ATACMS have arrived: the United States will supply Ukraine with weapons until we strike their foreign military bases

177
ATACMS have arrived: the United States will supply Ukraine with weapons until we strike their foreign military bases

“The US and Western coalition military base in the border town of al-Tanf, located 250 km from Damascus, was attacked by three unmanned aerial vehicles...” (Al Jazeera)

How many red lines have been drawn since the beginning of the Russian Special Military Operation (SVO) in Ukraine - it’s impossible to count! Just recently there was the line of non-delivery of cluster munitions to the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) has been passed, and now the time has come for ATACMS operational-tactical missiles.

Having received ATACMS missiles, the Ukrainian Armed Forces immediately launched a massive attack on the Russian airfield in Berdyansk - there were killed and wounded, military equipment was destroyed and damaged. As much as you like talk about the need to improve aviation security at airfields, but this will not solve the problem. Today the Ukrainian Armed Forces hit an airfield, tomorrow they hit ammunition depots or military bases, and then the missiles will fly at our cities, especially since the same USA is transmitting intelligence to them, most likely in a time scale close to real.



It is impossible to defend against this 100% - to shoot down all missiles or build highly protected shelters for all weapons and personnel. It will be necessary to evacuate the population and industry beyond the Urals, as during the Great Patriotic War, to push the army airfields deep into the rear and disperse aviation, ammunition and military equipment warehouses, which will lead to a significant reduction in their effectiveness.

It will get worse, once again without receiving a rebuff The USA, Great Britain and their henchmen are organizing the supply of even longer-range ammunition to Ukraine, for example, such as JASSM-ER cruise missiles (CR) with a flight range of about 1 kilometers. Where will we then relocate the aviation – to the Far East?

It is necessary to take unprecedentedly tough measures, not in words, but in deeds, and there is only one effective way to do this - to organize strikes on US military bases located on the territory of third countries.

Window of opportunity


No matter how cynical it may sound, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is beneficial for Russia. The point here is not only that the financial flows that were previously sent to Ukraine will largely be reoriented to help Israel, and the priority supply of arms to Israel to the detriment of Ukraine - some analysts, having examined this issue, concluded that arms supplies to Israel and Ukraine for the most part do not overlap in nomenclature (although they partially overlap).

The main resource that generates the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is hatred. Hatred of Israel and the United States, which Israel sponsors and supports. There is no need for us to hate Israel, at least as long as Israel does not intervene in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, at least officially. But hatred towards the United States is a resource that can and should be used.

At the moment, the United States has covered the entire planet with its military bases. On the one hand, this poses a threat to many countries of the world, including Russia, on the other hand, it provides us with an excessively large list of potential targets that could be struck.


Al Udeid Air Force Base in Qatar is a legitimate target for a strike

Of course, it is necessary to choose those objects near which there are many who want to strike at them, but do not have such an opportunity. Considering the realities of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, there are more than enough volunteers - primarily in countries where the Arab population predominates, but African countries with a predominantly Muslim population cannot be written off.

All that remains is to direct the fighters against American imperialism in the “right direction” and provide them with suitable tools.

Voentorg


The CCCP and Russia have extensive experience in supplying weapons to various regions of the world. Even now, Soviet/Russian weapons are actively used in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict zone. It is necessary to ensure the supply of weapons to those state and non-state formations that have the necessary qualifications and determination to use them for their intended purpose, that is, to strike US military bases.

Perhaps one of the most effective types of weapons that can be used to strike US military bases is the Grad multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) of 122 mm caliber. Grad MLRS launchers themselves are available in abundance in many regions of the world. Of particular interest are transportable single-barrel Grad-P launchers, which can be useful if it is unsafe to approach US military bases within launch range with the Grad MLRS.

For the US to take the hint, it will be necessary to secure a supply of cluster munitions, which can be supplemented by incendiary munitions. Several dozen such ammunition fired in one salvo will be almost impossible to intercept, as a result of which the attacked US military base will suffer significant damage with numerous casualties among personnel.


MLRS "Grad", "Grad-P" and 122-mm cluster rocket

MLRS strikes can be complemented by FPV attacksdrones-kamikaze. Most likely, the supply of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) - kamikazes of the Lancet type - is an excessive measure - there are few of them, but numerous “folk” FPV drones will be very useful. They can be used both to attack ground targets and low-speed air targets - during the conflict in Ukraine, cases of destruction of aircraft by FPV drones have already been noted.


FPV kamikaze drones "Ghoul" can drink blood from the US Armed Forces

Anti-tank missile systems (ATGM) and man-portable air defense systems (MANPADS) are classics of the genre, few weapon is more effective for conducting guerrilla warfare against regular armed forces. As part of the solution to the task of causing maximum damage to the US Armed Forces, they should be used as a priority to destroy air targets, for example, transport and combat helicopters flying at low altitude, aircraft taking off or landing.

It is better to destroy ground military equipment using mine-explosive means, a wide range of which can also be supplied from Russia to the relevant friendly structures - so that US soldiers are afraid to stick their nose outside the perimeter of their bases.
It is necessary to understand that the concept of “friendly structures” refers to situational allies, whose goals in the future may diverge from ours, therefore the supply of weapons to them should be limited to the tasks being solved and strictly controlled by “advisers”.

Recently, the Yemeni Houthis launched an attack on an American warship using missiles of an unknown type. All missiles were intercepted by the ship's self-defense means. It is possible that a more effective means of destroying US Navy ships will be sea mines placed along their patrol routes in the Gaza Strip and naval bases in other regions. It is desirable to supply sea mines of the same type that the Ukrainian Armed Forces used to mine the Black Sea, with a hint from where they were “brought by the current.”

Another method of destroying American ships is the use of unmanned boats (BEC) - kamikazes, made from components produced in Western countries. This issue was previously discussed in detail in the material “The destruction of British Navy warships by unidentified unmanned boats is a signal to all NATO countries.”.

By the way, if American ships hang around the coast, they can also be attacked by FPV drones - they will not cause much damage, but they are quite capable of disabling the radar, destroying a helicopter on the site or a control room with command staff.

Conclusions


All measures proposed in the article should not only cause direct damage to the United States, but also clearly hint at “why.”

Cluster munition attacks hit American military bases - wasn’t it the United States that supplied shells and missiles with cluster warheads to Ukraine?

A transport plane was blown up with the help of MANPADS, several helicopters were destroyed by an anti-tank guided missile (ATGM), FPV drones crushed several F-35s at an air base - remember the Stingers, Javelins and Switchblade 300/600 kamikaze UAVs.

A US Navy ship was damaged or destroyed by a naval mine or BEC kamikaze - this is for the Crimean Bridge, the cruiser "Moscow" and other damaged ships of the Black Sea fleet Russian Navy.

Threatening rhetoric that does not lead to concrete actions is nothing more than an attempt to intimidate Western countries without causing them any real damage.

It's time to make sure that this doesn't work. Not at all.

Only the corpses of American soldiers, who will return home in star-striped coffins, will force the US leadership, if not to stop supporting Ukraine, then to significantly reduce the range and quantity of supplied weapons.
177 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -59
    24 October 2023 03: 53
    I suppose all this will end when the US elects a more reasonable president drinks for some reason, it is Biden and his trans retinue who are fiercely drowning for supporting the Ukrainians when they hold rallies in honor of the cessation of supplies to Ukraine fellow
    1. +55
      24 October 2023 03: 58
      Quote: Systems Generator
      I suppose all this will end when the US elects a more reasonable president

      The role of specific characters in American politics should not be overestimated. In the USA, for example, a presidential decree can be canceled by a court decision.
      1. +6
        26 October 2023 00: 26
        As I understand it, there is no longer talk of victory over Ukraine?
        Those. We can’t make it so that there is no one to supply missiles?
        1. -1
          30 October 2023 20: 45
          God forbid you defeat her! It will only get worse. We will have to fight with Poland, Romania, Moldova and Kazakhstan.
      2. -1
        18 December 2023 12: 51
        Thank you Andrey. It really hurts. It’s a pity that the ammunition is not interchangeable. Otherwise, the West would have to kill them with the same weapon.
        But who will do this?
    2. +14
      24 October 2023 05: 37
      In the USA, the same people are in power until their death. So, sometimes they share the position of president among themselves.
      1. The comment was deleted.
    3. +10
      24 October 2023 06: 16
      To prevent a major war, it is necessary to hold a small demonstration battle with the United States somewhere; only by kicking them in the butt will they calm down, as was the case in Korea and Vietnam. Well, they don’t understand drawings with red pencils.
      1. +1
        24 October 2023 16: 16
        Silver99, they are colorblind, both in politics and in military affairs. They were, are and will be.
      2. +5
        24 October 2023 22: 30
        Yes, they wrote that it seemed like some hitherto unknown “Iraqi Liberation Front” attacked a US base and poured a whole bunch of drones of an unknown breed into the sweaty American pants! The drones made a depressing impression on the inhabitants of the base and America urgently rushed to look for this very “Front”. Probably wanting to thank and reward for the thrill. But so far no one has been found.
      3. +15
        25 October 2023 02: 38
        Quote from Silver99
        To prevent a major war, it is necessary to hold a small demonstration battle with the United States somewhere; only by kicking them in the butt will they calm down, as was the case in Korea and Vietnam. Well, they don’t understand drawings with red pencils.

        Well, now there is such a front in the Northern Black Sea region. Only for now it is on him that all the red lines of colorblind people have crossed.
        And the worst thing is that we are fighting on our own - Russian Land, with our - Russian brothers, converted into previously unknown "ukrov", who, under psychotropic drugs, are driven under our shells... and our attack aircraft are under their shells... The organizers of this bestiality It’s getting more and more fun, and the world is getting closer to nuclear decoupling.
        So the author of the article is right - we need to beat the Anglo-Saxons at their overseas bases. Hit hard, constantly, with great damage, edifying and demonstrative. And put a big and thick bolt on all agreements with them. And first of all, to all the treaties (and there is only one left) on the reduction of strategic arms. The bet must be made on nuclear weapons of all types and classes in order to have a guaranteed ability to destroy the enemy and his sixes with a tenfold guarantee. So that no scenario written by the enemy would give them even a shadow of a chance to survive. You can only talk to them from a position of strength and not enter into any agreements not only on “their terms.” Only on our terms with a cast-iron-concrete guarantee of their implementation - guaranteed by our Strength.
        And do not forget about one island state, without which all this abomination would not have happened at all.
    4. +2
      24 October 2023 06: 42
      Quote: Systems Generator
      for some reason, it is Biden and his trans retinue who are fiercely drowning for the support of Ukrainians
      Because Biden Jr. (Hunter Biden), and perhaps daddy himself, invested his private money in/on. In particular, in shale gas, even before 2014, he was fortunately on the board of directors of the energy company Burisma and had access to internal information. And it just so happened that those deposits in which the youngest invested ended up mainly on the territory of the LDPR. It's a shame, right? crying
      1. -3
        24 October 2023 07: 59
        Quote: Nagan
        And it just so happened that those deposits in which the youngest invested ended up mainly on the territory of the LDPR. It's a shame, right?

        It's a shame! So much backbreaking work, and then bam and the Russians made a fuss, moving NIK "Can" away from such a feeding trough.
        We all remember the photo where NIK sat in the place of President Porokh, then he was at the pinnacle of success, and now Chumaded.
    5. +3
      24 October 2023 07: 55
      Quote: Systems Generator
      I believe all this will end when the United States elects a more reasonable president for some reason, namely Biden

      Is this a joke? The last more or less adequate US president was John Kennedy, and he was slammed by his own people.
      1. +9
        24 October 2023 12: 20
        This is the one who tried to overthrow Castro and went to Vietnam? Which one was organized by USAID? An ordinary “good policeman” who was inflated into some kind of messiah by the same democrats
        1. +6
          24 October 2023 13: 19
          Quote from alexoff
          This is the one who tried to overthrow Castro

          The whole joke is that Fidel became a communist with a pronounced anti-American position precisely because of Kennedy. If the US leadership had not rushed to Cuba by force to quickly save the money and property of respected and authoritative people, Fidel would have remained just another left-wing Latin American dictator. And the USSR would not have gotten into this mess. And in 5-10 years Fidel would have been replaced during the next putsch by someone more committed to the United States.
          And the best thing for the Yankees and Batista would be to listen to Meyer Lansky, who proposed investing part of the money from the gambling business in Cuba itself. For Meyer saw where everything was going, and he did not want to lose his business due to a social explosion.
          1. -1
            24 October 2023 15: 12
            Quote: Alexey RA
            The whole joke is that Fidel became a communist with a pronounced anti-American position precisely because of Kennedy.

            Well, even before Kennedy there were insults, like Ikey didn’t find time for him.

            What is Ikey, you say, what is he doing?
            He's not busy, but he won't accept you anymore.
      2. +2
        24 October 2023 15: 41
        No, after all, the only more or less adequate person they had was Roosevelt.
        1. 0
          24 October 2023 17: 02
          Quote: guest
          Roosevelt was more or less adequate.

          FDR? The man who became a dictator for life in America, not in Russia?

          Not everyone agrees with your understanding of adequacy.
          1. 0
            24 October 2023 17: 23
            Quote: Negro
            Quote: guest
            Roosevelt was more or less adequate.

            FDR? The man who became a dictator for life in America, not in Russia?

            Not everyone agrees with your understanding of adequacy.

            Of course not. Theodore. Theodore Roosevelt. 26th President of the United States (from 1901 to 1909).
            1. -2
              25 October 2023 19: 38
              Quote from Escariot
              Theodore. Theodore Roosevelt

              This one is certainly better (almost all are better than FDR), but in his years the United States was strongly drifting towards the imperial idea - which is also not entirely good.
          2. 0
            24 October 2023 23: 58
            The US Constitution in force at that time did not limit the number of times the same person could be elected. Only the 22nd Amendment in 1947 limited the number of terms the same person could serve to two terms.
            1. +1
              25 October 2023 19: 43
              Quote: pudelartemon
              Only the 22nd Amendment in 1947 limited the number of terms the same person could serve to two terms.

              Yes. It was just after Roosevelt that they decided that it was impossible to rely on American gentlemanliness and the authority of Washington in such a matter.

              On the other hand, to the credit of the Americans, their gentlemanliness and the authority of Washington were enough for 30 more presidents, none of whom wanted or could stay. Only the 32nd succeeded.

              For example, Deng's Chinese gentlemanliness and authority were only enough for two general secretaries. Xi is only the third and that’s it.

              Well, Yeltsin’s Russian gentlemanliness and authority were enough for...
        2. 0
          24 October 2023 23: 50
          There were two US presidents with this last name - Theodore Roosevelt and Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Who do you mean?
      3. 0
        25 October 2023 20: 24
        Quote: carpenter
        The last more or less adequate US president was John Kennedy

        Nixon was quite adequate and negotiable.
        By the way, under Yeltsin, he advised our liberals (which greatly surprised them) to be guided by the interests of the Russian Federation, and not to try to “please” our foreign “partners.”
      4. 0
        29 October 2023 11: 30
        No matter what kind of idiot is in power in the United States, the policy of their dominance in the world will not change, only the vectors for achieving it can change! It is now clear that Ukraine will not win the war with the Russian Federation, it is no longer relevant, like all of Biden’s policies, so he “hooked” on the Middle East and Israel in order to somehow get the votes of the Jewish population in the United States for his support in 2024 elections
    6. 0
      24 October 2023 08: 47
      Quote: Systems Generator
      when will the USA elect a more reasonable president?

      I wouldn't hope for THIS!!! The geldings had one more or less adequate president, so the KIA removed him!!!
    7. BAT
      +2
      24 October 2023 10: 31
      Yes, even if they elect someone, they will still give us complete crap. Be it Biden, or Trump, or Clinton, they are all tarred with the same thing. They need our resources, but they don’t need Russia. No matter how strong, no matter how weak. For them, we have always been, are and will be the most important enemy. Not China, but Russia.
    8. +4
      24 October 2023 12: 57
      Quote: Systems Generator
      a more reasonable president

      A more reasonable president will read D.A. Medvedev’s telegram and launch Tridents.
      1. +5
        24 October 2023 13: 26
        Quote: Negro
        A more reasonable president will read D.A. Medvedev’s telegram and launch Tridents.

        Having previously inquired, to what extent do the statements of the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, the First Deputy Chairman of the Military-Industrial Commission of the Russian Federation and the Actual State Advisor of the Russian Federation 1st class (civilian army general) reflect the official position of the leadership of the Russian Federation?

        He's still a more reasonable president...
        1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +5
        24 October 2023 13: 46
        A more reasonable president will read D.A. Medvedev’s telegram and launch Tridents.


        Well, my friend, you ruined it - Tridents. request Tridents are a thing of the past.

        Now for a disarming and/or decapitating strike there is:
        - F35 with nuclear weapons, which, as is known in the military district, do not fly, but destroy the Pentagon, while insidiously “do not fly into the air defense area of ​​responsibility.” This is for “targets close and with known coordinates.”
        - B2, which, as is known in the VO, do not fly, but destroy the Pentagon, while insidiously “do not fly into the air defense area of ​​responsibility.” This is for “distant targets and with unknown coordinates” with elements of “penetration lol Air defense", but the pilots have to spend their money on buying plastic bottles with a wide neck and clamshells from Walmart a little "with a file" - after all, sometimes you have to fly for more than a day.
        As Tibbetts Jr. might say soldier : “grandfather died, but the business lives on”:

        https://youtu.be/INelreLMivI

        Well, on a small note, ALCMs with nuclear weapons, which are insidiously written “as one charge” lol on B52 or B1, hehe.
        B83 - it’s not clear, maybe it’s no longer alive, so what they’ll use to “crack up the bunkers” is unclear.

        But Tridents - and the launch can be recorded, and naval peacekeepers (they refuse SLCMs with nuclear weapons, and they don’t want B61s for the fleet) can mess up. The navy doesn’t even test the “low trajectory” for Trident, it’s only Klimov/Timokhin who record this.
    9. +1
      24 October 2023 13: 14
      Quote: Systems Generator
      I suppose all this will end when the US elects a more reasonable president


      The President does not rule the United States. And we don't know the names of these people.
    10. +3
      25 October 2023 01: 20
      ... Or if a decisive president appears in Russia.
    11. 0
      3 December 2023 19: 06
      Quote: Systems Generator
      I suppose all this will end when the US elects a more reasonable president

      US policy has never changed with a change of president. It changed only due to our influence (Cubistan crisis)
  2. +12
    24 October 2023 04: 03
    Yeah, but if everything doesn’t go as the author wants, what then?
    1. +35
      24 October 2023 04: 06
      Quote from Constantin N.
      Yeah, but if everything doesn’t go as the author wants, what then?

      This is typical Mitrofanism, which has nothing to do with reality.
      1. +12
        24 October 2023 11: 19
        hi
        Yeah, but if everything doesn’t go as the author wants, what then?
        This is typical Mitrofanism, which has nothing to do with reality.

        The last person who, so to speak, shared such ideas in practice was called Osama bin Laden. Now Osama seems to be at the bottom of the ocean (but this is not certain).
        The Americans, unloved by bin Laden and Mitrofanov, on their way to the ocean funeral, spent 20 years “turning their fur inside out.”
        Considering the above, it would be nice if Mitrofanov carried out his intellectual exercises where things couldn’t get any worse - Somalia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Teply Stan. Otherwise, it’s still a pity for ordinary people, unfamiliar with Mitrofanov’s work, but forced to share the same country with him.
        1. +4
          24 October 2023 13: 00
          Quote: Wildcat
          Now Osama seems to be at the bottom of the ocean (but this is not certain).

          Who lives at the bottom of the ocean?
          SpongeBob Square Pants!
          Quote: Wildcat
          but it’s still a pity for those forced to share the same country with him.

          Not all.
      2. +2
        24 October 2023 20: 52
        I read the article... I’m wondering: has the author already been “released” or is he still in the same state when he wrote it? recourse
    2. +9
      24 October 2023 04: 27
      Quote from Constantin N.
      Yeah, but if everything doesn’t go as the author wants, what then?

      The author is one of those who threaten an adversary while sitting on the couch; it is easy to make militant statements when you are not risking anything. This behavior is very typical of adolescents and infantile people of mature age. As for reality, organizing a large-scale attack on an American military base in Qatar is extremely problematic. Moreover, despite the harsh rhetoric of the parties, further aggravation of relations with the United States is very unprofitable for our country.
      1. -2
        1 November 2023 23: 51
        "The aggravation of relations with the United States is very unprofitable for our country." - Wow, what a great conversation! Well, like at the market, PROFITABLE, NOT PROFITABLE! Pure commerce, nothing personal, but maybe wait until the cache breaks off? Then the sheer benefit will follow. What started this fuss? Due to the fact that NATO borders have moved closer to Russia and American troops have surrounded the country with their bases. In a similar situation, when Russia established a base in Cuba, America immediately issued an ultimatum, but are we weak at the knees and have no one to issue such an ultimatum to? IT'S NOT BENEFITABLE FOR SOMEONE! Businessmen!
        1. -1
          2 November 2023 00: 19
          When Russia was building a gas pipeline, the entire population, with bated breath, watched as the pipelayer was driven all the way from the Far East to the construction site. And what? A waiter was running with a tray full of dishes towards the client, and someone in the hall tripped him up. And we drew a red line again, and bashfully erased the old one, washing ourselves away. They're hammering Russian territory with cluster munitions, okay, let's wash ourselves again. Yes, maybe we will show the enemy that this territory is, as it were, not entirely Russian, but we will show concern and draw another red line. I wonder if this artist has any determination or just “concerns” in his soul?
    3. -23
      24 October 2023 05: 11
      and what will happen? The USA has never fought with a strong enemy, they will blow away not like us, they will throw Iran into the wicket, you are zombified by their mythical power)
      1. +11
        24 October 2023 11: 36
        Quote: Revan Rik
        The United States has never fought with a strong enemy


        As I understand it, the Japanese are nonsense? Just think, only a dozen aircraft carriers and battleships, several dozen cruisers and a hundred destroyers and submarines. We didn't drown such people.
        Or the Vietnamese, they are clearly weaker than the Afghans for obvious reasons?
        Or the Iraqis, who were considered one of the strongest armies in the world before Desert Storm, and then suddenly became corrupt weaklings with outdated weapons.
        1. -3
          24 October 2023 22: 31
          “I take it the Japanese are nonsense?” - for the States at that time? Actually, yes, it's nonsense. The economy and level of development of Japan could not be compared with the level of the United States. It’s like Khalkhin Gol was for the USSR, just at that time.
          I don’t even want to talk about Vietnam or Iraq; these are local conflicts for them. War is a battle of economies and that says it all. When the United States fights with someone equal in economic power, then we can talk about a strong rival.
          1. +4
            25 October 2023 11: 30
            In 41, the Japanese had the strongest fleet in the world (formally the American one was larger, but in terms of aircraft carriers and trained pilots, the Japanese were superior) because they spent almost 50% of the budget on the military. It was already during the war that he shrunk due to huge losses, but still remained a serious adversary. But the US launched massive production far from immediately. Khalkhin Gol... do you even understand that the Japanese fleet and the Japanese army are heaven and earth?

            Well, okay, but who did the USSR fight on equal terms with? Don't offer Germany. Compare how much the Allies produced during the war and how much Germany produced. The conclusion, according to your own logic, is that the Germans are nonsense, their economy cannot be compared even with the USA/USSR alone, not to mention the whole trinity. And they were also backward - no T-34, no IS-2, no B-17, no normal fleet, no assembly line production.
            1. 0
              26 October 2023 21: 44
              So I told you about this - your “best fleet in the world” and “best aces” could not do anything against the US economy. Your entire first paragraph, this is precisely what confirms that the Japanese economy is not a rival to the US economy at all.

              “Compare how much the Allies produced during the war years and how much Germany produced.” - It’s not nice to distort like that. If you take allies, then take Germany plus all of Europe and Scandinavia. Otherwise, you can pull it to the other side - the USSR alone fought against all of Europe and Scandinavia. And then he also helped the Americans with the Japanese.

              In general, you wrote something incomprehensible, contradicting yourself, but even this confirms that the main thing in war is the economy. And only a victim of the Unified State Exam can compare the economies of Japan and the United States on equal terms.
      2. +8
        24 October 2023 12: 22
        We also haven’t fought a strong enemy for a long time. The US lost battles, but they simply withdrew their troops and strangled their enemies economically
  3. +4
    24 October 2023 04: 13
    Until the Anglo-Saxons can really be pushed deep down the throats so that they not only can’t eat, but can’t even breathe, until then they will continue to crap, and, above all, on us.
    1. +6
      24 October 2023 05: 00
      Quote: Roust
      don't push it deep down your throat

      First, calibrate Rzeszow in Poland, and only then!
      1. +8
        24 October 2023 17: 26
        Quote: Uncle Lee
        Quote: Roust
        don't push it deep down your throat

        First, calibrate Rzeszow in Poland, and only then!

        Some Poles have enough strength for two combined arms armies. Does Russia have two extra combined arms armies to fight Poland?
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. +33
    24 October 2023 04: 23
    Threatening rhetoric that does not lead to concrete actions is nothing more than an attempt to intimidate Western countries without causing them any real damage.

    It's time to make sure that this doesn't work. Not at all.

    Our leadership understands perfectly well that this does not work.
    But it was not put in place on January 1, 2000 (I wonder by whom? Certainly not by me and you), in order to take specific actions that cause real damage to Western countries. The last 23 years have clearly confirmed this. If I’m wrong, let someone give an example of how, in response to the actions of the West, which harms us, our leadership would respond to it with at least corresponding damage.
    1. +7
      24 October 2023 05: 22
      Quote: Mihaylo Tishayshiy
      But that’s not why it was installed on January 1, 2000 (I wonder by whom? Certainly not by me and you),

      Otherwise you don’t know who? To those who hammered the last nail into the coffin of the USSR and reported this to the boss overseas:

      (from 13:19)
      The state has stood and will stand guard over the safety of each of our people.

      Why not a “Russian”, why not a “Russian citizen”?
      All that remains is to find out whether we are part of Putin’s circle of people?
      Maybe that’s why the oligarchs continue to rage in their revelry and desire to rip off the last shirt (“three skins”) from the Russian people?
    2. -4
      24 October 2023 16: 53
      Dedolorization comrade Ukrainian
    3. +2
      25 October 2023 00: 49
      Quote: Mihaylo Tishayshiy
      actions of the West that harm us

      Europe alone bought 300 billion cubic meters of gas per year and the same amount of oil, hundreds of billions of dollars per year. The West also invested a lot in the Russian economy from 1998-2008, then it began to decline, the amount there is close to a trillion. Even after 2014, the West, apart from decorative sanctions, did not do much harm to the Russian Federation; they even built SP2 to pump even more gas. In general, Russia could, having gas and cheap electricity locally, produce and pump hydrogen to Europe and simply get rich; no sheikhs, no one in the world has such an exclusive opportunity as Russia to produce hydrogen on a huge scale, with the same pipes as pumped gas. This is equivalent in terms of revenue if, on such a scale, finished gasoline was sent to Europe instead of crude oil. Hydrogen is an ideal energy source for cars, could replace gasoline and diesel, and is in many ways better than electric cars. Since 2022, of course, different times have come in relations, arms supplies to Ukraine and already serious sanctions. But I don’t see much harm from the West until 2022. And for this reason, the Russian authorities responded to the harm of the West by sending their children there and willingly spending their hard earned money there.
      1. 0
        26 October 2023 00: 42
        Hydrogen through steel pipes?
        It must be suicidal.
        Read about hydrogen embrittlement of steel.
        1. -1
          26 October 2023 21: 02
          Are you saying that hydrogen corrodes steel pipes? In general, I haven’t thought about this question, and that’s not the point. Laying new pipes for such a gesheft is nonsense. The main thing is that Russia is literally sitting on a golden bag; having hydroelectric power stations and natural gas, it is possible to produce hydrogen on a huge scale at record low amounts. To produce hydrogen, you need either natural gas or almost free electricity, and Russia is all cut up by rivers of the required size, and there are quite a few hydroelectric power stations, and this is environmentally friendly energy. And there's a whole lot of gas. But in Europe there is neither one nor the other, and therefore hydrogen production is expensive. Mercedes even released the E Class in the 2010s using hydrogen, and clean water drips from the exhaust. I once believed that they would agree on this someday, about 15 years ago, but they didn’t even start talking about it.
  5. +15
    24 October 2023 04: 40
    I've been talking about this for a long time, but I'm not the president. If Putin has gone limp and cannot organize this, then he needs to leave. With his soft-heartedness towards the USA and ugly England, he puts all the people of the Russian Federation at risk of destruction!!
  6. +1
    24 October 2023 04: 41
    I completely agree with the last paragraphs of the article, which speaks of our empty chatter and threats to which the West has long stopped responding. Action is definitely needed. And not necessarily with Grads or drones... Calibers can also be supplied in a container version. There will be instructors)) Moreover, the targets can be not only American bases and ships scattered around the world, but also objects located on the mainland of the United States and, especially, Britain.
    1. +3
      24 October 2023 07: 45
      Action is definitely needed

      Now the window of easy solutions has closed, in 14 it was necessary to demolish the Bandera junta, do the job, and the Kremlin people chatted and chatted on and on.
  7. +9
    24 October 2023 04: 49
    Everything is correct, but there is one nuance: the Russian leadership does not have those people who can make such decisions. And their appearance is not yet expected.
    1. +8
      24 October 2023 06: 33
      Unfortunately, this is not a nuance, but the main reason, and the leadership courageously continues to beat everyone....in a giveaway, the “peace party” is the helmsman.
  8. +3
    24 October 2023 05: 03
    Al Udeid Air Force Base in Qatar is a legitimate target for a strike

    I fully approve of supplying our medium-range missiles to freedom fighters to attack US bases around the world.
    This should be done immediately after the delivery of US missiles to the Nazis of Ukraine... nothing personal here.
    If our leadership does not want to do this, then sooner or later the Ukrainian Nazis will not strike the Kremlin with Atams missiles... then they will have fun.
    1. +13
      24 October 2023 05: 52
      I fully approve of supplying our medium-range missiles to freedom fighters to attack US bases around the world.

      Just off the top of my head, how many freedom fighters can you name? Not terrorist groups, but a separate matter, but at least more or less legitimate forces that are ready to strike the United States and its bases?
    2. +4
      24 October 2023 09: 38
      Ukronatsiks are not attacking the Kremlin with Atams missiles..

      It’s better along Rublevka, Novo-Ogarevo... but this is unlikely. As long as ordinary soldiers are being killed, it doesn’t matter, but what if these...Volodya of Kyiv is not touched...
    3. +5
      24 October 2023 09: 44
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      I fully approve of supplying our medium-range missiles to freedom fighters to attack US bases around the world.

      Does Russia have MRBMs in its arsenal? Did not know.
      In addition, Russia today has a legislative framework for export control, which also covers the issues of the missile technology control regime. The basis of this framework is the “Law on Export Control”, adopted in 1999. Additions have been introduced to the Criminal Code providing for penalties for violations of export control rules.
      1. +1
        24 October 2023 13: 27
        Quote: Bongo
        The basis of this framework is the Export Control Law, adopted in 1999.

        Well, frankly speaking, the laws are not very interesting. But the fact that all this stuff will most likely fly to Moscow is much more interesting. Freedom fighters - they are such unique guys.
      2. 0
        25 October 2023 10: 16
        Why can’t the law be repealed? When it was necessary to change the constitution, they changed it once.
        1. 0
          26 October 2023 14: 41
          Quote: Alexander Rasmukhambetov
          Why can’t the law be repealed? When it was necessary to change the constitution, they changed it once

          There is no need to cancel anything. There is no need to openly show our ears and advertise our intentions, but simply confront the adversary with an unpleasant fact...
    4. +1
      24 October 2023 13: 17
      They have already supplied tanks and airplanes to “socialist” countries. Now these remnants are going to Ukraine and, alas, not to our side.
      It’s unlikely that the situation will be different now.
      Russia does not have that many levers of pressure (except perhaps to come up with the ability to remotely turn off weapons if something suddenly goes wrong (like in Fast and Furious: Hobbs and Shaw))
  9. +1
    24 October 2023 05: 26
    Well, will you kill 1000 Americans? Will they get scared and stop sending missiles to Ukraine?
    But we will have problems, “Mom, don’t worry.” Have you ever been to a military factory? Have you seen the equipment there? Have you seen at least one Russian or Chinese machine there?
    There are a lot of adequate people in the West who help us, without them our defense industry and foreign trade will simply stop. Killing a large number of Americans or Germans will lead to catastrophic consequences.
    1. -9
      24 October 2023 06: 12
      Quote: ism_ek
      will you kill 1000 Americans? Will they get scared and stop sending missiles to Ukraine?

      You are right that American politicians and oligarchs deeply care not only about other nations, whose name and culture they don’t even want to know. They have long stopped caring about their own people. And the death of thousands of American soldiers will only make them happy, because... there is an opportunity to further increase the military budget and, accordingly, the national debt.
      Therefore, the only real opportunity to stop US aggression is a complete ban on American and European currencies in the domestic and international transactions of Russia and its allies. And also a call to all sensible people of the world to stop supplying American currency with their products and, accordingly, their aggressive policy.
      1. -2
        24 October 2023 07: 25
        Quote: Vita VKO
        a complete ban on American and European currencies in domestic and international payments in Russia and its allies.

        What does the ban on American and European currencies mean?
        This is a complete stop of our military production, a stop of all modern power plants. Yes, we won’t even be able to produce food, seeds from the EU, feed for livestock from the EU.
        Quote: Vita VKO
        And also a call to all sensible people in the world to stop supplying American currency with their products and, accordingly, their aggressive policy.

        Sensible people will not agree to this until they see how we defeat American proxies.
      2. +4
        24 October 2023 07: 41
        Vita VKO (Vitaly)

        a complete ban on American and European currencies in domestic and international payments in Russia and its allies

        Write also, you are funny. laughing
        1. -3
          24 October 2023 16: 37
          Quote: ism_ek
          Sane people won't do this until they see

          Defeat the descendants of the founders of the USA, the descendants of prostitutes, bandits, thieves, slaves and slave traders? Moreover, now this scum, at the expense of people like you, at the expense of the resources of our country, can unlimitedly print dollars and sponsor wars, genocide and terrorists around the world.
          Quote: nickname7
          Write also, you are funny.

          Together we will laugh until we cry when mercenaries and terrorists kill your relatives for dollars and euros.
          1. -1
            24 October 2023 17: 43
            What does “at the expense of people like you” mean? Do they personally deposit money into the account of the Department of Defense? Or are they buying US war bonds?

            “At the expense of our country’s resources?” Tell me, who sends them these resources? Are these not the comrades who will fight this “imperialism”?

            PS
            And to denigrate an entire nation because of a few especially gifted ones... Bad, very bad
            1. +2
              25 October 2023 15: 44
              Quote: Russian_Ninja
              And to denigrate an entire nation because of a few especially gifted

              Why do you think states need borders?
              The answer is obvious, so that with their moral and ethical principles and rights they are within its framework.
              If a country begins to impose its ethical, legal and economic rules on other countries, this is called aggression and war, psychological, economic, even genocide. I think the example of the American Indians and African peoples is more than indicative.
          2. 0
            25 October 2023 15: 48
            Quote: Vita VKO
            Let's laugh together until we cry when mercenaries and terrorists kill your relatives for dollars and euros

            Judging by the minuses, it’s simply amazing how many fans of dollars and euros there are on the patriotic site.
    2. 0
      24 October 2023 06: 13
      Well, will you kill 1000 Americans? Will they get scared and stop sending missiles to Ukraine?

      And who said that we should be the ones who kill mattress makers? There are enough characters on the planet who want to do this. We just need to help them...

      Well, maybe they won’t be scared, but they will definitely think about it... Will they have enough trousers to sit on the splits? If several points appear that they cannot help but react to. Avon Izrailovka - so far nothing serious has happened there militarily, but how the level of bouncing around Tsegabonia immediately decreased! What if a real mess starts there? What if it breaks out in a couple of other places? What will happen?

      So far, only one thing is obvious - the blatant Tolstoyanism and elfism of our leadership in terms of including a response will definitely not lead Russia to anything good..
      1. 0
        24 October 2023 22: 49
        “What if it blazes in a couple more places? What will happen?” - the same thing that already happened - the rise of the American economy. Have you forgotten World War II? And there it didn’t just blaze, it burned like in a blast furnace. No matter where it burns, the States are the only ones who can “warm themselves by the fire.” Because geographically they are located ideally - there is no one on the borders, only two more de facto “states” - Canada and Mexico. So, unlike everyone else, they don’t have to do the splits. While others are squirming around in split trousers, they are sitting comfortably in comfortable and expensive suits, on soft leather chairs.
    3. +1
      24 October 2023 09: 33
      Quote: ism_ek
      There are a lot of adequate people in the West who help us, without them our defense industry and foreign trade will simply stop.


      It’s just that while in the West they watch “football” on TV and decide which team to root for.... The Slavic population is being disposed of during hostilities, Russian cities are under fire every day, even the Kremlin has flown in... where else then ? The West raises the stakes, as well as the damage caused to Russia... but the West will not experience damage at all, only financial costs and this picture can be observed for years/decades until Russia in the current understanding disappears (the indigenous population is replaced by migrants), and that you are satisfied with this result???

      You don’t have to answer at all, who is arguing, but why then did the SVO start? If you are afraid of the consequences and reaction of the West? Here the question of the survival of Russia as a state and Russians as a nation comes up... and as for me, all means must be used for our survival, everything. In the meantime, we are slowly being cooked over a fire, like a frog in a saucepan, and the West is happy with everything.
      1. +3
        24 October 2023 13: 08
        Quote: Aleksandr21
        It’s just that while in the West they watch “football” on TV and decide which team to root for...

        Do you think only in the west?
        Quote: Aleksandr21
        Here the question of the survival of Russia as a state and Russians as a nation is at stake...

        And what happened? Why so much pathos?
        1. 0
          24 October 2023 21: 36
          Quote: Negro
          Do you think only in the west?


          Quote: Negro
          And what happened? Why so much pathos?


          What kind of manner of commenting with questions, please enlighten me?

          Based on the situation, I don’t know where you live (by nickname it could well be in America), but in the border regions of Russia it’s “hot”, people are dying... in the Northern Military District, a lot of people are also dying and the West is constantly raising the stakes, using up Russia’s resources and throwing them into a fire of wood) and in order to stop this situation you need to start responding, and seriously... and if you pretend that everything is normal, then this situation will continue for years and the result will not please many.
          1. 0
            25 October 2023 19: 54
            Quote: Aleksandr21
            To stop this situation you need to start responding, and seriously...

            Grandpa Biden seems to be hinting at who hasn't actually started yet. Your idea to raise rates seems surprisingly timely at the end of the second year of the CBO.
            Quote: Aleksandr21
            It’s just that while in the West they watch “football” on TV and decide which team to root for

            Recently, Comrade Sobyanin opened a metro station near Vnukovo airport. Luxurious station, beautifully made.

            Very fortunately, I believe that Russia is not currently waging any war. Making a model of a Tu-144 in wartime to decorate the lobby might seem inappropriate.

            So here it is. What do you think dear Muscovites want from Comrade Sobyanin? So that he would plant them all in camouflage nets? Or vice versa, so that there is no spirit of the Northern Military District in Moscow?
      2. -1
        24 October 2023 23: 00
        "Every means must be used for our survival, everything." - they are still used, 35 thousand live in Moscow. dollar!! millionaires. But for you, means of “survival” are not provided.
      3. 0
        2 November 2023 01: 21
        What if, just out of curiosity, we lowered a couple of aircraft carriers to the bottom? And then, depending on the situation, either brazenly deny it, as the Americans do themselves, or accuse them of anything absurd. Is it possible that they will declare war?
    4. +1
      24 October 2023 18: 00
      We are not going to kill Americans, others should do that with our weapons. Just like the Americans do this to us only with the wrong hands. The United States considers and will negotiate only with a real force that can cause unacceptable damage to it.
      1. 0
        2 November 2023 01: 30
        "This should be done by others with our weapons." -
        Hmmm, a purely English approach to business. A bad example is contagious. Yes, my friend, you are becoming dangerous and unprincipled.
  10. 0
    24 October 2023 05: 54
    My hedgehog and I discussed your proposals and came to the conclusion: you are absolutely right; and he, my little hedgehog, recommends attacking the AUG in the Mediterranean, you never know what Hamas Ukrainians handed over there.
  11. +2
    24 October 2023 06: 02
    What's worse, what's better?...
    What is the situation now and what are the prospects for the future?...
    What actions are necessary now, and what should not be done?...
    Our leaders are for our country, for our people, or don’t understand who?...
    Should we expect something... so fundamental from changing the upper ones in stripes that it will change everything at once or are these our illusions?...
    There are still millions of questions for which there are no simple answers, and sometimes complex ones that would be better not answered at all!
  12. +9
    24 October 2023 06: 30
    The author proposes to fight with the USA? Or does he think that someone will fight with the USA instead of Russia? Maybe Russia has its own NGOs all over the world? Maybe all the corrupt politicians are passionate about receiving their salaries in rubles and buying villas on Rublyovka?
    1. -4
      24 October 2023 07: 03
      Why fight with the USA? Did you even read the article? The author proposes to do everything exactly what the Americans are doing now in Ukraine, damage by someone else’s hands on someone else’s territory. We do not declare war on the Americans for the actions of the Ukrainians. I am all for it with both hands. And there won’t be any war, but the Americans will get a very good shortcut, they, like Pavlov’s dogs, only understand a good kick in the butt. But unfortunately, the soft-assed Kremlin management is not capable of tough and decisive actions. Not with this guide. On the screens they say one thing, but in fact they do everything possible so as not to upset their dear partners overseas. And for the sake of this, the cruiser Moscow and the Crimean bridge and Sevastopol and the Kremlin and Engels and Diaghileva will endure. And Abrams and Atakams and God knows what else
  13. -2
    24 October 2023 06: 38
    What stupidity! The USA and Small Shave will not harm Russia in the ONLY case! When will Russia threaten the territory of these Satanists! When the Satanists realize that they can die, ONLY then will the attacks on Russia stop! And today is just a holiday for them! They supply money, weapons, mercenaries, kill Russian soldiers and for this they are not threatened with ANYTHING! Why do they need to stop this? I don't understand.
    1. -4
      24 October 2023 07: 28
      When the Satanists realize that they can die, ONLY then will the attacks on Russia stop!

      This statement is controversial, but the captain of the Walrus believed that only the dead do not bite.
  14. -3
    24 October 2023 06: 42
    There is no doubt that demonstrative military actions against those who actively support Ukraine are necessary. In relation to the United States, it is indeed possible to use our own or more or less friendly proxy states to strike their bases. But how can you influence Britain, Germany, France, Poland...? Only by the destruction of their military advisers and instructors on the territory of Ukraine. But action is necessary in any case.
    1. +4
      24 October 2023 07: 28
      In relation to the United States, it is indeed possible to use our own or more or less friendly proxy states to strike their bases.

      And who are these friendly states that are ready to attack the USA?
      By the way, how do you understand the proxy state in your context?
      1. -6
        24 October 2023 09: 02
        Iranian "Heisball", for example, and other groups.
        By the way, how do you understand the proxy state in your context?
        You read carefully - not a proxy state, but your own proxies or from a more or less friendly state. In this region it is Iran.
        1. +1
          24 October 2023 12: 32
          A proxy is an intermediary, so I did not understand the use of this word.
          And Hezbollah is ready to fight the US?
          Moreover, she is not independent in her actions.
          Iran can also be ignored; it has a “don’t touch us and we won’t touch you” policy; it has enough problems of its own.
          Who else?
  15. 0
    24 October 2023 06: 45
    Everything stated in this article is quite possible and realistic. But, with one big “BUT”, for this it is necessary that the “leadership” finally accepts as a given that no one will leave us alone, that there is a war going on, a real one, a war between Western civilization and our RUSSIAN civilization. - meat and blood of the same RUSSIANS. As this resource is depleted, other forces and means will be used. In the West, and in the near future, we will not have friends and partners. That any of our reasonable, peaceful actions and restraint will be regarded as weakness and cowardice. Or, as a betrayal of one’s interests, with all the ensuing consequences.
  16. +8
    24 October 2023 06: 57
    The United States will supply Ukraine with weapons until we strike their foreign military bases


    If the author is so “cool” and knows that we have the opportunity to “strike foreign bases”, you can ask him to answer one question: “why hasn’t Avdiivka been liberated yet”?
  17. +4
    24 October 2023 07: 36
    Why is the author embarrassed to call a spade a spade “perhaps the United States is transmitting intelligence data in real time...” - don’t doubt it, they are transmitting it.
    The United States has officially called Russia its enemy, but we are still “embarrassed” to define the United States and NATO... or are we afraid?!
    1. -1
      24 October 2023 08: 18
      Apparently some of the Kremlin or their leaders are held tightly by the balls, so that they cannot even decide on the enemy.
  18. +2
    24 October 2023 07: 36
    Maybe, for starters, we should build a refinery in Kremenchug, and then dream about bases?
  19. +10
    24 October 2023 07: 38
    Microphones in your repertoire, fantasies, either demolishing Snake Island with a tsunami or exploding nuclear weapons at a training ground for intimidation, funny. The problem is that the Russian Federation is a rather frail third world country, built as a raw material appendage to NATO countries, and its elite keeps money abroad and is afraid of the money being seized, so they would rather drop a bomb on Voronezh than on London.
    The Russian Federation has neither the strength nor the spirit of the Kremlin forces to attack the West.
    And most importantly, if the states find out who hit the base, they will strike back, and then World War 3 will begin.
    The only way was to blow up the underwater pipelines and cables of the Anglo-Saxons, but again there was little spirit and the technical capabilities were weak. It was necessary to invest money not in parades and yachts, but in technology.
    1. -2
      24 October 2023 18: 06
      Quote: nickname7
      Microphones in your repertoire, fantasies, either demolishing Snake Island with a tsunami or exploding nuclear weapons at a training ground for intimidation, funny. The problem is that the Russian Federation is a rather frail third world country, built as a raw material appendage to NATO countries, and its elite keeps money abroad and is afraid of the money being seized, so they would rather drop a bomb on Voronezh than on London.
      The Russian Federation has neither the strength nor the spirit of the Kremlin forces to attack the West.
      And most importantly, if the states find out who hit the base, they will strike back, and then World War 3 will begin.
      The only way was to blow up the underwater pipelines and cables of the Anglo-Saxons, but again there was little spirit and the technical capabilities were weak. It was necessary to invest money not in parades and yachts, but in technology.

      Because people continue to brainwash themselves with some kind of “ideologies” and other LGBT things.
      Never grasped the obvious. This entire capitalist planet with separate gangs in separately fenced areas in constant squabbles for food supply.
      Starting with the same blacks who threw paddling pools for money.
  20. 0
    24 October 2023 08: 16
    The idea is correct, but none of this will happen.
    What is needed is political will, which the Kremlin does not have and is unlikely to have.
  21. +5
    24 October 2023 08: 17
    The author of the article proposes to engage in terrorism? Instead of a military victory over Ukraine, organize terrorist attacks in third countries.
    1. +1
      24 October 2023 11: 36
      On terror, terror. Not with our hands, but with the hands of the enemies of amers around the world. The enemies of our enemy are our friends, at least temporarily. They are the weapon of the shavar, we are their enemy.
      1. 0
        24 October 2023 13: 30
        Do any countries have so many of these “enemies”? Perhaps those whom we consider enemies are just opponents or simply want good for themselves (remove the United States from their land, but are not averse to trading and cooperating with them)?

        PS
        And hostility is a selective concept. Our enemy would be more likely to be called the USA, Britain or Poland than, for example, Germany, with which we fought very hard (World War 1 and World War 2 would suffice).
        What I mean is that it will be difficult for us to find “allies”, even if the USA once brought grief to these countries
  22. -3
    24 October 2023 09: 39
    It's high time to hunt the Americans and their henchmen and.... DEATH them!
  23. -3
    24 October 2023 10: 20
    Quote: Arkadich
    Just off the top of my head, how many freedom fighters can you name? Not terrorist groups, but a separate matter, but at least more or less legitimate forces that are ready to strike the United States and its bases?

    Who is legitimate and who is a terrorist in your opinion? Is the Kyiv junta legitimate? Is the Kosovo Liberation Army legitimate? Al Qaeda was legitimate against the USSR and “turned” into terrorism against the USA. Hamas was beaten by “freedom fighters” against Assad, but suddenly they became “terrorists” against Israel.
    It is necessary to use the Euro-Atlantic definition - a terrorist who attacks our enemies becomes a legitimate “freedom fighter,” and freedom fighters against us are always “terrorists.”
    1. +2
      24 October 2023 11: 41
      Are you offering to sponsor terrorists? According to this logic, it was necessary to slaughter all the Germans after the victory - “if they can do it, then we can too.” He who kills a dragon will become a dragon himself.
  24. +8
    24 October 2023 10: 24
    Practice shows that considering the enemy weak and cowardly is not a good idea. For some reason, after the corpses of American soldiers in Korea, the United States did not get scared and did not leave Korea. They left Vietnam only many years later. By the way, the Japanese were sure that the pampered amers did not know how and did not want to fight, and after the first serious losses they would get scared and capitulate, or they would be easily defeated, because they were cowardly traders and not warriors... Sound familiar?
  25. BAI
    -4
    24 October 2023 10: 36
    We need to hit the base in Rzeszow. And we will see whether the United States will officially start a war over the Poles or not.
    We have nothing to lose - the war with NATO is already underway, only unofficially
    1. +1
      24 October 2023 15: 22
      Well then, we’ll start fighting directly with NATO. Do you even know the approximate numbers of combat fighters they have and ours? Google it and you will be surprised. That's why GDP maneuvers. There are no simple solutions.
    2. +5
      24 October 2023 17: 36
      Quote: BAI
      We need to hit the base in Rzeszow. And we will see whether the United States will officially start a war over the Poles or not.
      We have nothing to lose - the war with NATO is already underway, only unofficially

      Well, let’s say in the world of pink ponies the USA and NATO do not stand up for Poland, OK. However, Poland now has enough strength for two combined arms armies. Does Russia have two extra combined arms armies to fight Poland?
  26. -1
    24 October 2023 11: 12
    Empty.
    We are already allies of Damascus, we supply a lot of things, but... he doesn’t hit the bases.
    Some "rebels" are attacking the bases. Will we supply the rebels without the official authorities?
    The real thing is difficult - they will definitely highlight it. Here, the Chinese rebels apparently got hold of UAVs, but ours... will be overrun.

    And what is this about each author drawing his own “red lines” at will? Even Putin seemed to have only one red line (the media remembered once). But neither cassettes nor many others are prohibited. Officially supply to official governments... It is possible at will.
    The government can go to Syria, for example. Rebels of all kinds are not allowed.
  27. +2
    24 October 2023 11: 29
    Here we sent the manure workers to Turkey, and not in body bags, but alive and well with iPhones, and the author dreams about the corpses of American soldiers - “Fantasy, you called me!” (c).
  28. -1
    24 October 2023 11: 38
    Quote: Kmon
    Practice shows that considering the enemy weak and cowardly is not a good idea. For some reason, after the corpses of American soldiers in Korea, the United States did not get scared and did not leave Korea. They left Vietnam only many years later. By the way, the Japanese were sure that the pampered amers did not know how and did not want to fight, and after the first serious losses they would get scared and capitulate, or they would be easily defeated, because they were cowardly traders and not warriors... Sound familiar?

    1. Against Japan, without the Chinese and Russians, the United States had no chance of winning.
    2. In Korea and Vietnam, it was mainly South Koreans and South Vietnamese who died, but despite this, the United States fled from the battlefield.
    Moreover, the Americans know how to fight and are not cowardly. They will defend their homeland no worse than the Russians. But it is very difficult to fight and die several thousand kilometers from your homeland, in someone else’s war.
    1. +10
      24 October 2023 11: 48
      Hmm, it’s very interesting how many Japanese ships were sunk by the Chinese and Russians, and how Japan would win in a naval war an enemy capable of riveting at an aircraft carrier every three days. And after the destruction of the fleet, the Japanese can sit in Manchuria as long as they want - this will in no way prevent the metropolis from starving to death under the conditions of a dense blockade and bombing. Well, or capitulate after nuclear strikes, as in reality.

      Did the US flee Korea? This is news, but I thought the North Koreans were defeated, but the Chinese only managed to achieve a draw. Well, I repeat - the Amers’ losses in both wars were orders of magnitude higher than what we can now do through a proxy, and yet they did not leave Korea, and left Vietnam only ten years later, despite the losses.

      That's right, you speak almost like the Japanese. “The Americans do not have the samurai spirit, this nation of traders will sign peace very quickly, you just need to break their spirit with the first blow.” The American continent was not threatened by anything; it is strange that they did not capitulate, but for some reason fought thousands of kilometers from their homeland, despite hundreds of thousands of losses. How is an American base abroad fundamentally different from Pearl Harbor? Hawaii didn't even become a state until 1959.
  29. +1
    24 October 2023 11: 42
    The same thing will happen under any US president.
  30. 0
    24 October 2023 11: 56
    In addition, despite the harsh rhetoric of the parties, further aggravation of relations with the United States is extremely unprofitable for our country.


    Wrong! They must make the situation “unprofitable” for the West. Today's business model - killing Russians by Russians - is extremely profitable. And cheaply, too, since all Ukrainian resources go into the hands of American investors - including a huge army of surrogate mothers and a supply of “voluntary organ donors.”

    And no, NOT by proxy, not somewhere abroad, and the damage is not too small - but too small for direct nuclear war.

    Here in Germany you can read it in the newspapers or hear it on television - the Russians still didn't flinch when we crossed the red line - so they won't continue.
  31. +10
    24 October 2023 12: 44
    Just by the title it became clear who the author was. Another portion of Mitrofanovism - senseless and merciless, designed exclusively for LUMPEN - ohlos.
    To be honest, a self-respecting resource does not publish such information substance even in “Opinions”.
  32. +2
    24 October 2023 12: 45
    Today the Ukrainian Armed Forces hit an airfield, tomorrow they hit ammunition depots or military bases, and then missiles will fly across our cities,
    It is impossible to protect yourself from this 100%

    I think this is exactly how those shoulder straps responsible for the traffic around the Aerodrome were justified. They themselves did nothing to protect themselves, but the Americans are to blame for everything!!!!
  33. +4
    24 October 2023 13: 06
    The temperature of the water in the pan is getting higher and higher, but the frog is still comfortable.
  34. +8
    24 October 2023 13: 20
    Andrei Mitrofanov became agitated. And why? Because of Ryabov. Where is the article “ATAKMS little too late is useless”, how long can you wait? Here people are worried that at any moment America will be bombed!
  35. -4
    24 October 2023 14: 30
    Absolutely right. The problem is different: Who will shoot at the bases of NATO countries? 404 of their weapons are shooting at us, and for this we are killing 404. We need to create rebel units (formally not under the control of either the SAR or 404) and transfer them weapons and control centers (this can be done legally).
    Otherwise, NATO will hit us with officially conventional weapons. And NATO has more of it than we do (and carriers too)
    1. +3
      24 October 2023 18: 28
      Quote: Zaurbek
      Absolutely right. The problem is different: Who will shoot at the bases of NATO countries? 404 of their weapons are shooting at us, and for this we are killing 404. We need to create rebel units (formally not under the control of either the SAR or 404) and transfer them weapons and control centers (this can be done legally).
      Otherwise, NATO will hit us with officially conventional weapons. And NATO has more of it than we do (and carriers too)

      "We need to create rebel units"

      Those “rebels” already have more pensions than our Uralvagonzavod workers’ salaries.
      Why should they rebel there? winked
  36. -3
    24 October 2023 14: 52
    The idea is of course a sensible one, but we need to think it through carefully and take everything into account.
  37. -3
    24 October 2023 16: 00
    It’s high time to start using the enemy’s tactics against himself. this is the “rial politician”. They won't understand otherwise. THEY ARE COMFORTABLE BECAUSE OF THE OCEAN WATCHING THE FIRE HERE

    Ukrainians have adopted all the nastiness of ISIS and Anglo-Saxon and use it wherever possible, very capable students from their teachers
  38. -1
    24 October 2023 17: 11
    The author was given these bases... Critical infrastructure in which billions have been invested, that is what should be the goal. Look how the West didn’t like it when the Estonian-Finnish gas pipeline in the Baltic was damaged (and ended in water). I have already written more than once that there is also a European underwater tunnel between Britain and France, since it is 5 times more expensive than the Crimean Bridge. Why not make it so that the Britons with the paddling pools themselves drive the Sumerians away from the Crimean Bridge. But this right is already aerobatics, what am I talking about...
  39. -2
    24 October 2023 17: 22
    Our Duma members don't have enough eggs
  40. +3
    24 October 2023 17: 58
    How much do these expert journalists drink before writing such nonsense?
  41. -1
    24 October 2023 18: 26
    The Kremlin has little guts...
    he is not even capable of hitting the ukra...
  42. +1
    24 October 2023 19: 38
    The end of the SVO operation is not yet visible, and no matter how much we “puff up”, we are judged not by words, but by deeds! Those same Arabs didn’t seem to be beating their “fists” on their chests, but against Israel there were only angry threats! That Americans, Europeans and others respect a strong “fist” in front of their noses! No other way! laughing
  43. 0
    24 October 2023 19: 40
    Well, this requires political will. Well, what kind of will can a cowardly president have, who has drawn red lines across the entire country.
  44. +1
    24 October 2023 19: 48
    https://t.me/ramzayiegokomanda/5253
    On the attack of the airfield in Berdyansk.
    We just never get tired of jumping on the same rake. Deep rear, relaxation, “maybe it will blow through.” Receive and sign!
    We have been fighting for a year and a half. Where are the protective structures for airfields? Where are the usual gabions that perfectly protect aircraft from both shock waves and fragments? Where are the anti-drone networks? Where is the rise into the sky when there is a threat of a missile strike (which, by the way, the Ukrainian Armed Forces do very well)? Where are the radar surveillance balloons?
    If we recalculate the cost of all our planes and helicopters destroyed on the ground by drones, saboteurs and missile attacks, then this money would be enough to build arched concrete shelters at all airfields used in the Northern Military District. But no! We prefer flat tires and the belief that “the Ukrainian is stupid and won’t be able to!”
  45. +3
    24 October 2023 19: 51
    Al Udeid Air Force Base in Qatar is a legitimate target for a strike

    All that remains is to direct the fighters against American imperialism in the “right direction” and provide them with suitable tools.

    As is often the case with the author, his proposals are striking in their scale and so complete and ignoring realism and, in fact, the consequences for ourselves.
    But for the jingoistic patriots it will do just fine, it will warm the soul so to speak... winked
    Only the corpses of American soldiers, who will return home in star-striped coffins, will force the US leadership, if not to stop supporting Ukraine, then to significantly reduce the range and quantity of supplied weapons.
    I'm afraid the effect may be the opposite of what was expected. I wouldn’t want to multiply mistakes and go through the rake...
  46. -3
    24 October 2023 19: 53
    until we hit their foreign military bases

    Cossack women sent to the Kremlin. The hand will not rise to do anything against the overseas owner.
  47. -2
    24 October 2023 19: 55
    The Kremlin is a slow-witted and indecisive Supreme Commander.

    In fact, the main armament for the Ukrainian Wehrmacht has three transitions and one of them is a railway. node st. Private security company in Western Ukraine. There, Western cars with large and heavy equipment from the narrow European gauge are switched to the wide gauge and then transported to the desired point.

    What's stopping you from demolishing this node, turning it into a big funnel?

    What is stopping you from demolishing the Black Sea ports of the Ukrainian Reich?

    All this is within the reach of the Sarmatians and Bulava, if the Anglo-Saxons do not react to our Daggers.

    What's stopping you from dropping several satellites and MQ-9 Reaper, carrying out reconnaissance and targeting of Russian targets?

    But the lack of political will prevents the military from giving the order to the Russian army to destroy the arrogant Saxons.

    We are waiting for it to arrive in Voronezh and Rostov.
    1. -1
      24 October 2023 20: 31
      Quote: Factor
      railway node st. Private security company in Western Ukraine. There, Western cars with large and heavy equipment from the narrow European gauge are switched to the wide gauge and then transported to the desired point. What's stopping you from demolishing this node, turning it into a big funnel?

      Dduzhische, they have already written more than once: the points for rearranging trolleys have long been moved to the territory of the European Union countries, “our” broad gauge has been extended there. Do you want to go to war with NATO? Nu-nu.

      Quote: Factor
      "Sarmatians" and "Bulava"

      Duzhische, without warning (issued much in advance) a ballistic missile launched is a very valid reason for a retaliatory missile attack. No one will figure out what kind of rocket it is, what it is equipped with and where it is flying.

      Ninada stop

      Quote: Factor
      We are waiting for it to arrive in Voronezh and Rostov

      It looks like another fighter-provocateur has appeared at VO. Oh well. Let's see what kind of factor this is... just a little wink laughing
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
  48. -1
    24 October 2023 20: 11
    America supplies the Ukrainian fascists with weapons to kill Russian people, so why is Russia afraid to supply the Syrians with powerful weapons to destroy the Americans in the occupied territories in Syria and stealing their resources!?
    1. +1
      24 October 2023 21: 38
      Quote: Berg Berg
      America supplies the Ukrainian fascists with weapons to kill Russian people, so why is Russia afraid to supply the Syrians with powerful weapons to destroy the Americans in the occupied territories in Syria and stealing their resources!?

      Because Syria already has weapons capable of attacking US bases, but stubbornly does not use them.
  49. +1
    24 October 2023 20: 35
    Russia does not have the resources to fight with the USA and NATO, but it probably has the resource to restrain it, which is why these red lines exist. Russia also needs time to rebuild its economy and army to suit existing realities.
    1. +2
      24 October 2023 21: 37
      Quote: Alexey Malashenko
      Russia does not have the resources to fight with the USA and NATO, but it probably has the resource to restrain it, which is why these red lines exist. Russia also needs time to rebuild its economy and army to suit existing realities.

      Here it is rather necessary to realign appetites to the realities of the economy and the army.
  50. -4
    24 October 2023 21: 48
    Absolutely right. Those who want to get even with the USA are a dime a dozen... Stop chewing our snot. And appeal to their conscience. It's time to cause such damage that they forget the road in the direction of Ukraine
  51. +4
    24 October 2023 22: 38
    "The United States will supply Ukraine with weapons until we strike their foreign military bases" -
    This should not be done under any circumstances. The US will view this as an attack on their country, which will lead to a nuclear strike on Russia. We are already on the threshold of the Third World War.
    1. -1
      27 October 2023 10: 58
      This should have been done during the first delivery of weapons to the Ukrainians. Iran is frying the Americans with UAVs just on the way and there is no nuclear strike on Iran. Someone's just afraid
  52. -2
    24 October 2023 22: 52
    If there were data about transport and the route such that it could be hit along the way, it would be possible to hit. Even necessary.
  53. 0
    24 October 2023 22: 54
    I hope our people won’t do such a stupid thing as a direct attack on American bases. The United States now desperately needs an obvious external enemy, like Japan in WWII, in order to consolidate its torn society and justify the necessary default, like a bleed from the nose. No, there is no need to interfere with their natural decomposition. But through third proxies we need to hit all the pain points, but in such a way that in no case our ears are visible.
  54. 0
    25 October 2023 00: 15
    Until we return flight missions to Washington as they were before 1994!
  55. The comment was deleted.
  56. -2
    25 October 2023 09: 17
    The United States will supply Ukraine with weapons until we strike their foreign military bases


    It’s good that this sad truth is finally dawning on the public.
    Amers will deliver in any case. Except one.
    Complete seizure of the territory of Ukraine and the liquidation of this pseudo-state. And to do this, you just need to declare mobilization, train and arm several million fighters.
    1. +1
      27 October 2023 07: 38
      I suggest you volunteer
  57. +1
    25 October 2023 11: 00
    Everything is much simpler! We must completely block the borders of Ukraine! From the word, even a mosquito wouldn’t fly by!
  58. +1
    25 October 2023 15: 09
    A call to unleash World War 3?
  59. pop
    0
    25 October 2023 15: 10
    The US will supply Ukraine with weapons until we destroy the bridges across the Dnieper
  60. -1
    25 October 2023 19: 14
    Everything is going as usual. The process has started.

    In Russia, under the leadership of President Vladimir Putin conducted nuclear deterrence training, the Kremlin press service reported.

    «During the training, practical launches of ballistic and cruise missiles took place", - the message says.

    The training involves practicing the tasks of delivering a “massive nuclear strike by strategic offensive forces in response to an enemy nuclear strike,” said Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu.

    Read more at RBC:
    https://www.rbc.ru/politics/25/10/2023/653937de9a794747f1b535b5?from=from_main_1
  61. 0
    25 October 2023 19: 24
    Well, why immediately the USA, and not Poland and Romania. In return for our planes, it was possible to sink an American aircraft, for example, an aircraft carrier
  62. 0
    25 October 2023 19: 34
    Quote: Systems Generator
    I suppose all this will end when the US elects a more reasonable president

    They had already chosen him, so they shot him.
  63. The comment was deleted.
  64. 0
    25 October 2023 21: 17
    I completely agree with the author.
  65. 0
    25 October 2023 21: 22
    Awesome author. So he will agree on an article about extremism and terrorism, together with the dear editors
  66. The comment was deleted.
  67. The comment was deleted.
  68. 0
    26 October 2023 12: 29
    Most likely, the supply of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) - kamikazes of the Lancet type - is an excessive measure - it is not enough on its own
    But I wouldn't say that. Recently their use has decreased. The enemy became much more careful.
  69. 0
    26 October 2023 23: 53
    Threatening rhetoric that does not lead to concrete actions is nothing more than an attempt to intimidate Western countries without causing them any real damage.

    It's time to make sure that this doesn't work. Not at all.

    Only the corpses of American soldiers, who will return home in star-striped coffins, will force the US leadership, if not to stop supporting Ukraine, then to significantly reduce the range and quantity of supplied weapons.

    Andrey I completely share your point of view. It's time to move away from our notorious Laureliness and replace it with LOUDITY!
  70. 0
    27 October 2023 07: 36
    We will not hit their foreign bases. That's where our bosses keep their money
  71. -1
    27 October 2023 10: 57
    To strike at US military bases you need honor, dignity and courage. There are already a million reasons. We could start with military bases on Syrian territory, they are illegal, the situation is absolutely identical to a ruin. We give Daiask 10 Iskanders and they fly to the Yankees. You can attack Ramshiain in Germany. At the first delivery of weapons to the ruin. But, again, it takes courage. Who should give tactful orders?
  72. 0
    27 October 2023 16: 14
    If they set up their bases everywhere, it means that the leadership of these countries allowed them to do this. As "BROTHER 2" said - and I will buy them all.
  73. The comment was deleted.
  74. 0
    27 October 2023 18: 05
    In order to do something you need technology.
    Bribery technologies
    Technologies of persuasion
    Hidden logistics technologies
    Privacy technologies
    Educational technologies
    Application technologies

    Experience all of this together and separately.

    It seems to me that our state does not have this experience or technology. According to our firmware, we hit everything head-on and still carry out frontal attacks.
    What are proxy attacks? :)
    What if it opens?
    We need to finish this in Ukraine by military means, then we won’t have to dig into any bases anywhere. Otherwise, we can’t solve it right next door, and the author proposes to break more wood at several points.
  75. The comment was deleted.
  76. 0
    27 October 2023 20: 32
    Justified and logical. The only thing missing is the illustration of the trembling German Chancellor and Co. on the concrete of the Israeli airport during rocket fire
  77. The comment was deleted.
  78. 0
    28 October 2023 15: 07
    Only the corpses of American soldiers, who will return home in star-striped coffins, will force the US leadership, if not to stop supporting Ukraine, then to significantly reduce the range and quantity of supplied weapons.

    It's right. But in addition to this, reduce the range and quantity of weapons supplied to Bandera, [b]or even just stop these deliveries [/b]It would have long been possible by destroying the very possibility for the West to import these weapons and ammunition. To do this, it is necessary to destroy all the “entrance gates” on the Ukrainian border through which all this is imported: transport infrastructure, its facilities, railways. dor. tracks, bridges, business, rolling stock
    etc., which has already been repeatedly proposed as the most obvious and effective, in the opinion of the military, in countering all these deliveries instead of the “grinding” of Western equipment, a “legitimate target” by our armed forces on the LBS, which sounds pleasant to some, in which we inevitably lose our own. But, unfortunately, what is called “things are still there”! I assume that the interests of business, which needs all this infrastructure, are interfering in solving this problem...
  79. -1
    28 October 2023 16: 20
    Atamak has a cluster warhead and this is a violation of agreements on the non-use of cluster munitions. In fact, America produces them. It’s time for Russia to produce something with a cluster warhead. Now only nuclear weapons are not used. It is not clear why our center is slow to make decisions. Ukraine is making full use of cluster munitions
    We need to think about the effectiveness of what we use in warehouses, and the weapons that we stored were enough for a year of war with Ukraine. And we take Ukraine, they had no problems with weapons
    The United States needs wars because their corporations make money from it. Their politicians support wars.
    America doesn’t care who to support, the most important thing is that these are wars against their main enemies. i.e. us
    The USSR kept an army of 5 million people and this deterred any wars
    You will also note that when the war began, we barely collected 300 thousand for the war with Ukraine, although we have an army of 2 million people
    Maybe we should somehow keep other calculations of the army, how many we have ready and combat-ready? and not a recount of all management personnel
    Another question: maybe this war shouldn’t have started in 2022
    Before the war, it is necessary to check whether production is ready, in particular the production of shells that we have run out of
  80. 0
    28 October 2023 20: 43
    I'm more interested in why wave emitters are not used in the rear - there are no samples of Atakms missiles?
  81. 0
    28 October 2023 22: 49
    All this will end when the States end. And it seems there is no other way. But it's their choice.
  82. -1
    28 October 2023 23: 40
    If you strike at US bases, they will not only not stop supplying weapons to Ukraine, but they themselves will begin to attack targets in the Russian Federation throughout the entire depth of the territory.
  83. 0
    30 October 2023 17: 59
    The United States does not attack itself, it acts at the expense of others. USA is a terrorist country
    The United States will only dictate its own rules for supplied weapons. They are not interested in the opinions of people who wants to live and with whom. The example of their policy in Afghanistan did not lead to anything; they supported the minority there
  84. 0
    31 October 2023 17: 56
    Let the author of this article talk about the consequences of striking US military targets, why write all this nonsense and puff out your cheeks. The USSR is a great power and it tried not to bully the Americans for various reasons. And then suddenly great Russia will now begin to fight with America. We For great happiness, Ukraine would be defeated somehow. Again, thanks to the great Russian man and his titanic patience with our wise strategists.
  85. 0
    1 November 2023 11: 58
    It's time to supply container yachts to the Houthis))))
  86. 0
    2 November 2023 16: 51
    Crush the imperialists into dust, all over the world, so that the earth burns under the mercenaries of the Pentagon!
  87. 0
    3 February 2024 02: 34
    This is not our method, our method is International Law, which only we comply with. Pu himself said that we will not impose sanctions without the UN Security Council, we will not bomb the infrastructure because this is ours, not a war. For the Nord Streams he only mumbled and, but for the downed plane the Duma again sent some kind of paper to the US Congress, like let them know! Wow, this isn't even funny anymore.
    Therefore, all sorts of Euro snoops and other Nuland, in a calm flow of tourists, go to the station in Kyiv and walk around our land as if it were their own. And in theory, they should start chewing their tie right on the platform, to the sound of sirens and cluster munitions scattering. But no, we are not like that - we are waiting for the tram.
    I’m already silent about bridges, concrete plants, etc. on the list. Odessa alone is worth something, which no one bombed for more than a year and through which everything flowed in a stream due to the grain conspiracy.
    Everything has been said more than once.