Revolver of the XXI century

97
Revolver of the XXI century

The military industry is always striving to develop new and improved weapons systems that provide high efficiency in combat conditions. At the ORЁLEXPO 2023 exhibition, the latest model range of revolvers of the XNUMXst century was presented. New operating principles make these models truly unique. The system was given the name RL - “Lepkov Revolvers”, and the name of the models themselves was “Country”.

The new revolver system is equipped with a unique mechanism that allows you to automatically remove cartridges after each shot. Thanks to this development, the reloading speed of revolvers has increased by 30%. This significantly speeds up weapon reloading, which is especially important in combat conditions and sports shooting, where reaction speed can be a decisive factor. Fast reloading and minimal changes in the weapon's vector allow the shooter to quickly return to shooting and maintain continuous firepower.



The innovative method of ejecting the cylinder for revolvers is a new and more convenient technology that greatly simplifies the process of reloading a weapon. The ejection itself is carried out from a button; under the influence of a spring, the drum flies out to the position desired by the arrow.

This concept is a model range of three options that meet all the requirements of modern shooters and hunters.


Model RL "Country" is a unique revolver with a full-fledged BULL-PAP configuration, and is a universal shooting unit for any task. The bullpup layout makes it compact with a long barrel of 167 mm and a total length of the model of 275 mm. This model also has automatic firing.


Model RL "Country-K" (classic) is a hunting adaptation of a revolver, which with an extended barrel and butt can comply with Russian legislation as a hunting rifle. Features large Picatinny rails for any additional modifications. And automatic extraction of cartridges makes its use a convenient process without lifting the weapon upward when ejecting cartridges.


Model RL "Country-M" (mini) is a small-sized revolver for concealed carry, sport shooting and self-defense.


Lepkov's new revolver system caused a wave of both positive and negative reviews in the weapons community. Opinions were divided. Regarding this development, some gun lovers believe that this is an interesting concept and a new look at revolvers. The other side believes that the classics are unshakable or that revolvers are already a thing of the past and have finally given way to pistols. However, there are connoisseurs of this type of weapon in every country, which should not be forgotten.

I would like to demonstrate a model that was not included in the first part of the article.

The RL “Country-M” (mini) model is a small-sized revolver for concealed carry, sport shooting and self-defense. Also in the Russian adaptation the traumatic version of this weapon is considered.


Not much time has passed since this development was presented to a wide audience, and the community has accumulated many questions in relation to this system.

We talked with the developer of this weapon and asked him the most popular questions in the community.

Why was this development created at all, since revolvers are increasingly becoming secondary compared to pistols?

We tried to look at revolvers from a new angle, because they are unique and inimitable weapons. This project is primarily aimed at improving and completely reworking revolvers. We also hope that when our project is fully implemented, there will be more fans of this weapon. After all, our development makes revolvers more convenient and comfortable to use, both for experienced and novice shooters.

Extraction of cartridges: why is it needed in revolvers, because one of the reasons why they are valued is the ability not to leave cartridges after firing?

This function is needed for the convenience of shooters; of course, we understand that for professionals, unloading spent cartridges takes a little time, but not all of us are professionals. As for the actual extraction of cartridges, it is carried out on the right side of the weapon into a special casing, which removes the cartridges away from the shooter after each shot.
Since the models in the photo are prototypes, we did not demonstrate some of the capabilities that they will have in the future for reasons of leaking information about the project ahead of time. However, we can assure you that a feature to disable automatic case ejection will be added to this system at a later date to meet all the needs of our future customers.


Why does a revolver need automatic firing with such a small amount of ammunition?

As they say, “it is better to have the opportunity, but not use it, than not to have the opportunity at all.” Of course, we understand that not every country will allow such a function. That is why automatic fire is planned as an expanded capability of this system, and not its key advantage.

Why is the revolver in a bullpup configuration?

First of all, our task is to show the functionality of the system, and such a weapon layout is primarily aimed at this. Our system can be integrated into a revolver of any size and configuration, no matter whether it is a shotgun, a classic revolver or a bullpup version.
As for the functionality of bullpups in revolvers, this decision is due to the powerful ammunition that is often used in revolvers. Thanks to powerful cartridges, increasing the barrel entails an increase in the effectiveness of the ammunition.
It is also impossible not to notice that this is the first full-fledged bullpup revolver in a pistol version. In third-party models, the drum was located above the handle, and not behind it, which can only be partially considered a bullpup layout.

Many people have paid attention to the ergonomics of this weapon, what is the reason for this?

The photo shows prototypes, of course, in the final version the ergonomics will be worked out at the highest level. However, at the initial presentation we did not set ourselves the goal of bringing it to perfection. Of course, this can be confusing if you study these models remotely, however, as the in-person presentation of the models showed, the reviews were mostly positive.

Will it be possible to purchase your weapons in Russia?

Yes, for the Russian market it is possible to adapt these models to the required calibers and dimensions, which will comply with Russian legislation.

When will these revolvers be available for purchase?

It is still difficult to say when our products will be available for purchase. At the moment, the project is under development, we realized that it needed to be improved, thanks to the weapons community, and we directed all our efforts towards this.
How soon it will be possible to purchase these revolvers is at the mercy of the project’s investors, whom we are now actively looking for; this is a priority and determines how quickly our models will become available to a wide audience.
97 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +39
    17 October 2023 04: 45
    Revolver of the XXI century

    Rare freaks... wassat
    And the article itself is outright hack. General phrases and lack of any technical characteristics. negative
    1. +3
      17 October 2023 07: 16
      Rare freaks...
      I agree with you. There is nothing left of the classic design of the revolver; it looks like some kind of futurism. In the 90s in Russia, gunsmiths again paid attention to the revolver, and even models appeared that were planned to be put into service with the police and were supplied experimentally. But... But the simplicity and ease of use of this type of weapon should not be forgotten.
      1. +11
        17 October 2023 10: 31
        There is nothing left of the classic design of the revolver; there is some kind of futurism on its face.

        It’s like clothes from “high fashion” - a normal person wouldn’t use this, but the money is being made.
      2. +5
        17 October 2023 12: 29
        I wonder if XNUMXD plastic printing is a prototype or a working sample?
        If the latter, then reliable pistols made from a 3D printer are a terrible thing and at the same time desirable for many...

        For such drawings in the public domain, for example, you need to have your hands torn off up to the elbows. But a printed pistol can handle itself by the tenth shot!

        And if these are just mock-ups, then there’s not much to talk about for now. Raw and unripe...
        1. +6
          17 October 2023 15: 47
          I wonder if XNUMXD plastic printing is a prototype or a working sample?

          Hardly prototypes. Judging by the general phrases of the article, the author himself does not really understand what he is doing and why. This is what the weapon of the future looks like in the imagination of the designer of some novel, but not the weapon of a technician, and especially not the weapon of a gunsmith.
          But this is now a popular topic for startups - to attract money with a non-standard enticement, and then it doesn’t matter what happens, the money has already been cut.
        2. +3
          27 October 2023 04: 56
          Quote: RealPilot
          For such drawings in the public domain, for example, you need to have your hands torn off up to the elbows.

          Hands should be torn off for such a weapon design!
          1. 0
            2 December 2023 17: 24
            You shouldn't go to grabcad.
        3. +1
          27 October 2023 08: 56
          Quote: RealPilot
          I wonder if XNUMXD plastic printing is a prototype or a working sample?
          If the latter, then reliable pistols made from a 3D printer are a terrible thing and at the same time desirable for many...

          For such drawings in the public domain, for example, you need to have your hands torn off up to the elbows. But a printed pistol can handle itself by the tenth shot!

          And if these are just mock-ups, then there’s not much to talk about for now. Raw and unripe...

          There is a sea of ​​such drawings in the western and American segment of the network. In the United States, home-made weapons are now a trend. And we’re not just talking about pistol calibers, but about rifles and carbines. They are made mostly from plastic on a 3D printer, and for example the barrel is made of steel and even with rifling made using etching technology. And this knowledge has already spread too widely across the network. Now virtually everyone can take advantage of this experience and make their own weapon. And for this you do not need any turning or milling machines.
    2. +10
      17 October 2023 08: 16
      Quote: Tucan
      Rare freaks

      The ergonomics of the handle alone is worth it.
      Compared with the first available samples from the USSR and the USA



      1. +5
        17 October 2023 12: 43
        Good afternoon, Mikhail. smile
        This nightmarish “creativity” of Mr. Lepkov evoked very specific associations in me. In short, it's creepy. wassat
        1. 0
          17 October 2023 14: 48
          Quote: Sea Cat
          Good afternoon Michael

          hi
          Is Mr. Lepkov a gunsmith or an enthusiast?
          1. 0
            17 October 2023 14: 50
            Gunsmith, as far as I remember. Unfortunately, only the photo survived; the text floated away somewhere. request
        2. +1
          27 October 2023 12: 13
          Quote: Sea Cat
          This nightmarish “creativity” of Mr. Lepkov evoked very specific associations in me.

          No, no, no, I think I know which way the wind is blowing.

          Bolters, bolt pistols... and now the bolt revolver. smile
          Well, then everything is according to the canon:
          Demonstration executions of both military and civilians;
          A five-hundred-meter-long robot phlegmatically tramples tanks!
          An infantry platoon breaks through to a trench in bayonet formation,
          Two soldiers finish off the commissar of their company!
      2. 0
        17 October 2023 12: 45
        The model from the USA is currently only available as a 3D design
        1. +2
          17 October 2023 14: 44
          Quote: Systems Generator
          The model from the USA is currently only available as a 3D design

          I tried to find a video about working Lepkov revolvers.
          Just news from the exhibition.
          What stage are they at?
          1. 0
            17 October 2023 18: 31
            The project is at the development stage, not all details of the work have been disclosed yet.
            1. +2
              18 October 2023 00: 26
              The project is under development...

              where he will remain.
      3. +1
        2 November 2023 21: 00
        Quote: Mister X
        The ergonomics of the handle alone is worth it.


        Well, they seem to promise to fix everything in the future:
        The photo shows prototypes, of course, in the final version the ergonomics will be worked out at the highest level. However, at the initial presentation we did not set ourselves the goal of bringing it to perfection.
    3. +2
      17 October 2023 09: 22
      Even the caliber is not indicated)
      And despite the advertising nature of the material, there is no close-up photo of the “small-sized” mini. A concealed carry revolver is an intrigue, of course. Until the first announcement of dimensions. The shapes are inspired by models for printing on a 3-D printer, with maximum simplification.
      1. AUL
        +3
        27 October 2023 07: 29
        And, most importantly, why this mixture of snake and hedgehog? A revolver is simple, reliable, and cheap. But hemorrhoids with recharging, a lot of force during descent and a small drum capacity. The pistol has a large magazine capacity, fast reloading, easy triggering (essentially achievable). But more complicated and more expensive.
        The device described has collected all the disadvantages of both systems, but does not seem to have inherited the advantages.
        1. 0
          27 October 2023 14: 11
          Regardless of this incomprehensible plastic model, ala the first attempts of a schoolboy whose dad bought a 3D printer in BD - a “bullpup” revolver will allow you to use long cartridges, a long barrel, a silencer, and at the same time have a normal, digestible weight distribution.
          Why use long cartridges? For example, for underwater weapons. Or for a silent one, capable of penetrating higher-class armor and advanced helmets.
          1. +2
            27 October 2023 17: 24
            The only revolver that could fully work with a silencer was the revolver. For the rest, don't even try. There is literally no obturation of the drum at all.
            1. 0
              27 October 2023 17: 44
              Obturation can be achieved without the Nagant scheme, if the revolver is made with a gas piston, self-loading, with fur. supporting the drum.
        2. 0
          27 October 2023 20: 11
          Quote from AUL
          A revolver is simple, reliable, and cheap. But hemorrhoids with recharging, a lot of force during descent and a small drum capacity.
          The pistol has a large magazine capacity, fast reloading, easy triggering (essentially achievable). But more complicated and more expensive.
          Revolver - "love at first sight" love

          Gun - "marriage of convenience" bully

          Old times...
          hi
      2. 0
        15 February 2024 06: 17
        The caliber indicated on the prototype is .357 Magnum.
        1. 0
          15 February 2024 08: 58
          Quote: Rusfaner
          The caliber indicated on the prototype is .357 Magnum.

          The author added a close-up photo later.
  2. +1
    17 October 2023 04: 53
    The RL “Country-M” (mini) model is a small-sized revolver for concealed carry, sport shooting and self-defense.

    We are not designed to carry weapons for self-defense. And such models will not even cause fear in the attacker, as from the sight of a weapon - he will think that it is a craft from a toy store.
    Therefore, there is nothing to discuss ...
  3. +1
    17 October 2023 04: 57
    If someone pointed THIS at me, I would just laugh back and say, "Boy, are you trying to scare me with your toy blaster?" As a military weapon, it is not visually perceived at all, and you will agree that this is also an important factor, for example in self-defense.
    1. +9
      17 October 2023 12: 52
      Nobody is going to scare you. He quickly took it out - a quick deuce to the center of the figure, retreat, another deuce. And then you will laugh at the blaster. By the way, are you such an expert that you can instantly determine the model of the weapon by the muzzle of a pistol pointed at you? Smells strongly of balabol.
      1. +4
        17 October 2023 22: 18
        This is where I support you. Weapons are not intended, in principle, to intimidate.
        1. +1
          27 October 2023 04: 22
          Scary is not the right word. True statement - can be used if available if it is combat. Example: all countries have approximately the same number of inappropriate hooligans. But will this hooligan get into a direct fight with a policeman in Japan and England, or in the USA and France? In the first pair of countries, the policeman is armed only with a baton, in the second - a military weapon in an open holster.
      2. 0
        27 October 2023 17: 26
        That’s right, I subscribe to every word. The attacker must see the weapon only from the other world.
  4. +10
    17 October 2023 05: 14
    The “weapons” in the photos look like mock-ups printed on a 3D printer from black plastic) They look disgusting, both in aesthetics and in ergonomics, especially the handle - you just feel the most uncomfortable grip. And was it really impossible for a bullpup revolver to make the aiming line lower by lowering the cylinder down by the handle? And again anglicisms... "Country", fuck it
    1. +2
      17 October 2023 07: 10
      You can go to jail for a real revolver. It’s just that now another “bizk” has emerged. Everyone rushed to print everything on 3D printers. Some comrades are going to produce “Tyrchikovsky” motors in series on 3D printers; at a prototype price of 3-4 thousand rubles, they get it for 100 thousand on the printer. But it’s so relevant, in trend, and so on. It feels like people have gone crazy.
  5. +4
    17 October 2023 06: 56
    What a horror. My eyes almost ran out...
  6. +4
    17 October 2023 08: 22
    It’s a rotten business, there is no arms market in Russia, you can’t sell it to anyone, this is not America. As one gunsmith (lives in America) said, they have a saying there (like an axiom) that no matter what you do, you will always sell 10-15 thousand, well, at least for collectors and exotic lovers.
    But it's there, and we live here.
    1. 0
      17 October 2023 16: 41
      no matter what you do, you will always sell 10-15 thousand


      Yes, but the problem is that you will get a very small profit on such a batch, which may not even cover the costs of development, testing, certification and setting up production.
  7. +3
    17 October 2023 08: 22
    ]For some, but for me, the Rino was considered a modern, beautiful and interesting revolver. (there is our Analog AEK-906) feature - the lower location of the barrel, which reduces recoil - in my opinion, the only ones in the whole world with such an arrangement were the Italians and we made them as an experiment. If I had the money and the extra desire to get a permit, I would buy it without hesitation
    1. Aag
      +5
      17 October 2023 09: 15
      Quote: Curt
      ]For some, but for me, the Rino was considered a modern, beautiful and interesting revolver. (there is our Analog AEK-906) feature - the lower location of the barrel, which reduces recoil - in my opinion, the only ones in the whole world with such an arrangement were the Italians and we made them as an experiment. If I had the money and the extra desire to get a permit, I would buy it without hesitation

      ...Not recoil, but barrel toss...
    2. +2
      17 October 2023 09: 33
      interesting design, you can feel the style.
      1. +3
        17 October 2023 12: 47
        Here's what you can turn the legendary Smith and Wesson into. request

        1. +3
          17 October 2023 13: 16
          Picatinny rail with engraving is something))
          1. 0
            17 October 2023 13: 21
            Picatinny rail with engraving is something))


            Here I am about that. smile
          2. +1
            27 October 2023 20: 38
            So the bar is removable. If I wanted to, I took it off.
        2. -1
          17 October 2023 18: 16
          Custom is the usual way) but here is a different design
        3. 0
          29 October 2023 16: 27
          In small things, although beautiful laughing
    3. 0
      17 October 2023 18: 18
      Our rhinoceros has been buried for a long time since 1999, in fact nothing has been heard about him
  8. +2
    17 October 2023 10: 38
    As I understand it, the author posted this note as an advertisement for his development. I wanted to piss off and piss off the client... I pissed off... fuck... on my own head. My opinion is that I would hold it, shoot it, but wouldn’t buy it as a hunting rifle. I have experience - I bought “Lynx” a long time ago. Now there is no space in the safe. Even the horizontal bars from Sauer are more interesting in the banks... Probably old age sneaks up on a cat's paws.. ehhehe
  9. +6
    17 October 2023 11: 15
    Revolver of the XXI century

    The author did not come up with anything new.

    Von Steiger revolver with automatic ejection of cartridges. Switzerland. XIX century. Since then, such designs have been created constantly and have not interested anyone.
    1. +6
      17 October 2023 12: 50
      Experimental model of a Colt revolver with automatic cartridge ejection. A strange tube soldered to the right of the barrel is a real gas outlet. The exact time of creation of the sample is unknown, but this prototype was created by the legendary engineer Robert Roy, who worked for Colt from 1963 to 1993.
      1. +6
        17 October 2023 14: 28






        1884 Silver & Fletcher automatic cartridge ejection device for the Webley RIC revolver.
        Like all previous and subsequent designs, this invention remained at the prototype stage.
        A certain Lepkov is clearly an amateur in the design of weapons, otherwise he would not have started creating a revolver pistol. There was already a similar homemade product on the site, advertising its radial guides under the guise of “an invention of the XNUMXst century.”
        In the history of weapons there were a lot of such Vintik and Shpuntikov. You can write a book.
        1. +2
          17 October 2023 16: 33
          Silver & Fletcher automatic cartridge ejection device for the Webley RIC revolver.

          Where did the cartridge fly out, into the shooter’s forehead?

          I agree with you about Lepkov.
          1. 0
            17 October 2023 16: 49
            Quote: Sea Cat
            Where did the cartridge fly out, into the shooter’s forehead?
          2. +2
            17 October 2023 18: 53
            Where did the cartridge fly out, into the shooter’s forehead?

            Towards the forehead. The manufacturer assured that everything was calculated and would not hit the forehead.
            1. +2
              17 October 2023 23: 44
              For some reason, not all the photos were published; the very first photo on the top model shows a casing that removes the cartridges from the shooter when shooting)
  10. +1
    17 October 2023 16: 51
    Did they make them so unergonomic on purpose?
    Or did it happen by accident?
    1. -2
      18 October 2023 00: 37
      Quote from: dump22
      Did they make them so unergonomic on purpose?
      Or did it happen by accident?

      I had a couple of revolvers. One is Chinese, the other is ours, Skat. The Chinese fell apart in half, and Skat’s trigger fell off.
  11. +2
    19 October 2023 21: 07
    Why is this all being done? So that a revolver can come any closer to a self-loading pistol in terms of performance characteristics? A revolver has only one advantage over self-loading pistols, and that is the ability to fire a shot after a misfire. All. Then he loses on all counts. I wonder what kind of drum drive this model has? I didn't understand this from the text. If the drum is also turned by the energy of powder gases, then this is completely junk. And the Bullpup system, which was invented only to usefully occupy the unused length of the butt and thereby lengthen the barrel or shorten the weapon itself, is generally a laughing stock for a pistol.
    1. -9
      21 October 2023 03: 11
      Hahaha what? Man, you should at least understand the topic before writing your opinion.
      The main advantage of revolvers is the ability to use large calibers (because they don’t fit in pistols). Why is there an option not to leave shell casings? After that, the reliability and reliability of the system (in general, this should be in 2nd place in importance, but pistols are now reliable if they are from normal companies, so they moved to 3rd). What do you think is the main thing + this was in the 18th century with capsule revolvers when each drum socket was loaded separately and then misfires were a common occurrence, so this is for you to broaden your horizons. With current ammunition, misfires and cartridge cases are not very common. But if you make cartridges yourself or use 1 cartridge case several times, then, of course, every 2 cartridges can be defective.
      So first understand the topic, and then write your opinion, otherwise you will only be disgraced.
      1. +3
        29 October 2023 10: 35
        Man, I've been in this thread since the late 80s.
        Find a revolver with a larger caliber than the AKP45, which would be more popular than pistols under 45 caliber.
        Do not leave shell casings, this is only necessary for criminal purposes and NO ONE develops small arms based on this.
        The “reliability of the system” of revolvers is pure fiction and legend. Semi-automatic pistols are absolutely not inferior to revolvers in this regard.
        The probability of misfire on modern cartridges is absolutely unimportant. The main thing is that it is there, and only in this case will the revolver be preferable, since for the next shot it will substitute ANOTHER cartridge, and not the same one, if the pistol can fire by self-cocking.
        So it’s better not to get involved in a topic where you only know about the “top people”
        1. 0
          31 October 2023 14: 32
          You are a gene. You criticize the designer without due respect... In their cooperative, it is for murderers that the trunks are designed by disabled Unified State Examiners, for them it is of utmost importance not to leave shell casings at the slaughter site, nor witnesses, but no more than 6 people at a time...
    2. -5
      21 October 2023 03: 24
      As for the bullpup, it’s also nonsense, it can be used in any weapon that uses a powerful cartridge to increase the accuracy and efficiency of arrows. This system is also needed to reduce the size of weapons, etc.
      That is, a bullpup is not needed in pistols since the barrel of a pistol chambered for the 9x19 cartridge is long enough. And in revolvers that most often use the 357 Magnum, which also powers hard drives, a bullpup may be suitable for increasing the efficiency of the cartridge.
      1. +4
        27 October 2023 10: 18
        That is, a bullpup is not needed in pistols since the barrel of a pistol chambered for the 9x19 cartridge is long enough.

        Do you know what is the optimal barrel length for the 9x19 cartridge? And under .45 ACP? What about the .50 Action Express pistol cartridge?
        The main advantage of revolvers is the ability to use large calibers

        Is your craft designed for a caliber larger than 12,7 mm?
        1. +1
          31 October 2023 14: 34
          The general designer is exclusively special in 357 Magnum, all the bones on the hands are broken...
      2. +1
        29 October 2023 10: 41
        The Bullpup system was created ONLY to maximize the use of the limited length of handguns, due to the length of the STOCK. Or lengthening the barrel while maintaining the dimensions of a hand-held small arms weapon that is used with a STOCK. Either they shorten the weapon with the butt without shortening the length of the barrel, or they lengthen the barrel while maintaining the dimensions of the weapon with the butt. ALL. If the weapon does not require a butt, then the bullpup system is idiotic. Therefore, no one in the world deals with such nonsense, except for one or two eccentrics.
    3. +2
      27 October 2023 17: 30
      For self-defense purposes. The revolver is perfect. Loaded, it can lie until the gunpowder and capsule turn sour from age. How long will a loaded magazine last? Lack of cartridges in old pistols, that's a hell of a deal.
      1. +1
        29 October 2023 10: 52
        Who would carry a pistol for self-defense without having it serviced for years? A far-fetched drawback that is unlikely to occur in practice. And carrying around this “weight”, which also has a drum that sticks out, instead of a compact, flat pistol, is such a task.
  12. +1
    27 October 2023 04: 22
    The revolver is the beauty of classics and reliability.
  13. +2
    27 October 2023 04: 44
    hat is analogue, it’s good that it will remain only in this article))) I can throw in a topic by the way... combat bows)) you buy 30 pound ones on Alika for 2 mowers apiece, you get good at it and sell it to suckers for 25
  14. +4
    27 October 2023 06: 08
    Another advertising article. Although this time the author signed.
    1. 0
      31 October 2023 14: 37
      Extremely primitive marketing... The style of disabled people on the Unified State Examination...
  15. +1
    27 October 2023 06: 46
    The main advantage of a revolver is its simplicity and reliability with an acceptable rate of fire due to the use of the shooter’s muscular strength, everything else belongs to an automatic pistol, and what I see in the article is couture nonsense.
    1. +1
      27 October 2023 10: 23
      through the use of the shooter's muscular strength

      There are automatic revolvers, such as the Mateba Model 6 Unica or the once produced Webley-Fosbery Self-Cocking Automatic Revolver, but they have not shown any advantages over automatic pistols.
  16. 0
    27 October 2023 07: 07
    There is a chic machine for powerful ammunition - MATEBA 6 unica - an automatic revolver with a lower barrel. It has a movable barrel with a frame, the drum rotates due to recoil...
    What is this miracle Yudo about?
    1. 0
      26 December 2023 07: 02
      The main feature and difference from these 3D crafts is that it exists and shoots
  17. +3
    27 October 2023 07: 48
    I don’t understand, now the hack about Lepkov’s “shooters” will be reprinted every week?
  18. +2
    27 October 2023 13: 01
    Ruger GP100 beautiful revolver
  19. +6
    27 October 2023 13: 44
    It is also impossible not to notice that this is the first full-fledged bullpup revolver in a pistol version. In third-party models, the drum was located above the handle, and not behind it, which can only be partially considered a bullpup layout.

    Lepkov - You are an ordinary liar. Moreover, it is arrogant, since “not only everyone” can lie so brazenly in the Internet era.



    Cherubin revolver, designer - Cherubin Luigi. 1880



    Revolver Zenk RZMK-357 from Zenk LLC. 2023

    Unlike your “shooters”, these are industrial designs.

    The site administration advertises an elementary plagiarist-liar.
    1. -5
      27 October 2023 15: 24
      This is more of a pistol layout than a boodle-pup because... the drum is not behind the handle good
    2. +1
      31 October 2023 14: 41
      No, he’s just an uneducated victim of the Unified State Exam... Nowadays there are a lot of “young and early” people like that... Saint Greta is an example of an ecologist...
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. +2
    27 October 2023 18: 43
    Business and nothing personal ....
    1. 0
      27 October 2023 20: 38
      Quote: denis88
      Business and nothing personal ...

      Or exploring the topic of mass-produced and cheap powerful weapons, the main details of which can be printed on a printer. From the examples presented, it is difficult to suspect a sophisticated design or a pursuit of technical beauty and perfection. If this is not how you want to attract a buyer, then cheapness and availability remain. This is a joke from overseas, and here you shouldn’t bother with a Russian surname. Who can invest in this? Those who want a mass shooting in the Russian Federation.
  22. +2
    27 October 2023 20: 38
    Yes, rare...
    I only remember the joke about the crow - which says at the end "... yes, I am a unique bird, I am a courageous bird, I am a strong bird - but completely fucked..."
  23. +5
    27 October 2023 22: 15
    Developing ugly revolvers is, of course, better than drinking vodka or substances use. But - not by much.
    There is no great harm. But there is no benefit.
  24. -1
    28 October 2023 12: 55
    interesting topic
    I would suggest working on the ergonomics of the revolver handles
    1. 0
      28 October 2023 16: 54
      So these are prototypes) of course the ergonomics will be improved good
      1. 0
        29 October 2023 11: 04
        All the “refinement” of this “ergonomics” will only result in attempts to compensate for it from the severe jamb of such a layout. An attempt to at least bring it closer to the ergonomics of normal layouts. And I’m almost sure that the ergonomics, as a result, will remain inferior to conventional pistols and revolvers. No one will use such a “cat-dog”. Maximum - they will buy it for a collection.
  25. +1
    29 October 2023 15: 41
    I have a question: in addition to the automatic firing mode in these units, the option of adding a mechanism for cutting off twos and threes is being considered, and if so, why?
    1. +1
      29 October 2023 16: 38
      Here the very meaning of having an automatic mode in a six-shot revolver is called into question. And the presence of a fixed queue mechanism in it will be the very apogee of “strangeness”. Although, after the Bullpup scheme in a revolver (!!), you can expect anything from this designer. In reality, even a belt feed for a pistol would look much more interesting wassat
  26. +1
    2 November 2023 12: 11
    If the point of revolvers is simplicity, why complicate it?
  27. +1
    2 November 2023 16: 05
    Total decadence. You pick it up and want to throw it away right away.
  28. +1
    2 November 2023 21: 06
    Quote: Passing by
    Why use long cartridges? For example, for underwater weapons. Or for a silent one, capable of penetrating higher-class armor and advanced helmets.

    Then the design of a bundel revolver, like Barr's revolver, would be better suited.
  29. +1
    9 December 2023 09: 05
    Some geeks. They resemble not military weapons, but children's pistols. All that remains is to paint it in rainbow colors.
  30. 0
    26 December 2023 06: 59
    On the thingiverse there are models of such blasters, for 3D printing, and carriages. And they look more beautiful. At least I could print different parts in different colors, but it’s probably too time-consuming and complicated on his ender.
  31. 0
    22 January 2024 16: 16
    It's better to see once than to hear a hundred times...
    Auto RU:
    Couldn't you include at least one video in the article????
    And even imagination is not enough.
  32. 0
    22 January 2024 16: 59
    This concept is a model range of three options that meet all the requirements of modern shooters and hunters.

    A horse screamed - this is where in Russia revolvers are allowed for hunters, even if they are of such a bastard...sorry, bastard type? laughing
    The RL “Country-M” (mini) model is a small-sized revolver for concealed carry, sport shooting and self-defense.

    Is this really about Russia? Are we already allowed to use firearms for self-defense? Come on... wassat
    Also in the Russian adaptation the traumatic version of this weapon is considered.

    “Trauma” with us is actually a song - I bought myself a term, because... you shoot with a rubber band of 0.3-0.5 grams, and they will judge you as if you were using a weapon. And the judge will add another sentence for using an “injury” of just such a “bastard” type.
    PS Is it really possible that these developers are smoking so wildly that they hope to push such a monster onto the arms market (which in reality we don’t have at all)?..
  33. 0
    April 1 2024 16: 00
    Wars are not won with pistols and revolvers, even super advanced ones.
    True, they are beginning, as shown by the example of Gavrilo Princip in Sarajevo.
    Let me remind you that Gavrila had 9 mm. The Browning Model 1910 was a very advanced pistol for those times.