Large-caliber rifle SVDK

31
In the comments on the article about the VSSK sniper rifle, a small controversy arose over the comparison of this sample. weapons with a large-caliber sniper rifle of the SVDK. In my opinion, both samples are completely different classes and the only thing they have in common is that they are both large-caliber. I do not exclude the possibility that there is another rifle with the name of the SVDK, which I do not know about, but nobody enlightened me on this subject. Therefore, there is a good reason to make a short article on this sniper rifle, especially since the weapon, or rather ammunition, is very interesting in its first place. history.

As it is not difficult to guess, the SVDK is an adaptation of the SVD for more effective ammunition, but this does not mean that the adaptation was the simplest. The weapon is a self-loading rifle with automatic, working on powder gases discharged from the barrel, assembled in the classical layout. The butt of the weapon was taken from the SIDS rifle, that is, folding, but at the same time it was wearing a shock-absorbing butt pad with a larger area of ​​contact with the shoulder of the shooter in order to smooth out the impact of recoil when firing. The idea of ​​adapting the SVD under a powerful small-blood ammunition failed miserably. In fact, it was necessary to create in fact a new weapon similar in design to the SVD, but completely recounted, which is not surprising, since the difference in ammunition for both rifles is enormous. If you look at the weapon as a whole, then SVD is easily recognized in it, but only on a scale, which means that a lot of work has been invested in it, because the automation system is only half the battle, but a debugged and calculated automation system is already a finished product.

The barrel of the weapon, the bolt, the whole system of automatic rifle were replaced. The barrel is fixed in the receiver, it is not connected with the forearm, but due to the fact that in the weapon the automation system is implemented through the removal of gunpowder gases from the bore, you can not call it freely even with a big stretch. However, the shooting accuracy is significantly affected by the fact that the weapon forearm does not touch the barrel, and the bipods are fixed on the base rendered forward from the receiver, that is, they also do not touch the barrel of the weapon. Despite this, precision weapons are difficult to call, since its effective range is equal to just 600 meters.

The small distance of effective use of weapons is due to several factors at once, among which are primarily the use of automation, secondly, the thickness of the walls of the weapon’s barrel, in my opinion, the rifle’s inadequate weight, finally the cartridge, all this affects the accuracy of the weapon and in the total gives such not the best result. On the other hand, we should not forget also what goals the designers pursued when creating this rifle. And the main objectives were to maximize the weight of the weapon, with the possibility of effectively defeating the enemy's personnel protected by personal armor. Thus, it turns out that in comparison with other samples with similar characteristics and ammunition, the weapon loses by 100%, but at the same time it copes quite successfully with the tasks that are set for it. In addition, they say that it is quite realistic to shoot 1000 meters from this rifle, clenching teeth, but real. This is how it is cheap, cheerful, reliable and efficient, but, truth, without a reserve, for performing more complex tasks than those that are put before a weapon.

The total length of the weapon with the butt folded out is 1250 millimeters, with the length of the rifle barrel equal to 620 millimeters. The initial speed of a bullet fired from this barrel is 780 meters per second. The weight of the rifle is 6,5 kilogram without ammunition. It feeds weapons from a detachable magazine with an 10 capacity of 9,3x64 cartridges.

Large-caliber rifle SVDKThis cartridge in my opinion is a very interesting ammunition. First of all, the history is interesting in it, since the path that this cartridge went through before being put into service in the Russian army is very long. It all started in the 1910 year, it was then that Welhelm Brenneke created the 9,3x64 ammunition for the Mauser rifle with a sliding bolt. This cartridge was developed purely as a powerful hunting ammunition and not army. The main competitor of this cartridge was 9,3x62, which naturally won this ammunition, otherwise why would it be created. For a very long time, the cartridge was the favorite ammunition of those who hunted large animals. There were a lot of teddies shot by this ammunition, and in Africa many beasts were slaughtered with this powerful ammunition with a heavy bullet. This cartridge retains its popularity even now, and how many weapons under it were released by various weapon companies could not be counted.

In 1986, the son of the famous designer Blum developed a domestic version of this cartridge, the same for hunting. The bullet of the cartridge weighed 17,3-17,5 gram, the kinetic energy, as well as the speed, did not vary within very large limits - 4760-5130 Joules. A year later, the first batch of these munitions was manufactured, but they went into mass production a little later.

Actually, on the basis of this cartridge and was developed ammunition for a sniper rifle. True, many people believe that it was not the domestic hunting ammunition that was taken as a basis, but foreign, but we will not start a dispute from scratch. One way or another, the civilian cartridge and the combat cartridge are different ammunition.

The bullet of the live cartridge 9,3х64 has a weight of 16,6 grams, it has a steel core. In the trunk of the SVDK, this bullet accelerates to a speed of almost 800 meters per second, respectively, its kinetic energy is somewhere around the 5000 Joule. The ammunition is designed primarily for the effective destruction of enemy personnel, protected by means of individual armor protection, as well as firing on unarmored vehicles. At a distance in 100 meters, the bullet of the cartridge 9,3х64 in 80% of shots pierces a sheet of steel measuring one centimeter thick.

In 2006, this cartridge was adopted along with the SVDK rifle. The designation of this munition received 9СН, index 7НХNUMX.

Thus, it is safe to say that the SVDK and the 9СН cartridge cannot be compared with the .338 Lapua Magnum cartridge and the weapon under it at all. And this is not at all due to the fact that domestic ammunition and rifle lose in such a comparison, but because the requirements of not high-precision long-range sniper weapons were laid in the design of our weapon, but quite different. You can often find a negative opinion about this weapon, but no one scolds the Glock pistol for the fact that it cannot hit the target at a distance of 1000 meters. So why then make demands that are clearly above the challenges facing the weapon?

Well, how much this rifle is comparable to a large-caliber sniper complex with a small unmasking action “Exhaust”, let everyone decide for himself.



31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    21 January 2013 10: 21
    It's great that our gunsmiths are mastering new ammunition and producing weapons for it.
    1. Hon
      +6
      21 January 2013 10: 59
      Quote: Bulls.
      It's great that our gunsmiths are mastering new ammunition and producing weapons for it.

      Come on. Blinded on his knee, accuracy in two angular minutes exceeded, although it is accepted for service, it has not received distribution.
      1. +5
        21 January 2013 11: 58
        It seems to me that it is not so much in the rifle as in the cartridge. On the box you can write "Sniper", but the quality of this ammunition will not increase.
        1. Demon_Ex
          +3
          21 January 2013 12: 42
          Quite right, we have not so many cartridges .. Sniper 12.7 is issued very little, and for real work. Cartridges from Eastern Europe, also a frank g .. Many of the elephant-killers are engaged in self-driving. Fortunately, equipment kits can be bought over the Internet. I know at least two snipers who with their ammunition from KSVK fit into 0.8-1 MOA. Unfortunately, I can not say anything about the modified Brenneke. Again, most likely an attempt to develop a cartridge type LM.
          1. Denzel13
            0
            21 January 2013 18: 19
            I do not know how now, but earlier "on the knee" more than one ammunition was made (including the "finalization with a file" laughing )
            1. Demon_Ex
              0
              22 January 2013 02: 10
              Now it is much simpler, just experiment with weights. smile I’m doing reload myself.
        2. Hon
          +2
          21 January 2013 12: 44
          OSV-96 created as part of the same project, somehow but still fit in a minute, despite the use of machine-gun 12.7x108mm, which give dispersion
          1. Demon_Ex
            +2
            21 January 2013 13: 16
            By definition, a machine-gun cartridge does not make minutes, the average dispersion is 1,5 - 2 MOA. Take an un shot bullet, roll it on a flat surface and you will see its balance. The experience is certainly mediocre, but visual.
  2. Mopnex
    +2
    21 January 2013 10: 40
    Hmm ... I didn’t know such a rifle ... thanks.
  3. +1
    21 January 2013 13: 35
    It seems to me that SVDK is an unnecessary thing. Those tasks that were set before it can be solved with the help of 12.7 mm rifles, they even have machine-gun ammunition. And this model is essentially an intermediate link between the SVD and, for example, B 94. At the same time, a separate cartridge is needed for it, which, apart from SVDK, will not be suitable for other army trunks. Maybe SVDK has the right to exist, but in a limited amount.
    1. +3
      21 January 2013 13: 50
      It was just necessary not to work out, but to take .338 Lapua Magnum, to establish its normal high-quality production at home and make weapons for it. And then something went in a roundabout way to fill the niche between 7,62 and 12,7. Its own is certainly good, but only if it is equal and better in quality.
      1. +3
        21 January 2013 14: 27
        It was just necessary not to work out, but to take .338 Lapua Magnum, to establish its normal high-quality production at home and make weapons for it.

        Well, or at least buy cartridges, and there are barrels under 0.338 LM, the same SV-338M

      2. +1
        21 January 2013 18: 21
        Quote: scrabler
        to fill a niche between 7,62 and 12,7.


        Kirill, it does not seem to you that the range of tasks that should be solved by the SVDK complex, namely, the defeat of targets in body armor and unarmored vehicles, can be solved by other standard barrels. Moreover, the working distance is assumed to be within 600 m. SVDK wins over SVD in "armor-piercing "and for 12.7 mm barrels, in terms of weight and recoil. Perhaps these advantages deserve attention, but it seems to me not very practical to launch the production of both barrels and ammunition for such a narrow range of tasks. If we talk about 338 lpm, then I agree that this cartridge is needed, but not for the SVDK. Under it, you need to adopt a bolt gun to work at greater distances than the SVDK. Another option is to replace the 7.62x54 cartridge with 338 lpm and, accordingly, adopt not only the SVDK but also a machine gun for this cartridge. If you do this, then you will be able to expand the range of tasks to be solved. But this option will most likely not be affordable.
        1. +1
          25 January 2013 13: 55
          That's the point, which is expensive, because they took a cheap option, cut the scope of tasks and got what they got. After all, you need to fill in the gap with something. In general, it is now unclear what is happening with the adoption (Where are the full-fledged contests, where is at least a clearly formulated task for the designers? Madhouse.
  4. -1
    21 January 2013 14: 25
    I quote the author: "So why then present requirements that are obviously higher than the tasks facing the weapon?"
    I did not understand for what tasks the SVDK was created. I don't think the author himself knows this. But he advertises the rifle. I think that the tasks have already been solved, this is a combination of AK + SVD. With SVD, at one time I had to crawl - a very good unit! Can only make the SVD barrel a little heavier (thicker?) For more stability of the weapon at the moment when the bullet is still moving in the barrel. I myself am not "inflated black man", but run with the "screw" with a heavy barrel under the .308 Winchester and hands have not fallen off yet. And the sniper cartridges are better to do (I know that they will be more expensive, but victory is more important) And with the .338 Lapua Magnum cartridge and weapons for it, you can solve the same tasks, in terms of manpower, as with the 12.7 mm cartridge.
    1. 0
      21 January 2013 14: 41
      Yes, elementary tasks. The defeat of the enemy’s manpower protected by means of individual armor protection at medium distances. That's all smile
    2. -1
      21 January 2013 15: 01
      I will quote the author:
      first of all, for effective destruction of enemy manpower, protected by means of individual armor protection, as well as firing on unarmored vehicles.
  5. 0
    21 January 2013 14: 55
    the automation system is implemented through the removal of gunpowder gases from the bore of the barrel, it cannot be called freely suspended even with a big stretch. ,

    Warum? The piston is separated from the gate frame and moves freely in a short gas tube. There is no hard connection.
    1. 0
      21 January 2013 15: 33
      The difference is actually significant.
      1. 0
        21 January 2013 18: 35
        Quote: bunta
        Warum? The piston is separated from the gate frame and moves freely in a short gas tube. There is no hard connection.


        note that there is a gas pipe that increases stiffness and reduces barrel upward vibrations. all the same, it turns out not quite freely posted trunk.
        1. 0
          22 January 2013 03: 14
          Quote: bazilio
          a gas pipe that increases rigidity and reduces barrel vibrations up

          how?
          1. +1
            22 January 2013 18: 52
            Quote: bunta
            how?


            the attached GIF shows how the AK barrel bends when fired from the grenade launcher. When firing from the barrel itself, about the same happens to the latter. If you look closely, the gif shows that the trunk bends up a little more than down. This is due to the fact that the front attachment point of the grenade launcher is located slightly closer to the muzzle. If there were no grenade launcher, the barrel would bend down more, as the gas outlet tube prevents it from bending upwards.
            1. +1
              22 January 2013 19: 47
              Yes, this is understandable. Any additional mass on the console (barrel) or profile change will affect the deviation. The bottom line is that the resonance of such a system is constant. That is, the bend will always be in the same direction at the same distance and will not affect accuracy.
              In the case when the forearm touches the barrel, an inverse (spurious connection) is formed through it on the hand of the shooter, on the receiver. As a result, the internal cyclic frequency (resonance) of the system begins to depend not only on the mass of the barrel or its profile, but also on additional contacting masses. Plus temperature errors. As a result of all this, accuracy can float.
  6. +1
    21 January 2013 15: 06
    eeeeeeeeeeee, of course I respect the author for his work, but I kind of unsubscribed last time. See:
    1. the range is the same;
    2. the mass of rifles is almost the same;
    3. armor piercing is also almost the same.
    There is both a silencer and a flame arrester (not slotted) to the SVD, I have not heard of such gadgets to the SVDK, but logically they should be.
    If the weapons have almost the same characteristics, then it occupies one niche, well, that's purely my opinion:
    Well, how much this rifle is comparable to a large-caliber sniper complex with a small unmasking action “Exhaust”, let everyone decide for himself.
    1. +2
      21 January 2013 15: 38
      From "Exhaust" to 600 meters, this is the limit, and you need to make an allowance for a subsonic heavy bullet. Mass, but oh well, figs with it) By breaking through the means of individual protection "Exhaust" will be better, plus we add a higher stopping effect of the bullet. "Exhaust" is a special weapon. wink Do not agree)))
      1. 0
        22 January 2013 16: 05
        WELL TO SEE THOUGHTS DIFFERENTLY)
  7. +2
    21 January 2013 15: 07
    do you like to speculate without really understanding the issue, that's because of such hmm ..... experts, and on the "command" of the command, you have to drag the SV-98 mountains with you, although the contact distance over 150 meters cannot be found there, then about it they say that it is only suitable as firewood for a fire. Not all a sniper in a war consists of shooting at important targets of the enemy at a distance of 500 m to one and a half kilometers, sometimes it is necessary to shoot at 200 meters not all, unfortunately in the army, such specialists that can from a machine gun a tank to hit the triplex. Give you one ***** a rifle to shoot exactly at 2 km, not afraid of dirt, weighed little and a rapid-fire machine gun ............
    1. +1
      21 January 2013 15: 46
      C'mon) We know perfectly well that in the city of 150-200 meters this is essentially the limit for firing, since there is no open space over long distances. We also know about sniper weapons, which are designed for 100-150 meters and use 5,6 rimfire cartridges. They are intended for firing at light sources and so on. All these weapons are necessary and from the fact that they do not hit the squirrel in the eye at 2000 meters, they do not become bad. I actually wrote about this in the article that it is not necessary to present requirements to weapons that are higher than its tasks. Although, on the other hand, what shoots at a thousand shoots fast and at 100 meters, but here the question of weight, dimensions, and price in the end is.
      The question is that the gap between 7,62 and 12,7 does not fill our ammunition 9,3x64.
  8. borisst64
    0
    21 January 2013 15: 57
    It seems to me that the use of the "large-caliber" characteristic for a 9-mm cartridge is wrong. This is how it is necessary to write a 9-mm SVD, why play with muscles, this weapon does not have them.
    1. 0
      21 January 2013 16: 58
      Quote: borisst64
      It seems to me that the use of the "large-caliber" characteristic for the 9-mm cartridge is wrong.

      You don’t think so. Weapons up to 9mm inclusive considered a weapon of normal caliber. Over 9 mm - large-caliber.
  9. 0
    21 January 2013 21: 05
    Hmm, guys, you don’t understand something that is happening in our country:
    Once you read - everything is fine, everything is developing, it rises from its knees, so to speak.
    You read the next day - ... ass, sorry, impenetrable: everything falls, everything goes bankrupt, everything falls to hell.
    Oh, Mother Russia ...
  10. +1
    21 January 2013 22: 38
    Of course, I may not understand something ....
    But a self-loading sniper rifle in such a caliber ... Why?
    The bolt group will never allow to achieve sniper accuracy.
    And because of her weight 6,5 kg - drag that one.

    I think that a sniper rifle, especially in such a caliber, should be bolted.
    Here's an example carbine MC 19-09
    http://weaponland.ru/publ/mc_19_09_ckibovskij_krupnokalibernyj_karabin_pod_patro
    n_9_3kh64/9-1-0-1262

    Weight - 3,5 kg with the same caliber 6,3x64.
    It is clear that the army version will be heavier, but not 6,5 in any case.

    And, frankly, the 6,3x64 cartridge itself - originally a hunting one - is far from the best for sniper shooting in ballistics.

    In the end, in fact, what is difficult in making a normal bolted sniper under 0,338 LP?
    1. vladsolo56
      0
      22 January 2013 08: 04
      The experience of recent wars and conflicts shows that now the most popular weapon is sniper. It seems to me that the modern army should not be armed with machine guns, namely with sniper weapons, respectively, the soldiers should be trained as snipers, I can imagine if the company of snipers in which to put a pair of highly efficient machine guns, like the six-barrel Gatlink. such a company will be able to destroy any unit even at distant approaches. my opinion is that the era of the assault rifle is essentially already ending, the only special unit for fighting in the city where short-barreled weapons are more suitable, but there can’t be done without snipers.
      1. 0
        22 January 2013 12: 54
        I'm not special in shooting, but following your logic, melee also does not need to be trained - all snipers will be settled and machine gunners. Like a dash.
        1. vladsolo56
          0
          22 January 2013 16: 08
          hand-to-hand combat should always be, this is the basis of the fundamentals of the spirit of a fighter
      2. +1
        22 January 2013 16: 04
        in my opinion you are repeating the idea of ​​1920-1942 "every bullet on the target", and then the couple still switched to machine guns, although they were all armed with long-range weapons, not the whole world consists of the endless fields of Volgograd, there are still forests, mountains, etc. etc
        1. vladsolo56
          0
          22 January 2013 16: 13
          let it be known that in World War II the main infantry weapon was a rifle and only then PP, but again you should not compare rifles of that time with modern ones. By the way, in Stalingrad, it was the snipers who terrified the Germans, according to the effectiveness of the damage, no PP is compared with them. Yes, forests and mountains and rivers, and much more that is, but if there is a war, then there is certainly a front line. and here who more accurately and further beats that and wins
          1. Hon
            +1
            23 January 2013 08: 43
            Quote: vladsolo56
            let it be known that in WWII the main infantry weapon was a rifle and only then PP

            Actually, this can only be said about the first period of the war. In the future, the number of manufactured machines exceeded the number of rifles. This was due to the fact that PPSh was very simple and cheap to manufacture, which allowed it to quickly establish its mass production. In total, during the war years, about 6 million copies were produced.
            Quote: vladsolo56
            but again, do not compare rifles of the time and modern.

            Mosinka possessed the best ballistic characteristics in comparison with SVD, since it was a boltovik. Although the SVT of that time also surpasses the SVD in accuracy.
            Quote: vladsolo56
            By the way, in Stalingrad it was the snipers who terrified the Germans

            In Stalingrad, a lot of people were pointing out something, for example, Siberian hunters who were able to sneak up quietly, drove the Fritz to insanity. The most important and effective weapon of a soldier in the Battle of Stalingrad was precisely the PPSh, by the way the Germans also preferred it.
  11. +2
    23 January 2013 09: 27
    Quote: Hon
    By the way in Stalingrad it is snipers

    Why is it always like snipers so immediately Stalingrad ?!



    “Soon, somewhere between 5.30 and 7.30 in the morning, it became completely clear that the Russians were desperately fighting in the rear of our advanced units. Their infantry, with the support of 35 – 40 tanks and armored vehicles that appeared on the territory of the fortress, formed several centers of defense. Enemy snipers fired from behind trees, roofs and basements, causing heavy casualties among officers and junior commanders».
    (c) Robert Kershaw, "1941 through the eyes of the Germans. Birch crosses instead of iron ones."

    This is 22 June 1941 year. Brest Fortress.
    1. Hon
      +1
      23 January 2013 09: 36
      No one begs the merits and importance of snipers on the battlefield. It’s just a matter of retraining all infantrymen into snipers.
      1. vladsolo56
        0
        23 January 2013 09: 48
        If you calculate the direct damage in the battle from snipers, and from machine gunners, the result will not be in favor of the latter, and then, as I already wrote, with the required number of machine guns, the unit will be most effective.
        1. Hon
          +1
          23 January 2013 09: 59
          A sniper is part of a combat unit, he has his own tasks for a machine gunner, they cannot solve tasks of machine gunners of a sniper, just like machine gunners cannot solve tasks of snipers. Snipers need cover, it is provided by machine gunners. Over short distances, dense fire is needed, snipers cannot create it, sometimes it happens that the enemy is simply not visible, you have to shoot where it is supposed to be, again density and not accuracy are important here, and if the battle is conducted in the building, then sniper rifles why, you need a machine gun. And how to conduct an assault with only sniper weapons?
  12. SHOGUN
    0
    28 January 2013 13: 46
    Quote: Hon
    Come on. Blinded on his knee, accuracy in two angular minutes exceeded, although it is accepted for service, it has not received distribution.

    One-minute or less rifles serve a very narrow range of tasks. They are not needed in the military as a replacement for semi-automatic sniper rifles. This is too "gentle tool" that requires special preparation, + sights, rangefinders and other pribluda are needed for it. The practice of conducting modern battles shows that battles are fought at short and medium distances, rarely exceeding 50-500 meters. For these distances, the SVD-SVDK is quite suitable. It is not possible to shoot a villain who is hiding behind a hostage from it. And she is quite capable of killing or incapacitating a fighter at a distance of 50-500 meters. IMHO to injure, even worse than to kill, due to the need for treatment, care, insurance, surcharges, pensions and other garbage, requiring the state to spend some money on this fighter. Again, the reliability and unpretentiousness of SVD / K is several times higher. The cost and preparation time of a fighter is several times lower. In view of all of the above, the Americans also got hold of semi-automatic sniper rifles. So we are arguing about why they are needed? I think the "specialists" are to blame for this, who, they say, are not satisfied with the SVD and others ... It is understandable. tasks are different. But the SVD and its modifications as an army sniper rifle will live for a very long time. With which I congratulate everyone!
  13. Hunter 2-1
    0
    15 February 2013 18: 42
    Yes, our people could always do as others cannot do, not a single military conflict could have passed without our weapons. Thanks to those who make it! :)
  14. redwar6
    -1
    25 March 2013 21: 42
    It is a pity that only 9 mm caliber has been mastered. It is promising to make a 12,7 caliber rifle.
  15. 0
    20 June 2013 16: 45
    It is a pity that this rifle is used only in special. units, ordinary soldiers and run from the SVD.