Vietnamese driver's armor

36
Vietnamese driver's armor

If we talk about personal armor protection equipment (hereinafter referred to as SIBZ) and the war in Vietnam, then what first comes to mind is the classic image of an American infantryman in unbuttoned armor and a steel helmet, which has become ingrained in the subconscious thanks to the all-powerful Hollywood and many American war films of various kinds. degree of quality. We don’t associate North Vietnamese soldiers with individual armor, literally at all. Meanwhile, the Vietnamese used body armor and helmets, and even quite en masse... True, it was far from the front. This happened on the so-called Ho Chi Minh Trail.


Soviet ZIL-157 on the Ho Chi Minh Trail.

The vehicles had special designs that visually changed the silhouette of the truck from the air (so that the cabin was not clearly outlined) and were also intended for attaching camouflage.



Such designs were first used by Chinese and Korean drivers during the Korean War. It can be seen that they tried to cover the vehicles with homemade bamboo “armor,” which often had a purely psychological effect. Well, here are the results of the work of landscape designers from the US Air Force. The volume of “cast iron” that fell on the trail every day was sometimes comparable in tonnage to the massive bombing of German industrial centers several decades earlier.

At the beginning of the conflict, namely the involvement of the Americans in it, the trail was a network of country roads and often real trails, along which sometimes only horse-drawn vehicles and bicycles could pass. And the Vietnamese simply weren’t very good at transport. For example, in 1965, along the entire route, the length of which with all branches, backups, passes and trails entering the territory of South Vietnam was more than 10 thousand kilometers, only 90 trucks operated.

Plus the course was a network of dirt roads and trails that were very exposed to weather conditions. Given the rainy season, certain sections of this, without exaggeration, “road of life” could be closed to cars for weeks and months.


One of the variants of the Chinese body armor of the Vietnamese People's Army. Photo from the website of a Western antique salon. The price is quite humane, only 999 US dollars... not even a thousand.

But this was the case when the route appeared and in the first half of the 1960s. The track has evolved and improved constantly. At the peak of its capacity, the “trail” became a real route along which entire convoys walked, transporting tens of tons of cargo. Yes, this was not the case everywhere, and the route did not immediately become a real “highway,” but still. Moreover, the Vietnamese often found themselves one step ahead of the Americans. For example, when the Americans learned about the existence of a pipeline for pumping fuel along the route, several pipeline regiments of the Vietnamese People's Army were already operating there.


Soldiers of a transport company dig up a ZIL-130 on one of the sections of the highway during the rainy season, Ban Dong district, southern Laos, 1970. The fighters are seen wearing early type body armor with a large collar.

But the Americans, who perfectly understood the value of this transport artery for supplying both regular troops and partisans, tried as best they could to reduce its capacity. How? Basically they bombarded us with explosives... A lot and constantly.

Artillery, helicopters, and planes, often directed by special forces, were used; they worked along the route day and night. US Air Force and Navy aircraft were literally hovering over some sections of the route. For example, the joint operation of the US Air Force and Navy - Operation Tiger Hound, which began back in 1965, lasted several years, during which the route was almost constantly under attack from the American aviation.

Sometimes special forces directed them from the ground, even despite the fact that along the borders of South Vietnam the route passed through the territory of a neighboring state. It was a war, basically, without rules...


Formation of soldiers of the 13th Automobile Regiment, March 13, 1973. The photo was taken during a visit to the unit by General Vo Nguyen Giap. The soldiers are equipped with Chinese body armor and Soviet and East German-made helmets. Some helmets have white stripes for easy identification

The soldiers and military experts who worked on the route itself to ensure and improve it, naturally, suffered from constant fire from American aviation. And it was these unique personnel, worth their weight in gold, that it was decided to equip with SIBZ, a thing, frankly, rare in other parts of the North Vietnamese army.


ZIL-157 goes on the road. The fighters are wearing Chinese body armor. The steel protective elements visible through the fabric are clearly visible.

The protective elements were steel plates in a “case” made of thick cotton fabric.

Body armor had at least two options. A feature of one type was a very large collar, which, if desired, could almost completely cover the fighter’s head. The bulletproof vests were produced in China and were equipped with the same fittings as the Chinese uniform and the famous “chikom” type 56.


Statement of the combat mission in an amateur photo of the soldiers of the 13th regiment. GDR steel helmets and Chinese body armor on the fighters. In the background is materiel from the Likhachev plant.

In fact, it was not the body armor we are used to now, but a design closer to what the Americans called a flak vest. That is, individual armor protection designed to protect against fragments.

The term itself dates back to World War II, when the first bulletproof vests were introduced en masse into the American armed forces. They were intended for bomber crews suffering from fire from German anti-aircraft guns - Flugabwehrkanone, or simply FlaK, in fact, hence the name.


Construction of an autobat on ZIL-130. All fighters are wearing early body armor with a large collar.

Chinese body armor was supplied to individual transport companies of the North Vietnamese army operating on the Ho Chi Minh Trail. Moreover, all units were not equipped with them, but only those that operated in the most dangerous areas. That is, even in transport units on the “trail” they never became a widespread phenomenon.


General Dong Shi Nguyen (in the center, in a Soviet steel helmet) visiting an automobile unit equipped with a ZIL-130. Dong Chi Nguyen led all operations on the “trail”, and it was under his leadership that victory in the logistical confrontation with the Americans was forged.

The decision in general is absolutely logical and understandable. Armor never became truly widespread; at the front it would have been a piecemeal phenomenon and would not have had an impact on the situation anyway. And here in the rear there are qualified and valuable personnel who suffer from American superior firepower. Why not protect them.


View of the body armor from the back.

Any war is a war of logistics. So it is not surprising that it was the Vietnamese who decided to protect with personal armor those who saddled the most difficult and dangerous Ho Chi Minh Trail.

As a result, this factor also became a drop in the common pot in which the victory was brewed, which was also achieved on the logistics front, but this, as usual, is a completely different matter story.


Not just the Vietnamese. Cuban workers and engineers at the construction site of one section of the Ho Chi Minh Trail, 1973.
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    28 February 2024 05: 25
    Interesting information, thanks!
    They were intended for bomber crews suffering from fire from German anti-aircraft guns.

    Anything more progressive than a frying pan under the fifth point during the First World War!
    Have a nice day, everyone!
  2. +12
    28 February 2024 05: 39
    A real break in the pattern; in fact, before this, the thought had not even arisen that the Vietnamese were using body armor on a fairly large scale. My respect to the author! hi
    Armor never became truly widespread; at the front it would have been a piecemeal phenomenon and would not have had an impact on the situation anyway. And here in the rear there are qualified and valuable personnel who suffer from American superior firepower. Why not protect them.

    Another reason is that the driver does not run, but rides while sitting, so the load of very heavy armor on the musculoskeletal system is minimal, unlike infantry.
    1. mz
      +1
      28 February 2024 14: 13
      Quote: Vladimir_2U

      Another reason is that the driver does not run, but rides while sitting, so the load of very heavy armor on the musculoskeletal system is minimal, unlike infantry.

      Not entirely true: in a sitting position, the load on the spine is higher than in a standing position, and the dynamic load when driving on bad roads is definitely no less than when walking. Only the load on the leg joints is less.
      1. 0
        28 February 2024 16: 07
        Quote: mz
        Not quite so: in a sitting position, the load on the spine is higher than in a standing position, and the dynamic load when driving on bad roads is definitely no less than when walking.

        There is such a thing, but in a sitting position the driver rests on the seat and back of the seat and affects the spine much less than when walking.
    2. 0
      28 February 2024 20: 23
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      Before this, the thought had not even arisen that the Vietnamese used body armor on a fairly large scale.

      So, where do they come from if such thoughts did not arise from the word “vabche”! Emptiness ! Unfortunately, the author did not mention “straw” body armor! And the Vietnamese had them! The Vietnamese "weaved" from rice straw (possibly other similar materials...) protective "vests" (one might say "body armor"...) in the form of shields! Such shields could be hung on the chest, chest and back, was to protect the groin and buttocks! It could be hung on the doors of truck cabs... Such “body armor” appeared during the period of mass use of ball bombs by the Americans. But they could provide good protection from various fragments!
      1. 0
        29 February 2024 03: 22
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        So where do they come from if such thoughts did not arise from the word “vabche”! Emptiness !

        Was there a void filler?

        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        Unfortunately, the author did not mention “straw” body armor!
        Well, fill in the blank, there’s an article there, or at least links.
  3. +4
    28 February 2024 06: 35
    GDR, USSR - steel helmets.
    PRC - body armor.
    I wonder if the Chinese “armored armor” is a copy or its own design “based on American principles”?
    1. +2
      28 February 2024 07: 05
      Chinese armored vehicles are a copy or their own design

      Purely Chinese inventions:
      1 gunpowder
      2 kung fu
      3 paper
      4 request Your suggestions?
      1. +4
        28 February 2024 10: 56
        They forgot about the most important thing - the compass, also a Chinese invention)
    2. +3
      28 February 2024 07: 44
      Quote: hohol95
      Interesting - are the Chinese armored vehicles a copy or their own design?
      These are the kind of vests, with a folding collar, that I saw on British soldiers patrolling the streets of Ulster. I saw it on TV when I was still in school
    3. +4
      28 February 2024 10: 20
      I wonder if the Chinese “armored armor” is a copy or its own design “based on American principles”?

      This is a Chinese development, and specifically for the Vietnamese. Two versions were produced, the first with composite protection (fiberglass, steel, ceramics), the second with aluminum plates. And “for themselves” the Chinese produced body armor with fiberglass plates.
      1. +2
        28 February 2024 12: 28
        Even the Chinese made body armor for themselves.
        But in the USSR it turns out they produced a batch of 6B1s, sent them off for storage and that’s it.
        Until Soviet soldiers began to die in Afghanistan.
        It was?
        1. +3
          28 February 2024 15: 22
          It was?

          Yes, there were no plans to produce body armor in peacetime. At the enterprises that were supposed to produce them in wartime, stocks of materials and related equipment were kept. After this, until 1980, when the issue rose to the level of the CPSU Central Committee, work on PPE for the army was not carried out, only for the Ministry of Internal Affairs (ZhZT-71).
          1. +1
            28 February 2024 15: 26
            Soviet soldiers - They are STEEL from birth...
            Ministry of Internal Affairs and KGB.
            They write that the bosses from the Ministry of Internal Affairs wanted to purchase foreign armored vehicles, but they were not given any currency.
            And they puzzled the industry with the production of “armored armor”, like that of the Swiss policemen.
            1. +2
              28 February 2024 15: 50
              And they puzzled the industry with the production of “armored armor”, like that of the Swiss policemen.

              Honestly. I don’t know all the details, but in terms of concept and design, the titanium ZhZT-71M weighing 8 kg, which even held a TT bullet, is in no way similar to Kevlar police body armor, including Swiss ones.
              1. +2
                28 February 2024 18: 24
                Article on VO "Domestic Army Body Armor"
                23 February 2012 year.
                1. +2
                  28 February 2024 19: 49
                  There was information that bulletproof vests and helmets for special forces of the USSR and the GDR were purchased from Tig Bicord AG through dummies, but I can’t say how they influenced the design of Soviet bulletproof vests. Photos of "Alpha" in Swiss body armor and helmets can also be found if you search.
  4. +6
    28 February 2024 06: 50
    . Construction of an autobat on ZIL-130.

    . ZIL-157 goes on the road. ... Soviet ZIL-157 on the Ho Chi Minh Trail.

    It turns out that galoshes were not only sold to Africa.
    It’s nice to read how the whole of Vietnam rode on Soviet galoshes!
    It’s a pity that the capitalists came and “import-substituted” the legendary ZIL.

    . The Americans, who perfectly understood the value of this transport artery for supplying both regular troops and partisans, tried as best they could to reduce its capacity.

    And in Ukraine they will somehow try to disrupt logistics. Bomb bridges, for example?
    1. +7
      28 February 2024 07: 39
      You can't destroy bridges, they're someone else's stop
      1. +3
        28 February 2024 07: 48
        About bridges. I don’t believe that there are no means to destroy them. Bandera’s followers don’t have this! But at the same time they managed to blow up our most important bridge twice. What do we have? After all, there wasn’t even a symmetrical response.
        1. +2
          28 February 2024 08: 26
          What do we have? After all, there wasn’t even a symmetrical response.
          There were attempts to blow up the bridge in Zatoka, even a naval drone was used. But to no avail.
          1. +2
            28 February 2024 08: 50
            Quote: Aviator_
            There were attempts to blow up the bridge in Zatoka, even a naval drone was used. But to no avail.

            Why is this to no avail?
            Now, due to serious damage to the bridge in Zatoka, the enemy is using an alternative route - by road along the E87 road, passing west of the Dniester estuary.
            08.08.23
  5. +2
    28 February 2024 11: 43
    The last photo is a revelation for me. I didn’t know about the Cubans working on the Uncle Ho trail.
  6. +1
    28 February 2024 12: 30
    Interesting photo of an autobat on a ZIL-130tykh. All cars do not have a right headlight. Although in the previous photo the ZIL has all the headlights in place.
    1. +1
      28 February 2024 15: 30
      Blackout in Vietnamese...
      So that in the darkness of a tropical night, American pilots would decide that they were motorcyclists... or cyclists.
    2. +3
      28 February 2024 15: 33
      Most likely they are saving a valuable device by placing it only in front of the driver. Second one in stock...
    3. +2
      28 February 2024 15: 40
      Interesting photo of an autobat on a ZIL-130tykh. All cars do not have a right headlight. Although in the previous photo the ZIL has all the headlights in place

      In Vietnam, you drive on the right. Therefore, the right headlights of the supplied cars were immediately dismantled for use as a repair kit.
      1. -1
        28 February 2024 23: 50
        Quote: Dekabrist
        In Vietnam, you drive on the right.

        I will probably surprise you, but in the USSR there was and in the Russian Federation there is also right-hand traffic.
        1. +2
          29 February 2024 00: 14
          Yes, you surprised me. I was never able to grasp the hidden meaning of your comment. Maybe you didn’t read mine to the end?
          1. 0
            29 February 2024 07: 32
            Quote: Dekabrist
            Maybe you didn’t read mine to the end?

            About the fact that the right headlight was immediately removed into the spare parts? Again, let's start with the fact that in the photo above the 130th stands with both headlights, and the 157th with both headlights in all photos. Or were the headlights supplied separately for the 157s? Traffic along the Ho Chi Minh Trail was practically one-way, like on a single-track railway line.
  7. -1
    28 February 2024 18: 57
    Given the rainy season, certain sections of this, without exaggeration, “road of life” could be closed to cars for weeks and months.

    In fact, it was worth flooding the area more. After all, then it would be possible to use much more heavy-duty rafts and boats, which, in addition, could carry durable steel shelters from shrapnel and bullets. Boats and especially rafts are easy to make - you don’t need a complex automotive industry, just simple carpentry tools at the level of a rural blacksmith and a flat shore at a shipyard, you don’t even need an engine, since there is a sail. Yes, and the American special forces would have increased because of this - since you cannot hide in a swamp and in water like in an ordinary forest.
    1. +1
      28 February 2024 23: 40
      Yes, there is a flat shore at the shipyard, you don’t even need an engine, since there is a sail.

      Through the jungle on a raft under sail - are you talking about a hitherto unknown type of masochism?
      1. 0
        29 February 2024 06: 15
        Quote: Olegi1
        Through the jungle on a raft under sail

        This is exactly what it looks like in the natural climatic conditions there. The Internet is full of such photos from Vietnam. A river flows along the banks of a tropical swamp and jungle. There are boats on the river, including sailing ones. If a lowland is flooded, the forest on the site of the future canal is cut down to clear the road.
        The only difference is that sailing cargo rafts (and these are also built) and knitted reed boats for the conditions of the Ho Chi Minh Trail are faster and cheaper than wooden boats and they are more resistant to damage factors - for example, they are not afraid of fragments and water hammer in the water from ruptures and are undemanding in operation .
      2. 0
        April 13 2024 15: 08
        Through mountains and hills - absolutely masochism!)))
  8. +1
    29 February 2024 12: 02
    A little-known page in the history of the Vietnam War. They say it was a hell of a job.
  9. 0
    April 26 2024 01: 42
    Quote: Popandos
    Chinese armored vehicles are a copy or their own design

    Purely Chinese inventions:
    1 gunpowder
    2 kung fu
    3 paper
    4 request Your suggestions?

    Porcelain.
    Novel.
    And most importantly - the cult of an educated person.