Swedish self-propelled guns Archer in Ukraine

35
Swedish self-propelled guns Archer in Ukraine
Swedish self-propelled gun Archer somewhere in Ukraine. Photo Telegram / BMPD


More than a year ago, it became known that the Swedish government plans to transfer several Archer self-propelled artillery systems to the Kyiv regime. The preparation of such a delivery was seriously delayed, and the first vehicles arrived in Ukraine only a few weeks ago. At the same time, as in the case of other modern foreign models, we are talking about a limited amount of equipment, which will not allow it to realize its full potential and will create additional difficulties.



Plans and supplies


In the recent past, the Swedish ground forces acquired and distributed among artillery units 48 Archer-type self-propelled guns. By the beginning of 2023, only half of this equipment remained in active service, while the rest of the vehicles were sent to reserve. However, they found a use.

Since February-March 2022, the Swedish government has repeatedly provided assistance to the Kyiv regime. In September, the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, announcing the next package of deliveries, announced that in the future Ukraine could be given the Archer self-propelled guns from its own army. However, at that time the issue was at the preliminary stage, and detailed plans were not available.

At the end of October, the Swedish press was able to obtain a classified report from the Ministry of Defense, which provided assessments of the existing army equipment fleet and its potential in the context of assistance to Ukraine. It was reported that, without harm to itself, Sweden could transfer up to 12 wheeled self-propelled guns from stock. The government of the country had to study the information provided and draw up new plans to help the Kyiv regime.


Ukrainian crew at work. Photo Telegram / BMPD

In January 2023, the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs again raised the topic of Archer self-propelled guns. This time, the head of the department, Tobias Billström, said that such machines would be included in the next aid package, but again did not specify the volumes and timing. However, they didn’t wait long - already on January 19, the government approved such a package. It provided for the supply of various property worth 4,3 billion Swedish kronor (approx. 418 million US dollars), incl. an undisclosed number of "Archers".

In mid-March, the planned supply volumes became known. Then the leadership of Sweden and Great Britain entered into a new agreement on cooperation in the field of artillery. In accordance with this document, the Swedish side was supposed to send only eight wheeled self-propelled guns to Ukraine. Two of them were designated as "maintenance" vehicles - probably they were considered as a source of spare parts.

In addition, the Swedish-British agreement provided for the shipment of 14 Swedish self-propelled guns to the UK. Due to this, the latter was supposed to free up its AS-90 self-propelled guns for transfer to the Kyiv regime. The agreement also determined the conditions for joint operation and maintenance of equipment sent from Sweden abroad.

In mid-May, Swedish media reported on a secret training program for Ukrainian personnel. According to them, a Ukrainian brigade of 3-5 thousand people was trained in Sweden. Foreign “guests” mastered Swedish weapons and equipment, including self-propelled Archers.


"Archer" in stowed position. Photo: Swedish Ministry of Defense

Transferred equipment


Over the next few months, there was no reliable information about the supply of Swedish self-propelled guns to Ukraine. As it became known later, the self-propelled guns were shipped and delivered to Ukraine only in early or mid-autumn. It is unknown what caused such delays.

The arrival of Archer products at the disposal of the Kyiv regime became known in early November. This information was confirmed by photographs of combat vehicles and Ukrainian artillerymen. It is reported that the vehicles were transferred to the 45th separate artillery brigade. Judging by the situation in the photographs, the equipment has already entered the combat zone.

During November-December, new photographic materials appeared repeatedly, indicating the use of Archers in combat units. However, there is no reliable information about their combat use yet. It is possible that self-propelled guns are firing and trying to attack our targets, but the effect they have cannot be distinguished from other enemy artillery systems.

It seems that all transferred Swedish self-propelled guns remain in service for now. Information about their destruction has not yet appeared. However, given the sad fate of other foreign equipment that came to Ukraine, news this kind of thing can be expected at almost any time.


Recharging styling. Photo: Swedish Ministry of Defense

Modern artillery


The future Archer self-propelled guns have been developed since the mid-nineties by the Swedish company Bofors (now part of BAE Systems) with the participation of a number of other organizations. Since the end of the XNUMXs, Norwegian industry has been involved in the project. The entire range of tests of experimental equipment and its weapons was carried out in the second half of the same decade, and then the first supply contracts appeared.

Sweden and Norway became the starting customers for Archer - they planned to purchase 24 self-propelled guns each. The Swedish army received its equipment in the first half of the 2016s. Then Norway abandoned its order, and Sweden decided to buy its equipment from the manufacturer in 2023. Deliveries under the additional contract continued until XNUMX.

As a result of all these events, the Swedish army, until recently, was the only operator of the Archer self-propelled guns. Now Ukraine has joined it, and deliveries to the UK are beginning. In addition, the Swedish self-propelled gun is currently participating in the Swiss Army competition.

"Archer" is a combat vehicle on a wheeled chassis, equipped with an automated artillery unit. Serial self-propelled guns have so far been built on the Volvo A30D chassis, but a few years ago a variant based on the Rheinmetall HX2 was proposed. The nose of the chassis houses an armored cabin with crew workstations and a full set of controls. In the stern there is a combat module of the original design.


Archer solves the fire problem. Photo: Swedish Ministry of Defense

The combat module is made in the form of a swinging casing in which the gun and loading mechanisms are installed. Its design provides horizontal guidance within 85° to the right and left of the neutral position and vertical guidance up to +70°. The module is equipped with a 155-mm gun with a barrel length of 52 klb, made on the basis of the serial FH-77 howitzer. The gun has a developed muzzle brake and is mounted on hydropneumatic recoil devices.

Inside the casing there is a mechanized stowage system for 21 155 mm caliber projectiles and 126 propellant charge modules, as well as mechanisms for feeding ammunition into the barrel. The automatic loader provides a maximum rate of fire of up to 8 rounds/min. During prolonged shooting, the rate is reduced to 1-1,5 rounds/min. After the transported ammunition is used up, reloading is required using an ammunition transporter.

The Archer self-propelled gun received an advanced fire control system for its time. It included satellite and inertial navigation tools, a ballistic computer with different fire modes, remote control of the combat module, a programmer for working with projectiles, etc. Due to such a fire control system, the time required to prepare for firing is reduced and accuracy is increased.

The relatively long barrel gives a high firing range. "Archer" sends a conventional projectile at a range of up to 30 km. The active-reactive firing range is up to 40-60 km, depending on its type. When using guided munitions, increased accuracy and probability of hitting a target are claimed.

Advantages and disadvantages


The Archer self-propelled gun was created in the recent past, taking into account the accumulated experience and new concepts for the use of self-propelled artillery. As a result, it has a number of important features that are advantages in most situations. At the same time, self-propelled guns are not without drawbacks and may face known risks.


New modification of Archer on the HX2 chassis. Photo by BAE Systems

The strengths of the Archer are considered to be high mobility and mobility, provided by the wheeled chassis. The vehicle can quickly move along roads and terrain, which simplifies transfer and access to a firing position. Modern and advanced electronics simplify the work of the crew as a whole and speed up the execution of basic procedures, which has a positive effect on survivability. In addition, an original combat module with an automatic loader was used, which makes it possible to solve a fire mission and leave the position in a minimum amount of time. At the same time, a long-barreled gun allows one to obtain high range characteristics.

However, there are also disadvantages, some of which are directly related to the advantages of self-propelled guns. Thus, the wheeled chassis is convenient on paved roads, but on off-road and rough terrain it risks getting bogged down, making the self-propelled gun an easy target. The automatic loader carries limited ammunition, and the ability to fire for a long time without reloading is seriously limited. In addition, the survivability of such a machine raises questions. Key units, including ammunition stowage, have little armor and can be hit by a variety of means.

It should be expected that Ukrainian artillerymen will not be able to fully use all the characteristic features and advantages of the Archer. This will be prevented by objective factors of a technical and other nature, active opposition from the Russian army and illiterate operation by Ukrainian artillerymen.

It was reported that Ukraine will receive only eight Swedish self-propelled guns, two of which are not intended for combat use and will be used for spare parts. The six remaining vehicles, even successful ones with high performance, will not be able to influence the state of the Ukrainian artillery. At the same time, the Russian army will try to quickly destroy them or take them as a trophy for study.
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    20 December 2023 04: 44
    With sufficient accuracy, well-designed target designation can cause trouble, and the small capacity of the automatic loader is not a hindrance here.
    1. +2
      20 December 2023 07: 25
      We have a huge number of those who advocate for “cheaper” ones, like it’s better to release wagons of blanks somewhere else
      1. -4
        20 December 2023 08: 24
        The USA and Italy have hundreds of M109s in storage, but the hegemon forces the vassals to supply some complex and exotic art systems in scanty quantities. This means that the hegemon is waiting for something or is completely satisfied with the current situation.
        1. +9
          20 December 2023 15: 02
          They are supplied with fresh and long-range models that can shoot our self-propelled guns. To deliver sensitive blows to us.
  2. +5
    20 December 2023 05: 20
    It would be strange if the Swedes did not use this opportunity for testing.
  3. +11
    20 December 2023 05: 22
    long-term firing without reloading are seriously limited

    In the conditions of today's battle, when you need to quickly shoot back and just as quickly leave, prolonged firing is dangerous to health. Maybe something will fly from the sky wink
    1. -3
      4 January 2024 21: 38
      . today's battle, when you need to quickly shoot back and just as quickly leave,

      At what military school were you taught this kind of “today’s” combat? Shoot and leave? Which charter did you read? Have you ever seen this on video from SVO?
      1. +3
        5 January 2024 04: 19
        Quote: stankow
        At what military school were you taught this kind of “today’s” combat?

        Have you heard anything about counter-battery warfare?
        1. -3
          5 January 2024 22: 46
          Have you heard about the stability of defense? Fire planning? Carrying out fire missions? Subordination to a combined arms commander? Fire maneuver? Barrage fire? Art preparation for attack? Have you revealed at least one charter, one instruction?
          1. +4
            6 January 2024 04: 45
            Quote: stankow
            Have you revealed at least one charter, one instruction?

            Do you draw your experience from the experience of the First World War? Or the Greco-Persian wars?
            1. -2
              6 January 2024 14: 42
              No, from the reality of the Northern Military District. You need to have an eye to look, and not at the video of girls in makeup, for which the militia rode into the field and fired two shells back and forth into the cowshed. No, that's not how they fight. But people suck.
              1. +2
                6 January 2024 17: 42
                Quote: stankow
                No, from the reality of SVO

                You seem to be looking at some other reality wink
                1. -2
                  9 January 2024 01: 59
                  One internet for everyone
                  .................
  4. +13
    20 December 2023 06: 44
    I will add on my own behalf. In my humble opinion, this is the best NATO self-propelled gun. There is a video on YouTube of her driving up, firing several shots and quickly driving away. It takes less than 2 minutes!!! Considering the accuracy, firing range and speed, this is a very dangerous enemy... Pisi. We would like one like this for comparison with Malva.
    1. -2
      20 December 2023 15: 02
      The Germans have the farthest.....and
    2. The comment was deleted.
  5. +1
    20 December 2023 07: 26
    Well, the wheels have been around for a long time, and the climate in Sweden is harsher than ours. And here everyone is afraid of wheeled things, so, traditions must be respected request
    1. -1
      20 December 2023 17: 15
      Quote: Vadim S
      Well, the wheels have been around for a long time, and the climate in Sweden is harsher than ours. And here everyone is afraid of wheeled things, so, traditions must be respected request

      Or maybe you shouldn’t follow the example of a country that made a serial turretless tank with a rigidly mounted gun and guidance by rotating the hull and suspension? Or a serial double-barreled muzzle-loading self-propelled mortar with a loading mechanism, but with manual guidance drives (yes, yes, yes, I’m talking about Granatkastarpansarbandvagn 90120)? wink

      Moreover, the Swedes made a mistake with the chassis in the first version of Archer - and now they are correcting the mistake by switching to a four-axle base, developed specifically for the army.
    2. -1
      21 December 2023 01: 48
      Quote: Vadim S
      Well, the wheels have been around for a long time, and the climate in Sweden is harsher than ours. And here everyone is afraid of wheeled things, so, traditions must be respected request

      The fact of the matter is that their soils are harsher and much worse than in Russia and Ukraine. They have no black soils in principle. In principle, they don’t have such mud in the Russian Federation or country 404.
    3. -1
      21 December 2023 02: 15
      Quote: Vadim S
      and the climate in Sweden is harsher than ours.

      On the contrary, they have a very mild climate. True, I don’t know what climate you call “ours”.

      Quote: Vadim S
      Now, the wheels have been around for a long time, and the climate

      By the way, what does climate have to do with it?
  6. +3
    20 December 2023 07: 50
    Thus, the wheeled chassis is convenient on paved roads, but on off-road and rough terrain it risks getting bogged down, making the self-propelled gun an easy target.
    Wheels have long been used off-road - the same "Sherpas". There is no need to reduce everything to tracks, given the low mobility
    1. +1
      21 December 2023 02: 17
      Quote: Stirbjorn
      Wheels have long been used off-road - the same "Sherpas".

      "Sherpa" has low pressure tires. They won’t survive a self-propelled gun with an armored turret.
  7. 0
    20 December 2023 07: 56
    After the transported ammunition is used up, reloading is required using an ammunition transporter.

    When reloading, I see a machine with a manipulator to make it easier to work with half-central cylinders. Manually, if necessary, will not work)
  8. 0
    20 December 2023 08: 08
    For me, this artillery system has one, but very big, drawback, which is the abundance of hydraulic systems used on it. Yet they are very vulnerable.
  9. -1
    20 December 2023 08: 37
    In any case, these newest self-propelled guns and other guns must be seriously studied. You need to know why they shoot so far and what kind of automatic loader they have, the composition of the gunpowder. By any means, trophies, stealing shells, stealing self-propelled guns. By the way, Smersh had a scientific and technical department for enemy equipment and weapons.
    We have a teacher at KTN, a retired colonel who served there during the war. He told a lot of interesting things and taught TMM (Theory of Machines and Mechanisms). soldier
  10. +1
    20 December 2023 09: 25
    Quote: Magic Archer
    I will add on my own behalf. In my humble opinion, this is the best NATO self-propelled gun. There is a video on YouTube of her driving up, firing several shots and quickly driving away. It takes less than 2 minutes!!! Considering the accuracy, firing range and speed, this is a very dangerous enemy... Pisi. We would like one like this for comparison with Malva.

    Hello. And if you compare Archer with the Korean K-series self-propelled guns, who is better and why?
  11. -1
    20 December 2023 17: 09
    Serial self-propelled guns have so far been built on the Volvo A30D chassis, but a few years ago a variant based on the Rheinmetall HX2 was proposed.

    The Archer on the Rheinmetall HX2 8x8 chassis is not just a “proposed option”. In September 2023, Sweden ordered 48 new Archers from BAE on this chassis with a delivery date of 2025.
    It seems that the concept of reducing the cost of self-propelled guns through the use of a modernized civilian chassis (Volvo A30D) did not justify itself - it was necessary to change the chassis to a specialized army one, and even a four-axle one.
    Who said anything about the redundancy of bases for Malva? wink
  12. 0
    20 December 2023 17: 44
    Quote: Magic Archer
    I will add on my own behalf. In my humble opinion, this is the best NATO self-propelled gun. There is a video on YouTube of her driving up, firing several shots and quickly driving away. It takes less than 2 minutes!!! Considering the accuracy, firing range and speed, this is a very dangerous enemy... Pisi. We would like one like this for comparison with Malva.

    Well, there’s nothing special to compare with Malva
    However, there are also disadvantages, some of which are directly related to the advantages of self-propelled guns. So, the wheeled chassis is comfortable on paved roads, but on off-road and rough terrain it risks getting stuck, making the self-propelled gun an easy target. The automatic loader carries limited ammunition, and the ability to fire for a long time without reloading is seriously limited. In addition, the survivability of such a machine raises questions. Key units, including ammunition stowage, have little armor and can be hit by a variety of means.

    Here we can add that Malva’s crew runs around the gun when firing, and Archer’s crew sits in an albeit weakly armored cabin. And so they are identical.
  13. +4
    20 December 2023 18: 26
    the ability to fire for a long time without reloading is seriously limited.

    21 shells are quite enough to suppress the enemy...
    Taking into account the “tactics” of such self-propelled guns: work on previously identified targets at long distances
    Those. drove out, shot and left - just for the counter-battery and processing the enemy’s front end...
    With a range from 30 to 60 km and a rate of fire of up to 8 rounds/min, we simply have nothing to oppose them except lancets...
    1. -2
      21 December 2023 02: 04
      We will have Coalition-SV 16 rounds per minute, 80 km range
      1. 0
        29 December 2023 18: 06
        The key here is “will”...
    2. 0
      5 January 2024 22: 52
      21 shells is minuscule. There will be a hundred in the battery. To suppress the enemy battery alone, 400 shells are needed. To destroy a battery of self-propelled guns, 900 shells are needed to suppress a company support. item 500. 21 pieces you say!? Cough laughing
  14. 0
    20 December 2023 19: 46
    Swedish self-propelled guns Archer in Ukraine
    Bad, small, useless!
    Author
    The article could easily fit into a familiar template. winked
  15. -1
    21 December 2023 02: 03
    Information has appeared that our Coalition-SV self-propelled guns have gone into production and individual units are already at the front. It will be interesting to see the confrontation between Sau Archer and the SV Coalition. Archer hits at 30-60 km, Coalition at 40-80 km, both crews are in armored capsules
    1. +1
      22 December 2023 09: 13
      Installing an uninhabited turret on a gimbal, this greatly simplifies the mechanism for reloading the gun, and makes the self-propelled gun lighter; the total weight is only 30 tons, which is less than that of the Coalition-SV-KSh, I think this solution should be used, for example, to create a large-caliber automatic mortar on a wheeled chassis.
    2. 0
      6 February 2024 15: 28
      Information has appeared that our Coalition-SV self-propelled guns have gone into production and individual units are already at the front.

      I can’t believe it anymore after Moscow Region Shoigu, during a recent visit to a plant that was supposed to produce coalitions, told its chief designer “guys, don’t play the fool here”