“Frankenstein air defense system” for Ukrainian air defense

24
“Frankenstein air defense system” for Ukrainian air defense
Buk air defense system, modified to use AIM-7 missiles. Photo Telegram / "Vestnik Air Defense"


Foreign patrons are trying to help the Kyiv regime with the restoration of the destroyed air defense, but are faced with a lack of anti-aircraft systems and missiles. In this regard, the development of “hybrid” air defense systems based on available components, incl. produced in different countries. Several options for such technology have been proposed, and some of them have already reached, at least, testing.



Problems and solutions


About a year ago, foreign countries began supplying the Kyiv regime with modern air defense systems and ammunition for them. Almost immediately it became clear that their existing fleet of such equipment and its production could not cover the needs of Ukrainian formations and compensate for losses. A new solution was required, simple, inexpensive and with an acceptable implementation time.

In mid-September, the Beregini hacker group published an interesting document from the NATO Contact Group on Ukraine, prepared for its next meeting on July 18. It reflected the main actions and plans of the Alliance to support the Kyiv regime in the context of air defense and some other systems.

From the document, the existence of the FrankenSAM program (“Frankenstein SAM”) became known for the first time. Its goal was to create a new modification of the serial Buk air defense system, capable of using AIM-7 Sparrow or RIM-7 Sea Sparrow missiles. This project was included in the number of medium-term ones, the implementation of which requires from 6 to 30 months. It was mentioned that the United States is developing it, and the required missiles will be provided by the Netherlands.


Shipborne air defense system based on AIM-7 / RIM-7. Photo by US Department of Defense

Several recent US military aid packages for Ukraine have included AIM-9M Sidewinder air-to-air missiles. Official press releases from the Pentagon stated that they were intended for use in the field of air defense, but without specifying technical issues. However, recently the situation has become clearer.

On October 12, The Associated Press, citing its sources in the American military department, wrote that the supply of AIM-9M missiles to Ukraine is related to the FrankenSAM project. So, based on the available components, incl. aviation missiles, a full-fledged air defense system was created. At the same time, technical details were again not disclosed.

In the following weeks, the foreign press wrote about the Frankenstein SAM project several times, but there was little or no new interesting information. However, on October 28, The New York Times published an article on this topic, clarifying the features of the work carried out and revealing some plans for the future.

According to the NYT, work on FrankenSAM continues and is yielding new results. To date, four variants of such complexes have been developed based on available ground-based assets and missiles of various types. Some of them are already being tested or have even reached combat use. In particular, we recalled recent reports from Kyiv about the first use of the HAWK air defense system. It is alleged that American-made missiles were used by a non-standard complex.

Frankenstein's monster


To date, it has become known from various sources about the development of at least four variants of the appearance of the FrankenSAM air defense system. They differ in composition, purpose and characteristics, but have a common feature in the form of a combination of components and products of different origins. It is proposed to use foreign missiles and Soviet-style ground assets available in Ukraine or other countries.


Launching an AIM-9M missile from an aircraft. Photo by US Department of Defense

In the context of the FrankenSAM program, the first to be mentioned in open sources was an air defense system based on the Soviet Buk and the American AIM-7 / RIM-7 missile. This project involves equipping a self-propelled launcher with new devices for mounting three transport and launch containers with imported missiles. In addition, new radio-electronic equipment and software are being installed to ensure the joint operation of the complex.

The development of two more “Frankenstein air defense systems” with AIM-9M and HAWK missiles is reported, but their appearance remains unknown. Perhaps in this case, the base from the old Buk air defense system is also used, modernized to receive and use foreign missiles.

Another project provides a different approach to the construction of the complex. In essence, we are talking about the modernization of the American Patriot air defense system. It is proposed to retain its standard launchers and missiles, and instead of the original radar, the 79K6 Pelican product or another Ukrainian-made locator with suitable characteristics should be used.

During production


Apparently, the development of FrankenSAM projects started no later than the first months of 2023. To date, it has been possible to complete the design of several such samples and even bring them to testing. It is also reported that the first air defense systems of this family arrived in Ukraine and even went on combat duty.

It is known from Ukrainian sources that air defense units have already received several Buk complexes with AIM-7 missiles. In total, it is planned to supply 17 such products. The modernization of equipment is carried out by American forces, and the available capacities allow the production of up to five products per month. Operation of a similar complex with HAWK missiles has also begun. However, plans for its production and deployment remain unknown.


Supposedly the first use of the HAWK air defense system by the Ukrainian army. Photo of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine

According to various sources, the “Frankenstein air defense system” with the AIM-9 missile is only being tested. A modified version of the Patriot with non-standard means also recently reached testing. In October, the first missile launches took place against unmanned targets detected by Ukrainian radar.

Possible results


The FrankenSAM program uses well-known components and products of Soviet and American production. This allows us to understand what such air defense systems can be like, what level of tactical and technical characteristics they will show, and how effective they will be.

The Buk air defense system of early modifications, developed back in Soviet times, is used as a platform for foreign missiles. Such a complex includes a standard 9S18 / 9S18M1 “Kupol” air target detection radar. Depending on the characteristics, the target is detected and tracked at a distance of 100-110 km.

The self-propelled firing installation of the Buk complexes of the 9A38 or 9A310 type carries its own target tracking radar. Its range exceeds the launch range of standard missiles and is at least 30-32 km. When using imported missiles, such characteristics remain sufficient or even become redundant.

As part of the Frankenstein SAM program, the Ukrainian Buk was equipped with the American AIM-7 / RIM-7 missile. This is a medium-range air-to-air missile with a semi-active radar homing head. When used from a fighter aircraft, the Sparrow missile has a range of up to 70 km. Its ship version, RIM-7, due to the need for independent take-off and acceleration, hits targets at ranges of no more than 20-30 km.


Launch of AIM-9 from NASAMS ground installation. Kongsberg Photos

The AIM-9 Sidewinder, in turn, is a short-range air-to-air missile. The 3 m long product weighs 85 kg and is equipped with an infrared seeker. Depending on the modification, the range of such a missile can reach 30-35 km. At the same time, launching from a ground platform will seriously deteriorate the energy performance of the rocket and reduce the launch range.

The MIM-23 missile from the HAWK complex was originally created as an anti-aircraft missile, and its installation on a new platform should not worsen its tactical and technical characteristics. The product, more than 5 m long and weighing 590 kg, is equipped with a semi-active radar seeker and requires target illumination from the ground. The launch range is at least 40-45 km.

The American Patriot air defense system is standardly equipped with the AN/MPQ-65 radar with a detection range of air targets of up to 130-180 km. Modernization under the FrankenSAM project involves replacing this product with another radar with similar characteristics. In this case, it is necessary to ensure the ability to illuminate the target, etc. Replacing the locator can significantly reduce the cost of the assembled complex and reduce objective risks.

Interim results


Thus, foreign partners of the Kyiv regime have encountered problems in restoring Ukrainian air defense and are now looking for a way out of this situation. A simple supply of air defense systems from the presence of foreign armies is not possible due to their limited number and the increased risk of their destruction. Therefore, it is necessary to work out and implement unusual solutions.

It is alleged that the first “Frankenstein air defense systems” have already arrived in Ukraine and are on combat duty. In the absence of reasonable alternatives, high hopes are now placed on them. However, it is already clear that foreign-developed “hybrid” air defense systems, despite their simplicity and low cost, will not be able to become widespread, and their tactical and technical characteristics will be insufficient to influence the current situation.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    31 October 2023 05: 59
    It’s not exactly a hedgehog crossed with a snake, but what actually comes out of it, time and the final result will tell.
    So it looks like this... "let me go!"
    1. +3
      31 October 2023 06: 57
      Not exactly a hedgehog crossed with a snake, but what will really come of it?

      ...and the length is not very good, and it hurts so-so...
      Frankensteins were made by everyone, everywhere and always, but very rarely they turned out to be worthwhile designs.
      1. 0
        31 October 2023 07: 59
        It seems to depend on the depth, the degree of modification of the structure... you can cut everything off, down to the wheels/tracks and place everything else, but they don’t then do it so that it turns out super, duper. More like a mechanism for recycling old, useless anti-aircraft missiles...
        It is unlikely that they will redo it to the full required depth.... more like... we don’t know, but it will do for you.
        We are waiting for fireworks in a thicker range than from the patriots... with the same “useful” effect.
  2. +9
    31 October 2023 06: 56
    I understand that the author is very “patriotic,” but the limits of “patriotism” should be limited by common sense. The use of air-to-air missiles in air defense systems became common in the West 40 years ago. It’s strange that Kirill has not heard of such widespread air defense systems as MIM-72 Chaparral, Antelope, Skyguard-Sparrou, Aspide and NASAMS.
    1. +1
      31 October 2023 08: 03
      During the war, we launched aviation RS from slate when there were no other options... the effect was that the enemy was scared because it was noisy. Although, the explosion of fragmentation ammunition in the ranks of the enemy, yes, caused quite a bit of damage.... the main thing is to hit it correctly.
      1. +3
        31 October 2023 08: 20
        Quote: rocket757
        During the war, we launched aviation RS from slate when there were no other options... the effect was that the enemy was scared because it was noisy. Although, the explosion of fragmentation ammunition in the ranks of the enemy, yes, caused quite a bit of damage.... the main thing is to hit it correctly.

        You want to say that the modern NASAMS air defense system. with AIM-120 AMRAAM can only scare? Considering that you have a Soviet S-125M launcher on your screensaver, this is very strange.
        1. +2
          31 October 2023 09: 42
          Of course it’s STRANGE, considering that I didn’t write that it wouldn’t work at all and emphasized many of the nuances of the modernization/adaptation process, about which, for obvious reasons, little is known!
          He also specifically indicated that it is necessary to SEE WHAT THE EFFECTIVENESS OF the rework WILL BE, to collect statistics... although this will be difficult to do, for objective reasons... the fog of war, censorship and a lot, a lot of empty chatter, around and around.
          In general, there are doubts that can be confirmed or refuted over time, if possible, of course...
          Regarding C 125... it was a long time ago and not for long, then I worked on something else, in the same field, but further, wider, higher...
    2. -4
      31 October 2023 10: 53
      -about such widespread air defense systems as MIM-72 Chaparral,
      Sergey, it looks like he will be the “donor” for the production of the FrankenSAM HYBRID.
      In general, another illiquid stock. And the missiles, most likely, are “not the first time.”
      1. 0
        31 October 2023 19: 33
        There will be surplus stock from warehouses and other delays... who knows, but as already known facts have shown, they don’t really give them much new stuff, it’s more like disposing of surplus stock/junk.
        Foreign bosses know how to count dunyushka, and why should they puff themselves up, they try to supply new things if they will already get their “sweet pie” from old ones.
        1. -1
          31 October 2023 22: 10
          Yes, in fact, the Ukrainian PPO of the 2022 model is also illiquid and overdue, probably half of the missiles only flew towards the target, and the second half - well, wherever necessary, maybe in a forest, maybe in a field, maybe in a high-rise building.
  3. Eug
    +4
    31 October 2023 08: 37
    The idea, in my opinion, is very interesting - from ready-made elements that were developed independently, to create a single and combat-ready product. We'll see....
  4. +2
    31 October 2023 09: 54
    The photo shows a launcher from the KUB air defense system.
    http://militaryrussia.ru/i/284/421/Qyypp.jpg
    But from Buk
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8f/ZRK_BUK_M1_2005_G1.jpg?uselang=ru
  5. +1
    31 October 2023 11: 15
    Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus is a novel by English writer Mary Shelley, first published in 1818.

    The book tells about the life and works of the scientist Victor Frankenstein, who managed to learn how to revive lifeless matter. Frankenstein creates an artificial man from parts of corpses, but later disowns his creation. A nameless monster, hated by people for its ugliness, begins to haunt its creator.

    Apparently the literary work predicts the ending of this project. The monster created by Frankenstein will destroy him.
  6. -3
    31 October 2023 11: 40
    They made it...... The geldings have already reached the point where they are trying to make something up on their knees!!! They also said that they had the “most powerful” production!!! laughing laughing laughing
  7. -5
    31 October 2023 11: 40
    They made it...... The geldings have already reached the point where they are trying to make something up on their knees!!! They also said that they had the “most powerful” production!!! laughing laughing laughing
    1. +4
      31 October 2023 18: 47
      Quote from BlacTiger74
      They made it...... The geldings have already reached the point where they are trying to make something up on their knees!!! They also said that they had the “most powerful” production!!! laughing laughing laughing

      Why "on the knee"? This system (Buk/Kub launcher + Sea Sparrow missile) was developed privately by Raytheon 15 years ago. Then this corporation offered similar modernization to the countries of Eastern Europe. It didn’t take off that time, but the developments remained. Now these developments have been pulled out from under the cloth and put into action. There are a huge number of Sea Sparrows in the US Navy warehouses and they can be put into action, especially since the US itself is abandoning this system.
  8. +1
    31 October 2023 11: 47
    Translated from false English into Russian, the advanced military-industrial complex of the United States and NATO countries is not capable of producing air defense systems in sufficient quantities, at an affordable price, and with a sufficient degree of reliability. After this, don’t talk about the overwhelming military power of NATO and the United States.
    1. +3
      1 November 2023 13: 14
      Quote: Dzenn
      Translated from English lying, into Russian

      Translated from English deceitful into truthful Russian, last summer the task was set to work on relatively cheap means of high-intensity warfare, albeit not the most effective: with the obvious goal of maintaining the current course of the Northern Military District for an indefinitely long time for relatively moderate money.
      Quote: Dzenn
      After this, don’t talk about the overwhelming military power of NATO and the United States.

      Where did she go?
  9. +6
    31 October 2023 14: 07
    It’s worth learning from the creativity and tenacity of our partners, who don’t whine, but figure out how to get out of the current situation.
    1. 0
      1 November 2023 21: 06
      Actually, they wouldn’t have had to get out of it if they hadn’t put themselves in this situation. However, Grandpa Joe is already starting to receive unpleasant questions from Republicans: are you going to win at all, you stooping brute, and why are you still playing giveaway?
  10. -2
    31 October 2023 17: 05
    Quote from alexoff
    It’s worth learning from the creativity and tenacity of our partners, who don’t whine, but figure out how to get out of the current situation.


    Why do we need to “get out” by giving birth to all sorts of ugly designs with incomprehensible effectiveness?

    We are simply increasing the production of modern air defense systems, which, yes, are still in short supply.
    1. +2
      31 October 2023 18: 28
      We have a lot of things that are not very new, and a lot of things that are not really used. Finish the ancient anti-ship missiles for work on ground targets, update the point-y, learn how to attach a remote control system to old longboats and launch them towards the Odessa port. And leave modern funds for Ukrainian sponsors, you don’t think that there won’t be a second and third round?
  11. 0
    8 December 2023 16: 09
    “Students in slippers” fired at Emirati?-Fu15, R-27 missiles generally with guns made from rams and sticks
  12. fiv
    0
    11 December 2023 20: 26
    The best way to combat ukroair defense is a saber in the officer’s car and a dagger in the barracks, school, and the position area (especially in the city) cannot be completely covered. And let the Frankensteins stand without calculations.