The Cowardly General's Excellent Rifle

39
The Cowardly General's Excellent Rifle
Colt 1855 percussion revolving rifle. For use by snipers, it was equipped with an optical sight mounted above the barrel. Photo of the National Museum stories USA, Washington


“Rougeau, uncle? - Bondarenko guesses. - You're lying. Is this really rouge? You could also say in village language: rushnytsa. It was a gun at home, but in the service it was simply called: a small-caliber rapid-fire infantry rifle of the Berdan system, number two, with a sliding bolt.”
"Duel". A. I. Kuprin

People and weapon. The progress of military affairs in the middle of the 19th century was so rapid that the military could barely keep up with the designers who were offering more and more new and advanced models of rifles. One of them, which, one might say, made an entire era in the history of arms making in Russia, was the rifle of the American gunsmith Hiram Berdan.




Hiram Berdan (1824–1893). Library of Congress

Berdan was born in 1824 into a family of immigrants from Holland who lived in New York State. His father, John Berdan, was a successful landowner and gave Hiram the opportunity to study as a mechanical engineer at college after school, although he never received a diploma. From childhood he loved hunting and was an excellent shooter, and in 1861 he became the champion of the Northern States of America in shooting. And after graduating from college, he showed a penchant for invention. Moreover, he received his first patent for... a separator back in 1847, after which he began producing agricultural machinery. In 1853, a new invention followed - a gold mining machine, which brought him a handsome profit. Moreover, he even founded a gold mining company.

When the Civil War began in the United States in 1861, Berdan joined the northern army as a volunteer, and not only did he join, but being an excellent shooter, he decided to create a sniper unit in the army and wrote an appeal to the governors of the northern states, inviting the best shooters to join sniper companies. In June 1861, he organized an entire regiment of snipers, led it himself and organized combat training, dressing all his soldiers in dark green uniforms, while all other northerners fought in dark blue.

The selection for Berdan's unit was extremely tough. During the tests, volunteers had to fire 10 shots from a rifle with a conventional scope from a distance of 200 yards (182 m) and place all the bullets exactly in the bull's eye of a target with a diameter of no more than 5 inches (127 mm). Those who “smeared” were rejected without any pity.

The practical Berdan armed his snipers with Colt revolver rifles equipped with telescopic sights as long as the barrel on which they were mounted. These rifles had a high rate of fire, but could be dangerous for a careless owner who, in the heat of battle, forgot to coat the chambers of the drum with “cannon fat”, which is why, when fired, all the charges in the drum ignited simultaneously (“chain fire”), which destroyed the rifle and the left hand of the shooters was crippled.

It is interesting that Hiram Berdan himself was not particularly brave in battles and in every possible way avoided direct participation in battles and, having given the appropriate orders, immediately left the battlefield. Because of this, he was even court-martialed twice, which is why he even had to resign.

However, even without his direct leadership, Berdanov’s riflemen were highly effective in battle and inflicted serious damage on the enemy. As a result, the successes of his regiment, and then of Berdan’s brigade (who, despite outright cowardice, eventually received the rank of general, which was greatly facilitated by his connections “at the top” and excellent organizational skills) gave rise to the formation of ten more similar regiments, whose soldiers wore their green uniforms with pride. In the federal forces, sniper units were usually in the command reserve or represented separate units within the corps. This made it possible to use them at critical moments of the battle, in breakthrough areas to suppress fire or repel a successfully advancing enemy.


An 1859 Sharps rifle with a sniper scope, adopted by Berdan snipers in 1862. Photo of the Horse Soldier auction company

By the way, Berdan himself, having weighed all the pros and cons, already in May 1862 re-equipped his shooters with Sharps rifles, which were loaded from the breech with paper cartridges and had a fairly high rate of fire. By the way, back in the 1880s, American military historians claimed that Berdan's snipers killed more Confederate soldiers than any other unit in the Northern army.

In 1862, Berdan was wounded and left command, and after recovery he began recruiting new snipers, visited a number of weapons production plants and again began working on creating a rifle of his own design. Already in September 1864, Berdan offered the Colt company a rifle of his design, but did not receive a positive response and then again organized his own company to produce it. And his labors were not in vain: the rifle was accepted in Spain to convert old muzzle-loading rifles into breech-loading rifles of 15,24 mm caliber.


Berdan Rifle No. 1 Photo by Rock Island Auction Company

In 1865, Berdan designed a bolt action and his own cartridge for the 10,67 mm caliber. And then it turned out that in America at that time there were representatives of the Artillery Committee of the Main Artillery Directorate of Russia, Colonel A.P. Gorlov and Captain K.I. Gunius. Having examined over a hundred different types of weapons chambered for a cartridge with a metal sleeve, they settled on the Berdan rifle. And our military representatives liked it so much that they offered to order 30 thousand Berdan rifles and 7,5 million cartridges for them at once for Russia, and also took an active part in its refinement, which is why in America this sample was even called “Russian” rifle."


Berdan Rifle Bolt No. 1. Photo by Allen Dobress


The inscription on the barrel of Berdan rifles No. 1, supplied to Russia from the USA. Photography by Allen Dobress

Then Captain Gunius took samples of the rifle and cartridge to Russia, and Colonel Gorlov had to remain in America to organize work at American military factories. As a result, in 1865 it was finally decided to adopt it into service with the Russian Imperial Army under the name “4,2-line rifle mod. 1868 Berdan system No. 1.” Although it had a folding bolt that had already become familiar at that time, tilting forward along the barrel, its feature was the absence of a traditional trigger that struck the firing pin. Instead, a longitudinally sliding firing pin entered the rear part of the bolt, located in the rear of the receiver and acted by the force of a spiral spring. That is, to load this rifle it was necessary to first push the firing pin back by the handle, then tilt the bolt forward and only then insert the cartridge into the chamber. Having closed the shutter, it was possible to press the trigger, which released the firing pin, which not only broke the cartridge primer, but also additionally locked the shutter itself. The sight was calibrated for a distance from 200 to 1500 steps, and a triangular bayonet was attached to a barrel with six grooves (from the bottom of the barrel). The maximum rate of fire of the rifle reached 18 rounds per minute.


Schematic diagram of the Berdan rifle No. 1 and its details. Drawing from V. G. Fedorov’s album. Atlas of drawings for “Armament of the Russian Army in the XNUMXth Century”

Such an initiative was of very great importance, since it was at this time that the Russian army was in a state of rearmament and was switching to new types of rifles, and it was necessary not to make a mistake in choosing a suitable system in order to quickly provide the army with a reliable, modern and at the same time relatively cheap weapons. So, in November 1866, the rifle of the Englishman Terry, modified by gunsmith I.G. Norman in Tula, was adopted for service. The rifle was a percussion rifle and fired a traditional paper cartridge, which did not make it a modern weapon, but it was advantageous in that it was relatively easy to convert old percussion rifles that were loaded from the muzzle into it. Moreover, it had a sliding bolt and a rate of fire of 5-6 rounds per minute.

In the same year, another Englishman, Karle, proposed a needle rifle for arming the Russian army, in which the primer was located in a wooden circle at the bottom of the cartridge case. It fired up to 10 rounds per minute and was put into service in 1867 in two versions: infantry and small arms. The first sight allowed shooting at only 427 m, and the second - at 853 m, which clearly indicated that the Russian military of that time underestimated long-range shooting. Converting muzzle-loading rifles into needle rifles was not cheap, so only 215 units were produced and were actively used during the Russian-Turkish War of 500-1877.


Krnka rifle. Drawing from V. G. Fedorov’s album. Atlas of drawings for “Armament of the Russian Army in the 19th Century”


Bolt and cartridge for the Krnka rifle. Drawing from V. G. Fedorov’s album. Atlas of drawings for “Armament of the Russian Army in the 19th Century”

In 1869, the Russian army immediately received two conversion rifles with metal cartridges: N. M. Baranova (very similar in design to the Albini-Brandlin rifle) and the Czech Sylvester Krnka of 15,24 mm caliber, into which the 1856 rifles were converted ., as well as Terry-Norman rifles 1866 and Karl 1868. Baranov rifles went to the navy, and Krnka, nicknamed “krynki” in our country, went to the ground army. Both rifles had hinged bolts, but Baranov’s opened to the front, while Krnk’s opened to the left. Few of the first were produced, only 9872, but the Krnka rifles were produced in 855, which was very good on the eve of the impending war. It was then that the very accurate Berdan No. 500 rifles arrived just in time, turning out to be the most advanced among this entire arsenal.


Berdan cartridge according to the 1866 patent. Drawing by A. Sheps

It was also important that in addition to the rifle, Berdan also designed a cartridge for it, which, as it turned out, turned out to be very successful. First of all, the find was a seamless sleeve made of brass, inside of which a brass cup was again inserted to strengthen the bottom part. Before him, sleeves were made from red copper and its alloys, but brass gave less residual deformation. A charge of carbon nitrate powder weighing 5 g provided the bullet with an initial speed of 440 m/s. The bullet, a solid lead weighing 24 g, was wrapped in thin linen paper, twisted at the base. Such a bullet wrap, by the way, proposed by Gorlov and Gunius, protected the bore from leading and improved the fastening of the bullet in the cartridge case. The wrapper was two-colored - white and pink paper. This is how cartridges for a rifle and a carbine differed. The latter had a smaller powder charge. The fully loaded cartridge weighed 40 g.


Berdan cartridge according to the 1868 patent. Drawing by A. Sheps

As “Weapons Collection” No. 1 for 1877 wrote,

“The proposed cartridge, tested in America, gave brilliant results. The cartridge case withstood ten reloads, the defect rate did not exceed 0,5%.

In terms of ballistic characteristics, the Berdan cartridge, improved by Gorlov and Gunius, was one of the best cartridges with a metal sleeve of that time.


Berdan rifle No. 2 with two types of bayonets: the old triangular Russian army and the new tetrahedral one. Photo by Rock Island Auction Company


Berdan Rifle Bolt No. 2. Photo by Allen Dobress

But then Berdan himself became interested in the prospects of cooperation with the Russian army and in the spring of 1870 he went to Russia to offer his latest development - a rifle with a rotary sliding bolt. It was simpler in design than the folding one, cheaper to manufacture and provided better extraction of spent cartridges. Now the shooter did not need to remove the empty cartridge case from the chamber - it flew out of it on its own, which made it possible to increase the rate of fire of the new rifle to 28 rounds per minute - an excellent indicator for that time! As a result, this Hiram Berdan rifle was adopted by the Russian Imperial Army, called “Berdan No. 2”. On its basis, a cavalry carbine, dragoon and Cossack rifles were developed, differing only in their length: carbine - 965 mm, dragoon rifle - 1237 mm, Cossack rifle - 1237 mm, and infantry rifle - 1355 mm. Initially, Berdan No. 2 rifles were manufactured in England at a factory in Birmingham.


Russian Imperial Army soldier with Berdan rifle No. 2. XNUMXth century photograph

However, already in 1873, their production was established at the Tula and Izhevsk arms factories, where they were produced until 1891, and the appearance of a more advanced and faster-firing repeating rifle by Captain Mosin. Berdan rifles received well-deserved recognition, received the affectionate name “Berdank” among the troops and were used to a limited extent even during the First World War, and subsequently, after drilling out the barrels, they were sold to hunters.


Berdan rifles of the 1870 model, adopted by the Russian Imperial Army. Drawing from V. G. Fedorov’s album. Atlas of drawings for “Armament of the Russian Army in the XNUMXth Century”

It is interesting that for some reason Colonel Gorlov at that time was more sympathetic to the Remington rifle with a tap action, but he did not like the Berdan rifle No. 2. And he, apparently, sent a memo to the Minister of War, General Milyutin, in which he asked to take a closer look at the Remington rifle. But Milyutin showed no interest in it and wrote a rather sarcastic note, which said that Russia is not the Papal State or Egypt, and that it is very important for Russia to develop its own production of modern weapons. That is, he assessed the possibilities of its design from the point of view of perspective, which, as we have already written here, was absent in the Remington rifle.


The bolt device of the Berdan rifle No. 2. Drawing from the album of V. G. Fedorov. Atlas of drawings for “Armament of the Russian Army in the XNUMXth Century”

Hiram Berdan died in Washington, surrounded by honor and respect, on March 31, 1893. His not too courageous character did not prevent him from going down in history...
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    25 February 2024 05: 31
    Thank you!
    Interesting read. There are word repetitions in places, but apparently due to the limited time to read what was written before publication.
    1. +8
      25 February 2024 06: 50
      Quote from Fangaro
      There are repetitions of words in places,

      This is bad. It's good that you paid attention. I'll have to re-read it again in about two hours at the earliest.
      1. +7
        25 February 2024 08: 53
        Try using a neural network to remove lexical repetitions. It makes life a lot easier, this is how I usually edit articles at work.

        As it is, the article is good, but I have a soft spot for revolver rifles.
  2. +10
    25 February 2024 05: 43
    I liked the article - it’s easy and pleasant to read, thanks Vyacheslav Olegovich!
    1. +11
      25 February 2024 06: 54
      Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
      easy and enjoyable to read

      We are trying, Vladislav! Thank you very much!
      1. +1
        25 February 2024 16: 12
        Hello, Vyacheslav and thanks!))
        In the photo, by any chance, is Colonel A.P. Gorlov and Captain K.I. Gunius testing the Berdan rifle?
        1. +1
          25 February 2024 17: 03
          Quote: Sea Cat
          Colonel A.P. Gorlov and Captain K.I. Gunius testing the Berdan rifle

          Maybe they are, but I can’t say 100% sure.
  3. +3
    25 February 2024 05: 58
    I always said that Vyacheslav Shpakovsky has good articles wink
    1. +8
      25 February 2024 06: 52
      Quote: faiver
      good articles

      They would be even better if I were younger and went to museums. But soon there will be a continuation of this article with color photographs just from the museum. It is difficult to obtain information in our country. Difficult! And expensive!
      1. +3
        25 February 2024 06: 57
        the path to truth is thorny and long.... hi
        1. +4
          25 February 2024 13: 07
          Quote: faiver
          the path to truth is thorny and long

          This is how people often make it themselves!
  4. +8
    25 February 2024 10: 12
    The most interesting thing is that the paper, as tests showed, did not reduce lead in the barrel.
    1. +2
      25 February 2024 15: 52
      Quote: irontom
      The most interesting thing is that the paper, as tests showed, did not reduce lead in the barrel.

      Vitaly! I’m surprised... can’t write why and how this was found out?
      1. +2
        25 February 2024 17: 49
        The Zen blog "Historical Weapon Science" cited selections from the article "On metal cartridges for Russian small-caliber rifles", published in the "Arms Collection"
        https://dzen.ru/a/Yya7z-cZIBbTLoCb
        1. 0
          25 February 2024 18: 04
          Quote: irontom
          The Zen blog "Historical Weapon Science" cited selections from the article "On metal cartridges for Russian small-caliber rifles", published in the "Arms Collection"
          https://dzen.ru/a/Yya7z-cZIBbTLoCb

          Thank you! We'll have to respect our competitors...
        2. +2
          26 February 2024 20: 39
          Quote: irontom
          irontom
          (Vitali)

          Thanks for the interesting information!
  5. +14
    25 February 2024 10: 59
    It was then that the very accurate Berdan No. 1 rifles arrived just in time,

    If we are talking about the Russian-Turkish War, then they didn’t have time request
    Only guardsmen and grenadiers were armed with Berdanki, and most of the infantry fought off the war with the Berdanki. And this is not the worst option, since the nagel-gewers of Karle were still in service with the units of the Caucasian Front.
    Interestingly, at the beginning of the war there were more than 200 thousand Berdan guns in warehouses, which exceeded the number of troops involved in the campaign. But the gentlemen generals did not dare to rearm, and therefore our soldiers had to resist the Turks with Henry rifles and even Winchesters.
    There were regiments that were re-equipped with trophies right during the war.
    P.S. And the article is good feel
    1. 0
      26 February 2024 23: 29
      Quote: Senior Sailor
      Interestingly, at the beginning of the war there were more than 200 thousand Berdan guns in warehouses, which exceeded the number of troops involved in the campaign. But the gentlemen generals did not dare to rearm

      As far as I understand, the Berdan tanks were intended to rearm the western group of troops deployed against Austria. And the Crimean group was supplied secondarily.
      1. 0
        27 February 2024 11: 24
        Quote: Saxahorse
        And the Crimean group

        What group? belay
        If anything, Berdan rifles No. 1 were adopted for service in 1868.
        The Karle rifle with its 15.2 mm caliber is clearly not suitable for shooting at 800 meters, but hope never dies.

        Perhaps and I suppose have nothing to do with it. At that time, the troops attacked in columns. Battalion or, at worst, company. And they fired at them in volleys. For such a target you can hit 800 steps.
        1. 0
          28 February 2024 00: 18
          Quote: Senior Sailor
          If anything, Berdan rifles No. 1 were adopted for service in 1868.

          There was a problem with the fittings, I was just reading about them. What is typical, just like in the Crimean War, when the newest guns remained in the rear, in the Russian-Turkish War of 1877-78 the newest Berdan guns also remained in large quantities in the rear, and the troops in Bulgaria were mostly armed with Karl and Krynka rifles.
          Quote: Senior Sailor
          Perhaps and I suppose have nothing to do with it. At that time, the troops attacked in columns. Battalion or, at worst, company. And they fired at them in volleys. For such a target you can hit 800 steps.

          800 steps but not 800 meters. For a 6-line rifle, the probability of hitting a growth target at 600 steps is 33%, and at 1000 steps it is only 10% (step = 0.75m). And this was in ideal conditions when the distance was known very accurately. Line infantry were not allowed to shoot beyond 600 steps, only rangers (shooters).

          Well, in those days they didn’t go on the attack in columns... You’re confusing everything with thirds right. They advanced in columns and turned around in a line. A cannon in a column with one cannonball will kill 20-30 soldiers. By that time the artillery had already forced itself to be respected.
          1. +1
            28 February 2024 14: 57
            Quote: Saxahorse
            There was overlap with the fittings

            That's what I thought)
            Quote: Saxahorse
            Well, in those days they didn’t attack in columns...

            How we went
            Quote: Saxahorse
            You're right, you're confusing everything with thirds.

            I'm not confusing anything. The transition from column tactics to rifle chains occurred in Europe during the Franco-Prussian War, and in our country during the Russian-Turkish War of 1877-78.
            Moreover, the German generals were very indignant. They say the wrong soldier went. Ours too.
            Quote: Saxahorse
            A cannon in a column with one cannonball will kill 20-30 soldiers.

            The battalion will endure
            However, the reason for the transition was precisely the artillery. Only in rapid-fire and shooting diaphragm shrapnel. Well, rifles
            1. 0
              28 February 2024 22: 09
              Quote: Senior Sailor
              I'm not confusing anything. The transition from column tactics to rifle chains

              I agree with you. I got a bit excited about this issue. hi

              Although in the regulations, back in Arakcheevsky, linear tactics were prescribed and the soldiers were drilled for it, they also went on the attack in columns. Napoleon confused everyone. I would just like to note that there was no such name - “column tactics” at that time; nevertheless, linear tactics continued to be considered the main one, and columns were looked at as a means of massing an attack in selected directions. Moreover, it is very costly in terms of losses even in case of victory.

              And I remembered linear tactics because of the difference in sights for shooters and infantry. Although formally they had already been leveled in armament, they still looked at the infantry as intended to fight in close combat and with bayonets, therefore, in order to save ammunition, they only had sights up to 600 steps, and shooters were trained for fire combat and they had sights for 1200 steps laid.
              1. 0
                29 February 2024 13: 08
                Quote: Saxahorse
                Napoleon confused everyone.

                As far as I remember, not really.
                The tactics of columns and loose formation (as it is called in specialized literature) began to rule during the Revolutionary Wars, when Bonya was still in command of a battery. The troops were still lined up, but not en masse as in the seven-year period, but in separate detachments, with intervals where the skirmishers could go. The light infantry conducted fire training, and the line infantry attacked in close formation. Of course, a cannonball hitting a column would cause trouble, but in the days of smoothbore guns this was unlikely.
                However, the infantry's firepower grew and the columns became smaller. If in the time of Napoleon there could well have been a regimental column, then by the middle of the century the maximum was a battalion column. And the Prussians have a whole company squad.
                As for the Russian army on the eve of 1877-78, the battalion had five companies, four line and one rifle. But they were all armed the same. During the fighting, it became clear that the formation could not be fought against Henry rifles and Krupp breech-loading guns. Therefore, instead of columns, all infantry began to form in chains. After the war, the rifle companies were decommissioned and formed into fourth battalions in the same regiments.
                Quote: Saxahorse
                I agree with you. I got a bit excited about this issue.

                Who are you and where are you taking Saxonhorse?
                recourse
                1. 0
                  1 March 2024 00: 16
                  Quote: Senior Sailor
                  The tactics of columns and loose formation (as it is called in specialized literature) began to rule during the Revolutionary Wars, when Bonya was still in command of a battery.

                  Probably not quite so. The tactics themselves have been known since the times of hoplites and legionnaires - light infantry in front, heavy infantry behind in a tight group. The new mobilization French army had to remember this because yesterday’s peasants were not trained in step techniques, so they had to come up with something simpler. But there is a nuance! laughing During the time of the hoplites there were no cannons. Napoleon, being himself an artillery general, took this nuance into account and came up with artillery preparation that preliminarily suppressed enemy batteries in the direction of attack. But this did not always work out. For example, at Waterloo, d'Erlon's corps, advancing almost in one column in tight formation, was almost completely knocked out by cannons and rifle fire.

                  Quote: Senior Sailor
                  As for the Russian army on the eve of 1877-78, the battalion had five companies, four line and one rifle. But they were all armed the same.

                  Again, not entirely accurate. The same weapons were only planned during the Milyutin reform, while the regiments were supposed to switch to a four-battalion structure with four companies of the same weapons. In fact, by the beginning of the war, only the guard had been transferred to this composition; the rest remained in three-battalion regiments of the same composition as you called, four line and one rifle company. And they were armed just differently. The riflemen use Berdans and Krynkas with an aim at 1200 steps, and the infantry with Krynkas with an aim at 600 steps. And even the Berdan guns that began to be issued to the infantry also had a short sight at first.

                  Quote: Senior Sailor
                  Who are you and where are you taking Saxonhorse?

                  Here you go. It was enough to miss a year and they stopped recognizing it. smile
  6. +5
    25 February 2024 13: 56
    Berdan rifles received well-deserved recognition, received the affectionate name “Berdank” among the troops and were used to a limited extent even during the First World War, and subsequently, after drilling out the barrels, they were sold to hunters.

    In 1895-1905, about 200 Berdan No. 000 rifles were converted by Belgian companies to chamber 2x7,62R. For the “three-line” Berdan gun, a new barrel and a new bolt stem with two lugs were made. The sight was also changed for a new cartridge. Judging by the fact that a fairly large number of such rifles went to Austria as trophies, their use during the First World War was not so limited.
    In the photo - at the top is the "classic" Berdan II rifle, at the bottom - the "three-line" version.
    1. +3
      25 February 2024 15: 53
      A photograph of the rifles of an American collector named Pavlov?
      1. +1
        25 February 2024 16: 35
        A photograph of the rifles of an American collector named Pavlov?

        No, this is a photo from a Hungarian website.
  7. +1
    25 February 2024 14: 09
    The idea of ​​a longitudinally sliding bolt in Berdanka #2 is, of course, progressive. But it was implemented disgustingly. If we look at the drawings in Fedorov's book, it looks like the bolt had only one rear lug.
    It was not for nothing that Gorlov and Gunius criticized #2.
    1. +1
      26 February 2024 23: 31
      Quote from: ln_ln
      If we look at the drawings in Fedorov's book, it looks like the bolt had only one rear lug.

      In the Deise rifle, the first bolt-action rifle, the handle itself was considered the combat rest. Espagnolette in its purest form smile
  8. +2
    25 February 2024 16: 09
    In June 1861, he organized an entire regiment of snipers, led it himself and organized combat training, dressing all his soldiers in dark green uniforms,
  9. +1
    25 February 2024 19: 46
    Let me comment on the title...
    If the general is cowardly because he did not try to come out first under enemy fire, but the troops under his control defeated the enemy, then maybe he, this general, was not cowardly, but reasonable?
    1. +1
      26 February 2024 20: 31
      Quote from Fangaro
      this general was not cowardly, but reasonable?

      This is our opinion today. At that time, anyone who rushed at the enemy in the front ranks was a hero! And the one who was behind is a coward.
  10. +3
    26 February 2024 07: 55
    Thanks to the Author, this is an interesting material for me, since this rifle often appears in historical literature, but I have never come across such a detailed description of it.

    By the way, as a child in one village, one grandfather had a “Berdanka” - I don’t know if it was really such a rifle, but this word existed “among the people” in the 60s or 70s of the last century.
    1. +3
      26 February 2024 14: 26
      I don’t know if it was really such a rifle, but this word existed “among the people” in the 60s or 70s of the last century.

      There was not only a “word”, but also a gun. And even in the 80s. I only worked part-time in a weapons workshop for a couple of years, and then I got caught.
  11. +1
    26 February 2024 23: 38
    The Englishman Karle proposed a needle rifle for arming the Russian army, in which the primer was located in a wooden circle at the bottom of the cartridge case. It fired up to 10 rounds per minute and was put into service in 1867 in two versions: infantry and small arms. The first sight allowed shooting at only 427 m, and the second - at 853 m, which clearly indicated that the Russian military of that time underestimated long-range shooting.

    The markings of the sights of that time gave little insight into the sighting range of the weapon. One could easily find a hard drive chambered for a revolver cartridge, but with a target of 2000 steps. laughing
    The Karle rifle with its 15.2 mm caliber is clearly not suitable for shooting at 800 meters, but hope never dies. smile
  12. +1
    27 February 2024 12: 30
    During the tests, volunteers had to fire 10 shots from a rifle with a conventional scope from a distance of 200 yards (182 m) and place all the bullets exactly in the bull's eye of a target with a diameter of no more than 5 inches (127 mm).

    I looked on the map about 182 meters from my window to imagine how one could aim at such a distance without optics in a 127mm circle. Doubts arose about the reality of such a thing. Now, if you mean feet and not yards, then everything is quite plausible.
    Thanks for the article, very informative.
  13. 0
    3 March 2024 22: 35
    On its basis, a cavalry carbine, dragoon and Cossack rifles were developed, differing only in their length:

    Purely out of love for the truth: the Cossack rifle did not have a bayonet (it could be shot without a bayonet), did not have a trigger guard, and instead of a trigger it had a specially trained pumpkin. Ugh, I forgot what it’s called correctly!
    The rifle was really good, the only real flaw was the 1/8-turn locking, so a well-worn rifle could easily jam the bolt into the shooter's eye.
  14. 0
    3 March 2024 22: 39
    Quote from cpls22
    During the tests, volunteers had to fire 10 shots from a rifle with a conventional scope from a distance of 200 yards (182 m) and place all the bullets exactly in the bull's eye of a target with a diameter of no more than 5 inches (127 mm).

    I looked on the map about 182 meters from my window to imagine how one could aim at such a distance without optics in a 127mm circle. Doubts arose about the reality of such a thing. Now, if you mean feet and not yards, then everything is quite plausible.
    Thanks for the article, very informative.

    This is a long-known paradox. Good shooters successfully hit a target that is supposed to be invisible to the naked eye. I haven’t tried it myself, but I’ve seen it happen. Still at the school shooting range.
    This is how someone without a bar saw where the drill was 13, where it was 13,5, and where it was 14, and saw with his own eyes.
    Man, in general, such a funny beast wink!
  15. 0
    21 March 2024 13: 36
    Quote: kalibr
    Quote from Fangaro
    this general was not cowardly, but reasonable?

    This is our opinion today. At that time, anyone who rushed at the enemy in the front ranks was a hero! And the one who was behind is a coward.


    And then Chapaev came and explained everything!