Zeppelin and zeppelins

83
Zeppelin and zeppelins
Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin in front of the rigid airship L-2


"Of all the inventions,
with the exception of the alphabet and the printing press,
those inventions
that shorten distances
have brought the greatest benefit to civilization."
Thomas Babington Macaulay

His childhood and youth were not much different from the childhood and youth of other residents of Germany, and the quiet life of a military garrison in peacetime did not particularly fascinate him, then a young lieutenant in the Württemberg army. His creativity demanded something more from life than the routine of military exercises and parades and when he died, the whole world mourned the loss of a man whose genius and foresight had transformed the airship into an aerial vehicle that proved invaluable in both peace and war time.



He lived to see hundreds of airships built according to his designs, and his personality was so closely intertwined with the creation of these aircraft that even now, more than a century later, all over the world all airships are considered precisely synonymous with his name. This is an unconscious, but nevertheless quite appropriate tribute to the man who made it possible to use movement in a new environment for humans - air.

Thanks to his energy and engineering talent, during the three years before the First World War, the German airship transport company transported more than 34 thousand passengers and several tons of mail without a single accident or damage to the aircraft!


Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin. Source: Bundesarchiv

This man, a third of whose life occurred in the “Golden Age of Airships”, is Ferdinand von Zeppelin, the son of the Württemberg minister, marshal of the royal court and textile manufacturer Friedrich Jerome Wilhelm Karl Count von Zeppelin, inventor of the famous rigid Zeppelin airships and founder of the company Luftschiffbau Zeppelin, which, after a short break, still exists today.

Just a little biography


He was born on July 8, 1838, on an island in Lake Constance, located on the border of Germany, Switzerland and Austria, studied at the military academy in Ludwigsburg, near Stuttgart (Baden-Württemberg), and became an officer in the Württemberg army. In 1858, he was awarded the rank of lieutenant in the Württemberg army, and in the same year the command granted him leave to study political science, mechanical engineering and chemistry at the University of Tübingen. However, due to the urgent mobilization of the outbreak of the Austro-Italian conflict (1859), he had to stop his studies and was drafted into the engineering corps.

Note. Austro-Italian conflict or Sardinian War (April 26 – July 12, 1859). At that time, the still young king of Sardinia, Victor Emmanuel II of Savoy, entered the war against Austria for Lombardy, which was then part of the Austrian Empire. With the help of France, this war was won, and Lombardy (except for several provinces) was included in the Kingdom of Sardinia.

Civil War in the USA


In 1863, a 25-year-old army officer and native of Württemberg, believing that much could be learned from the ongoing Civil War in the United States, requests and receives permission from King William I of Württemberg to travel to the United States to serve as a military observer during the War Between the American States.


Ferdinand von Zeppelin (with rifle) in northern Minnesota

In May of that year, he crossed the Atlantic to serve as an observer for the Union Army of the Potomac in Virginia, receiving a permit signed by President Abraham Lincoln himself that allowed him to travel with the Northern armies.

Young Ferdinand would spend nearly six months in the New World, from May 6 to November 19, 1863, when he boarded the Cunard China.* in New York for his return voyage to Europe, where he would continue his military career through two European conflicts, the Austro-Prussian and then the Franco-Prussian Wars, retiring in 1890 with the rank of lieutenant general. Now with free time, he was free to begin work on the burgeoning technical innovation for which he would become famous: the rigid, controlled aircraft that became known as the Zeppelin...


Zeppelin in company with officers at the headquarters of the Army of the Potomac. Photo by Alexander Gardner, Library of Congress

It should be noted here that during the siege of Paris during the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-1871, he tested the use of balloons in military conditions, with which it was possible to carry mail and people from Paris, which was under siege by the Germans. This impressive experience, as well as a lecture he heard from the General Director of the Postal Service of the German Empire, Heinrich von Stephan, on the topic “World Post and Balloon Travel” led Zeppelin in 1874 to the idea of ​​​​building his own airship, which was first expressed in his diary entry.

Note. It is believed that he saw his first hot air balloon in St. Paul, Minnesota, far from the battlefields of the Civil War, where on August 19 he made his first aerial ascent with balloonist John Steiner and reached an altitude of 600 feet (182,88 meters) at tethered ascent. In addition, at least one source claims that while serving in the Union Army, he observed Thaddeus Lowe's efforts to inflate balloons for the Union army.

Thaddeus Lowe (1832–1913) – professor, first aerial reconnaissance aeronaut during the American Civil War, scientist and inventor. He built and piloted his first tethered balloon in 1857 on a small farm in New Jersey. He actively promoted the theory of transatlantic balloon flights. John Steiner. Despite his early popularity as one of the pioneer aeronauts, the details of his life are little known.

As mentioned above, during the ascent in Minnesota in 1863, one of its passengers was the young Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin, who saw the world from the air and later claimed that this flight awakened his interest in aeronautics. Steiner also patented several improvements to gas generators, and his ideas continued to influence the development of lighter-than-air vehicles. One of Steiner's patents, issued back in 1869 for one of the generators, was mentioned by Boeing in a 1989 patent for an improved method for producing hydrogen. His name was last mentioned in an American newspaper in 1875.



Thaddeus Law (left) and John Steiner (right)

"Blimp-train"


So it was only after his retirement from the army in 1890, at the age of 52, that Zeppelin was able to devote himself more fully to the problems of lighter-than-air flight, and 10 years later he would build his first airship, the Luftschiff Zeppelin 1 (LZ-1).

But let's start from the beginning...

Having retired, but still remaining a military man in spirit, he viewed the idea of ​​lighter-than-air vehicles primarily as a military man and saw in it a serious contribution to the military power of Germany, hoping that his idea, subsequently embodied in technology, would be accepted into service with the imperial army and fleet, and his first efforts were aimed at gaining their support.

But he was seriously frustrated by the lack of support for the project from the military at an early stage, and, being a German aristocrat, he treated attempts to commercialize his ships with a certain degree of disdain, considering the idea of ​​transporting paying passengers to generate income unworthy of either his ships or himself.

In 1894, at the age of 56, with the help of engineer Kober, he nevertheless completed the design of his airship and presented these projects to a special commission created by the most famous German scientific authorities, and was greatly disappointed with the decision of this commission, which, although it did not find significant shortcomings in Count's design, still did not recommend building airships according to Zeppelin's plans.

This first airship of his was an air gondola consisting of ordinary spherical balloons connected to each other in the same way as train cars are connected, which caused a whole storm of ridicule and caricatures in German newspapers.

Three years later, in 1897 in Berlin, the first airship with a rigid base was lifted into the air, the creator of which was a subject of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy, David Schwartz, who died shortly before this event. And although the first flight of a rigid-frame airship almost ended in disaster, Zeppelin still appreciated the advanced ideas embedded in the design of this airship.

Note. Before moving on to the creation of the first rigid airship, it should be noted that Ferdinand von Zeppelin only improved, and did not invent from scratch, a cylindrical flying machine with a rigid frame. His final designs for the future airship were based on ideas originally conceived by David Schwarz, a Hungarian aeronautics pioneer serving in the Austro-Hungarian army, who came up with the idea of ​​creating a rigid airship that would be made entirely of metal.

But, unfortunately, Schwartz did not live to see the first flight of his airship, and then Ferdinand von Zeppelin, who saw the future of aeronautics not in soft controlled balloons, but in aircraft with a metal frame capable of transporting passengers and cargo over long distances, bought the rights to the development Schwartz with his widow.



David Schwartz's rigid-hulled airship built in 1897

Zeppelin LZ-1


Having failed with the "airship-train", he worked on the airship, but with a rigid frame, with renewed vigor and after several false starts, including even a couple of almost catastrophic tests, by 1898 the first examples of the rigid Zeppelin airship were already reliable enough to attract interest from the army and, despite many difficulties, he manages to attract the necessary private capital, and in the same year Zeppelin founded Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Luftschiffahrt (Society for the Promotion of Airship Flight), after which construction of the first zeppelin begins.


Zeppelin LZ-1

In the new design, lifting gas cylinders made from cow intestines were placed in a 128-meter-long metal frame made of aluminum frames* and stringers*, covered with a fabric shell with a smooth surface. In the supporting structure of the airship, the so-called. “scientific metal” is aluminum, the price of which dropped significantly by the end of the 14,2th century. By the same time, the new Daimler engine with a power of XNUMX hp had also passed successful tests. pp., running on gasoline.


LZ-1 in a floating hangar on Lake Constance

Finally, on July 2, 1900, LZ-1, the first rigid airship built by Zeppelin and his team, took off over Lake Constance for its first test flight, lasting only 20 minutes, and flew five kilometers, reaching a speed of 21 kilometers per hour. A total of three lifts were made on this model before it was dismantled later that year for financial reasons and the operating company was wound up. Zeppelin's aeronautical innovations continued to be rejected
public, and Emperor Wilhelm II even called Zeppellin "the dumbest of all southern Germans».

Note. LZ-1 (Luftschiff Zeppelin-1) had a length of 128 meters, a diameter of 11 meters, and 17 spherical gas cylinders made of rubberized cotton material contained about 9 cubic meters of hydrogen. Suspended under the hull were two metal nacelles - fore and aft - and each nacelle housed a four-cylinder water-cooled Daimler petrol engine producing 500 hp. With. and weighing more than 14,2 kilograms, each of which was connected by long shafts to two aluminum propellers mounted on either side of the hull. On this airship the pitch* it was adjusted not by elevators, but by means of a special sliding weight suspended under the hull, which could be linearly moved back and forth. There was no stabilizing tail on it either.

To summarize, we can say that the LZ-1 turned out to be too heavy, the sliding weight that controlled the pitch of the device often jammed, and the airship itself suffered from poor controllability due to the lack of tails on it. In addition to the shortcomings of the general design of the airship, there was another problem - unreliable engines, one of which failed during flight
.


Daimler water-cooled engine with 14,2 hp. pp., installed on the Zeppelin LZ-1 airship. Source: mercedes-benz-publicarchive.com

But although the first three flights of the LZ-1 were not successful in themselves and did not make a positive impression on military observers, the basic technological concept of Count von Zeppelin - a long and rigid metal frame with individual gas cylinders covered with fabric - was reasonable, and it formed the basis for all future zeppelin airships.

Zeppelin LZ-2


Having failed and hit the first bumps with the LZ-1, Zeppelin decides to improve his first model. But since at that time most people were not interested in air navigation and were not ready to invest their money in the Count's experimental machines, he mortgaged his family jewels and family estate. For five long years, Zeppelin worked tirelessly to make people believe in his project - he personally traveled almost the entire country, trying to convey that this enterprise was so colossal in its capabilities and importance for Germany and the world that it should be substantially supported.


Zeppelin LZ-2

However, Ferdinand von Zeppelin still had the support of the King of Württemberg and several former business partners who provided him with funds, including the company's founder Daimler Motor Company Gottlieb Daimler, and Carl Berg, also an aeronaut and company owner Lüdenscheid - a pioneer of the aluminum industry, who saw great prospects for themselves in this new industry. Thus, having received serious support, in 1905 the 67-year-old count managed to begin construction of the second rigid-hull airship - LZ-2.


Zeppelin LZ-2 airship on Lake Constance, 1905

Note. Carl Berg (1851–1906) was an entrepreneur and airship builder who was one of the first to realize the advantages of the new metal, aluminum, as a lightweight building material, and the company he created, Lüdenscheid, became the leading aluminum production company in Germany.

Before the advent of duralumin (a durable alloy containing copper, magnesium and manganese), Carl Berg's company developed and supplied aluminum for all Zeppelin airships. Having first seen the metal at the World's Fair in Paris in 1889, Berg immediately recognized its business potential and became the main "responsible" for the introduction of aluminum into the German economy in the 1890s.
.


Karl Berg (1851–1906) – Germany's aluminum king

Zeppelin completed work on the new airship design in the fall of that year, working continuously day and night, making important changes to the original design, strengthening and at the same time lightening its structure, significantly increasing the efficiency of the steering apparatus.


Airship Zeppelin LZ-2

Although Count Zeppelin's second airship was an improvement over the LZ-1, it still did not include basic design elements that were later recognized as important to the device's stability and controllability in flight, such as vertical and horizontal tails. But nevertheless, the LZ-2 did represent a significant technical advance, largely thanks to the doctor of technical sciences engineer Ludwig Duerr.


Interior view of the LZ-2 airship, showing construction of the rigid frame. Gas cylinders are not yet inflated

The weak tubular rigid structures previously used on the LZ-1 were replaced by a triangular profile, which provided a dramatic increase in rigidity and strength of the entire structure. These triangular profiles would now be used on every subsequent Zeppelin airship, and Ludwig Duerr would remain chief engineer, designing every ship Zeppelin built after LZ-2.


Two women watch the flight of the LZ-2 airship. Source: Smithsonian Institution

Note. Ludwig Dürr was the chief designer of all the airships built by Zeppelin, with the exception of the very first airship LZ-1, which he also helped build. Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin appointed Dürr as his chief designer when the first
Count engineer Hugo Kubler, who designed the rigid LZ-1, refused to fly on the airship he himself created.

After Zeppelin was forced to dismantle its first ship and cease operations due to lack of funds in 1900, Dürr was the only employee who continued to work for Zeppelin, remaining with Zeppelin until 1945. In addition to his work as a designer, Dürr also trained as an airship pilot and later commanded the LZ-5, LZ-6 and LZ-7 Deutschland Zeppelins. Died in January 1956
.


Dr. Ludwig Duerr, Chief Engineer at Zeppelin

LZ-2 made its only flight on January 17, 1906. At an altitude of 427 meters, the airship encountered strong winds, the engines failed, and the crew had to make an emergency landing near the town of Kisslegg, near the border with Austria, in the Allgäu mountains. While they were repairing the engines, a strong wind hit the airship, and it was so badly damaged that Count Zeppelin, with a heavy heart, was forced to order its dismantling.


Dismantling of the airship LZ-2

This accident caused a storm of newspaper coverage around the world, but it was not due to a structural defect or poor design of the airship. Zeppelin subsequently explained that he could have survived the storm in the air if his engines had worked. But be that as it may, this time LZ-2 was still a success, and the government decided to give Zeppelin half a million marks for the further continuation of its work.

Note. LZ-2 (Luftschiff Zeppelin-2) had a length of 126,19 meters, a diameter of 11,75 meters, and the volume of spherical cylinders was 10 cubic meters. On this airship, Zeppelin replaced the 370 hp engines. s., used on the LZ-14, to new Daimler piston engines with a power of 1 hp. With. (85 kW), which gave the LZ-62,5 sufficient speed for maneuvering. The maximum speed was 2 kilometers per hour. The airship was designed to rise to 40 meters and carry a payload of 850 tons.

Zeppelin LZ-3



Zeppelin LZ-3

But everyone thought that the count’s dream was completely shattered, and he suffered another failure, but Zeppelin this time did not agree with public opinion, and already in April of the following year in Friedrichshafen he launched his third airship, having invested his entire your enthusiasm and latest resources.

The new airship that was built was exactly the same as the one that was destroyed in the Allgäu mountains, with the exception of the stabilizers at the stern, which were a biplane horizontal tail with three rudders on each side, designed to provide the necessary pitch control and stability. And it became the first truly practical airship built by the Count!


Airship LZ 3 accompanied by a boat with members of the Reichstag on Lake Constance

Each LZ-3 flight lasted several hours, and the first flights with this airship were an immediate success. Zeppelin flew it over Lake Constance, making wide circles and maneuvering under his complete control, which is remarkable given its size. The airship also showed excellent speed, reaching 40 kilometers per hour.

Not only that, but the LZ-3 also demonstrated certain improvements in range and payload, resulting in longer, and most importantly, reliable flights, including a brilliant 1907 flight of eight hours over 350 kilometers!


Arrival of the airship LZ-3 at the Oberwiesenfeld airfield in Bavaria

The success of this airship brought Zeppelin and his team their first public recognition, after which the German government offered the inventor a new floating hangar, much larger than the old one, which would allow him to improve his experiments.


Crown Prince Wilhelm zu Besuch with Count Zeppelin in Friedrichshafen. 1908

The LZ-3 was later purchased by the German army and was used until 1913. But before being purchased by the army, the airship made many flights and carried a number of famous and influential passengers, including the Crown Prince of Germany.


Prince Egon of Fürstenberg and Kaiser Wilhelm II inspecting the airship at Donaueschingen Castle

Government Interest and Zeppelin LZ-4


After this, government officials announced their readiness to purchase Count Zeppelin's airships if they met certain requirements, the main of which was round-the-clock flight with a range of at least 700 km, and early next summer the Zeppelin company demonstrated another new model of the airship - LZ-4, several larger in size than its other predecessors, with a total volume of seventeen cylinders containing about 15 cubic meters of hydrogen.


LZ-4 leaves its floating hangar on Lake Constance for a 24-hour test flight

This increased size gave her a carrying capacity of 17 kilograms, which with the increased power of the new Daimler engine (each engine is rated at approximately 000 horsepower) made her a practical, lifting and fast vessel.


The Prince of Wales inspects a Zeppelin on a visit to Germany. Circa 1910–1913

Count Zeppelin, with an eye to the passenger and military capabilities of the new airship, also built an observation deck into the top of the bow, intended for observing the stars for navigational purposes, which marked the beginning of improvements in design and convenience that would continue continuously.


Kaiser Wilhelm II and German airship designer Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin at Tegel Airfield in Berlin, August 29, 1909

Note. During the test flight, the airship flew all the way to Zurich, Switzerland, and then returned back to Lake Constance, covering a distance of 386 km, reaching an altitude of just under 800 meters. This flight attracted many curious people - large crowds gathered along the route to witness the flight of the airship, which flew over German and Swiss cities.

On August 5, 1908, during another test, LZ-4 made an emergency landing in a field near the city of Echterdingen, but a sudden storm tore the airship from its temporary parking lot and it collided with a nearby tree, as a result of which some gas cylinders were damaged and it was completely burned out after a hydrogen explosion. The cause of the fire was later identified as a static charge that arose when the rubberized wool of gas cylinders ruptured.

This disaster occurred in front of approximately 40 to 50 thousand curious spectators and caused an incredible wave of support for Zeppelin's work in the public. Donations from the public poured in, and within 24 hours enough funds had been received to restore the airship, eventually totaling more than 6 million marks, providing Zeppelin with a solid financial base for his further experiments.
.


Wreckage of LZ-4 in Echterdingen

Warm financial and political support of the German public and government after the Echterdingen crash allowed the Count to found the Luftschiffbau Zeppelin company in September 1908, where Zeppelin's son-in-law Alfred Kolsman was invited as the company's business manager, and in 1909 the famous German journalist Hugo Eckener, who wrote extensively about airships Zeppelin, joins the company as director of public relations.


Count Zeppelin, Dr. Ekener and Captain Strasser (chief of the naval aviation). On the occasion of the Count's last visit to the airship harbor in Nordholz

Soon Kolsman founded DELAG, Deutsche Luftschiffahrts-Aktiengesellschaft (German Airship Transport Corporation) as a subsidiary of the Zeppelin Company to commercialize Zeppelin travel by providing passenger services.


Alfred Kolsman, General Manager of Deutsche Luftschiffahrts-Aktiengesellschaft

After such successes, the airship industry in Germany takes the lead and begins to develop at a rapid pace, and besides, it also gives direction for the development of the aluminum industry! More and more new developments of the count found their application not only for military purposes, they were also used for transporting goods and transporting people.

Zeppelins in World War I



A Zeppelin flies over Kiel harbor during maneuvers during the First World War.

The German army and navy saw great potential in airships not only for long-range reconnaissance - flying over the enemy’s defense line far beyond the range of artillery fire, they could also carry out bombing attacks on the enemy’s rear. By the beginning of the First World War, the Kaiser's army had the largest and most powerful fleet of combat airships, each of which could reach speeds of about 130 km/h and carry up to two tons of bombs, and since the Western Front was firmly entrenched in the trenches and found itself in a military stalemate, they decided to use them against the rear of Britain - its cities and towns.


Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin and Kaiser Wilhelm II

Note. Sausage skins, made from animal intestines, served as ideal gas bags for zeppelins. The intestine became so important to the German war effort that sausage production was banned in Germany for a time.

Raids on Britain. Until the twentieth century, the civilian population of the British Isles practically did not suffer from wars, since previous wars almost did not touch the shores of Britain, but the outbreak of the World War was to change everything. The first predatory raid of German airships took place in January 1915 on the seaside towns of Norfolk - Great Yarmouth and King's Lynn.

This air raid was the first in which the victims were not military personnel, but civilians going about their daily lives. As a result of this raid, morale among British civilians fell due to the risk of further bombing and fears that a German invasion might soon follow.


German Zeppelin over a British city

After this raid the German Kölnische Zeitung in her editorial she wrote with delight:

“Our zeppelins have raised the fiery right hand over Britain. Haughty England trembles, awaiting new irresistible blows with horror. The most perfect weapon, created by the genius of German engineers, the airship is capable of hitting our enemy in the very heart. An eye for an eye, blood for blood. This is the fastest way to end the war victoriously, and therefore the most humane.”


British sailors observe a German reconnaissance airship in the sky above the sea

After the first successful bombings on Britain, new raids followed. On May 31, 1915, an airship attacked the capital of the British Empire - London, as a result of which five people were killed and thirty-five were injured, and on the night of April 2-3, 1916, Edinburgh, Scotland was attacked by two zeppelins.

At first, the Zeppelins seemed invincible, suddenly attacking objects at will and without suffering any losses. Protection against them seemed inadequate, the helplessness of air defense caused panic and fear, and morale among the population fell every time - people were terrified of these sudden raids.


German Zeppelin over London

As these raids show, British defenses were completely inadequate to the threat posed by airships, but by 1916 a number of air defense measures had been introduced on the island - fighter aircraft were directed against them, and many guns and searchlights were deployed. British defense also learned to pick up their radio messages and warn the population of their approach, and to organize the fight against airships, a special central communications headquarters was created, coordinating the work of fighter aircraft, artillery and warning the population.


Acoustic locator. It remained in approximately the same form until the beginning of World War II.

Over time, it became clear that the Zeppelins were extremely vulnerable to explosive shells that ignited the hydrogen in the tanks, the Germans began to suffer losses, and airship raids were canceled in 1917, when 77 of the available 115 German Zeppelins were shot down or completely disabled .

Thus, by the end of the war, more than 1 British citizens had been killed in air raids.


Unexploded bomb dropped on Edinburgh in 1916

Note. At first, British air defenses were largely unable to counter the aerial threat posed by Zeppelins, which flew too high for the fighters of the day to reach and shoot down.

But the Zeppelins had one very serious vulnerability - the flammable hydrogen cylinders used for lifting. Ordinary bullets fired from a fighter's weapon could, of course, penetrate gas cylinders, but something else was required to cause the Zeppelin to catch fire. With the invention of the Buckingham incendiary bullet, which not only pierced gas cylinders but also ignited hydrogen, the threat of Zeppelins over the British Isles was virtually completely neutralized.



British aviator William Leaf Robinson was the first man to shoot down a German airship over England when it attacked the city on 3 September 1916

So, during the war, as a result of 52 airship raids on Britain, more than 1 people were killed and about two thousand people were injured. Throughout 500 and 1915, airship raids became a common feature of island life. Of the 1916 available Zeppelins used by the German Army, 115 were lost and 53 were damaged beyond repair.

Raids on Paris. From the very beginning of the First World War, the center of the French capital was subject to raids by German aircraft. The first such recorded air attack occurred on 13 October 1914, when two Taube monoplanes dropped bombs in the heart of Paris, causing little damage. But by the end of 1915, the bombing intensified - the Germans began using giant Zeppelins for raids, and on March 20, 1915, two of these Zeppelins dropped bombs weighing 2 kg on the center of Paris, targeting commercial areas.


French police pose with an unexploded bomb dropped by a German airship

But due to poor navigation equipment, the zeppelins often missed their targets, and their raids resulted in relatively little destruction, causing civilian casualties. This was the case on January 29, 1916, when an air attack by a Zeppelin bombed a densely populated and poor area of ​​Paris, killing 23 people and injuring 30.


Bomb crater on Rue Drouot in Paris after a German airship raid

The funeral took place on February 7, 1916, with thousands of mourners lining the streets of Paris as six artillery carriages carried the coffins to the Notre-Dame de la Croix church, with politicians and other dignitaries following behind. The funeral service was conducted by Cardinal Léon Adolphe Hamette (1850–1920) and the Archbishop of Paris, who gave what one British newspaper called a “moving speech”:

“Before you lie the victims of German barbarism, who did not fall on the battlefield!”

In 1917, the Germans replaced the Zeppelins with the more lethal Gotha G. IV fighters.


Crater created by one of the bombs dropped by a Zeppelin on Paris

Flight to Africa. In November 1917, the Zeppelin L-59 was sent to German East Africa (today's Namibia) with medical supplies and ammunition for the German colonial forces besieged there. The Zeppelin L-59 was specially prepared for a long flight - all unnecessary equipment, such as bomb releasers, and weapons were removed from it, and all available space was allocated for cargo.

The new L-59 was longer than all the others, which made room for two additional gas tanks, containing 68 cubic meters of hydrogen, and it could easily carry almost 000 tons of payload. Having only five engines on board, this zeppelin reached an average speed of about 50 km/h!


The Zeppelin L-59 is a naval airship that flew a still unbroken world record non-stop flight of 4 miles from Yambol in Bulgaria to west of Khartoum in Africa and back to Yambol, transporting 225 tons of cargo in 14 hours.

Flying from Germany to the city of Yambol, in the south of Germany's ally Bulgaria, the L-59 was loaded with 9 tons of ammunition for machine guns, 5 tons of medicine and 21 tons of gasoline for engines.


The desk of telegraph operators and navigators (left) and the control stand for the rudder and high-altitude navigation instruments (right)

L-59 sailed from Yambol (southeast Bulgaria) at 9 a.m., crossing northwest Asia Minor, then the Aegean Sea, south of the city of Smyrna (now Izmir), between the islands of Crete and Rhodes and across the Mediterranean Sea by dawn the next day reached the African coast.

And already crossing the Sahara, the military headquarters in Berlin contacted the L-59 by radio and informed the crew that the German colonial troops in German East Africa had surrendered to the British, and the zeppelin, which had covered about 3 kilometers without stopping, turned back, flying high over the Sahara , Asia Minor and the Black Sea, arrived back in the Bulgarian Yambol in less than four days from the moment he left that country, and there was still enough fuel on board for two to three days of flight!

Thus, in November 1917, the still unbroken world record of flying 4 miles non-stop from Yambol in Bulgaria to west of Khartoum in Africa and back to Yambol and transporting 225 tons of cargo in 14 hours was accomplished.

Death of the Count


In February 1917, in good health despite his 78 years, Zeppelin traveled to Berlin to attend an aviation exhibition and during the flight he contracted pneumonia, after which he developed appendicitis, which he was successfully operated on, but later developed pneumonia, and he died in Berlin on March 8 before the end of the First World War.


Count's funeral...

Although the count was already mortally ill and old, he still held meetings, lying on the bed in his hospital room, conveying to like-minded people his great dream of transporting goods and passengers on airships, and after his death they continued the work that he left them.

The Count was buried in Stuttgart in the Pragfriedhof cemetery next to his wife Isabella, and airships flying over his grave dropped garlands and wreaths of flowers on his resting place. And although the First World War was still raging, the people considered Zeppelin their national hero and gave him a state funeral with all due honors.


Count's funeral...

On his tombstone, very modest compared to many other tombstones in this cemetery, are written the words of Jesus: Dein Glaube Hat dir Geholfen (“Your faith has saved you”).


A modest tombstone at the Pragfriedhof cemetery in Stuttgart

The Count's Legacy


As already mentioned, Count Zeppelin died in 1917, before the end of the First World War, so he did not witness the temporary closure of the Zeppelin project due to the Treaty of Versailles, nor the second revival of Zeppelin under his successor Hugo Eckener, who made the first in 1929 V stories circumnavigation of the world by airship.


The commander of the famous airship "Graf Zeppelin" Hugo Eckener, who participated in most of its record flights, including the first flight around the world

Note. Dr. Hugo Eckener (1868–1954) was an engineer, commander of the rigid airship LZ-127 "Graf Zeppelin" and manager of the Luftschiffbau Zeppelin company after the death of Count von Zeppelin. The Treaty of Versailles prohibited Germany from building the large Atlantic-crossing airships it wanted to build, so the doctor began lobbying the US and German governments to allow the company to build a zeppelin for the US Navy as part of German war reparations. It was under this theme that the company built the LZ-126, later renamed the USS Los Angeles, which became the oldest rigid airship in service with the US Navy.

The next airship they built was the LZ-127 Graf Zeppelin, which became the most successful rigid airship in the history of airship construction. Ekener was at the helm of the airship on most of its record-breaking flights, including the first intercontinental flight of a passenger airship in 1928, a flight around the world in 1929 and a flight to the Arctic in 1931.



The airship LZ-126, built by Hugo Ecker, later renamed USS Los Angeles, which became the oldest rigid airship in service with the US Navy

In 1915, when the First World War was already underway, Ferdinand von Zeppelin created a new technology company ZF Friedrichshafen (original name Zahnradfabrik), whose precision-made gears and transmissions promised optimal power transfer between the engines and propellers of all Zeppelin airships.

Today, ZF Friedrichshafen AG is the largest mechanical engineering company to emerge from the Zeppelin heritage, widely known for its research and development in the automotive industry, including production technologies such as transmissions and vehicle chassis. Today, the legacy of Count Zeppelin - the company ZF Friedrichshafen AG - has more than one hundred and sixty production facilities in more than thirty countries around the world.

The unfinished aircraft carrier Graf Zeppelin during World War II and two rigid airships were named after Ferdinand von Zeppelin: the LZ-127 Graf Zeppelin, which circled the world, and the LZ-130 Graf Zeppelin II, a copy of the Hindenburg airship, the explosion of which in 1937 marked the demise of airships, after which the government banned passenger transport.


LZ-127 "Graf Zeppelin", which flew around the world in 1929

British rock band Led Zeppelin's name also comes from his airship, and his granddaughter Countess Eva von Zeppelin even threatened to sue them for illegally using their surname during a performance in Copenhagen.

In 1975, Ferdinand von Zeppelin was inducted into the International Air and Space Hall of Fame in San Diego.

Prominent personalities of the time, including Claude Dornier*, Karl Maybach, Count Alfred von Soden-Fraunhofen (from 1921 to 1944, member of the board and technical director of the company) and Alfred Kolsman and Hugo Eckener, already mentioned above, came to Friedrichshafen to work with Zeppelin. It was thanks to Zeppelin that the city of Friedrichshafen on Lake Constance became an important center of technology.

New birth


The first thoughts about whether it would be economically and technically feasible to revive airship travel date back to 1988, when major technological leaps in lightweight metal structures, shell materials, propulsion systems and new control technologies occurred, proving that the new technology of airship travel in terms of technical and economic standards, and most importantly, safety standards, is not comparable to the original technology that existed from the very beginning of the creation of airships.

Note. It will soon be exactly 90 years since the giant airship LZ-129 Hindenburg exploded into a fireball over Lakehurst Air Force Base, New Jersey, on May 6, 1937, killing 36 people who had just completed a leisurely flight across the Atlantic. And although the world has since experienced many much larger aviation disasters, the Hindenburg forever became synonymous with disaster in the public consciousness and brought an abrupt end to the era of the airship.


The airship LZ-129 "Hindenburg", which crashed in 1937 in New Jersey

Today's company ZLT ​​Zeppelin Through its owners, Luftschiffbau Zeppelin GmbH and ZF Friedrichshafen AG, it has direct origins in a company founded more than a century ago by aeronautics enthusiast Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin (1838–1917) to design and manufacture airships. It was here in Friedrichshafen that the idea of ​​Zeppelin was born and it was here that the first Zeppelin LZ-1 was created, and it is the seat of modern technology and the starting point for the creation of airships and other technology companies related to metal structures.

And now, after more than six decades have passed (if you count from the date of the disaster of the airship LZ-129 "Hindenburg"), the German Federal Agency issues a certificate for a new and modern airship of the type Zeppelin NT, and after a feasibility study, research and development, on September 18, 1997, the Zeppelin NT finally took off for its maiden flight from an anchor mast in front of the exhibition center in Friedrichshafen. And in August 2001, Zeppelin NT began commercial flights!


The Zeppelin NT airship is a direct successor to the first airships of Ferdinand von Zeppelin

Note. Zeppelin NT (NT – Neue Technologi, German for “new technology”) airships, like the first Zeppelins, have a rigid internal structure made of modern composite materials and aluminum (which reduced the overall weight by 50 percent compared to previous rigid ones). airships), using an innovative propeller drive concept with vector thrust and a fly-by-wire flight control system, which significantly expands the application limits of previous airships.

And to control the airship, only two people are required. The Zeppelin NT class airships are 75 meters long, 14 meters in diameter and 19,5 meters wide. They reach a maximum speed of 125 km/h and can fly non-stop over a distance of 900 km. The Zeppelin NT can carry 12 passengers plus 2 crew or 1 kg of cargo and can take off and land vertically. The NT airship uses non-flammable helium as lifting gas. Since 900, the Zeppelin NT has been in mass production.



Passenger cabin of Zeppelin NT. Photo: ZLT Zeppelin Luftschifftechnik GmbH

Zeppelin NT is used for recreational tours, as observation platforms for photographers and television commentators covering major events, and for research missions for environmental observations, troposphere studies and natural resource exploration.

Information


*Cunard China. The first screw steamship built and owned by the British company Cunard Steamship Line Shipping Company, which carried out regular mail services across the Atlantic.

*Frame. A transverse structural element of an aircraft, made in the form of a profile in the shape of a circle or oval and providing rigidity to the cross section of the fuselage. Frames can be normal or reinforced. The latter serve to take on large loads and place on them attachment points for other structures to the fuselage.

*Stringer. A longitudinal structural element of an aircraft, which consists of extruded profiles rigidly connected to the fuselage frames. Together with the frames, it makes up the strength structure of the fuselage.

*Pitch. The angle of inclination of an aircraft at which its longitudinal axis changes its direction relative to the horizontal plane. Pitch determines the position of the aircraft in space, affects the lift of the wing and, together with yaw and roll, refers to one of the three Euler angles.

*Claude Dornier (1884–1969). Having joined the Luftschiffbau Zeppelin company in 1910, he worked in the experimental department of F. Zeppelin's airship-building enterprise. Dornier was researching the aerodynamics of an all-metal rigid airship. Soon he designed an airship for transatlantic routes. This impressed Count von Zeppelin, and in 1914, Count Zeppelin created a subsidiary company, Zeppelin Werke Lindau GmbH, in Friedrichshafen specifically to design aircraft based on Dornier’s original ideas.

Sources:
1. Zeppelin Museum (zeppelin-museum.de).
2. Roman Koster. Zeppelin, Carl Berg, and the Development of Aluminum Alloys for German Aviation (1890–1930).
3. Materials of Russian and foreign newspapers and technical magazines.
83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    16 February 2024 05: 52
    On September 18, 1997, the Zeppelin NT finally took off for its maiden flight from an anchor mast in front of the exhibition center in Friedrichshafen. And in August 2001, Zeppelin NT began commercial flights!
    Wow, even to this day it is possible to find any real practical application for such a technology that seemed already outdated. True, a careful and comprehensive economic justification is needed; it is possible that similar types of equipment can still be found in economically justified applications somewhere.
    1. +6
      16 February 2024 06: 39
      Quote: venaya
      Wow, even to this day it is possible to find at least some application for such a technology that seemed already outdated, real practical application

      Unfortunately, apart from sightseeing tours and video filming, practical applications for airships have not yet been found. They are produced in many countries, including here. Perhaps in the future when fight against carbon footprint will reach its peak, they will pay closer attention...
      1. +3
        16 February 2024 06: 49
        Quote: Luminman
        Unfortunately, apart from sightseeing tours and video filming, practical applications for airships have not yet been found.
        I have different information: To detect low-flying targets, radars must be located at a significant altitude, while the use of aircraft is not profitable due to high fuel consumption, and they still do not fly as long as we would like. The use of airships for such purposes significantly reduces costs in these cases. Many, many more options for economically justified use of devices of this type are possible, you just need to take a closer look around, I think that there are similar examples of e.g. There are a lot of reasonable applications that can be found.
        1. +5
          16 February 2024 07: 00
          Quote: venaya
          To detect low-flying targets, radars must be located at a significant altitude

          The Americans in Iraq used airships to maintain stable communications as repeaters. We in the Ministry of Defense are hatching some plans to use them, but there is very little information on these matters. I also had a chance to read about unmanned airships, but in my opinion they are still only in the project...

          Quote: venaya
          Many, many more options for economically justified use of devices of this type are possible.

          In the 2000s, there was a lot of talk about the use of airships on drilling rigs, but in what capacity it is not clear. They also talked about the benefits of airships in the development of the Northern Sea Route, but this too is just talk. I know that transportation by airships is cheaper, and the airships themselves, with the advent of new composite materials and electric power plants, are beginning to play with new colors... It also seems to me that the use of airships is still economically profitable...
          1. +3
            16 February 2024 07: 24
            Quote: Luminman
            We in the Ministry of Defense are hatching some plans to use them, but there is very little information on these matters. I also had a chance to read about unmanned airships, but in my opinion they are still only in the project...
            Even today I have no idea of ​​using airships for military purposes, apparently and invisibly. The catch here is that today they are more of a purely military direction and are quite relevant right now, but of course I don’t risk publishing them in the open press - that’s the main problem! As for civilian use: it makes sense and is possible to look for possible applications, but this is also a whole topic...
            Quote: Luminman
            I’ve read about unmanned airships, but in my opinion they are still only in the draft...
            I personally see little use of unmanned airships, but they are not only the future, but also a dramatic reduction in the cost of tasks performed. I remember that my father said that even in the Second World War, airships were mostly uncrewed and only some of them had armed air defense gunners. And today we have carried out a colossal sabotage of entire strategic areas of industry and it turned out to be an almost complete failure in relation to drones that are so relevant now. Just a disaster!
            1. +4
              16 February 2024 07: 56
              Quote: venaya
              Even today I have ideas about using airships for military purposes, apparently, invisibly

              Yes, there are a ton of ideas, but for some reason there are no orders from interested parties. To build them, you need to buy them. There is everything for building airships - the necessary materials, safe inert helium, power plants for every taste, including variable vector control systems, modern avionics and much, much more. Alas, there are only no customers...

              Quote: venaya
              I personally see little use for unmanned airships

              Well why? Weather reconnaissance, aerial photography, mobile communication repeaters, traffic surveillance, in modern war conditions they can also be an airspace scanner for drones, probably something else. Such devices can hang in the air for days. Why do such machines need pilots?
              1. +5
                16 February 2024 08: 26
                Quote: Luminman

                Quote: venaya
                I personally don't see much use for it myself. not unmanned airships

                Well, why?
                It seems that I didn’t express myself very clearly here, it is precisely the unmanned samples of such lighter-than-air aircraft that have the greatest economic indicators, and by the way, I write about this everywhere.
          2. +2
            16 February 2024 10: 36
            Quote: Luminman
            In the 2000s, there was a lot of talk about the use of airships on drilling rigs, but in what capacity it is not clear.

            Yes, there can only be one “quality” - drillers need a vehicle capable of transporting a drilling rig without disassembling and reassembling, and off-road capability. Discussions about airships in relation to the transfer of drilling rigs have been going on, EMNIP, since the beginning of the development of Siberian fields.
            1. +2
              16 February 2024 11: 08
              Quote: Alexey RA
              drillers need transport capable of moving the rig without disassembling and assembling

              Probably so. I've never seen live drilling rig...
              1. +4
                16 February 2024 15: 59
                Quote: Luminman
                Probably so. I've never seen a drilling rig in real life...

                If there is a hard surface, the process of transporting the assembled tower looks something like this:

                And this is on a flat surface. In a typical towing diagram, several more tractors were shown next to the caravan, insuring the tower from falling with the help of cables attached to the top of the tower.
                1. +1
                  16 February 2024 16: 01
                  Quote: Alexey RA
                  The process of transporting the assembled tower looks something like this

                  Touching ... wink
                  1. +2
                    16 February 2024 16: 05
                    Quote: Luminman
                    Touching ... wink

                    Yeah... now let’s imagine that there is tundra around the tower, and this is happening in the summer. laughing
                    So the drillers would sell their souls for the opportunity to pick up this pyramid and move it in one piece to another site.
                    1. +1
                      16 February 2024 16: 12
                      Quote: Alexey RA
                      So the drillers would sell their souls for the opportunity to pick up this pyramid

                      Yes, this is a real all-terrain vehicle for difficult terrain. Can also be used in the Saudi desert. The only trouble is that no one needs it...
    2. +9
      16 February 2024 07: 49
      Quote: venaya
      True, a careful and comprehensive economic justification is needed; it is possible that similar types of equipment can still be found in economically feasible applications somewhere.

      Yes Easy! For example, in our North, where cargo is delivered to remote fields either by winter roads or by helicopters, including MI-26, can you imagine how much delivery costs? Or the same Chukotka, supplied via the Northern Sea Route for navigation. For example, Bilibino, for example, carries potatoes/cabbage/carrots by plane from Magadan! Google how much they cost there!
      Airships, with their cost of cargo delivery, have a huge niche in our country!
      The problem is different - the absence of those who would promote this topic at the appropriate level and the presence of lobbyists for today's transport schemes who do not want to lose their piece of the pie...
      1. +4
        16 February 2024 08: 00
        Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
        For example, in our North, where cargo is delivered to remote fields either by winter roads or by helicopters

        This topic has been discussed, as I remember, since the mid-90s of the last century. But things are still there...
        1. +5
          16 February 2024 08: 06
          Quote: Luminman
          This topic has been discussed, as I remember, since the mid-90s of the last century. But things are still there...

          I described the reasons above. I remember a long time ago I was doing a topographical survey of a settlement for gasification, and there a small-town bourgeois who had a business selling fuel briquettes to the local population, a monopolist on the local heating market))), was very much against this gasification. I thought it would even come down to assault on my team laughing
          1. +3
            16 February 2024 08: 10
            Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
            I described the reasons above

            Yes, that's right. Transportation companies can do their best to interfere with the development of airships. Even insert sticks at the level of the Kremlin or State Duma, having their own lobbyists there. And now, after the division of Aeroflot, there are not enough fingers to count them...
      2. +2
        16 February 2024 08: 21
        Quote from: AllX_VahhaB
        The problem is different - the absence of those who would promote this topic at the appropriate level and the presence of lobbyists for today's transport schemes..
        And why, in this case, do we need private entrepreneurs? Russia is a huge country filled with innumerable natural resources, and off-road transport is completely undeveloped. Airships alone for transport purposes in our conditions will clearly not be enough; it is also necessary to develop other areas, especially those that provide a quick economic effect and can additionally have dual-use transport functions. We remember the Second World War, the Leningrad Siege, the “Road of Life” - they are still lifted from the bottom like GAZ-AA cars and even railway tanks. The same thing is still practiced in Siberia on winter roads along rivers, heavily loaded transport vehicles end up under water, there are many videos about this. But all that is required here is to retrofit trucks for river winter roads with the simplest and even the cheapest additional waterproof floats, by the way this belongs to the category of dual-use devices because on such heavy vehicles equipped with additional. Mono buoyancy volumes without difficulty and without large extras. costs to transport huge flows of cargo even across rivers. Similar developments were previously carried out in the interests of the Ministry of Defense, but somehow now all this has been surprisingly forgotten... I’m already silent here about super-economical tiltrotors for transport purposes...
        1. +5
          16 February 2024 08: 39
          Quote: venaya
          I’m already silent here about super-economical tiltrotors for transport purposes

          Tiltrotor planes are just uneconomical - they will leave any business without pants... wink
          1. +3
            16 February 2024 08: 58
            Quote: Luminman
            Tiltrotor planes are just uneconomical - they will leave any business without pants...
            Are helicopters and even airplanes really able to compete with convertiplanes in terms of efficiency? It is my deep conviction that a helicopter or an airplane is nothing more than an unfinished tiltrotor, that is, a heavier-than-air apparatus that does not provide both economical takeoff/landing and economical flight over an economically justified distance. In terms of efficiency, it can be inferior only to airships, but not always and not in all cases. The same scheme - a vehicle that is sufficiently unfamiliar causes initial rejection due to its complete unknown. For this reason, the airship and tiltrotor, due to their novelty, cause unreasonable fears.
            1. +6
              16 February 2024 09: 06
              Quote: venaya
              Are helicopters and even airplanes really able to compete with convertiplanes in terms of efficiency?

              Here everything is just the opposite - a tiltrotor simply cannot compete with either an airplane or a helicopter...

              Quote: venaya
              In my deep conviction that a helicopter or a plane is nothing more than an unfinished tiltrotor

              And here, too, it’s the other way around - this tiltrotor is something unfinished... wink

              Quote: venaya
              a vehicle that is sufficiently unfamiliar causes initial rejection due to its complete unknown

              This vehicle is very well known for its frequent accidents and disasters. And what causes rejection is not its complete obscurity, but the high accident rate, complexity of the design and high fuel consumption...
              1. +4
                16 February 2024 09: 25
                Quote: Luminman
                Here everything is just the opposite - a tiltrotor simply cannot compete with either an airplane or a helicopter...
                Entertaining... and very interesting.
                Quote: Luminman
                And here, too, it’s the other way around - this tiltrotor is something unfinished...
                Oh really ???
                Quote: Luminman
                Quote: venaya
                Are helicopters and even airplanes really able to compete with convertiplanes in terms of efficiency?

                Here everything is just the opposite - a tiltrotor simply cannot compete with either an airplane or a helicopter...

                Quote: venaya
                In my deep conviction that a helicopter or a plane is nothing more than an unfinished tiltrotor

                And here, too, it’s the other way around - this tiltrotor is something unfinished... wink

                Quote: venaya
                a vehicle that is sufficiently unfamiliar causes initial rejection due to its complete unknown

                This vehicle is very well known for its frequent accidents and disasters. And what causes rejection is not its complete obscurity, but the high accident rate, the complexity of the design and high fuel consumption...
                High fuel consumption? This is something completely new, the first time I’ve heard this. Very “well known” - this is about the “Bell V-22 Osprey” then yes, a well-known garbage dump. It’s high time to get it out of your head first and foremost. This is not the first time I have heard anti-advertising for extremely promising samples of both technology and much more. But we won’t accept thousands of other samples of highly economical tiltrotors for consideration, or what? This whole topic is both endless and very, very chatty. In this regard, I remember both the collapse of the Union and many other similar examples, the topic is complex and I am not able to discuss it here due to its large volume, although it is very, very interesting to me, better next time, on other branches specialized on this topic .
                1. +3
                  16 February 2024 13: 40
                  Quote: venaya
                  But we won’t accept thousands of other samples of highly economical tiltrotors for consideration, or what?

                  Thousands of other tiltrotor samples are basically nothing from Bell V-22 Osprey no different except in design, size and color of seat upholstery...
    3. +4
      16 February 2024 08: 56
      Quote: venaya
      It is true that a careful and comprehensive economic justification is needed

      Cheap transportation of goods, that’s the whole economic justification. Before WWI, the Germans successfully transported mail and cargo. You need a desire, but it’s not there yet
      1. +2
        16 February 2024 09: 08
        Quote: Dutchman Michel
        Cheap transportation of goods, that’s the whole economic justification.
        Who, how and in what way is able to authoritatively convey this cheapness in the transportation of goods to organizations corresponding in status and capabilities: ministries, banks, etc., etc. In my practice, such a case has already happened; I managed to organize within the country a whole branch of the ultra-pure materials industry, but then the country had no other choice and the issue was resolved as quickly as possible. The case when at that time the rooster just pecked at the right time, under normal conditions it practically turns out that it is not possible, although it is a very, very pity!
  2. +6
    16 February 2024 06: 06
    Quote: N. Kuntsev
    Sausage skins made from animal intestines served as ideal gas bags for zeppelins

    I read a long time ago that there were even policemen on duty at meat-packing plants, who made sure that the skin of a slaughtered animal did not go somewhere to the left. Will the theme of airships continue? A big plus for the article and the author!
    1. +5
      16 February 2024 06: 50
      Quote: Dutchman Michel
      so that the skin of a slaughtered animal does not go somewhere to the left

      I couldn’t find an article I had previously read about the serious scientific work done by scientists at one of the chemical companies in Germany during WWII on the replacement of skins used for gas cylinders with artificial materials and on the competition of aluminum with duralumin. The article seemed to fall through the ground...

      Quote: Dutchman Michel
      Will the theme of airships continue?

      I would like to write about the airship LZ-127 Graf Zeppelinwho flew around the world. There was a lot of intrigue and contacts with Stalin, but interest somehow faded away. Maybe later...
      1. +5
        16 February 2024 08: 43
        Quote: Luminman
        I would like to write about the airship LZ-127 Graf Zeppelin

        Think about it, I can provide a lot of information from our and foreign sources. This topic interests me too. Drop me a line
  3. +14
    16 February 2024 07: 39
    Fighter aircraft were sent against them, and many guns and searchlights were deployed.
    A couple of years will pass, and airplanes will become the main weapon in the fight against airships, but at the beginning of the war the most fantastic methods were invented to repel attacks. Here, for example, is what the St. Petersburg newspaper “Russian Invalid” wrote in November 1914:
    “A French inventor named Guerre came up with a special kind of arrow, the main target of which would be airships. This arrow consists of a strong steel needle. With its rod it enters a cylindrical tank filled with 0,2 liters of gasoline. Six small hooks catch the arrow when it hits an object made of cloth or the like. When the arrow hits the target, it simultaneously enters the cylinder and strikes the primer, which ignites the gasoline. Small steel wings at the rear end of the boom provide stability in flight. Experiments made from the height of the Eiffel Tower are said to have been very successful.”
    And the first battle between an airplane and a Zeppelin took place on June 7, 1915. A German LZ-37 was attacked by Second Lieutenant Warneford. The British pilot was able to lift his Morane-Saulnier LA over the zeppelin and drop six nine-kilogram bombs onto the giant airship. A giant (158 meters long) engulfed in flames crashed to the ground near the Belgian city of Ghent. The pilot's merits were awarded the Order of the British Empire. More details here https://starcom68.livejournal.com/800923.html
    Thanks to the author for an interesting topic!
    1. +8
      16 February 2024 08: 03
      Quote: Destiny
      And the first battle between an airplane and a Zeppelin took place on June 7, 1915. A German LZ-37 was attacked by Second Lieutenant Warneford

      Probably the airship was hanging at a low altitude, because at that time such a height to which airships could climb was still inaccessible to fighters...
    2. +8
      16 February 2024 08: 49
      Quote: Destiny
      A German LZ-37 was attacked by Second Lieutenant Warneford

      There's a very vague story there. It is believed that the airship received the main damage from ground guns. Warneford merely completed the matter. This is during the battle in Belgium wink
  4. +6
    16 February 2024 07: 40
    They flew to London, but couldn’t reach Petrograd!
    1. +6
      16 February 2024 08: 04
      Quote: hohol95
      They flew to London, but couldn’t reach Petrograd!

      Of the cities of the Russian Empire, only Warsaw was bombed. I forgot to mention this...
      1. +3
        16 February 2024 10: 33
        There were at least TWO attempts to fly to Petrograd.
        And both ended in failure due to weather conditions.
        I don’t remember the source of the information.
        I read an article in some magazine.
        1. +3
          16 February 2024 11: 23
          Quote: hohol95
          There were at least TWO attempts to fly to Petrograd

          I was interested in this a lot, but apart from one or two sentences that they did not reach St. Petersburg, I found nothing. That's why I didn't mention it...
          1. +2
            16 February 2024 11: 38
            "Tehrika-Youth"
            Or
            "Wonders and Adventures"
            In one of these magazines I could read an article about attempts to fly to Petrograd on airships.
          2. +1
            20 February 2024 09: 17
            It was enough to read the books Airships at War or History of Aeronautics, author V.A. Obukhovich, it is written about this in detail..
            1. +1
              20 February 2024 16: 16
              Quote: Oldman
              Airships at war or the history of aeronautics, author Obukhovich V.A.

              It's strange that I didn't get it...
  5. +8
    16 February 2024 08: 17
    Yes, sometimes great people with brilliant ideas are born, it’s a pity that this is becoming less and less common.
  6. +5
    16 February 2024 08: 22
    Many thanks to the Author, a very interesting and informative review, wonderfully illustrated.

    The ban on sausage production is a completely new fact for me.

    IMHO, the author may not have presented this paragraph very well.

    "...during the Siege of Paris during the Franco-Prussian War of 1870–1871, he tested the military use of balloons to transport mail and people from Paris, which was under siege by the Germans."

    The count himself was a German, it is unlikely that he helped the Parisians in any way; he probably observed and studied the enemy’s use of balls.
    1. +5
      16 February 2024 08: 34
      Quote: S.Z.
      The count himself was a German, it is unlikely that he helped the Parisians in any way; he probably observed and studied the enemy’s use of balls.

      Perhaps these were German spies entrenched in Paris, or perhaps they were taking out sick people or foreign diplomats who had nothing to do with this war - the laws of chivalry were still preserved. I also puzzled over this, but all the information on the siege of Paris speaks precisely about this...
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. +4
    16 February 2024 09: 58
    Respect to the author, the site has not been spoiling readers with such articles lately.
    The airship LZ-129 "Hindenburg", which crashed in 1937 in New Jersey

    Newsreel of the disaster.
    1. +4
      16 February 2024 11: 21
      Quote: Dekabrist
      The airship LZ-129 "Hindenburg" crashed

      Also an entertaining story in which almost everyone is blamed, from aliens to Jews who blew it up in retaliation for the Nuremberg Laws...
  9. +4
    16 February 2024 10: 44
    The new design features lifting gas cylinders made from cow intestines,

    I was interested in this moment. Information found in the tenth volume of the second edition of the German technical encyclopedia Lexikon der gesamten Technik, article Luftschiff (http://www.zeno.org/Lueger-1904/A/Luftschiff).
    It turns out that they used not just cow intestines, but the outer layer of the cecum - Goldschlägerhaut. Its thickness is only 0,05 - 0,1 mm. Initially, the shell consisted of seven layers of such material glued together, then two or three layers of material were glued onto a base of cotton or silk fabric and covered with varnish.
    Since the cow's cecum is only about 70 cm long, the material was extremely scarce and technology had to be developed that would allow the use of other parts of the intestine.
    1. +3
      16 February 2024 11: 18
      Quote: Dekabrist
      Information found in the tenth volume of the second edition of the German technical encyclopedia

      I didn’t come across this article, probably the request was wrong. GoldbeaterHaut - this is from the professional jargon of German butchers and sausage makers, for a complete technological picture I had to look there...

      Quote: Dekabrist
      Since the cecum of a cow is only about 70 cm long, the material was extremely scarce

      Many sources claim that for one airship it was required from two hundred to three hundred thousand cows! At first I thought it was some kind of typo, but other, alternative, sources stated the same thing. Expensive weapon, however... wink
      1. +2
        16 February 2024 21: 01
        “Many sources claim that one airship required two hundred to three hundred thousand cows!”
        I tried to collect and read books from the 30s about airships. How many succeeded? It's like a mini-library.
        There they described the process in paint, and even with illustrations - how a lot of women in large rooms separated this film - invigorating - with dull knives in water, and how they then obtained large panels from it, glued with water onto the fabric in several layers.
  10. 0
    16 February 2024 12: 17
    In my opinion, exploring the vast expanses of Siberia and the Far North is simply impossible without airships.
  11. +3
    16 February 2024 12: 32
    The project of an unmanned airship-drone carrier (aeromatka) is currently being developed by a group of enthusiastic engineers in the Russian Federation. We are talking about the project of a thermally ballasted multifunctional hybrid airship (aeroplatform) Aerosmen.
    Here is a video on youtube - https://youtu.be/AcMwUYnkNB0
    Such airship-air platforms have enormous prospects for the Russian armed forces and for the civilian sector, of course, too.
    1. +1
      16 February 2024 13: 33
      Quote: aerocrat
      is currently being developed by a group of enthusiastic engineers in the Russian Federation

      Do we need to understand that no funding from the state is expected? Is it all pure enthusiasm?
      1. +1
        16 February 2024 20: 49
        “You have to understand that no funding from the state is expected? Is everything just pure enthusiasm?”

        And it's not necessary. This project contains many interesting "highlights" - but overall it is unpromising. Something like the regularly offered “wunderwaffles”.
        If you dig into the details of the history of this development, you will find a lot of interesting things.
        Since this is a weapons site, I’ll remember Kurchevsky’s recoilless rifle. Especially as it applies to aviation.
        Is very similar.
        The recoilless guns themselves have a certain niche, they found it and are still used today, although not to say very widely. Grenade launchers, something for specific conditions.

        So it is here. There may be some kind of niche for this hybrid device, but it’s very narrow.
  12. +1
    16 February 2024 14: 09
    So it was only after his retirement from the army in 1890, at the age of 52, that Zeppelin was able to devote himself more fully to the problems of lighter-than-air flight, and 10 years later he would build his first airship, the Luftschiff Zeppelin 1 (LZ-1).
    An example of how you shouldn’t be tied to age. Passionarity has its own duration for everyone, and for many it is completely absent.
    1. +3
      16 February 2024 16: 16
      Quote: Stirbjorn
      Passionarity has its own duration for everyone

      And for some, it even reaches the gravestone, although Gumilyov argued that it, passionarity, has the form of a sinusoid...
  13. +3
    16 February 2024 14: 28
    "In November 1917, the Zeppelin L-59 was sent to German East Africa (today's Namibia) with medical supplies and ammunition for the German colonial forces besieged there."

    This is not today's Namibia, but Tanzania. Wonderful article!
    1. +3
      16 February 2024 16: 09
      Quote: vserge
      This is not today's Namibia, but Tanzania

      Unforgivable mistake! Of course, Tanzania with Burundi and Rwanda!
  14. +2
    16 February 2024 16: 31
    I had a chance to analyze airships a little, their features and comparisons with airplanes.
    Published on Zen. All the advantages of airships are at low speeds, comparable to the speed of the wind.
    1. +2
      16 February 2024 16: 35
      Quote: Vladimir-TTT
      All the advantages of airships - at low speeds comparable to the speed of the wind

      According to the literature, then modern airships no wind threatens... Will you give me a link to Zene?
    2. +2
      16 February 2024 16: 37
      Links to articles
      https://dzen.ru/a/YBq5s1cfeQayRosa
      https://dzen.ru/a/YBz02KS2d2efDxbn
      https://dzen.ru/a/YCgnoDMct2NSE6JQ
      1. +2
        16 February 2024 16: 40
        Subscribed. I'll read it later...
  15. +3
    16 February 2024 16: 45
    Quote: Luminman
    If you believe the literature, then modern airships are not threatened by any wind...

    No. Physics and its branch of aerodynamics have not changed. Moreover, the aerodynamics of low speeds. On which, in fact, airships fly.
    All sorts of projects of “discoplanes”, “thermoplanes” and other flying saucers are nothing more than an attempt to take originality.
    If you are interested, you can “take apart” any of these projects for which there is at least a minimum of information - if you have time, of course.
    1. +1
      16 February 2024 19: 48
      Quote: Vladimir-TTT
      Physics and its branch of aerodynamics have not changed. Moreover, the aerodynamics of low speeds

      I will answer you in the words of F. Zeppelin himself - the forces of nature cannot be eliminated, but they can be balanced against each other
      1. +1
        16 February 2024 20: 33
        A man holds a weight. Wastes energy, gets tired - but no benefit. And the forces are balanced.
  16. +5
    16 February 2024 17: 42
    Quote: Luminman
    Yes, this is a real all-terrain vehicle for difficult terrain. Can also be used in the Saudi desert. The only trouble is that no one needs it...

    Actually not quite like that. Or - not at all.
    The airship flies from one airship port to another - all the infrastructure is there.
    What does it look like?
    An airship on a mooring mast or in a hangar. Balanced.
    Receives cargo. How much cargo was accepted - so much ballast was given away.
    Took off, flew. Not high (a mandatory requirement, otherwise the carrier gas will be released later) and not fast.
    Arrived at the place - for example, at the mooring mast.
    They unload the cargo and take on ballast. The most convenient way is water - poured into ballast tanks.
    What if it’s on an unprepared site?
    Landed. Unload? How? Dropped a ton of cargo - take on a ton of ballast. And if you haven’t taken the ballast, release 1000 m3 of expensive carrier gas. Even hydrogen is expensive, let alone helium in general.
    And he landed somewhere in the tundra, where there was only permafrost and moss.
    Someone will say - you need a hybrid - propellers that create lift.
    But here we get a device that successfully combines the disadvantages of a classic airship and a helicopter - slow like an airship, and expensive like a helicopter.
    1. +1
      16 February 2024 18: 08
      Quote: Vladimir-TTT
      And if you haven’t taken the ballast, release 1000 m3 of expensive carrier gas

      You can control the height of the airship not only by releasing gas, but also by changing its volume or adjusting the temperature
      Quote: Vladimir-TTT
      you need a hybrid - propellers that create lift. But here we get a device that successfully combines the disadvantages of a classic airship and a helicopter

      An engine that changes the thrust vector will cope with this task perfectly. It will be slow, but also economical
      1. +2
        16 February 2024 18: 24
        You can control the height of the airship not only by releasing gas, but also by changing its volume or adjusting the temperature

        You can't change the volume that easily. There are projects and attempts to simulate this, but real results are far from achieved. And the efficiency is not very good - pumping 1000 m3 (ton of carrying capacity) into 100 m3 - the compressor has decent power and a long operating time - it consumes a lot of fuel.
        With heating - about the same. Warm the atmosphere - because the heat exchange is significant.
        An engine that changes the thrust vector will cope with this task perfectly. It will be slow, but also economical

        No. It will be slow and uneconomical. Since for efficiency you need a much larger propeller than a helicopter - everything depends on the mass and speed of the air thrown down - the higher the speed, the greater the losses.
    2. +1
      16 February 2024 20: 02
      Quote: Vladimir-TTT
      What if it’s on an unprepared site?
      Landed. Unload? How? Dropped a ton of cargo - take on a ton of ballast. And if you haven’t taken the ballast, release 1000 m3 of expensive carrier gas

      It looks like you are confusing an airship with a hot air balloon. You have already been answered in the thread below that you can control the ballast of an airship not only by bleeding gas from the cylinders, but also by regulating its volume. You can also adjust the temperature and reverse (sorry for such a word - I came up with it myself) power plant and propellers. Once again I will repeat the quote from the hero of this article - the forces of nature cannot be eliminated, but they can be balanced against each other...

      Quote: Vladimir-TTT
      Someone will say - you need a hybrid - propellers that create lift. But here we get a device that successfully combines the disadvantages of a classic airship and a helicopter - slow like an airship, and expensive like a helicopter

      This time you are again confusing the airship with a stillborn tiltrotor, which slow as an airship and expensive as a helicopter.
      1. +1
        16 February 2024 20: 29
        “It seems that you are confusing an airship with a balloon. You have already been answered in the thread below that you can control the ballast of an airship not only by bleeding gas from the cylinders, but also by adjusting its volume.”
        It is forbidden. With today's level of technology and materials. And besides, it’s energy-consuming - pumping gas into cylinders means very high fuel consumption.
        "You can also regulate the temperature and reverse (sorry for that word - I came up with it myself) the power plant and propellers. Once again I will repeat the quote from the hero of this article - the forces of nature cannot be eliminated, but they can be balanced against each other..."
        It is possible to balance. The force of resistance - sweet traction. But with a headwind, everything is balanced, the engines are running, fuel is being wasted, but no one is flying anywhere. Or even “tail first”.
        You can regulate the temperature and change the thrust vector - but this does not solve the problem.
        About the temperature - take an interest in the fuel consumption of balloons and their payload - and they have very little heat exchange with the environment - the speed is zero.
        The thrust vector - from the very first more or less flying airships - "dynamic lift" was used - both positive and negative - and so on in all.
        A variable vector is more convenient and more expanded - although on the last large airships (N-blimps) they abandoned it, they used simple dynamic force, including for takeoff and landing. Somewhere I have links to descriptions of these latest flights of large airships.
        1. +1
          16 February 2024 21: 13
          Quote: Vladimir-TTT
          It is possible to balance. The force of resistance - sweet traction. But with a headwind, everything is balanced, the engines are running, fuel is wasted, but no one is flying anywhere. Or even “tail first”

          The force of resistance is perfectly balanced by the force of traction. Well, I can also remind you of the caravels, which, thanks to their sails, could sail against the wind. Airships do not have sails, but they do have stabilizers and rudders - take a close look at its design...

          Quote: Vladimir-TTT
          You can regulate the temperature and change the thrust vector - but this does not solve the problem.

          Could be so. Or you can simply change the thrust vector...
          1. +1
            17 February 2024 06: 00
            And what? what are stabilizers and rudders? You finish your thought.
            About the thrust vector.
            The Hindenburg, with its mass of 200 tons and a payload of about half that, has an engine thrust of about 6 tf.
            But even if you omit this, you have changed the thrust vector, lifted the airship upward on the engines. What then? hang like that until the wind takes you somewhere?
            Turn the thrust vector to the horizon - the airship will fly forward and down...
  17. +3
    16 February 2024 17: 48
    Quote: Dutchman Michel
    Cheap transportation of goods, that’s the whole economic justification. Before WWI, the Germans successfully transported mail and cargo. You need a desire, but it’s not there yet

    It is not that simple. And most importantly, it’s not cheap at all. If we compare, without emotions, with transportation by other modes of transport, by the same planes. Already at a speed of just over 100 km/h, the airship is inferior in fuel efficiency to an airplane. Taking into account the cost of the carrier gas (and it is lost, despite all today's materials), everything is even worse.
    1. +1
      16 February 2024 17: 58
      Quote: Vladimir-TTT
      If we compare, without emotions, with transportation by other modes of transport, by the same planes. Already at a speed of just over 100 km/h, the airship is inferior in fuel efficiency to an airplane

      Given its dimensions this is understandable. But for short distances and for large-sized cargo, in my opinion, it’s just the thing!
  18. +1
    16 February 2024 18: 13
    Quote: Dutchman Michel
    Given its dimensions this is understandable. But for short distances and for large-sized cargo, in my opinion, it’s just the thing!

    It's not easy either. For loading - drain ballast of equal mass, like this large cargo. To unload, dial in ballast equal to the load. And in between work, you need a boathouse for storage. In our country this is almost impossible. For megacities with expensive land, human settlements, gasters and other delights - and between them - a dying Russia. And during storage, the carrier gas is lost... and much more.
    1. +1
      16 February 2024 18: 17
      Quote: Vladimir-TTT
      For loading - drain ballast of equal weight

      I already told you that you can control the height of the airship and control its ballast not only by releasing gas, but also by changing its volume or adjusting the temperature, as well as by adjusting the thrust vector and propeller pitch
      1. +1
        16 February 2024 18: 31
        I already told you that you can control the height of the airship and control its ballast not only by releasing gas, but also by changing its volume or adjusting the temperature, as well as by adjusting the thrust vector and propeller pitch

        If it were so simple, they would have used it a long time ago.
        Variable thrust vectoring is also on the aircraft carriers Akron and Macon, but this does not cancel out the ballast. As an addition, it works, and everything is “tailored” to constant mass - on the same aircraft carriers there were moisture condensers from exhaust gases - so that during fuel production the carrier gas would not be released.
        Volume - do not change. Or rather, it is possible - but deep in theory.
        Temperature is also not a solution.
        1. +1
          16 February 2024 20: 05
          Quote: Vladimir-TTT
          If it were so simple, they would have used it long ago

          It's actually simple. Well, or almost simple. And they apply it. But they don’t use it en masse only because there are no mass orders...
          1. +1
            16 February 2024 20: 31
            “It’s actually simple. Well, or almost simple. And they apply it.”
            Give an example.
            Or at least a description/justification of how to do it. With a couple of figures of calculations.
            1. +1
              16 February 2024 21: 17
              Quote: Vladimir-TTT
              Give an example

              Imagine an airplane. The lifting force is provided by the wing profile. For airships, this very force is provided by a set of gas cylinders enclosed in a shell. Everything else is like on an airplane. With some features...
              1. +1
                17 February 2024 05: 53
                So this is all that airships had and still have - that same dynamic force.
  19. +1
    16 February 2024 22: 00
    When will the material (carbon?) be made strong and light enough to make a vacuum airship? Greater lifting force will make it possible to reduce the size, which, together with modern engines, can provide sane handling. Plus, a vacuum (regular, not deep) is inexpensive and does not burn.
    1. +1
      17 February 2024 06: 07
      It will not reduce the size. Even if you take a fairly clean vacuum, the gain compared to helium is at the level of 10%. But the mass of the body will be added. Both power and weight for pumping. Vacuum pumps are monsters. The largest vacuum chambers of our time are just toys compared to airships.
      Compare - large vacuum chambers - 1000 m3, and an airship 100 m000 (Graf Zeppelin), 3 m200 (Hindenburg) and even Norway and its clones 000 m3.
      1. 0
        17 February 2024 11: 49
        Quote: Vladimir-TTT
        Even if you take a fairly clean vacuum, the gain compared to helium is at the level of 10%.
        Why? The weight of a cubic meter of air under normal conditions is 1292 grams, helium - 357 grams, hydrogen - 90, vacuum is not ideal, so let's take not 0, but 1 (with a margin). How can I get 10% difference?
        Quote: Vladimir-TTT
        Vacuum pumps are monsters. The largest vacuum chambers of our time are just toys compared to airships.
        Compare - large vacuum chambers - 1000 m3, and an airship 100 m000 (Graf Zeppelin), 3 m200 (Hindenburg) and even Norway and its clones 000 m3.
        There will simply be several chambers: large main ones - pumped out by ground means and sealed, small shunting ones - by means of an airship.
  20. +1
    17 February 2024 12: 37
    Quote: bk0010
    Why? The weight of a cubic meter of air under normal conditions is 1292 grams, helium - 357 grams, hydrogen - 90, vacuum is not ideal, so let's take not 0, but 1 (with a margin). How can I get 10% difference?

    Helium is twice as dense as hydrogen - approximately 180 g/m3. 10% of 1250 g/m3 - 125 g/m3.
    That's why))
  21. +1
    17 February 2024 12: 54
    Quote: bk0010
    There will simply be several chambers: large main ones - pumped out by ground means and sealed, small shunting ones - by means of an airship.

    This improves the situation a little - but not much.
    A vacuum pump is always heavier than a compressor of equal mass capacity.
    And the weight of compressors and their energy consumption do not allow them to be used on helium airships for pumping helium from cylinders (shells) where it is a carrier gas, into high-strength cylinders, where it ceases to be a carrier gas and becomes ballast.
    There are projects, but not yet very useful:
    "How it works
    The Aeroscraft airship uses a buoyancy control system called COSH (Control of Static Gravity), similar to the ballast system of submarines. Thanks to COHS, runways and airfield commands can be eliminated. Buoyancy. In the first model designed for commercial use, the Eros machine will have 18 gel canisters (1). To increase lift, the pilot releases helium from these tanks. The gas, much lighter than air, flows into the space under the outer skin (2), which forms the bulk of the aircraft's volume (the cargo compartment is not shown here). As a result, increased pressure is created around the four large air reservoirs (3) located on the sides. The reservoirs are compressed, and a significant part of the air is pushed into the outboard space. The overall specific gravity of the apparatus decreases, and the ship floats to the surface. In order to reset the altitude, the pilot performs the same steps in reverse order. Three powerful compressors (not shown in the picture) pump helium from the common internal space into the storage cylinders. Inside the outer skin, the pressure decreases slightly, and the air tanks begin to swell, sucking in heavier air from the outside space. The ship begins to descend (air movement is facilitated by fans and valves). In flight, the contours of the aircraft, which have a wing profile, generate additional lift."

    Here's a diagram for this.
  22. +1
    18 February 2024 06: 59
    By the way. Sometime in the fall, around November, I observed something like a tethered balloon in the vicinity of Kursk. It’s hard to say more precisely - it was far away.