SIA Mod. 1918 – as if created specifically for the novel

115
SIA Mod. 1918 – as if created specifically for the novel
Italian machine gun SIA Mod. 1918


“And it was Boris who insisted
and Savva Evgrafovich approved,
to part weapons hide it from his basement
in his barn, why did the guys dig there
quite a deep hole, lowered into it
an iron tank for rainwater standing in the yard,
and hid a Maxim machine gun in it
with several boxes of cartridges
and a whole box of German fragmentation grenades.
Each one was filled with paraffin on top for reliability.
the machine gun was carefully lubricated and tied with a tarpaulin
with some kind of water-repellent English impregnation.
The cache was covered from above with a piece of roofing iron.
and laid the floor from planks.”

“Three from Ensk” (book one).
Battle group "Iron Horse". Author's book

Weapon stories. What kind of jokes does our life play on us? It’s just that sometimes you’re amazed. Here's this one story one of those that, as they say, you can’t imagine even when heavily drunk, and it lasted for a lifetime.



And it so happened that in my distant childhood I received a whole set of “Science and Technology” magazines from 1929. I really enjoyed looking at them, especially the articles in the “Military Equipment” section. And in one of them, dedicated to the history of the development of small arms, I came across an image of an Italian SIA light machine gun


Here is this page and on it is a drawing depicting an Italian soldier carrying this machine gun on his back

But in the text itself, absolutely nothing was said about this machine gun. And it was very sad. Because I really liked it and wanted to make it.

We, the boys from Proletarskaya Street, at that time had a lot of homemade weapons: rifles made of boards with a bolt made of a latch, homemade pistols, also sawn and planed, machine guns “with a stick” (magazine), and then suddenly I would have a “real " machine gun.

I figured out how to make it: the barrel is a handle from an old broom, the “rings” on the barrel are made from… curtain rings (!), everything else is from “planks”. I just didn’t know what kind of ammunition it had. And there was another problem - there wasn’t enough money to buy so many rings. But I would have bought it, no matter what, if I had known that this machine gun was powered not from a belt, but from an arc magazine! And then I look - the handles are like those of the Maxim, well that means - and it shoots, like the Maxim, also with a tape!

Alas, this is the lack of complete knowledge. And there was no one to ask then, and nowhere to read it either. I had to do “Maxim”, but that’s another story, but in this case our story is about the Italian SIA.

And then it happened that from all these magazines of 1929 I only had this page left. And, naturally, I never contacted her again.

But in 2005, I decided to write the historical novel “Three from Ensk”, the first book of which was almost entirely written based on the memories of my closest relatives, who told me in childhood about the events of the Civil War, and a lot was gleaned from the magazines “Niva” and the Penza regional archive. However, the novel planned not one, but three books, and the last one was supposed to take place in the present day. And one of his heroes had to dig up a machine gun buried in 1918 and... use it in 2005!

Well, out of the simplicity of my soul, in the first novel I took and “buried” a Maxim machine gun in the ground there. And everything was fine until I started writing the third part. And there it turned out that the person who tore off this machine gun simply could not cope with the Maxim! This was not the kind of “machine” that, after lying, even in oil, for so many years in the ground, it would easily “give itself up” to a person completely unfamiliar with such a weapon. He simply wouldn’t have taken it apart to clean it of grease, and having taken it apart, he wouldn’t have put it back together!

And that’s when I came across information about this Italian machine gun, and... a page from a magazine - everything is the same! True, when all this fell into my hands, a small edition of the novel had already been printed, and nothing could be corrected. So it turned out that in the first book the heroes hide exactly “Maxim”, and in the third - for some reason they find SIA.

If I ever have time for another reprint, I will definitely correct this. Because everything turned out very well: the machine gun is much simpler than the Maxim, and it has store-bought food, in a word - it turned out to be much easier for my hero to handle it.

Well, now about this little-known machine gun of the Italian army during the First World War.

SIA Mod. 1918


SIA Mod. The 1918 was the first Italian air-cooled light machine gun. Developed at the end of the First World War, it was used in limited numbers during the final months of hostilities and was intended to replace the primitive Villar Perosa machine gun in the event of a possible continuation of hostilities.

In April 1916, with the appearance on the Italian front of small units equipped with these strange machine guns, the foundations were laid for new combat tactics aimed at breaking the pattern of "trench warfare" that seemed to have no end. Now, Italian soldiers armed with these weapons were instructed to infiltrate in small groups, covered by their fire, across the line of combat contact and burst into the enemy trenches with pistols and grenades in their hands.


An Italian soldier with an SIA machine gun on his back. Wartime photography

However, the Villar Perosa was not very successful for fire support of such units due to the weakness of its Glizenti pistol cartridge. That is why, in January 1918, Colonel Abiel Bethel Revelli from Beaumont - who created this weapon - offered the military another machine gun, chambered for 6,5x52-mm Mannlicher-Carcano cartridges and with exactly the same air cooling as the his previous "Revelly".

But the military liked the second model and was put into production under the name SIA - an abbreviation consisting of the initials of the manufacturing company, that is, the Italian Aviation Society in Turin. Like the Villar Perosa, the SIA was primarily intended to arm small combat units, but it also found use as an aircraft machine gun, without a radiator.

The original plan called for each company to be equipped with 8 SIA machine guns (2 for each platoon), for a total of approximately 18. At the first stage, it was necessary to replace all the Villar Perosa machine guns, and at the second, increase their number to a certain number.

However, the war soon ended, so this plan could not be carried out. Nevertheless, this machine gun was also used during the Second World War, at least until the summer of 1943, when it was armed with the rear units of the territorial defense and the volunteer national security militia. Finally, it should be remembered that it was used as the main weapon on a light tank “Fiat 3000”, as well as in the role of the already mentioned aircraft machine gun.


Appearance of the SIA machine gun. The handles, magazine receiver and cooling radiator on the barrel are clearly visible

The SIA was a light machine gun, automatic, operated by the recoil of the barrel, 1 mm long (with a flash suppressor) and weighing 160 kg without the machine. The barrel, made of chromium-nickel steel, 10,7 mm long and weighing 660 kg, was cooled by a radiator composed of 4,75 round aluminum rosettes, compressed by a locking ring; the cooling system constructed in this way guaranteed a maximum burst length of 52 shots.

The box magazine was curved, double-row, made of sheet steel and held 50 rounds of 6,5 mm caliber. When loaded, it weighed about 2 kg and was inserted into a receiver on the top of the receiver. It is believed that this location of the magazine makes it easier for the enemy to identify the machine gunner's position.

In general, the reliability of the weapon turned out to be insufficient. The sighting system had a rotating rear sight, hinged on the left side of the receiver and having three radial sights corresponding to distances of 300, 700 and 1 meters.

The machine gun's rate of fire was 500–700 rds/min. Initial bullet speed: 700 m/s. Sighting range: 800–900 m. Maximum bullet range: 3 m.

The two handles and the trigger between them were similar to those used on the Villar-Peroz. The machine gun had a weight of about 5,6 kg reinforced with a wooden (!) tripod, which could be folded for carrying on the shoulder. Thus, the weight of the unloaded machine gun, including the tripod, was 16,3 kg.

In general, quite a bit compared to the same “Maxim”. Nevertheless, this machine gun did not make any difference, and in my novel it actually jammed after the first few shots!
115 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    21 November 2023 05: 42
    Thank you, you know how to find something interesting in the ordinary, even if your soul rests after reports from the front
    1. +1
      21 November 2023 07: 16
      Quote: novel xnumx
      Thank you, you know how to find something interesting in the ordinary, even if your soul rests after reports from the front

      And thank you for your kind words! But... they cost you two minuses. “Fighters with Shpakovsky” are not asleep!
      1. +2
        21 November 2023 07: 26
        Like in that movie - “I spat on everyone!”
        1. -1
          21 November 2023 08: 02
          Quote: novel xnumx
          Like in that movie - “I spat on everyone!”

          Touchingly unanimous in opinion!
        2. 0
          21 November 2023 10: 17
          Like in that movie - “I spat on everyone!”


          Aren't you afraid of drowning?
          1. +1
            21 November 2023 12: 01
            No, I’m not afraid, because I don’t intend to adjust my opinion to the incomprehensible majority
            1. +5
              21 November 2023 12: 41
              No, I’m not afraid, because I don’t intend to adjust my opinion to the incomprehensible majority


              Yes, no one has canceled the right to opinion, there is no need to spit.
              And yes, you have to be picky.
      2. AUL
        -1
        21 November 2023 13: 28
        Quote: kalibr
        And thank you for your kind words! But... they cost you two minuses. “Fighters with Shpakovsky” are not asleep!

        Vyacheslav Olegovich, it’s not a fact that these disadvantages apply to you. Rather, this is for Roman. There are several participants on the forum who do not rate a comment, but give a minus, without reading, to a specific person. A kind of anonymous vendetta. I have two “blood members” who downvote any of my posts. True, one has recently started to net something, it is not always noted. Hey, friend, stop messing around, let's downvote! laughing
        So, Vyacheslav Olegovich, don’t pay attention to all sorts of pointless attacks, you write great and on an interesting topic. I always enjoy reading you.
        1. -1
          21 November 2023 14: 07
          Quote from AUL
          Don’t pay attention to all sorts of pointless attacks, you write great and on an interesting topic.

          Alexander Yurievich! Thank you for your support. I appreciate it. But... I’ll tell you another professional secret (I revealed the first to Vladimir) - I don’t convert, even when it seems that I do. This is the job. You need to show that this makes you a little angry. You are a person, not a log... Many wrestlers like this and they write... write... write... As you can see, I am also outrageously truthful and cynical.
      3. 0
        26 November 2023 21: 41
        But in 2005, I decided to write the historical novel “Three from Ensk”, the first book of which was almost entirely written based on the memories of my closest relatives, who told me in childhood about the events of the Civil War, and a lot was gleaned from the magazines “Niva” and the Penza regional archive. However, the novel planned not one, but three books, and the last one was supposed to take place in the present day. And one of his heroes had to dig up a machine gun buried in 1918 and... use it in 2005!

        Well, out of the simplicity of my soul, in the first novel I took and “buried” a Maxim machine gun in the ground there. And everything was fine until I started writing the third part. And there it turned out that the person who tore off this machine gun simply could not cope with the Maxim! This was not the kind of “machine” that, after lying, even in oil, for so many years in the ground, it would easily “give itself up” to a person completely unfamiliar with such a weapon. He simply wouldn’t have taken it apart to clean it of grease, and having taken it apart, he wouldn’t have put it back together!


        In the novel “Slavik on the Sofa”...
        Name the city in whose museum there is a “Maxim” dug up by the boys in 1959?
        And it was buried only in 1942. “The bit is not painted”... They just buried a couple of parts from it somewhere else.
        Just like that, this machine gun appeared in the housekeepers’ gazebo very early in the morning. The police arrived at about five in the afternoon, when the men had already returned from work. And they found a machine gunner, a real one, a front-line one. And the verdict was as simple as two kopecks: cast yourself a cast iron or tin one... Return it to Tula, they will repair it there. The cartridges are real, yes, the tape, although rotten, is real.

        What is the degree of novelty and authenticity of the article on this bearded story?
      4. 0
        26 November 2023 21: 59
        I figured out how to make it: the barrel is a handle from an old broom, the “rings” on the barrel are made from… curtain rings (!), everything else is from “planks”. I just didn’t know what kind of ammunition it had. And there was another problem - there wasn’t enough money to buy so many rings. But I would have bought it, no matter what, if I had known that this machine gun was powered not from a belt, but from an arc magazine! And then I look - the handles are like those of the Maxim, well that means - and it shoots, like the Maxim, also with a tape!


        Well, I don’t believe that all penzyuks and penzyuks are stupid people...
        I hadn’t gone to school yet, but I already distinguished Shosha from Lewis and didn’t confuse nutrition with DP. The DS-39 was distinguished from the SG-43 by the sound of the shot, even without seeing the machine gun firing.
        I dug a little as I grew up... On that very “Barvenkovsky ledge” - “Peaceful Valley”. The grinding of iron on iron - I remember it well.
  2. +4
    21 November 2023 08: 04
    6,5x52mm Mannlicher-Carcano cartridges

    Just a new caliber of the US Army (Caliber 6,8x51) The Italians knew something)
    1. 0
      21 November 2023 08: 47
      There was somewhere, a special caliber for the Alps, where the soldiers are tightly dressed, and the bullet must have sufficient speed to penetrate
  3. +7
    21 November 2023 09: 29
    it was used as the main weapon on the Fiat 3000 light tank



    1. +6
      21 November 2023 09: 38
      it was used as the main weapon on the Fiat 3000 light tank


  4. +3
    21 November 2023 09: 50
    rifles made from boards with a bolt made from a latch, homemade pistols, also sawn and planed, machine guns “with a stick” (magazine)

    Oh, this is a whole topic .. To the above I can add “pistols” that were poured from lead into the simplest clay molds. Lead was taken from old batteries or the shells of pieces of old cables, and melted in cans right in the yard. They also made “arsons” and crossbows. And there seemed to be purchased toys - some revolvers made of bright plastic, sabers and pistols, but they were hopelessly “toy-like”. But we wanted “real” weapons. That's what they did. The result was some kind of skeletal symbol, but while you are making it, it acquires flesh, with the help of your imagination. And in preschool age I remember a tin scarecrow, bought by my father from a junk dealer, with deafeningly banging clay plugs, with a leather holster sewn by my mother from a piece of old suede. It was a wild delight, although at first I could not even independently cock the tight spring of the cylinder with the striker into which the screw, which was the trigger, was screwed. They cocked the gun for me, I loaded the revolver, and rushed through three steps into the street to shoot, because everyone in the apartment was already sick of everyone with this roar, and the “cartridges” would have run out much faster).
    Then factory pistols with paper caps appeared, but after the deafening “traffic jams” it was not interesting to shoot them from such a pistol. And what’s surprising is that it seemed to be both “iron” and black, but it was not included in the game. Some of my own crafts fit into the game, this “black pistol” did not.
    1. 0
      21 November 2023 09: 51
      "black pistol" - no.[/quote]
      There was my article on this topic here on the site: “Weapons of the Soviet child.”
      1. 0
        21 November 2023 11: 47
        Quote: kalibr

        There was my article on this topic here on the site: “Weapons of the Soviet child.”

        I can't find it now, unfortunately.
        1. -1
          21 November 2023 12: 01
          Quote from cpls22
          (Dmitriy)

          The most surprising thing is that I didn’t find it either. But it was. I found "Diseases of the Soviet Child". Did the weapon go somewhere or am I getting the name wrong?
    2. AUL
      0
      21 November 2023 13: 06
      Quote from cpls22
      To the above I can add “pistols”, which were poured from lead into the simplest clay molds.

      And in addition to the above, we also turned pistols out of marl! It was collected on the Chalk Mountains in Kursk. The work was long and painstaking, but it was possible, with some effort, to grind out a very plausible copy of a real “pestle.” Yes, if you paint it with mascara... True, they were very short-lived - they pricked when hit.
  5. +13
    21 November 2023 10: 19
    SIA was a light machine gun, with automatic operation driven by the recoil of the barrel

    Alas, Vyacheslav Olegovich, but you were seriously mistaken. The SIA model 1918 machine gun has a semi-blowback with a slow rotation. His trunk is motionless.
    This design was a major source of problems and accidents. It got to the point that in the twin installation of the FIAT 3000 tank it was prescribed to fire only one machine gun, having the second one in reserve in case the first one broke down.
    In 1936, Società Anonima Revelli Manifattura Armiguerra tried to modernize the SIA model 1918 machine gun and eliminate the problems, creating the SIA Mod.1938.



    There are no fundamental differences in design. In the new machine gun, the barrel was shortened and made replaceable, a stock was added and changes were made to the design of the bolt, reducing the rate of fire by almost half, to 400 rounds per minute, which significantly increased the reliability of the weapon. But the machine gun did not go into production.



    Internals of the SIA Mod.1938 machine gun. SIA model 1918 has almost the same.

    By the way, the SIA model 1918 machine gun managed to appear in films - in the 1963 Italian comedy film “The Shortest Day”. Moreover, as an aviation one.

    1. +6
      21 November 2023 10: 49
      Alas, Vyacheslav Olegovich, but you were seriously mistaken. The SIA model 1918 machine gun has a semi-blowback with a slow rotation. His trunk is motionless.


      What have you done, dear? You told a lot more about the machine gun, even the author of the opus.
      However, I didn’t set such a task for myself. The main thing there was to talk about your children's crafts, but to attract attention to your book creations, apparently the problem is with readers.
      And the machine gun is just a decoration.
      1. 0
        21 November 2023 11: 08
        Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
        And the machine gun is just a decoration.

        You, Vovochka, did not answer me where I can read your articles, and whether the VO audience can expect them here from you.
        1. +1
          21 November 2023 11: 22
          You, Vovochka, did not answer me where I can read your articles, and whether the VO audience can expect them here from you.


          Slavik, why? I don’t consider this site as a resource for publications; whoever needs it, knows it. bully
          1. +2
            21 November 2023 12: 02
            Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
            he knows.

            Well, no, and there is no trial. But everything is learned by comparison.
            1. +3
              21 November 2023 12: 28
              Well, no, and there is no trial. But everything is learned by comparison.

              We've already had enough, here's an example:
              https://dzen.ru/media/id/5ac0950fd7bf2113e95daebd/neskolko-slov-o-puskah-ptur-5f7ae3a771c44f0829c2cde1
              And what did you understand having a humanities education? lol
              1. -1
                21 November 2023 13: 16
                Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                Well, no, and there is no trial. But everything is learned by comparison.

                We've already had enough, here's an example:
                https://dzen.ru/media/id/5ac0950fd7bf2113e95daebd/neskolko-slov-o-puskah-ptur-5f7ae3a771c44f0829c2cde1
                And what did you understand having a humanities education? lol

                No need to be so nervous! So you won’t have any nerves. You need to be calmer and look at everything with humor. I'll take a look, maybe I'll understand something.
                1. -4
                  21 November 2023 13: 33
                  Quote: kalibr
                  And what did you understand having a humanities education?

                  You know, Vladimir, I understood everything about helicopters. Moreover, I will “make you happy”. I will rewrite this article of yours according to the meaning one to one. But the novelty according to the Advego Plagiatus system is not lower than 92%. After which I will publish it as my own. At this level of novelty, right? And, of course, I will write to you where you can read it. There will be laughter, yes! VO for everything. And it will be like this - here it is, the elbow is close, but you won’t bite! This will be a lesson for you on how to contact a journalist with my experience.
                  1. +9
                    21 November 2023 13: 55
                    Quote: kalibr
                    I will rewrite this article of yours according to the meaning one to one. But the novelty according to the Advego Plagiatus system is not lower than 92%. After which I will publish it as my own

                    good laughing good

                    Quote: kalibr
                    This will be a lesson for you on how to contact a journalist with my experience

                    Shpakovsky, what does journalism have to do with it? What you described has been known since ancient times under the little respected word “plagiarism.” Or "this is different"?
                    1. -3
                      21 November 2023 15: 33
                      Quote: Repellent
                      Or "is it different"?

                      And you are there... Well, what a day today is... Two people are directly flaunting their ignorance. Plagiarism is when it is rewritten ONE TO ONE WITHOUT INDICATION OF THE AUTHOR. “Lukomorye has a green oak tree...” - V. Ivanov - PLAGIARISM. “There is a place called Lukomorye, which is famous for the fact that a huge old oak tree grows there” - this is a rewrite. Do you see the difference? Why did I write about the Advego system? At HE the level of novelty is accepted to be above 70%. In AST publishing house - 75%. I set the bar for myself at 92%. What kind of plagiarism are we talking about?
                      1. +8
                        21 November 2023 15: 49
                        Quote: kalibr
                        What kind of plagiarism are we talking about?

                        About direct. Once again, what you are writing about is called rewriting. The same plagiarism, but slightly camouflaged and not officially prosecuted.
                      2. -4
                        21 November 2023 16: 39
                        Quote: Repellent
                        About direct. Once again, what you are writing about is called rewriting. The same plagiarism, but slightly camouflaged and not officially prosecuted.

                        And the last thing is most important. Everything that the law allows is EVERYTHING POSSIBLE!
                      3. +6
                        21 November 2023 16: 24
                        At HE the level of novelty is accepted to be above 70%. In AST publishing house - 75%. I set the bar for myself at 92%. What kind of plagiarism are we talking about?

                        This is all purely individual. I knew a character who bought a Rolex watch on Beijing Road Shopping and was happy. This is the bar the man has set.
                      4. +3
                        21 November 2023 20: 58
                        How did you write? There is a place called Lukomorye that does what? "To be famous"? Well, you are a professional rewriter on Advego...
                  2. +5
                    21 November 2023 15: 03
                    You know, Vladimir, I understood everything about helicopters. Moreover, I will “make you happy”. I will rewrite this article of yours according to the meaning one to one. But the novelty according to the Advego Plagiatus system is not lower than 92%. After which I will publish it as my own. At this level of novelty, right? And, of course, I will write to you where you can read it. There will be laughter, yes! VO for everything. And it will be like this - here it is, the elbow is close, but you won’t bite! This will be a lesson for you on how to contact a journalist with my experience.


                    Do you think you'll be the first to steal something from me? As they say, get in line! laughing
                    You are not the first, you are not the last. I’ve been looking at this with irony for a long time; theft is also a kind of recognition.
                    Moreover, my original source with the date of publication will not go anywhere.
                    1. -7
                      21 November 2023 15: 38
                      Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                      Moreover, my original source with the date of publication will not go anywhere.

                      The second one, Vladimir, sorry, is stupid, like the Repellent in front of you. Nobody is going to steal anything from you. And no one cares about the original document with the date. No one will even notice that... the source is yours. And the Advego Anti-Plagiarism System will show 92% of novelty. Novelty is what matters. It doesn’t matter what is written, what’s important is that it’s accessible, interesting, simple—and that it’s novel.
                      1. +6
                        21 November 2023 15: 43
                        Quote: kalibr
                        The Advego Antiplagiarism system will show 92% of novelty. Novelty is what matters

                        Shpakovsky, you don’t have to be a journalist to pass this test. Rewriting techniques are known and have been described repeatedly and comprehensively. You and journalism are never related, you are not even of the same biological species, excuse me.

                        Quote: kalibr
                        It doesn’t matter what is written, it’s important that it’s accessible, interesting, simple - and that it’s new

                        A marvelous recipe for a successfully sold hack. One hundred two percent, I would say good laughing
                      2. -3
                        21 November 2023 16: 40
                        Quote: Repellent
                        A marvelous recipe for a successfully sold hack. One hundred two percent, I would say

                        The main thing in your philippic is the word WONDERFUL.
                      3. -2
                        21 November 2023 16: 47
                        Quote: Repellent
                        You and journalism are never related, you are not even of the same biological species, excuse me.

                        You think so out of malice, but in reality your account is worthless. Who are you to judge this? Head of the Russian Union of Journalists?
                      4. +5
                        21 November 2023 17: 14
                        Quote: kalibr
                        Your account is worthless

                        Well, what do I care about a seasoned rewriter? But you and journalism, ahem... see above, in short.

                        Quote: kalibr
                        Who are you to judge this?

                        I am one of many who are able to distinguish a writer (and even a journalist) from copywriters, rewriters and other nonsense. It's simple, in fact, just try it - and you will succeed too. Exactly Yes laughing
                      5. -4
                        21 November 2023 17: 51
                        Quote: Repellent
                        I am one of many who are able to distinguish a writer (and even a journalist) from copywriters, rewriters and other nonsense. It's simple, in fact, just try it - and you will succeed too.

                        I'm very happy for you! But the main thing for me is that you continue to visit VO and read our materials. This is all that we would like to receive from you. All your other talents do not concern us, unless you yourself want to write something for us. Then - please.
                      6. +9
                        21 November 2023 16: 01
                        It doesn’t matter what is written, what’s important is that it’s accessible, interesting, simple—and that it’s novel.

                        Oh, I suspect it will turn out something surreal - a deep historian will rewrite an article about the tactics of using helicopters to fight tanks with 92 percent novelty. Pablo Picasso nervously smokes on the sidelines with his abstract ass painting.
                      7. -4
                        21 November 2023 16: 43
                        Quote: Dekabrist
                        deep historian

                        Since when am I a “very old man”, “offend my dear”. Now old age officially begins at 75 years old. The period from 60 to 74 years is considered elderly, senile from 75 to 89, and then comes the word “deep”.
                      8. +6
                        21 November 2023 17: 16
                        Quote: kalibr
                        Quote: Dekabrist
                        dickey historian

                        Since when am I "deep" old man"

                        Md request lol
                      9. +1
                        21 November 2023 16: 36
                        The second one, Vladimir, sorry, is stupid, like the Repellent in front of you. Nobody is going to steal anything from you. And no one cares about the original document with the date. No one will even notice that... the source is yours. And the Advego Anti-Plagiarism System will show 92% of novelty. Novelty is what matters. It doesn’t matter what is written, what’s important is that it’s accessible, interesting, simple—and that it’s novel.


                        So, in order to change the text, you also need to understand the issue. Otherwise it will just be nonsense.
                      10. -4
                        21 November 2023 17: 06
                        Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                        So, in order to change the text, you also need to understand the issue. Otherwise it will just be nonsense.

                        Without any doubt! But I can do it, I’ve also copied more complex materials. I have been writing regularly since 1977. Taught others how to write. But you still have it written at the high school level. This is Zen... Anyone, by the way - there is an address - can read it and make sure. Why did I ask you to show me a sample? Here's to it! So that you can compare. I think now many readers of this material are reading your material there, on Zen.
                      11. +1
                        21 November 2023 19: 33
                        Without any doubt! But I can do it, I’ve also copied more complex materials.


                        Nope, it won't work. There is no way to do many things without practical experience.
                      12. -2
                        22 November 2023 07: 26
                        Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                        Nope, it won't work. There is no way to do many things without practical experience.

                        Let's wait and see...
      2. +2
        21 November 2023 11: 09
        Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
        there seems to be a problem with the readers.

        Vova, don't be stupid. There can never be too many readers! As well as money! The more the better.
        1. -1
          21 November 2023 11: 23
          Vova, don't be stupid. There can never be too many readers! As well as money! The more the better.


          It looks like you're missing a lot.
          1. +1
            21 November 2023 12: 03
            Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
            Vova, don't be stupid. There can never be too many readers! As well as money! The more the better.


            It looks like you're missing a lot.

            Now is not the time when books were published... just like that. Nowadays publishing houses work only with those authors whose books are sold.
            1. +3
              21 November 2023 12: 31
              Now is not the time when books were published... just like that. Nowadays publishing houses work only with those authors whose books are sold.


              Is that why you advertise so aggressively? lol
              And the time today is such that there is a lot of printed material that one would be disgusted to pick up, let alone read.
              1. -3
                21 November 2023 13: 53
                Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                Is that why you advertise so aggressively?

                Vladimir! Let’s do this: don’t get involved in matters you don’t understand, in particular publishing matters. Where did you see aggressive advertising? This is so-so... "toys are not little stuff." Aggressive advertising is completely different.

                Yesterday, for example, I met with 6th grade schoolchildren in city library No. 2. I told them about my book “The Brilliant Middle Ages” Children. the whole class put on real chain mail and were simply delighted. But...meetings with readers today are stipulated in the contract with the publishing house. This is the writer’s JOB, and whether his books are sold or not is the tenth matter. Although important, of course. And I will also meet with both children and adults. Would you also say aggressive advertising? But the children would never have experienced such joy without me. By the way, 6th grade, and they asked very smart questions. And then all this can turn into another book... So this is kind of work. And it’s written about aggressive advertising in my university textbooks. One was reprinted three times, such was the demand.

                Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                And the time today is such that there is a lot of printed material that one would be disgusted to pick up, let alone read.

                I don’t know, I haven’t seen such books. But this doesn’t apply to mine at all.
                1. +5
                  21 November 2023 15: 08
                  Yesterday, for example, I met with 6th grade schoolchildren in city library No. 2. I told them about my book “The Brilliant Middle Ages” Children. the whole class put on real chain mail and were simply delighted. But...meetings with readers today are stipulated in the contract with the publishing house. This is the writer’s JOB, and whether his books are sold or not is the tenth matter. Although important, of course. And I will also meet with both children and adults. Would you also say aggressive advertising? But the children would never have experienced such joy without me. By the way, 6th grade, and they asked very smart questions. And then all this can turn into another book... So this is kind of work. And it’s written about aggressive advertising in my university textbooks. One was reprinted three times, such was the demand.


                  Oh, for God's sake, date whoever you want. After all, your creativity is quite harmless.
                  To such a level of denigration that the same Miroslav Morozov, Mikhail Timin and other media tactics are like walking to China from the same Penza. laughing
                  1. -1
                    21 November 2023 15: 41
                    Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                    After all, your creativity is quite harmless.

                    As Odessa residents say, I’m laughing hard at you. Although this is a sin.
                    1. 0
                      21 November 2023 16: 38
                      As Odessa residents say, I’m laughing hard at you. Although this is a sin.


                      Only wise men can afford to laugh at themselves. lol
                      1. -3
                        21 November 2023 17: 12
                        Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                        Only wise men can afford to laugh at themselves

                        Judging by your text, you are still far from a sage. It is only suitable for Zen.
                      2. +1
                        21 November 2023 19: 38
                        Judging by your text, you are still far from a sage. It is only suitable for Zen.

                        But I don’t even try. This is where you all prove something.
                        By the way, your behavior fits into the so-called “empty biography” syndrome. This is when a person has more than half of his life behind him, and there is nothing to remember or tell.
                      3. -3
                        22 November 2023 07: 24
                        Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                        By the way, your behavior fits into the so-called “empty biography” syndrome.

                        And yours in a poem: “As soon as I put on a sword belt, I become dumber and dumber!”
                  2. 0
                    21 November 2023 17: 55
                    Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                    Miroslava Morozova

                    And he's a slanderer, right? And how and what does he denigrate?
                    1. 0
                      21 November 2023 19: 39
                      And he's a slanderer, right? And how and what does he denigrate?


                      The history of the USSR, writing fables.
                      1. +1
                        21 November 2023 20: 38
                        Hmmm... Morozov is considered almost the best researcher of the history of the Soviet Navy...
                      2. +2
                        22 November 2023 07: 19
                        Quote: 3x3zsave
                        Morozov is considered almost the best researcher of the history of the Soviet Navy

                        Today. And this one is bad. Now, if he wrote in 1948...
                      3. +2
                        21 November 2023 22: 36
                        The history of the USSR, writing fables.

                        Can I have an example of a tall tale from Miroslav Morozov? Wouldn't it be difficult?
                      4. -1
                        22 November 2023 07: 23
                        Quote: Dekabrist
                        Can I have an example of a tall tale from Miroslav Morozov? Wouldn't it be difficult?

                        "Look, what did you want? Your sister fell into the pool and drowned!" (Baba Yaga to little goat Ivanushka)
                      5. 0
                        22 November 2023 07: 22
                        Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                        The history of the USSR, writing fables.

                        Then, Vladimir, God himself ordered you to find here on the VO cycle of my flocks called the POISONED FEATHER. All on newspapers and archival materials. Very interesting. And what comments there were about me - brilliant. Yours are resting.
                      6. +1
                        22 November 2023 11: 20
                        Then, Vladimir, God himself ordered you to find here on the VO cycle of my flocks called the POISONED FEATHER. All on newspapers and archival materials. Very interesting. And what comments there were about me - brilliant. Yours are resting.

                        I can't cover everything. We (the team) are working on this here:
                        https://www.youtube.com/c/VL4DIMIR42/videos
                      7. -1
                        22 November 2023 12: 51
                        Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                        https://www.youtube.com/c/VL4DIMIR42/videos

                        Thank! I'll see.
                      8. -1
                        22 November 2023 13: 00
                        Looked! Very interesting. Well done on you for being able to get this all going.
                      9. -1
                        22 November 2023 13: 21
                        Now, what is important and what you should pay attention to if you haven’t already. You should rely exclusively on archival sources. Memoirs for beauty and nothing more. "He's lying like an eyewitness." Podolsk Archive of the Republic of Armenia, the former archive of the Komsomol Central Committee in Moscow - there are Komsomol heroes there. The former archive of the CPSU Central Committee - I don’t know where it is now or what it’s called - there is the whole history of the country and the party for 1941-1945. If you get there and start working with their documents, then... you can say whatever you want out loud. It's like a butt that no whip can break. Accordingly. Now you have transmissions. But they must be done in such a way that their scenarios are chapters in a book! I hosted TV programs for 10 years as an author and presenter on Penza TV and wrote THREE books based on them. For 10 years he edited his own magazine and... also wrote several books based on it. You need to plan to work as well. Photos... You must have them all, either yours or someone else’s, but “public domain”, otherwise the publishers will not work with you. That's all, actually. Go for it!
      3. -2
        21 November 2023 11: 27
        Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
        And the machine gun is just a decoration.

        As you can see, Vovochka, there is very little information and it is contradictory. And, of course, finding out how it all happened is interesting and useful for everyone. Perhaps we can work together to figure this out. Instead, you purely childishly prefer to clap your palms and shout: “Akela missed!” This is unworthy of an adult man and reveals that you are a person of low culture. Well, we cannot judge the level of intelligence. Your articles are not on Military Review...
        1. +4
          21 November 2023 12: 33
          As you can see, Vovochka, there is very little information and it is contradictory. And, of course, finding out how it all happened is interesting and useful for everyone. Perhaps we can work together to figure this out. Instead, you purely childishly prefer to clap your palms and shout: “Akela missed!” This is unworthy of an adult man and reveals that you are a person of low culture. Well, we cannot judge the level of intelligence. Your articles are not on Military Review...


          So first you need to find out, and not rush to compose an opus about your childhood.
          1. -2
            21 November 2023 13: 59
            Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
            So first you need to find out, and not rush to compose an opus about your childhood.

            Again you are wrong, Vladimir. What does it mean to take your time? I wrote this material TWO WEEKS AGO. I read three different sources. And moreover, it’s good that people on the site look for materials themselves, read, and discuss. I’ll tell you, so be it, a professional secret of online journalism... and sometimes the authors... deliberately make mistakes or write “the wrong thing” in order to provoke a discussion. I do not do that. I just... don't use more than three sources. And there... how holy God is. Got it - good! Didn't hit it - people will correct it! And that's how it happened. And someone else simply “let off steam.” Here you are, for example, and this is also beneficial to you and society. This is our job.
            1. +4
              21 November 2023 15: 11
              Again you are wrong, Vladimir. What does it mean to take your time? I wrote this material TWO WEEKS AGO. I read three different sources. And moreover, it’s good that people on the site look for materials themselves, read, and discuss. I’ll tell you, so be it, a professional secret of online journalism... and sometimes the authors... deliberately make mistakes or write “the wrong thing” in order to provoke a discussion. I do not do that. I just... don't use more than three sources. And there... how holy God is. Got it - good! Didn't hit it - people will correct it! And that's how it happened. And someone else simply “let off steam.” Here you are, for example, and this is also beneficial to you and society. This is our job.


              That is, the reliability of your articles is below par. I hope it’s clear why I don’t want to publish here.
              1. -6
                21 November 2023 15: 26
                Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                That is, the reliability of your articles is below par. I hope it’s clear why I don’t want to publish here.

                Oh, you didn't understand anything. Apparently, the two wars in which you wrote to me about your participation did not have the best effect on you. It’s sad.
              2. -2
                21 November 2023 16: 00
                Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                I hope it’s clear why I don’t want to publish here.

                Now it’s clear why on Zen... Here... it’s unpleasant to receive minuses, but there... there everything is good.
                1. +1
                  21 November 2023 16: 41
                  Now it’s clear why on Zen... Here... it’s unpleasant to receive minuses, but there... there everything is good.


                  Again you are not in the know. Pros, cons, this is just for the comments. And I haven’t given a damn about them for a long time. They will not add or subtract stars to real shoulder straps.
                  I just don't want to be in the company of local authors. I have this right. Yes
                  1. -4
                    21 November 2023 17: 13
                    Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
                    I just don't want to be in the company of local authors. I have this right

                    In Zen, of course, it’s easier, you noticed that correctly.
                    1. -1
                      21 November 2023 19: 40
                      In Zen, of course, it’s easier, you noticed that correctly.


                      I'm just there on my own.
    2. +3
      21 November 2023 10: 55
      Quote: Dekabrist
      The SIA model 1918 machine gun has a semi-blowback with a slow rotation. His trunk is motionless.

      Dear Victor. You wrote a very interesting thing. As you yourself understand, I didn’t come up with the idea about the barrel. I had an Italian source and it was quite detailed in detail. Christopher Shant writes about this machine gun that it had a slow-opening bolt, but nothing is said about the barrel. And besides, a “delayed bolt” may well coexist with a movable barrel. So here I could neither add nor subtract anything. Apparently you found another source. It will be interesting to compare and contrast them.
      1. +6
        21 November 2023 12: 00
        Quote: kalibr
        And besides, a “delayed bolt” may well coexist with a movable barrel.

        Vyacheslav Olegovich, look at the very first photo of how the machine gun is attached to the machine, in my opinion there can be no talk of any movable barrel
        1. +1
          21 November 2023 12: 07
          Quote: mark1
          about no moving barrel

          Yes, most likely this is true. But still, the links - “I looked and saw” are somehow not enough. I looked at first and... didn’t see it. Focused on the text.
          1. +8
            21 November 2023 12: 34
            But still, the links - “I looked and saw” are somehow not enough.

            Quite enough. Anyone who understands even a little about small arms understands that a machine gun with such a mounting to the machine cannot physically have a movable barrel.



            You can add the same machine gun in a section to completely dispel doubts.

            1. -6
              21 November 2023 12: 40
              Quote: Dekabrist
              But still, the links - “I looked and saw” are somehow not enough.

              Quite enough. Anyone who understands even a little about small arms understands that a machine gun with such a mounting to the machine cannot physically have a movable barrel.



              You can add the same machine gun in a section to completely dispel doubts.


              I didn’t see it in the section. And looking at the photo... you can say ANYTHING. It seems so to you, another will say - there is a slip clutch. And it moves back 10 mm. There's just enough there.
              1. +8
                21 November 2023 15: 13
                And looking at the photo... you can say ANYTHING.

                This is the case if, in the process of obtaining higher education, your main subjects were:
                - history of primitive society;
                - history of ancient civilizations;
                - history of antiquity;
                - history of the Middle Ages;
                - history of modern times.
                - history of modern times.
                In this case, the individual, quite naturally, looks at the book, sees a fig and says whatever he wants.
                But if among your core subjects there are theoretical mechanics and TMM (theory of mechanisms and machines), then the picture turns out to be completely different and the conclusions are appropriate.
                You and I have discussed this topic many times, although Grandfather Krylov wrote that pies should be baked by a pie maker either in the XNUMXth or XNUMXth centuries. Nothing has changed since then, on the contrary.
                1. -1
                  21 November 2023 15: 44
                  Quote: Dekabrist
                  And looking at the photo... you can say ANYTHING.

                  This is the case if, in the process of obtaining higher education, your main subjects were:
                  - history of primitive society;
                  - history of ancient civilizations;
                  - history of antiquity;
                  - history of the Middle Ages;
                  - history of modern times.
                  - history of modern times.
                  In this case, the individual, quite naturally, looks at the book, sees a fig and says whatever he wants.
                  But if among your core subjects there are theoretical mechanics and TMM (theory of mechanisms and machines), then the picture turns out to be completely different and the conclusions are appropriate.
                  You and I have discussed this topic many times, although Grandfather Krylov wrote that pies should be baked by a pie maker either in the XNUMXth or XNUMXth centuries. Nothing has changed since then, on the contrary.

                  A person studies at a university for 5 years and is considered a specialist. I have been studying non-scientific engineering at a university since 1980... How many times have I graduated from it since then? Yes, I didn’t study “machine parts”. But I stare at different equipment so much that... I see enough.
                  1. +7
                    21 November 2023 16: 14
                    I have been studying non-scientific engineering at a university since 1980... How many times have I graduated from it since then?

                    I can say absolutely definitely - not even once.
                    For example, I have been using a personal computer since 1987. At that time, the vast majority of residents of the USSR had no idea about the existence of such technology. But that didn’t make me a programmer.
                    1. -1
                      21 November 2023 16: 54
                      Quote: Dekabrist
                      But that didn’t make me a programmer.

                      Using a tool is one thing. Doing something from different angles, so to speak, is another thing. However, here I already see some kind of painful commitment to this institution of yours. Therefore, I will not prove anything. The result is important, and it is in my favor. Now, with your help, I will correct about the trunk and it will be a chapter in the book. In about a year, no one will even remember that today’s discussion took place, just like the discussion about revolvers. And people will read and rejoice. But I am sincerely grateful to you for your help on the pages of VO. This is different from: “... uses it and doesn’t thank you!”
                    2. 0
                      21 November 2023 18: 49
                      Quote: Dekabrist
                      For example, I have been using a personal computer since 1987.

                      It's funny. Just this year I was studying in graduate school at KuGu, where they decided to teach us humanities students how to work on a PC. We had lectures for a while, then practice - creating programs and completing assignments. The most interesting thing was playing a game - I don’t remember the name - you have land, grain, people and you rule. You are attacked by enemies, rats, hunger. you buy and sell grain, hire soldiers. At first he ruled for a year and I was overthrown... But then... he ruled for 92 years (!). And the computer spit out: You and two surviving residents of your country moved from neighboring Honduras. There was no one even left to overthrow me. Here is my first acquaintance with a PC.
                2. -1
                  21 November 2023 15: 53
                  Quote: Dekabrist
                  vice versa.

                  By the way, the Italian book you found did not open for me. and I’m not at all sure that you managed to read it. Moreover, it is in Italian. You just came across a source where it was written about a stationary barrel. But I don’t... That’s all!
                  1. +5
                    21 November 2023 16: 10
                    By the way, the Italian book you found did not open for me.

                    Nothing surprising. This book is not available online for free. Only for money. Naturally, I didn’t pay 40 euros for a few comments.
                    But thank God there are friends,
                    And thank God my friends have swords.

                    and I’m not at all sure that you managed to read it. Moreover, it is in Italian.

                    Have I ever deceived you?
                    1. -1
                      21 November 2023 16: 57
                      Quote: Dekabrist
                      Have I ever deceived you?

                      No, but in my opinion this is a very difficult and thankless task.
          2. +4
            21 November 2023 14: 10
            Quote: kalibr
            But still, the links - “I looked and saw” are somehow not enough.

            Well, I also didn’t immediately “look and see”, first I looked and saw a fig, the only thing that confused (and delighted) me was the small box, and I only understood it after reading the Decembrist’s post.
            But the coupling with this method of fastening will not work (and it will break)
            1. -1
              21 November 2023 15: 54
              Quote: mark1
              Well, I also didn’t immediately “look and see”, first I looked and saw a fig, the only thing that confused (and delighted) me was the small box, and I only understood it after reading the Decembrist’s post.
              But the coupling with this method of fastening will not work (and it will break)

              !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    3. +1
      21 November 2023 11: 21
      Quote: Dekabrist
      Moreover, as an aviation one.

      Source: https://tvd.im/small-arms/4821-sia-modello-1918.html
      It says here: this weapon had a delayed recoil system, that is, this weapon had a delayed recoil system. But this is a very vague characteristic, isn't it?
    4. 0
      21 November 2023 11: 42
      I found a program similar to “Forgotten weapons” in Italian. https://coincryptonews.com/2021/08/30/mitragliatrice-sia-mod-1938-levoluzione-della-sia-mod-1918/ But I don’t know him, but translate the subscripts into English. failed to translate. Maybe you will have better luck?
    5. +9
      21 November 2023 13: 08
      Decembrist, you see on the plane two famous Italian comedians named Franco and Ciccio, and from the cast of this film I can tell you that these were the best characters in Italian comedy of that time. As for the machine gun described in the article, I, as a citizen of Italy, frankly, did not know about it, but today I had the opportunity to study it.
      1. +4
        21 November 2023 15: 24
        I, as an Italian citizen, to be honest, didn’t know about him

        How could you, being a citizen of Italy, not know about sia-modello-1918?
        1. +5
          21 November 2023 20: 16
          True, I personally know a little more than the average population, but I can assure you that 99,9% of ordinary people in Italy know practically nothing about weapons, and especially about weapons from the First World War. All that ordinary people know about the First World War is that it was fought in the Alps, and then they only know a few names of generals and a few battles.
  6. +5
    21 November 2023 10: 48
    And there it turned out that the person who tore off this machine gun simply could not cope with the Maxim!

    ...
    So it turned out that in the first book the heroes hide exactly “Maxim”, and in the third - for some reason they find SIA


    It is unlikely that such a replacement would have helped the heroes much. The SIA model 1918, in addition to being very unreliable, had some operational features, without knowledge of which the heroes would not have shot off half the magazine. Judging by the fact that you, Vyacheslav Olegovich, did not mention these features, your heroes also did not know about them and after a couple of bursts they were left without a machine gun.
    The SIA model 1918 required lubrication of the cartridges. Moreover, the lubrication is very careful, as they say - “no more, no less.” In the design of SIA Mod.1938, a special dispenser was even adapted to solve this problem; it is visible in the photo on top of the receiver immediately behind the base of the magazine.
    1. 0
      21 November 2023 11: 06
      Quote: Dekabrist
      just behind the base of the store

      It's good that they didn't know. I needed it to jam right away! But I looked on the Internet:
      https://wofmd.com/2023/01/11/legkij-pulemet-korolevstva-italiya-sia-modello-1918/ - здесь материал переводной, но написано, что затвор и вовсе СВОБОДНЫЙ. Посмотрю еще...
      1. +3
        21 November 2023 12: 17
        Source -
        Franco Cabrio, Uomini e mitragliatrici della Grande Guerra, vol. 2, Gino Rossato Editore,
        2009.

        Almost all serious publications “draw” from it.
        Automation scheme - sistema di chiusura labile ritardata (delayed blowback) - literally translated - slow blowback shutter, in Russian-language publications they usually write semi-free. This is if there is a qualified translator who is not lazy to look in a thematic dictionary. In other cases, they translate as much as possible, especially if they use machine translation.
        By the way, your source https://wofmd.com/2023/01/11/legkij-pulemet-korolevstva-italiya-sia-modello-1918/ also says -
        blowback delayed action system
        1. +1
          21 November 2023 12: 44
          [quote=Dekabrist]
          Victor, thank you! You recommended a very valuable source to me.
          1. 0
            21 November 2023 15: 56
            Quote: kalibr
            Very valuable source

            It just doesn’t open... And I couldn’t find it posted on the Internet!
        2. +1
          21 November 2023 12: 46
          Quote: Dekabrist
          In other cases, they translate in different ways, especially if they use machine translation.

          I'll keep it on mind! I've come across this several times already.
          1. +2
            21 November 2023 15: 42
            I've come across this a few times already.

            What is the problem? The personal message on the site is working. Email too. Asking a question and getting advice is a matter of minutes.
            1. -1
              21 November 2023 16: 10
              Quote: Dekabrist
              What is the problem? The personal message on the site is working. Email too. Asking a question and getting advice is a matter of minutes.

              It’s not in my rules to burden people with my problems without being able to repay them in kind. And just lend... Roughly speaking: “You take other people’s money, but give your own.” And so I don’t owe anyone. Except yourself.
              1. +5
                21 November 2023 16: 32
                It’s not in my rules to burden people with my problems without being able to repay them in kind.

                The term “altruism” appeared in the XNUMXth century. It was introduced into science by the philosopher and sociologist Auguste Comte.
                1. -1
                  21 November 2023 16: 59
                  Quote: Dekabrist
                  The term “altruism” appeared in the XNUMXth century. It was introduced into science by the philosopher and sociologist Auguste Comte.

                  I'm in favor myself. But in relation to others. In relation to myself personally... I am always afraid of altruism.
  7. +5
    22 November 2023 00: 58
    Another rewrite from Shpakovsky :(it’s because of such authors that the site is going downhill..
    1. -2
      22 November 2023 07: 17
      Quote: IImonolitII
      IImonolitII

      I'll tell you a secret! Today, 90% of ALL publications in all publications are rewrites. There is very little newness. But I promise you that all of my memoir articles are absolutely not rewritten, everything is taken from my memory. Will this suit you or not? An article on medieval history is also not a rewrite; there is a lot of completely new work there. And only the lazy didn’t write about weapons. But it is given to you on a plate. And you may not know the Italian language, but still learn about CIA. The Italian wrote in the comments that he didn’t know about him, but thanks to me, he found out. And you turn up your nose. Ay-ay, it's a shame. Ugh!
      Quote: IImonolitII
      It's because of authors like these that the site is going downhill.

      And it doesn’t roll down, but rather rises. It is among the same in the TOP FIVE sites in the world!
      1. +1
        23 November 2023 11: 20
        It is among the same in the TOP FIVE sites in the world!

        I would like more details.
        And then he took first place in the “rating”, where Navalny’s site was among fifty “best” sites on military topics
        1. -1
          23 November 2023 18: 39
          Quote: Nefarious skeptic
          I would like more details.

          They will be at the end of the year, when we sum up the results of the year.
  8. -1
    26 November 2023 22: 16
    Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
    And he's a slanderer, right? And how and what does he denigrate?


    The history of the USSR, writing fables.


    A special officer will also come to each artist... Tired and kind, he will give the department the command: kill!
    Without any grades, trials or torture. And without any Stalinist love for mankind, manure will become manure.
  9. 0
    3 March 2024 18: 11
    This machine gun was manufactured before the end of the First World War. This is a 6,5mm heavy machine gun. This machine gun was taken as a model for later Italian machine guns produced in the 20th century (for example, FIAT model 1924, FIAT model 1927). For automation, the designers used the functional stroke of the sleeve with an unlocked and non-braking bolt. The barrel of the machine gun is motionless. An interesting feature is that at the end of the stroke the bolt rotates approximately 40°.
    True, I knew little about this machine, so I’m extremely pleased. I see that a person has to study all his life. Thank you and I also thank my fellow panelists. am