Long before the Merkava: the first stages of development of the IDF tank fleet

12
Long before the Merkava: the first stages of development of the IDF tank fleet
Tanks M4 and Cromwell, 1948. Photo National Library of Israel


Currently, the tank units of the Israeli ground forces are equipped only with locally designed and produced Merkava tanks. The first tanks of this series were put into service in the late seventies, and before that time the Israel Defense Forces were forced to use only imported equipment. These were not always modern combat vehicles, and the process of development of armored forces faced certain limitations.



First steps


During the War of Independence, the Israeli armed forces did not have full-fledged armored vehicles, incl. tanks. A temporary solution to this problem was a variety of armored vehicles made on an accessible basis. They made it possible to cover current needs, but for further military construction, full-fledged tanks and equipment of other classes were required.

Even during the War of Independence, Israel began to receive foreign military assistance in the form of outdated armored vehicles. Later, after the end of hostilities, these processes continued. The first tank of the IDF is considered to be the British cruiser Mk VIII Cromwell. In addition, the American M4 Sherman medium tank and its modernized variants played a major role in the development of the IDF tank forces. Equipment of this line came to Israel from the USA, France and other countries. In total, according to various sources, at least several hundred Shermans were shipped.


AMX-13 made in France. Photo National Library of Israel

In the first half of the fifties, the French industry began delivering AMX-13 light tanks with a 75 mm gun. In total, 100 of these machines were delivered over several years.

During the same period, Israel and the UK began negotiations for the supply of new Centurion medium/main tanks. The first contract on this topic appeared in 1958, and deliveries began in 1959. Subsequently, several more similar contracts appeared, providing for the supply of new modifications to the Centurions. Over the entire period, the IDF has supplied at least 1000-1100 tanks that were either new or removed from service with the British Army.

A mixed fleet of American, French and British-made tanks first saw action in 1956 during the Suez Crisis. The IDF suffered some losses, but compensated for them. We managed to take 40 Egyptian M4 tanks, suitable for restoration, as trophies. After the necessary repairs, they were accepted into service.


Tanks "Magah-3" - M48 after Israeli modernization. Photo National Library of Israel

Next generation


A new stage in the construction of IDF armored forces began in the mid-sixties. The existing Shermans and AMX-13s, despite all the measures taken, were by this time morally and physically outdated. "Centurions" of various modifications still satisfied the army in a qualitative sense, but their number did not correspond to the existing threats.

The solution to this problem was the American-made M48 Patton medium tanks, which received the Israeli name “Magah-1”. The IDF received hundreds of such vehicles directly from the United States and from some friendly NATO countries. By the mid-sixties, the Pattons had become obsolete, but even in this case they were better than the previously available M4s. In addition, deliveries of British Centurions in current versions continued.

With a mixed fleet of US and UK-made equipment, Israel entered the Six-Day War. In the battles, the IDF suffered significant losses in armored vehicles, approx. 400 units, but at the same time was able to capture rich trophies. She received significant quantities of armored vehicles, incl. tanks suitable for further use.


Captured T-54/55 in the process of restructuring. Photo by Israeli Ministry of Defense

According to known data, the IDF recaptured up to 90 M48 tanks and about three dozen Centurions from the Jordanian army, not counting other equipment. In addition, the trophies were approx. 80 T-54 tanks, up to 50 T-55 vehicles and 6 amphibious PT-76 belonging to the Egyptian armed forces. Former Jordanian armored vehicles, after minor repairs, entered service with the Israeli army. We had to work with Soviet-style equipment, but it also ended up in units. Captured T-54/55 were called "Tiran-1/2".

In the early seventies, new deliveries of tanks from the USA began. This time, M60s arrived in Israel, locally renamed Magakh-6. In 1971, the first large batch of 150 tanks was shipped, and later the number of such equipment was increased to 700-800 units.

During the Yom Kippur War in 1973, the IDF again lost over 400 tanks of all models and was again able to compensate for the losses with trophies. After repairs, another 350 Soviet-made Tyrants were supplied to the troops. We also managed to capture approx. 80 newer T-62s, named "Tiran-6". The fleet of floating PT-76s was replenished with 19 new vehicles.


Tank "Tiran-6Sh" - T-55 with a 105 mm gun. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

By the end of the seventies, Israel was able to start production of its first Merkava tank, which reduced the need for foreign equipment. Over the next few years, purchases of tanks abroad continued, but then stopped. Over all this time, according to various sources, up to 750-800 M48 Patton tanks and no more than 1300-1400 M60 vehicles were delivered.

Lean approach


Until the end of the seventies, Israel could not establish its own tank production, and the supply of foreign equipment imposed certain restrictions. In this regard, the IDF tried to carefully handle the tanks, promptly restore them after breakdowns, and also carry out modernizations.

In the mid-fifties, the existing M4 tanks were upgraded to the M50 project, also known by the unofficial designation Supersherman. This tank retained the main components and mechanisms, but received a 75 mm CN-75-50 cannon from the French AMX-13 tank. By the middle of the next decade, this refinement had been completed approx. 300 Shermans. In 1962, serial modernization of tanks began under the M51 project, another modification of the M4, equipped with a new power plant, suspension and a French-made 105 mm gun. Only 180 tanks underwent this modification.


"Magah-6" or M60 dj during the fighting in Lebanon, 1982. Photo of the Israeli Ministry of Defense

Already in the battles of the fifties, AMX-13 tanks did not perform well. It was for this reason that they decided to transfer the French 75 mm gun to the more protected M4. The remaining light tanks were later sold abroad. The same fate befell all the remaining Shermans - but this happened already in the seventies.

American M48s received the local designation "Magah-1" and subsequently underwent three successive upgrades with sequential numbering. As it developed, the Patton tank received a new power plant, enhanced protection, incl. mounted, as well as a 105 mm gun. The last in this series was the Magah-5 tank.

In the late sixties, a project to modernize the Centurion tank called “Shot Kal” appeared. On its basis, three more serial projects and one experimental one were completed. The equipment was updated by replacing some devices. First of all, the fire controls were replaced, while the hull and power plant remained the same. Apparently, over time, all remaining Centurion tanks were rebuilt according to the Shot Kal project - at least 1000-1100 units.


Serial MBT "Merkava Mk 1". Photo: Wikimedia Commons

American-made M60 tanks served under the name "Magah-6/7". Based on the existing design, almost 12 modifications with a different power plant, improved weapons and/or fire control devices were developed. The latest versions of "Magaha" were created already in the nineties.

Captured T-54/55 and T-62 were put into service and operated in their original configuration. At the end of the sixties, an attempt was made to equip the T-54 and T-55 with a new 105-mm gun of the NATO standard, but not all existing tanks received it. Subsequently, due to the obsolescence of the Tyrants and the emergence of new capabilities, it was decided to rebuild Soviet-made tanks into heavy armored personnel carriers Akhzarit.

New era


Thanks to foreign equipment, obtained commercially or otherwise, the IDF was able to equip its armored units and even use them effectively in real conflicts. However, dependence on imports had its own negative characteristics and created undesirable risks.


Combatant "Merkava Mk 2". Photo by Israeli Ministry of Defense

Thus, despite all efforts, the tank fleet of the Israeli army remained unified, which made work, maintenance and supply difficult. In addition, the supply of equipment and spare parts depended on the will and desire of third countries. Finally, it was not always possible to acquire modern models with high tactical and technical characteristics.

In the late sixties, Israel and Great Britain negotiated the supply of Chieftain tanks. It was not possible to find a common language, and the further rearmament of the IDF was in question. In this regard, in 1970 it was decided to develop its own tank according to its own tactical and technical requirements. Development processes, production launch, etc. took several years, and in 1979 the IDF received the first production tanks of the new Merkava Mk 1 model.

Having started production of its own tank, Israel gradually abandoned the purchase of foreign equipment. Over time, the army received a large number of Merkava tanks, which supplanted other combat vehicles and became the basis of the armored forces. At the same time, they did not abandon the old machines - they were kept in service, modernized or rebuilt according to new designs.

In recent decades, the IDF has completed the transition to tanks of its own production. "Tyrants", "Shots" or "Magakhs" were completely abandoned as linear equipment for tank units. Further development of armored forces is also planned to be carried out on our own and using equipment of our own design. New tanks to replace the Merkava are already being developed and are expected in the foreseeable future.
12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    6 February 2024 04: 53
    oh well. Those Jews and these Jews are no match for each other! They were stronger than ever, and these swindlers are doing this to Hamas for the second time.
  2. +8
    6 February 2024 05: 09
    Compared to other publications by this author, this article is not bad, although very superficial.
    1. -6
      6 February 2024 05: 16
      Quote: Tucan
      Compared to other publications by this author

      Yes? Why did she interest you? You seem to be in aviation...
      1. +2
        6 February 2024 05: 19
        Quote: svp67
        Quote: Tucan
        Compared to other publications by this author

        Yes? Why did she interest you? You seem to be in aviation...

        Just like you on tanks wink
        After our dialogue on the Us.Khok air defense system, one of the authors of the defense, specializing in air defense, asked to share statistics on the use of this complex.
    2. +14
      6 February 2024 10: 06
      this article is not bad

      Well, of course it’s not bad, let’s take a look:
      Mikhail Baryatinsky "Israeli tanks in battle"
      https://royallib.com/read/baryatinskiy_mihail/izrailskie_tanki_v_boyu.html#0
      Baryatinsky - “our everything.”

      IMHO, there are several Russian-language blogs on the RuNet that provide information on the topic from primary sources. But most sources on the topic are either in English or Hebrew. There were several Israelis here on the forum, including tankers, who could write something original, and not rewrite Baryatinsky’s (not entirely accurate) articles. But, for obvious reasons, they no longer post here.
      Although there are several topics that could be described not in a series of articles, but in one article. For example, about “tank-bulences” - due to the removal of part of the tank, a doctor and intensive care equipment were placed in Merkava, judging by the photo, there is also CPR , and oxygen, and plasma/blood transfusion systems.
      "Two female soldiers were awarded the Commendation for bravery in action in Lebanon 2006: Captain Marina Kaminski and Petty Officer Keren Tendler (posthumously)
      Captain Kaminski was the tank commander. The tank-bulence is an ordinary Merkava tank, converted into a mobile medical unit and equipped with medical equipment. During the battle, the tank-bulence is used as an “ambulance” to provide first aid and evacuate the wounded.
      Captain Kaminski and the crew of her tank-bulence, under enemy fire, pulled wounded tank crews and infantrymen out of burning tanks and provided them with first aid. She carried the wounded on her tank-bulence to the helipad, from where the wounded were taken by helicopter to a hospital in Haifa.
      After the evacuation of the wounded, Captain Marina Kaminski returned to the battle formations of her battalion again and again. In total, during the fighting, military doctor Captain Marina Kaminski treated more than 25 wounded soldiers.
      Currently, Colonel Marina Kaminski heads the medical service of the Ground Forces.
      Colonel Marina Kaminski: “A soldier must know that there are those who will take care of him, that there are those who can save him.”
      https://shaon.livejournal.com/375031.html

      Or the topic of “female tank crews” - with a certain reduction in requirements (if I understand correctly, they were trained for “border patrol” crew by crew, without an “advanced tanker course as part of combined arms combat as part of a unit”), the option turned out to be quite combat-ready:

      https://youtu.be/zlyO6uNZCYY
  3. +4
    6 February 2024 05: 14
    French 75 mm cannon
    The irony of fate is that the gun itself was German, the one that was installed on the Panther
    1. +3
      6 February 2024 05: 21
      Quote: svp67
      French 75 mm cannon
      The irony of fate is that the gun itself was German, the one that was installed on the Panther

      But it seems like it has an automatic loader.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. -2
      6 February 2024 08: 33
      Quote: svp67
      The irony of fate is that the gun itself was German, the one that was installed on the Panther

      With the same ballistics, and on the base, but not the same...
    4. +2
      6 February 2024 12: 13
      At one time: "Panther" was created as a German version of the T-34. But their aim was perfect.
      I bow to our tank crews, who beat the Teutons with primitive sights
      1. +4
        6 February 2024 16: 07
        And the panther had thicker armor
  4. -4
    6 February 2024 12: 05
    As we were told: in 1948, several Jews who served in the English army were stolen: 2 "Cromwell" - these were their first tanks.
    I must admit, they are great: from the T-34 to the Sherman, they are completely different vehicles, the components are also completely different, but they managed to fit everything to one standard.
    I heard that Kuwait will supply the Ukrainians: M-48. I doubt that they will be a serious force: 1) they are already outdated, 2 local “unique” techniques are still the same. They need tanks: 1-2 per year. There is a huge difference between arriving in terms of area and fighting and driving around in area.
  5. +5
    6 February 2024 16: 46
    The article on the topic is indeed interesting, but speaking about the first steps on BT, the IDF allows for so many mistakes and inaccuracies. There is a mention of "Cromwell". But it is said as about one tank. It’s a gift that there were two of them, and both were stolen. And 1950-1951 delivered 25 used ones from the once great Britain. But there really was only one “Sherman” in 1948, but not a word about it. Also, not a word is said about the presence of as many as 1948 French N-10s in 39. About the AMX-13 it is indicated that a total of 100 of them were delivered. At the same time, 179 of them were supplied from France in 1955-1968. By the way, in principle there is a number 100. This was the first delivery in 1955-1956. I understand that there are many different sources, but they somehow need to be analyzed and the more truthful ones selected. The same can be said for deliveries of subsequent types of tanks. I think that when writing articles indicating the amount of equipment, you need to use more respectful sources (SIPRI and others, although there are complaints about SIPRI, but still).