Post-war use of German cruise missiles

43
Post-war use of German cruise missiles

As you know, the leadership of the Third Reich in search of a “miracle” weapons“spent enormous resources on the development of missile technology, and after the surrender of Nazi Germany, the victorious countries received a rich inheritance. Of particular interest were cruise missiles, which were actively used at the final stage of the war and became the object of study and copying in a number of countries.

Creation of the Fieseler Fi 103 projectile aircraft


In the late 1930s, research began in Germany on the creation of unmanned projectile aircraft (flying bombs). According to the German designers, the aircraft, remotely controlled or equipped with an autopilot with a preset program, was supposed to deliver an explosive charge to an enemy target. At the first stage, two options were considered: a disposable projectile aircraft and a returnable unmanned bomber.



During the design work, it became clear that the existing remote control equipment at that time did not provide the required range. In addition, an unmanned aerial vehicle, equipped with a piston engine with a high degree of vulnerability to air defense systems, was comparable in cost to a manned aircraft, which, given the low accuracy of the autopilot with an inertial control system, made the combat use of such an aircraft-projectile unjustified.

The matter moved from a dead point after Argus Motoren brought its pulsating air-breathing engine (PuVRD) to an acceptable level. In 1941, it was tested on the ground by mounting the engine on a car, and then in flight on a Gotha 145 biplane. The engine was given the designation Argus AS 014. Cheap low-octane gasoline served as fuel for the PURD.


Argus As 014 Pulse Air Jet Engine

The Argus As 014 rocket engine was a cylindrical combustion chamber with a long cylindrical nozzle of smaller diameter. The front part of the chamber is connected to the inlet diffuser, through which air entered the chamber. Between the diffuser and the combustion chamber there is a plate air valve that operates under the influence of the pressure difference in the chamber and at the outlet of the diffuser: when the pressure in the diffuser exceeds the pressure in the chamber, the valve opens and allows air into the chamber. When the pressure ratio was reversed, the diffuser closed. Hot gases flowed through the open end of the pipe, creating jet thrust. The cycle repetition rate in the marching mode of operation was 47 times per second. For the primary ignition of the air-fuel mixture, the chamber had a spark plug, which produced a high-frequency series of electrical discharges.

Thanks to the presence of valves on the Argus As 014 grille, unlike a ramjet engine, constant high air pressure at the entrance to the pipe, blocking it from the “reverse exhaust”, was no longer required. It was enough just to start the engine - and the operating cycle was maintained by itself, using highly heated parts and residual hot gases to ignite the next portion of the air-fuel mixture.

By the standards of piston engines that existed at that time, the Argus As 014 engine, which developed thrust up to 300 kgf, was very voracious. Its wastefulness was clearly evidenced by the extensive torch “shooting” from the nozzle of the PuVRD - a consequence of incomplete combustion of the fuel in the chamber.


At the same time, the main advantage of the Argus As 014 over piston, turbojet and liquid jet engines was its very low cost and simplicity of design.

The creation of a projectile aircraft (in modern terminology - a cruise missile) was undertaken by the company Fieseler Flugzeugbau. The preliminary design, designated P-35, was ready in April 1942. After reviewing it, the Luftwaffe leadership included it in its Vulkan missile program and allocated funding, assigning the code designation Kirschkern - “Cherry Pit”. However, this aircraft is better known as Fi 103, and also Vergeltungswaffe-1(V-1) - “Weapon of Vengeance”. In Russian-language sources the name V-1 is often found.

Also involved in the project was Askania, which was responsible for the control system. To build a ground-based launcher, the company Rheinmetall-Borsig, which had extensive experience in designing artillery carriages, was hired.

The Fi 103 cruise missile, which had the simplest and cheapest design, was an aircraft with a mid-wing and a single-fin tail. The engine, about 3,2 meters long, was located above the fuselage and tail. Most of the airframe parts were made by stamping from a thin steel sheet, which made the production process cheaper and faster.

Fuel was supplied to the injectors by compressed air from spherical cylinders, which created excess pressure in the fuel tank, which displaced gasoline through a copper tube. There was enough fuel for 22 minutes of operation. Average fuel consumption was 2,35 l/km. Fuel tank capacity – up to 640 l.


A fairly simple control system was based on a magnetic compass, which controlled the course, and gyroscopes used to stabilize the rocket in roll and pitch. The flight altitude was determined by a barometric altimeter. The distance traveled was recorded by an odometer, which was rotated by a two-bladed impeller installed in the forward part of the fuselage. After 100 kilometers of the journey, the fuse was cocked, and after overcoming the given route, the odometer set the rocket's rudders to a dive and turned off the engine. In the event of a control system failure, the warhead was detonated by a clock mechanism two hours after launch.

The Fi 103 projectile had a length of 7,73 m. The wingspan was 5,3-5,7 m. The fuselage diameter was 0,85 m. The launch weight was 2180-2250 kg. The weight of the warhead was 700-850 kg. Typically, a high-explosive warhead was equipped with cheap ammotol (a mixture of TNT and ammonium nitrate). At the first stage of the flight, the speed was approximately 500 km/h. However, as fuel was used up and weight was reduced, it could reach 640 km/h. A number of sources say that the maximum speed of the Fi 103 reached 800 km/h. But, apparently, we are talking about the speed developed during a dive. The cruise missile could rise to a height of more than 2500 m. But, as a rule, the flight to the target was carried out in the altitude range of 800-1100 m. The flight range was more than 220 km.

The launch was carried out from a ground launcher or from a carrier aircraft. On a ground-based launcher, the rocket was mounted on a trolley, which accelerated to 400 km/h using a piston pushed by steam generated by the combination of concentrated hydrogen peroxide and potassium permanganate. Having taken off from the ground, the rocket separated from the cart and flew towards the target.


Fi 103 missile aircraft on a launcher

On December 24, 1942, the first launch took place from a ground installation, with the engine turned on. The launched rocket reached a speed of 500 km/h and, after flying about 8 km, fell into the sea.


In the summer of 1943, tests of the Fi 103 with a standard control system took place. It turned out that when firing at the maximum range and normal operation of all systems, the missile with a probability of 0,9 fell into a circle with a diameter of 10 km. This circular probable deviation made it possible to use the new weapon only against large area objects, which predetermined the choice of targets.

Production and combat use of Fieseler Fi 103


Serial production of the Fi 103 began in August 1943. Assembly was carried out at four factories: Nordhausen, Ham, South Fallersleben and Magdeburg-Schönebeck. Another 50 companies were involved in the production of components. Until March 1945, more than 25 cruise missiles were built.

200 launchers were deployed in northwestern France, 64 km from London. However, due to technical and organizational difficulties, the first 10 combat Fi 103s were launched on June 13, 1944. Five missiles fell immediately after launch, four failed en route to their target, and only one missile reached London. When it fell in the Toore Hamlets area, 6 people were killed and 9 were injured. In the first weeks, up to 40 missile launches were carried out daily; by the end of August, the number of missile attacks per day reached hundreds.

Some missiles were equipped with radio beacons, and their position was tracked by German direction finders, which made it possible to accurately determine the location of their fall and, based on the data obtained, make adjustments during subsequent launches.

Massive indiscriminate cruise missile fire in the first stage caused panic among the civilian population in major cities. In addition to London, Fi 103 attacked Portsmouth, Southampton, Manchester and a number of other British cities. According to available data, 2419 rockets reached London, killing 6184 people and injuring 17 and destroying or damaging some 981 buildings.


Fi 103 dives into central London, summer 1944

Missile attacks on Great Britain continued until March 29, 1945. The Germans also launched Fi 103 at targets in Belgium and France after the liberation of these territories by the Allies.

Since by the beginning of 1945, Allied troops occupied the French coast, making it impossible to launch cruise missiles from ground-based installations, the Luftwaffe command implemented an alternative plan and launched the Fi 103 from He 111 bombers.


Fi 103 cruise missile suspended under the wing of a He 111 aircraft

Aviation the “flying bomb” version had an increased firing range, achieved through the use of a lightweight warhead and a more capacious fuel tank. When dropped from a bomber, the Fi 103 cruise missile could travel more than 300 km.

A number of sources claim that the “long-range” Fi 103 was also launched from a ground launch position in the Netherlands. In total, about 300 missiles with an increased flight range were launched from the ground and air. Most of them were intercepted by British air defense forces.

To more effectively combat Fi 103, the British command deployed 1500 large-caliber anti-aircraft guns and 700 searchlight installations on the English Channel coast. The radar network has also been improved. “Flying bombs” that broke through this line fell into the range of fighter aircraft. A third line of defense was created in the immediate vicinity of the city - an air barrier of 2000 balloons. A post-war British report states that 7547 "flying bombs" entered English airspace. Of these, 1847 were shot down by fighters, 1866 were destroyed by anti-aircraft artillery, 232 were victims of barrage balloons, and 12 were shot down by anti-aircraft artillery from Royal Navy ships. fleet.

As is known from stories wars, bombing of residential areas and civilian infrastructure most often do not contribute to success on the line of combat contact. In the case of the Fi 103 and the ballistic Aggregat-4 (A-4 or V-2), which will be discussed in the next publication, the Nazis even achieved the opposite effect. The shelling of cities with cruise and ballistic missiles, after the initial shock had passed, contributed to the unity of the British nation and further motivated the soldiers to defeat the aggressor.

Fieseler Fi 103R Reichenberg manned cruise missile


When talking about the Fi 103 cruise missile, it is worth mentioning the manned version, which was not used in combat. The appearance of this modification, known as the Fi 103R Reichenberg, is associated with the inability of the basic “projectile aircraft” to hit point targets.

It was initially planned that the pilot would leave the cockpit with a parachute after hovering the Fi 103R, but it was later decided that the manned “aerial torpedo” should be controlled until it hit the target.


Fi 103R

The cruise missile was converted into a manned version by installing a pilot's cabin in the place where compressed air cylinders were located in the standard Fi 103. To maintain pressure in the fuel system, one cylinder was used, installed at the rear, in place of the autopilot. The fuselage was lengthened by 25 cm to create the necessary legroom for the pilot. During the alteration, the area of ​​the tail surface was also increased, and the controls were connected to the movable steering surfaces by cables. The elevators were supplemented with balancers. Ailerons of increased area appeared on the wings.


The cockpit was equipped with a minimal set of instruments and a plywood seat. The two-seat training variant featured a retractable landing ski similar to that used on the Me 163. Approximately 175 single and two-seat Fi 103Rs were built. Most of the manned “projectile aircraft” were manufactured in aircraft repair shops.

During the training of suicide pilots, many accidents and disasters occurred. This was due to the fact that the Fi 103 was not originally designed for repeated takeoffs and landings, and the design had a low safety margin. As a result, the program was considered unpromising, and it was closed in March 1945.


After the surrender of Germany, several Fi 103Rs were at the disposal of the Allies. Now two such aircraft are on museum display.

Post-war cruise missiles based on the Fi 103


In the USA, an attempt to copy the Fi 103 was made in 1944. To do this, the Americans asked the British for details of the crashed “flying bombs”. The development was entrusted to Republic Aviation Corp., whose specialists built a fairly successful copy that surpassed the original in a number of parameters.

The first American cruise missile had several names. In the Air Force it was listed as LTV-1, LTV-A-1 and LTV-N-2, in the Navy - KUW-1. This missile went down in history under the factory designation Republic JB-2 Loon.


The American Moon rocket was a little longer and had a larger wing area. One of the few visible differences between the JB-2 and the Fi 103 was the shape of the pulsejet engine's forward support pylon. The guidance and flight control systems were manufactured by the Jack and Heintz Company, Monsanto developed the launch system, and Northrop supplied the launch skid. The PJ31 pulsejet engine, built by the Ford Motor Company, had slightly more thrust than the original Argus As 014. Due to the parent company being overwhelmed with orders for P-47 Thunderbolts, the JB-2 airframes were produced handed over to a subcontractor - Willys-Overland. After the start of mass production, experts noted that the JB-2 missiles had much higher workmanship and weight perfection than the Fi 103.

A fully equipped JB-2 missile, equipped with a 910-kg warhead, weighed 2277,5 kg. The flight speed was 565-680 km/h. Firing range – 240 km.


Testing of the JB-2 began in October 1944 at the C-64 site, located in Florida, 35 km east of Eglin Airfield. During the first test launches, it turned out that copying a German cruise missile turned out to be easier than creating a launch complex for it that would ensure stable launches. Before a satisfactory result was achieved, nine launchers of various designs and lengths were tested.


Unlike the Germans, who used a catapult for launch, powered by superheated gas formed during the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide, the Americans used a much simpler and safer to use solid propellant rocket booster, which ensured acceleration of the rocket.

A total of 64 launches were made from the S-233 site. Tests were also conducted at a test site in Utah, located in the vicinity of the Wendover Field airbase. In addition to launches from ground-based launchers, the JB-2 was tested for air launch from a B-17 bomber, for which a test squadron was deployed at Eglin Air Force Base.


During testing, the JB-2 cruise missile confirmed its designed range and flight speed. However, the American military was categorically not satisfied with the accuracy of the shooting. In order to significantly reduce the probable circular deviation from the aiming point, it was decided to use radio command guidance with tracking using the SCR-584 radar and the AN/APW-1 radar guidance system.


Radar scr-xnumx

To facilitate missile tracking, there was a radio transmitter on board. Radar equipment for tracking and targeting could be located in a towed van, on a ship or on board an aircraft. After fine-tuning this system, when firing at a distance of 160 km, the probable circular deviation was 400 m, which made it possible to effectively strike railway stations, ports, large factories and warehouses.

In parallel with the testing of the radar guidance system, in the spring of 1945, the formation of missile squadrons began, which were planned to be used against Japan. As part of Operation Downfall, before the landing of American assault forces on the Japanese Islands, it was planned to conduct massive bombing and shelling of Japanese territory for 180 days, actively using “rocket bombs” in this. According to American plans, the total production of JB-2 was supposed to be 75 units, with a launch rate of 000 units per day from carrier aircraft and ships. Approximately 100 cruise missiles were supposed to be fired at Japanese targets immediately before the landings.

Japan surrendered much earlier than American military analysts predicted, and production of the JB-2 ceased on September 15, 1945. A total of 1391 copies were made.

After the end of World War II, “Lun” for some time was the only combat-ready guided missile in the US armed forces. In this regard, the JB-2 was actively tested, participated in various exercises and experiments, and also served as a flying laboratory for testing new guidance systems.

Air-launched missiles served as aerial targets for anti-aircraft and fighter training in the late 1940s. The first thermal homing heads were also tested on them.

After 1947, cruise missile launches continued from Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico, using the White Sands Missile Test Range. Test launches here continued until the second half of 1949.


Preparing the JB-2 cruise missile for test launch at Holloman AFB, May 1948

In the first post-war years, the JB-2 was planned to be used as a means of delivering a nuclear charge. However, due to the not very high technical reliability of the cruise missile, rapid physical and moral obsolescence, it was used only to test the control equipment and launch device used on the serial MGM-1 Matador cruise missile, equipped with a 50 kt nuclear warhead, which had, depending on modifications flight range from 400 to 950 km.

American admirals also became interested in the new missile weapons, and experimental launches of Lun missiles continued at Point Mugu airbase. Initially, they planned to arm cruisers and light aircraft carriers with cruise missiles. But subsequently the command of the US Navy decided that submarines were more promising carriers.

For this purpose, the rocket was modified, and on the submarine it was placed in a special waterproof container. The launch was carried out from the surface position, from a ramp installed in the stern.


Launch of a JB-2 cruise missile from the submarine USS Cusk SSG-348 in 1951

The missile was guided from the submarine USS Carbonero (SS-337), on which, in addition to radar equipment and a command transmitter, it was also planned to install a container and a missile launcher.

The fleet continued launching the JB-2 until September 1953. At the same time, control equipment, a new propulsion system and guidance techniques for remotely controlled vehicles were tested. The resulting developments were subsequently used on the SSM-N-8 Regulus naval cruise missile, which was equipped with nuclear warheads and could strike at ranges of up to 920 km.


Currently, several JB-2 cruise missiles are displayed in museums and erected as monuments.

In the Soviet Union, on the basis of Fi 103, the design bureau of plant No. 51 (future OKB-52) under the leadership of V. N. Chelomey created the 10X projectile aircraft. Pe-8 and Er-2 bombers were considered as its carriers.


10X Projectile

In its main characteristics, the 10X rocket differed little from the German prototype. With a launch weight of 2130 kg, the aircraft, equipped with an 800 kg warhead, had a maximum flight range of 240 km. Speed: 600-620 km/h.


Launch of 10X from a Pe-8 bomber

The first flight test of the 10X took place on March 20, 1945 at a test site near the city of Jizzakh in Uzbekistan.

In 1948, after comprehensive tests, the projectile was recommended for adoption by the Air Force. However, the military was not satisfied with the low accuracy of the inertial guidance system, and they refused to accept this missile for service. Air Force officials also pointed out that the 10X's low speed and altitude make it an easy target for fighter jets.

In 1951-1952 a ground-based launch complex with a 10ХН rocket was tested, which was equipped with a solid-fuel launch device and had a new guidance system, the creators of which promised to increase hit accuracy.


Launcher with ground-based cruise missile 10ХН

Without waiting for the end of the tests, the Smolensk Aviation Plant received the task of producing 50 10ХН cruise missiles, which were considered as training missiles and were to be used to train rocket scientists until more advanced models appeared.

To confirm the stated characteristics, in October 1956 it was decided to shoot six serial 10ХН. Due to errors in pre-launch preparation, the first launch was an emergency. In the summer of 1957, after modifications were made, control launches of five more 10XNs were carried out, of which four reached the specified area. At the same time, the average flight speed turned out to be 10-40 km/h lower than declared.

According to the commission, consisting of representatives of the Ministry of Defense and the State Committee on Aviation Technology, the 10ХН aircraft projectile did not meet the requirements for modern weapons and did not provide reliable operation over the entire temperature range. They decided to use serially built projectile aircraft as training targets in the air defense and air force systems.

A further development of the 10X family was the twin-engine projectile 16X. Its appearance is due to the fact that, according to calculations, the use of two pulsating air-breathing engines theoretically made it possible to approach a speed of 900 km/h.


16X Projectile

Since the military refused to adopt a cruise missile that had low hit accuracy, the modification 16ХА "Priboi" provided for the use of tele-guidance, in which at the final stage of the flight the on-board television camera was turned on and the image was broadcast via radio channel to the carrier aircraft, the operator found on his sight target and used radio commands to correct the missile’s flight.

The modernized 16ХА "Priboi" with two D-14-4 engines with a total thrust of 500 kgf had a starting weight of 2557 kg and carried a high-explosive warhead weighing 950 kg. Speed ​​– about 650 km/h. Range – 190 km. Launch altitude – 5000 m. Flight altitude in the main section – 800-1000 m.

Due to the lengthy development of the television guidance system, the first launch of a rocket with it took place on August 2, 1952. During testing, tele-guidance did not work reliably. Despite this, on October 15, 1952, the 16ХА was recommended for adoption. Having familiarized himself with the test materials, the Commander-in-Chief of Long-Range Aviation refused to accept the 16XA, citing the inadequacy of the television guidance equipment and the low flight speed. Due to the emergence of rockets with other types of engines that provided better speed and altitude characteristics, development of the 16XA was considered inappropriate and the topic was closed in February 1953.

A French drone based on the Fi 103 is known as the ARSAERO CT 10. This aircraft, designed by Arsenal de l'Aéronautique, had radio remote control. Thanks to the parachute landing method, it was possible to reuse it. The CT 10 was launched from a ground installation using powder accelerators.


Since the French ST 10 did not carry a warhead, it was much lighter and more compact. Its length was a little over 6 m, its wingspan was 4,3 m, and its launch weight was 670 kg. Maximum speed – 460 km/h. Flight range – 320 km. Maximum flight altitude is 4000 m.

Testing of the ST 10 began in 1949, and the UAV has been mass-produced by Nord Aviation since 1952. In total, more than 400 copies were built, which, in addition to the French Air Force, were used as aerial targets in Great Britain, Italy and Sweden until the second half of the 1960s.

In Sweden, after studying the wreckage of Fi 103 found in the country in 1944, they also decided to create their own “flying bomb”. In 1946, Saab AB began development of the Robot 310 (also known as Lufttorped 7) cruise missile.


Cruise missile Robot 310

The Robot 310 cruise missile was intended to be launched from combat aircraft at enemy targets from beyond the effective range of anti-aircraft artillery.

The Swedish rocket had a significantly redesigned layout compared to the Fi 103. The designers of Saab AB placed the PURD along the axis of the body, moving the air intake slots to the sides in the middle part of the fuselage. Due to this, they managed to significantly reduce the dimensions of the rocket.

The length of the hull, including the engine, was 4,73 m, the span of straight wings was 2,5 m. Weight was 265 kg (possibly without a warhead). Flight speed is about 670 km/h, with a firing range of 17 km.

About 1949 missiles were fired for testing in 200. But based on the results of military tests, the Robot 310 series was not launched. The characteristics of the missile were already clearly insufficient to guarantee the destruction of the target or at least the invulnerability of the carrier aircraft in the conditions of the use of jet interceptors and radar-guided anti-aircraft guns equipped with shells with radio fuses.

Продолжение следует ...
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    12 January 2024 03: 28
    A good overview of the V-1 and the post-war descendants of this cruise missile, definitely a “+”.
    As for the pulsating jet engine, it seems to me that its potential has not been exhausted, and the PuVRJ can still be used on kamikaze drones and aerial targets.
    1. +8
      12 January 2024 08: 30
      and PuVRD can now be used on kamikaze drones and aerial targets.
      I saw at the next MAKS, Kazan offered a target.
    2. +5
      12 January 2024 09: 14
      In fact, if you attach a GPS-based guidance system to this thing, even the one on bomb mopeds, the accuracy problem is solved. If instead of sheet steel you use plastic for the fuselage (not difficult), only the engine will be visible on the radar, and it is the size of a Grad. And if you manage to make a motor out of ceramics, then there will be practically nothing left to reflect, and you will get an inconspicuous high-precision weapon. And since, for a modern control system, large and heavy ball cylinders can be replaced with a small battery, the freed weight and volume can be used either for additional fuel (and accordingly increasing the range) or for additional explosives.
      Even if you launch just a couple or three per night, the ukroführer will get very sick.
      1. +3
        12 January 2024 17: 42
        Quote: Nagan
        If instead of sheet steel you use plastic for the fuselage (not difficult), only the engine will be visible on the radar, and it is the size of a Grad.

        If you install a normal altimeter, this megageranium at an altitude of 50-100 meters simply will not be noticed by radars. There, the question is rather how expensive it will be to launch the production of cheap, simple and mass-produced missiles in addition to complex and expensive X-SD/BD
        1. +1
          12 January 2024 20: 24
          Quote from alexoff
          If you install a normal altimeter, this megageranium at an altitude of 50-100 meters simply will not be noticed by radars.
          Well, let’s say, the MiG-29 will notice, and even more so the F-16, and in terms of guidance, any missile with a thermal head will gladly capture it. But at the same time, they will have to constantly keep a curtain of fighters in the air, and who will allow them?
          In principle, a MANPADS can easily take it from the ground. But if at low altitude, and even at night, then the operator will not have time to grab it with his head.
          Quote from alexoff
          The question is rather how expensive it will be to launch the production of cheap, simple and mass-produced missiles
          In terms of manufacturing costs, the original V-1 cost 5090 Reichsmarks, at that time (1944) $2036, in 2023 dollars a little more than $35000. Of course, manufacturing in the Russian Federation will differ, as will the components of the control system, but the guideline is approximately the same. How much does Caliber cost? So, offhand, it’s 10 times more, but carries almost half as much explosives. True, it flies further.
          1. +4
            12 January 2024 21: 04
            Quote: Nagan
            Well, let's say, the MiG-29 will notice, and the F-16 even more so

            Well, it’s clear that if it flies directly at the beech tree, they will also notice it. But it’s good that if we turn on our brains, we can notice the operation of the radars and shoot at the same fighter. Any weapon is imperfect, something will be knocked down, something will break on its own and fall into the field, somewhere the fuse may simply fail; in Kyiv the other day they dug up a penetrating warhead, which stupidly did not explode. Well, it’s a shame, of course, but how many shells miss their targets, and probably millions of rounds are shot into milk.
            Quote: Nagan
            So, offhand, it’s 10 times more, but carries almost half as much explosives. True, it flies further.

            It says here that the fuel did not burn enough in the engine, I think now everything can be adjusted normally, optimized, it will fly a couple of times further with approximately the same assembly. Or you can make additional tanks that can be replaced with TNT blocks, a ton of TNT to Dnepropetrovsk, half a ton to Lvov. And this is for the price, plus or minus, of a lancet or two geraniums. In general, the thing is, it’s a pity that our Defense Ministry doesn’t work like that, it doesn’t like a lot and it’s cheap, it likes an expensive experimental batch to spend 20 years, then be adopted into service, but not purchased
            1. +3
              12 January 2024 22: 49
              Quote from alexoff
              It says here that the fuel did not burn enough in the engine, I think now everything can be adjusted normally, optimized, it will fly a couple of times further with approximately the same assembly.

              I'm afraid that this is a congenital disease of PuVRD, and there is not much to gain from any adjustments. As for hanging tanks, you have to consider whether it will work. And the original wing was made of plywood with one steel pipe as a spar. If you make it out of plastic and sealed, then here is an additional volume into which you can pour gasoline.
              In principle, to produce such things “on the knee” by gluing the fuselage and wings from fiberglass in a volume of a couple of pieces a day, all it takes is a hangar and a dozen hard workers who really understand what they are doing, so “those who come in large numbers” are not suitable, and at least one of them has an engineering education. Well, the control system still needs to be made, although most likely it should come from Geranium with minimal modifications.
              1. 0
                13 January 2024 00: 25
                Quote: Nagan
                As for hanging tanks, you have to consider whether it will work.

                not suspended, in the sense that if you fly close, one fuel tank is unscrewed from the belly of the rocket, and in its place is a keg of TNT. Of course, at the factory, like in the X-38, they put another bomb in place of the engine and it becomes a glide bomb. Although, in principle, fuel also burns well if there is some unspent fuel left
                Quote: Nagan
                I'm afraid that this is a congenital disease of PuVRD, and there is not much to gain from any adjustments.

                I think you can win 15% there. here we change cast iron to aluminum, here we make the nozzle more scientifically based, there we make the valves more streamlined, and now we have a range of 400 km, if our father allows us to launch from his territory (before, it seems like they launched different things, maybe of course there was an agreement in the spring of 2022 and that’s all) then almost all of Ukraine is covered. And in a flock with geraniums send
    3. +4
      12 January 2024 14: 13
      Quote: Tucan
      As for the pulsating jet engine, it seems to me that its potential has not been exhausted, and the PuVRJ can still be used on kamikaze drones and aerial targets.

      PuVRD is still used in Russia on various UAVs; e.g. and aerial targets! Pu-jet engines were also proposed for equipping gliding bombs... Only in Russia are valveless Pu-jet engines now widespread, and the V-1 had valve-operated ones...! By the way, there are Russian models with 2 thrusters!
    4. +2
      12 January 2024 14: 13
      Quote: Tucan
      As for the pulsating jet engine, it seems to me that its potential has not been exhausted, and the PuVRJ can still be used on kamikaze drones and aerial targets.

      PuVRD is still used in Russia on various UAVs; e.g. and aerial targets! Pu-jet engines were also proposed for equipping gliding bombs... Only in Russia are valveless Pu-jet engines now widespread, and the V-1 had valve-operated ones...! By the way, there are Russian models with 2 thrusters!
    5. +5
      12 January 2024 22: 48
      Quote: Tucan
      PuVRDs can still be used on kamikaze drones and aerial targets.

      The company that currently develops and produces valveless thrusters recently stated that it is capable of producing improved thrusters with much more power at acceptable efficiency than the “real” ones; but for this it is necessary to create a special electronic engine control system! This is a very costly development for the company... (the company develops and produces engines on its own initiative at its own expense!) Financial assistance from the RF Ministry of Defense would be very useful; but the Moscow Region shows no interest in PuVRD!
  2. -5
    12 January 2024 03: 56
    The Kamikaze background did not take off... And it wouldn’t have been much use, with such visibility.

    and did not provide reliable operation over the entire temperature range
    Nobody bothered with this. Although in this case it’s good that they didn’t waste a lot of money on a stupid series.
  3. +1
    12 January 2024 04: 30
    Quote: Sergey Linnik
    Average fuel consumption was 2,35 l/km. Fuel tank capacity – up to 640 l

    Crazy expense for a country at war!
    1. +10
      12 January 2024 12: 38
      Quote: Dutchman Michel
      Quote: Sergey Linnik
      Average fuel consumption was 2,35 l/km. Fuel tank capacity – up to 640 l

      Crazy expense for a country at war!

      By aviation standards, the cost to deliver a 1000 kg bomb is not such a big expense. In addition, the Argus As 014 engine could run on gasoline with an octane number of 70 rather than on aviation fuel.
      1. +6
        12 January 2024 20: 12
        Seryozha, thank you for the excellent material! good
        About the fact that both ours and our allies shamelessly stole all the innovative ideas from the defeated Germans,
        knew before. But without such interesting details.
        I look forward to continuing.

        Greetings and best wishes to Olga! love
        1. +4
          13 January 2024 03: 16
          Konstantin, greetings from the Far East!
          It's very nice to have you with us again!
          1. +5
            13 January 2024 03: 18
            I am also very pleased to.))
            Olya, come visit us at Violet.
            True, we sometimes behave hooligans there, but in moderation. love
            1. +5
              13 January 2024 03: 27
              Kostya, thank you for the invitation!
              Seryozha registered there, well, I took one look at it. The best people who used to hang out in the “History” section of VO gathered at “Violet”. I can't compare with such "bison". And I go to VO very rarely. There is not enough time for everything. For example, the day before yesterday Seryozha and I went to the taiga to rescue a cat whose owner, due to poor health, moved to the city, and the cat was left alone in the attic of a winter hut built in the forest on the shore of a lake. Well, your business is above the roof.
              1. +4
                13 January 2024 03: 53
                Why compare with the “bison”, you can just communicate with them, and the men are really interesting, both in their knowledge of history and in their life experience. Yes, and brighten up the male company for us, there are no women there. love
                Special thanks for the cat from the taiga!!! smile
                A huge hello from me to Sergei! drinks
                We wait. smile
        2. 0
          13 January 2024 18: 23
          About the fact that both ours and our allies shamelessly stole all the innovative ideas from the defeated Germans,


          It would be something to tear up. Most German "innovative ideas" were inferior to American, Soviet and British ones. The feeling that “the Germans invented everything” arose solely because German experiments became known to the general public soon after the war - there was no point in keeping them secret. But both the USA and the USSR kept their own wartime developments secret for a long time.
  4. +9
    12 January 2024 06: 18
    When talking about the Fi 103 cruise missile, it is worth mentioning the manned version,

    It is interesting that the famous German pilot Hanna Reitsch tested the manned version.
    1. +1
      12 January 2024 07: 14
      Quote: Amateur
      It’s interesting that the famous German pilot Hanna Reitsch tested the manned version

      It seems that V-1 was tested. Somehow everyone forgot about her
      1. +3
        12 January 2024 13: 05
        It seems that V-1 was tested.

        FAU-1 (V-1) is the promotional name for Fi-103
        1. +3
          12 January 2024 14: 44
          Quote: Amateur
          FAU-1 (V-1) is the promotional name for Fi-103

          This projectile entered the Russian language as FAU
  5. Des
    +8
    12 January 2024 06: 37
    Article by the author, as always), a sample presentation of information. I’m pleasantly surprised that some of the details of the Fi 103 launch passed me by (at one time I was fascinated by the topic). Thank you.
  6. Des
    +1
    12 January 2024 06: 37
    Article by the author, as always), a sample presentation of information. I’m pleasantly surprised that some of the details of the Fi 103 launch passed me by (at one time I was fascinated by the topic). Thank you.
  7. +9
    12 January 2024 06: 59
    When I was studying at university in the rocketry training laboratory I saw an engine from a V-1. Indeed, a very simple design: a profiled channel, inlet louvers, a spark plug and a fuel supply pipe. There was also one PuVRD, one of the laboratory employees was very passionate about this topic
    1. +6
      12 January 2024 07: 07
      Quote: Nikolay R-PM
      Indeed a very simple design

      Everything there is as simple as an orange. Just have time to fill the tanks with fuel wink
    2. +8
      12 January 2024 08: 50
      Indeed, a very simple design: a profiled channel, inlet louvers, a spark plug and a fuel supply pipe.

      Yes. About 50 years ago, such engines were actively made in aircraft modeling circles, smaller in size, of course. They don’t even need machines, very simple technologies. Started with batteries and a pump. Terribly noisy.
      1. +1
        12 January 2024 22: 27
        Quote: Ivan Ivanych Ivanov
        Noisy terribly

        This "property" can be used! For example, an acoustic generator (emitter) was proposed for military use!
  8. +9
    12 January 2024 10: 23
    Some missiles were equipped with radio beacons, and their position was tracked by German direction finders, which made it possible to accurately determine the location of their fall and, based on the data obtained, make adjustments during subsequent launches.

    About every tenth. The FuG 23 transmitter was used as a radio beacon, which transmitted a certain combination of characters in Morse code, individual for each missile.
  9. +4
    12 January 2024 14: 31
    Serial production of the Fi 103 began in August 1943. Assembly was carried out at four factories: Nordhausen, Ham, South Fallersleben and Magdeburg-Schönebeck. Another 50 companies were involved in the production of components. Until March 1945, more than 25 cruise missiles were built.

    In 20 months - 25000 missiles. We haven’t done that much in two years of SVO, even taking into account the Geraniums. But the Germans also produced the V-2.
  10. +5
    12 January 2024 15: 45
    two such aircraft are on museum display.
    Five - one Phi-103r each in the States, Canada, England, France and Switzerland.
  11. +3
    12 January 2024 16: 50
    Quote: Tucan
    A good overview of the V-1 and the post-war descendants of this cruise missile, definitely a “+”.
    As for the pulsating jet engine, it seems to me that its potential has not been exhausted, and the PuVRJ can still be used on kamikaze drones and aerial targets.

    I agree, the author, as always, is radically different for the better from the well-known local “writer” K.R.
  12. +9
    12 January 2024 18: 06
    hi
    As always, an interesting article!
    A little nasty sound FAU1, it seems:

    https://youtu.be/Ch11-aqxyfY?t=9

    A post-war British report states that 7547 "flying bombs" entered English airspace. Of these, 1847 were shot down by fighters, 1866 were destroyed by anti-aircraft artillery, 232 were victims of barrage balloons, and 12 were shot down by anti-aircraft artillery from Royal Navy ships.

    There was an interesting practice to destroy the FAU (the reasons are not clear, either the lack of ammunition, or the fear of warhead detonation): “capsizing by hooking the wing”:

    https://youtu.be/JrD3zGtyXXY
    1. +6
      12 January 2024 20: 08
      And, as always, excellent comments from our Wild Cat.)) good
    2. +2
      13 January 2024 17: 59
      There was an interesting practice for destroying the FAU (the reasons are not clear, either the lack of ammunition, or the fear of warhead detonation): “rollover by hooking the wing”

      At one time I read that it was just aerial recklessness, flying show-off.
  13. +1
    12 January 2024 20: 03
    Good article. The effectiveness of V2 was about 50%. Level of modern cruise missiles and UAVs.
    1. 0
      13 January 2024 18: 01
      Because at that time they didn’t even try to intercept them. Nothing.
  14. +4
    12 January 2024 21: 58
    Thanks for the article, I’m looking forward to the next one about the V-2, I’m really looking forward to it.
    1. +2
      13 January 2024 04: 11
      Quote: merkava-2bet
      Thanks for the article, I’m looking forward to the next one about the V-2, I’m really looking forward to it.

      Andrey, welcome!
      About V-2 will be next week.
  15. +3
    12 January 2024 23: 42
    The cruise missile was converted into a manned version by installing a pilot's cabin in the place where compressed air cylinders were located in the standard Fi 103
    The Germans tried to “insert” an ejection seat into the projectile aircraft, but they did not succeed; there was too little space for the pilot's cabin! It is worth noting that the manned V-1s were “conceived” in the “air-to-ground” and “air-to-ship” variants (the “sea” version with a torpedo...) By the way, the Germans handed over documentation on the V-1 and on the PuVRD (part of documentation, it seems, was lost during transportation...) Based on the documentation received, the Japanese developed manned projectile aircraft with the "Bayka" ramjet engine! But we didn’t have time before the capitulation!
  16. -3
    13 January 2024 08: 38
    It turned out that when firing at the maximum range and normal operation of all systems, the missile with a probability of 0,9 fell into a circle with a diameter of 10 km.

    In fact, it was more likely that carriers such as V1 and V2 should deliver conventional sea mines and torpedoes directly to English harbors, and radio-corrected torpedoes to the area of ​​convoy movement. But in those days they didn’t think of this.