Remington rifle: design could not be simpler

45
Remington rifle: design could not be simpler
Portrait of Eliphalet Remington from 1845 by an unknown artist. Cowen Auction


"He shot once, and he shot twice,
and a bullet whistled into the bushes...
You shoot like a soldier, - Kamal said,
“Show me how you drive.”
Rudyard Kipling "The Ballad of West and East".
Translation by E. Polonskaya

History rifles. The creation of rifle cartridges with a metal sleeve immediately prompted designers to create a combat weapon for them. weapon. Moreover, in the same USA at that time there was a Civil War between the northern and southern states, and the warring parties needed a lot of weapons. And it was precisely at this very time that “the simplest rifle in the world” appeared, firing metal cartridges. And it was created by an American company owned by Eliphalet Remington.



The future famous gunsmith was born on October 28, 1793, and died on August 12, 1861. Like many other Americans, he was lucky to be born into a family of emigrants from England. As a child, he helped his father, and having become a blacksmith, by the age of 23 he had become such a good craftsman that he was able to make a rifle, for which he forged the barrel himself. True, he still installed a store-bought mechanism on it, purchased from a passing merchant.

The rifle was a success, the technology for its manufacture was worked out by him, so he decided to open his own enterprise for the manufacture of such rifles. I decided and did it. And he named his enterprise very simply: “E. Remington and Son."

The company was registered in the city of Illion, New York, in 1825, after which the father and son worked in it for 19 years, and then they also took their nephew into the business - Philo Remington. Then the children, Samuel and Eliphalet the Third, also got into the family business.

The company expanded and was therefore renamed E. Remington and Sons,” after which it existed under that name until 1888, when management of the company passed to the grandchildren of the company’s founder, Graham and Hartley Remington. The new owners felt that Remington Arms Company sounded much more reputable than the previous name, and changed it for the third time. It still exists under this name today, although it produces not only weapons.

She managed to become famous thanks to her 1863 revolver, which turned out to be so good that it was able to compete with Colt’s own revolvers. Moreover, it was adopted by the American army and was used in the Civil War.

At that time, it was fashionable to produce revolver carbines on the basis of a successful revolver. The Remington company was no exception, but almost simultaneously with revolving carbines, it produced its world masterpiece - a cavalry carbine with a crane bolt or, as they say in English-speaking countries, a “rolling block” bolt.


The .577 (14,7 mm) Snyder cartridge (1867), the .577 Martini-Henry cartridge (1871), and the .577/450 Martini-Henry cartridge. Contemporary photography

It is interesting that, as often happened in the history of weapons, it was invented by a complete stranger who had nothing to do with the company: Leonard Geiger. Moreover, Geiger not only, as it turned out, never worked for the Remington family, but never even met any of them.

But the company's employee was another person: Joseph Ryder. And so he designed his shutter almost simultaneously with Geiger. Ryder received his patent on November 15, 1864, and Geiger on April 17, 1866.

And then this is what happened: the Remington company did not sue for violation of the patent rights of its employee and engage in petty litigation, but simply bought Geiger’s patent. This made the two Geiger brothers rich, but now everyone began to call the shutter designed by Leonard Geiger “Remington”!


The bolt of a Remington rifle. The shutter is closed, the trigger is pulled. Author's photo


The bolt of a Remington rifle. The hammer is cocked, the bolt is folded back. Author's photo


The bolt of a Remington rifle. The bolt is closed, meaning the rifle can be loaded and the hammer cocked. Now all that remains is to press the trigger to fire the shot. Author's photo

Remington also released a rifle, the design of which was based on Ryder’s patent, and called the “Old Model Carbine.” In March 1864, the federal government ordered 1 carbines of this type in .000 (46 mm) caliber chambered for the rimfire cartridge.

In December, the order was increased to 5 copies, with the first 000 carbines manufactured in February 1, more than 250 in March, and the entire order was completed on April 1865, 1.

In October 1864, the company signed a second contract for 15 “second model” carbines firing the .000 caliber (50 mm) Spencer cartridge, also with rimfire. The first 12,7 enlisted in the army in September 1, five months after the end of hostilities.

Well, all the remaining 14 carbines were made by March 000; it turned out that the army did not need them and were transferred to warehouses. But they still had a chance to shoot: in November 1866, the entire supply of the army was bought by Remington and then sold to France, where they were used during the Franco-Prussian War!


An 1867 Remington rifle produced by the Carl Gustav arms factory in Sweden. Army Museum, Stockholm

It is interesting that General Custer also used the Remington Sporting carbine in the fatal battle with the Indians at Little Big Horn in 1876. And he (although he fought there, being with the rank of colonel), most likely, could afford to purchase any weapon. However, he chose large-caliber and completely unpatriotic Bulldog revolvers and ... a Remington carbine, apparently considering it better than the standard Springfield army carbine!


Model 1870 Remington carbine, manufactured by Husqvarna, Sweden. Army Museum, Stockholm

Well, now let's look at this technique itself in metal. After all, before us, absolutely indisputably, is the most ingenious rifle bolt of all times in its simplicity, both in its completeness and reliability.

After all, the shutter has only three main parts, two axles and four springs, not counting the screws. The main parts of everything are the bolt and trigger. Both are large in size and therefore durable, spinning on massive axles so they are as hard to break as a metal ball! The released trigger fits into the middle groove in the bolt and is integral with it.


The bolt of a Remington rifle, which was in service with the Vatican's Papal Guard. Manufactured by Nagan. Fastening of the shutter axes using one screwed plate. To disassemble the bolt, it was necessary to first remove this plate, and then easily knock out the axles and remove both the bolt and the trigger. Photography by Alain Dobress

The shutter worked like this.

In order to fire, you had to pull the trigger back with your thumb. Then the U-shaped bolt with finger grooves on the protrusions on the right and left had to be pulled back. Now the cartridge had to be inserted into the chamber and pressed with the bolt, which was spring-loaded from below with a special spring. Now you could aim and pull the trigger. He entered the bolt and firmly propped it up so that no recoil could throw them back. Well, the trigger itself also hit the rim of the cartridge.

After the shot, all this was done in reverse order. At the same time, the extractor pushed out the empty cartridge case, and... the rifle could be loaded again.

From 1867 to 1896, Remington produced a huge number of rifles and carbines chambered for black powder cartridges. For example, in 1869, 125 rifles of this system were supplied to Turkey alone.


In this photo you can see the following parts of the Remington rifle: the extractor (on the barrel below left), the grooved bolt “spoke” (right) and the same grooved trigger “spoke” (below). The breech is open and a cartridge can be inserted into it. Photography by Alain Dobress

When the central firing cartridge designed by Berdan was born, the company had to remake its bolt to accommodate it. But it all came down to an essentially minor change: a channel for the striker appeared in the bolt. On the right side they made a curved plate (“spoke”) to move it back. And these were all the changes! Now the trigger, hitting the firing pin, as before, firmly locked it in the “dead center”.

And although in 1896 many countries had already switched to multi-shot rifles, Remington still produced its “single-shot” rifles, albeit chambered for smokeless powder, and sold the same number of them around the world. Which, by the way, was facilitated by their multi-caliber nature, that is, they were produced for a wide variety of cartridges: 6 mm (.236 Remington caliber), 7 mm (Mauser cartridges for Spain and Brazil; 7,62 mm (.30 US caliber) and 7,65 mm (Belgium, Argentina, Chile and Colombia).

Why did they attract buyers?

First of all, because of its cheapness - only 15 dollars, including a bayonet. And, of course, they were attracted by its high combat characteristics. For example, the barrel length was 30 inches, although the rifle itself was shorter than many others, and it weighed only about 4 kg with a bayonet. And its rate of fire was higher than that of many repeating rifles, reaching up to 15 rounds per minute.


The barrel of a Remington rifle made by Nagan, on which the mark of the Papal Guard is visible. Photography by Alain Dobress

The target firing range was 900 meters, although some rifles had sights set to 1 meters. It was very convenient to disassemble and clean the rifle, and the barrel could be cleaned on both sides! So it is not at all surprising that the papal guard in the Vatican made Remingtons their service weapon!

But this rifle had a very serious flaw, because of which it eventually left the arena of military weapons.

It was impossible to equip it with a magazine by any means, namely repeating rifles at the turn of the 19th–20th centuries. became the dominant weapon in all armies. But before that happened, there had to be reliable bolt action rifles too!
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    18 February 2024 04: 52
    The future famous gunsmith was born on October 28, 1793, and died on August 12, 1861

    I thought this was where the article would end laughing drinks good
    Z, s, Vyacheslav, well, I couldn’t restrain myself hi drinks
    1. -3
      18 February 2024 05: 04
      It is impossible to remain indifferent to the respected Author!
  2. +3
    18 February 2024 05: 00
    15 rounds per minute - you have to be a big trickster to reload so quickly. But overall, a cool weapon! Simple and reliable
  3. -3
    18 February 2024 05: 02
    Ochepyatka....
    It is interesting that, as often happened in the history of weapons, it was invented by a complete strangerOM

    Vyacheslav, if you press through control+e, will mistakes come to you? what
    1. -1
      18 February 2024 07: 01
      Quote from Enceladus
      If you squeeze through control + e, will mistakes come to you?

      To be honest, I didn’t understand the point of the comment.
      1. 0
        18 February 2024 07: 04
        I am for the fact that there was no ending.
        Noticed an error
        Select the text and press Ctrl + Enter

        I mean that it goes to the moderators or the author of the article recourse
        1. +4
          18 February 2024 07: 38
          This goes to the moderators. Once an article is published, the editor himself cannot change it.
          1. 0
            18 February 2024 09: 37
            Ctrl+Enter - both authors and editors can click.
      2. +3
        18 February 2024 13: 55
        Hi, Vyacheslav! smile
        You're talking about rifles, and I, as always, use short barrels from the same Remington. It would be strange if he didn't make a pistol with the same lock.
        Here are photos of several pistols from 1865 onwards.
        1. +3
          18 February 2024 14: 00
          And further...))
          The last photo is the M-1871 Rolling Block Rifle, decades later considered one of the most accurate. Remington Rolling Block rifles are successfully used by athletes and hunters even today.
  4. +2
    18 February 2024 05: 55
    A rifle, by definition, has barrel rifling. Therefore, there are big doubts that in 1816, 23-year-old Remington was able to create it, and even forge the barrel with his own hands.
    1. +7
      18 February 2024 06: 57
      Quote: Prokop_Svinin
      that in 1816, 23-year-old Remington was able to create it, and even forge the barrel with his own hands.

      Rifled weapons were made already in the 16th century. The barrel forging technology has been honed to perfection. Why couldn't he? Is this surprising? Another thing is surprising: how the Dayaks drill a completely straight tube in a wooden trunk 1 m 80 cm long. This weapon is called sarbakan or sumpitan. The barrel is straight, the hole is perfectly straight. Otherwise, the force of the blown air will not be enough to fire the shot. The ant climbed inside - the shot was already disrupted. It's slowing down! But if you don’t climb... 30 m and on target!
      1. +6
        18 February 2024 07: 40
        Quote: kalibr
        Quote: Prokop_Svinin
        that in 1816, 23-year-old Remington was able to create it, and even forge the barrel with his own hands.

        Rifled weapons were made already in the 16th century. The barrel forging technology has been honed to perfection. Why couldn't he? Is this surprising? Another thing is surprising: how the Dayaks drill a completely straight tube in a wooden trunk 1 m 80 cm long. This weapon is called sarbakan or sumpitan. The barrel is straight, the hole is perfectly straight. Otherwise, the force of the blown air will not be enough to fire the shot. The ant climbed inside - the shot was already disrupted. It's slowing down! But if you don’t climb... 30 m and on target!

        Two... were marked as minuses. What did they not like about this answer? Can you write clearly? Or are these just another “fighters with Shpakovsky”?
        1. +3
          18 February 2024 17: 28
          Quote: kalibr
          Two... were marked as minuses. What did they not like about this answer?

          Alas! “Minus players” cannot be understood by logic! You can post information that is “absolutely” accurate, verified 10 times... but these “minusers” will still be downvotes! Write at least that 2x2=4 - there will still be disadvantages! I suspect that in such cases the reason is some kind of psycho-disorder of this “category” of minus people or the natural “petty nastiness” of them! Although...is there a difference between a minor mental disorder and “minor” dirty tricks? request Still, I think that you shouldn’t give up on minuses... but you might want to think about authorizing minus players!
      2. +6
        18 February 2024 08: 34
        Quote: kalibr
        The barrel forging technology has been honed to perfection. Why couldn't he?

        Obviously, my colleague does not understand how the village blacksmith was able to cut the trunk?
        By the way, me too. You really need a specific tool...
        And forge it, yes. I can't say it's easy, but it's possible.
        1. +3
          18 February 2024 08: 35
          Quote: Senior Sailor
          You really need a specific tool...

          Bought and cut...
          1. +4
            18 February 2024 08: 58
            Quote: kalibr
            Bought

            Steam powered lathe?
            1. +2
              18 February 2024 09: 42
              Quote: Senior Sailor
              Quote: kalibr
              Bought

              Steam powered lathe?

              In the 17th century it was cut by hand.
              1. +4
                18 February 2024 09: 50
                Quote: kalibr
                In the 17th century it was cut by hand.

                So the requirements for the trunks were different request
                But most likely yes. I bought a set of mandrels with which I practiced the Kama Sutra for a long time and persistently
                1. +2
                  18 February 2024 13: 09
                  Quote: Senior Sailor
                  But most likely yes. I bought a set of mandrels with which I practiced the Kama Sutra for a long time and persistently

                  The formation of rifling using a mandrel (broaching) dates back to the beginning of the 20th century, and before that, the rifling was “cut” using a trellis cutter.
        2. +4
          18 February 2024 10: 09
          Obviously, my colleague does not understand how the village blacksmith was able to cut the trunk?
          Me, by the way, too.

          Americans value their history, so this question is easy to find out by opening, for example, a publication on the website of The American Society of Arms Collectors, which is called “Remington—The Early Years” (https://americansocietyofarmscollectors.org/wp-content/uploads/2022 /04/2006-B94-Remington-The-Early-Years.pdf).
          There is even a drawing there, the caption under which reads:
          In 1816, young Eliphalet Remington fabricated his first rifle barrel and took it to a gunsmith in Utica to have it assembled into his first flintlock rifle. Thus began the story of Remington firearms.
          In 1816, young Eliphalet Remington made his first rifle barrel and took it to a gunsmith in Utica to be assembled into his first flintlock rifle. Thus began the history of Remington firearms.
          That is, the first Remington rifle was made by a gunsmith from Utah; Remington provided him only with a blank barrel, which he cut. By the way, there are also two versions of the barrel - according to the first, he bought it, and according to the second, he forged it himself.
          1. +6
            18 February 2024 10: 26
            Quote: Dekabrist
            That is, the first Remington rifle was made by a gunsmith from Utah; Remington provided him only with a blank barrel, which he cut.

            This is a more plausible version!
            1. +7
              18 February 2024 10: 56
              Steam powered lathe?

              Everything is much simpler - with a manual one. In the photo there is a machine for cutting trunks and a milling cutter. The machines are made according to drawings from the book "The Gunmaker and the Gunstocker" by PN Sprengel, Berlin, 1771.
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. The comment was deleted.
        5. +1
          18 February 2024 13: 02
          Quote: Senior Sailor
          Obviously, my colleague does not understand how the village blacksmith was able to cut the trunk?
          By the way, me too. You really need a specific tool...
          And forge it, yes. Can't say it's easy, but it's possible

          For some reason I can’t insert a direct link to YouTube request But you can go
          https://youtube.com/watch?v=X_O1-chxAdk&si=Whk4Z59ENjIrIV8q там документальный фильм 1969 г про то как в условиях кузницы делали винтовки.
    2. +2
      18 February 2024 07: 02
      Why? Kentucky rifles, also known as Pennsylvania rifles, had been produced in the future United States since the first half of the 18th century, so the technology was quite known and accessible.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +2
      18 February 2024 09: 57
      Quote: Prokop_Svinin
      A rifle, by definition, has barrel rifling. Therefore, there are big doubts that in 1816, 23-year-old Remington was able to create it, and even forge the barrel with his own hands.

      Quote: Prokop_Svinin
      A rifle, by definition, has barrel rifling. Therefore, there are big doubts that in 1816, 23-year-old Remington was able to create it, and even forge the barrel with his own hands.
      A good documentary about the production of firearms in a forge. This includes forging, drilling and threading of the barrel.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. The comment was deleted.
  5. 0
    18 February 2024 07: 02
    For its time, the rifle was really good and therefore was in demand, as evidenced by the contracts concluded for its production.
  6. +2
    18 February 2024 07: 15
    Quote: kalibr
    Another thing is surprising: how the Dayaks drill a completely straight pipe in a wooden trunk 1 m 80 cm long

    Vyacheslav, but they definitely didn’t “forge” it from wood lol All processing of wood and even annealed steel require different technologies. But I made 10cm for one interesting device back in school... under D4 from 550 reinforcement feel 6,5x16 bully
    1. +2
      18 February 2024 07: 41
      Quote from Enceladus
      Quote: kalibr
      Another thing is surprising: how the Dayaks drill a completely straight pipe in a wooden trunk 1 m 80 cm long

      Vyacheslav, but they definitely didn’t “forge” it from wood lol All processing of wood and even annealed steel require different technologies. But I made 10cm for one interesting device back in school... under D4 from 550 reinforcement feel 6,5x16 bully

      Yes, made of wood. But thickness and length matter! 10 cm and 180 cm are different categories.
      1. +2
        18 February 2024 07: 54
        Well, of course I don’t know what they had there. I had access to a lathe. You can do a lot of things with cutters there... of course with a 4-jaw chuck, I already said that - another kind of fun wassat Sometimes you spend several times more time positioning a part than directly processing it. In general, our hands are not for boredom feel My father inserted the caps a couple of times... then he realized that I was interested in the process, not the result, and gave up - he just said so that no one would see or know (well, my friend and I were co-bordants)... well, as a bonus - every weekend I went to the shooting range (PM, Ksyukha, and then I shot guns from our forensic expert. Actually, I wanted to go along this line after school)
      2. +1
        18 February 2024 08: 05
        By the way, there was access to acytelene oxygen... for tempering and hardening, color melting and castings. My father was a welder as a first technician. My favorite welding! I remember when my father gave me Baby with all the snot for my birthday.... he jumped for joy! laughing
        ZY By the way, I was amazed by the modern tig, especially the pulsed one good But you need to train your hand and even read it is useless, only by trial and error - like acytelene fellow
  7. +3
    18 February 2024 13: 27
    It is interesting that, as often happened in the history of weapons, it was invented by a complete stranger who had nothing to do with the company: Leonard Geiger. Moreover, Geiger not only, as it turned out, never worked for the Remington family, but never even met any of them.

    But the company's employee was another person: Joseph Ryder. And so he designed his shutter almost simultaneously with Geiger. Ryder received his patent on November 15, 1864, and Geiger on April 17, 1866.

    And then this is what happened: the Remington company did not sue for violation of the patent rights of its employee and engage in petty litigation, but simply bought Geiger’s patent. This made the two Geiger brothers rich, but now everyone began to call the shutter designed by Leonard Geiger “Remington”!

    Only now I noticed this moment. Here you, Vyacheslav Olegovich, were seriously mistaken.
    Leonard Geiger patented his lock in 1863. Remington bought this patent from him and his partner Charles Alger and put it into production. This design was called "Split Breech Remington". This lock is also called a “cut” lock. It's clear from the photo why. Its design is in the first photo. In 1863, Joseph Rider improved this system and it was called the "Remington System". This design is in the second photo. If you compare the photos, the difference is very clearly visible.
    Source - book Sawyer, Sawyer, Charles Winthrop (1920). Firearms in American History: Our Rifles.
    1. +2
      18 February 2024 15: 40
      Quote: Dekabrist
      Source - book Sawyer, Sawyer, Charles Winthrop (1920). Firearms in American History: Our Rifles.

      Thank you!
  8. +4
    18 February 2024 14: 51
    Well...The Remington rifle was once one of my favorite weapons! As I already “admitted” that in my youth I was fascinated by the topic of “hit and miss” and the Remington rifle was considered by me as one of the best examples for reproduction in, for example, the 18th century, thanks to its simplicity and the reliability of this simplicity! So I “created” a flint-impact “version” of “Remington”! I also wanted to add “5 kopecks” in the comment “about Remington”... and the comment was already ready! But the computer froze and the comment disappeared! I was upset...the mood disappeared...I decided not to restore the comment because of its decent size...I’ll just add this video “about Remington”...at least something!
  9. +1
    18 February 2024 17: 00
    But this rifle had a very serious flaw, because of which it eventually left the arena of military weapons.

    Left the arena of military weapons before...
    The First World War begins!
    And the main buyer of this rifle was FRANCE!
    1. +2
      18 February 2024 19: 08
      Quote: hohol95
      Left the arena of military weapons before...
      The First World War begins!

      The Remington rifle (Rolling Block Rifle) fought in the 20th century and after WW1! Some of the latest wars are 1. The Civil War in Spain (1936-1939); 2. In Greece (WWII 2); 3. Israeli militants in 1948.
      Quote: hohol95
      And the main buyer of this rifle was FRANCE!

      Remington M1867 rifles and M1870 carbines were in service with the armies of Sweden, Norway and Switzerland. Egypt and Sudan, Ethiopia and Morocco, Persia, Turkey, Yemen, Israel (!) had these weapons, where they were used in 1948, then Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Honduras, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba and Puerto -Rico, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, French Guiana, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Trinidad, Uruguay, Venezuela, Cambodia, China, Japan, Philippines and even New Zealand !
      1. +2
        18 February 2024 22: 32
        Excellent track record.
        But the Chinese also used wick arquebuses when fighting the Japanese.
  10. 0
    18 February 2024 17: 11
    Thanks for the interesting article! The comments on it were no less interesting. The portrait at the beginning of the material was clearly made from a photograph.
  11. +1
    18 February 2024 21: 56
    it also produced its world masterpiece - a cavalry carbine with a crane bolt or, as they say in English-speaking countries, a “rolling block” bolt.

    Regarding the valve valve, this is not a completely clear term. Rotating valves have different designs in terms of locking, although this is lost in translation from English into Russian - Rotating and Rolling.
    There is an option with a cylinder with a cutout, in which the cylinder axis is parallel to the axis of the barrel, locking is carried out by turning the cylinder - this is a “Rotating drum bolt”, a rotating bolt, such as the Werndl rifle. From there came the classic sliding bolts, with rotating bolt locking - “Rotating bolt”.
    Remington has a different bolt design - “Rolling block”. Its axis of the cylinder part is located perpendicular to the bore, and the bolt is moved to the forward position by turning, and is locked by the trigger stop in a special protrusion on the bolt.
    The pictures show a rotating bolt, a Werndl rifle and a Remington bolt diagram.
    PS The author already had an article on this topic on VO.
    https://topwar.ru/85272-remington-samaya-prostaya-vintovka-na-svete.html
    1. -1
      19 February 2024 06: 21
      Quote from solar
      This is not a very clear term.

      And yet in our literature it is constantly used.
    2. 0
      20 February 2024 00: 20
      In the “Russian-language” literature “about weapons,” the Remington bolt was often called a folding (backward!) bolt in comparison with the folding (to the side or forward) bolts of the then-common “conversion” guns!
  12. 0
    18 February 2024 22: 18
    Problems with drawings
    The bolt action and the Werndl rifle
  13. +1
    19 February 2024 07: 52
    Many thanks to the Author for an interesting excursion.

    I most associate the Remington carbine with General Custer.

    Why did he choose this weapon - as far as I remember, the Sprigfields (or Sharps, I don’t remember exactly) that the US soldiers were armed with, during prolonged shooting they somehow warmed up strangely and it was impossible to remove the cartridge case from them. The Remington was reliable and simple - sort of like an AK. Strange, but in that battle the Indians were much better armed than the regular US Army. Optimization. not otherwise.
    1. +1
      19 February 2024 11: 50
      Quote: S.Z.
      Strange, but in that battle the Indians were much better armed than the regular US Army.

      I had two articles here about the Battle of Little Big Horn. And there is a novel "People and Weapons" by the author. there. Both the articles and the novel describe in detail how this could happen.
  14. 0
    6 March 2024 11: 52
    Well, I already boasted about a pneumatic replica of the Remington 1875 revolver, I have nothing to add.