Assault M1150 ABV arrived in Ukraine: more about these multi-ton heavyweights

57
Assault M1150 ABV arrived in Ukraine: more about these multi-ton heavyweights

The fact that Ukraine received M1150 ABV assault vehicles from the Americans news cannot be called - unless bearded, since this became known in early November. Therefore, the fact of the transfer itself is pointless to discuss, but we need to talk about what these heavyweights are, who may soon take part in battles. Moreover, they do not at all live up to the title of a simple, cudgel-like minesweeper.

First of all, it should be noted that, despite the designation “assault vehicle” or “assault breakthrough vehicle” (ABV – Assault Breacher Vehicle) being incomprehensible to Russian-speaking readers, the M1150 is essentially an armored mine clearing vehicle. It is intended for making passages in minefields and various kinds of obstacles of man-made and non-man-made origin. Including under enemy fire.



M1150 is a relatively new product if we consider its age from the point of view of engineering technology. Its development started at the beginning of the 1150s at the request of the US Marine Corps. The first six prototypes of the M2002 were manufactured between 2006 and 2008, and already in XNUMX, after final tests, the vehicle was put into service. She managed to fight in Afghanistan, served in South Korea, and now came to Ukraine.


Like its failed predecessors, the M1150 is based on the M1 Abrams. For this Tanks were removed from storage, underwent major repairs and were sent for modification, or rather, for disassembly: from the tank, the manufacturers of this vehicle required only a chassis with a hull without a turret.

No radical changes were made to these parts, so the M1150 is unified with the Abrams in most of the main components and assemblies, as well as spare parts. It has the same 1-horsepower gas turbine engine with automatic transmission, allowing it to accelerate to 500–60 kilometers per hour and overcome uneven terrain with relative ease. And the hull armor has remained the same and in the forehead reaches 65–500 mm from sub-caliber shells and up to 600 mm from cumulative shells, according to various estimates.

But instead of the original turret, a massive, large-sized superstructure was installed on the tank’s chassis, which in weight turned out to be not much less than what was originally installed, based on which the total weight of the fully equipped M1150 is about 58 metric tons (65 “short”). The superstructure has mobility and can be rotated 90 degrees to the right and left, and is also divided into two compartments: front and rear.

Vehicle commander behind a 12.7 mm machine gun mount
Vehicle commander behind a 12,7 mm machine gun mount

The front compartment, reminiscent in outline of the frontal part of the Abras turret, is fully armored and equipped with dynamic protection. In the middle there is a workplace for the vehicle commander with controls for mine action equipment, electronics and communications. The only thing on the roof weapon M1150 in the form of a machine gun mount with a 12,7 mm Browning, as well as elements of an integrated technical vision system.

This system is a set of television cameras installed in the aft and frontal parts of the superstructure. With their help, the commander, without leaning out of the hatch, can fully control the mine clearance process, including monitoring the depth of penetration of knife trawls into the ground, and the removal of mines torn from it from the track. The system also includes a commander’s observation device, consisting of a moving unit of television and infrared cameras with a laser rangefinder for monitoring the terrain at any time of the day and more accurate “aiming” during remote mine clearance.

Elements of an integrated technical vision system. Launchers for concealed aerosol grenades are visible behind
Elements of an integrated technical vision system. Launchers for concealed aerosol grenades are visible behind

By the way, about the remote mine clearance complex. It is located in the rear compartment of the superstructure and is represented by two launchers for M58A3 MICLIC charges, which transform from traveling to combat state (and vice versa) using hydraulics.

Its operating principle is simple. The launchers contain MK22 Mod 4 rockets with charges attached to them, which are 107-meter fabric “sleeves”, equipped with a detonation cable and filled with explosives - 2,2 kilograms of explosives for every 30 centimeters of length (a total of about 790 kg per one charge).

Launching a demining charge
Launching a demining charge

Taking off from the launcher, the projectile pulls a multi-meter charge along its entire length and is disconnected from it at the final stage of the flight. Then the charge that has fallen to the ground is straightened with the help of a brake cable and a command is given to detonate it.

Its detonation leads to the destruction (explosion) of the most common anti-tank and anti-personnel pressure mines, and the dimensions of the cleared area are approximately 100 meters in length and about 8 meters in width. So, taking into account the M1150’s ammunition load of two M58A3s, the total length of passage through the minefield can be 200 meters.


Launching an M58A3 demining charge from an M1150

However, this method of mine clearance does not bring 1150% results - some mines remain lying there, waiting for their target. Especially when it comes to explosive devices with a detonator mechanism different from the push mechanism. And it is unlikely that the MXNUMX would have made a full-fledged minesweeper if it had not been equipped with other mine action equipment. And he has it.

When converting Abrams into M1150, a so-called High Lift Adapter (HLA) or in Russian - “high lift adapter” is installed on their frontal part of the hull. Operated by a driver, it is a hydraulic mechanism that provides for the quick installation of trawls and other “body kit” with the ability to quickly reset them in an emergency without leaving the car.

"High lift adapter" for M1150
"High lift adapter" on M1150

First of all, it is intended for installing a knife mine trawl, consisting of three sections - two side and one central with nine and five knives, respectively. By the way, it was because of him that the M1150 received the nickname Shredder, which translated means “shredder” or “shredder.”

Knife mine trawl on M1150
Knife mine trawl on M1150

By cutting into the top layer of the earth, the knives literally plow up the soil and pull out buried mines from it, throwing them away from the track. The same thing happens with explosive devices lying on the surface - they are thrown aside in the same way. And the level of depth of the knives (constant depth 36 cm) is adjusted using three skids on which the trawl rests with the help of racks similar to spider legs.

Also, instead of a trawl, the “adapter” provides for the installation of an ordinary bulldozer blade. In this case, the functionality of the M1150 expands to making passages in rubble and various kinds of obstacles, or, conversely, creating them, digging positions for firing points and digging anti-tank ditches, etc. In general, everything that a minesweeper cannot do, but a bulldozer can do.

M1150 with a bulldozer blade (closer to the camera) and a knife trawl (farther)
M1150 with a bulldozer blade (closer to the camera) and a knife trawl (farther)

Well, to mark the passages that the M1150 made with either a trawl or a blade, the Lane Marking System is used, or in Russian - a lane/passage/path marking system. It consists of two pneumatic devices installed on the sides of the vehicle in the rear part of the hull.

Each of them contains 50 signal flags (can be replaced with LED or reflective indicators), which, when the vehicle moves, are shot into the ground at regular intervals, thereby marking a safe path for units. However, with the same success they stick even into asphalt and concrete, which is facilitated by powerful pneumatics and metal tips.

Pneumatic installation for marking a safe path
Pneumatic installation for marking a safe path

Overall, of course, the car is quite interesting. The Americans themselves called it the best they have in terms of front-line mine countermeasures. This is understandable: the M1150 has armor, and it’s also supplemented with dynamic protection; there is a full set of equipment to counter most mines, with the exception of any exotic ones; everything is in order with the surveillance equipment - after all, these are not blind-sighted moles, which many BIS are, especially of the Soviet type.

In this regard, it becomes clear why the United States sent this gift to Ukraine. Kyiv, of course, can dispose of it in any way, but, most likely, the purpose of the arrival of the M1150 is to complement the delivered Abrams tanks. Overseas they are well aware that Russian minefields have become one of the most significant threats to armored vehicles, and they do not wish the fate of the Leopard-2s with their “broken legs” to their tanks.

Now all that remains is to see where and when the M1150s show up at the front. But, given the experience of the “counter-offensive”, there are some doubts that their fate will be prosperous - an abundance of anti-tank missiles, aviation and artillery can ruin even the best equipment.

In general, as they say, we’ll see.
57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    16 November 2023 05: 16
    Well, now it’s all woven... or rather, theirs wassat We just set the mines and forgot. Lancets scratch their wings good
    1. +2
      16 November 2023 06: 37
      It’s an interesting thing, but our minefields are many kilometers long, everything is shot through and reinforced by aircraft. There will be little sense. How long will it take to recharge? In the meantime, it goes to reload, the passage is perfectly mined remotely.
      1. 0
        26 January 2024 13: 48
        The car is most useful! The NWO will someday end, and the minefields will need to be cleared, after all, the most fertile black earth region.
    2. -1
      16 November 2023 11: 43
      Well, now it’s all rags... or rather, their wassat. We just laid mines and forgot. Lancets scratch their wings


      Where do you even get such chesuns from? So you can really believe in Olgino.
      Curb your optimism. Lancets are far from wunderwaffe. Moreover, our ancient S-60s are already being removed from storage.
      1. +5
        16 November 2023 19: 31
        Without being sarcastic, but with optimism. When going to the LBS, this remedy cannot work individually. In anticipation of the breakthrough of the minefields, offensive units are formed. They go in a column. Covering. The Wunderwaffe crawls along completely alone. There is nothing written about protecting the upper projection. It’s also not worth overestimating a new toy.
        1. +3
          16 November 2023 23: 30
          Without being sarcastic, but with optimism. When going to the LBS, this remedy cannot work individually.


          And who said that they are used individually?
      2. 0
        22 November 2023 23: 51
        I completely agree, rainbow ponies piss in many people’s eyes
  2. +12
    16 November 2023 05: 20
    By the way, we have no analogues, the BMR-3 is not equipped with a remote mine clearance installation, and the UR-77 is weakly armored, to put it mildly, and cannot use other means of mine clearance

    Then the charge that has fallen to the ground is straightened with the help of a brake cable and a command is given to detonate it.

    That is, this method, if the charge was not straightened, made it possible to partially compensate for the refusal of the 165 mm L9A1 gun. The charge, of course, sharply lost its range of use (more than ten times) but became 40 times more powerful! once.
    1. +3
      16 November 2023 06: 07
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      By the way, we have no analogues, the BMR-3 is not equipped with a remote mine clearance installation, and the UR-77 is lightly armored

      By the way, to achieve superiority by using analogues (especially those with unconfirmed performance characteristics) a larger number of them is required.
      As for the BMR-3m:
      1. +2
        16 November 2023 06: 19
        Quote: ROSS 42
        By the way, to achieve superiority by using analogues (especially those with unconfirmed performance characteristics) a larger number of them is required.

        In direct confrontation. I can’t imagine a confrontation between mine clearance vehicles.))) Well, the Amers have produced about 240 vehicles, I don’t know how many we have. And we are talking specifically about the technical characteristics, and not about what the hikhlov have.

        Quote: ROSS 42
        As for the BMR-3m:
        Roller trawl in the photo, what's wrong?
        1. +23
          16 November 2023 09: 57
          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          Roller trawl in the photo, what's wrong?

          Yes, after a couple of TMs it blows him to hell. We swam, we know... the Chechens built up so many mines after the Komsomol that in the end the engineering companies removed them manually. I had to defuse the witch 1 and rgo with an electric fuse a couple of times... I almost saw it in a coffin... and they do this every day. What kind of endurance is needed... to know so many nuances.... my job is to get corrections from the spotter, azimuth, range orientation on the ground and fire a shot.... and they walk under the threat of death every minute. I will shake the hand of any sapper or engineer and get down on my knees - for guardian angels are like Rooks and our Flyers good soldier
    2. +12
      16 November 2023 10: 13
      -By the way, we have no analogues,
      But in every design bureau (and not only) there’s an “effective” manager wherever you spit. And if you’re not a manager, you want to spit.
      We live thanks to Soviet developments. But they are not limitless.
    3. +1
      16 November 2023 15: 28
      if you use the UR-77 and BMR-3 in tandem, you will get the same functionality as the M1150.
  3. +1
    16 November 2023 05: 22
    Pepelats is there, find a kamikaze crew for him and go ahead, singing.
  4. +7
    16 November 2023 05: 31
    Good technique. Well thought out though. We don’t have anything similar in terms of security, functionality and visibility.
    1. 0
      16 November 2023 06: 49
      Well, why spend so much money if you have raguli - an excellent consumable. And it doesn’t require any investment, other than a piece of lard and a glass of vodka.
    2. +1
      16 November 2023 11: 12
      This is not necessary. The outskirts lamented that the universal was dying and they were left without everything at once. So the flies are separate, the cutlets are separate.
  5. +6
    16 November 2023 05: 49
    Lancet it, lancet
  6. +5
    16 November 2023 06: 03
    It would be a good idea to organize the capture of this machine for subsequent study of all the intricacies of its architecture.
    I hope an antidote will be found against her.
    1. +7
      16 November 2023 06: 11
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      I hope an antidote will be found against her.

      It is not a weapon - it is an engineering machine. But our specialists can and should delve into the insides.
      Judging by the knives, which go 36 cm deep, such an opportunity may present itself very soon...
      Yes
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. 0
      16 November 2023 17: 03
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      It would be a good idea to organize the capture of this machine for subsequent study of all the intricacies of its architecture.
      I hope an antidote will be found against her.

      The problem of capture is the same as with leopards thrown into a field - you can reach them with a pawn, but dragging them through our own minefields is not realistic
  7. fiv
    -2
    16 November 2023 06: 24
    They slipped her an iron crowbar. "COCK!" - said the drink.
    “Yeah,...!!!” - the stern Siberian lumberjacks said reproachfully
  8. +1
    16 November 2023 06: 26
    Quote from Turbuta Dave
    Lancet it, lancet

    Please don't be like the hoch lamas with their "light jewels"
    1. +2
      16 November 2023 06: 29
      Quote: Vladimir80
      Quote from Turbuta Dave
      Lancet it, lancet

      Please don't be like the hoch lamas with their "light jewels"

      Well, unlike “Jevelin”, Lancet is so far justifying itself. It's good to whine, "Vova" negative
      1. +1
        17 November 2023 11: 52
        Quote: Repellent
        Quote: Vladimir80
        Quote from Turbuta Dave
        Lancet it, lancet

        Please don't be like the hoch lamas with their "light jewels"

        Well, unlike “Jevelin”, Lancet is so far justifying itself. It's good to whine, "Vova" negative

        and the cornet hasn’t gone anywhere, it’ll open this jar for mom, don’t worry
  9. +9
    16 November 2023 06: 56
    The technology is interesting, the Yankees know how to make, equip and re-equip various “miracles”. Many people have written about bridges, ports and railway tracks, electric traction substations without me. In the conditions of open spaces, black soil and a decent weight of this device, it would be logical advanced units should be equipped with relatively cheap fvp drones with analogues of the “Molotov cocktail” on the belly. 3-5 pieces of drones, even in the face of opposition from electronic warfare opponents, I think they will be able to fry the imported “Gorynych snake” with spider legs. “It’s pointless to throw caps in the air, but to prepare necessary for the meeting.
  10. +1
    16 November 2023 07: 57
    Am I mistaken or did someone talk about legitimate purposes in the form of equipment supplied abroad?
  11. +2
    16 November 2023 09: 33
    Quote: Lech from Android.
    It would be a good idea to organize the capture of this machine for subsequent study of all the intricacies of its architecture.
    I hope an antidote will be found against it.


    Yes, the antidote is unnecessary - it is necessary to familiarize yourself with the new design: we will have a lot of work ahead on clearing mines/removing explosive objects, which means we will need similar equipment
  12. 0
    16 November 2023 09: 45
    The technology is serious, but it’s not a “wunderwaffle” and it won’t be a “panacea” for minefields if our “engineers” don’t click what ... "stapler"! For every cunning American “nut” there is, if desired (!), a harsh and uncompromising Russian “bolt”! (I won’t even list those “measures” that are advisable to take against the M1150! They are known and “techies” should know about them, or can easily figure it out themselves!)
    1. +5
      16 November 2023 09: 58
      Yes, against the argument of 152 mm, no pepelats can resist, and this is offhand, there are enough such/similar arguments for any pepelats!
    2. -2
      16 November 2023 12: 03
      The technology is serious, but it will not be a “prodigy” and will not be a “panacea” for minefields if our “engineers” do not click what ... with a stapler! For every cunning American “nut” there is, if desired (!), a harsh and uncompromising Russian “bolt”! (I won’t even list those “measures” that are advisable to take against the M1150! They are known and “techies” should know about them, or can easily figure it out themselves!)


      What does an “engineer” have to do with it if managers and banks decide everything? And if you can’t make good money by producing some type of weapon, then they don’t care about its effectiveness.
      And if the “respected partners” from the West promise something again, then a “step of good will” will immediately follow.
      1. +3
        16 November 2023 16: 21
        In this case, you simply pulled the banks and “managers” by the ears. And regarding the “fantastic income” - the heavy military is working at a minimum profit. So there is also a mistake here.
        1. 0
          16 November 2023 21: 21
          Quote: Sergeantpro
          heavy military personnel work at a minimum profit. So there is also a mistake here.

          At any military plant, the management, starting with the heads of workshops, gets paid well. A worker can receive 40 thousand. And the head of a workshop is 150. I am silent about the Director and his deputies. Here recently Putin was puzzled by the small salary in Roscosmos...
  13. +3
    16 November 2023 14: 17
    A hefty barn with one and a half tons of explosives inside, armored only at the front. Glowing in the greenhouse like a Christmas tree.
    A heavy bandura is suitable only in summer and in dry areas...
  14. -1
    16 November 2023 16: 39
    Quote: hammerite
    A hefty barn with one and a half tons of explosives inside, armored only at the front. Glowing in the greenhouse like a Christmas tree.
    A heavy bandura is suitable only in summer and in dry areas...

    Bravo! Will you show us how to fight them when they are covered by other armor? Or are you just capable of grinding nonsense from a warm, dry apartment?
    1. +1
      17 November 2023 11: 56
      Quote: Letterhead
      Will you show us how to fight them when they are covered by other armor?

      where does it cover? 152mm, cornet, lancet in the stern
  15. +2
    16 November 2023 16: 57
    I wonder what will happen to it if a drone from an SVU flies into a container with mine clearance charges?
  16. +3
    16 November 2023 18: 24
    An engineering vehicle based on a tank does not bring anything new in terms of mine clearance. The crew has peace of mind behind such armor, but that’s all. Large, heavy, voracious. The trawling speed is probably low. It can somehow trawling mines installed in a straight line, but here’s how its trawl will react to a pair of TMs set to non-removable, it is unknown... I think it will perform well when clearing mines in areas not exposed to shelling, there is nothing for it to do on the front line
  17. +3
    16 November 2023 18: 26
    The weak point is the caterpillars. Kill it and that’s it, it will become a stationary target.
  18. +1
    16 November 2023 20: 20
    The car is very interesting, but you’ll have to use the Lancet to cut off everything unnecessary. And even better, if possible, into trophies, it’s a pity to spoil an excellent car from a technical point of view recourse
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. +3
    17 November 2023 03: 13
    It seems to me that this is truly a prodigy, but against a completely different opponent. Vulnerability is not higher than the main tank (their main tank), let’s assume the mobility is the same, then what?
    Using this miracle against an enemy with developed air defense and complete air superiority is a so-so strategy.
    Now, if it were against partisans, with one anti-tank rifle per squad, then yes, it will come in.
    I am sure that the Ukrainians will gnaw through passages for themselves with the help of extended charges, but they may not reach the trawls, although they may be suitable for clearing rockades.
    In my opinion, Pindas have already written off these devices and want to see exactly the methods of destruction and vulnerability.
    Two groups are watching this. One is from the manufacturer, which is doing everything to ensure that their creation does not fall under the distribution and shows its maximum result, the other group is from the Pentagon and they want to see these monsters in real conditions... Loot conquers evil.
    The group is from the manufacturer, anyone will buy the group from the Pentagon.....
  21. +2
    17 November 2023 06: 43
    The arrival of Lancet or Krasnopol in demining charges will be accompanied by a cool pyrotechnic show. I don’t think we’ll see it on the battlefield. How we don’t see Abrams.
  22. +1
    17 November 2023 10: 00
    The use of such IRM has its own characteristics.. Sailors have a rule: the speed of a caravan in mine-hazardous areas is determined by the speed of the minesweeper and all sorts of maneuvers are categorically not welcomed. If the Ukrainian Armed Forces use these machines on LBS, then this rule will work for MBT.
  23. 0
    17 November 2023 11: 05
    AND.. ? Well, we've arrived, what's next? As they profit, they will go away. Especially in single copies.
  24. 0
    17 November 2023 12: 26
    Terrible Shushpanzer. Straight up Siberian Barber laughing laughing laughing
  25. 0
    17 November 2023 15: 13
    Looks like little karbaras from a children's fairy tale movie
  26. 0
    17 November 2023 15: 16
    Quote: vovochkarzhevsky
    Well, now it’s all rags... or rather, their wassat. We just laid mines and forgot. Lancets scratch their wings


    Where do you even get such chesuns from? So you can really believe in Olgino.
    Curb your optimism. Lancets are far from wunderwaffe. Moreover, our ancient S-60s are already being removed from storage.

    For non-brothers, old shells will also do. Why spend new things on them, while warehouses need to be emptied in order to be filled with new weapons after the SVO. They are doing everything right.
  27. -1
    17 November 2023 16: 05
    If they wanted to, they would have caught all this scrap metal on trawls, it’s hard to hide something like that...
  28. 0
    17 November 2023 17: 03
    Well, it is clear that such engineering equipment is just suitable for the realities of the Northern Military District, how to use it is another matter, I really hope that our guys will be able to capture it, I don’t think that it will be very useful for our specialists, but studying the enemy’s equipment is necessary.
  29. 0
    17 November 2023 19: 16
    I would let this pepelats go through half of the minefield. Then - knock out the column coming behind it. Mine with Penicillin what she cleared. And invite the crew to surrender. With one machine gun without support, this fool won't fight much. I really want to study what’s inside this wunderwaffle :)
  30. 0
    17 November 2023 22: 26
    Yes, what is there to study, an ordinary bulldozer is only heavy and American.
  31. 0
    19 November 2023 17: 39
    Abrams maintenance is taught using these chassis
  32. 0
    20 November 2023 10: 42
    What is the point of launching mine clearance vehicles if behind the minefields there is artillery, crews of the Kornet anti-tank missiles, and the sky is dominated by attack aircraft and helicopters with anti-tank missiles. As soon as they enter a minefield, they will be immediately destroyed and that’s it.
  33. 0
    20 November 2023 14: 12
    Yeah, they shot off the charge and are STANDING, waiting for everything to straighten out there in order to detonate the charge, and ours are also STANDING and calmly looking at this sorcery. We have artillery, aviation, and UAV operators. Well, well, let the Ukrainians dare..
  34. 0
    24 November 2023 06: 36
    5 pieces won't make a difference. In general, too difficult for dummies
  35. 0
    25 November 2023 02: 24
    Why do the Kremlin idiots allow something to arrive in the saloon?
  36. 0
    25 November 2023 03: 40
    With such a mass, these vanderwafe will most likely hide in the rear until late spring, because in the mud this cow will get stuck very quickly and become a motionless target.