Heavy UAV "Partizan" took off

51
Heavy UAV "Partizan" took off
"Partizan" during flight tests, February 16, 2024


Since 2019 Siberian Research Institute aviation named after S.A. Chaplygina (SibNIA, Novosibirsk) from the National Research Center “Institute named after. NOT. Zhukovsky is developing a promising heavy unmanned aerial vehicle "Partizan". To date, SibNIA has carried out the necessary research, completed the design and built an experimental UAV of a new type. In addition, its flight tests began recently. During the first flight, Partizan demonstrated the new capabilities and potential of the project.



First flight


The first flight of the experimental Partizan took place on February 16. To ensure safety and collect all necessary data, the UAV flew in manned mode. Test pilot and director of SibNIA Vladimir Barsuk worked in the preserved cockpit.

The manned drone successfully took to the skies and remained in the air for approx. 20 minutes. The flight was carried out at an altitude of 200 m. During the flight, various parameters and features of the product were checked - controllability, maneuverability, etc. In addition, already at this stage we paid attention to speed characteristics, which occupy a special place in the project. During the first flight, the Partizan's ability to fly at speeds from 50 to 200 km/h was demonstrated.

The start of flight tests was called successful. The UAV confirmed the calculated takeoff and landing characteristics, and also coped with the task of flying at ultra-low speed. Tests will continue in the near future. The plan is to confirm all key parameters and then move on to unmanned flights. At the same time, an automated control system will be developed that has the necessary functions and application options.

At the final stage of testing, Partizan will have to transport people and cargo with or without a pilot, as well as take off and land on sites of a minimum size. Having demonstrated all these capabilities, the UAV will be able to enter service and go into production.


First flight

The timing of the conduct and completion of flight tests, as well as the start date of production and operation, cannot yet be announced. Apparently, the necessary work will take several more years. At the same time, taking into account the pace of the work already completed and its compliance with the schedule, one can expect that SibNIA will cope with all the assigned tasks within a reasonable time.

Promising project


In 2019, the Foundation for Advanced Research launched the development work “Development and flight testing of demonstrators of an ultra-short take-off and landing transport unmanned aerial vehicle with a hybrid power plant and active airflow of the load-bearing surfaces.” The implementation of this project was entrusted to SibNIA, and the topic was assigned the code “Partizan”. According to plans at that time, over the next five years SibNIA was to develop a new project and build a technology demonstrator aircraft.

Until 2021-22 The implementing organization dealt with the theoretical part of the new project and also carried out the necessary research. At this stage, general ideas and technical solutions for a promising project were formed. A dynamically similar model was also tested in a wind tunnel and in flight.

In 2022, on the basis of the existing TVS-2MS multi-purpose aircraft, a flying laboratory was built to test and test new ideas in the field of propulsion and aerodynamics. In June of the same year, the flying laboratory made its first runs along the runway and also took off. With its help, the potential of new technical solutions was shown, and work on the main Partizan project continued.

For 2022-23 It was planned to build two full-fledged experimental UAVs of a new model. Unlike the already manufactured flying laboratory, they had to receive a full set of new devices and instruments. Once ready, the prototypes were planned to be launched for ground and flight testing.


In recent weeks and months, SibNIA completed the construction of the first Partizan, and then carried out the necessary checks on the ground and prepared it for flight. The first flight took place a few days ago, and more will follow. All this indicates the successful progress of the project and the solution of the assigned tasks. As requested by the customer, a new UAV with the necessary functions appeared in 2024.

Ultrashort takeoff and landing


As is clear from the name of the R&D project, the goal of the Partizan project is to create a UAV with improved takeoff and landing characteristics, obtained through a special power plant and non-standard aerodynamics. In addition, the project was posed with tasks in the field of control systems, operation, etc.

The Partizan UAV is based on the TVS-2DTS aircraft, a modern analogue of the well-deserved An-2. All the main units were borrowed from the base model, and some had to be modified due to the installation of new devices and components. This approach to development simplified the creation of the project and the construction of the prototype, and also made it possible to solve the existing design problems.

The Partizan, like the TVS-2DTS, has an all-composite biplane airframe. There is an elongated volumetric fuselage that accommodates the engine compartment, cockpit and cargo-passenger cabin. The two planes have different spans and are connected to each other by wide posts at the end. A traditional tail design is also used.

The drone is equipped with a Honeywell TPE331-12UAN turboprop engine with a power of 1100 hp. and a five-bladed tractor propeller manufactured by Hartzell Propeller. An additional propulsion system is provided. It includes eight small electric motors with tractor propellers located on the leading edge of the lower wing. Energy supply is provided by a specially designed electrical network.


Flying laboratory based on TVS-2DTS, 2022

The turboprop engine is designed to create thrust, due to which the aircraft picks up speed and makes horizontal flight. Electric motors, in turn, provide forced airflow to the lower plane and improve its aerodynamic characteristics. The lifting force increases and the possibility of stable flight at reduced speeds becomes possible, as well as takeoff and landing characteristics are improved.

Due to the main turboprop engine, the Partizan, like the TVS-2DTS, should reach speeds of up to 300-350 km/h. If necessary, due to additional engines, it is capable of slowing down to 50-100 km/h without the threat of stalling. According to calculations, blowing the lower wing will allow an aircraft with a 1 ton load to take off and land on sites no more than 50 m long.

The Partizan project envisages the creation of an unmanned aerial vehicle with the ability to be directly controlled by a person. For this purpose, the aircraft retained the flight deck with control stations, but new instruments and devices were introduced. The automatic control system is capable of working according to operator commands from a remote control panel or solving some problems independently. It is reported that it is possible in principle to organize fully automatic transportation or perform other work.

Aircraft of the TVS-2 series were created as a modern replacement for the old An-2 and should solve the same range of tasks. The Partizan UAV project has similar goals. The drone must transport people and cargo, participate in search and rescue operations, work in agricultural aviation, etc. In all cases, the possibility of autonomous operation and improved flight characteristics will provide certain advantages.

The modern approach


Thus, work on creating a modern aircraft to replace the well-deserved but outdated An-2 continues and shows new results. At the same time, the use of current concepts and promising ideas makes it possible to improve the basic characteristics of the aircraft and obtain fundamentally new capabilities. As a result, the promising Partizan should be superior to the old An-2 in all respects.

However, the new multi-purpose UAV with special capabilities has so far only managed to enter flight tests. It will have to undergo a full range of checks and confirm its calculated potential, and only after this will issues of production and implementation be resolved. Apparently, this will happen in the coming years.
51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    22 February 2024 04: 13
    Everything is cool, the topic is promising, but the engine...
    And so the plane in two versions, and with such takeoff and landing characteristics, is very interesting for local lines and other inaccessible areas. The drone is purely for cargo, manned for passenger and mixed transport.
    1. 0
      22 February 2024 04: 52
      I wonder if they can remake it for VK-800S? There, of course, the power is lower, but not critical.
      1. +3
        22 February 2024 05: 01
        Quote: keleg
        There, of course, the power is lower, but not critical.

        Almost a quarter, that’s just the same... And the auxiliary ones won’t help, they also need to take energy from somewhere, most likely from a generator. To be honest, I don’t remember successful aircraft that were designed for one engine, but ended up being noticeably less powerful.
      2. +1
        22 February 2024 07: 12
        Quote: keleg
        I wonder if they can remake it for VK-800S?

        This engine was created for Baikal - clone of a newborn Partisan. Why isn't it used on Partisans - Don't know. However, even on Baikal We also once tried on an American turboprop engine...

        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        Almost a quarter, that’s just the same... And the auxiliary ones won’t help

        But domestic - the critical dependence on an unreliable supplier immediately disappears. Yes and on Baikal some kind of electric motor is also provided...
        1. +6
          22 February 2024 07: 39
          1. Having spied on the PRC, Azerbaijan used the AN-2 converted into a UAV to open the air defenses of the Armenians. Very successful.
          2. No engine - no plane.
          1. +2
            22 February 2024 10: 06
            Great example! Proven a working option using available aircraft junk. A minimum of alterations, no American engines or innovative electric motors (which are of minimal use, in my opinion).

            Today - after all, a lot of water has passed under the bridge since the time of Karabakh and UAVs have developed greatly - using the An-2 to open air defenses already seems wasteful; you can get by with small UAVs. But as a kamikaze drone with the carrying capacity of the An-2, it’s quite possible.

            And the main benefit is the low cost of such UAVs made from scrap.
          2. 0
            April 23 2024 18: 15
            There is no engine, there is a glider!
    2. +6
      22 February 2024 05: 51
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      Everything is cool, the topic is promising, but the engine...
      Not only the engine, but the entire propeller group is American
      1. +1
        22 February 2024 05: 58
        Quote: Dutchman Michel
        Not only the engine, but the entire propeller group is American

        Compared to the engine, this is so unprincipled...
    3. +2
      22 February 2024 07: 17
      The drone is purely for cargo, manned for passenger and mixed transport.

      I understand that the word drone is very fashionable now, but the AN-2 is alive and will live for a very long time due to the economic indicators of its operation. But what is the economics of operating this unit? Is the game worth the candle?
      1. +3
        22 February 2024 07: 20
        Quote: Popandos
        but AN-2 is alive and will live for a very long time due to the economic indicators of its operation

        There is monstrous fuel consumption and there are no economic indicators in sight. That’s why they’ve been looking for a new engine for about forty years now...
        1. +1
          22 February 2024 07: 31
          monstrous fuel consumption and no economic indicators at all.

          Economics is not only fuel consumption per ton kilometer, there is a lot more, and I think that Annushka is fine with this. It’s not for nothing that the AN-2 still flies, and there is no mass replacement for it with some foreign analogue, as happened in large aviation.
      2. 0
        22 February 2024 07: 23
        Quote: Popandos
        I understand that the word drone is very fashionable now, but the AN-2 is alive and will live for a very long time due to the economic indicators of its operation.

        If only I could get engines for it somewhere... And restore production.
        Quote: Popandos
        But what is the economics of operating this unit? Is the game worth the candle?
        Even with our engine, it is of course more expensive than the An-2 to produce. But in operation, due to the abandonment of the pilot, it is no longer there. It might be noticeable.
        1. +2
          22 February 2024 07: 24
          But in operation, due to the abandonment of the pilot, it is no longer there.

          We replaced the pilot with an operator, what are the savings?
          1. +1
            22 February 2024 08: 09
            We replaced the pilot with an operator, what are the savings?
            Savings on financing a flight school where pilots are trained.
            1. 0
              22 February 2024 08: 37
              Quote: Aviator_
              Savings on financing a flight school where pilots are trained.

              Not a big saving, because I’m sure that for passenger cars a pilot will be needed, and not even to take over control if anything. There will simply be fewer pilots needed for trucks.
          2. 0
            22 February 2024 08: 33
            Quote: Popandos
            We replaced the pilot with an operator, what are the savings?

            At least in terms of salary level - it differs noticeably between technical and flight personnel. Even at the level of training, it is MUCH easier and cheaper to train an operator than a pilot. And if the UAV is fully automatic, like the Buran of the 80s of the last century. and on a simple operator. And the technologies that will be needed now and later will be needed.
    4. 0
      22 February 2024 22: 48
      Everything is cool, the topic is promising, but the engine...

      In addition to the engine from Honeywell, TVS-2 was planned to have a flight and navigation system from Garmin. That is why TVS-2 did not take off, it was too expensive, and this was at a time when there was no talk about current events. If everything remains as it is, I now estimate the chances of something other than “taking off” as near zero. Despite the fact that the aircraft's characteristics are really very good.
      1. 0
        23 February 2024 15: 36
        Quote: Olegi1
        TVS-2 was planned to be a flight navigation system from Garmin

        Ours completely produces the entire set of cockpits and controls for a lot of airplanes and helicopters, so I don’t think that the PNK will become a plug.
  2. +10
    22 February 2024 04: 23
    I believe that it will never reach mass production. I keep an eye on all the work at SibNIA, since I worked there for 13 years back in Soviet times. Attempts to create a replacement for the An-2 ended in nothing due to the fact that there was no domestic inexpensive and economical engine for it. Well, there is no factory for serial production either. The Institute will not be able to handle mass production. Now they are trying to present the same project as a drone. To be honest, I don’t see any prospects or use of such a device.
    For reference: O.K. After the Second World War, Antonov was in Novosibirsk, where he simultaneously headed both the design bureau at the aircraft plant and SibNIA. So there is obvious continuity of work here. It's a pity that it's not very effective yet.
    1. 0
      22 February 2024 05: 59
      Quote from Andy_nsk
      To be honest, I don’t see any prospects or use of such a device

      There is a prospect. No engine
      1. +5
        22 February 2024 07: 05
        More precisely, you need to say: “There are no engines”! There are none at all! So, just wishful thinking.
        1. 0
          22 February 2024 07: 56
          Quote: 2112vda
          "No engines"! There are none at all! Yes, just wishful thinking
          There is an engine! Unfortunately, Honeywell is American, but they plan to make a complete copy of it by 2027. How do the Chinese usually do it?
          1. +2
            22 February 2024 08: 22
            yes, yes, there are a lot of plans lol
      2. 0
        22 February 2024 09: 48
        What's the prospect? UZGA is finishing the engine for Baikal, it should start flying with the VK-800SM in the summer, a plant for serial production is being built in Komsomolsk-on-Amur. And what kind of production does this TVS-2MS have?
        1. +1
          22 February 2024 10: 51
          Quote from shikin
          And what kind of production does this TVS-2MS have?

          Its release is just around the corner, it's up to the engines. It’s sad, but at first it will fly on American engines.
          1. 0
            22 February 2024 11: 28
            So they will be made, as they were done - that is, one by one. It's unlikely that it will come to a series.
    2. 0
      22 February 2024 11: 39
      Quote from Andy_nsk
      Attempts to create a replacement for the An-2 ended in nothing due to the fact that there was no domestic inexpensive and economical engine for it.

      Well, it’s logical - where will it come from if you don’t do it? I just imagined how the USSR abandoned its aviation because there were no suitable engines. And from the vigorous loaf, since there were no long-range bombers for him
  3. +1
    22 February 2024 04: 48
    As a result, the promising Partizan should be superior to the old An-2 in all respects.
    I wish I could find out how to “exceed” due to what really revolutionary innovations.
    1. +2
      22 February 2024 06: 23
      I wish I could find out how to “exceed” due to what really revolutionary innovations.

      There are innovations, for example, the widespread use of composites. There are no prospects - without an economical domestic engine.
      1. 0
        22 February 2024 14: 08
        There are no economical small-sized turbines in nature and there never will be. At the moment, aviation diesel is the most economical in terms of the required power, but the complexity of manufacturing outweighs the savings. It's the same nonsense with composites. No modern copy is profitable.
        The Chinese are no slouch when it comes to economics, they still produce AN2 clones, albeit with normal avionics)))
        1. 0
          22 February 2024 18: 01
          I can’t say anything about engines, I don’t work with them, but I’m willing to argue about composites (I had to work with fiberglass and basalt plastics), I think that the use of composites in aviation is promising, duralumin is becoming a thing of the past.
  4. +2
    22 February 2024 05: 57
    The turboprop engine is designed to create thrust, due to which the aircraft picks up speed and makes horizontal flight

    Oil wink
    1. 0
      22 February 2024 07: 29
      This is what aeronautics was heading towards. And you can’t refuse this.
      1. 0
        22 February 2024 11: 14
        Quote: Prokop_Svinin
        This is what aeronautics was heading towards.

        Not aeronautics, but aviation! Aeronautics means balloons and airships, devices that are LIGHTER than air.
        1. 0
          22 February 2024 12: 42
          Aeronautics came, and aviation took over and rose.
    2. 0
      25 February 2024 10: 34
      Here you just had to add that “eight electric motors create an air screen for accelerated takeoff” and attach an old video with a short takeoff: https://youtu.be/jL7_KfD6ZmE?si=g0E0tS28Kw2vC_Ke
  5. 0
    22 February 2024 07: 42
    At the final stage of testing, Partizan will have to transport people and cargo with or without a pilot, as well as take off and land on sites of a minimum size. Having demonstrated all these capabilities, the UAV will be able to enter service and go into production.


    do we have so much money? - to distract them from the SVO?
    wouldn't it be easier to put pilots there????
    how smart-ass they are at twisting the budget....
    1. 0
      22 February 2024 07: 59
      Quote: Dedok
      do we have so much money? - to distract them from the SVO?
      Even during the war, theaters, libraries and music schools were financed in the USSR. And then it was all about the survival of the country
    2. +1
      22 February 2024 08: 41
      Quote: Dutchman Michel
      Even during the war, theaters, libraries and music schools were financed in the USSR. And then it was all about the survival of the country

      And I’ll add that the design of passenger aircraft in the USSR began before the end of the Second World War.
  6. +5
    22 February 2024 08: 07
    The drone is equipped with a Honeywell TPE331-12UAN turboprop engine with a power of 1100 hp. and a five-bladed tractor propeller manufactured by Hartzell Propeller.
    After this, you don’t have to read the note. And I congratulate SibNIA on yet another distribution of allocated funds.
    1. +4
      22 February 2024 11: 25
      Two questions confuse me.
      Solution for ultra-short takeoff/landing by installing additional engines for blowing the wing, in my opinion, are not the most successful. Usually this issue is solved through powerful mechanization of the wing, and not by violating the aerodynamics of the device. I remember that the Germans’ Storch took off almost without a run-up against a strong wind.
      The option of unmanned operation here is clearly unnecessary, far-fetched and not economically justified.
    2. -1
      22 February 2024 12: 20
      Well, to be fair, it’s not SibNIA’s task to produce domestic engines; this should be done by more serious structures
      1. +1
        22 February 2024 17: 57
        Well, to be fair, it’s not SibNIA’s task to produce domestic engines,
        Naturally, this is not their task. But promoting a deliberately failed design in the hope of snatching funding with zero yield - what is that?
        1. -1
          22 February 2024 18: 06
          This is an attempt to somehow survive, apparently. This is a grant from the Seed Fund, and not some large-scale work by Rostec, which is building a plant somewhere in parallel.
          1. +1
            22 February 2024 18: 10
            This is an attempt to somehow survive, apparently.
            Doing deliberately failed work? Strange attempt. Reminiscent of the methods of the 90s, get a loan for work and run away, and the “Zits-chairman Pound” will sit.
            1. -2
              22 February 2024 18: 29
              Why failed? Has the corn plant taken off? Took off. Work is done? Done. And that for the most part, grants do not lead to a revolution in science and technology, this is probably already clear to everyone. This is how the entire grant system in Russian science is structured. You either work like this or change your profession. This is a question for the FPI, whether it is going to do something with the results of this successful work. Scale up, transfer to domestic equipment, apply the results obtained to other models. They are the customers of the OCD
  7. +1
    22 February 2024 08: 24
    But what, our wonderful overseas ones continue to supply aircraft engines to the Russian Federation?
  8. +1
    22 February 2024 16: 43
    The drone is equipped with a Honeywell TPE331-12UAN turboprop engine

    What a clever idea to put an American engine on a plane :))
    And call it a drone. Of course, the topic is fashionable.
  9. 0
    22 February 2024 22: 36
    Manned drone...
    Why report this? About the first flight of a drone controlled by a pilot (or pilot) located inside the drone.
  10. 0
    23 February 2024 09: 12
    Well what can I say. What we have. Replacement of An 2 at a modern level plus a drone based on it. This is good??? Very. This should have been in the episode yesterday.
    The downside is the engine. But there is hope.
    The demand for such a complex is enormous. The export potential is huge. A lot of people need a machine with short takeoff/landing and low stall speed.