Why do the Chinese need the Su-57?

135
Why do the Chinese need the Su-57?

China really wants to be a country - an example for everyone. Strong, stable and respected. And quite a bit is missing for this: an army, fleet and industry. And in all three areas, the Chinese work as befits communists. That is, for a breakthrough.

Of course, after China showed its attitude towards Western-style democracy, that is, in 1989 in Tiananmen Square, the West was not at all eager to share with the PRC not only military technologies; dual-use technologies were also banned. In general, the screws are tightened to the fullest, but China, led by the leader, does not give up and continues to work in the field of inventing new useful technologies and scientific developments.



Or, as everyone knows, it obtains technology by all available means, without suffering at all from conscience when choosing methods.

Today, in continuation of the previous topic of fifth-generation engines, we will talk about the fact that the Chinese are very interested in our developments in the field of fifth-generation aircraft. And to be precise, these are the engines for these aircraft.

Stop. The PLA has fifth-generation aircraft, you say. Chengdu J-20.


Yes, the plane is really not bad, it has decent potential, but... It does not have the engine of tomorrow.

If you remember, the first copies of the Chengdu J-20 flew on Russian AL-31FN. Then it seems (not confirmed by our side) they were replaced by AL-31F-M2. After 2016, the Chinese actively hunted and happily bought decommissioned engines of these models.

Next came the WS-10S, which was very similar to the AL-31, but had a little more power - 142 kN versus 137 kN. On these engines, China began using its own turbine blades made from rhenium-nickel superalloys in 2017. The step, of course, is impressive, but the overhaul interval was only 500 hours, which, in comparison with Russian and American engines, for which this figure is three times larger, does not look at all.

By 2023, the WS-15 engine with controlled thrust vectoring and a power of 181 kN in afterburner was supposed to begin service. However, there were delays with the engine and flights, if there were any, were not advertised.

Therefore, many countries in the region and those who do not have the budget for American or Russian aircraft are considering proposals from the PRC. And some people buy Chinese planes because they are really quite good cars. Except for engines. For example, some time ago Indonesia seriously looked at Chinese aircraft, but in the end it preferred the Su-30MK2. Precisely because of the engines, because China was unable to fulfill the conditions, which were to supply its own aircraft, with its own avionics, but Russian engines.

So Russian turbojet engines are indeed a sphere of interest for China. At least until they master the production of equally reliable and powerful engines.

As already mentioned, the development of modern aviation - This is primarily the development of engines. The engine not only lifts the plane off the ground and accelerates it, but now also sets the direction of flight, provides the systems with electricity and hydraulic fluid under a certain pressure.

Therefore, if we are talking seriously about the development of aviation, we must understand that without the development of engines it is simply impossible. This is well understood in China too. But there is a difficult situation there today: on the one hand, research institutes and design bureaus are working on new models, on the other, industry cannot keep up with them. Much has been said about the shortage of rare earth metals and China's lack of qualified alloy development specialists.


And the factories themselves are not very beautiful. The aviation industry is served by the Shanghai and Anshan metallurgical plants, which are capable of supplying the necessary alloys. However, when it comes to tiny quantities for the same blades, it would be more appropriate to use small private enterprises, but this option does not suit the advocates of secrecy in the industry leadership.

Today, Chinese engineers are trying to solve their engine problems with the help of an old ally, titanium. However, titanium, due to its temperature capabilities, does not allow a significant increase in the temperature of the mixture in front of the gas generator. It might be possible to use a solution such as spraying ceramic materials onto the blades of a high-pressure compressor and then baking them, but Chinese engineers have not achieved significant success in this area either. And a ceramic coating of titanium blades could raise the temperature at the HPC inlet by about 100-150K.

Another solution is to create a titanium-rhenium alloy. Rhenium is a very refractory material that could provide t=1 – 900 K before high-pressure testing. Why rhenium and not, say, tungsten? It’s just that in Hengxi province, not far from the city of Xi’an, where a number of aircraft manufacturing enterprises are located, a large rhenium deposit was recently discovered.

As our neighbors say, “We have what we have.” Therefore, Chinese engineers have a lot of work ahead of them to create new light alloys that are not afraid of high temperatures.

Another thing that the Chinese would gladly borrow in any way. They really need a new ignition system for engines, which would ensure that the engine starts during flight, and would also save engineers from such a thing as burning excess fuel in a chamber with an explosion effect.

In general, plasma ignition of the Russian AL-41F1 would be very useful.


Maybe together?

The Chinese media reported that NPO Saturn and UMPO (Ufa Engine Production Association), which are working on a fifth-generation engine under the designation Product-30, are experiencing significant financial difficulties. Naturally, in general this also applies to UAC, as the head office of the Russian aviation industry.

The evidentiary argument is as follows: the Chinese have information that the pre-production version of Product 30 is already flying on the T-50-7 laboratory aircraft. In total, a preliminary series of 10 pieces was produced for testing. For comparison, testing the AL-31 engine took 68 engines. If UMPO and Saturn do not produce a series of engines for testing that are at least approximately similar to their predecessors, then Russian aircraft manufacturers have problems.

This is an interesting remark, which is not worth commenting on yet. It has a right to life, but other explanations can be given for such an approach as the production of a small series of engines for testing.

In general, Chinese engineers are familiar with the series of these engines.
AL-31F – mounted on the Su-30MKK.
AL-41F1S - on the Su-35SK.


Both fighters have long been in service with the PLA Air Force (especially the Su-30MKK) and naturally, engines for them were purchased under separate contracts to replace those that had expired.

Naturally, Chinese specialists carried out incomplete disassembly of the engines for informational purposes.

There was a very unpleasant surprise for them: the overhaul interval for the AL-41F1S engine is 1500 hours, and the total resource is 3 hours, but if you replace the HPC stages and other elements, the service life can be extended by another 000 hours. It's unfortunate (for the Chinese), but their engines are not yet capable of providing at least half of this resource.

Chinese engineers believe that in afterburner the AL-41F1S produces 14 kgf of thrust, but this is not the limit, and in emergency cases the engine can produce up to 000 kg of thrust, that is, there is a certain reserve for modernization. Therefore, new ceramic materials in the “hot” part and a new ignition system make the prospect more significant.

In general, the Chinese pay great attention to working with temperature, and the path of their Russian colleagues is clear and interesting to them. The AL-31FP engine had t=1K in HPC, the AL-665F already had 41K, and the AL-1F828S had about 41K. That is, there is constant progress that can be advanced through new materials.

And here is the pinnacle of the Chinese aircraft industry, the J-20.


The vast majority of these fighters fly Russian AL-31Fs. Airplanes produced after 2019 use the WS-10, which is more powerful but short-lived. Hence, China’s desire to acquire the AL-41F1S for its aircraft and, in the future, the same AL-41F1, which is still “Product 30,” looks quite normal.

Why the Chinese need the AL-41F1 is clear: to modify the J-20A, which should become “further, higher and faster,” for which domestic engines are clearly not enough.

The requests from neighbors are simply amazing. According to minimal estimates, the PLA would like to purchase about 330 AL-41F1S engines. And the calculation of existing and those under construction J-20, two engines per aircraft.

This is, you know, a PARTY. Here, of course, there will be very long bargaining, since the Chinese will not be like that if they do not try to bend our aviation industry to discounts for such a quantity. But in fact, this is a very difficult decision, which shows how much better our engines are than Chinese ones.

But there are problems.

And the main problem is not the price, the main problem is the inability of Russian factories to process such an order. Here you need to understand that the same UMPO will not abandon all orders to please the Chinese. But 330 engines is not enough for a couple of months of work, you understand. This is a very long-term contract. But in addition to the Chinese order, UMPO must build engines for the Russian Aerospace Forces, and other countries are also placing orders.

Here lies a cunning move: by placing such a huge order for their Air Force, the Chinese are trying to delay the conclusion of a similar contract between Russian manufacturers and the Indian Air Force. The Indians are by no means fools and also want to modernize their Su-30MKI. These planes are powered by the AL-31FP, an engine more advanced than the one on Chinese planes due to the deflectable thrust vector, albeit only in the vertical plane.

In principle, installing the AL-41F1S instead of the AL-31FP will give a very good result in terms of maneuverability and power, so the aspirations of the Indians can be understood: the Su-30MKI is not the most modern and efficient aircraft today, but don’t send them to the scrap heap, especially since Are they durable like many other models?


In general, the cunning plan of the Chinese side is to weaken the Indian Air Force as much as possible, leaving them without modern engines. But this is only one of the components of success.

The second is that by equipping their aircraft with Russian engines, the Chinese will quite easily be able to bring the WS-15, which so far does not really want to be finished, to condition.

WS-15 is a promising project, carried out according to the “I made it from what I had” scheme. And with all the advantages of the engine, the car has disadvantages: it does not produce a power of 15 kgf, because the ignition system is completely outdated. For the same reason, the engine cannot be started if it stalls in flight or is turned off. It reacts very poorly to overheating due, again, to an outdated powder casting scheme for components and is not particularly reliable at high rotation speeds. Well, second-generation DD000 monocrystal blades with internal liquid cooling are not an indicator for a modern aircraft.

In general, it is clear that in order for the J-20 to become a full-fledged fifth-generation aircraft, it also needs a full-fledged fifth-generation engine. The AL-41F1S is not one, it’s still a 4++, but the WS-15 is an even smaller fifth-generation engine.


However, the purchase of AL-41F1S in such quantities will definitely move the PLA Air Force forward, and the operation of Russian engines will make it possible to bring the WS-15 to condition. Even through complete disassembly and direct copying of all components of the Russian engine.

And the plasma ignition system, which ensures oxygen-free starting of the engine in flight, is generally the cherry on the cake, which the Chinese have been licking their lips at for a very long time.

And here it is also worth remembering that appetite comes with eating in the sense that the PLA Air Force is armed with several hundred aircraft equipped with WS-10 engines of various modifications, we are talking about the J-11DG and J-16, which trace their origins from the Su-27, which means the AL-41F1S will take root there quite easily. And for the J-11, which is frankly weak in this regard, this will be a very worthy modernization, and the J-16, which cannot be called old, will receive even more capabilities.

Well, naturally, the Chinese are very interested in the next stage, AL-41F1.


PLA specialists believe that Russian engineers will be able to stabilize thrust at around 11 kgf in cruising mode and 000 kgf in afterburner. But in order to confirm the service life at the level of 18 hours, according to PLA experts, the afterburner power will have to be reduced to the level of 000 kgf. But even in this case, according to Chinese engineers, the power of the AL-5F000 will be approximately 16% higher than that of the AL-000F, which is used on PLA Air Force aircraft.

So in any case, the game is worth the candle.

However, not everything in Russian engines suits the Chinese. With a grin, I read such “healthy” criticism of Russian engines on the pages of the PLA Daily Newspaper that I laughed good-naturedly.

It turns out that the main problem of Russian engines is insufficient service life and short overhaul intervals! This is what I understand, this is patriotism! The fact that Chinese engines are not capable of producing even a third of the Russian ones is a trifle, because the PLA pays for its engines in yuan, and for Russian ones in dollars.

But there is nothing to do, the Chinese will have to wait, because there are simply no other options and are not expected. Or AL-41F1S and once AL-41F1, or our WS-15.

In China, they believe that the further path of development of Russian engines (and, sorry, there are no others for them), expressed in the model announced as AL-41F2, will lead to the creation of a three-circuit engine. This will make it more economical in cruising mode and will reduce the temperature picture of the entire aircraft, since due to the purging of the third circuit, the temperature of the exhaust gases will decrease.

In addition, there was information that Russian engineers decided to implement the idea of ​​S-shaped air intakes in the new engine. On the one hand, this will greatly slow down the passage of air into the engine, on the other hand, it will completely hide the blades, which well reflect the radar signal.

Of course, the engine will have plasma ignition, which will allow the engine to be started at altitudes of up to 5 meters.


And the last thing is two-plane thrust deflection vectors. There is information that the vector deviation angle will be 40-60 degrees, which is more than enough to provide the aircraft with super maneuverability.


Ideal engine? From the point of view of PLA specialists, yes. And only one thing spoils the picture: this engine is being developed in Russia, not in China.

Alas, Chinese engines, despite all the criticism of Russian ones (often unfair), are not comparable to them. Mainly in resource matters. Just last year, Chinese engineers honestly admitted, which simply stunned many, that their thrust vector deflection mechanisms on the WS-15 have a maximum service life of 50 hours. And the nozzle is deflected vertically by no more than 17 degrees, and horizontally by no more than 15 degrees.

Russian thrust vector deflection mechanisms last 150-200 hours. And the deflection angle of our engines is greater, what if the most modern WS-15 works in this regard like our AL-31FP and nothing more. And naturally, despite the fact that the Chinese copied their engines from ours, they are not at all interchangeable. Other control units, different software.

And the main problem is that China does not have the required number of design engineers specifically for high-tech equipment, and there is nowhere to train them. Except Russia. Yes, there is an opportunity to look for the remnants of engineering personnel in Ukraine, perhaps there are still some left there, but the problem with leaving is comparable to that of China. In any case, training its personnel will take years, which is absolutely not in China’s interests. This means that there will be a search and enticement of specialists on the side. The sad thing is that there aren't that many sides.

And the side that is the West will not give anything to China. Although, it’s not particularly necessary, because when the Chinese tried to copy American engines for their Xian H-6, it turned out that it was much easier, instead of copying JT8D from Pratt-Whitney, to buy Russian D-30KP-2 from Il- 76. Yes, the D-30KP-2, to put it mildly, was not similar to the AM-3, the “native” engines for the Tu-16/Xian H-6, but the Chinese completely remade the compartments of their aircraft for these engines without any problems. And even though the D-30KP-2 were not adapted for the Tu-16 at all, if the party said so, then everything will fly. This is China...


And by the way, story with D-30KP-2 can serve as an example of how even a great desire is broken by impossibility.

At the very end of the last century, the Chinese military responsible for repairing equipment (the PLA Air Force Department of Weapons and Equipment) came to the conclusion that it was very expensive to maintain the D-30KP in Russia. And this process takes a lot of time. Naturally, the question arose about repairing engines in China, having received the appropriate permits and documentation for this.

The Chengdu Engine Corporation (420th Aircraft Engine Plant) sent a proposal in 1998 to the PLA Air Force command to transfer to it the procedures for partial or complete repair and airfield maintenance of two D-30KP-2 engines. The process of studying the D-30KP-2 by Chinese specialists took more than two years. In 2000, China began a series of negotiations and consultations on engines with the Russian side.

The result was the WS-18, a Chinese copy of the D-30KP-2. It began to be installed on the Xian Y-20 transport aircraft and the H-6K bomber. Everything was beautiful and patriotic, but...

In 2009, it became known about a contract for the supply of a large batch of D-30KP-2 to China, and from 2009 to 2020 China received 436 D-30KP-2 engines from Russia. Here is the whole situation up to the yuan. The WS-18 is ours, but it’s better to fly on the Russian D-30KP-2.

And so with almost any Chinese engine. You can find a similar story about anyone.

Now in the Chinese specialized press you can often find statements on the topic that the PLA Air Force will no longer purchase D-30KP-2. And not at all because the WS-18 is better, no. It’s just that the Chinese now secrete gastric juice when looking at the D-30KP-3 Burlak.


D-30KP-3 "Burlak" - D-2000KP-30, deeply modernized in the 2s at NPO Saturn. It features a new fan, a bypass ratio increased by more than 1,5 times, a thrust increased by 1 ton (13 kgf), and fuel consumption reduced by 000%. The song, not the engine!

Of course, specialists from the 624 Engine Research Institute in Chengdu and specialists from the same 420 Engine Plant will do everything to master at least the repair of this engine, not to mention assembling their own version.

However, it is not as simple as it seems. An aircraft engine is, excuse me, not an iPhone to copy.

Therefore, no country in the world is as interested in the developments of the Russian aviation industry as China. China has nowhere to go: Europe and the United States will not rush to a tender to provide China with military equipment, as happens in India every year. China must get out of all situations on its own. And therefore, having a neighbor like Russia as friends is very beneficial.

Indeed, China does not need the Su-57. They learned how to make airplanes, but how effective they are is another question. But the Russian plane is interesting because of its engine. The engine is the heart of the aircraft, and to create a fifth-generation aircraft based on the third engine - no, it won’t work that way. That is why military cooperation will be of interest to China for a long time.
135 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    22 October 2023 04: 35
    Since when did a 57th generation engine suddenly appear on the Su5? At least in Rostec they don’t know anything about it. They tell us everything about 4+++++
    1. +9
      22 October 2023 04: 48
      Disassembling the engine down to nuts and bolts is not a problem. The problem is to reproduce the technology. You need to know all the manufacturing operations of compressor turbine blades. And who will show and tell?)))
      1. +16
        22 October 2023 05: 21
        Quote: TermNachTER
        Disassembling the engine down to the bolts and nuts is not a problem... But who will show and tell?

        It's like that! But that’s exactly what the Chinese do - they take everything apart down to the smallest nut, and then they try to reproduce it all, but only in their factories. This is what they did with our fighters and Japanese lithographic machines. It is clear that at first it turns out to be shit, but after several attempts an understanding begins to come of how this can be done technologically. China also has its own engineers, and judging by the industry there, they are not at all stupid...
        1. 0
          22 October 2023 05: 49
          In order to understand the modes of material processing - temperature, pressure, time, etc., it seems that the Chinese were not even 30 years old enough.
          1. +34
            22 October 2023 06: 38
            Quote: TermNachTER
            In order to understand the modes of material processing - temperature, pressure, time, etc., it seems that the Chinese were not even 30 years old enough.

            You can admire the skill and knowledge of Russian craftsmen for as long as you like, until you begin to remember the epic of recreating already known samples.
            If the Chinese have not only a desire to understand and learn, but also human resources, then in Russia there is nothing for this except a hypothetical desire... And attempts to create 25 high-tech jobs ended in inviting millions of migrants for unproductive unskilled labor.
            * * *
            In the 50-60s, passenger cars from the USSR were very successful. And not only in the domestic market. Just 30 years ago, no one knew about Chinese cars, electronics and other innovations. What do we see today? Therefore, I ask you, do not pose as masters of the world and the elements. Be more modest.
            So far, the Chinese are achieving something that they cannot remember and do in Russia. And in Russia, in a broad sense, the concepts of dishonor, conceit, cynicism are spread... And no one will tell you phrases that get stuck in your throat like a lump and do not allow you to clear your throat:
            1. 0
              22 October 2023 10: 30
              Chinese cars, electronics and other consumer goods are something that they successfully stole in the West, and in Russia, too. They have only just begun their own developments. But in terms of weapons, airplanes, missiles, submarines - they are still a long way off. It is very difficult to steal such things.
              1. -4
                22 October 2023 21: 29
                Nikolay, the narrow-eyed people pulled everything they could from us, starting in the 90s... and then from the West.
                ... people, why is there an Irish fighter on takeoff in the photo?...
                and a transport worker...
              2. -5
                22 October 2023 21: 30
                Nikolai, the narrow-eyed ones took everything they could from us,
                starting in the 90s... and then from the West.
                ... people, why is there an Irish fighter on takeoff in the photo?...
                and a transport worker...
                1. +3
                  23 October 2023 01: 24
                  Quote from Egeni
                  why is there an Irish fighter on takeoff in the photo?...
                  and a transport worker...

                  This is an Indian Su-30MKI. And in the parking lot it looks like an An-26. I could be wrong about the transporter...
                  1. +1
                    23 October 2023 08: 29
                    I am sure that the Chinese will receive engines and technologies from our leadership, and they are luring away our specialists in batches.
                2. +1
                  23 October 2023 23: 01
                  Quote from Egeni
                  .. people, why is there an Irish fighter on takeoff in the photo?...
                  and a transport worker...
                  Madam, uh... I know Irish whiskey, I know Guinness, there was also a Guinness bar..., an Irish fighter request recourse
                  1. 0
                    24 October 2023 01: 05
                    Quote from Egeni
                    in the photo is an Irish fighter taking off?... and a transport aircraft...
                    I looked closely and the flag looks similar, but the circles are different. And the Irish have a somewhat more modest air fleet...
          2. 0
            23 October 2023 20: 40
            We too, sorry... in the 90s Leiko opened a joint venture to produce saws with carbide blades. They showed everything except the temperature, pressure and sintering time of the powder of these same plates. MISSIS received the composition in a week, but without these 3 key ones, nothing!!! our saw is 10 km cutting Leiko 30. Nowadays no one even bothers: 10 km and resharpening, but it’s cheaper and your own...
      2. kpd
        +3
        22 October 2023 14: 06
        Even the presence of a complete set of technological maps will not make it possible to improve the product without the design part, so the Chinese are trying to improve engines using the “scientific poke” method. In principle, the method certainly works, but the investment of time and money is simply enormous.
        1. -2
          30 October 2023 22: 13
          kpd (Konstantin). 22 October 2023 14:06. NEW. your -
          "..Even having a complete set of technological maps will not make it possible to improve the product without the design part, so the Chinese are trying to improve engines using the “scientific poke” method. In principle, the method certainly works, but the investment of time and money there is simply enormous...."


          You are right. hi but unlike the current Some.Some-Kakers. crying ..China not only has an UNDERSTANDING of the differences WANTS business bully from the paramount importance of the role of the STATE hi AND ISSUES OF STATE SECURITY soldier But also the ability to create SO to manage the ECONOMY and INDUSTRY, etc. national economy. that "THERE IS MONEY. WE ONLY DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT, EARN AND PROTECT!" bully
          Therefore, everyone “traversed their own 30-year path”:
          - they (China) from a bowl of rice and iron smelting from every household...to a super-state that has become on par with the USA... good which the current Russian Federation buys from cars to electronics... Will soon become the FIRST in the WORLD..
          - RF (USSR) from one of the first countries in the WORLD which was constantly “looked back” and considered the USA. providing for oneself essentially 100% everyone...up to electronics. It seems like Lithuania has decided to blackmail a country with a refusal to supply - nails, sewing needles... belay
          Fine. that something remains and there seems to be AWARENESS feel ... but there are many who want to “switch” from Western “supply” according to Gaidar (we’ll buy everything) to Chinese... remaining largely in the words of Barn Obama - “... a gas station...” and a supplier of raw materials even without attempting to process them initially. negative Like under the USSR. when Japan was proudly supplied with our trucks and sledgehammers. bully Essentially, the “deposits” are wood and metal. Japan “digested” them into wood products and equipment. buying for pennies. and selling the USSR is much more expensive. Unfortunately, attempts to stop THIS and establish full-fledged processing and production of THEIR products were quickly “faded” by future “businessmen” with a % approach from the “dacha” deal.
          R.S. It's time to stop thinking about it. recourse and REALIZE. that in the WORLD the majority have already made CONCLUSIONS and are WORKING HARD, understanding the upcoming WORLD CHANGES and that. that THIS will be accompanied by WARS (so far the Russian Federation has only a military formation with the WHOLE Western world) and requires OWN reliable and working economy and OWN industry (the experience of the economies of the WORLD has long been considered and the world justified - the book "Crystal of Growth" Moreover, professional and not "successful " liberals with experience working for Soros - the "children" of Gaidar and Chubais - Nabiulina. Siluanov. Oreshkina and others. )With these “tops, chops, some-kers,” we will definitely “catch up and surpass” the United States in terms of pizza and food delivery. and in the future - rickshaws. They are “so far only “successfully” sanitizing those with gold and foreign exchange reserves of the Russian Federation by handing them over to the WEST or “writing them off” with the interest rate of “NOT ours” Central Bank with “advanced” export of capital and WITH a “NATURALLY successful” changing ethnic map of the Russian Federation... am
    2. +2
      22 October 2023 05: 28
      Quote: AC130 Ganship
      Since when did the 57th generation engine suddenly appear on the Su5?

      Do not quibble! wink
    3. 0
      25 October 2023 09: 51
      The 5th generation engine has been in development for a long time and prototypes have been flying for a long time, only the stupid and lazy do not know about “product 30”, developed and now actively tested at UMPO.
  2. +14
    22 October 2023 05: 14
    An article written for hype. You can write about the first industrial power in the world, and the first by a huge margin, that it “lacks industry” only either by being extremely ignorant (which cannot be said about the author), or for the sake of a catchphrase.
    Another thing is that against the backdrop of desperate dances with tambourines in order to get “high-tech” Chinese Mavics for the front at least through third countries, against the backdrop of the fact that the PRC remains for us the only light in the window for the purchase of industrial goods, such statements, even purely for the sake of hype, look simply indecent.
    The same applies to the rest of the author’s statements, for example, the question posed in the title “Why does the PRC need the Su-57?” The real answer is no reason, they are not going to buy it. The same applies to the WS-15, which, according to the author, has not yet been used in flight, but in fact is already being produced, well, etc.
    As for our 31-series engines, yes, the PRC needs them; they have a huge fleet of J-10 and J-11 fighters on them, so they will still be purchased.
    P/S. The article is well characterized by interesting information about the fact that Indonesia preferred the Su-30 MK2 to the Chinese. And this is really true. Just a small clarification: this was in 2007.
    1. +6
      22 October 2023 06: 43
      Quote: Belisarius
      An article written for hype.

      Moreover, a person very far from aviation.
    2. -2
      22 October 2023 06: 55
      Quote: Belisarius
      You can write about the first industrial power in the world, and the first by a huge margin, that it “lacks industry” only or by being extremely ignorant

      You are very polite, dear Belisarius. Globalization, do you know this word? No country can provide itself with everything it needs on its own. It is impossible to produce everything from an aspirin tablet to a spacecraft. Even China can't do it.

      For example, here we produce luxurious engines that operate at extremely high temperatures. But we don’t know how to make normal, high-quality burners. It doesn't seem complicated. The country is northern, demand will be stable. And we are still trying to get hold of German or Finnish ones. Which work for 20 years easily
      1. +5
        22 October 2023 08: 40
        Quote: Winnie76
        Even China can't do it.

        Till...
        Just look at Chinese school and higher education. Not yet possible. They just need time...

        Quote: Winnie76
        It is impossible to produce everything from an aspirin tablet to a spacecraft.

        They already produce all this, with interest, providing the whole world with their (already quite decent in quality) goods...
        1. -6
          22 October 2023 10: 08
          Quote: Doccor18
          They already produce all this, with interest, providing the whole world

          What's that all? It is impossible to produce everything and be competitive in it all.
          The above-mentioned gas burners, boilers, I have been working for 25 years, I have never heard of Chinese ones. For some reason they order nuclear power plants from us, how can this be, because China is so high-tech.
          There is no problem with food security if soybeans are purchased in megatons.
          What about civil aviation, Boeing and Airbus?
          From the military: S-400, S-500, Mi-26, Tu-160, Voronezh-DM, A-135, Severodvinsk, Borey, Yars. Where are all these Chinese analogues?
          1. +7
            22 October 2023 15: 26
            Quote: Winnie76
            For some reason they order nuclear power plants from us, how can this be, because China is so high-tech.

            And now, after your unbridled fantasies, a moment of reality.
            There are 55 nuclear rectors in China, 6 of which are ours. The share is slightly above 10%.
            22 reactors are being built (for comparison, there are 37 reactors in the Russian Federation, 23 of them are still Soviet, 2 are under construction), of which 4 are ours.
            1. -1
              22 October 2023 19: 05
              And Chinese reactors - are they Chinese? or stolen in Russia or France?
              1. +6
                22 October 2023 20: 45
                What does stolen in Russia mean? Develop your thought further, otherwise I don’t quite understand this process.
                1. -7
                  22 October 2023 21: 10
                  Quote: JD1979
                  I don't quite understand this process

                  By copying. Xerox Yes

                  Evil tongues lie that this is one of the few things that the Chinese really know how to do.
            2. -4
              22 October 2023 20: 50
              Quote: Belisarius
              There are 55 nuclear rectors in China, 6 of which are ours. The share is slightly above 10%.
              22 reactors are being built (for comparison, there are 37 reactors in the Russian Federation, 23 of them are still Soviet, 2 are under construction), of which 4 are ours.

              You got away famously. Maybe you can still provide data based on total power, and not by quantity. Reactor is different from reactor. Nevertheless, the question hung in the air: why order from the Russian Federation if they can do it themselves? And how many of these 55 reactors are purebred Chinese?
              Quote: Winnie76
              And now, after your unbridled fantasies, a moment of reality.

              So what is your reality with civil aviation in China? Are they really their own planes?
              1. +10
                22 October 2023 23: 16
                Quote: Winnie76
                Nevertheless, the question hung in the air: why order from the Russian Federation if they can do it themselves?

                Then what did they have in 1991? zero reactors. And the USSR has -44.
                When you develop such a high-tech industry from scratch and build at such an incredible pace (all 55 of their reactors are new), then purchasing from industry leaders, be it from the Russian Federation or from the United States, is a natural and correct process. You can and should steal and buy. But on the basis of this you need to do your own thing, which is what the PRC did. If you take an interest in the history of industrialization of the USSR, you can easily see that we did the same thing.
                And when you build 22 power units simultaneously (that is, in 11 times more than in the Russian Federation, for which nuclear energy is almost the only surviving industry that everyone sets as an example), then the question of the possibility of purchasing several units is also not raised. They sell it for cheap - you have to take it.
                Quote: Winnie76
                So what is your reality with civil aviation in China? Are they really their own planes?

                For now they are Western, but soon they will become their own. For example, the C919 is already flying and in production. And there will be 692 aircraft on firm orders alone.
                And it’s unclear what you want to say with your off-topic, excuse me, childish attacks. That China has its own problems? Of course there is.
                The question is different; in reality, we are now in the capital world simply native savages sitting on the legacy of the Soviet civilization that we destroyed and parasitizing on its remains.
                You can, of course, swagger as long as you have something to parasitize on (for example, the nuclear industry), but if there is nothing to parasitize on, for example, a UAV, then we just have complete and absolute zero. And we need to understand this and start fixing this.
                But instead, such articles invite us to look for problems among those who are now 100 times stronger than us.
                Krylov most accurately wrote about such thinking: “Ay, Moska! I know she is strong, That she barks at the Elephant.”
                1. -1
                  23 October 2023 08: 11
                  Quote: Belisarius
                  They sell it for cheap - you have to take it

                  You are smart about devaluing, this is actually called conquering the market. Those. If the Chinese sell cars inexpensively, they are great. If we sell an inexpensive serial product, it’s the other way around. I'm not even talking about subsequent income related to fuel supplies and maintenance.
                  Quote: Belisarius
                  For now they are Western, but soon they will become their own. For example, the C919 is already flying and in production. And there will be 692 aircraft on firm orders alone.

                  And all these orders are Chinese. We return to my thesis: you cannot do everything equally well, you cannot be a leader in everything. The Chinese can force only their airlines to buy their planes. And the whole world will choose based on the criteria of price/quality/safety. Those. from the market leaders and so far they are not Chinese
                  Quote: Belisarius
                  in reality, we are now in the capital world simply native savages sitting on the legacy of the Soviet civilization that we destroyed and parasitizing on its remains.

                  I am touched by your childish absolutes. "China is great and can build everything. Mavic is the pinnacle of high technology, nothing can compare. We are pathetic savages consuming a great inheritance." Remind me about Apple's capitalization and polymers. To be honest, I'm tired of this discussion
                2. +3
                  23 October 2023 19: 10
                  Quote: Belisarius
                  when you are building 22 power units at the same time (that is, 11 times more than in the Russian Federation, for which nuclear energy is almost the only industry that has survived and is set as an example to everyone)

                  How many units does Rosatom build abroad? There is already excess generation in the Russian Federation, so we build for ourselves moderately, but how many orders are being implemented abroad? So there is no need to attack our nuclear industry; we are world leaders in this today. And China... it is developing very quickly, showing very good results, and you are right - it acts like the USSR during the period of Industrialization and, in general, like the USSR before 1955.
                  Quote: Belisarius
                  For example, the C919 is already flying and in production. And there will be 692 aircraft on firm orders alone.

                  The MS-21 is much better, and the Chinese have imported engines. And soon these engines may no longer exist. That is why, in the case of the CR-929, they still relied on our PD-35, although before that they were going to use American or English. But after looking at what they did with the Russian Federation and what they began to do with it, I entered the money into the project of our PD-35. And it is right . I wouldn’t be surprised if they soon have a desire to put our PD-14 on their S-919. And this will also be the right decision. Our Aviation Industry can use such orders to boost its industry, primarily in the field of engine building, which will largely remove from the industry the bit of the “engine curse” that we were given since the time of Gaidar, and which were not allowed to develop during the period of Manturov.
                  It’s the same for military engines - the Chinese never came up with a “stone flower”, but they are persistent and will achieve their goal someday. But times are turbulent, it is necessary to increase the fleet of military aircraft, and it is advisable to do this with reliable engines. Therefore, cooperation with Russia becomes no alternative for them. For us, this is a reason to EXPAND the production of aircraft engines for large and long orders. In addition, the internal needs for combat aircraft and engines for them have grown exponentially. This is a chance for a big breakthrough in the industry and we must take advantage of it.
            3. +1
              25 October 2023 09: 57
              Belisarius, don’t blame this ridiculous, concocted nonsense of yours, both in aircraft engines and in nuclear technology, China is very much inferior to us, this is very noticeable in the development of its strategic nuclear forces, which are still oh so far from ours and from the American ones.
          2. +3
            23 October 2023 07: 14
            Quote: Winnie76
            Quote: Doccor18
            They already produce all this, with interest, providing the whole world

            What's that all? It is impossible to produce everything and be competitive in it all.
            The above-mentioned gas burners, boilers, I have been working for 25 years, I have never heard of Chinese ones. For some reason they order nuclear power plants from us, how can this be, because China is so high-tech.
            There is no problem with food security if soybeans are purchased in megatons.
            What about civil aviation, Boeing and Airbus?
            From the military: S-400, S-500, Mi-26, Tu-160, Voronezh-DM, A-135, Severodvinsk, Borey, Yars. Where are all these Chinese analogues?

            Firstly, where is the S-500? And secondly, they bought the S-400 3 years ago, now they’ll just finish studying it and start riveting. And the difference between the S-400 and the S-300 is not so global, it’s only essentially new rockets
            1. 0
              25 October 2023 10: 05
              The whole global essence of the differences lies in the missiles, and the S-500, by the way, is already mass-produced and supplied for rearmament of the Central District and Moscow, instead of the S-300 and in addition to the S-400.
        2. +2
          22 October 2023 19: 03
          That’s right, they don’t spare money on education, and Chinese teenagers deservedly take first place at international Olympiads. But the scientific and design school is something that has been developed over the years. Passed on from older to younger. They don’t have them yet, not least because they preferred to steal (buy) without going into details.
          1. +3
            23 October 2023 00: 23
            RUSNANO - and that says it all.
      2. +4
        22 October 2023 15: 36
        Quote: Winnie76
        It is impossible to produce everything from an aspirin tablet to a spacecraft. Even China can't do it

        In fact, China produces everything from aspirin to spacecraft. Another thing is that it is really impossible to be the best in everything. Even for China.
        But what do these conclusions have to do with the topic of the article? If you have anything substantive to say? And by the way, returning to the article, the author never voiced the only really significant problem in the Chinese engine industry. It lies in the number of new engines relative to the volume of production of new aircraft.
        It’s one thing to produce 5 aircraft a year, and quite another to produce 70.
    3. -3
      22 October 2023 07: 17
      Chinese Mavics for the front are not "high-tech", they are cheap by military standards and quite effective in places. I don’t know, even if you’ve never been to Russia, but you could at least google it, “high-tech” Mavics are so “hard” to get in Russia that they are sold in almost every online store.
      As I understand it, your comment is some kind of cranberry from the category, we have introduced sanctions, all the stores in Russia have empty shelves...
    4. 0
      23 October 2023 07: 44
      Quote: Belisarius
      against the backdrop of desperate dancing with tambourines in order to get “high-tech” Chinese Mavics for the front at least through third countries


      You still haven't corrected the mistake in your comment.
      Should I buy a Chinese Mavic for you in Russia, or will it be enough to tell you a couple of dozen stores where you can buy them in Russia? If you have large volumes, I can facilitate deliveries from China. Why are you allegedly buying something through third countries with tambourines? If you described Ukraine, then indicate that you described it!
  3. +5
    22 October 2023 05: 14
    Maybe together?

    Perhaps not entirely on topic, but about two years ago it flashed in the news about an alleged mutual exchange of technology with the Chinese - we tell them all about a rocket engine (I don’t remember which one), and they are transferring to us the technology for producing microchips. I don’t know whether this deal took place or not...
    1. +7
      22 October 2023 05: 41
      What for? We give them round timber, and they give us boards, at the price of one board per carload of round timber.
      1. KCA
        0
        22 October 2023 07: 00
        Maybe you'll be enough of a fool to turn it on? Are the manuals old? From January 1, 2022, the export of round timber is prohibited in Russia, double bass, maybe something is happening, but these are tears
        1. +5
          22 October 2023 08: 45
          Quote: KCA
          export of round timber is prohibited,

          And the timber?
          Little difference...
          1. KCA
            -4
            22 October 2023 08: 57
            Small? To produce timber, round timber must be dried for at least a year and then processed. Once these processes are completed, it’s never difficult to cut the timber into boards, why the hell waste money? And the board is in great demand here too, prefabricated houses are advertised 100500 times a day, just like that? Boredom? Or maybe there is a demand?
            1. +1
              24 October 2023 23: 52
              It’s immediately obvious that they didn’t work at the sawmill! Raw birch is sawn if money is needed!
          2. -5
            22 October 2023 10: 32
            Regarding the export of round timber - this is a big deal))) there are great specialists there, the Carpathians are already bald.
      2. +7
        22 October 2023 08: 44
        Quote: nazgul-ishe
        We give them round timber, and they give us planks

        Not for us, we don’t have enough solvent people. We give them round timber, and they supply elite parquet boards in the EU and the USA...
        1. KCA
          -3
          22 October 2023 11: 03
          Aha, our entire forest is cedar pine, oak, larch and birch, but where do 90%, if not more, of pine and spruce go? Do the Chinese make elite parquet boards from pine? Well, let it last for two months, right? Study the hardware, even if they sell untreated wood for luxury parquet boards, it costs PPC
          1. +2
            23 October 2023 02: 18
            We are NOT talking about round timber and boards. Technologies have not developed since stagnant times; there is no one willing to invest in development.
            1. KCA
              0
              23 October 2023 09: 05
              Well, yes, no, just type in a search engine a wood processing plant, it’s full of products and technologies that invest in production, do you all live in the 90s? Where do they get paper from business card size to A0? In Finke? Fuck, all Russian
              1. +2
                24 October 2023 01: 21
                On whose equipment is this produced?
          2. The comment was deleted.
    2. -4
      22 October 2023 12: 27
      中国政府投资3380亿人民币在芯片上,俄罗斯有投资100亿吗?
      1. +5
        22 October 2023 20: 14
        The Chinese were offended by us because they do not know how to make normal aircraft engines.
        1. +5
          22 October 2023 21: 58
          Quote: sifgame
          The Chinese were offended by us because they do not know how to make normal aircraft engines.

          He was not offended, but laughed
          ..........translation
          I laughed so hard. What kind of microchip technology do you have in Russia? ? . The Chinese government invested 338 billion yuan in chips, and Russia invested 10 billion yuan?
          1. +6
            23 October 2023 16: 30
            Still, he was offended. If he also translates his post below. And the article is not at all about chips.
    3. +6
      23 October 2023 01: 59
      Quote: Luminman
      and they transfer to us the technology for producing microchips.

      It's not all about the technical process, but about the presence of a LITHOGRAPHER! And they are not even sold to the Hongfuzes, because... We forbade the Dutch (ASML Company) to do this - they contain American parts and technology. That's all. Therefore, we develop ours based on lenses, not mirrors, and different from the Dutch one in the method of producing extreme ultraviolet radiation (EUV). The Dutch use it based on the evaporation of tin with a CO2 laser, and we use a laser-plasma x-ray source based on xenon. Our experimental setup is based on the nanolithography method - maskless X-ray lithography at a wavelength of 6,7 nm. And here is what the foreign press writes:
      Instead of the molten tin source used in projection lithography by ASML, the Russian development uses a xenon-based target. With comparable efficiency, this significantly simplifies the design of the source and the laser system, minimizes contamination of optical elements, reduces the operating wavelength by 20% when operating at a wavelength of 10,8 nm, and by 2 times at a wavelength of 6,7 nm.
      Of course, decreasing the wavelength proportionally increases the resolution of the lithograph. Scientists from the USA agreed that the lithograph based on the Russian development will be 1,5-2 times more efficient than that of the ASML company. If everything can be implemented on time, the world's first X-ray photolithographic installation will appear, operating in the wave ranges of 10,8 and 6,7 nm with a resolution of up to 1 nm.
      We are the most scientifically powerful country in the world and are not particularly dependent on the Chinese.
    4. +1
      23 October 2023 07: 17
      Quote: Luminman
      Maybe together?

      Perhaps not entirely on topic, but about two years ago it flashed in the news about an alleged mutual exchange of technology with the Chinese - we tell them all about a rocket engine (I don’t remember which one), and they are transferring to us the technology for producing microchips. I don’t know whether this deal took place or not...

      Microchip technologies are known. We need equipment that is no longer supplied to China
      1. KCA
        +1
        23 October 2023 08: 25
        Recently, experts found a processor made using 7nm technology in the latest Xiaomi smartphone, or bought a lithograph, or created it themselves, in general, China put and continues to put horse apples on sanctions
        1. +1
          23 October 2023 12: 33
          Quote: KCA
          Recently, experts found a processor made using 7nm technology in the latest Xiaomi smartphone, or bought a lithograph, or created it themselves, in general, China put and continues to put horse apples on sanctions

          The trick is that this processor could be manufactured at one of the factories in Taiwan or Samsung, just like our Elbrus before.
          1. KCA
            +2
            23 October 2023 13: 29
            How? TSMC is under full control of the USA and is now moving there, Samsung is not moving anywhere, but the USA can squeeze it tightly, memory chips for Apple, screens for Apple, never two dollar orders, Apple will be put on the ass, but also Gnusmas, although Gnusmas , precisely at the expense of China, it may score on the US
        2. +1
          23 October 2023 13: 15
          Quote: KCA
          Recently, experts found a processor made using 7nm technology in the latest Xiaomi smartphone, or bought a lithograph, or created it themselves, in general, China put and continues to put horse apples on sanctions

          According to the latest data, the Chinese themselves can produce machines for 28 nm chips. Everything below is what they managed to import before the sanctions. They made 7 nm by squeezing the maximum out of previously imported equipment. It’s quite easy to stop the smuggling of machines. It’s enough to sell them only to large companies trusted manufacturers, of which there are not many
  4. +6
    22 October 2023 06: 00
    Quote: TermNachTER
    . And who will show and tell?)))

    Whoever shows and tells will sit down for at least ten years...generosity towards foreign partners costs us too much.
    Nowadays, technology should be protected like your pants.
  5. +1
    22 October 2023 06: 35
    The AL-31FP engine had t=1K in HPC, the AL-665F already had 41K, and the AL-1F828S had about 41K

    If there are such temperatures behind the compressor, it’s scary to imagine what’s baking behind the turbine laughing
    1. +5
      22 October 2023 06: 58
      Quote: Zufei
      If there are such temperatures behind the compressor, it’s scary to imagine what’s baking behind the turbine laughing

      Behind the turbine, the temperature is slightly lower - the gases leaving the combustion chamber begin to cool in the turbine itself - on its blades...
    2. 0
      22 October 2023 11: 35
      A good article, but of course for specialists. Just why did it become fashionable to put the letter K after numbers (thrust, for example). (Kilo). There is a simple Russian thousand. After all, no one says in the store: you paid 1 kiloruble. After all, we ourselves pollute our language, and then we ourselves are dissatisfied with many abbreviations and foreign words. Although this is probably how they already teach it at school.
      1. 0
        22 October 2023 13: 13
        This has been taught in school for over a hundred years (literally). This is called the "metric system" and "metric prefixes".
      2. KCA
        +4
        23 October 2023 08: 28
        Is that really a kilo? Actually, kilo is abbreviated with the lowercase letter "k", here, most likely, "K" - degrees Kelvin
    3. +1
      23 October 2023 18: 22
      We are talking about the gas temperature in front of the turbine engine blades. The editor who edited the article is obviously out of touch. If the compressor had even 1500 Kelvin, then the steel alloy would not like it very much
  6. +13
    22 October 2023 06: 46
    Quote: Roman Skomorokhov
    Today, Chinese engineers are trying to solve their engine problems with the help of an old ally, titanium. However, titanium, due to its temperature capabilities, does not allow a significant increase in the temperature of the mixture in front of the gas generator. It might be possible to use a solution such as spraying ceramic materials onto the blades of a high-pressure compressor and then baking them, but Chinese engineers have not achieved significant success in this area either. And a ceramic coating of titanium blades could raise the temperature at the HPC inlet by about 100-150K.

    Well, as it were, in the first stages of the high-pressure stage, titanium blades are already used... But why raise the temperature before the high-pressure stage? Cycle efficiency decreases request
    I can’t understand why there was such a sudden jump to the compressor, was it about the turbine at the beginning?

    Quote: Roman Skomorokhov
    Another solution is to create a titanium-rhenium alloy.

    This is just a new word in metallurgy laughing

    Quote: Roman Skomorokhov
    Why rhenium and not, say, tungsten?

    Because the main material of the working and nozzle blades of turbines is nickel, and rhenium is the main alloying element that makes it possible to increase the heat resistance and heat resistance of the blades.

    Quote: Roman Skomorokhov
    Another thing that the Chinese would gladly borrow in any way. They really need a new ignition system for engines that would ensure that the engine starts during flight.

    This option exists even without plasma ignition. wink

    Quote: Roman Skomorokhov
    The AL-31FP engine had t=1K in HPC, the AL-665F already had 41K, and the AL-1F828S had about 41K.

    Now I understand why: Roman confuses a compressor and a turbine smile And it wouldn’t hurt to check the numbers.

    Quote: Roman Skomorokhov
    Hence, China’s desire to acquire the AL-41F1S for its aircraft and, in the future, the same AL-41F1, which is still “Product 30,” looks quite normal.

    AL-41F1 is still “product 117”.

    Quote: Roman Skomorokhov
    Russian thrust vector deflection mechanisms last 150-200 hours.

    500 hours for "product 96"
    1. +3
      22 October 2023 07: 02
      Titanium blades are used

      Even when I was studying, we were told that in ten years the blades would simply be grown in laboratories, like crystals are grown. 30 years have passed, and they are still made of titanium... wink
      1. +3
        22 October 2023 08: 13
        Why complicate things? Titanium operates quietly up to 550°C, and is lighter than any heat-resistant alloy, which is just right for most compressors. The process of hot die forging of blades is well developed, highly productive and cheap.
        1. -3
          22 October 2023 09: 37
          Quote: Lozovik
          Why complicate things?

          Titanium is an expensive and rarely found metal. That's the whole point...
          1. +6
            22 October 2023 09: 49
            Titanium is the fourth most common structural metal in the earth's crust. And titanium dioxide, from which titanium blanks are actually obtained, is the most common white dye.
            What is the alternative?
          2. 0
            22 October 2023 13: 03
            And besides, in the last stages of the compressor, next to the combustion chamber, 550 degrees is not enough. The temperatures are higher there, so it’s only heat resistant.
      2. KCA
        0
        23 October 2023 08: 32
        Exactly? I remember there was a TV program, they showed how blades are printed from ceramics and baked in an oven, there was no smell of titanium, maybe blades are not made like this for all engines, but this is the fact
        1. +1
          23 October 2023 21: 32
          Quote: KCA
          there was no smell of titanium there, maybe they don’t make blades like that for all engines, but this is the fact

          Since this is a fact, then name what engine they are installed on.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +1
      22 October 2023 10: 35
      This happens when you don’t know the design of a turbojet engine, at least in general terms, but you simply “tore” an article from some site)))
  7. 0
    22 October 2023 06: 54
    This time Roman went a little too far........ fellow , of course, the Chinese are dependent on us for engines, BUT! given their capabilities and desire, the production time will be the shortest possible. And I think that we will have to order almost everything from them, a banal example is the auto industry. Unfortunately!
    1. +1
      22 October 2023 13: 06
      They have been copying their aircraft engines using pirate methods for about 30 years, but so far “things are still the same.” The assigned resource of Zaporozhye TV is 3 - 117 - 6 thousand hours, Russian VK - 2500 - 5 thousand hours, the Chinese analogue is 1 thousand, but as a rule it lasts 800 - 900 hours.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. +5
    22 October 2023 07: 53
    Before selling engines abroad, it would be necessary to create a stock of engines for our Air Force in case of war.
  10. Eug
    +3
    22 October 2023 08: 21
    The Chinese “big order” tactic has been known for a long time and is called “strangling a partner in an embrace.” The USSR did the same before the Great Patriotic War in some industries of Germany. Judging by the article, the Chinese, much more than the factories, should be interested in VILS, CIAM and VIAM, which are developing the alloys themselves and the technologies for their production, although in what form and where exactly they will be produced and processed into finished parts is a question. And also - as far as I know, the temperature of the gases in front of the high-pressure TURBINE is largely determining the parameters of the engine, but the author writes about the temperature of the gases in front of the high-pressure COMPRESSOR.
    According to D-30KP. More than 10 years ago I heard an opinion that the D-30KP III series (that was what it was called then) was more promising than the PS-90 for the Il-76. The argument was that with less thrust and higher specific fuel consumption, it has a smaller diameter, which ultimately, taking into account the lower drag of the Il-76 with the D-30 KP-III, gives a gain in fuel efficiency compared to the PS-90. But they chose what they chose.
    1. +1
      25 October 2023 10: 27
      For military aircraft, fuel efficiency is important, but not the most important characteristic; the thrust produced, especially in non-afterburning mode, reliability, and service interval are much more important.
  11. +9
    22 October 2023 09: 18
    And quite a bit is missing for this: an army, a navy and industry
    ...
    Much has already been said about the shortage of rare earth metals and China's lack

    To say this about a country with either a 1st or 2nd economy and occupying 1st place in the world in the export of rare earths is a great responsibility. Or maybe insufficient competence.
  12. -2
    22 October 2023 09: 48
    Still, our school has been developing for decades, one might say actively since the war, but when did they start? Until they go through the same enormous path, nothing will work out. Those cars bake like pies, every year there’s a new model, but even that is of questionable quality, and what’s more complicated...
    1. 0
      25 October 2023 10: 30
      Well, their cars, let’s face it, are still not up to par with the Korean ones, let alone the Japanese and European ones.
  13. +2
    22 October 2023 10: 03
    Just as a drunkard gave the United States everything they demanded, so our guarantor will give everything for next to nothing...
  14. +2
    22 October 2023 10: 30
    Quote: Luminman
    Quote: Zufei
    If there are such temperatures behind the compressor, it’s scary to imagine what’s baking behind the turbine laughing

    Behind the turbine, the temperature is slightly lower - the gases leaving the combustion chamber begin to cool in the turbine itself - on its blades...

    Behind the HP TRD compressor is usually 250-350°C, even if you add 273K, it’s not very much. Regarding the temperature behind the turboprop engine, you are confusing a fan or turboshaft turbofan engine, for which there is nothing left behind the turbine, with a turbojet engine with an FC, for which everything just begins behind the turbine)
    1. The comment was deleted.
  15. +3
    22 October 2023 10: 35
    Well, if creating an engine is not copying an “iPhone,” then why can’t we make engines copy an “iPhone”? Just don't say that we don't need it.
    1. -1
      22 October 2023 12: 03
      Maybe it really isn't necessary. The main problem is that those who need it are also not able to do it for many reasons. Re-gluing nameplates is much cheaper (well, at least +/- our OS) + it seems to me that there is a great desire for quick profit (Yotaphone for 30 thousand not with advanced hardware)
  16. +2
    22 October 2023 10: 52
    They have big problems with engines, and we have similar ones with lithographs. Is it impossible to come to an agreement somehow?
    1. +1
      22 October 2023 12: 14
      Maybe there is a fear of inequality? Still an engine for combat aircraft
      1. 0
        22 October 2023 14: 04
        Quote: Russian_Ninja
        Maybe there is a fear of inequality?

        Naturally there is. From the Chinese side. The technologies of modern microelectronics are incomparably more valuable than the technology of modern aircraft engines. For it is not the perfection of engines that determines the outcome of a modern war with a strong enemy, but the perfection/quantity of electronics.
  17. -1
    22 October 2023 12: 37
    ws-15已经量产,如果一台不成熟的发动机会量产吗?是你们傻还是我们是傻子?
    The吗?
    还有,中国的工业化是世界第一吧,是头猪都能在产业链中学到些什么。
    1. -1
      22 October 2023 13: 42
      1. 2. 一个不我们看看美国,他们的F-3还没有完全运行并且还没有起床,现在有人试图让F-22也有"儿童疾病",所以这些只是不同的策略,我们Posted by:道,但他们有35架1000代飞机(有预订),但我们没有。 我们仍然不是一个非常Home 5. 5.一项巨大的成就,猪肉对糖醋酱
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +3
      23 October 2023 10: 14
      Dear, you read the “article” for internal consumption and the comments reveal a more realistic view of the situation, you should not take seriously what this author writes. Personally, I have no doubt that your country will cope with the production of WS-15.
      Regarding electronics, there is no need to delude yourself; the United States can just as easily stop any technology transfer in this regard, which still exists. EUV has already been covered, it will be very difficult even for China to create its own technical processes, for commercial use - most likely no earlier than 2030, some kind of alternative to ASML will appear. All semiconductor technologies that China now uses are Western. For some unknown reason, the West is still supplying equipment up to 24 nm, which it has never allowed for Russia. And he can cover it up at any time.
    4. +1
      24 October 2023 19: 14
      我觉得你没有必要同俄罗斯人争论,无论是这篇文章还是评论,都当图一乐就行
  18. +4
    22 October 2023 14: 40
    There is nothing worse when they write about something they have not the slightest idea about. This article is a prime example. The author, at best, saw China on the globe. But he undertakes to draw conclusions on a cosmic scale. Next - to Bulgakov.
    In order to cover such topics, one must have at least a general idea of ​​the development of fundamental sciences in China and their plans in this direction. The author is far from these questions. Actually, as with most of the issues he covers.
  19. +3
    22 October 2023 15: 05
    Gossip summarized in a long worthless article
    1. -1
      23 October 2023 22: 02
      Not even gossip, just a collection of creepy and stereotypical texts. The previous article was more interesting.
  20. -1
    22 October 2023 16: 59
    Quote: Winnie76
    Quote: Doccor18
    They already produce all this, with interest, providing the whole world

    What's that all? It is impossible to produce everything and be competitive in it all.
    The above-mentioned gas burners, boilers, I have been working for 25 years, I have never heard of Chinese ones. For some reason they order nuclear power plants from us, how can this be, because China is so high-tech.
    There is no problem with food security if soybeans are purchased in megatons.
    What about civil aviation, Boeing and Airbus?
    From the military: S-400, S-500, Mi-26, Tu-160, Voronezh-DM, A-135, Severodvinsk, Borey, Yars. Where are all these Chinese analogues?

    China doesn’t talk much about its Strategic Missile Forces at all, and the fact that they can’t give birth to their TU-160 is just ridiculous, they would like to buy a couple of them not in the Russian Federation, but in Ukraine in the 90s-2000s, there was a time in Ukraine where the TU-160 was parked 1000 was guarded by a couple of conscripts, give 300 Baku and roll, measure, photograph what you want, the Chinese are just pragmatists, they believe that a nuclear war is unlikely and their 500-16 missiles are dispersed and flavored with false positions so that if something happens, they will definitely cause unacceptable damage, but shoot The Kyrgyz Republic, for example, in Taiwan and the Tu-95 is enough for the eyes. Doesn’t the Russian Federation fly Boeings and Airbuses? By the way, the military commissar is 400 percent Soviet developments and their modernization, the same S-80 is essentially a hello from the 90s, it’s just that in the 300s development stopped and it was originally planned to be called the S-27 simply with a new index, like the SU- 33K suddenly became SU-XNUMX.
    1. 0
      22 October 2023 17: 45
      A very controversial statement. The Tu - 160 can also operate with a missile cruise missile system, not necessarily with a special warhead. Quite a versatile aircraft. And due to the supersonic mode, it can reach the launch position much faster than the Chinese copy of the Tu-16.
      1. -3
        23 October 2023 22: 03
        A “universal plane” that needs to be prepared for departure within 2 days?
  21. -1
    22 October 2023 17: 07
    Quote: Vadim S
    Still, our school has been developing for decades, one might say actively since the war, but when did they start? Until they go through the same enormous path, nothing will work out. Those cars bake like pies, every year there’s a new model, but even that is of questionable quality, and what’s more complicated...

    You are behind the times, in the last 5-8 years, AvtoVAZ’s handicrafts, especially after the introduction of sanctions, did not stand anywhere near the same Gili, and considering that Chinese cars sell well and in Europe this is recognition, and from a sophisticated consumer. Moreover, they know how to adapt well, they see that their cars are rotting too quickly - get additional anti-corrosion + improved paint, this is not a UAZ where everyone improves the paint and the beetles climb in the first winter.
    1. -3
      23 October 2023 22: 10
      Well, crafts are crafts, but I have never heard of anyone dreaming of buying something from Gili, especially at the “two prices” that we have on the market. They buy anything, parallel imports in any form. Although, I agree, there are already a lot of Chinese around and there’s no shame in riding them. There is one more thing, a colleague cannot repair the Chinese - no one will undertake it, everyone is just screwed, no capital for engines, at best - they offer to order a replacement engine for 120 thousand rubles. (here you can recall with nostalgia the “contract” Japanese engines, which cost less). Those. In a high degree of probability, those who drive comparatively budget “Chinese” cars are now stupidly wasting what they spent, after which the fate of the vehicle is in big question.
  22. Des
    0
    22 October 2023 17: 21
    “Yes, the D-30KP-2, to put it mildly, was not similar to the AM-3, the “native” engines for the Tu-16 / Xian H-6, but the Chinese completely remade the compartments of their aircraft for these engines without any problems. And even the D-30KP -2 were not adapted for the Tu-16 at all, if the party said, then everything will fly. This is China...”
    In my opinion, this is normal.
    “However, it’s not as simple as it seems. An aircraft engine is, excuse me, not something you can copy an iPhone.”
    No one will forgive, because the Chinese managed to copy the iPhone - the same with the aircraft engine. But we won’t achieve even that. And China will gradually do it.
    The article is still interesting, thank you.
  23. +2
    22 October 2023 17: 38
    This is a compilation of a series of articles (not Roman) “In the Su-57, China is only interested in the engine,” and the Chinese themselves were the diggers. And in one of the articles AL-41F1 is called edition 30 (which, of course, is not true - AL-41F1 edition 117).
    By itself, the AL-41F1 in working form is unlikely to be able to provide 18 tons of thrust because it is reduced in size (diameter, for example) compared to the original AL-41F (which was supposed to give 18 tons) and more modest parameters were included in it in advance.
    According to some gossip ed. 30 also has the designation AL-41F.., but further numbers/letters are unknown, the Chinese, represented by expert Wang Yongqin, designate it as AL-41F2, maybe it is, maybe not, but the masses will most likely go under the 30 edition under a different name designation.
    1. -1
      23 October 2023 22: 14
      For “product 30”, it seems that they have already changed their shoes towards a reduced diameter and a thrust of about 16 tons. But you will have to wait quite a long time.
  24. -1
    22 October 2023 18: 18
    Quote: TermNachTER
    A very controversial statement. The Tu - 160 can also operate with a missile cruise missile system, not necessarily with a special warhead. Quite a versatile aircraft. And due to the supersonic mode, it can reach the launch position much faster than the Chinese copy of the Tu-16.

    The fact is that strategists at the first stage of a nuclear war have no chance at all, the same Tu-95 flying along America are banal suicide bombers, my aircraft modeling teacher told me this while slightly drunk, and he finished his service in the 80s as an airfield engineer, hasn’t flown since the 70s. The same TU-160 can fly at supersonic speed for a very short time, the main point is to avoid fighters, but the fact is that the missiles, compared to the 80s when it was developed and built, have become much longer-range. This means that entering the enemy’s air defense zone is like death for the TU-160, and without entering this zone the missile defense system can be launched even from an airship. Therefore, whether the TU-16 or TU-95 is in fact not much worse than the TU-160, as long as the radars, aircraft carriers, interceptor airfields, and air defense batteries of a potential enemy are alive, any strategist either launches his missiles outside the enemy’s air defense coverage area, or it is a kamikaze. But a ballistic missile doesn’t care about these conventions, the target is not easy, and during a group launch, no air defense or missile defense system is capable of destroying them all. With all this, instead of one strategist, you can build several ICBMs, and for a strategist you also need to train a crew, which is actually a lot of money. For example, Americans say that the most valuable thing in Abrams is the crew, because its training is twice as expensive as the cost of the tank. Pilot training has always been more expensive than tank training.
    1. -1
      22 October 2023 19: 11
      How can I get a Tu-95 (Tu-160) flying 1500 km away. from the West Coast of the USA? I explain why 1500 km, because we are adding another 2000 km. and we get the Midwest, i.e. the USA can be “shoot right through” while being completely safe.
    2. -1
      23 October 2023 07: 29
      Quote from Tim666
      Quote: TermNachTER
      A very controversial statement. The Tu - 160 can also operate with a missile cruise missile system, not necessarily with a special warhead. Quite a versatile aircraft. And due to the supersonic mode, it can reach the launch position much faster than the Chinese copy of the Tu-16.

      The fact is that strategists at the first stage of a nuclear war have no chance at all, the same Tu-95 flying along America are banal suicide bombers, my aircraft modeling teacher told me this while slightly drunk, and he finished his service in the 80s as an airfield engineer, hasn’t flown since the 70s. The same TU-160 can fly at supersonic speed for a very short time, the main point is to avoid fighters, but the fact is that the missiles, compared to the 80s when it was developed and built, have become much longer-range. This means that entering the enemy’s air defense zone is like death for the TU-160, and without entering this zone the missile defense system can be launched even from an airship. Therefore, whether the TU-16 or TU-95 is in fact not much worse than the TU-160, as long as the radars, aircraft carriers, interceptor airfields, and air defense batteries of a potential enemy are alive, any strategist either launches his missiles outside the enemy’s air defense coverage area, or it is a kamikaze. But a ballistic missile doesn’t care about these conventions, the target is not easy, and during a group launch, no air defense or missile defense system is capable of destroying them all. With all this, instead of one strategist, you can build several ICBMs, and for a strategist you also need to train a crew, which is actually a lot of money. For example, Americans say that the most valuable thing in Abrams is the crew, because its training is twice as expensive as the cost of the tank. Pilot training has always been more expensive than tank training.

      All this is correct, only the locations of the ICBM silos are all determined, as are the trajectories of the missiles, built accordingly for the USA. And the plane, firstly, can change attack points, and secondly, the missiles can fly at low altitude. Well, don’t forget about Europe, it also has its own portion of yao is provided
    3. 0
      23 October 2023 11: 51
      There is no such position in the Air Force as "airfield engineer". The technician probably told the kids about flying while drunk.
      1. +1
        23 October 2023 21: 18
        Quote: RaDeVl
        There is no such position in the Air Force as "airfield engineer". The technician probably told the kids about flying while drunk.

        Does OBATO have a technician?
  25. 0
    22 October 2023 19: 21
    It would be interesting to see an analysis of foreign aircraft engines and their development technologies. Maybe even the whole history of the development of fighter engines.
  26. -3
    22 October 2023 20: 23
    Quote: TermNachTER
    How can I get a Tu-95 (Tu-160) flying 1500 km away. from the West Coast of the USA? I explain why 1500 km, because we are adding another 2000 km. and we get the Midwest, i.e. the USA can be “shoot right through” while being completely safe.

    If there is an ocean underneath, then aircraft carriers with fighters and destroyers with missile defense systems sail in the ocean
    1. 0
      25 October 2023 11: 16
      Aircraft carriers will be destroyed in the very first hours of a global conflict; these floating targets are not viable in the event of a “big” war.
  27. The comment was deleted.
  28. -2
    22 October 2023 23: 25
    Looking at the Chinese auto industry, and the sad faces of Mercedes and BMW top managers when they get acquainted with new products from China, I think they will resolve this issue too.
    1. +2
      23 October 2023 07: 32
      Quote: Glagol1
      Looking at the Chinese auto industry, and the sad faces of Mercedes and BMW top managers when they get acquainted with new products from China, I think they will resolve this issue too.

      There is nothing good in the Chinese automobile industry. I would rather take the same Logan for a million now than a non-galvanized Moskvich for 2.5
    2. +2
      23 October 2023 12: 01
      That's right, only in Chinese cars the main units were created with the participation and licenses of the Germans. But no one wants to help make turbojet engines...not even civilians. And copying doesn’t work here anymore.....that’s the problem. But it can also be solved, only longer.
  29. 0
    23 October 2023 06: 02
    Quote from Tim666
    If there is an ocean underneath, then aircraft carriers with fighters and destroyers with missile defense systems sail in the ocean

    Can you imagine how big the ocean is? KX-102 flies 5500 km to the target.
  30. +1
    23 October 2023 10: 30
    The evidentiary argument is as follows: the Chinese have information that the pre-production version of Product 30 is already flying on the T-50-7 laboratory aircraft. In total, a preliminary series of 10 pieces was produced for testing. For comparison, testing the AL-31 engine took 68 engines. If UMPO and Saturn do not produce a series of engines for testing that are at least approximately similar to their predecessors, then Russian aircraft manufacturers have problems.

    Mathematical modeling capacity has increased exponentially since then
    1. -2
      23 October 2023 22: 16
      They can model and draw, even make a demonstrator in a single copy, but with production, even small-scale production, it’s just some kind of curse.
  31. 0
    23 October 2023 10: 33
    And I read somewhere about a resource of 6000 hours for the latest versions of Al41. And to increase engine production capacity, there are all proven business solutions in the world - China's investment in a turbojet engine production plant in the Russian Federation... from the Russian side - a firm contract for the supply of Al41 turbojet engines to China.
    1. 0
      30 October 2023 03: 48
      Not everything is possible with money alone, and we had to verify this using the example of the production of ship engines, when no amount of money could fill the shortage of personnel, after 30 years of saying that these same personnel would always crowd behind the entrance, waiting for the owner’s whistle. Now those who are responsible for the revival of the aircraft industry will have to be convinced of this. There will be a lot of people who want to get a big salary if they give it, but what will they be able to do? Even on the most accurate and advanced CNC machine, if you do not have the necessary knowledge and experience, you will be surprised when you receive completely different dimensions from those specified by the program if you are making a complex, high-precision part.
  32. fiv
    0
    23 October 2023 16: 11
    Dear author! Kilonewtons are a unit of force, in this case traction force, like kgf. Why use units from different systems in one article, it looks sloppy. Power is measured in watts. If you are too lazy to write a lot of zeros - in kilo- or megawatts.
    Check your articles or submit them for editing, and show respect to your readers.
  33. 0
    23 October 2023 17: 08
    An aircraft engine is, excuse me, not an iPhone to copy.


    but they didn’t copy, but transferred production to their companies, and brought it as close as possible to iPhone standards, yes, there is a time lag, but “they have what they have”
  34. 0
    23 October 2023 19: 05
    What a drool on Burlak - he didn’t pass the test. And that's a couple more years.
  35. +4
    23 October 2023 19: 27
    Mr. Skomorokhov, finally understand that “INDUS” are those who profess “HINDUISM”, there are not so many of them even in India
    (of course, relatively) a lot, the rest are just INDIANS.
    1. -2
      24 October 2023 16: 51
      I don't give a fuck about Skomorokhov. He makes money.
  36. 0
    23 October 2023 19: 54
    Of course, after China showed its attitude towards Western-style democracy, that is, in 1989 in Tiananmen Square, the West was not at all eager to share with the PRC not only military technologies; dual-use technologies were also banned. In general, the nuts are fully tightened
    After this sheer nonsense I didn’t read any further.. Was it that China was blocked from access to technology after 1989? What is he carrying...
  37. 0
    24 October 2023 10: 41
    Roman is also a sinologist/sinologist. Oh damn...
  38. -2
    24 October 2023 17: 05
    And in all three areas, the Chinese work as befits communists. That is, for a breakthrough.


    I just can't stop laughing. Breakthrough communists with a toilet paper shortage. By the way, if anything, in the PRC there has been no sign of communism for a long time.
    1. -1
      25 October 2023 11: 21
      Well, yes, but what is there, has capitalism really already appeared???
  39. 0
    25 October 2023 01: 43
    Why on earth should we give them the most modern engines and technologies? Let them try to buy an F-35 or F-22 from the USA!
    Or you try to copy any foreign modern machine or ask foreigners for the technology of its production and equipment for it!
  40. +2
    26 October 2023 20: 31
    However, it is not as simple as it seems. An aircraft engine is, excuse me, not an iPhone to copy

    Why didn’t they copy our iPhone?
  41. 0
    28 October 2023 20: 47
    The thought arises of a used condom, they will use it and throw it away, on the other hand, manned aircraft are a thing of the past, it can be allowed, China has problems in aviation, especially in engines and aviation technologies. Not critical.
  42. 0
    15 January 2024 23: 43
    "In principle, installing the AL-41F1S instead of the AL-31FP will give very good results in terms of maneuverability and power, so aspirations Hindus One can understand: the Su-30MKI is not the most modern and efficient aircraft today, but why shouldn’t they be sent to the scrap heap, especially since they are tenacious as an example to many other models?”

    After the start of deliveries to Ukrovermacht indian 155mm shells, better than an aspen stake, for every member of the Indian delegation for the purchase of our weapons, there is nothing.

    We didn’t sell our own Mother to them (the Indians)...
    Submarines, please, planes, which oh how we need them now (who knew then), please, tanks, please (and how they ferociously tested them, you can write an ode).
    Oil at a very big discount, if you please.
    Etc.

    Either it's the Chinese or the Iranians.

    And when there is a surplus, it’s better to sell the engines (with airplanes) to the packs, let the Indians dance!