People's Liberation Army of China - how to live within your means

22
People's Liberation Army of China - how to live within your means


Stand in places


China's official military budget is the National Defense section of the state budget. The state budget of the PRC is very similar to the Russian one and also consists of two parts: the budget of the central government and the consolidated budget of local governments.



The “National Defense” section is present in both parts of the PRC state budget. The bulk of official military spending (about 97%) comes from the central government budget, the rest from the consolidated budget of local governments.

In accordance with the classification of items of income and expenditure of the state budget of the People's Republic of China, under the section "National Defense" the budget of the central government finances the maintenance of regular troops of the PLA. This part of the costs includes the allowance of military personnel and wages of civil servants, financing of combat training and logistics support for troops, military R&D, purchases of weapons and military equipment - weapons and military equipment.

In addition to these main expense items, the section takes into account funds for the purchase of weapons and military equipment for reserve troops and people's militia, the construction of military facilities, and also, in part, the implementation of organizational and mobilization measures, including the organization of military conscription, mobilization preparation of industry, mobilization preparation of transport, construction of facilities civil defence.

The budgets of local governments under the section “National Defense” finance combat training and logistics of reserve troops and people’s militia, as well as part of the costs of organizing the conscription of military personnel and mobilization preparation of industry.


Costs – direct and not so


In China, as in other countries, the official military budget reflects only the amount of officially recognized direct military expenditures of the state. Part of the military costs is included in the “civilian” sections of the state budget and represents hidden military expenses.

To indicate the amount of all direct military expenditures of the state, the concept “Total military expenditures” is used, which is understood as the total fund of funds, including the official military budget and military expenditures passing through the “civilian” sections of the state budget.

In relation to China, the task of determining total military expenditures becomes significantly more complicated due to the continued secrecy of financial and economic statistics, especially in the military-economic sphere, as well as the presence of a fairly large volume of hidden financing of military activities.

It is carried out in the “civil” sections of the state budget. In the officially published government budget, military expenditures continue to be presented only by the total amount of China's official military expenditures under the heading "National Defense".

No details are provided for this section. However, an analysis of a number of Chinese regulatory documents and scientific articles in specialized military publications made it possible to reveal the composition and structure of China's military budget. In addition, in recent years, the civilian sections of the state budget have been presented in more detail, which makes it possible to identify military-oriented expenditures in non-military sections with higher reliability.

As a result of the analysis, it was established that the military budget does not represent a significant part of the costs for military R&D, part of the costs for the purchase of weapons and military equipment (in particular, the costs of purchasing weapons and military equipment for imports), capital construction of military facilities, expenses for mobile divisions of the People's Armed Militia (PAM) , pensions for discharged military personnel and some other expenses associated with military construction.

Expenses – civil, but also military


These expenses are included in the civil sections of the state budget, including the sections “Science and Technology”, “Social Security and Employment”, “Law Enforcement”, “Other Expenses”, etc. Thus, under the section “Science and Technology” from the budget The central government funds the National High Technology Research Program (Program 863), 58–60% of which is allocated to military R&D.


In addition, about 30% of the state program of basic research (Program 973) is spent on closed military-oriented research. In general, about 40% of expenditures from the central government budget under the “Science and Technology” section are allocated to military-oriented R&D.

Under the section “Social Security and Employment”, the central budget finances measures to ensure the military-economic supply of troops; maintaining the readiness of troops supply points, military staging points and preparing transport communications for use in the interests of the armed forces; payment of pensions to reserve and retired military personnel; providing benefits to conscripts and their families; employment of military personnel discharged from the armed forces.

Local budgets under this section finance part of the pensions for military personnel, financial provision of benefits for conscripts, a significant part of organizational and mobilization activities related to the conscription and training of reserve military personnel, as well as the construction of military facilities.

A significant part of the expenses going through the “civilian” sections of the state budget can be distributed according to their intended purpose for the maintenance of personnel, logistics of troops, procurement of weapons and military equipment and military R&D. At the same time, these costs are difficult to distribute among types of aircraft.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +29
    3 December 2023 08: 28
    What is the article all about? Instead of analysis, a set of general phrases. negative There have been a lot of such dummies at VO lately. sad
    1. +13
      3 December 2023 08: 46
      I wanted to ask the same thing myself) The man was given the task to write whatever he wanted about the Chinese military budget. He pulled from the network the first data he came across, which does not say anything, because it is nonsense, and based on it one cannot draw any conclusions about anything, and prepared an “article”
      However, for 300 rubles, a copy-paste machine simply cannot work hard; you cannot spend more than half an hour on this misery, otherwise you won’t be able to earn enough bread in a day)
    2. +1
      3 December 2023 09: 02
      Many authors do not realize that an Excel table can be saved as a regular image, and the site does not instruct them about this. Otherwise, the situation would be better with numbers and “analyses”.
      1. +4
        3 December 2023 09: 41
        We would like a few authors who at least know how to use Excel) They don’t, believe me) At the same time, they don’t need the numbers that they dig up on the Internet to increase the number of characters. The vast majority of site writers follow a predetermined theme with a predetermined conclusion. It is not in their power to substantiate something, so they do not derive fantastic “conclusions” from anywhere, but simply voice them. Numbers only bother them)
        1. 0
          3 December 2023 12: 34
          People's Liberation Army of China - how to live within your means
          It’s kind of disgusting when they start counting other people’s money. Count the dimes in your pocket.
        2. +1
          3 December 2023 15: 03
          If you wish, you can fill the text with interesting numbers and comparisons even without Excel; there is a regular desktop calculator, on your phone, on your computer. Desire is needed, understanding of what, how, where to calculate.
          1. +1
            5 December 2023 08: 29
            Quote: ycuce234-san
            you can saturate the text with interesting numbers

            The problem is that the numbers are not at all interesting. Well, at least to those who seriously pay attention to them. Your humanitarian “saturation” only infuriates.
            People who know how to think are interested in CONCLUSIONS. The person brought Excel as a means to draw conclusions, compare numbers with each other, draw conclusions based on comparison, add their knowledge of the general situation, and draw some conclusions.
            Your comparisons are interesting, this is not an analytical article, this is ordinary humanitarian nonsense. In fact, it has nothing to do with the topic at hand, with analysis and thinking. Just a meaningless picture.
            This approach for the site, as I understand it, is a thing of the past. The idea of ​​“correctly lying” to the people won. As usual, the authorities about the people are far back in the last century.
  2. +13
    3 December 2023 08: 39
    Such a promising title and...
    1. +7
      3 December 2023 08: 49
      Quote: Doccor18
      Such a promising title and...

      In my opinion, the problem is that topics that require special knowledge are taken on by “writers” who know nothing about them. Another question is, where is the site’s editors looking? Publications of such a low level are a clear disrespect for readers! am
      1. +8
        3 December 2023 08: 51
        Quote: Tucan
        Another question is, where are the site editors looking?

        Quantity beats quality...
        This has already been discussed earlier; monetization of advertising dictates mass appeal.
        1. +1
          3 December 2023 08: 58
          Quote: Doccor18
          Quote: Tucan
          Another question is, where are the site editors looking?

          Quantity beats quality...
          This has already been discussed earlier; monetization of advertising dictates mass appeal.

          But there are also normal authors. I read with pleasure today Shpakovsky’s article about “Sturmgever”. It would not be bad if the size of the author’s fee correlated not only with the number of views (there are frankly crazy publications with a large number of views), but also with positive ratings from readers. But for now, I can sadly state that the quality of materials on VO is declining.
          1. +6
            3 December 2023 09: 06
            Quote: Tucan
            Shpakovsky's article about "Sturmgever".

            Only the article was not stated about Sturmgever, but about the viability of a certain concept. What kind of concept it was, who tested it and with what, Shpakovsky, as usual, remained silent. He listed everyone he quickly found who was developing automatic weapons except Fedorov, thereby “depriving Fedorov of priority” and calmed down, satisfied. I didn’t even remember about all sorts of concepts there)
            1. +3
              3 December 2023 09: 37
              Quote: Mikhail3
              Only the article was not stated about Sturmgever, but about the viability of a certain concept. What kind of concept it was, who tested it and with what, Shpakovsky, as usual, remained silent. He listed everyone he quickly found who was developing automatic weapons except Fedorov, thereby “depriving Fedorov of priority” and calmed down, satisfied. I didn’t even remember about all sorts of concepts there)

              Regarding the concept, Shpakovsky writes very controversial things. But his style is not bad, and he talks about the post-war use of the machine gun. Although there was an article by another author on this topic relatively recently. As for me, it’s better to argue with Shpakovsky, who, by the way, actively communicates with readers, than to see Yagodka’s hack work.
      2. +5
        3 December 2023 09: 03
        Quote: Tucan
        Another question is, where are the site editors looking?

        To the budget. Which apparently has somewhere to spend other than hiring specialists. Specialists are expensive.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +1
    3 December 2023 09: 13
    oh, it seems to me that the Chinese are keeping a considerable part of the military budget in the shadows
    1. 0
      5 December 2023 08: 36
      Quote: Graz
      oh, it seems to me that the Chinese are keeping a considerable part of the military budget in the shadows

      Everyone does it) It would be very strange if they didn’t. We need to dig here. This article needs to be done for at least a couple of weeks, collect extensive open statistics, compare it with data on the production of types of weapons, read other people's articles on the topic, draw conclusions from all this... There is a lot of work. For 300 rubles?)
  4. +2
    3 December 2023 10: 00
    Officially, the military budget is several times smaller than the American one. And the pace of military construction in general and naval construction in particular is much higher. Hence the conclusion - official military spending is only the tip of the iceberg, even taking into account the cost of production in China and the peculiarities of military pricing in the United States. There are no specifics in the article, but I have summarized the general principle in a couple of sentences. That's why it's not interesting
  5. +1
    3 December 2023 19: 10
    You will be surprised, but there is a PLA news site on Telega, I subscribed to it. Very informative and most importantly professional.
    1. 0
      3 December 2023 21: 25
      Quote: Mikhail Maslov
      Telege has a PLA news website, I subscribe to it

      The Chinese threat is even better
  6. 0
    20 February 2024 11: 39
    This and that, but in fact nothing.
    At least they wrote about the J-20 and J-31 fighters that they do not have engines that support supersonic flight without afterburner. And so they move to class 4+++.
  7. 0
    2 March 2024 18: 47
    It's translated :)
    But! Hm... "No matter what physicists come up with, they will still end up with a bomb." It's about R&D. And it’s not for us to criticize our colleagues. Damn, we need to admire our colleagues there. Especially considering their specific approach to persons involved in the issue of lobbying and corruption :)
  8. 0
    17 March 2024 13: 15
    Beautiful flag. I would return it.