Israel began using Iron Sting guided mortar mines

17
Israel began using Iron Sting guided mortar mines
Self-propelled mortar CARDOM fires Iron Sting mine during exercises


As part of the ongoing military operation against the militant wing of the Hamas movement, the Israeli armed forces are using a wide range of different types of weapons, including the newest samples. Thus, a few days ago they announced the first use of the Iron Sting 120-mm guided mortar mine. This product entered service in the recent past and until now could only show its potential and characteristics in test conditions.



Perspective development


For many years, the Israeli company Israel Military Industries / IMI Systems has been developing guided rounds for mortars. In 2018, it became part of Elbit Systems as a division responsible for land systems. The reformed Elbit Systems Land continued the development of mortar mines and brought several examples of this kind to the market.

Among other projects, since the beginning of the tenth years, IMI / Elbit has been developing the Iron Sting guided mine. The goal of this project was to create a 120 mm mortar ammunition with an improved control system. Unlike other similar ammunition, the “Sting” was supposed to receive three guidance systems at once, operating on different principles.

Creating a compact and lightweight combined guidance system that can withstand all loads turned out to be quite a difficult task and took several years. Only towards the end of the XNUMXs the mine was submitted for testing, which again took a lot of time.


Hamas MLRS detected by Israeli reconnaissance UAV

The tests continued until the beginning of 2021 and were completed successfully. Based on their results, the Israel Defense Forces adopted the Iron Sting mine for service. Serial production was launched and the process of integrating ammunition into the troops began. It was reported that it would be used by battalion-level 120mm mortars. Due to such a mine, it was planned to give them new combat capabilities, which had previously been provided only by missile systems.

Details of the production and supply of the Iron Sting, for obvious reasons, were not reported. However, it is known that in 2021-23. The IDF received several batches of new mines, mastered them and distributed them among units equipped with Keshet self-propelled mortar systems (Soltam CARDOM).

The Iron Sting mine and other similar developments are regularly shown at foreign military-technical exhibitions in order to attract potential buyers. As far as we know, such ammunition has not yet found its customer abroad. Possibly the last news will become advertising and will help Elbit Systems promote the “Sting”.

First application


According to known data, since their adoption in 2021, Iron Sting mines have been regularly used as part of various training activities. Despite the difficult situation in the region, there was no reason for real combat use. However, not long ago the situation changed.


Mine explosion and target destruction

On October 22, the IDF press service announced the start of the use of new guided mines. Special forces unit No. 212 "Maglan" is participating in Operation Iron Swords. Its task is to identify and defeat enemy targets and weapons in the Gaza Strip and on the border with Lebanon.

In recent days, combatant 120-mm mortars with Iron Sting-type rounds have been used to fire at some of the identified targets. At the time of the official report, the unit had expended at least 10 such mines. It was alleged that a significant amount of enemy weapons and ammunition, at least a hundred militants, etc. were destroyed. Due to this, it was possible to prevent further shelling and border crossings.

Attached to the press release was a short video filmed by a reconnaissance drone. First, the ground launcher of the multiple launch rocket system and the shells taking off from it were captured in the frame. Then they showed the moment the controlled mine fell and exploded. Judging by the flash, the ammunition actually hit the launcher or field ammunition depot.

Apparently, not only the Maglan unit has Iron Sting mines, and they can also use them in battles. It cannot be ruled out that guided munitions are already being actively used, and the IDF will talk about this again in the near future. At the same time, as the first time, they will bravoly report on the successful and accurate defeat of all intended targets.


Target hit during testing, 2021

Three guidance systems


The goal of the Iron Sting project was to create a promising guided munition with improved combat qualities for existing 120-mm mortar systems. The problem of increasing the accuracy and power of ammunition was solved through the simultaneous use of different guidance systems and a multi-mode fuse. As a result, in its design and appearance, the “Iron Sting” is noticeably different from other mines, incl. guided munitions from IMI/Elbit.

The Iron Sting mine is made in an elongated torpedo-shaped body of the maximum possible volume with a shortened shank. In the center of the body there are deployable rudders, and in the tail there is a stabilizer of a similar design. Control devices are located in the head and central parts of the body; the remaining volumes are given over to the bursting charge. The tubular shank accommodates the propellant charge, and additional charges can also be installed. The total length of the mine is 950 mm, weight – 10,8 kg.

The ammunition is equipped with a combined control system. It includes satellite and inertial navigation devices, a semi-active laser homing head and an autopilot that generates commands for the rudders. There are three modes of operation of the equipment: coordinate guidance using satellite and inertial systems, a combination of INS and laser seeker, as well as the simultaneous use of all devices.

To use such a mine, some additional devices are required. Thus, the target coordinates are entered using a standardized programmer included in various mortar systems, such as CARDOM. It takes 15 seconds to prepare the ammunition for firing. When using a semi-active seeker, the assistance of a gunner with a laser rangefinder-target designator is required. In search mode for a laser-illuminated target, Iron Sting shows a CEP of no more than 1 m. Navigation systems give a CEP of up to 10 m.


Demonstration of mine accuracy during testing

The high-explosive fragmentation warhead of the mine is detonated at the command of a three-mode fuse. It fires upon contact with a target, with a set delay or at a set height above the surface.

It is reported that the guided “Sting” is compatible with all 120-mm mortars of NATO standards. At the same time, the mine is primarily intended for the CARDOM complex and is compatible with its standard fire control system and programmer. Other mortars must be additionally equipped with appropriate devices.

Current direction


One of the main ways of developing artillery, incl. mortar, and increasing its combat qualities in recent decades is the development of adjustable and guided ammunition. All countries that have their own ammunition industry are trying to create such products and bring them into service. Israel is no exception - in recent decades, its industry has developed a lot of different guided missiles.

Modern guided munitions are generally similar to each other and are based on common solutions. However, there are interesting exceptions. An example of this is the Israeli product Iron Sting. To improve key characteristics, it was equipped with several guidance systems and a multi-mode fuse. The resulting 120-mm mine successfully passed tests and entered service. Now it is being tested as part of a real military operation, and so far only positive feedback has been received.
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    26 October 2023 08: 27
    Well what can I say? Thing . I wonder how much it costs and the resistance of a satellite channel to electronic warfare.
    1. 0
      26 October 2023 17: 47
      "The cost of one guided mine (using the example of NATO UAS) is approximately equivalent to the cost of 250-300 conventional (unguided) mortar mines." ©
      Here you can calculate
      Complex KM-8 "Gran" - the cost of guided ammunition is 30-35 thousand dollars apiece (2016).
      1. 0
        1 November 2023 12: 14
        They have different purposes. Conventional mines usually have area or weakly protected targets. And high-precision armored vehicles and stationary objects.
  2. +3
    26 October 2023 08: 29
    This is a continuation of the debate that it is better to have one good thing but it is expensive, or a lot is not very good but it is cheap.
    The mine is very expensive, it was written for service only with special units.
    1. +1
      26 October 2023 08: 32
      In a normal situation, it’s easier to bombard an area in a series, it won’t hit you with shrapnel.
      1. +3
        26 October 2023 08: 34
        I am writing an eternal argument.
        “Yesterday the crayfish were big, but for three rubles, and today they were for a ruble, but small, well, very small.”
      2. +1
        1 November 2023 12: 20
        So it is so, so it is of course. But the enemy has a high level of artillery reconnaissance assets and effective counter-battery warfare. So, in each case you need to approach it specifically. If the mortar crew is covered, then payments for the wounded and dead will be many times higher than the cost of a high-precision mine. Sometimes it’s not a sin to spend money on a controlled mine, especially if the goal is worthwhile.
    2. 0
      26 October 2023 09: 32
      For a demonstrative execution, the house of a terrorist is just right. To win the war, it's costly. Suitable for special operations.
  3. 0
    26 October 2023 09: 36
    Well, if my memory serves me right, then there was some information on the Internet that Russia had developed an improved “Gran” mine... the so-called “Gran-1”! If the previous "Gran" is equipped with an INS and a laser seeker, then "Gran-1" additionally has a GPS (GLONASS) module...
    1. +1
      26 October 2023 16: 14
      Promising does not mean getting married! Developing does not mean setting up production and launching deliveries to the troops!
  4. 0
    26 October 2023 09: 56
    Iron dome, iron swords, iron sting... Are they missing iron?) or imagination)))
  5. +4
    26 October 2023 12: 51
    While some people are buzzing, others are already doing it and even using it. I scouted and suppressed. Without long processing of areas.
    It’s probably hard to sit in a trench when you know that there is no more luck “whether you hit or miss.” It will hit. Not the first, but the second. With the appearance of every smart bomb, shell, and mine at the front. Inevitability is scary. Nobody wants to get hit by a highmars, Krasnopol, or run away from a lancet or kamikaze drone.
    The race is no longer only based on the criteria of “more powerful”, “further”, “cheaper”, but also MORE ACCURATE. Launching a dozen missiles that with a 99% probability will damage every bridge in a large city, isn’t that what we should strive for?
    1. 0
      11 January 2024 18: 07
      Launch a dozen missiles that have a 99% chance of damaging every bridge

      This is a complex matter and must be resolved comprehensively. Of course you have to strive. But missile defense, air defense, and electronic warfare are also not asleep. If they are guaranteed to shoot down the first 50 missiles and 50% of the next 200, then what is the point of 10 expensive high-precision missiles? What if they are guaranteed to be shot down?

      And the bourgeoisie has now also come to grips with the fact that the margins of fashionable high-precision ammunition are an order of magnitude (or even orders of magnitude) higher than conventional ones. Why bother firing 1000 regular shells per hour when you can fire 10 uncommon ones for more profit?
      And suddenly it turns out that unusual shells are not a panacea. And hundreds of thousands of ordinary ones are needed. But they are not there. And there are no production facilities. And there are no workers.
  6. 0
    31 October 2023 12: 46
    Rocket launch vehicles are the most effective, this was proven under Khrushchev.
    The mortar mine is the easiest target for C-RAM systems.
    The fact that no one has efficient C-RAM systems is another topic for discussion.
  7. 0
    22 January 2024 18: 01
    It seems to me that from the cost of any ammunition you need to subtract the cost of the target plus possible damage. Well, that’s the same thing... The advantage of such ammunition is that one or two shots and you hit the target and leaving the position is justified by the result. And you know how ordinary mines fall, at the same time, five shots with dubious results and you need to make a move. But again, the result is important in the shortest possible time. There is no time to throw one hundred and two hundred mines. In general, the SVO at its beginning and now has shown how terrible losses can be when using the same FPV Drones, they They screw up even single fighters because they are clearly no more expensive than equipment and psychological state, and hence the combat effectiveness of soldiers
  8. +1
    9 February 2024 11: 55
    And why is this mine better than a UAV? They have another project, I don’t know whether it was accepted for service or not. The mine can be propelled onto reverse slopes using micromotors, and this mine contained the guidance methods specified in the article.
  9. 0
    11 February 2024 11: 38
    Thanks to the author, very high quality article, great.