BespokeGun Raptor series sniper rifles

46
BespokeGun Raptor series sniper rifles
Raptor Tactical .338 LM rifle and ammo case


Russian snipers participating in the Special Operation to protect Donbass are armed with high-precision weapons of various types of domestic production. Some units are equipped with BespokeGun Raptor series sniper rifles from Moscow armory company." The first samples of this family appeared, went into production and entered the army last year. Another modification of the Raptor was presented just the other day.



Rifles for the army


The Moscow Arms Company began developing and producing its own models of high-precision weapons in 2019. Over the past years, it has created several models of elite-class sports and hunting weapons, as well as their modifications for different cartridges, in various designs, etc. The products are produced under the BespokeGun brand - “Weapons to order”. At the same time, the company did not deal with military weapons in the early years.

According to some reports, in 2022, BespokeGun rifles ended up in the Special Operations area, where they were used as high-precision sniper weapons. In the wake of these events, the IOC decided to develop, based on the accumulated experience, a full-fledged sniper complex, initially designed for operation and use in the army.


"Raptor Tactical" in a standard transport case

The presence of appropriate developments and production capacity helped the company solve this problem in a limited time. In addition, the Russian company CNC GC was involved in the design. She had to develop a new stock that would meet all the features and characteristics of the future rifle.

The result of the joint work was presented in February 2023; the new rifle was called Raptor or Raptor Tactical. It was a long-barreled bolt-action weapon chambered for .338 Lapua Magnum (8,6x70 mm), capable of accurate shooting at ranges of at least 1800-2000 m. Later it was reported that rifles of this type are supplied to the army and used by our snipers in during the demilitarization of Ukrainian formations.

By the end of February, the second model of the family was presented - the Raptor Sport rifle. This product was developed with the participation of the Russian Special Forces University. It almost completely repeats the design of the base sample, but uses the 6.5 PRC cartridge (6,5x51 mm). Such ammunition provides high ballistic characteristics, but significantly reduces the load on the structure and reduces wear. The new model rifle was seen as a sporting and/or training counterpart to the original Raptor .338 LM.


Raptor Sport rifle

On January 15, 2024, the IOC spoke for the first time about the next rifle in the family. The Raptor Tactical sniper system chambered for .300 Norma Magnum has been brought into production. As in the case of the sports modification, the main components and solutions are retained, and the new cartridge provides optimal combat and operational characteristics.

Thus, in just a year, the Moscow Arms Company presented three new high-precision rifle systems intended for use in the army and in other areas. According to published data, Raptor Tactical rifles have been supplied to sniper units for quite a long time and are used at the front. We are already talking about at least dozens of complexes. It is likely that over time the number of such weapons in the armed forces will only increase.

General solutions


The three rifles in the BespokeGun Raptor series have a similar appearance and differ minimally from each other in terms of design. Projects are based on common solutions and components. In this case, different ammunition is used, and the designs are adapted to them. As a result, the customer gets the opportunity to choose a product that best suits his requirements and needs.


Demonstration of the accuracy and accuracy of a sports rifle

In the manufacture of these weapons, modern materials and technologies are used, due to which high production precision and increased accuracy characteristics are achieved. It is important that the IOC itself produces all the key parts of the weapon. In addition, there is an integrated approach - along with the rifle, the customer is given a set of necessary additional devices and accessories.

In addition, the customer is offered cartridges of compatible models in the required design - with the required cartridge case and bullet, the required weight, etc. The use of such cartridges allows you to make maximum use of the technical potential of the rifle.

The Raptor series rifles are built according to the traditional design. A steel tubular receiver of limited length is used in which the barrel is secured and the bolt moves. Together, these parts are mounted on a specially designed aluminum stock with an integrated stock and control handle, as well as mounting spaces for additional devices. The length of such a weapon in the firing position, depending on the barrel used, can exceed 1 m. Weight - 7,165 kg.

Three products are equipped with barrels ranging from 26 to 28 inches (660-711) mm long. There are pronounced valleys on the outer surface of the trunks. The muzzle has a thread for installing compensator brakes or low-noise shooting devices. The 8.6 mm (.338 LM) barrel has rifling pitches of 9, 9,5 or 10 inches (228, 241 or 254 mm). The 6,5 mm barrel is rifled with a 7,5 inch (190,5 mm) twist. There are three chamber options for working with different ammunition.


The latest Raptor Tactical rifle chambered for .300 Norma Magnum

The rifles have a sliding bolt for manual reloading. Locking is carried out by turning three locking stops. In this case, the shutter rotates 60° relative to the longitudinal axis. This is less than other rifles and somewhat speeds up the reloading process. Due to the use of a fairly powerful Lapua Magnum cartridge, the locking unit has an increased safety margin. In modifications for other ammunition, similar bolts with the appropriate geometry are used, which also maintain a safety margin.

All Raptor Tactical variants use a detachable 5-round box magazine. Shops made of conventional plastic and carbon fiber are offered. A carbon magazine is lighter than a plastic one, and also has poor thermal conductivity and protects ammunition from changes in external temperatures.

Top Picatinny rails are provided on the receiver and forend for mounting compatible sights. The bipod of the desired model is placed under the forend. KeyMod interfaces for corresponding devices are provided on the sides of the handguard. The stock rifle stock also provides some adaptation to the shooter's needs. It is foldable and equipped with an adjustable butt plate and cheek piece.


Raptor Tactical .338 LM in the Special Operations area

BespokeGun Raptor rifles have high firing performance. The most powerful model of the series, using the 8,5x70 mm cartridge, has an effective firing range of up to 2 km. The range of the new Raptor Tactical .300 NM is slightly less, and the Raptor Sport hits at 1700 m. High accuracy and accuracy of fire are declared at all calculated distances. The firing performance of all three presented rifles meets the requirements for sporting and combat use. Thus, over the entire range of firing ranges, the bullet retains energy sufficient to destroy manpower and unprotected materiel.

Manufacturing quality and combat performance come at a price. Thus, on the official website of the BespokeGun brand, the cost of the Raptor Tactical and Raptor Sport complexes is indicated as “from 1 rubles.” The final price depends on the composition of the complex and the included components.

Needs and opportunities


The army needs small arms of various classes, from mass-produced machine guns and machine guns to high-precision sniper systems produced in limited series. Our arms industry produces a variety of products of all classes and meets the needs of the armed forces. At the same time, the production of the most complex samples from the field of precision weapons was mastered only in recent years.

The Moscow Arms Company made a significant contribution to the re-equipment of snipers and the introduction of weapons with improved characteristics. It has already developed a whole range of sporting and hunting rifles with special parameters, and has recently been working on military systems. Apparently, the IOC will continue to work in this direction, as a result of which the BespokeGun Raptor line will be replenished with new interesting models.
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    22 January 2024 07: 20
    All bourgeois names! Well, with us, everything is done with an eye on the owner, everything should be tailored to the masters, as if to be in trend, it’s just terrible, something straight out of the 90s. Well, your language is rich, there are more letters, recruit guys with imagination, they will come up with names for you if you can’t do it yourself. It's simply disgraceful, slavish thinking!
    1. +3
      22 January 2024 07: 35
      I fully support you! This is exactly what I wanted to write about!
    2. +1
      22 January 2024 08: 10
      Please start, you. Lead by example. Throw out all borrowed words from your vocabulary, start with “computer”, “laser”, “smartphone”. Let's remember about “shoe”, “chest”, etc. What will you use, you original one of ours?
      1. +2
        22 January 2024 09: 46
        Yes, everything is done for their market in fact. I don’t know a single guy who had them. Call it Matryoshka - and no one will buy it there laughing
        Quote: Letterhead
        Let's remember about “shoe”, “chest”, etc. What will you use, you original one of ours?

        Call him "Slipper" good laughing
      2. +2
        22 January 2024 14: 22
        Take it out of your vocabulary

        Borrowing is completely different.
        These are new words that replenish and enrich the language with new concepts. Borrowings are appropriate where it is difficult to accurately name a new concept using existing words.
        Same computer. There is a synonym in Russian - computer. But modern computers are no longer just electronic, they are much more complex than the “need for power supply”, computing, but the Latin compute also includes in its meaning numerous other functions of computers, not only the calculation of formulas, but also storage, collection (accumulation), well and the word machine in the abbreviation is more suitable for simpler mechanisms than microprocessors and boards, the word machine is more suitable for some kind of machine or internal combustion engine.
        Borrowings appear precisely with new concepts, new meanings. Synonyms are never equivalent, and kringe is not equal to shame.
        But the name Bespoke Gun is absolutely bourgeois. Even translated into Russian
        1. +1
          23 January 2024 10: 03
          I agree with you, but I’ll try to get my point across: let’s take the same “computer” as an example, even if our industry was advanced in this regard, its influence spread to other countries through exported computing hardware and software, then domestic terms were firmly established at first in vocabulary of specialists associated with computers, and through them to a wide range of users. And now on the planet it would sound like “EViM”, not a computer)
          1. +3
            23 January 2024 12: 24
            I understand, it’s also a shame for the country, but alas, computers from the dungeons of scientific research institutes came to our country already in the 90s, nothing can be done.
            But when you can come up with a name from scratch, then why not Russian. Considering how we know how to call military and weapons products.
            They wanted a Bespoke Gun, they would call it “Gostinets”, both in Russian and with irony, and it seems like everything that is originally Russian is fashionable now.
      3. 0
        30 January 2024 12: 08
        There is no need to throw anything away. Our language easily accepts foreign words by adapting them. Appetite for example. This speaks of its excellent adaptability and flexibility. It’s just that language is one of the foundations of the existence of any nation.
    3. 0
      22 January 2024 12: 27
      Why is it that Lobaev always calls it Stalingrad?
    4. 0
      22 January 2024 15: 55
      Quote: Vadim S
      Well, your language is rich, there are more letters, recruit guys with imagination, they will come up with names for you if you can’t do it yourself. It's simply disgraceful, slavish thinking!

      The problem is that in addition to the West, there is also the East. This is an opportunity to simply enter the world market. And I don’t think it’s possible to translate Darner (for example) into many languages. The Russian language is multifaceted and its direct analogues are sometimes perceived strangely by foreigners by ear.
    5. 0
      30 January 2024 12: 02
      It’s really not clear the desire to name and write in English! Is it really possible that in our language, which is without exaggeration great, there are no beautiful combinations and names + a beautiful font to be developed?
    6. KV
      0
      1 May 2024 17: 09
      Estoy de acuerdo con lo que has dicho, pero es posible que los nombres se haya elegido así para que sea atractivo en el mercado internacional. Por desgracia el Inglés se usa en muchos países como lengua franca, producto de la época colonial.
  2. +1
    22 January 2024 07: 31
    I have a question for the author. Can we make comparisons with the best foreign sniper rifles? For me, the standard is Barrett.
    1. +1
      22 January 2024 09: 50
      And what is the standard? You talk as if you walked with her and have shot at least 5k
  3. +3
    22 January 2024 08: 06
    Question to the editors of the site: I would like to see the author of the article before reading it, so as not to waste time on these bloated parodies of Soviet editorials
    1. 0
      23 January 2024 11: 31
      The author writes on any topic without delving into any one: a sea of ​​water and numerous repetitions to increase the number of characters, for which the editors pay. Well, there are no other authors with a more responsible attitude.
  4. +2
    22 January 2024 08: 11
    With the name and everything else, it’s clear - initially they tried to compete with imported ones. Orsis also stubbornly writes everything in Latin.

    I’m more interested in, which of the mentioned calibers of cartridges do we even produce?
    1. 0
      22 January 2024 17: 34
      Quote: Sancho_SP
      I’m more interested in, which of the mentioned calibers of cartridges do we even produce?

      338 Lapua Magnum are produced accurately. EMNIP, Lobaev had a video in which he branded domestic LMs for not complying with geometry - the difference in the fit of cartridges from one pack into the overall chamber layout reached almost a millimeter, and every second cartridge jammed.
      And no, it was not Barnaul. smile
  5. 0
    22 January 2024 08: 19
    It's probably worth the money... Covering a target with fire 2 km away is worth a lot... Another thing is that it still needs to be detected.
    As for the name, call yours whatever you want. When you do something worthwhile.
  6. -7
    22 January 2024 09: 26
    There are more and more articles about such rifles. Because SVD no longer suits anyone. In modern warfare, a distance of 300-500 meters is nothing. Going on an assault with it is also out of the question, it’s long, heavy, and has a 10-round magazine. Therefore, the SVDshka is neither here nor there. Better with AK.
    1. +3
      22 January 2024 09: 58
      Quote: Arzt
      distances of 300-500 meters are nothing

      Well, kaalashmat in your hands... Nevertheless, these distances have not gone away, and SVD and others feel great there
      Quote: Arzt
      Better with AK
      The practical effective range of a Kalashmat is no more than 400 meters. And the conscript has even less. A height of 400 meters is a quarter of the front sight in width
      Quote: Arzt
      Going on an assault with her is also not the topic,

      I have never seen such a specialty and university. Sniper attack aircraft laughing
      For these purposes, we have AS VAL/VSS + - at distances of 100-200 meters
      1. 0
        22 January 2024 14: 21
        Quote: Arzt
        distances of 300-500 meters are nothing

        Well, kaalashmat in your hands... Nevertheless, these distances have not gone away, and SVD and others feel great there

        So what, they work with it according to the classics? Sniper pairs, etc.?
        1. +2
          22 January 2024 14: 26
          Well, the position of a company (infantry sniper) implies fire support at the squad/platoon level. Those. Tamara and I go as a couple and this never happened. But as a pair - yes, they worked and work quite well. But company commanders, as a rule, are just fighters with good shooting skills and sometimes don’t undergo separate training... and they can continue to do so under a contract.
          Actually, the technical specification itself for the SVD implied the use of the LPS and even BZT gross machine gun cartridge, so I already wrote once - a company officer and a sidekick’s pellet gunner forever. Actually, this was the idea, so as not to expand the range of ammunition and to facilitate supply. the shaft was sufficient at a distance of up to 600 meters, and if reconciliation and selection were used, then at almost 800 meters. Then the 7N1 appeared, and it became a little more fun... but the accuracy of the shaft still fell.
        2. 0
          23 January 2024 10: 27
          Quote: Arzt
          So what, they work with it according to the classics? Sniper pairs, etc.?

          But there is no need to change concepts. smile
          SVD is DMR. Line infantry marksman's rifle. He works in the same formation with the squad/platoon, hitting targets on the battlefield.
          It is called a sniper SVD only because of the poverty of domestic terminology. In which the classic sniper (the one who works as a pair on individual targets, spending up to several days on it) and the marksman (works together with infantry, on targets beyond the effective range of machine guns / assault rifles) are mixed together into one concept - "sniper".
      2. 0
        22 January 2024 14: 22
        Quote: Arzt
        Going on an assault with her is also not the topic,

        I have never seen such a specialty and university. Sniper attack aircraft laughing
        For these purposes, we have AS VAL/VSS + - at distances of 100-200 meters

        That's what I'm talking about. It’s not suitable for assault, like a classic sniper - so-so.
        1. +2
          22 January 2024 14: 32
          A colleague - it is intended to arm a company (infantry sniper) - has already written more than once. It is specifically intended for fighters with greater shooting skills and is recruited from conscripts based on the results of shooting. They are not trained in camouflage or anything like that. chips and are not taught separately in sniper schools. This is just a good shooter for fire support at the squad/platoon level at distances from 300 to 600 meters. Sometimes up to 800. They call it Marxman. And we have everything one size fits all. A sniper is no longer just a good shooter... I’ll tell you this in the same skiff, for example, less than half the training time is spent on shooting - and these are just police snipers.
        2. +2
          22 January 2024 14: 38
          Quote: Arzt
          like a classic sniper - so-so

          The SVD copes with its task and is not a classic sniper by any means. The task is to hit a baby at 600 meters - they didn’t set any other goals for it, but the fact that you can supposedly shoot at 1300 with optics... my friend, more than one beamed to you will not calculate the trajectory because the bullet goes away at 900 meters, and in winter even lower to subsonic level with all that it implies. Derivation (the combination of the magnus and gyroscopic effects) and the non-optimal shape of the bullet for subsonic flight have a significant impact
    2. 0
      23 January 2024 10: 23
      Quote: Arzt
      Going on an assault with it is also out of the question, it’s long, heavy, and has a 10-round magazine.

      The alternative is PC. Line infantry have nothing else chambered for a rifle cartridge.
      Quote: Arzt
      Better with AK.

      The SVD works where the average fighter with an AK can only hit by firing half a BC.
  7. +2
    22 January 2024 10: 04
    Yeah. VO has been constantly pleasing with its incompetence lately. The level of articles leaves much to be desired.
    Firstly, with all due respect to the work done by the IOC, the barrel blanks are imported.
    Secondly, a three-lug bolt group has no advantages in strength over a two-lug bolt group. And three-point (and even six-point) groups are quite common on serial rifles (Mannlicher for example).
    In general, of course, it’s wonderful that products of this level fall into the hands of our soldiers.
    1. 0
      22 January 2024 11: 44
      Quote: KSVK
      Firstly, with all due respect to the work done by the IOC, the barrel blanks are imported.
      There was a video on YouTube of an interview with a manufacturer of elite rifles. The reason why they buy metal (weapons-grade stainless steel) abroad for barrels:
      ours don’t want to cook steel in such minuscule quantities. The composition of the steel is not a problem, a small batch is not profitable.
      1. +1
        22 January 2024 12: 16
        The problem is not that they don’t want to cook, but that they don’t want to pay for it - accordingly, there won’t be any gain. And because the project is openly commercial, and not for the Ministry of Defense - accordingly, this is not profitable for them.

        Yes, and here, despite the fact that the sniper school never sank, there were no “elite” weapons as such, and only after the collapse did some progress begin... although a lot of things remained on the margins. And a lot of samples came from sporting weapons (SV-98, etc.). And before that:
        pug, Svetka - just selection
        SVD - the first specification implied a gross cartridge.
        My grandfather went through the entire war with a captured 98 Mauser and then in the summer of 45 with an Arisaka.
  8. +2
    22 January 2024 10: 17
    Quote: Daisy mower
    I have a question for the author. Can we make comparisons with the best foreign sniper rifles? For me, the standard is Barrett.

    The Barrett is quite an ordinary rifle. There is nothing outstanding in the design.
    And it is ABSOLUTELY incorrect to compare a serially produced rifle adopted for service with an almost one-piece product.
  9. +2
    22 January 2024 10: 22
    Quote: Sancho_SP

    I’m more interested in, which of the mentioned calibers of cartridges do we even produce?

    338LM is produced by Novosibirsk PZ. Only the workmanship is... lame.
    1. +2
      22 January 2024 14: 49
      Yes, I saw them.... it’s just cruel, there’s only swearing or staying silent, just like about the dead. Case overhang is +-0.6, and even then in the best case... even in one pack there can be cartridges with different varnishing. The bullet is buried in different ways... i.e. It’s impossible to find a +-sample even in 1 pack. I shot emnip from the norm - there you open a pack - everything is like heroes for selecting cartridges good YES, varnish is generally not the best idea for such a cartridge. Why don't we have enough brass in the country? belay request, that in fact, almost “piece” cartridges are manufactured according to wartime standards. For athletes, the same thing is produced normally and in small batches, moreover...
      ZY I’ve written more than once in topics about microwaves... I think it’s also under your comment Colleague drinks hi soldier
      1. +1
        22 January 2024 17: 36
        Quote from Enceladus
        Case overhang is +-0.6, and even then in the best case... even in one pack there can be cartridges with different varnishing.

        In Lobaev’s video, one pack from Novosib contained cartridges with and without annealing.
        And yes, the extraction of cartridge cases from this plant was carried out using the PTRD method - by striking the bolt handle.

        The PTRD, remember, had a standard beater for this purpose. Might include one in the kit sniper rifles? wink
        1. +1
          22 January 2024 17: 40
          Send me a link to the video in a private message - it’s interesting to see from the Forehead, or here... so that there are no doubters hi soldier
  10. +1
    22 January 2024 10: 29
    Quote: Sancho_SP
    I’m more interested in which of the announced calibers cartridges in general are issued?

    The question isn’t even this: releasing or producing high-quality products are two different approaches (we could handle the first, but the second...)
    but we have problems with this, so only imported cartridges, or use SVD
    but if it’s deeper, then the question is acute - there are also problems with cartridges, gunpowder and bullets, with capsules
    so one rifle is not enough to get results!
  11. 0
    22 January 2024 11: 24
    According to published data, Raptor Tactical rifles have been supplied to sniper units for quite a long time and are used at the front. We are already talking about at least dozens of complexes.
    More precisely, more than three hundred.
    https://youtu.be/i1wXXS-Q51c
  12. -1
    22 January 2024 11: 38
    Quote from Enceladus
    And what is the standard? You talk as if you walked with her and have shot at least 5k

    Hello! This is the generally accepted standard for 12,7 mm rifles for sure. It's like Pushkin in literature.
    1. +2
      22 January 2024 12: 27
      Who admitted? Matt from Demolition Ranch? Now, you can count the number of snipers who actually used it effectively in battle on one hand, because... it was used precisely for its main purpose - anti-material and it was developed for these tasks. According to your PTRS and PTRD are also sniper rifles and a standard lol
      Quote: Mower of daisies
      It's like Pushkin in literature

      I don’t like Pushkin, yes, Yesenin. And if you don’t know how to answer a question in what where when - answer Pushkin laughing in my opinion, or the late Voroshilov’s phrase or Druz (I don’t remember)
  13. +1
    22 January 2024 11: 49
    but uses the 6.5 PRC cartridge (6,5x51 mm). Such ammunition provides high ballistic characteristics, but significantly reduces the load on the structure and reduces wear.

    And for the shooter too....the shooter needs a shot, and shooting from a .338 means problems with the head and retina
  14. 0
    22 January 2024 13: 09
    Quote: Bad_gr
    Quote: KSVK
    Firstly, with all due respect to the work done by the IOC, the barrel blanks are imported.
    There was a video on YouTube of an interview with a manufacturer of elite rifles. The reason why they buy metal (weapons-grade stainless steel) abroad for barrels:
    ours don’t want to cook steel in such minuscule quantities. The composition of the steel is not a problem, a small batch is not profitable.

    It's not just and not so much about the metal. The issue is about single-pass cutting machines, which are used to mainly produce high-precision barrels. We have such equipment only on Orsis and it is made in America. There is indeed unverified information that another manufacturer of barrels has appeared, but there is no information about what kind of equipment there is, and the caliber of the blanks so far seems to be only 30th.
  15. -1
    22 January 2024 14: 40
    Quote: Vadim S
    All bourgeois names! Well, we do everything with an eye on the owner,


    That's right.
    And they want to give the buyer a wave.
    After all, such weapons are not acquired by poor people who, as a rule, fly to “unwashed Russia” only to earn money, from Monday to Friday. And on Friday evenings they leave the borders of “Mordor”, in the comfortable chairs of their personal SuperJet, or Bombardier.

    We lick and grind the remains of our teeth:

    https://gunsbroker.ru/hunting/665216_vintovka-bespokegun-elegance-hunter-308-win.html

    A measly 1 rubles.
    And this is in the “people's” 308 caliber!

    P.S. advertising article is recognized as conditionally successful.
  16. +1
    22 January 2024 17: 45
    Quote from Enceladus
    YES, varnish is generally not the best idea for such a cartridge. Why don't we have enough brass in the country?

    Our brass sleeve is made only by the same notorious oil refinery. The sleeve is crap to put it mildly. Especially the one with a groove at the bottom. It breaks along this groove. And the varnish... I drowned the carbine once. There were 5 rounds in the magazine. Self-assembled. The carbine lay at a depth of 6 meters for a day. And ALL the cartridges worked properly and there was no varnish, just a brass sleeve.
  17. 0
    25 January 2024 13: 47
    Not bad results for a rifle...
  18. 0
    April 1 2024 08: 37
    Here in the comments they are trying to compare IOC high-precision rifles with SVD. Dear ones, these are weapons of different classes. High-precision systems are for the tasks of athletes and special forces snipers, and the SVD is a battlefield weapon for an army sniper.