Tractor torment of the US Army

23
Tractor torment of the US Army

US Army Caterpillar D7 pulling the M1917 gun (licensed copy of the legendary Canon de 155 Grande Puissance Filloux (GPF) mle. 1917), Hawaiian Islands, Oahu, 1940.

The American military's complaints about tractors as artillery tractors were the same as those of the military in other countries - first - low speed, second - the tractor, except for the tractor driver, a couple of riders and a minimum of "baggage", did not carry anything else. The crew, ammunition, etc. were either somehow attached to the tractor along with the gun, or they were traveling separately. Although the Americans' tractors were still relatively nimble.

The same Allis-Chalmers Tractor, Crawler, Diesel, Model HD-10W, one of the tractors standardized as the “Heavy M1 Tractor” (Tractor, Heavy, M1), based on their technical data presented in the official technical manual of the US Army (TM 9 -787A), reached a speed of almost 18 kilometers per hour (11 miles per hour), which is several times higher than the maximum speed of the same “Stalinets-65”. But the American military was still not satisfied with such indicators.




A five-ton (this is the tractor's own weight) Holt tractor pulls a small road train from a barrel of water, a field kitchen and a trailer of the 3rd Field Artillery Brigade of the US Army, Germany, 1918.

The American military saw two ways out of the situation - heavy, three-axle trucks with all-wheel drive and high-speed tracked tractors. There was also an option with half-track trucks, and they were even in limited military use, but these were tractors for fairly light artillery systems. Americans thought about all this back in the late 1930s. The army had trucks, but they were no longer satisfactory to the military; something new was needed, and they were not suitable for all artillery systems; some had to be carried exclusively by tractors.


One of the early experiments of the US Army to replace classic tractors as artillery tractors is the T5 light tractor. There was already speed, but everything else was not very good.

In 1940, a Diamond truck and a high-speed crawler tractor from the Cleveland Tractor Company entered testing. The army accepts both the truck and the tractor and begins purchasing them. True, the tractor, standardized in February 1941 as the M2, has one of the disadvantages of an ordinary tractor - except for the tractor driver and two passengers, it does not carry anyone or anything, which, in general, predetermined its future fate; it became an airfield tractor. Model T 967 trucks (and other models of the same series) until the very end of the war would be used as tractors for artillery, only 155-mm howitzers of various models became the ceiling for them, and the army had heavier artillery systems.


Old and new. Comparative tests of an experimental Walter ADUM tractor with a 155-mm M1 gun on a trailer and a tractor also with a 155-mm, but M1917, Fort Bragg, 1941.

The Walter company, which specialized in all-wheel drive mining dump trucks and heavy special equipment on truck chassis, decided to grab a piece of military orders with its 1940 tractor. Didn't take off. Based on the sum of its characteristics, the tractor won.

As a result, the US Army entered World War II with tractors as the uncontested tractors for a number of artillery systems. At the beginning of the war, the “Heavy Tractor M1” (Tractor, Heavy, M1), the “Medium Tractor M1” (Tractor, Medium, M1) and the “Light Tractor M1/M2” (Tractor, Light, M1/M2) were standardized. At the same time, do not be confused by the single army designation for the same heavy tractors, under one index M1 were hidden:

– Allis-Chalmers Tractor, Crawler, Diesel, Model HD-10W;
– International Heavy Tractor, Crawler, Diesel, Model TD-18;
– Caterpillar Tractor, Crawler, Diesel, Model D7;
– Caterpillar Tractor, Crawler, Diesel, Model D8.

A similar situation was with medium and light tractors. Moreover, light and medium-sized tractors could even have gasoline engines (Caterpillar Tractor, Crawler, Gasoline, Model R4, for example).


M2, which never became a replacement for tractors, in its natural habitat - at the airfield.

Only in 1943 the army finally received a heavy all-wheel drive truck that met its needs - Mack NO. In the same year, the first high-speed tracked tractors entered the army. There were problems only with the heavy M6 High-Speed ​​Tractor, which went into production only in February 1944. The main purpose of this tractor was to transport 203- and 240-mm artillery systems. But in this case the army did not put up with tractor speeds, and a series of “substitute” tractors was developed. We made them by simply taking an ARV or a fighter tanks and removing everything unnecessary from it... The German approach.


Both photos were taken in Sicily in 1943 and both show the M155 1mm gun. Only in one case does a tractor act as a tractor; in the other, its replacement in this role is a Mack NO truck. It is clearly visible that behind the tractor is a truck carrying a crew of guns and ammunition. 1943 was a turning point in terms of the use of tractors as artillery tractors. The Sicilian operation was the last operation in the Mediterranean theater of operations where tractors were used by the Americans as artillery tractors.

In general, in 1943 the tractor-traction suffering of the army could be considered closed. But there were several theaters of war where high-speed tractors were not sent in the first place, and trucks often could not cope even with the transportation of relatively light artillery systems, simply due to the specifics of the road conditions.


Road conditions in Burma in 1945 - the steeper the jeep, the further you have to go behind the tractor. A Caterpillar tractor helps a Diamond T truck towing a 155mm M1917 howitzer cross a local stream. The howitzer and crew are from the Kuomintang, the tractor is from American engineers.

We are talking about Burma and the Pacific theater of war. Where roads were often absent as a class, and a tank could drown on local trails during the rainy season, the tractor often turned out to be the only means of transportation. Tractors were used as tractors even for light artillery systems with a caliber of 105 millimeters in the Pacific Ocean until the very end of the war.


In the Pacific theater, tractors also worked simply as trucks, like the average M1 on New Britain in 1944.

In 1943, the US Army stopped accepting most of the tractors produced. The exception was heavy diesel tractors from Caterpillar; they formed the basis of the equipment fleet of airfield construction battalions of the US Air Force and US Army engineering battalions.


Gunners of the 251st Field Artillery Battalion, US Army, fire 105mm howitzers at Japanese positions, Philippines, June 1945. In the background you can see the battalion's equipment - jeeps, Dodge 3/4 and a medium M1 tractor. The Americans are clearly not afraid of return fire.

But in general this is all just part of the tractor stories US Armed Forces in World War II. After all, they had their own tractors fleet and the Marine Corps. American tractors were also actively sent to the USSR. But this, as usual, is a completely different story.


Tractors were actively used until the very end of the war, however, already in the role of engineering vehicles, like this armored Caterpillar D7 of the 305th Engineer Battalion of the US Army in Belgium in January 1945. Americans experimented with armoring tractors during the First World War. In the foreground is a high-speed M5 tractor with a 155-mm M1 howitzer (future M114) in tow. You can clearly see how much of the crew’s belongings the car is carrying, there’s even straw for arranging a place to sleep for the night.
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    31 December 2023 05: 02
    An interesting, little-studied topic. Auto RU "+"But it would also be interesting to read about the “tractor torment” of the Red Army.
    1. +8
      31 December 2023 11: 11
      Pasholok recently had an article about the D-7 tractor.
      Specified in the article.
      And his tests in the USSR.
      Read it!
  2. -4
    31 December 2023 06: 21
    Quote: zyablik.olga
    An interesting, little-studied topic. Auto RU "+"But it would also be interesting to read about the “tractor torment” of the Red Army.

    And who is stopping you?
    Anyone who is really interested in this has long read: https://royallib.com/author/prochko_e.html
  3. +12
    31 December 2023 07: 28
    We would have had such “torment” at that time....
    1. +2
      31 December 2023 20: 50
      Quote: MCmaximus
      We would have had such “torment” at that time....

      A non-standard move would be to use locomotives. In any case, in 1877 in the Russian-Turkish war they were used as trackless traction. Yes, they are simpler and provide the basis for production in the form of locomotive building and locomotive repair.
      In WWII they tried unsuccessfully to use rutiers as field tractors, while they could be seen as valuable equipment with internal combustion engines at airfields, ports, workshops and warehouses, where there was concrete for them.
  4. +2
    31 December 2023 08: 43
    Quote: MCmaximus
    We would have had such “torment” at that time....

    Light semi-armored tractor Komsomolets. At the beginning of the war, 6600 units. in the troops.

    High-speed transport tractor STZ-5. A total of 9994 vehicles were produced, of which 6605 were produced during the war.

    Transport tractor S-2, as of January 1, 1942, there were 892 vehicles in the army.

    Comintern heavy tractor, at the beginning of the war there were 1500 of them in the army.

    Heavy tractor Voroshilovets, 1123 vehicles were produced.

    Light tractors of the Ya-11, Ya-12 series. The total production during the war was 2200 pieces.

    All these vehicles had cargo-passenger bodies and a speed high enough for tracked tractors.
    Work on the creation of special army multi-purpose tractors began in the USSR in the mid-thirties.
  5. +8
    31 December 2023 09: 18
    under one index M1 were hidden:

    In addition to those listed by the author under the designation M1 Heavy Tractor, there were also
    - Caterpillar Model 60;
    - Caterpillar RD7;
    - Allis-Chalmers Model L.
    1. +6
      31 December 2023 14: 33
      Quote: Dekabrist
      In addition to those listed by the author under the designation M1 Heavy Tractor, there were also

      Americans have long amused us with their amazingly straightforward classification. laughing
      They have an M1 tractor and an M1 tank and an M1 cannon, and an M1 rifle and an M1 carbine. Moreover, regularly, under new presidents, they are attacked by the itch of reform and they re-qualify everything again, completely destroying the M2\M3 that accidentally appeared and returning the canonical M1 to all branches of the military. As a result, they had the M1917 tank in service in 1, and in 2017 they still have the M1 tank in service. wassat
      1. +10
        31 December 2023 16: 40
        They have an M1 tractor and an M1 tank and an M1 cannon, and an M1 rifle and an M1 carbine

        And the M1 mortar, and the M1 armored car, and the M1 reconnaissance vehicle, and the M1 cavalry tank, etc. and so on. You can write an article about "M1 in the US Army."
        1. +6
          31 December 2023 17: 04
          Quote: Dekabrist
          You can write an article about "M1 in the US Army."

          By the way, write! Albeit a small one. So to speak - the American classification in dynamics. You seem to have a good understanding of “rivets”, you will obviously be able to say something specific, otherwise articles like “a lot of words about nothing” are already a little boring.
  6. +9
    31 December 2023 09: 31
    There were problems only with the heavy M6 High-Speed ​​Tractor, which went into production only in February 1944. The main purpose of this tractor was to transport 203- and 240-mm artillery systems

    Of the 203 mm artillery systems, the M6 ​​High-Speed ​​Tractor towed only the 8-inch gun M1. And the M1 8-inch howitzer was towed by the lighter M4 High-Speed ​​Tractor.
    The first photo shows a cannon, the second photo shows a howitzer.
  7. +8
    31 December 2023 09: 32
    In my opinion, I read from Masataka Okumie that American aviation owes its successes to the Caterpillar bulldozer. The speed of setting up airfields in the jungle was an order of magnitude higher.
  8. +9
    31 December 2023 09: 43
    Quote: mr.ZinGer
    In my opinion, I read from Masataka Okumie that American aviation owes its successes to the Caterpillar bulldozer. The speed of setting up airfields in the jungle was an order of magnitude higher.

    "An aircraft carrier, a submarine and a bulldozer.
    The first destroyed the Japanese navy, the second the commercial fleet, and the bulldozer made combat operations possible."
    Some American general, in some book of his. I'm sorry, but I can't remember who and where wink.
  9. +6
    31 December 2023 11: 56
    It is good to fight with an undestroyed economy. You can become aesthetic in the choice of tractors.
  10. +6
    31 December 2023 14: 37
    A good article, an interesting topic that doesn’t come up often, and the photos aren’t shabby. Definitely a plus for the author!
  11. +2
    31 December 2023 16: 59
    The problem of “the army and the tractor” is created because in the army, as in all complex structures of humanity, power is achieved by people who are unfit to use power. They can get power, use it correctly - in principle, no!
    The point is that a tractor is NOT a VEHICLE! At all! At all! Absolutely! The tractor is basically the same, but the tractor is still closer) And the tractor is a self-propelled mechanism for driving agricultural machinery. To solve this problem, the tractor, in particular, has a drive shaft, from which all sorts of seeders, winnowers and threshers are driven. Apparently the word “thresher” gave the army high ranks the wrong associations.
    In order to solve a problem effectively, the means of solving it must be specially adapted. The best tractor for the army is the Ural in the army modification, as a specially adapted means for moving people and cargo in rear conditions. The best tractor for the army is never a tractor! Tractors have no business in the army, and those who put them there simply do not understand their business.
    I guess that the army commanders also had serious complaints about the use of sugar tongs in the army. There is only one way out - there is no need to use them in the army!
  12. +5
    31 December 2023 20: 35
    >
    Dear Author.
    Could you tell me the time when active deliveries of American tractors to the USSR began?
    1. 0
      1 January 2024 20: 17
      A lot of people were sent to war. Among them were hundreds of transport mechanisms that could only operate effectively on concrete floors. That is, these were not tractors, of course, but factory transporters. But once the army laid its paw on them, they were all drowned in the mud almost instantly. There was an article on VO about this, the author of which also did not understand at all what he was writing about.
      1. -1
        2 January 2024 12: 42
        Describe in more detail these very “transport mechanisms for milking a concrete floor”!
        And in what year the Red Army “laid its paw” on them.
  13. +1
    31 December 2023 20: 49
    Quote: Mikhail3
    The "army and tractor" problem

    Tractors are very different, agricultural, industrial, TRANSPORT.
    Reading Prochko. I gave the link at the very beginning of the discussion. Everything is written and written with knowledge.
    Today's army tractors are essentially transport tractors.
    1. 0
      1 January 2024 20: 29
      The problem is that transport tractors cannot exist) Look at the photo accompanying the article. Do you see, for example, a tractor caterpillar? It is designed to move through strictly defined types of soil. The kind you see in the fields. These tracks cannot work effectively either in swamps, paving stones, asphalt, or on a very rough battlefield. They are not designed like that) They were made by talented engineers who did not at all imagine such a level of uh... boundless stupidity that the users of their mechanisms would show.
      The weight distribution of the tractor chassis is designed either to move only the tractor itself, or to drag (so be it) a cart in which the load is no more than about one fiftieth of the engine power, or a plow that has a precisely calculated geometry and is immersed in the ground.
      We don’t read brainless writers who, through unknown means, have received “scientific” titles and the opportunity to publish their illiterate nonsense. In order to move cargo over a variety of soils, the transmission of such a tractor, its weight and weight distribution must be completely different, completely different from tractor ones.
  14. 0
    4 January 2024 14: 56
    Thanks to the author for the article. The topic is "not well-worn". In our country, too, Kirov trucks were designed primarily as tractors.... And happy holidays to everyone!
  15. -1
    9 January 2024 12: 01
    Quote: Mikhail3
    We don't read brainless writers

    Hm! But you are modest!
    Follow the link to read about the author of the books I recommend: https://ser-sarajkin.narod2.ru/ALL_OUT/TiVOut10/ProchkoE/ProchkoE001.htm
    Your opinion will look more convincing if you publish some fragments of your scientific and design activities.