Kentucky rifle, Pennsylvania rifle, long rifle or widowmaker

38
Kentucky rifle, Pennsylvania rifle, long rifle or widowmaker
"Kentucky Rifle"*, ca. 1810 Gunsmith John Spitzer. Maple stock with silver and brass finish. Overall length: 162,3 cm. Walters Art Museum, Baltimore


- Nice gun, Fidget! –
St. John's Wort finally exclaimed. –
It's really a pity that it fell into the hands of women.
The hunters have already told me about him,
and I heard that it brings certain death,
when it is in good hands.
Look at this castle -
even a wolf trap is not equipped with one like this
accurately working spring,
the trigger and the pawl operate simultaneously,
like two singing teachers,
singing a psalm at a prayer meeting.
I've never seen such an accurate sight,
Fidget, you can be sure of that.

James Fenimore Cooper "St. John's Wort, or the First Warpath"

Weapon and people. It often happened that the development of firearms and, in particular, the same rifles, was influenced by factors of a natural geographical nature. For example, the so-called Little Ice Age, a time of global relative cooling on Earth during the 14th–19th centuries, caused a demand for cloth (and the development of cloth making in Europe) and an increased demand for furs, and in particular for beaver pelts. And since there are practically no beavers left on European territory, they began to be hunted in the lands of North America.



Hunters went away from residential areas for a long time, and carried everything they owned, including weapons and ammunition for it, on themselves, so the weight of round bullets began to be of particular importance, as well as the accuracy of each individual shot. Another factor was barter with the Indians. They were also sold guns and demanded in payment for them furs, stacked from the butt to the end of the barrel!

It is clear that the profit from such trade was simply colossal, but it was soon noticed that the accuracy of such guns was much higher than that of relatively short-barreled and large-caliber muskets. Then rifled barrels began to be installed on such guns, which became known among hunters as “deer-killers”**, which further increased the accuracy of such long guns.


A typical "long rifle" with a flintlock. Gunsmith: Henry Young (c. 1775 – c. 1833). Date of manufacture: approx. 1800–1820 Pennsylvania, Easton Township, Northampton County. Material: wood (maple), steel, iron, brass, silver. Overall length: 154,9 cm. Barrel length: 116,5 cm. Caliber: 12,4 mm. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

True, initially on the border they preferred long-barreled firearms - a smoothbore musket, which was produced at enterprises in England and France and sent to the colonies for sale. But gradually long rifles became more and more popular due to their longer firing range.

The effective range of a smoothbore musket was less than 100 yards (91 m), while a rifled rifle shooter could hit a man-sized target from a distance of 200 yards or more. True, the price of such accuracy was that reloading a long rifle took much longer.


A case for bullets and wads on the butt of a rifle by gunsmith J. Benjamin Caf. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

This, or something like this, is how the famous long rifle was born, which was developed on the American frontier in southeastern Pennsylvania in the early 1700s.

Most likely, this was the work of German gunsmiths who emigrated to the USA and organized the production of hunting rifles here. States such as Pennsylvania, Virginia, Tennessee, Kentucky, Ohio and North Carolina became the centers of their production, and they were produced until the 20th century as a very practical and effective firearm for rural areas of the country.

The fact is that they could be made entirely by hand, using the simplest tools, in frontier conditions.


Long rifle of George Schreyer the Elder (1739–1819). Date of manufacture: approx. 1795 Pennsylvania, York County. Material: wood (maple), steel, iron, brass, silver. Total length: 153 cm. Barrel length: 115,3 cm. Caliber: 12,7 mm. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

In his book, The Kentucky Rifle, Captain John G. W. Dillin wrote the following about it:

“From a flat block of soft iron, hand-forged into the barrel of a gun; carefully drilled and cut with rough tools; equipped with a stock carved from a maple tree in the neighboring forest; and provided with a lock, forged to shape on an anvil; an unknown blacksmith in a long-forgotten workshop forged a rifle that changed the entire course of the world stories; made the settlement of the continent possible; and ultimately liberated our country from foreign domination.

Light in weight; graceful in formation; economical in the consumption of gunpowder and lead; deadly accurate; clearly American; she immediately gained popularity; and for a hundred years the model was often slightly varied, but never radically changed.”

Well, she got her nickname “Kentucky Rifle” in honor of the popular song “Kentucky Hunters”, dedicated to the victory at the Battle of New Orleans during the war with England in 1812.

As noted here, the smaller caliber*** required less lead per shot, which reduced the weight the shooter had to carry; a longer barrel gave the black powder more time to burn, which also increased the muzzle velocity and accuracy of the shot.

As a result, the accuracy of shooting from the Kentucky was simply fabulous for those times: at shooting competitions, trappers at a distance of 150–200 meters from this rifle could easily cut off the head of a turkey with a bullet! A typical rifle of this design had a 42-inch (1 mm) to 100-inch (46 mm) barrel, .1 caliber (200 mm) and a curly maple stock that went all the way to the end of the barrel. The butt was shaped like a crescent.

From an artistic point of view, the "long rifle" is known for its elegant stock, often made of curly maple, with its elaborate decoration, decorative inlays and a built-in bullet and wad case with a securely locking brass lid, and was one of the most beautiful examples of firearms of the 18th century. – beginning of the 19th century.

A rule of thumb used by some gunsmiths was to make the rifle no longer than the customer's chin so that he could see the muzzle while loading, especially since a long barrel allowed for better aim. It is therefore not surprising that by the 1750s it was common to see frontiersmen armed with just such rifles.

By the way, it was at that time in 1755 that the “long rifle” passed its first test in battle with the regular army. Then 400 settlers, armed with these rifles, attacked the French fort Duquesne on the Monongahela River. The French lined up in battle formation, but... only they had no one to fight with, since the enemy was not visible, and only bullets, arriving from somewhere unknown, mowed down the French soldiers one after another. Volleys fired into the forest yielded nothing, since the French bullets simply did not reach the settlers holed up in it.

As a result, practically without losses (7 were wounded, one himself broke his leg), the detachment calmly returned back.


Indian and white hunter with Kentucky Rifle. Illustration from J. Fenimore Cooper's novel The Prairie. State Publishing House of Children's Literature, Moscow, 1962.

In Pennsylvania, the earliest gunsmiths known to have produced long rifles were Robert Baker and Martin Meylin, who began production in 1729.

There is also documentation that the first high-quality long rifles were made by a gunsmith named Jacob Dickert, who moved with his family from Germany to Berks County, Pennsylvania in 1740. Moreover, the name “Dickert Rifle” became its “trademark” over time.

They were produced in ever-increasing quantities, so that by 1750 it was common to meet a border resident with just such a rifle.

In 1792, the US Army shortened its barrel length to create the Model 1803, which became known as the "Plains Rifle." Originally a very simple long rifle, by the 1770s they began to decorate with applied and embedded parts made of brass and silver, and also cover metal surfaces with engraving. Flintlocks were usually purchased in bulk in England, but gradually they began to be produced in the colonial states themselves.

During the Revolutionary War (1776–1789), it turned out that American militia, being out of range of the British Brown Bess smoothbore musket, successfully hit individual British soldiers and officers from a great distance. George Washington was very glad that his men were armed with Pennsylvania rifles, although most soldiers still used the musket because it was much easier and faster to load in battle.

But an American sniper with his long rifle could easily shoot the British general, who thought he was safe because he was far enough from the battlefield. The English generals were indignant that the uncouth American border guards, wearing shirts that hung down to their knees, shot at patrolmen and officers from extremely long distances.

In this regard, one of the generals ordered the capture of such a shooter in order to look at his weapon. The raiding party brought in Corporal Walter Crouse from York County, Pennsylvania, with his “long rifle.” And this is where the British made a serious psychological mistake by not fully thinking through the consequences of their next step.

And this is what they did: they sent the captured shooter to London.

And there, Krause, who was ordered to demonstrate his remarkable weapon in public, began to hit targets every day at a distance of 200 yards, which was four times the practical range of a smoothbore military shotgun of that time.

It turned out that this was bad PR, as the story goes that recruitment immediately stopped following these demonstrations, and King George III was forced to hire Hessian marksmen to fight the American sharpshooters. Then, by the way, she was also nicknamed “the widowmaker”!


When cap locks came into use, “Kentucky rifles” with cap locks also appeared. Photo of Rock Island Auction Company

True, in a situation where hand-to-hand combat could occur, the “long rifle” turned out to be too fragile to be used as a club. A blow to a hard object, such as someone's head, could easily result in the stock breaking. The long, thin wrought iron barrel was relatively soft and could bend easily.

The Americans knew about this and tried not to damage their main hunting weapon. In battle, reloading a Kentucky rifle also took twice as long as reloading a Brown Bess musket.

In addition, due to the length of the barrel, the shooter almost always had to stand up to carefully measure the powder and load the bullet. Therefore, it is not surprising that the Pennsylvania riflemen, for example, hid behind trees so as not to expose themselves to the danger of being hit by enemy fire, and the tactics of that time did not at all approve of this behavior of soldiers.

Therefore, it is not surprising that the main weapon during the revolutionary war on both sides was the Bran Bess smoothbore musket, as, indeed, in the war against Napoleon. And only less than 10% of American soldiers carried long rifles. However, this was enough for everyone to see the undeniable benefits of rifled weapons in the army!

*This rifle had several names, and the name depended on where it was used. But no matter what it was called, the Kentucky Rifle, the Southern Poor Man's Rifle, or the Tennessee Rifle, many of them were made in Lancaster, Pennsylvania.

**This is exactly the gun that the legendary Nathaniel Bumppo, the hero of the Leatherstocking novel series by the American writer James Fenimore Cooper, owned.” They say that Bumpo hunted and fought with a gun with an unusually long barrel. He received this weapon as a gift from Judith Hutter in the novel "Deer Killer", and the Indians call it "Long Carbine", which seems to indicate its rifled barrel, and the hunter himself calls it "Deer Killer" and does not mention anywhere that it rifled. However, judging by the fact that he loads it with a bullet with a soft leather patch, it can be assumed that this “deer-killer” could well be a German hunting rifle with straight rifling. Just the same ones that were used at the beginning of the 17th–18th centuries.

***The calibers of the Kentucky Rifle ranged from .50 to .40 (12,7 to 10 mm), and sometimes even .38 (9 mm). But they were all smaller than the army ones.
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    27 January 2024 06: 04
    Beautiful story, thanks to the author.
  2. +4
    27 January 2024 06: 37
    Quote: Vyacheslav Shpakovsky

    Therefore, it is not surprising that the Pennsylvania riflemen, for example, hid behind trees so as not to expose themselves to the danger of being hit by enemy fire, and the tactics of that time did not approve of this behavior of soldiers at all

    The tactics of loose formation and hiding behind trees and bushes did not at all correspond to the rules of military art of that time. It was believed that the soldiers had to go at each other, like wall to wall. American independence fighters broke this idea. By the way, the Hessian mercenaries, after the war of liberation, were not subjected to any repression. They received land from the government and farmed peacefully for themselves.
    1. +10
      27 January 2024 07: 23
      It was believed that the soldiers had to go at each other, like wall to wall. American independence fighters broke this idea.

      Actually, the Americans didn’t break anything. By this time, Europe had already come to this, the creation of light infantry units, the prototype of sniping.
      In America it went by itself because... The overwhelming majority of the population lived by hunting, and accordingly had shooting and camouflage skills. Well, it was practically impossible to build them in columns at first. They naturally turned war into hunting.
      1. +6
        27 January 2024 07: 31
        Quote: Arkadich
        In America it went by itself because... the overwhelming majority of the population lived by hunting, and accordingly had shooting and camouflage skills

        Exactly! And they didn’t know how to organize themselves into formations. Wrong breed wink
    2. +3
      27 January 2024 14: 21
      Okay, let's take an ordinary soldier of the 1800 model, hide him behind the trees, and then pull him out into formation. Then you won’t be able to collect them without shouting and kicking. For such exploits, without any quotation marks, officers were given orders.
      1. +4
        27 January 2024 19: 47
        That’s right, that’s why at Borodino, General Tuchkov’s corps stood under artillery fire for several hours. The regulations did not allow us to lie down or sit down.
    3. +4
      27 January 2024 17: 16
      Quote: Dutchman Michel
      It was believed that the soldiers had to go at each other, like wall to wall.
      If you don’t march in close ranks, you won’t have time to stand in square when the cavalry attacks and the unit will simply be cut to pieces. Therefore, the line infantry marched in columns under fire, and only a few rangers fought in scattered numbers. But yes, there was still a lot of show-off and foolishness, for example, some believed that the soldiers were “stupid” to lie down to wait out the cannon salvo. By the way, this is where the manic desire to increase the lethal range without paying attention to the real target range came from: it was necessary to somehow take out the artillery servants, because artillery fire was extremely dangerous.
      1. +3
        27 January 2024 19: 23
        Quote: bk0010
        Therefore, the line infantry marched in columns under fire, and only a few rangers fought in scattered numbers.

        Line infantry never marched in columns under fire. That's why the name is linear... They advanced to the battlefield in columns, at a distance of about 1.5 km (beyond the accuracy of cannonballs) the column deployed in a line. For line infantry these are three rows, about a meter to the neighbor on the right, for rangers two rows, approximately 1.5-2 meters. Three rows - because hand-to-hand combat remained the main thing. They fired once and forward, at the bayonet point!
        1. +1
          27 January 2024 22: 22
          Quote: Saxahorse
          Line infantry never marched in columns under fire.
          I went. Before the battle, yes, they turned around, and even then not always. Take an interest, for example, in the actions of the French line infantry under Napoleon in a number of battles. They walked in a column under fire, after which they began hand-to-hand combat.
          1. 0
            28 January 2024 20: 46
            Quote: bk0010
            They walked in a column under fire, after which they began hand-to-hand combat.

            The same phrase belongs to Napoleon:
            “The infantry has no chance of running a thousand steps to the battery” (c)
      2. +4
        27 January 2024 21: 25
        Actually, this is simply an archer tactic adapted to firearms. The lack of accuracy was compensated for by the density of fire, in one gulp - “maybe someone will hit.” And several rows of shooters were allowed to shoot while others reloaded for the same purpose. Modern rifles for “old” ammunition show how much less the AIMING range is than the flight range of a bullet.
  3. +2
    27 January 2024 06: 55
    Vyacheslav, thank you, I knew for sure that the St. John’s wort gun was not the same as everyone else’s, but now it’s clear... Such a delight in the morning hi
    1. +3
      27 January 2024 07: 55
      Quote: novel xnumx
      Such a beauty in the morning

      Glad you liked it! Since childhood - exactly half a century - I have puzzled over this. And now I was honored only in my seventh decade to find out.
  4. +4
    27 January 2024 08: 13
    200m? In the movies, St. John's wort shot much further)). That way he won't have time to shoot a second time
    1. +6
      27 January 2024 09: 28
      “from Kentucky was simply fabulous for those times: at shooting competitions, trappers at a distance of 150–200 meters easily cut off the head of a turkey with a bullet from this rifle!”
      Actually, a turkey is a bird, hitting a bird’s head 200m away with a rifle means that you need a rifle with an accuracy of about 0.5 minutes, let’s not even talk about the presence of optics.
      1. +6
        27 January 2024 09: 32
        Yes, I don’t mind, but if 2-3 turkeys with tomahawks are running/jumping towards you, then you can’t shoot more than one
  5. +10
    27 January 2024 09: 59
    it can be assumed that this “deer-killer” could well be a German hunting rifle with straight rifling. Just the same ones that were used at the beginning of the 17th–18th centuries.
    Straight rifling did not increase the firing range! Such rifling was not made for this purpose, but for a different purpose due to the “petty” property of black powder to “clog” the barrels with soot... And rifled barrels “began to increase” the firing range from that time on, as for cutting straight (!) rifling in the barrel was taken by a “crooked” gunsmith (or maybe his apprentice...)! Therefore, it is unlikely that Fenimore Cooper’s hero, famous for his marksmanship and long-range (!) shooting, used a “German rifle with straight rifling”!
    1. +3
      27 January 2024 15: 43
      Therefore, it is unlikely that Fenimore Cooper’s hero, famous for his marksmanship and long-range (!) shooting, used a “German rifle with straight rifling”!

      Definitely didn't use it. Nathaniel Bumpo "according to Cooper" was born in 1726 - 1727. By this time, German fittings had a full-fledged rifled barrel.
      In the photo - a flint hunting fitting of the Viennese gunsmith Caspar Zellner - 1730. Caliber - 14 mm. Seven left-hand rifling. Twist - 30 inches.
  6. +7
    27 January 2024 10: 21
    In Pennsylvania, the earliest gunsmiths known to have produced long rifles were Robert Baker and Martin Meylin, who began production in 1729.

    There is also documentation that the first high-quality long rifles were made by a gunsmith named Jacob Dickert, who moved with his family from Germany to Berks County, Pennsylvania in 1740. Moreover, the name “Dickert Rifle” became its “trademark” over time.

    This place is worth covering in more detail. The fact is that if no questions arise regarding Jacob Dickert and his rifles, then the authorship of the others in the creation of a long rifle raises great doubts, since there is not a single long rifle about which it could be said that it was made by Baker or Meiling no.
    Robert Baker was indeed one of the first gunsmiths in Pennsylvania and had a machine for drilling barrels, but there is no evidence of the manufacture of long rifles.
    As for Meiling, the question is much more interesting. Firstly, there were three Martin Meilins - father, son and grandson. In the literature, to avoid confusion, son and grandson are designated Martin Mylin (II) and Martin Mylin (III). All of them were blacksmiths; even a building built in 1719, the Mylin Gun Shop, has been preserved. It is possible that the gunsmith was Martin Mylin (II). But there is no real evidence of their manufacture of long rifles, much less the invention of these rifles. The rifle, which had been in the Meiling family for seven generations and was allegedly made by Meiling's father, was examined in 2005. The barrel turned out to be European, and the “MM” stamp was fake.
    Therefore, the “sure countdown” of the history of long rifle manufacturing in Pennsylvania in the literature begins with Jacob Dickert. His rifle is in the photo.
  7. +13
    27 January 2024 10: 30
    From an artistic point of view, the "long rifle" is known for its elegant stock, often made of curly maple, with its ornate decoration

    If suddenly someone wants to order such a stock for themselves, then the tree is called sugar maple. And "curly maple" is the name for the wood grain of the sugar maple tree. The bird's eye and wavy maple textures are also appreciated.
    1. +4
      27 January 2024 10: 59
      Quote: Dekabrist
      The bird's eye and wavy maple textures are also appreciated.

      +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    2. +6
      27 January 2024 16: 47
      Quote: Dekabrist
      And "curly maple" is the name for the wood grain of the sugar maple tree.

      Thank you so much! Otherwise I’m looking at “curly maple” and I don’t understand what it is! fool
  8. +4
    27 January 2024 15: 32
    Ah, Vyacheslav Olegich, dear!
    Thank you this weekend for another literary and pleasant excursion into the history of weapons. And what weapons! Covered with glory both on the battlefield and in skirmishes on the Frontier, both in the hands of the legendary historical adventure classic Natty Bumppo, and in the hands of real trappers, both in the service of militia volunteers and government “Indian agents”.
    PS
    I traditionally don’t touch upon detailed factual information because I’m never a researcher myself. But I cannot help but note the significance of your works as science and popularization of the history of weapons, military affairs, military culture and related topics - which is an excellent entry point for neophytes and the masses and subsequent delving into deeper and more serious academic materials of interest.
    From SW. hi
    P.P.S
    I’m reading this topic and listening in the background to the absolutely amazing soundtrack by Trevor Jones & Randy Edelman for the Oscar-winning film The Last of the Mohicans (1992). It gives me goosebumps.
    Separately - on this wave - I recommend the absolutely fantastic album of the vocal-instrumental group of ethnic Americans from the group Mohicans "Deep spirit Of Native American - Special Edition" (2006), namely, and specifically the track "Mohicans Vol.1 - 03. Mohicans - Main Title from The Last of the Mohicans)". This is a surprisingly complete, sometimes militant, sometimes achingly sad theme... Anyone who has seen the film will never get rid of the desire to feel the elastic air of freedom, to hear this pain, anger and tenderness once again.
    A short introductory excerpt can be heard here: [media=https://music.apple.com/ru/album/mohicans-music-inspired-by-the-deep-spirit-of/1532907915]
  9. Lad
    +2
    27 January 2024 15: 37
    The butts in the photos of “sniper” rifles hurt the eyes a little. The rifles in the photo have a very strongly inclined butt, which they are now trying to avoid as it leads to barrel toss and a decrease in accuracy. Perhaps they didn’t understand this then.
    1. +7
      27 January 2024 16: 03
      Do not forget the fact that these units worked on good old black (i.e., smoky) gunpowder, multiplied by the mass of the barrel itself and the accelerated bullet. As a consequence, slow and more deflagration rather than detonation combustion (when the front of chemical transformations is ahead of the actual expanding heat wave), and a subsonic bullet, visually and perceptually stretching the recoil, to the point that the bullet has time to leave the barrel before you will feel a soft and dull push on your shoulder.
      In 2008, at a shooting festival with relatives in the States, I had the opportunity to shoot from a flintlock long-barreled gun - not a “Kentucky”, I won’t lie, it was a modern replica, and in my opinion it was a “Virginia”, but in the authenticity of the materials and the chemical composition of the propellant, you can rest assured. So, comparisons with modern rifles, with their jacketed bullets with a heavy core developing supersonic speed at the exit and a corresponding reactive impulse in the perpendicular direction (breech, shoulder), with modern gunpowders with supersonic explosive combustion and, as a result, sharp and harsh recoil (the same , with the barrel jumping) just none. The level of energy, both in joules and in calories, is fundamentally different, as are the materials, as well as the masses and lengths of the barrels, and the inertial moment, and friction, and obturation, etc.
      From SW. hi
      1. -1
        27 January 2024 19: 31
        Quote: Raphael_83
        As a consequence, slow and more deflagration rather than detonation combustion (when the front of chemical transformations is ahead of the actual expanding thermal wave), and a subsonic bullet, visually and sensationally stretching the recoil, to the point that the bullet has time to leave the barrel before you will feel a soft and dull push on your shoulder.

        Sorry, but you're delusional. Black powder detonation is simply a barrel rupture, but black powder is much more prone to detonation than modern smokeless powders. Perhaps you were simply given a minimum amount of charge so that the bullet would fall out of the barrel cleanly.. wassat
  10. +1
    27 January 2024 18: 49
    The long, thin wrought iron barrel was relatively soft and could bend easily. The Americans knew about this and tried not to damage their main hunting weapon.

    In general, in theory, any barrel should be protected from impacts. As a child, my father told me about the method of straightening a barrel using a lamp and an oak block. He was probably taught this at the Tula Armory School.
    1. +2
      27 January 2024 19: 35
      Rifles with a long barrel were not only in America, and in the Caucasus something similar could be found, and not only in the Caucasus, of course Kentucky appeared earlier, but it is a child compared to the muzzle-loading rifle, Whitworth from 1858. There is a known case of a battle in 1864 when some general inspired his soldiers that it was impossible to hit beyond 800-1000 yards (650-910m), but a bullet from a Whitworth rifle refuted his words and hit him in the face, although it had an optical sight.
      1. +1
        27 January 2024 23: 26
        but it is a child compared to the muzzle-loading rifle, Whitworth from 1858.

        And compared to the Barrett M82, it’s not a weapon at all.
        You are comparing incomparable things.
  11. +2
    27 January 2024 19: 41
    the smaller caliber*** required less lead per shot, which reduced the weight the shooter had to carry; a longer barrel gave the black powder more time to burn, which also increased the muzzle velocity and accuracy of the shot.

    Unfortunately, the author is mistaken in this place. A longer barrel did nothing for the black powder except for a slight increase in accuracy. Black powder is characterized by an extremely high burning rate, on the verge of detonation. Therefore, the barrels of guns firing black powder were usually limited to a length of 20-23 calibers; longer did not make sense because the gunpowder obviously burned out and the projectile no longer accelerates but decelerates in the barrel. With the advent of brown powder, gun barrels lengthened to 30-35 calibers.

    In general, the Kentucky rifle is an ordinary hunting rifle of a relatively small caliber. A long barrel gave additional accuracy, but reduced power. Don't forget that the bullet was round! In weight and energy approximately equal to a bullet from a Makarov pistol. In general, it’s certainly possible to get within 200 yards, but to kill... it’s far from certain that the overcoat will pierce.
    1. 0
      27 January 2024 20: 36
      Quote: Saxahorse
      A long barrel gave additional accuracy, but reduced power.

      It is more logical to first find out the benefit from increasing accuracy, because instead of bullets, the trapper shooter bears the weight of an elongated barrel. Compare statistics for long and conventional hunting weapons of those times.
      Hunters did not always need power, especially if they were extracting furs - there were no mammoths anymore and elephant killers were not needed to extract furs, unlike precision small-caliber ones.
    2. +1
      29 January 2024 09: 14
      Beavers and American white-tailed deer are hardly large, robust game. In war, given that antibiotics had not been invented, even a 12-mm ball into the intestines guaranteed death from infection. Nowadays a black man with five holes can be patched up and released, but back then any injury was much more dangerous.
      As for accuracy, I strongly suspect that a very long barrel increased accuracy by reducing muzzle pressure.
      1. 0
        29 January 2024 21: 13
        Quote: eule
        Beavers and American white-tailed deer are hardly large, robust game. In war, given that antibiotics had not been invented, even a 12-mm ball into the intestines guaranteed death from infection.

        There is even a smaller caliber, they wrote something about 10-11 mm in Kentucky. And black powder is three times weaker than smokeless powder. Therefore, at 100 meters it’s enough to shoot a roe deer, but at 200 meters, it’s not a fact that you can kill someone larger than a hare. It just won't penetrate the skin. That’s why I doubted the use of such a thing as a spike gun, it’s painful to get close to the enemy. But Kentucky is good with accuracy, this is especially important for fur harvesting, so that the beaver doesn’t hit anywhere but hit in the head, preferably even in the eye wink
        1. 0
          29 January 2024 21: 22
          so as not to hit the beaver anywhere but in the head,

          By the way, this fitting did not have a front sight. Here, God forbid, I get within 50 meters.
  12. 0
    27 January 2024 19: 52
    For example, the so-called Little Ice Age, a time of global relative cooling on Earth during the 14th–19th centuries, caused a demand for cloth (and the development of cloth making in Europe) and an increased demand for furs, and in particular for beaver pelts.


    In fact, it was possible to satisfy the demand for fabric if a little more attention was paid to applied science.
    Viscose, obtained from wood, appeared in 1844, and could have appeared in everyday use back in the era of great geographical discoveries. The sails of caravels and galleons, in this case, would be woven from viscose and impregnated with resins.
    1. +1
      27 January 2024 21: 29
      The demand is not just for fabric, but for warm fabric. Cloth is a woolen fabric with a felted (turned into felt) top layer.
      1. 0
        27 January 2024 22: 07
        Quote from Avis
        The demand is not just for fabric, but for warm fabric

        Faux fur is made from viscose and the heat-retaining ability of the fabric depends on its production technology. You can get cold silk-like fabric, warmer felt-like fabric, and even make an artificial fur coat. Since viscose is not a scarce material at all, it is more advisable to make fur-like fabrics for winter.
        1. 0
          28 January 2024 10: 02
          Quote: Dekabrist
          And compared to the Barrett M82, it’s not a weapon at all.
          You are comparing incomparable things.

          The Kentucky rifle and the Whitworth rifle and the other were muzzle-loading, that is, they were both ramrod and used black powder, although the first was with a flintlock, and the second was capsule