea of ​​transferring the F-16 to Ukraine arose. Its goal was to put pressure on the Americans: they say, we are at war, we are giving the last planes to the Ukrainians, the Russians are advancing - in short, drive the F-35s that were ordered, paid for and even already transferred. Most likely, there is no strategic intent here; There is a fierce squabble under the carpet. To achieve its goals, the Danish government agreed to sacrifice several old planes, which it was going to sell anyway, and the Ukrainian pilots who would fly in them.

It is difficult to offer another version here. It is unlikely that anyone in their right mind will be confident that a dozen or so aircraft, old and on the verge of being written off, will be able to really turn the tide of hostilities.

I also think that the Americans will not appreciate the Danish idea. They themselves fly terribly worn-out F-16s and F-15s, which have flown every conceivable time and therefore sometimes break down in the air. These aircraft still make up the bulk of the US Air Force fleet, paradoxically. Blaming them for flying such junk aircraft could be fraught with danger. The Americans may be offended and impose some sanctions.
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    27 February 2024 05: 55
    No matter how old they are, they are still weapons, weapons that can shoot, deliver missile strikes, etc. - i.e. kill both our guys on the LBS and civilians on our territories. And therefore you shouldn’t give a damn.
    It would be great if our guys covered the supplied litaks BEFORE their first combat missions.
    Preventively.

    PS If they are really that old, well, they will all fall apart from wear and tear on the first flight.
    1. -13
      27 February 2024 08: 07
      No, the fact that they are old is what deprives them of the ability to kill. Firstly, the engines are for scrap metal, they need to be replaced, and this is a huge amount of money, then the equipment is rubbish, which means the combat properties are at the level of the first Mig29.
    2. +1
      27 February 2024 17: 59
      Old... not old... modern aircraft (4th generation and above) is more of a platform for delivering/launching weapons
      F-16 ... if they have undergone some kind of modernization, they carry all the nomenclature that they did and are doing in NATO
      But here the question is how much it was given to them or will be given, because missiles, bombs, etc. also cost good money... Another question is about pilots, servants, fuel reserves, secrecy of deployment and the ability to return at least after the first flight
  2. +11
    27 February 2024 06: 12
    Old weapons: what year were the Danish F-16s made?
    The author completely forgot to point out that during the existence of this machine it was repeatedly modernized. Avionics and on-board electronics changed, additional suspensions were added and removed, new engines were installed on the aircraft, and the design of the aircraft itself more and more absorbed radio-absorbing materials, approaching the fifth-generation aircraft that had already set everyone on edge. This machine is still in service with many countries, including the United States, and it should not be treated as some kind of iron trash. In addition, Denmark is a rich country, a NATO member, and simply by default cannot afford to have outdated weapons
    1. -15
      27 February 2024 08: 09
      Well, let's start with the fact that engines generally change often and most likely these ones are already subject to write-off. Avionics, even if they changed in the early 90s, means dull old stuff. Well, what kind of radio-absorbing coating, do you believe in it yourself?
      1. +11
        27 February 2024 09: 31
        Quote: Victor Sergeev
        Well, let's start with the fact that engines generally change often
        Let's start with the fact that in some cases engines are not just changed due to the exhaustion of their service life, but sometimes they are also replaced with more modified ones, and therefore more advanced ones, which have absorbed all the latest achievements of science and technology. And throughout the history of operation of the F-16 there have been several such replacements
        Quote: Victor Sergeev
        Avionics, like electronics in general, even if they changed in the early 90s
        Avionics, like all electronics in general, is generally a special song; just like engines, it is replaced with each new improvement. Sometimes this is even done without any announcements, it is simply replaced and that’s it
        Quote: Victor Sergeev
        Well, what kind of radio-absorbing coating, do you believe in it yourself?
        They believe in God, but I know. To reduce radar signature, the F-16 design uses radar-absorbing materials, which significantly increase the vehicle's capabilities and give it the characteristics of fifth-generation aircraft. And before you waste air in the comments, first read at least a little about this plane
        Quote: Victor Sergeev
        sad old stuff
        It seems that sad performance about modern technology and its further modernization just sits firmly in your head and doesn’t want to come out
    2. -11
      27 February 2024 08: 11
      The article says that all Danish F 16s were modernized to Block 20 MLU, and this is a modification of 90-91 years, and there was no replacement of the engine, as well as major changes in the fuselage, the modernization mainly concerned the integration of weapons, including the Harpoon anti-ship missiles, Aim 120
      1. +5
        27 February 2024 13: 13
        Quote: Vitaliy161
        The article says that all Danish F 16s were modernized to Block 20 MLU, and this is a modification of 90-91 years, and there was no replacement of the engine, as well as major changes in the fuselage, the modernization mainly concerned the integration of weapons, including the Harpoon anti-ship missiles, Aim 120

        You never know what is written in the article, in fact Denmark has Block 50, modernization was carried out in the 00s...
        Here is an article on this topic https://uacrussia-livejournal-com.turbopages.org/turbo/uacrussia.livejournal.com/s/48812.html
        Yes, the car is not exactly new, but it was a relevant modernization until the end of the 00s, taking into account the possibility of replacing radars, avionics and other things, it is very likely that they will reach their neighbor in an intermediate form between block 50 and block 70... in terms of resource and technical The state also has an incomprehensible point - during the modernization, the body was also rebuilt, there is nothing there anymore from the cars of the 80s.
        Aviation in general in terms of modernization is a very complex thing, it’s not a tank, there’s no armor... for example, the Indian MiG-21s, after modernization to the “buffalo” level, were more advanced than the Pakistani F16s, although they were almost 20 years older...
        1. -9
          27 February 2024 13: 30
          Quote: parma
          You never know what is written in the article, in fact Denmark has Block 50, modernization was carried out in the 00s...
          Here is an article on this topic [media=https://uacrussia-livejournal-com.turbopages.org/turbo/uacrussia.livejournal.com/s/48812.html]

          so from your reference, Denmark has the F 16MLU in service, this is block 20, that’s why they are being written off because it is an ancient modernization
          1. +4
            27 February 2024 13: 55
            Quote: Vitaliy161
            Quote: parma
            You never know what is written in the article, in fact Denmark has Block 50, modernization was carried out in the 00s...
            Here is an article on this topic [media=https://uacrussia-livejournal-com.turbopages.org/turbo/uacrussia.livejournal.com/s/48812.html]

            so from your reference, Denmark has the F 16MLU in service, this is block 20, that’s why they are being written off because it is an ancient modernization

            Are you sure you know how to read?...
            Here is a direct quote from the article “The modernized aircraft, after installing modern cockpit equipment, avionics and a radar complex, in its characteristics approached the F‑16C/D Block 50 modification and received the designation F‑16MLU or F‑16AM/VM”... MLU generally stands for Mid -Life Update, those modernization program in the middle of the aircraft’s service life (those f16s as models, it was planned to replace them by the 2030s) ... the whole idea was that aircraft in versions up to block 40 inclusive would be upgraded to the version current at that time, those are about block 50... until 1997, modernization was being developed, European cars were modernized until 2003, then work began on modernizing the cars of other customers, including under this program, the Pakistani side 20 was modernized in 2010-2014... how does your logic work, how was it possible upgrade Pakistani block 20 to block version
            20 in 2014?)
            The F-16 is being written off not because the car is old and bad, but because they are buying new f35s, this is a planned modernization of the air forces of NATO countries with the purchase of new generation vehicles...
  3. -8
    27 February 2024 08: 57
    It was immediately clear that new blocks 70/72 would not be given; block 50/52 was also very doubtful. But the 20/25 block, even in a modified form, is old stuff. Not to mention the fact that outside the NATO combat system, it loses a significant part of its capabilities. Yes, they will create problems, but talking about a radical change in the war in the air is not even funny.
    1. +5
      27 February 2024 09: 35
      Quote: TermNachTER
      Yes, they will create problems, but talking about a radical change in the war in the air is not even funny
      Of course, there won’t be any fracture, but this fighter could spoil our blood
      1. -8
        27 February 2024 11: 24
        There were already a lot of wunderwaffles - “javelins”, “hymers”, “leopards”, “patriots”, “storm-shadow”. Now the “Abrams” - so far none of them have radically improved the situation for the Banderlogs. In my opinion, they are helped much more by the chaos in the ranks of the RF Armed Forces. Once the mess is over, the situation will become catastrophic for Banderland.
  4. +6
    27 February 2024 08: 58
    They themselves fly terribly worn-out F-16s and F-15s, which have flown every conceivable time and therefore sometimes break down in the air. These aircraft still make up the bulk of the US Air Force fleet, paradoxically. Blaming them for flying such junk aircraft could be fraught


    Dear author, your election vote (article) has been taken into account. I look forward to your comments on the news about the shelling of the Belgorod region and Donetsk.
  5. +13
    27 February 2024 09: 36
    The Danish Air Force was going to get rid of them with some benefit. In 2021, the Danish government agreed to sell 12 to Florida-based American firm Draken International, with an option for another 28 aircraft. The company provides training and training services for the US Air Force.

    The author undertook to write, but complete ignorance of the “enemy” language and loyal fussiness played a cruel joke on him - in English, Dutch is not Danish, but Dutch. Danish in English - Danish. As a result, the title of the article is about Danish aircraft, but the content in them is about Dutch ones, that is, everything that is written in the article about the F-16 has nothing to do with the Danish F-16.
    The aircraft were sold under the ELOT (End Life of Type) program

    The F-16 End Life of Type (ELOT) is a Dutch program.
    How can such nonsense be published - a question for the editors.
    1. +8
      27 February 2024 11: 36
      Quote: Dekabrist
      Dutch is not Danish, but Dutch. Danish in English - Danish

      Taking off my hat... hi
      1. +10
        27 February 2024 14: 17
        The main thing is not even that the author confused the Netherlands and Denmark. All these bravura tunes of propagandists and agitators about old airplanes are due to a complete misunderstanding of the issue. Americans and Europeans act very intelligently. It is irrational to use new aircraft to test the infrastructure, gain experience and improve the skills of ground and flight personnel. Moreover, no one is planning air battles. And these aircraft are quite capable of handling air defense missions and launching air-to-surface weapons. And once we gain the necessary experience and a positive result, newer aircraft will fly, there is no doubt about that.
  6. -10
    27 February 2024 09: 55
    Good news. The Danes act in the interests of Russia. All this old falling apart crap will finally undermine their defense capabilities. And then the Great Prophecies of the Great Strategist Staver will immediately come true!!!!
  7. +5
    27 February 2024 11: 34
    These aircraft still make up the bulk of the US Air Force fleet, paradoxically. Blaming them for flying such junk aircraft could be fraught with danger. Americans may be offended

    The entire American F-16 fleet has undergone deep modernization and, in terms of its characteristics, can be guaranteed to withstand fifth-generation fighters. They, of course, will eventually be replaced by F-35s, but for now they are still confidently in service. An old horse won't spoil the furrow...
  8. -1
    27 February 2024 11: 49
    In terms of gaining air supremacy, and indeed the prospects for air combat in general, all this junk can be considered second-rate. The threat lies elsewhere. They carry air-to-surface weapons with a range of 300 km or more and, as a launch platform, are very good. This is what we will have to deal with first.
  9. +4
    27 February 2024 12: 52
    What year is the Su 24? They are definitely not newer.
  10. +6
    27 February 2024 20: 07
    The author is simply fantasizing, diluting it with idle talk.
    Subsequently, the Danish aircraft underwent several stages of modernization into the Block 20 MLU modification.

    If the author had expanded this phrase of his, it would have turned out that the European F-16s are not the latest modernization of the F-16s, but quite modern, with a serious update of the electronics, and not ancient. But if the author had written about this, the article would not have worked.
    Or this-
    airplane, having flown 4,4 thousand hours, in August 2003 was sent to storage at Aalborg airbase.

    The author in the article sprayed a lot of words, but did not ask, what kind of resource does the F-16 actually have?
    And if I had inquired, I would have found out that the F-16’s assigned service life is 8000 hours; it is a very durable aircraft.
    Moreover, the Americans, having carried out a cycle of testing and research on the aircraft after flying 8000 hours, came to the conclusion that it was possible to extend it to 12 hours (and some aircraft flew 000 hours during testing).
    But if you write something like this, how will you get the intended article about how they are old and about to fall apart? So the author didn’t write....:(((
  11. +1
    27 February 2024 23: 49
    No one is going to perform aerobatics on them. This is a means of delivering cruise missiles and AMRAAM to the launch line with target designation from NATO aircraft and satellites. Ukrainian Su-24s have been fighting for 2 years now, but they have not been completely destroyed. And the f-16x will be much larger and there will be no more pilots
    1. +1
      28 February 2024 01: 41
      F-16s are quite capable of using inexpensive glide bombs in the front line area.
  12. 0
    1 March 2024 08: 52
    Everyone persistently writes about electronics and avionics. There is one more basic element. This is an airframe, but it remains the same, released from the factory, and it is in it that metal fatigue accumulates. As long as he holds the plane, it flies. What will the electronics mean if your wing just falls off?