A new modification of the Krasnopol projectile shows its capabilities

25
A new modification of the Krasnopol projectile shows its capabilities
Projectile "Krasnopol" first version


From the very beginning of the current Special Operation to protect Donbass, Russian artillery has been actively using 152-mm 3OF39 Krasnopol guided artillery shells. In order to increase the effectiveness of its strikes, the industry has recently developed and brought to production a modernized version of such ammunition. Now it has become known that these products entered the combat zone, are used by calculations and show the required characteristics.



Application and modernization


The 2K25 guided weapon system based on the 3OF39 Krasnopol guided artillery projectile (UAS) is actively used in the Special Operations area to destroy various targets. Last year it was reported that the industry was expanding the production of such ammunition to meet the needs of artillery. In addition, the possibility of upgrading the existing UAS to improve performance was mentioned.

Exact information about the development of a modernized version of Krasnopol has not previously appeared. However, in mid-August 2023, the press service of the High-Precision Complexes holding announced the launch of production of such a UAS and the delivery of serial products to the troops. However, detailed information about such an update to the projectile, its characteristics, etc. were not provided for reasons of secrecy.

At the end of August RIA News, citing an unnamed informed source, spoke about the effectiveness of domestic UAS. It was reported that the Russian "Krasnopol" is superior in circular deviation probability to the American M982 Excalibur projectile. Often the projectile hits directly the aiming point, the center of the selected target. In addition, the Russian UAS is distinguished by its ability to hit moving objects.


3OF39 cross-section

However, RIA Novosti and their source did not specify which version of “Krasnopol” they were talking about. Judging by the mention of application statistics, the basic version of the UAS, which has long been available in the troops and is actively used, was considered.

However, there are also reports of a modernized projectile. On November 8, RIA Novosti published new information from “High-Precision Complexes.” It is reported that the modernized version of the Krasnopol has been successfully used in combat zones and demonstrates increased accuracy. If the conditions of use are met, the UAS hits the intended target.

It can be assumed that the production, supply and use of the modernized projectile will continue. Serial products will help solve common problems and collect new statistics. As these processes progress, new information about an improved version of the UAS should become available.

Technical issues


The 3OF39 “Krasnopol” product from the 2K25 complex, as well as its modifications, was regularly demonstrated at exhibitions and promoted on the market. Thanks to this, almost everything is known about the projectile - design features, principles of operation and application, tactical and technical characteristics, etc. The same applies to the main modifications of this UAS.


"Krasnopol-M2" at the exhibition

However, detailed information about the latest upgrade is not yet available. Official reports only mentioned improved target accuracy. How it was achieved, and whether other characteristics of the projectile have changed, is not reported. However, the available information about the basic Krasnopol allows us to imagine possible ways of its development that could be used in the new project.

Let us remind you that the 3OF39 “Krasnopol” of the first version is an artillery shell of 152 mm caliber, 1,3 m long. Weight – 50,8 kg. Several modifications with certain features have been developed. Thus, the 3OF39M version projectile, due to a different configuration, had a length of less than 1 m, and the K155 and K155M projects offered ammunition in 155 mm caliber for NATO guns.

The head of the projectile contains control equipment, incl. retractable steering wheels with steering gears. The central part contains the main charge weighing 6,3-11 kg, depending on the modification. The bottom contains a gas generator and retractable stabilizers. In the first version of the Krasnopol, the projectile body was disassembled into compartments to simplify transportation. Later we switched to a monoblock design.

All known versions of the UAS 3OF39 are equipped with a semi-active laser homing head. In this regard, the 2K25 complex includes a laser rangefinder-target designator used by artillery reconnaissance. It is also possible to use target designators on unmanned aerial platforms. The laser seeker provides a high probability of hitting an illuminated target - up to 0,8-0,9, depending on the modification. The CEP does not exceed several meters.


The Krasnopol-D projectile was also demonstrated at the exhibitions. A guidance system based on satellite navigation was developed for it. It was reported that such a seeker allows for high hit accuracy and does not require target illumination. At the same time, there was no possibility of firing at moving targets.

It can be assumed that the latest modernization project for the 3OF39 projectile, brought to series this year, continues precisely the original Krasnopol line. Such a UAS probably received an improved laser seeker and other control equipment. They had to be made on a modern element base. This modernization option has obvious advantages of a production, operational and combat nature. However, exactly how the electronics and other units were modified, and what results were obtained due to this, is unknown.

Factors of success


As part of the current Special Operation, our artillerymen use Krasnopol shells of two or three modifications. In all cases, the maximum result is achieved in the form of accurate destruction of intended targets, point and area, with minimal ammunition consumption. The high efficiency of such weapons is due to several main factors - both the successful design of the UAS itself and the systems used with it.

A significant contribution to the overall results was made by the development of reconnaissance and strike support systems. Previously, Krasnopol was criticized for the use of a laser seeker, which requires the presence of scouts with a target designator in the target area. Now the task of target identification and illumination is assigned to unmanned aviation complexes. They are able to work practically freely and without risks for operators throughout the entire artillery affected area, transmit data in real time, etc.


The implementation and improvement of automated troop control systems at the tactical level continues. With their help, data exchange between different means is simplified and accelerated, incl. transmitting information about the target, adjusting fire, etc. Combining artillery armed with UAS, even older modifications, with unmanned aircraft leads to well-known positive results.

The latest modernization of Krasnopol has increased its accuracy. In combination with other positive factors, this should lead to a new increase in the performance of our artillery - and have a positive impact on the actions of the ground forces as a whole.

Development continues


Thus, our defense industry simultaneously solves several important problems in the field of guided munitions. It continues the serial production of Krasnopol shells of existing modifications, and at the same time was able to develop and bring to production a new version of such ammunition with improved characteristics.

Unfortunately, the industry is in no hurry to reveal all the features of the new development and announce its characteristics. However, the lack of open information does not prevent Russian artillerymen from using the updated projectile and realizing all its advantages. And in the current situation, the real result is much more important than any advertising and information support.
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    14 November 2023 03: 45
    I wonder if "Krasnopol" was made in 155 mm version and sold to NATO? Is the Ukrainian Armed Forces using it against us? 152 mm accurately uses. The photos were posted by the Ukrainian Armed Forces themselves. soldier
    1. 0
      14 November 2023 07: 47
      Quote: V.
      I wonder if "Krasnopol" was made in 155 mm version and sold to NATO? Is the Ukrainian Armed Forces using it against us? 152 mm accurately uses. The photos were posted by the Ukrainian Armed Forces themselves. soldier

      NATO has a Copperhead, with a laser guidance system. Actively used during the Gulf War. It was killed at the concept level and now it has been replaced by Excalibur with GPS.
      1. +1
        8 January 2024 00: 23
        Quote from Escariot
        Quote: V.
        I wonder if "Krasnopol" was made in 155 mm version and sold to NATO? Is the Ukrainian Armed Forces using it against us? 152 mm accurately uses. The photos were posted by the Ukrainian Armed Forces themselves. soldier

        NATO has a Copperhead, with a laser guidance system. Actively used during the Gulf War. It was killed at the concept level and now it has been replaced by Excalibur with GPS.


        Yes, but during the Gulf War there were no drones that could easily adjust ammunition using a laser beam. I would say that both systems, laser and GPS, are good in their own way. GPS is less accurate and cannot be used against moving targets, but it is also less sensitive to the presence of target designation. Although it is more sensitive to electronic warfare.
        Laser guidance in combination with a large number of cheap drones may well become our prodigy, just like kamikaze drones. You just need to increase the range to 50-60 km and fill the front with them along with the eagles and victory in the war will become much closer.
        A GPS-guided projectile would also be nice for us, but we can do without it.
    2. +2
      14 November 2023 08: 58
      Quote: V.
      I wonder if "Krasnopol" was made in 155 mm version and sold to NATO? Is the Ukrainian Armed Forces using it against us?

      No, I wasn't interested at all.
      1. +2
        14 November 2023 19: 58
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        I wonder if "Krasnopol" was made in 155 mm version and sold to NATO? Is the Ukrainian Armed Forces using it against us?

        No, I wasn't interested at all.

        Well, you are in vain! France was once very interested in “Krasnopol” (that is, its army!). Actually, the development of “Krasnopol” in 155 mm caliber began on the French “initiative”! (They even indicated the number of shells that the French military wanted to order!) But, as always, envious Americans intervened! They “convinced” the French that it was not good for a NATO country (or, in fact, a NATO country) to “get involved” with non-NATO Russia, which had a tendency to “put a spoke in NATO’s wheels!”
        PS Yes! I almost forgot! A certain number of 155-mm Krasnopols were delivered to India!
    3. +4
      14 November 2023 22: 32
      They were and are being done. In service with India
  2. +7
    14 November 2023 06: 54
    in all cases, the maximum result is achieved in the form of accurate destruction of intended targets, point and area, with minimal ammunition consumption.
    This is what the artillery has been striving for since its inception. At first, this was achieved solely through the skills and eye of the bombardiers, then tables appeared for gun commanders and gunners, and with the development of technology, “smart” shells appeared.
    Sorry, the industry is in no hurry to reveal all the features of the new development and announce its characteristics.
    It’s strange, but what is the author’s regret? Is it that the enemy is not openly informed about their developments?
    1. +1
      14 November 2023 09: 14
      Quote: rotmistr60
      It’s strange, but what is the author’s regret? Is it that the enemy is not openly informed about their developments?

      This note is almost a copy of the article dated August 17. Yes, it looks a bit strange. Can only be explained by an unscrupulous desire to earn money.
    2. -2
      14 November 2023 21: 19
      Why secrecy? Well, they will say - the range has been increased, for example, to 40 km, will this make it easier for the dry landers? They won’t learn to dodge Krasnopol, even if you send them all the drawings along with the most detailed performance characteristics
  3. +1
    14 November 2023 07: 47
    Somehow the issue with range has been bypassed with the new development; the old version is significantly inferior to Excalibur.
  4. -10
    14 November 2023 08: 20
    Krasnopol is one of the strangest crafts of the domestic military industry and is a kind of copy of the American Copperhead, but very controversial. If the Americans planned to use their projectile as some kind of anti-tank weapon, for which they equipped it with a cumulative fragmentation warhead, then Krasnopol has a high-explosive warhead and, even despite its size, it cannot be guaranteed to hit a tank. We don’t have very many UAVs with laser illumination systems; DRGs are unlikely to carry such equipment behind enemy lines. To work directly on the line of combat contact such a long range is not needed. And the price of $30k per piece is quite serious.
    In the end, the Americans abandoned their Copperhead and switched to Excalibur, which, although it works worse against armored vehicles, is much better against unarmored targets with an air blast system, and it is much easier to aim it at a stationary target.
    1. +8
      14 November 2023 09: 53
      Quote from Escariot
      Krasnopol is one of the strangest crafts of the domestic military industry

      At the same time, it is very effective and efficient.
      Quote from Escariot
      Krasnopol’s warhead is high-explosive and even despite its size, it cannot be guaranteed to hit a tank.

      152 mm. the projectile "cannot" ?? Show me such a tank.
      It can very well.
      Quote from Escariot
      We don’t have very many UAVs with laser illumination systems,

      Now it's getting bigger. And although a laser guidance system is more expensive and requires external target designation, it can also work against moving targets. In addition, we already have the Krasnopol-D satellite navigation system, and when working on stationary targets they are very effective.
      Quote from Escariot
      . To work directly on the line of combat contact such a long range is not needed.

      lol This is not an ATGM. And artillery should operate from rear areas, preferably from a distance safe for return fire. "Coalition-SV" + "Krasnopol-D" is the ideal combination for effective artillery operation in the face of active enemy opposition. Incl. for counter-battery combat.
      Quote from Escariot
      In the end, the Americans abandoned their Copperhead and switched to Excalibur

      So much the worse for them and the Ukrainian Armed Forces. And we can completely suppress American navigation systems - let them shoot.
      Quote from Escariot
      And the price of $30k per piece is quite serious

      Mass production makes the product cheaper, but the goals are still more expensive.
      1. -11
        14 November 2023 11: 01
        Quote: bayard
        Quote from Escariot
        Krasnopol is one of the strangest crafts of the domestic military industry

        At the same time, it is very effective and efficient.
        Quote from Escariot
        Krasnopol’s warhead is high-explosive and even despite its size, it cannot be guaranteed to hit a tank.

        152 mm. the projectile "cannot" ?? Show me such a tank.
        It can very well.
        Quote from Escariot
        We don’t have very many UAVs with laser illumination systems,

        Now it's getting bigger. And although a laser guidance system is more expensive and requires external target designation, it can also work against moving targets. In addition, we already have the Krasnopol-D satellite navigation system, and when working on stationary targets they are very effective.
        Quote from Escariot
        . To work directly on the line of combat contact such a long range is not needed.

        lol This is not an ATGM. And artillery should operate from rear areas, preferably from a distance safe for return fire. "Coalition-SV" + "Krasnopol-D" is the ideal combination for effective artillery operation in the face of active enemy opposition. Incl. for counter-battery combat.
        Quote from Escariot
        In the end, the Americans abandoned their Copperhead and switched to Excalibur

        So much the worse for them and the Ukrainian Armed Forces. And we can completely suppress American navigation systems - let them shoot.
        Quote from Escariot
        And the price of $30k per piece is quite serious

        Mass production makes the product cheaper, but the goals are still more expensive.

        The T-55S completely survived a direct hit from Krasnopol. Are you unaware of this fact?
        There is no coalition in the troops, just like Krasnopol D. The enemy captured a number of ordinary Krasnopols near Izyum, but not a single Krasnopol-D, which proves that I am right.
        1. +6
          14 November 2023 11: 24
          Quote from Escariot
          The enemy captured a number of ordinary Krasnopols near Izyum, but not a single Krasnopol-D, which proves that I am right.

          Pig sty level logic! If you take a water sample from the sea with a spoon and study it, you can establish the fact that there are no dolphins in it! Reinforced concrete! laughing
          The T-55S completely survived a direct hit from Krasnopol. Are you unaware of this fact?
          Another reinforced concrete fact, farm level! But we know two facts about the T-55S not surviving the hit, do you know these facts? wassat
          1. -5
            14 November 2023 12: 13
            Quote: neri73-r
            Quote from Escariot
            The enemy captured a number of ordinary Krasnopols near Izyum, but not a single Krasnopol-D, which proves that I am right.

            Pig sty level logic! If you take a water sample from the sea with a spoon and study it, you can establish the fact that there are no dolphins in it! Reinforced concrete! laughing
            The T-55S completely survived a direct hit from Krasnopol. Are you unaware of this fact?
            Another reinforced concrete fact, farm level! But we know two facts about the T-55S not surviving the hit, do you know these facts? wassat

            Naturally, instead of facts, you immediately switched to insults. Typical demagogue tactics.
            The enemy captured so many Krasnopols that they even adopted them, but did not write about the capture of even a single Krasnopol-D. This means they were not physically in the warehouses in Izyum and Kherson.
          2. 0
            14 November 2023 20: 16
            Quote: neri73-r
            The T-55S completely survived a direct hit from Krasnopol. Are you unaware of this fact?
            Another reinforced concrete fact, farm level! But we know two facts about the T-55S not surviving the hit, do you know these facts?

            The Internet often gives an example of the use of 152-mm Krasnopols "somewhere" in Africa ("like" Angola...) As a result of the use of Krasnopols against tanks, the offensive of the opposing side, which was counting on a "massive" tank attack, was thwarted. ..the tanks were destroyed! (In my opinion, the tanks were T-54/55 type...)
        2. 0
          14 November 2023 19: 58
          Quote from Escariot
          The T-55S completely survived a direct hit from Krasnopol. Are you unaware of this fact?

          No, I don't know this fact. And even if this is so, it was probably not a direct hit. Even the Abrams with Leo-2 will not survive a direct hit (their sides, upper hull parts and turret roofs are much thinner than Soviet ones).
          Quote from Escariot
          There is no coalition in the troops, just like Krasnopol D.

          Coalitions are already joining the troops; they have been used before, but sporadically as part of tests. By spring there will already be enough of them in the troops for their presence to be very noticeable. And "Krasnopol-D" appeared in the troops at the turn of 2022 and 2023. Now there are more and more of them in the troops.
    2. +4
      14 November 2023 10: 15
      We don’t have very many UAVs with laser illumination systems; DRGs are unlikely to carry such equipment behind enemy lines. To work directly on the line of combat contact such a long range is not needed.

      The gun operates from the rear. At the front line, targets are illuminated with a laser, and they are hit with accurate fire. A very correct concept. There is no need to drag a backlight device behind enemy lines; there are UAVs for that.
      The projectile hits very accurately. It hits a stationary target in almost the same place, and the projectile hits the projectile. The mobile one is correspondingly worse, but also very high accuracy.
      The range is really not enough, I think this was the main modernization.
      1. -4
        14 November 2023 10: 57
        Quote: glory1974
        We don’t have very many UAVs with laser illumination systems; DRGs are unlikely to carry such equipment behind enemy lines. To work directly on the line of combat contact such a long range is not needed.

        The gun operates from the rear. At the front line, targets are illuminated with a laser, and they are hit with accurate fire. A very correct concept. There is no need to drag a backlight device behind enemy lines; there are UAVs for that.
        The projectile hits very accurately. It hits a stationary target in almost the same place, and the projectile hits the projectile. The mobile one is correspondingly worse, but also very high accuracy.
        The range is really not enough, I think this was the main modernization.

        Great. You will have to use a laser guidance system instead of an ATGM. And if the use of an ATGM is determined by the company or platoon commander, then to use the wonderful Krasnopol you will have to contact the artillerymen. Until the team reaches such a long chain of the enemy, the trace is gone.
        Well, are there many of our UAVs with lasers behind enemy lines? Moreover, the enemy is really weak in air defense. With a coordinate guidance system it is much simpler, because one photograph of the area is enough to determine and direct the projectile to the right place, but a UAV with a laser will be forced to hover in the target area and highlight the target. Complete nonsense.
        1. +2
          14 November 2023 12: 10
          “Complete nonsense” - there are enough facts of successful application. Reconnaissance UAVs often have laser equipment for illumination. To be fair, it only takes a few seconds to shine. And without reconnaissance UAVs, any firing of guided missiles is pointless. And if the UAV sees the target, it will be able to illuminate it. And besides, the company commander has nothing to do with work in the near rear (and this is what guided projectiles are mainly for) - he can neither reconnoiter nor hit.
        2. +2
          15 November 2023 10: 21
          to use the wonderful Krasnopol you will have to contact the artillerymen. Until the team reaches such a long chain of the enemy, the trace is gone.

          This is a standard combination: a laser target designator on an artillery reconnaissance officer - a communication channel - a battery. Designed to destroy moving targets. Stationary targets in the depths of the defense are destroyed from commanding heights. In general, elementary tactics.
          Everything has been worked out. It occupies its niche. Shooting at coordinates is another niche. A different projectile is needed there.
  5. +1
    14 November 2023 11: 11
    ...there are several videos on the network from tests of the "Zskalibur", where the capabilities of the ammunition and its characteristics are demonstrated.....apparently a similar video was written during the testing of the "Krasnopol" .... it would certainly be interesting to watch it and post it in this article...
    and the information, even repeated three times in this material, is not enough...
  6. -1
    14 November 2023 20: 23
    the laser guidance system has its pros and cons compared to GPS guidance, but we are glad that if in fact the target illumination is completely transferred to the UAV, and not to suicide bombers behind enemy lines, then it is quite a modern option
  7. 0
    16 November 2023 14: 58
    Another blabla ordering slobbering...
  8. +1
    9 December 2023 10: 31
    Kirill could have written: a new Krasnopol shell about which nothing is known, period.