Development of US strategic missile defense

31
Development of US strategic missile defense
Aegis Ashore complex in Romania


Since the beginning of the XNUMXs, the United States has been actively building and developing a national missile defense system. To date, a number of different types of facilities have been deployed on American territory and beyond its borders, responsible for surveillance, detection of threats and interception of dangerous objects. In addition, right now the construction of new means and systems is underway, which in the near future will have to complement defense in the most important strategic directions.



European direction


Ostensibly to protect against the Iranian nuclear missile threat, the United States and other NATO countries recently began building a Euro-Atlantic missile defense system. It now includes several main components designed to defend the eastern flank of the Alliance. New construction is also underway.

The most numerous and mobile component of the Euro-Atlantic missile defense system are American Arleigh Burke-class destroyers with the Aegis BMD missile defense system. They are permanently based in the Spanish port of Rota and can use other NATO bases. In addition, in 2016, the Aegis Ashore missile defense system, based on ship components, began combat duty at the Romanian airbase Deveselu.

In the mid-2018s, construction began on another European complex, Aegis Ashore. They decided to place it at the Redzikowo base in Poland. According to the initial plans, construction was supposed to take just a couple of years, and already in XNUMX they wanted to put the complex on combat duty. It was assumed that the presence in Eastern Europe of two facilities with detection radars and anti-missile defenses would seriously improve NATO’s defense against the “Iranian missile threat.”


Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Paul Ignatius (DDG-117)

However, these plans could not be fulfilled. Construction in Poland has faced a variety of problems. In 2018, it became clear that it could not be completed on time, and the completion of the complex was postponed for two years. In 2020, a new transfer took place, again two years to the right. The work schedule was last revised in 2022, and now the launch of combat duty is expected before the end of 2023.

Apparently, the Missile Defense Agency and its contractors have managed to overcome all the problems and difficulties. Not so long ago, in August, the agency announced that plans to launch the new Aegis Ashore complex during 2023 are still relevant. There are less than three months left until the end of the year, and it is not yet known whether the remaining work will be completed in time, or whether the commissioning of the facility will be delayed again.

In the Pacific Ocean


A number of American strategic missile defense facilities and formations have already appeared in the Asia-Pacific region. According to the official version, this was done to protect the United States and its allies in the region from possible aggression from the DPRK or China. At the same time, the development of the nuclear missile potential of these countries is still used as a reason for the deployment of new systems and facilities.

And some American ships with the Aegis BMD missile defense system are serving in the Pacific Ocean. Several ships of the Japanese Maritime Self-Defense Force have similar equipment. There is also a ground defense component in the form of THAAD complexes in South Korea and on the island. Guam. It should be remembered that American stationary missile defense systems are also deployed near the Pacific region.

However, not all the desired means can be deployed in the region. Thus, in 2017, Washington and Tokyo agreed to build two Aegis Ashore complexes on Japanese territory. Preparations for construction took several years, but in mid-2020 it was abandoned for a number of different reasons.


Launch of an SM-3 rocket by a carrier ship

Shortly thereafter, the Pentagon announced the possible construction of such a complex in Guam. As it was later reported, the THAAD products available on the island do not fully correspond to the existing and expected threat level. In this regard, it is necessary to build and put on duty a more advanced Aegis Ashore system.

According to the 2020-21 plans, the new missile defense component can be completed and put into operation no later than 2026. Construction began in 2021-22. and is already giving the first results. To date, the bulk of the structures have been built and a lot of targeted equipment has been installed. In mid-August, the first switching on of the complex's standard radar took place. By the end of next year, the Aegis Ashore complex on Guam will be completed and ready for testing. The first test firing is planned for December 2024.

On your own territory


The first component of the US strategic missile defense system brought to combat duty in the first half of the 40s was the GMD complex. The radar and the first positioning area for the launchers of this complex were located at the Fort Greely base (Alaska). Soon similar facilities were built at the Vandenberg base in California. Two bases host more than XNUMX GBI interceptor missiles.

It is assumed that the GMD/GBI system is no longer fully responsive to current threats and challenges. In this regard, construction of a new position area with 20 additional launchers is currently underway at the Fort Greely base. The commissioning of this facility will increase the number of GBI missiles on duty by almost one and a half times. However, construction is behind schedule, although not as much as other important projects.


Land missile defense system THAAD

Another way to develop the GMD system is to develop new ammunition. The GBI anti-missile missile has a number of shortcomings and no longer meets all current requirements. In this regard, the design of a promising NGI missile with improved characteristics and, presumably, with several kinetic interceptors on board has begun.

It is interesting that the NGI project is progressing more successfully than other works and gives reason for optimism. According to the initial plans, such an anti-missile missile was supposed to go into production and reach the troops in 2028. Not so long ago it was announced that the schedule was shifting to the left - deliveries of products would begin in 2027. Whether such promises will be kept, or the schedule will return to its original form, time will tell.

In the process of development


The United States continues to develop its strategic missile defense. In key areas, objects and systems of various kinds have already been built and deployed, responsible for observing, searching and intercepting targets. In addition, the construction of new facilities of this kind continues or begins, new types of equipment or ammunition are being developed, etc.

It is not difficult to imagine how the American missile defense system will change based on the results of the implementation of current projects. Thus, in the Eastern European direction, anti-missile forces and means will actually double. The new Aegis Ashore facility will increase the overall visibility and control area. At the same time, the attention of the two missile defense systems, as expected, will be directed not at Iran, but at Russia.

It should be remembered that the Aegis Ashore system is suspected of having undeclared capabilities. Being a modification of ship systems, it is, at least in theory, capable of using not only anti-aircraft missiles, but also strike ammunition. In this case, the facility in Redzikowo will also improve the strike potential of the US Army.


GBI rocket launch

Construction of the same facility is underway on the island. Guam. This time they do not hide the true purpose of creating the complex - they plan to use it to confront China. Changing conditions in the Asia-Pacific region also affect the development of the GMD complex. In the coming years, the number of its missiles will increase by almost one and a half times.

It is easy to see that the development of the American strategic missile defense system in recent years has been mainly due to an increase in the number of facilities and means. This approach ensures the gradual creation of defense in all key directions, as well as bringing its quantitative indicators to the required level.

It is noteworthy that such military construction processes use complexes and systems created at least several years ago. The development of promising models is already underway, but at the moment they are not ready for use by the troops. They will begin to be deployed only in the second half of the decade - provided there are no problems.

Today and tomorrow


Thus, the United States remains committed to creating a large and advanced strategic missile defense system that protects it from all major directions and from all expected threats. To achieve this, various measures are being taken, both independently and in cooperation with other states. Over the past decades, significant progress has been made in this direction, and there are no plans to stop work.

However, the construction and development of missile defense faces characteristic problems. Thus, the creation of new facilities and the deployment of the required systems is associated with large expenses. At the same time, not all construction projects can be completed on schedule and with all the desired results. In addition, the potential of the missile defense systems under construction also raises questions. Nevertheless, work continues, and this year the Missile Defense Agency plans to report on new successes.
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -6
    7 October 2023 05: 21
    The American THAAD is so far the best missile defense system in the world.
    The impact head of an air defense missile system destroys warheads with a kinetic hit.
    1. 0
      7 October 2023 06: 22
      Of course, if the world is limited to the Western bloc.
      The only thing that the Americans really surpassed us with was their massive numbers.
    2. -4
      7 October 2023 07: 01
      Quote from Omega option
      The impact head of an air defense missile system destroys warheads kinetic hit.
      request There is no such thing as a kinetic hit.
      kinetic damage - the result of exposure to objects of kinetic energy, leading to their loss of ability to function as intended
      request Yes, it will go against the Scuds. fool Read WIKI, which you wrote:
      THAAD (English Terminal High Altitude Area Defense [θæd], read. “Ted”,[1] earlier name of the English Theater High Altitude Area Defense) - a mobile ground-based anti-missile system for high-altitude transatmospheric interception of medium-range missiles[
      Weapons for pygmies against pygmies. request
      1. 0
        7 October 2023 08: 28
        If it were for the pygmies, then the locations of the Ukrainian Armed Forces buildings would have been bombed long ago.
        1. +3
          7 October 2023 13: 03
          Quote from Omega option
          location of the APU buildings.

          THAAD is not there. And they are not needed, the Patriot’s capabilities are enough.
          1. -4
            7 October 2023 13: 40
            Patriot only defends himself with varying degrees of success, what kind of corps of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are there?
            1. +1
              7 October 2023 13: 49
              Quote from alexoff
              Patriot only defends himself with varying degrees of success, what kind of corps of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are there?

              If there are only enough Iskanders for patriots and village drinking parties, and there are no left for the Ukrainian Armed Forces corps, then, in principle, the issue of missile defense has been resolved successfully.

              Another thing is that I have not yet seen any “corps of the Armed Forces of Ukraine”. They have disappeared somewhere.
      2. +1
        7 October 2023 13: 02
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Weapons for pygmies against pygmies

        Current allies were involved. No matter how much you have to apologize to Comrade Xi, not to mention Comrade Kim.
    3. -2
      7 October 2023 13: 01
      kinetic hit. it's five. in memoriz!
  2. 0
    7 October 2023 05: 31
    The Americans have the best shipborne air defense systems for transatmospheric destruction.
    1. -1
      7 October 2023 07: 14
      Quote: Omega option
      The Americans have the best shipborne air defense systems for transatmospheric destruction.

      Did your wife say that? request
      1. +2
        7 October 2023 08: 26
        Russia does not yet have a sea-based missile defense system.
        1. +2
          7 October 2023 12: 40
          Quote from Omega option
          The Americans have the best shipborne air defense systems for transatmospheric destruction.

          Quote from Omega option
          Russia does not yet have sea-based missile defense

          Just write that the US Navy is so far the only one armed with ships equipped with extra-atmospheric air defense systems. And remember why the United States decided to place such missile defense systems on ships - to create remote missile defense lines. For Russia, such needs are not relevant; we have ground-based missile defense based on the A-235 and S-500, as well as the S-400, which approximately corresponds to the capabilities of TXAD to intercept medium-range ballistic missiles. The S-500 is already two heads taller and does not need to be placed on the ship at all.
          But of course no one will argue that the United States is still the “Queen of the Sea”. Until China challenges it.
          1. -2
            7 October 2023 12: 56
            Quote: bayard
            Just write that the US Navy is so far the only one armed with ships equipped with extra-atmospheric missile defense systems

            And Japan. I think it was still YK, I don’t remember.
            Quote: bayard
            also S-400, which roughly corresponds to the capabilities of TXAAD to intercept medium-range ballistic missiles

            There is not a single reliable case of the S-400 operating against IRBMs, much less ICBMs or orbital objects.
            Quote: bayard
            The S-500 is already two heads taller and does not need to be placed on the ship at all

            S-500 does not exist.
            1. -1
              7 October 2023 13: 41
              Quote: Negro
              S-500 does not exist

              THAAD does not exist
              1. +2
                7 October 2023 13: 46
                The same organization where Konashenkov is a lieutenant general tells us about the S-500. Other sources about THAAD.
            2. +2
              7 October 2023 19: 55
              Quote: Negro
              And Japan. I think it was still YK, I don’t remember.

              In principle, yes, but they have it imported.
              Quote: Negro
              There is not a single reliable case of the S-400 operating against IRBMs, much less ICBMs or orbital objects.

              This is indicated in its characteristics and purpose. The S-400 is being exported and none of the buyers have denied its declared characteristics. China conducted test firing and officially announced that the S-400 fully confirmed its declared characteristics.
              Quote: Negro
              especially ICBMs or orbital objects.

              Nobody talked about this.
              Quote: Negro
              S-500 does not exist.

              I may disappoint you, but the S-550 also exists (exclusively an anti-missile modification of the S-500 created by order of the KSA). And the S-500 is mass-produced, delivered to the troops and mastered there.
              1. 0
                8 October 2023 13: 48
                Quote: bayard
                This is indicated in its characteristics and purpose. The S-400 is being exported and none of the buyers have denied its declared characteristics.

                Buyers most likely did not read its “declared characteristics”. These are stories for internal use.
                Quote: bayard
                China conducted test firing and officially announced that the S-400 fully confirmed its declared characteristics.

                Yeah. Tests were carried out against high-speed, high-altitude aerodynamic targets, as well as against the 96M6M, which is a high-mars projectile, plus or minus.
                Quote: bayard
                And the S-500 is mass-produced, delivered to the troops and mastered there.

                I can believe that Comrade Chemezov is delivering something with such an index. This manner is known precisely from the history of the “early modifications” of the S-400.
                1. +1
                  8 October 2023 16: 03
                  Quote: Negro
                  Buyers most likely did not read its “declared characteristics”. These are stories for internal use.

                  When you buy an expensive, complex durable item, do you do the same?
                  In addition to China, India is also currently purchasing the S-400, for which the anti-missile capabilities of this complex are very important. I would even say - vitally important. Because Pakistan has both missiles and nuclear weapons, and their relations regularly balance on the brink of war.
                  Quote: Negro
                  I can believe that Comrade Chemezov is delivering something with such an index. This manner is known precisely from the history of the “early modifications” of the S-400.

                  An order has been received for 10 regimental sets. Bye . Some kind of fine-tuning during the start of military operation is also possible, this always happens. And that's okay. But at the moment, at least one regimental set (most likely two, but I have nothing to confirm) enters the troops every year. Now work in this segment (air defense systems) has been sharply accelerated, production volumes are increasing. And the multifunctional AFAR radar from the S-500 is now being supplied for the re-equipment of already deployed S-400 divisions with it. Such a replacement will further expand the capabilities of the S-400, incl. in work on ballistic and hypersonic targets. Well, the duration of continuous operation of such a radar is many times longer than that of the standard S-400 PFAR radar.
                  Quote: Negro
                  Comrade Chemezov is supplying something there

                  In any case, I can’t make any special complaints about the air defense systems in the RF Armed Forces - during the air defense system, the air defense copes with its tasks, all air defense systems confirmed their characteristics in real use. And complaints always happen with new equipment that has just been put into service. It was like that before.
                  1. -1
                    8 October 2023 22: 43
                    Quote: bayard
                    In addition to China, India is also currently purchasing the S-400, for which the anti-missile capabilities of this complex are very important.

                    It has no anti-missile capabilities. But the complex from the 80s is still better than nothing. India is exactly at the level of the latest innovations of the USSR. Su-30, T-90, Kuznetsov, etc.
                    Quote: bayard
                    Because Pakistan has both missiles and nuclear weapons, and their relations regularly balance on the brink of war.

                    There is no “brink of war” there, just like with China. Soldiers from nuclear powers fight each other with sticks. To amuse the brave prowess.
                    Quote: bayard
                    And the multifunctional AFAR radar from the S-500 is now being supplied for the re-equipment of already deployed S-400 divisions with it. Such a replacement will further expand the capabilities of the S-400

                    Yes Yes.

                    Just as the S-400, until the 10s, was essentially an S-300 PMU with a re-sawed design of the control panel, so your S-500 is an S-400 with a supposedly different radar. The big question is whether it exists: the Soviet government was not strong in radio electronics, and the current one even less so.
                    Quote: bayard
                    During the air defense system, the air defense copes with its tasks

                    During the Northern Military District, the fraternal people coped with the air defense tasks, having plundered their army below sea level for 30 years. If in the place of the Armed Forces of Ukraine there had been any “active” army of the third world, say the Yemeni Houthis, the North Military District would have happened much differently. Especially for Muscovites.
                    1. 0
                      9 October 2023 15: 33
                      Quote: Negro
                      Just like the S-400, until the 10s, it was essentially an S-300 PMU with a re-sawn control panel design,

                      With a new radar and new\new long-range missiles. And yes, this is a further development of the S-300. Just like in the USA, "Patriot" has been developing all these years. But the S-400 is better.
                      Quote: Negro
                      so your S-500 is an S-400 with a supposedly different radar. Which big question is whether there is:

                      It exists, take note. And this is a completely different air defense system with a predominantly anti-missile focus. Other algorithms, another powerful radar with a detection range of ballistic and hypersonic targets at a range of up to 1200 km. at the appropriate height. Which can also be used in the S-400 missile defense system. And the main problem was the creation of such a radar. It was created. And S-400 divisions are already being re-equipped with it to increase combat capabilities.
                      And in terms of missile defense, it is unified with the A-235. So for ICBMs it’s quite possible. Of course, with target designation from early warning systems. This is already a regional missile defense system against missiles of any class.
                      Quote: Negro
                      The Soviet government was not strong in radio electronics, and the current one even less so.

                      The USSR lagged behind the USA in electronics by 5, maximum 7 years in some areas. And it wasn’t in development that there was a lag, but in implementation - it’s just that the newly launched new production facilities and technical processes had to pay off. In the USA, the issue of payback was resolved by the widespread introduction of personal computers and consumer electronics in general into life and the expanded export of it. We were careful with this. Therefore, many developments and technical processes waited for their implementation for those same 5-7 years, and by the time they were introduced, they sometimes turned out to be not at all advanced. But they could well have followed the path of the United States in introducing the latest electronic components into the everyday life of Soviet citizens and the entire CMEA market, and thus would have expanded and retained much more markets in this area. It was not even the quality of management, but sabotage and preparation for the surrender of the country. This has nothing to do with the development itself. All modern microelectronics are based on the patents of our scientists, incl. Zhores Alferov. Incl. technology for growing multilayer heterostructures and an X-ray lens for lithographers. Now, using these technologies, a plant is being built for the production of such 7-nanometer lithographs and production lines for the production of chips using this technology.
                      Quote: Negro
                      During the Northern Military District, the fraternal people coped with the air defense tasks, having plundered their army below sea level for 30 years.

                      These people spent 8 years restoring Soviet air defense systems left over from the 3 best Soviet military districts. They were preparing for this. And the used air defense was not completely destroyed not because of its perfection, but because of the weakness/small number of Russian combat aviation, a weak satellite constellation and a small number of specialized reconnaissance, target designation and radio suppression aircraft. Now these problems are being solved, the number of aerospace forces is growing, new weapons are saturating the troops, and a satellite constellation is being deployed. b\U is too large territorially for a blitzkrieg with small forces and the towers had a serious miscalculation in the calculation of the escape of the 95th quarter. A protracted conflict was not included in the plans and was not provided with resources and the size of the group. And of course supplies from the USA and NATO. Well, let's play the long game. In any case, the Russian economy is doing much better and suffered much less than the economies of Western countries during this period. Industry and the military-industrial complex began to grow rapidly in Russia. Despite the serious drawdown in the passenger car industry, the total growth of industrial production is about 8% per annum.
                      Quote: Negro
                      If in the place of the Armed Forces of Ukraine there had been any “active” army of the third world, say the Yemeni Houthis, the North Military District would have happened much differently. Especially for Muscovites.

                      Well, the Sumerians tried to spoil the blood of Muscovites and, in general, trade in terrorism and sabotage. But counterintelligence also works, and quite effectively. and there is no war without losses. We are not fighting one-on-one with the used ones, but with all of NATO and Co. That’s why restraint in means - everything about NATO must be kept in mind. But Russia is growing in strength and capabilities every day, gaining new allies and partners, but somehow this is not observed among the sponsors of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Used ones have no prospects. In addition, there is again a war in Palestine, the Arab Street demands the anti-Israeli consolidation of the entire Arab and Islamic World... and no one is dispersing it or condemning it, all leading non-Western countries are calling on the warring parties to show restraint and negotiations... and to recognize the state of Palestine with its capital in Jerusalem. The IDF, of course, had a strong army, but Israel itself is a small state... and all around is the raging Arabian Sea.
                      Russia, of course, has nothing to do with this... but I think China will not mind at all if the United States now goes out of its way to help Israel. I won't mind at all.
                      Ukraine, of course, will be against it, because at its expense (aid will be cut or stopped... or Ukraine will be blamed on the EU and NATO). But who will ask her?
        2. -3
          7 October 2023 13: 03
          you're too fat a troll, it's not even funny.
    2. 0
      25 January 2024 11: 58
      You can't argue with that. But even this does not at all guarantee the interception of a satisfactory number of targets. With a massive attack, 80 percent will break through. So all these super anti-missiles are good against single launches.
  3. 0
    7 October 2023 09: 30
    Dear author, in every article you are so worried about whether the West will find financial resources, whether it will fit into the plans, whether everything will work correctly and whether it will be effective, that sometimes I get the impression that you are openly rooting for them and keeping your fingers crossed crossed so that they will succeed. soldier
    1. 0
      7 October 2023 12: 58
      Quote: Little Bear
      Dear author, in every article you are so worried about whether the West will find financial resources, whether it will fit into the plans, whether everything will work correctly and whether it will be effective

      Well, at least someone is working and not telling fairy tales.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. +2
    7 October 2023 15: 51
    There is such a thing as a fast day - a day on which, according to church rules, it is not allowed to eat meat and dairy foods.
    There is an urgent request to the editors of the site - let's implement such days on the site. Let these days, preferably Saturday and Sunday, be absent from the “humble” authors - Ryabov, Mitrofanov, Samsonov and others like them.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. +1
    7 October 2023 17: 39
    According to US experts, the missile defense system, even in the form of SDI, that is, with 4 position areas and a space component, guaranteed the interception of about 20% of targets in a massive strike, according to the most optimistic forecasts. Our estimates gave a more modest result - 10-15%. That is why SDI has always been considered a preparation for aggression. After all, only a pre-emptive disarming strike made this entire extremely expensive system any meaningful. After all, the concept of the US missile defense system is based on the extremely controversial idea of ​​intercepting warheads. And this is equivalent to trying to shoot down one bullet with another bullet.
    In subsequent years, the US tried to come up with something smart and move on to intercepting carriers, but they mostly ended up with “laser Boeings”. As a result, the system is in dire need of early start detection. The fourth US missile defense position area, located in the countries of the former Warsaw Pact, is responsible for this. It is the radars located there that, in theory, should detect the launches of our missiles and provide primary data to computers located in Britain, which in turn will provide primary target designation to missile systems in the United States. Only with this data will interception systems in the United States be able to intercept warheads.

    That is, the US has never built ANY European missile defense system. Yes, they chatted a lot and loudly shook hands with all sorts of European vassals. But all the interception equipment deployed in Europe is needed by the US to ensure the operation of the fourth and third position areas of the US missile defense system, at least until the necessary data is sent to the States. No one intends to defend Europe. Moreover, the US withdrawal from the INF Treaty showed that they do not care at all about the interests and security of Europe and they only need “allies” as a way to reduce the number of missiles we sent to the US in a retaliatory strike.

    Let me remind you that today Russia has at least 1500 (and according to the hysterical estimates of Western “analysts” there may be more than 1600) warheads in a deployed state. No Tadads and Arliburks will intercept such a pack. The only hope for the United States was and remains the first strike. It is precisely this that is the main means of US missile defense.
    1. +1
      8 October 2023 13: 44
      Quote: abc_alex
      It is the radars located there that are supposed to detect the launches of our missiles

      You're delirious. Most of the trajectories go through the Arctic Ocean; a radar in Romania is unnecessary there.
      Quote: abc_alex
      I remind you that today Russia has at least 1500 in its deployed state (and according to the hysterical estimates of Western “analysts” there may be more than 1600)

      These are the numbers prescribed in START-2. Where you find “hysterical analysts” is up to you.
      Quote: abc_alex
      No Tadads and Arliburks will intercept such a pack. The only hope for the United States was and remains the first strike. It is precisely this that is the main means of US missile defense.

      Yes, a preventive counterforce strike will greatly facilitate the missile defense task.
      1. 0
        8 October 2023 15: 45
        Quote: Negro
        You're delirious. Most of the trajectories go through the Arctic Ocean; a radar in Romania is unnecessary there.

        Europe is exactly the place for radars tracking transpolar routes. In addition to those already operating in the northern NATO countries.

        Quote: Negro
        These are the numbers prescribed in START-2. Where you find “hysterical analysts” is up to you.

        Well, there is such an organization: the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), which frightened us in the summer by the fact that the number of deployed nuclear warheads in Russia as of January 2023 increased from 1588 to 1674. In the USA, this number increased from 1744 to 1770.
        1. 0
          8 October 2023 22: 27
          Quote: abc_alex
          Europe is exactly the right place for radars tracking transpolar routes

          Radar from Romania does not see Orenburg. Yes, even Saratov can’t see Ivanovo. By the time the northbound rockets emerge from the radar horizon in Romania, the satellites will have long since been used up.
          Quote: abc_alex
          he scared in the summer that the number of deployed nuclear warheads in Russia as of January 2023 increased from 1588 to 1674. In the United States, this number increased from 1744 to 1770.

          Who did he scare with this? National Interest Magazine?
  9. 0
    8 October 2023 19: 59
    Russia’s logical response would be to increase the obvious and imaginary number of carriers with the ability to overcome missile defense (hypersonic, overload), as well as the ability to destroy deeply buried objects, not allowing peace to settle in the souls of mattress pads and gay Europeans. The sword must always hang over their heads. Well, the Voronezh station, of course, needs to be completed wherever planned, and the detection satellites need to be brought to the required number. You need to prepare carefully and thoroughly for World War 3, then perhaps it will not come...