US drones blur the edges

42
US drones blur the edges

History The emergence of unmanned aerial vehicles has several decades. They were used by American troops during the Vietnam War. In the time that has passed since Drones were greatly improved, and their new capabilities were demonstrated during the war in Lebanon in 1982. Then Israel managed to disable about two dozen batteries of anti-aircraft missile systems with the help of drones. It was then that the possibility of using unmanned aerial vehicles not only for reconnaissance, but also as a combat unit became obvious.

The first to understand this came the Americans, who began to actively develop and improve UAVs. The result of their work was the conduct of tests and the commissioning of the Predator and Global Hawk machines at the beginning of the 2000-s. Both of these drone can be in the air for a long period of time, while refueling they are not required. In addition, they can carry reconnaissance equipment and good weapons. The process of their production is not very expensive, because they are assembled from components and assemblies that are used in aircraft. The most modern models are armed with rockets.



In addition to the United States of America, Israel has achieved great success in terms of development and the use of drones.

Many experts call among the advantages of devices of this type the fact that human participation is completely excluded in their management, so they can withstand large overloads and not depend on the psychological or physical condition of the pilot.

In the United States, drones are actively developing. Moreover, it should be noted that the President of the country B.Obama not only continued the implementation of the program, but also greatly accelerated its pace and expanded the list of targeted applications. And for an ordinary American resident, it became familiar to see reports on the use of UAVs in Yemen, Pakistan and Somalia.

At the same time, the main enemy of Americans - Al-Qaeda is at the stage of mutation and radicalization. Its combat units are becoming the main source of terrorist threat. And in order to overcome them, it may be necessary to use unmanned vehicles over large African spaces. But it should not be forgotten that drones are not as invulnerable as they appear at first glance. And if certain technical tools and skills are available, they can be fairly easily intercepted or considered necessary information. So, in particular, several years ago, information appeared that militants got access to video records from UAVs, because secret frames are transmitted openly, without using any ciphers. It must be said that the American military leadership was well aware of this lack of UAVs, but stubbornly did not pay attention to it. The situation changed a little when, in 2007, records from the drones were found on the computers of Iraqi Shiite militants. Moreover, it became known that the militants managed to intercept information using low-cost programs. The Pentagon hastened to assure the public that in the near future, these shortcomings will be eliminated by equipping the robotic devices with new transceivers with data coding and communication protocols that will exclude the possibility of intercepting information. As a result, only about 30-50 percent of American UAVs use fully classified information transfer. According to experts, to install such equipment on all UAVs, time is needed, so at the moment this equipment is used only on those machines that work abroad.

But information insecurity is far from the only drawback of UAVs. In the spring of 2011, the drone, which was located on the American military base in Africa, launched the engine without human intervention as a result of some unknown software failure. In Las Vegas, a virus was detected in the boardless computers on board computers, and it took more than one week to eliminate. In addition, any unmanned robotic vehicle that is controlled by GPS navigation can be intercepted. To do this, according to experts, is quite simple - you just need to disorient it in space by creating noise and suppressing GPS signals.

In addition, despite all their ultra-modern stuffing, unmanned aerial vehicle is not a robot that is programmed to work independently. All these devices are controlled by people who tend to make mistakes. So, for example, in the spring of 2010, one of the American UAVs crashed, after the pilots who drove the vehicle for 8 hours from America transferred control to another team that was supposed to land the UAV. This second team did not check the sensor readings, and in fact they showed the difference of the order of 100-120 meters. It should be noted that the group included experienced pilots who have more than one thousand hours of UAV control.



However, America - this is not the only country that is engaged in the development and manufacture of UAVs. To put it mildly, a new UAV made in China became an unpleasant surprise for Americans. It is called "Pterodactyl". The development of the Chinese device began 7 years ago, and in the fall of 2007, the drone made its first flight. Since this is an export model, it is quite obvious that soon its owner will be China’s closest ally, North Korea. The Japanese are not very complimentary about the Chinese development, saying that it has a very weak engine. However, the Chinese have denied such information by demonstrating a commercial in which their drone can easily destroy a large ship.

In addition to the United States and China, the development of UAVs engaged England, Japan, South Korea. Russia has also repeatedly stated its intention to begin its own development of the drone. Its prototype was demonstrated at air shows, but the Russian leadership, for whatever reasons, made the decision to purchase drones in Israel.

With each new generation of UAVs, their tasks are becoming more voluminous. And now we are not talking about using UAVs for tactical reconnaissance. Now they are actually considering the possibility of using them as a weapon to kill people disagreeable with America around the world. In the print publications of the USA, there are reports about the success of using UAVs in Afghanistan, Pakistan and other countries. The word "success" Americans, as a rule, understand the destruction of a certain person who was included in the "black list". It should be noted that initially the information on the conduct of such operations was classified. About drones mentioned only in a few words. So, for example, in the middle of the first decade of 2000, information appeared in the press that the UAVs were used to fight terrorists after the terrorist attacks of 11 on September 2001 of the year. Then the amount of information increased slightly. The Los Angeles Times cited 19 cases of use of drones outside the state. And in 2012, journalists no longer stint on praise when American UAVs in Yemen were hitting the depots of the Al Qaeda terrorist organization. A few months later, in the same place, with the help of a drone, one of the leaders of the organization who was suspected of involvement in the destroyer Cole in 2000, was killed. But the Americans did not calm down on this: in the summer in Pakistan, with the help of the same UAVs, Abu Yahya al-Libi’s second man was killed in Al-Qaida. At the same time, the winners are not interested in how many civilians suffered from such actions. According to some reports, since the 2004 of the year, American drones killed about eight hundred people, attacking weddings and other completely peaceful events, mistakenly mistaking them for a militant gathering.



Thus, the Americans were able to prove to the whole world that they would stop at nothing, if only to destroy those whom they consider to be their enemies. And at the same time, it doesn’t matter to them at what point of the world these enemies are. American politicians themselves are confident that they are justly punishing criminals, but by and large this is more like contract killings, performed using the most modern technology. Moreover, some experts even claim that it was the devices of this type that served as the weapon for the assassination of Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in the 2005 year, although the Americans themselves disown it and accuse Damascus of everything.

In addition, there is even a version that among those planes that attacked the New York twin towers, there was at least one drone. This is evidenced by some eyewitnesses to the tragedy, who claim that they saw how one of the vehicles slowed down and corrected the flight trajectory before a collision with buildings ...

However, despite the success of American reconnaissance drones in the near future, it may soon be that their widespread distribution was in fact a great failure. Of course, drones are indispensable in the fight against terrorism, but their use has led to the fact that interstate deadly attacks as one of the main tools of national security have become the norm. The use of UAVs is growing at an accelerated pace along with America’s desire to intervene with the help of military force in the policies of other countries with the help of military force and with minimal risk for itself. The rest of the states are striving at all costs to keep up with the Americans.

However, it’s not worth talking about how the rest of the world cares about American drones in a businesslike manner in the airspace of Afghanistan and Pakistan. However, on the other hand, the presence of a UAV fleet can serve as another weighty argument in the “nuclear negotiations” with Russia. And if before Moscow threatened cruise missiles, now drones have been added to this. And in fact, if there was a scandal with the penetration of such an aircraft into foreign territory, it is practically impossible to prove that it belongs to some particular state: there is no pilot - there are no problems either.

To date, a specific program is being developed in Washington, a set of rules about what lethal attack by drones can be considered justified. But it seems that the United States has not fully understood the danger of using UAVs. After all, the war on terrorism today is being waged not only by Americans, but also by other countries. And it is quite possible that soon the world will witness a new arms race in the field of owning drones between America, China, Russia and India.

Materials used:
http://www.stoletie.ru/vzglyad/ptichki__ubijcy_126.htm
http://news.finance.ua/ru/~/2/0/all/2013/01/21/295154
http://oko-planet.su/politik/politiklist/119505-amerikanskie-bespilotniki-ubiycy-sposobstvuyut-rasprostraneniyu-terrora-the-guardian-velikobritaniya.html
http://www.yuggoth.ru/jenrof_shadanakara_v_mire/amerikanskie-bespilotniki-ubiytsyi.html
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    25 January 2013 08: 58
    Interesting article. But as always, there was a drop of delirium at the end.
    1. +5
      25 January 2013 10: 50
      The future is for drones, it’s obvious that the 6 generation aircraft will be unmanned, and I am sure that ground and underwater equipment will also become unmanned, so our government should pay more attention to this issue.
      1. Insurgent
        0
        25 January 2013 12: 56
        in 20 years can and will be
        1. 0
          25 January 2013 14: 07
          he could land in Washington with the delivery of a couple of tons of Tula gingerbread for the New Year ............... we all have, all the technologies, there is money and experienced scientists, there is no political will, like Soviet leadership
        2. +7
          25 January 2013 14: 13
          he could land in Washington with the delivery of a couple of tons of Tula gingerbread for the New Year ............... we all have, all the technologies, there is money and experienced scientists, there is no political will, like Soviet leadership
          1. Sleptsoff
            +2
            25 January 2013 16: 34
            Rogozin told you in Russian that we are 10-15 years behind in the UAV business, what technologies and scientists? A modern drone is crammed with electronics, all kinds of sensors, software also plays an important role, etc. And with microelectronics, it’s really sad, we can’t even make our own iPod, and you're talking about a drone: D
            1. +2
              26 January 2013 00: 24
              The coolest drone is our Buran! Adversaries to this still grow and grow.

              (who does not know, he landed from space in automatic mode, and the system itself decided and made a maneuver to extinguish excess speed)
              1. satellite
                +1
                26 January 2013 01: 00
                It's a pity you can’t put more pluses. About Buran it is clearly said smile
      2. denn
        +1
        25 January 2013 17: 58
        The trend is that cars will fight. Soon, surrogates will appear, which will replace the soldiers.
    2. +4
      25 January 2013 15: 19
      NATO drone shot down in eastern Afghanistan



      The press service of the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan reported the loss of a drone in Janheil County, eastern Paktia province near the border with Pakistan. According to NATO official information, the aircraft crashed. The causes of the incident and the type of UAV are not called.

      Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid said that the UAV was hit by the Mujahideen, caught fire and fell in the Surgar region on the evening of January 22.

      In December 2012 alone, two cases of the fall of NATO drones in Afghanistan were recorded. All losses were recognized by the ISAF command, the official reasons for the crash were "technical problems". On December 1, an unnamed American UAV crashed in the Zargun Shahar district of Paktika province. On December 11, a NATO drone crashed in Helmand province.

      In total, in 2012, the foreign contingent lost at least 5 unmanned aerial vehicles of various types in Afghanistan.
      1. +1
        25 January 2013 18: 27
        Sith Lord,

        The Chinese work .. as they once supported spirits ...
  2. +4
    25 January 2013 09: 03
    A new technique is needed, while we have it is poorly developed. And control systems and signal coding - this is the concern of specialists. Let them create protection. It is necessary to have powerful shock unmanned systems in service.
  3. Avenger711
    +4
    25 January 2013 09: 07
    A cruise missile is actually also a drone. All other drones are destroyed even easier.
  4. FID
    +7
    25 January 2013 09: 09
    And if you manage to reprogram the drone? Or take over control? Will he become some kind of Terminator? In general, "artificial intelligence" is a dangerous thing, especially in military affairs!
    1. 0
      25 January 2013 09: 27
      Quote: SSI

      And if you manage to reprogram the drone? Or take over control? Will he become some kind of Terminator? In general, "artificial intelligence" is a dangerous thing, especially in military affairs!

      And it seems to me, or a month ago, an article passed that the Iranians for the last two years stole an UAV from the 3 tan. And have you already cloned one model?
      1. 0
        25 January 2013 18: 04
        Quote: PROXOR
        And it seems to me, or a month ago, an article passed that the Iranians for the last two years stole an UAV from the 3 tan. And have you already cloned one model?

        It seems that cloning is a matter of a year or two. Imagine about the situation in the 90's you come across an iPhone in your hands --- clone. laughing
    2. 0
      25 January 2013 10: 00
      Hello Sergey! Tell me, do we have UAV engines that allow us to hang in the air for as long as the Amer’s?
      1. FID
        +3
        25 January 2013 11: 14
        And then anyone will do. Gasoline, electric ... They’re not reactive. Why give out your presence by the roar of a jet engine.
    3. Insurgent
      -2
      25 January 2013 12: 57
      But machines with no religions will have no ideologies
      1. Nevsky
        +1
        25 January 2013 15: 58
        Ideology will be. - technocratic)))))
    4. 0
      25 January 2013 18: 02
      Quote: SSI
      And if you manage to reprogram the drone? Or take over control? Will he become some kind of Terminator? In general, "artificial intelligence" is a dangerous thing, especially in military affairs!
      Everything is possible . and there is no absolute weapon, but the loss of one combat unit. still preferable to losing the same unit. but only with the pilot. Next, about GPS next year, Amer introduce an orientation system, probably with its stub there will be big problems.
  5. 0
    25 January 2013 09: 18
    America has always cared about its own security, and only, but who and how much and with what have been soaked - is secondary, for the time being. But these are complex software and hardware systems, and you can always expect a program crash, several hundred of these machines, along with other information computers and military equipment and hello doomsday.
    1. +4
      25 January 2013 09: 31
      Quote: Selendis

      America has always cared about its own security, and only, but who and how much and with what have been soaked - is secondary, for the time being. But these are complex software and hardware systems, and you can always expect a program crash, several hundred of these machines, along with other information computers and military equipment and hello doomsday.

      In general, for me it remains a mystery of the complexity of manufacturing UAVs. It’s not tricky to make a glider. We produce optical-vision systems. The main problem in my opinion remains precisely the brain filling and the hardware. You can’t push a simple laptop there. So here without external purchases anywhere. But here's the program: you forgive me, but we have so many young programmers in Russia. Well, is it really impossible to allocate a small compartment in ePuchiy Skolkovo where to put them and pay them for the UAV control program (surveillance and attack).
      1. +1
        25 January 2013 09: 58
        I think one of the problems with us is the efficiency of the engine, which allows it to hang for about 48 hours. But in this matter it is better to ask the pros of the SSI.
        1. +3
          25 January 2013 10: 08
          Quote: SrgSoap

          I think one of the problems with us is the efficiency of the engine, which allows it to hang for about 48 hours. But in this matter it is better to ask the pros of the SSI.

          Well, to begin with, there is nothing outstanding here either. They took the most ordinary piston, deformed. The shape of the straight wing allows him to hang for a very long time!
          1. 0
            25 January 2013 10: 14
            It depends on which UAV.
            1. +1
              25 January 2013 10: 31
              Quote: SrgSoap

              It depends on which UAV.

              Well, there are UAVs for deployment, but there are drums. There are drums. The same Global Hawk having a jet engine, is not able to hang in the sky for a long time. Its task is to quickly go to the desired area, make a separation, and if necessary destroy it. The pre-controller can hang for a long time, and also, if necessary, launch a missile, but this UAV must go to the desired area in advance. His engine does not allow him to develop high speed.
              1. 0
                25 January 2013 10: 55
                Thanks for the reminder, that was known. The issue is that engine efficiency has always been our weak point. And so you ++++
              2. Windbreak
                +1
                25 January 2013 11: 53
                Global Hawk is purely reconnaissance and has normal flight duration lenta.ru/news/2008/03/26/record/
      2. +1
        25 January 2013 12: 25
        Quote: PROXOR
        But here's the program: you forgive me, but we have so many young programmers in Russia. Well, is it really impossible to allocate a small compartment in ePuchiy Skolkovo where to put them and pay them for the UAV control program (surveillance and attack).

        Brains merge westward.
        Skolkovo -................................................ .................... not a literary language.
        KASPERSKY laboratory does not only work with viruses. (Is the hint clear?)
  6. 0
    25 January 2013 10: 10
    In any case, you have to do your own, it’s shameful to buy weapons from others, such as a country like Russia.
    1. -4
      25 January 2013 10: 24
      And wearing jeans is not shameful, because they started to rivet them in the states - can you switch to harem pants?
      http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81,_%D0%9B%D0%B8%
      D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%B9
  7. Kolovrat77
    0
    25 January 2013 11: 57
    Guys, explain why we don’t have our own, what is the problem?
    1. +3
      25 January 2013 12: 28
      The problem is that for 20 years they didn’t allocate money for the army, that’s the whole problem, and now, God forbid, replace the usual equipment. It’s just that if you invest in all the money, then you won’t get enough of it all, then again, Minister Taburetka was there, give him everything foreign.
      1. +2
        25 January 2013 15: 29
        I categorically agree with you, but .... drones are just the case when we need Western technology, in this topic we are very far behind, given our backlog in the electronics base, it’s completely impossible to catch a potential adversary in this topic. negative
    2. +1
      25 January 2013 12: 38
      There are our own, the problem is not in them, but in the approaches to them from our military leadership. TTX is invented by the developers themselves or stupidly copied from foreign ones. There is no doctrine, military science in a famous place there is no UAV !!!!
    3. BruderV
      0
      25 January 2013 17: 56
      Quote: Kolovrat77
      Guys, explain why we don’t have our own, what is the problem?

      The problem is simple. Glonass does not provide normal positioning on the battlefield, and for this reason no one needs to lose cars. When comparing with foreign ones, it was also found out that the characteristics of optics and electronics for detecting the enemy are unsatisfactory. That is, again, if you do not see anything from him at night or in the rain, then what for is he needed?
  8. +1
    25 January 2013 12: 43
    In my opinion, R. Sheckley had a story "Guardian Bird" for more than 20 years, where the consequences of robotization of weapons were very colorfully described ... So there is not much left before the riot of cars ...
  9. 0
    25 January 2013 12: 54
    But the USSR, at one time was a leader in this area, is a shame.
    1. +2
      25 January 2013 13: 43
      Undoubtedly, our main drone even flew into space and successfully landed. I'm talking about Buran now. Establish ammunition on it and the Pendian Predators will nervously rattle off to the side.
      Yes, they seized such a program ......... but the control system, probably can be used in modern realities, of course, taking into account the use of new materials, GLANAS, etc., it remains only to fit the material base (the aircraft itself ) and that’s it. The only question is they do not want at the top or are there no good engineers? The last thing is hard to believe. Give Novosibirsk money, he will give you such a thing that a century later they will still be putting into practice.
  10. AK-47
    0
    25 January 2013 14: 38
    ... "Traitor" and "Global Hawk." Both of these drones can be in the air for a long period of time, while refueling is not required.

    Is the perpetual motion machine already invented?
    Solar panels will not be able to provide UAV with enough energy.
  11. mnn_12
    +3
    25 January 2013 16: 42
    the main enemy of the Americans - Al Qaeda

    I don't understand how you can still live in Russia, people who sincerely believe that Al Qaeda is an enemy of the United States? In the Bible there was something like the text: "wake up with eyes and you will not see!"
  12. 5aa1
    +1
    25 January 2013 16: 49
    in perspective by 2020:
    1. S-500 is taken, American satellites are destroyed, GPS is disabled, the UAV is in a ballast state.
    2. A virus is made that can start the engine (it will be fun if it can also be stolen, for example :)) or completely disable UAVs, despite all the secrecy of the transmitted information, this is possible. as far as I know, from 2013 - most recently - operational hacker groups (correct) from the defense industry began to be created. and this is not only to protect their own information.

    the conclusion is this: for every Western trick, any Russian will find the simplest solution (2 times more effective). thanks to all.
    1. Windbreak
      +1
      25 January 2013 17: 43
      Quote: 5aa1
      1. C-500 is taken, American satellites are destroyed, GPS is disabled
      The S-500 can only shoot down low-orbit satellites. GPS satellites in orbit with an altitude of 20200 km are not.
      1. 5aa1
        0
        25 January 2013 19: 24
        sorry, I didn’t know. I repent. :)
      2. Ronin201
        0
        28 January 2013 13: 44
        it’s possible to destroy 24 satellites even only those hanging over the database zone, any attempt will bring more than gain ...
    2. Ronin201
      0
      28 January 2013 13: 42
      5aa1

      A competent comment!))) EW + destruction of the GPS orbital constellation, and all the money invested in drones will simply be lost ...
  13. Natalia
    +3
    25 January 2013 17: 02
    In short, here is the future for cybernetics. First, there will be these UAVs in one country, then in two three. Everyone will even later, then there will be systems that will allow them to take control of enemy drones. Then it will be necessary to create protection systems against such viruses .... and so on, the higher the technology, the more new problems arise with it.

    Given the degree of development in this area in Russia, the Defense Ministry is likely to oppose UAVs in the near future, an asymmetric answer and a bet will be placed on air defense systems such as Shell S-1, S-400, too, should not be forgotten (if you suddenly need to destroy more long distance). And I must say the answer is not bad, because it is not necessary to rush to where there is no particular development yet, it is better to create what works best.
  14. Nechai
    0
    25 January 2013 17: 44
    Quote from Sleptsoff
    we can’t even make our own iPod, and you're talking about a drone: D

    Today, in the news on the central channels, watch the story - our students MAKE and OPERATE self-made drones. Clear business from what they find. MO is not yet up to them. Although their leader ensures that each student is READY, the drone operator is at least. And then he himself will write a program. They have TV cameras on a STABILIZED platform. There are flying, there are veils, which one you like! The guy laments - you’ll only get a taste, and already the discharge indicator starts to blink. These are such youthful techniques! The city administration supports and uses them in solving serious problems. Heat loss is determined in the housing and communal services with a thermal imager. Unactivated garbage dumps are being weighed - quality video, time, car number, driver’s face, the Ministry of Emergencies also works with the guys. Etc. So here it is ...
    Only the POLITICAL WILL of the rulers of "ours" is needed to deploy the production of their own "hardware" of power sources, etc. And not to copy what exists in the World, but their own developments! ALREADY surpassing the World level!
  15. +2
    25 January 2013 17: 47
    I can not pass by and not post:


    1. 0
      25 January 2013 19: 21
      The first video is cool, and FPS will mine fake, although I'm not sure. But it seems to me that this quadrator should take a blow back. Well, the explosions there are certainly everything for beauty) FPS is famous for this)
      1. BruderV
        0
        25 January 2013 21: 00
        Quote: viktorR
        The first video is cool, and FPS will mine fake, although I'm not sure

        I'm sure.
      2. +2
        25 January 2013 22: 07
        FPSRussia is a well-known YouTube channel with a demonstration of various types of weapons. Their only fake is a fake Russian accent by the host - such a trick. In general, their programs are first-class. Unfortunately, in the near future there will be no new ones as their person responsible for the purchase / rental of weapons was found dead on the 3 of January (of course, a firearm). While there is an investigation of new programs will not be.


        Regarding the first video. This is a significant event, the UAV network in question for the last 20 years is being created before our eyes. UAVs should not be large and expensive - they should be many and they must interact with each other.
        1. 0
          25 January 2013 23: 16
          "UAVs should not be large and expensive - there should be many of them and they should interact with each other."

          Good evening, professor.

          UAVs with firearms (and) weapons are already expensive.
          Either for reconnaissance or as a kamikaze, it’s rather a variant wallpaper in one.
          The interaction of the "flock" or "array", in this case, increases the likelihood of achieving the goal.
          1. +1
            26 January 2013 00: 07
            Regarding the second video dolls are undermined by pyrotechnics.
            The recoil after the shots is unreal - it (Quadrotor) should
            still to overturn on pitch - as-as shoulder of force
    2. +1
      25 January 2013 19: 46
      With this Prototype Quadrotor with Machine Gun, it would be necessary to increase the dimensions of the airframe 1,5-2 times, times the 2-2,5 thrust-weight ratio,
      so that maneuverability is at least half SAB Goblin 700 compliant. Flight duration - at least an hour.
      Interference-protected communication and telemetry channel within 5-6 km.
      The operator has a helmet on his head with an 3D screen (so as not to be distracted).


    3. Cossack23
      +1
      25 January 2013 23: 55
      stunned in a great time we live - to survive it wink
  16. Edgar
    0
    25 January 2013 18: 06
    tell me why the USSR did not develop drones?
  17. Nechai
    0
    25 January 2013 18: 38
    Quote: Edgar
    tell me why the USSR did not develop drones?

    How is it not involved? You’ll google it ... At that elemental base and the level of technological development, after a quarter of a century, it’s already counted .. Both the tactical link and the operational-tactical link were created and adopted, they began to arrive, BUT the disaster, her mother !!!
  18. Oleg Rosskiyy
    0
    25 January 2013 19: 22
    Many experts call among the advantages of devices of this type the fact that human participation is completely excluded in their management, so they can withstand large overloads and not depend on the psychological or physical condition of the pilot.
    And who then controls this innovative bucket?
  19. Dendi
    -1
    25 January 2013 19: 54
    Well, in Iran, they caught a couple of these, why not ask them to share technology? send our scientists to them, let them study! and they will have a faster process, and we will have a technological curtain will be ajar
    1. BruderV
      0
      25 January 2013 21: 05
      Quote: dendi
      and the technological curtain will be ajar to us

      Yes, there is no curtain. Already Turkey and Israel and China are doing these kerosene stoves; there is nothing super-technological there except for surveillance systems. The problem is that GLONASS does not fry and it is not clear whether they will bring it to mind or not. And the fact that we do not have our own optics and electronics (thermal imagers, NVDs) of the required quality.
  20. 0
    25 January 2013 20: 28
    Quote: Dante
    Yes, they seized such a program .......

    Yes, not a program, but a STATE!
  21. Cossack23
    0
    25 January 2013 23: 43
    It is lousy that computer phlegms will soon be at war, and they will forget about military honor, because it is alien to those who control drones.
  22. rubber_duck
    0
    26 January 2013 00: 47
    Quote from the article:

    At the same time, the main enemy of the Americans - Al-Qaeda is at the stage of mutation and radicalization. Its combat units are becoming a major source of terrorist threat. And in order to overcome them, it may be necessary to use unmanned vehicles over large African spaces.

    Code. Sapienti sat.