New eyes for US intelligence

34
New eyes for US intelligence

Not very pleasant information, but the Pentagon has officially announced that the next AWACS aircraft of the US Air Force and now, in fact, NATO, will be the Boeing E-7A Wedgetail. The decision comes amid repeated criticism that the current E-3 Sentry airborne warning and control system (AWACS) aircraft is so outdated that it cannot be considered effective.

Actually myself story Boeing E-7 is interesting. The plane is new, made its first flight in 2004. Created on the basis of the Boeing 737, a very reliable and proven aircraft. It flies decently (up to 5 km), speed is like a passenger airliner (000 km/h), altitude up to 850 m.



The armament, so to speak, consists of a multifunctional MESA (Multi-role Electronically Scanned Array) radar. This is not just an antenna, it is a “multi-purpose electronically scanned array”, that is, a number of independently operating arrays in different directions from the Northrop Grumman company " Naturally, the arrays are phased, which removes the cumbersome antenna rotation mechanism from the design.

The entire AFAR structurally consists of three antenna arrays, one of which provides scanning in sectors plus or minus 30 degrees. in the front and rear hemispheres, and the other two - side view on the right and left. In practice, the viewing angle is as close as possible to 360 degrees. The antenna height is 2,4 m, length is 10,7 m. The AFAR has 288 solid-state transceiver modules.

The radar operates in the frequency range 1,2-1,4 GHz, the range with a circular view of space exceeds 400 km. The number of targets detected per scanning cycle reaches 3000.

The station has three operating modes: scanning airspace, scanning surface space and frame shooting for detailed viewing of a given area.


In addition, the aircraft is equipped with a satellite communications station, which makes it possible to transmit information in high-speed mode to any point on the globe where there are appropriate receivers. To ensure reliable classified telephone communications and exchange of data between operators and crew with ground (ship) control and guidance centers, as well as with TA aircraft, Link-4A data transmission system equipment, Link-11 data transmission equipment, communication and distribution equipment are installed on board the aircraft Link-16 data. Well, for general communications, the aircraft is equipped with three HF and eight VHF radio stations.

For protection, there is a complex to counter air-to-air and surface-to-air missiles. The electronic warfare complex includes: the AN/AAQ-24(V) “Nemesis” optoelectronic countermeasures system, an automatic ejection device for dipole reflectors and IR decoys, as well as an ALR-2001 computer for controlling the operation of the complex.

In general, it is a serious machine for performing serious tasks.


The most piquant thing in this story is that the aircraft is already in operation in the air forces of three countries, Australia (6 units), Turkey (4 units) and South Korea (4 units) plus ordered for the British Air Force (5 units) why was stubbornly ignored by the US Air Force. And now, it finally dawned on me that the Sentry is no longer the aircraft that can effectively perform the tasks assigned to such machines.


On the other hand, over 15 years of active operation, all the strengths and weaknesses of the aircraft were clarified. This, of course, is a big plus for the Americans, because in general it is not customary in the world to sell to the outside what is not in service at home. The case of the E-7 is almost unique, because similar attempts to sell aircraft that were not in service with the air force of the country of origin usually failed, as was the case with the Russian MiG-35 at a tender in India.

The US Air Force is purchasing the E-7A to replace its E-3 fleet, at least in part, with the UK doing the same, while Turkey already operates the type, so commonality with NATO forces will continue. For the intelligence forces of the alliance, this is a plus, and a considerable one.

The NATO Support and Procurement Agency (NSPA), which is also responsible for providing the alliance with equipment from various countries, announced its plan to “take steps to acquire” six E-7A aircraft.


The decision to purchase the E-7A was made by NSPA together with the countries that partner and support the E-7 project: Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Romania and the USA.

Jointly, NSPA and Support Partnership Nations concluded that the E-7A "is the only known system currently capable of meeting Strategic Command's core operational requirements and key performance parameters and available for delivery on time." Thus, the mechanism for replacing E-3 with E-7A was launched.

A quick and instant replacement will not work. Such complex machines are not produced like fighter jets, and therefore orders for the UK and the USA will take more than one year. In general, it is planned to reach operational saturation with E-7A aircraft by 2031, and completely withdraw the E-3 from use by 2035.

According to NSPA, among the reasons why the E-7A Wedgetail was considered the best candidate were "the benefits of economies of scale, commonality, and interoperability stemming from the multinational acquisition of military off-the-shelf platforms." This degree of commonality and the prospect of interoperability with other E-7 fleets clearly gave Boeing's product an advantage over the only other realistic candidate, the Saab "Global Eye", which is based on the Bombardier Global 6000/6500 long-range business jet airframe.


Everything is also interesting with the Swedish development. Despite the fact that SAAB is a Swedish concern, the Swedish Air Force was in no hurry to purchase an aircraft for its needs. The first operators of the Global Eye were the United Arab Emirates, and in Sweden itself discussions about the Saab Global Eye production are just underway, while the Scandinavian country has not yet officially joined the NATO alliance.

Regarding the selection of the E-7A for the alliance, Stacey Cummings, NSPA CEO, commented:
“This work marks an important milestone in NATO's ongoing efforts to improve its readiness and capabilities in the years ahead. NSPA's technology acquisition strategy is designed to provide a range of benefits that will strengthen the alliance's ability to respond to evolving security challenges."


NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg added:
“Surveillance and reconnaissance aircraft are critical to NATO's collective defense and I welcome Allies' commitment to investing in high-tech capabilities. By pooling resources, allies can collectively purchase and exploit large assets that would be too expensive for individual countries. These investments in cutting-edge technologies demonstrate the strength of transatlantic defense cooperation as we continue to adapt to a more volatile world.”


Given that NATO intends to order just six E-7A aircraft under the iAFSC project, it appears that there is a strong likelihood that further orders for the Wedgetail will be placed as part of the broader AFSC initiative. After all, the NATO Air Warning and Control Force (NAEW&CF), based at Geilenkirchen Air Base in Germany, currently operates 16 E-3A aircraft. It is clear that instead of them, 6 E-7A aircraft look more than modest.


On the other hand, the description of AFSC as a "system of systems" indicates a desire for the E-7A fleet, regardless of its eventual size, to operate as part of an integrated sensor network that will also include unmanned aerial vehicles, other types of aircraft that can work as surveillance assets as well as space-based systems.

NATO plans include the use of the long-endurance RQ-7D Phoenix high-altitude unmanned aerial vehicle, space reconnaissance, maritime reconnaissance, ground-based long-range surveillance radars and MILSATCOM (Military Satellite Communications Command) in conjunction with the E-4A.

Considering that in the recent past the USAF saw the E-7 as a solution to bridge the gap between the retirement of the E-3 and the future capabilities of space-based radar and other advanced systems, then the intelligence-gathering plan is quite workable, at least in his original theory.

Radar in space is, of course, powerful. Back in 2021, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Charles Q. Brown said the E-7 purchase "gives us a path" to new space-based radar capabilities, which he said could be less vulnerable than a system based on a commercial airliner. It’s hard to argue with the general; a radar platform in space is much less vulnerable than an aircraft in the atmosphere, however, not 100%. But building it, launching it and debugging it is much more difficult (and more expensive!) than 5-6 aircraft capable of performing the same tasks.

But space tracking systems are a completely separate matter; they have both advantages and disadvantages over surveillance systems on aircraft. But today's battlefield in terms of spending money on construction is still with airplanes.

Interestingly, while NATO has so far said nothing about buying more than the first six E-7As, let alone adding another type of aircraft, there may still be hope for adding Saab in a European AEW&C context.


At this week's Dubai Airshow, it was revealed that Denmark, Finland and Sweden are in talks with Saab to potentially jointly operate the Global Eye. This initiative will likely include the two Global Eyes that Sweden has ordered, with deliveries due in 2027. Sweden has an option for two more of these aircraft. Four aircraft are quite capable of performing any tasks for three countries.


A pair of Saab "Global Eye" aircraft over Sweden

"We are in talks with neighboring countries in Scandinavia - Finland and Denmark - to see if expansion from two or more aircraft in the region could be a solution."
, said Thomas Lundin, head of marketing and sales AEW&C at Saab.

In general, there are already precedents for such joint cooperation, including the launch earlier this year of the Northern Combat Concept for joint air operations. In principle, it is not so important which brands of aircraft will be used if they operate using the same data transmission and exchange protocols.

In addition to Global Eye, Saab already has experience in AEW&C with NATO operators in Europe. Greece operates the earlier Erieye system installed on EMB-145H regional jets, and Poland recently received the first of its two Saab 340 turboprops equipped with Erieye. Sweden, which is currently awaiting NATO membership, also operates the Saab 340 along with the Erieye under the local designation S100B Argus.


Swedish Air Force S100B Argus aircraft

In Europe, interest in AEW&C is being spurred by events in Ukraine, as well as other operational emergencies requiring large-scale airspace surveillance and control. The E-7 already plays an important role in these missions, not only with Turkey, but also in the case of the aircraft that Australia has deployed to Europe. The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) has used its Wedgetail to monitor military and humanitarian supplies entering Ukraine, and the aircraft's performance in that theater may have also helped NATO decide to purchase the E-7A.

Overall, the specific requirements of the European area of ​​operations make an AEW&C asset such as the E-7A "Wedgetail" highly valuable, given NATO's proximity to Russia and the need to monitor the movements of Russian military aircraft as well as Russian drones and rockets. According to American experts, the need for daily surveillance of airspace in Europe has existed since the Cold War and has recently become increasingly urgent.

With Saab hoping that Global Eye can find new customers in Europe and further integration into NATO, and the US Air Force following the UK in announcing plans to acquire the E-7A, it is fair to say that AEW&C is experiencing something of a renaissance in NATO as a whole.
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    20 November 2023 04: 52
    Black envy!
    one of which provides scanning in sectors plus or minus 30 degrees. in the front and rear hemispheres,

    Okay, forward, how about back?
    1. 0
      20 November 2023 06: 18
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      Okay, forward, how about back?

    2. -9
      20 November 2023 06: 40
      Our alternative to cheap UAVs... group multi-level systems...
      1. +3
        24 November 2023 07: 33
        Quote: Civil
        Our alternative is cheap UAVs.

        For AWACS?
        Cheap UAVs?
        Did you even understand the topic of the article? AWACS aircraft are used for LONG-RANGE radar detection of air targets and control of their aircraft.
        The author did not reveal the reasons why the same USA does not abandon its old AWACS for so long - this is an all-round view (360 degrees), which the board on the back cannot provide in any way. But the “board” has another advantage - such an antenna is capable of determining not only azimuth and range, but also altitude with sufficient accuracy for guidance. What a surveillance radar in a “dish” cannot provide, or it will be with very low accuracy.
        Hence our dilemma with determining the type of antenna for an AWACS aircraft based on the Tu-214. It is for him that a “board” on the back or on the sides is more preferable. Moreover, there is experience in placing two panels on each side (four panels in total) with some additional rotation of the front panel forward and the rear panel back, which ensures an “almost all-round” view of the four panels in total. And this scheme is perhaps preferable in our case. About the same as on the Tu-214R.
        It’s just that we need such AWACS aircraft yesterday, but they still aren’t there.
    3. +1
      21 November 2023 16: 31
      Well, yes, as I understand it, there are a number of transceiver elements in the front and back in the “blap.” There is also a question about the “behind”. But even if there is, here from my sofa it can be seen that the aperture there is relatively small, the number of elements is small and, accordingly, the overall energy in these directions is much worse than in the “side”. Moreover, it is possible to synthesize the aperture with longitudinal movement of the antenna much more efficiently. Those. This device most likely meets the stated characteristics for maximum range only in the case of a side view at an angle of 90 degrees. At all other angles, the aperture of a flat APAA will be a function of sine, with a corresponding decrease in efficiency
  2. +8
    20 November 2023 05: 00
    The number of targets detected per scanning cycle reaches 3000.

    Wow, that means almost everyone will see and hear
    1. +9
      20 November 2023 14: 16
      Here you have decaying capitalism......there are simply no censorship words left...
      1. -3
        20 November 2023 16: 18
        In the field of aviation and radars, Russia and the USSR have always lagged behind. Starting with Imperial Russia. So, you need to strain and catch up. And we have scientists.
  3. +10
    20 November 2023 05: 19
    Eh... They loaded us and our fellow Chinese with avax to the fullest :)

    Colleagues who understand this topic, please tell me what difficulties we face in this area? What prevents us from building a sufficient number of AWACS? Is it really SO much more expensive than the Su-34/35/57 that we can’t rivet at least five new aircraft for the whole country to strengthen the old A-50?
    1. +26
      20 November 2023 05: 56
      The most important thing that interferes is the system of the military-industrial complex, rotten through and through, as a purely commercial project, the management of enterprises by people who put personal profit and process optimization at the forefront. Unfortunately, in drlo we fell behind exactly the same amount as AvtoVAZ lagged behind Toyota (figuratively) i.e. forever, judging by the trends. Those units of aircraft that can now perform at least some tasks do not solve the problem; dozens and dozens of such aircraft are needed. Reconnaissance and control aircraft, anti-submarine aircraft are also needed. But they do not exist, and in the coming decades they will not appear in the required quantities. We need to build new aircraft factories. But the money goes to villas, yachts and mistresses
      1. +1
        20 November 2023 06: 07
        Since we are so far behind, then, as stated in the article, there is no point in jumping into airplanes; Westerners have always had a thing about airplanes, there is no point in catching up. We need to launch it straight into space - to satellites, I think we can handle this faster
      2. +1
        20 November 2023 08: 54
        Quote from: FoBoss_VM
        The most important thing that interferes is the system of the military-industrial complex, rotten through and through, as a purely commercial project, the management of enterprises by people who put personal profit and process optimization at the forefront. Unfortunately, in drlo we fell behind exactly the same amount as AvtoVAZ lagged behind Toyota (figuratively) i.e. forever, judging by the trends. Those units of aircraft that can now perform at least some tasks do not solve the problem; dozens and dozens of such aircraft are needed. Reconnaissance and control aircraft, anti-submarine aircraft are also needed. But they do not exist, and in the coming decades they will not appear in the required quantities. We need to build new aircraft factories. But the money goes to villas, yachts and mistresses

        What is a “commercial project”? Almost the entire military-industrial complex belongs to the state corporation Rostec, controlled by government officials. So commerce has nothing to do with it.
        1. +12
          20 November 2023 11: 08
          I work at a military-industrial complex plant. I don’t need to tell you what belongs to whom, I know this whole kitchen perfectly well from the inside. And yes, download financial reporting documents from the Rostec website and analyze them if you have the knowledge
        2. +10
          20 November 2023 11: 29
          What is a “commercial project”? Almost the entire military-industrial complex belongs to the state corporation Rostec, controlled by government officials. So commerce has nothing to do with it.


          Escariot. Let me disagree with you.

          In a state in which the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie reigns, state property is controlled by bourgeois officials. Any STATE projects are business for them, these are commercial projects for them. The social sphere is a complete loss for them. The production and sale of weapons is one of the best commercial projects. The military-industrial complex does not transfer weapons to the Russian Defense Ministry for free. The state allocates money from the budget. And a lot of money. The head of Rostec and the Minister of Industry and Trade will not let you lie.

          Rostec CEO Sergei Chemezov earned 2021 million rubles in 632,2, as follows from the declaration published on the state corporation’s website... https://www.rbc.ru/business/21/05/2022/6287fae69a794782019a52f2

          The list of the richest officials of the Russian government for the third year in a row is headed by the head of the Ministry of Industry and Trade Denis Manturov. Its income at the end of 2021 amounted to 704,664 million rubles.
          In second place is Deputy Prime Minister Yuri Trutnev with 392,6 million rubles, and compared to 2020, his income increased more than nine times (from 42,3 million). ...https://ria.ru/20220415/dokhody-1783783750.html


          The published Declarations are for 2021.
          The SVO hasn't started yet.

          I think you can guess why from March 1, 2023. declarations of government officials were no longer put on public display.

          PS
          Dividing the pie: Oligarchs, clans and factions are again locked in battle on the internal front.
          ...An example of the struggle for budget money is the program for the development of unmanned aircraft. First, one of the actors asked for 50 billion, and naturally, his competitors rushed in. After this, the president decided that everyone would participate together, but the amount increased to 500 billion. And recently it was announced that 1 trillion budget rubles would be allocated for these purposes. Drones are needed today, but there are not enough of them, and they are already fighting for money until 2030. And so everywhere...
          https://svpressa.ru/economy/article/386978/
          1. -2
            20 November 2023 14: 17
            >> The production and sale of weapons is one of the best commercial projects.
            The best for a conditional Boeing or LM, but for the rest it is not so. Just look at the financial condition of the UAC or USC.
    2. +15
      20 November 2023 11: 38
      I’ll also add that if we are far behind in aviation (there are few factories, specialists and engineers. And the technologies are outdated), then in microelectronics there is not even a lag. Because microelectronics itself does not exist at all. The few enterprises that are engaged in it are tailored to narrow tasks from the field of military-industrial complex for military satellites or systems for the Strategic Missile Forces. But they simply cannot produce a wide range of microelectronics for various purposes for other purposes and industries.
      It's like coming to a lonely blacksmith with an old forge and asking him to assemble a series of cars with internal combustion engines.
      In the USSR, microelectronics lagged behind Western ones because we started later. But still she was there. Our planes, missiles and equipment in general were driven and controlled by our computers using our software built at our enterprises.
      But that's a thing of the past
      1. +2
        20 November 2023 14: 14
        >>In the USSR, microelectronics lagged behind Western ones because we started later. But still she was there.
        That's for sure, 10 years of lag (14 nm) even now would be a blessing for us.
    3. 0
      20 November 2023 14: 13
      It seems that we have problems with the production of modern APM and, more critically, electronics for processing (equipment and computers that are installed in large numbers in AWACS).
    4. +3
      21 November 2023 11: 18
      First of all, there are no platforms. Il-76 is produced at a rate of 3 (THREE!) aircraft per year. One of whom is necessarily a transport worker (of which there is a shortage), and another one is a tanker (of which there is also a shortage).
      Other platforms are not being produced at all - the IL-114 is still waiting for serial TV7-117 engines, the Altius-RU drone is a replacement for German diesel engines. So there’s nothing stupid to make AWACS out of.
      Secondly, there is a problem with the electronics, or more precisely with the element base. She didn’t exist, and she still doesn’t.
      And as long as respected Vladimir Vladimirovich sits in the Kremlin, and enterprises are run by effective managers, we will not see any silver lining.
  4. -12
    20 November 2023 05: 23
    In general, our electronic warfare has a lot to strive for. Goals have been set, tasks have been set for work, comrades
  5. +6
    20 November 2023 07: 42
    Roman, thanks for the article.
    Exhaustively.
  6. +6
    20 November 2023 12: 40
    We congratulate our overseas partners and look forward to a similar solution from industry. Hey! Where the hell is an AWACS with an AFAR comb based on the Tu-214?
    1. +6
      20 November 2023 12: 52
      There are no analogues, everything is digital
  7. -1
    20 November 2023 15: 53
    With Saab hoping that Global Eye can find new customers in Europe and further integration into NATO, and the US Air Force following the UK in announcing plans to acquire the E-7A, it is fair to say that AEW&C is experiencing something of a renaissance in NATO as a whole.

    Well, what can I say, not something good for the Russian Federation! I hope they will make the Russian military-industrial complex modern and even get ahead of the West, where the Russian Federation is very behind!
  8. fiv
    +1
    20 November 2023 16: 19
    The electronic warfare system probably includes more than what is indicated in the article? With such a powerful radar and computer complex, it is possible to jam a large theater area and not only for air defense purposes.
  9. +9
    20 November 2023 18: 48
    But we have parquet on Frunzenskaya from the most expensive types of wood. Americans don’t have this anyway. We have nothing to envy))
  10. +1
    20 November 2023 20: 25
    Quote: Alexey Lantukh
    In the field of aviation and radars, Russia and the USSR have always lagged behind. Starting with Imperial Russia. So, you need to strain and catch up. And we have scientists.


    I wonder what kind of radars they had in Imperial Russia?)
    1. +1
      21 November 2023 02: 35
      Radio! Yeoksil moksil!!! laughing lol
      PS Just kidding of course)
    2. 0
      21 November 2023 15: 13
      So they also write about the field of aviation. Alas, “Ilya Muromets” did not greatly influence the course of WWII
  11. +2
    20 November 2023 20: 53
    During my youth, 8-12 E3s took off from Geilenkirchen a day, which flew along the borders of the Warsaw Pact countries from morning to evening. On Saturday and Sunday they did not fly at all so that the crews could enjoy good German beer and Fräulein
  12. +1
    20 November 2023 20: 57
    All talk about the Russian A100 died down around 2017. Apparently, the entire budget was spent in full.
    To a certain extent, it is easier to arrange state tests for AWACS than, say, for a fighter. You place 400 different targets somewhere in Astrakhan (or Siberia) (moving and stationary, flying and not so much), and see how many of them he detects
  13. -1
    20 November 2023 21: 07
    Eyes can be damaged with LASER.
  14. 0
    20 November 2023 21: 20
    Russian engineer on the capabilities of missiles in service with the Armed Forces of Ukraine, - Interview with ForPost
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. 0
    25 December 2023 08: 24
    The lag is so colossal that there is no point in catching up, because it is completely useless.
    We read it, sighed... and moved on.