Evolution of domestic self-propelled ATGM platforms

41
Evolution of domestic self-propelled ATGM platforms
The 2P26 combat vehicle from the 2K15 "Bumblebee" complex, which was in service with the NNA of the GDR. Photo: Wikimedia Commons


In the early sixties, the first domestic anti-tank missile systems entered service with the Soviet army. In order to improve their combat qualities, the issue of placing them on self-propelled platforms was almost immediately worked out. Subsequently, this area received great development, and self-propelled ATGMs became one of the most important components of the armored vehicle fleet. At the same time, the evolution of platforms for ATGMs and changes in requirements for them are of great interest.



The first experiments


The first ATGM of the Soviet army was the Shmel product, which was put into service in August 1960. Already at the development stage, it was decided to place this complex on a self-propelled chassis. First, one of the available vehicles was used in this capacity, and then they created a protected version of the combat vehicle on a different platform.

The first version of the Shmel, the 2K15 complex, used a 2P26 type combat vehicle. It was built on the GAZ-69 chassis and was distinguished by fairly high cross-country ability. Four guides for launching missiles were placed in the body of the car; there was no room for additional ammunition. In the stowed position, the beams with missiles were placed vertically and covered with an awning. Before using weapons, they were lowered to a small angle. The cockpit housed the rocket control equipment.


2P32 vehicles of the 2K8 Phalanx complex at the parade. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

In the early sixties, the army received a new 2K16 “Bumblebee” complex with an improved 2P27 combat vehicle. This product was built on the basis of the BRDM-1 armored vehicle, thanks to which the crew and missiles received protection from bullets and shrapnel. The vehicle received a retractable launcher with three guides. In the stowed position, it was located inside the aft compartment of the hull. Before firing, the roof of the compartment opened and the installation moved out. The possibility of horizontal aiming was provided. Control was carried out from the operator's seat in the cabin.

The 2P32 combat vehicle was built in a similar way for the self-propelled version of the 2K8 Phalanx complex. It differed from 2P27 only in the design of individual devices and other control equipment. Also based on the BRDM-1, the 9P110 vehicle of the 9K14 “Malyutka” complex was built. Its retractable launcher carried six missiles; another eight were inside the hull. The armored roof of the fighting compartment was placed directly on the launcher and rose with it.

New platform


In 1962, a new reconnaissance and patrol vehicle BRDM-2 entered service, which was also considered as a potential carrier of various weapons and systems. Anti-tank missiles were no exception, and by the end of the decade, self-propelled anti-tank systems appeared in the army at a new base.


Museum vehicle 9P110 of the Malyutka-M complex. Photo Vitalykuzmin.net

The first to appear was the 9P122 combat vehicle with the Malyutka-M complex. From the point of view of the composition of weapons and their placement, it did not differ from the previous 9P110. This time, the launcher with six guides and an upper armor cover was placed in the central compartment of the hull. There were also mounts inside for 8 additional missiles. The control equipment corresponded to the new Malyutka-M project.

The BRDM-2 was considered a successful platform for ATGMs, and at the turn of the sixties and seventies, several new self-propelled systems appeared with common layout and technical solutions. Thus, the 9P133 combat vehicle carried the “Malyutka-P” complex, and the 9P137 carried the 9K8P “Flute” product (a modernized “Phalanx”) with an ammunition load of 8 missiles.

In the mid-seventies, the 9P148 vehicle of the 9K111-1 “Konkurs” complex entered service. Unlike its predecessors, its launcher was located on the roof of the hull and could not be removed inside. The installation had mechanisms for guidance in two planes, and five transport and launch containers with 9M113 missiles were attached to the swinging part. The total ammunition included up to 15 missiles, depending on their model.


9P148 combat vehicle with Konkurs missiles. Photo Vitalykuzmin.net

Heavy platform


Since the late fifties, our country has been developing the IT-1 “missile tank” with the 2K4 “Dragon” anti-tank system. Unlike other self-propelled ATGMs, IT-1 was not a simple combination of ready-made elements. A significant part of such a complex, including the rocket and related equipment, was developed from scratch.

The basis for IT-1 was the T-62 medium tank. They took the hull, power plant, chassis and turret cap from him. The fighting compartment was almost completely given over to the mechanisms of the Dragon complex. A launcher with the ability to aim in two planes was placed on the roof of the tower. There was only one 3M7 missile on the installation at a time. Ammunition - 12 missiles.

During testing and operation among the troops, the IT-1 tank and its weapons performed well and confirmed their design characteristics. At the same time, the vehicle had a number of disadvantages in the form of an unreasonably large mass, outdated components, etc.

Lightweight version


In the mid-seventies, development of a self-propelled version of the 9K114 Shturm ATGM began. This combat vehicle was created taking into account the experience of designing and operating all previous self-propelled systems on different platforms, up to the Dragon. The developers of “Sturm” took into account all the positive reviews and complaints, as a result of which they were able to find the optimal concept - which is still in use today.


Tank IT-1 in the Patriot park. Photo Vitalykuzmin.net

The 9P149 combat vehicle for 9K114 was made on the basis of the MT-LB multi-purpose tractor. A tracked platform of this type had high maneuverability in all conditions, as well as sufficient load capacity and capacity. At the same time, the bulletproof and anti-fragmentation armor was fully consistent with the intended use tactics and threats.

The missile system units are located in the rear chassis compartment. The vehicle received a lifting launcher with guidance drives and mounts for a TPK with a missile. Inside the body there is a mechanized stowage unit for 12 9M114 missiles. Preparation for launch is carried out automatically, at the operator’s command. The radio and electronic components of the ATGM used for control are located in the front part of the body, next to the operator’s seat.

The next domestic self-propelled ATGM 9K123 "Chrysanthemum" was built on the chassis of the BMP-3 infantry fighting vehicle. Like previous models, this complex received a lifting launcher and internal stowage with a TPK, as well as a set of various radio-electronic equipment. At the same time, “Chrysanthemum” is distinguished by a launcher for two missiles and carries 15 TPK. It is possible to use missiles of various modifications with a choice before preparing for launch.


Complex 9K114 "Sturm" on the MT-LB chassis. Photo by the Russian Ministry of Defense

The same BMP-3 was used to create two versions of the 9K135 Kornet self-propelled complex. The 9P161 and 9P162 combat vehicles are equipped with two launchers, each of which uses one missile. There are also controls, automatic loading, etc. In addition, it was proposed to install such a combat module on other platforms, such as the BTR-80.

Modern armored car


During the development of the Kornet ATGM, Russian industry several years ago returned to the ideas used several decades ago - but implemented them on a new basis and using modern developments. Thus, due to the creation of new launchers, it has again become possible to install missiles on existing armored vehicles.

Several launchers-combat modules have been developed for the Kornet ATGM, such as 9P163-2 Quartet, 9P163-2 Quartet-M or 9P163-3. Each of them carries four missiles and has an optical-electronic system. In addition, the design allows the module to be removed inside the body of the carrier machine.


Complex "Chrysanthemum". Photo KBM

Various options for using the 9P163 series modules were demonstrated and proposed, but the most famous was the Kornet-D complex in the form of a Tiger armored car with two 9P163-3 launchers. Such a vehicle has a ready-to-use ammunition load of eight missiles; The same amount is located inside the case and can be installed when recharging. Two modules are capable of simultaneously attacking different targets.

Ways of development


Installing an ATGM on one or another carrier provides obvious advantages. Therefore, from the very beginning, in domestic projects of anti-tank systems, the possibility of creating a self-propelled modification was explored. Moreover, some of them were originally created in this form, and a wearable modification was not provided. Subsequently, the direction of self-propelled ATGMs received great development.

It is easy to see how the customer and project implementers chose platforms for deploying ATGMs. In each project of this kind, a modern and affordable serial model of equipment with sufficient characteristics was used. In most cases, they tried to do without radical restructuring of the original design. The only serious exception was the IT-1 “missile tank”. However, in this case we are talking about a fundamentally unique model, different from all other domestic and foreign developments.


Self-propelled ATGM "Kornet-D" based on the "Tiger" on Red Square. Photo by AP RF

The very first domestic self-propelled ATGM was made on the basis of an army vehicle. The result was a combat vehicle with an acceptable level of firepower, but virtually no protection. Based on the experience of its operation, in the future the complexes were built only on protected chassis. At the same time, for a long time, a number of projects used compact and lightweight equipment - BRDM of two models. Now this idea is being used again in the Kornet-D project.

However, the MT-LB and BMP-3 can be considered the best ground-based platforms for anti-tank missiles. Due to their relatively large size and carrying capacity, they are capable of carrying missiles of various sizes and weights, including the largest and heaviest models, such as 9M114 or 9M123 from the Sturm and Khrysantema. Accordingly, such a self-propelled complex shows the highest performance.

In recent years, the domestic industry has presented several new versions of modern self-propelled systems, built on current platforms and using the latest model missiles. It is obvious that the process of developing such technology will continue further. It is unclear what promising ATGMs will be in the distant future, but it can be assumed that the experience of today's projects and their best ideas will be used in their creation.
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    29 September 2023 04: 16
    “missile tank” IT-1 with the 2K4 “Dragon” anti-tank system.
    What the use of this machine in battle might look like is described in the magnificent trilogy "Iron Wind. The Path of War. Where the Earth Burns." I.I. Nikolaev.
    1. +1
      29 September 2023 05: 32
      I've never even heard of such a work. I should have asked.
      1. +3
        29 September 2023 14: 44
        Third-rate fantasy about a loser, not worth it
        1. 0
          29 September 2023 17: 22
          Quote: IImonolitII
          Third-rate fantasy about a loser, not worth it

          Fantasy? Are you a fool?
  2. 0
    29 September 2023 04: 24
    It is necessary to develop a BM with a guide placed in the front of the machine.
    1. +3
      29 September 2023 09: 38
      In theory, installing a vertical launch suggests itself, but this is a completely different ATGM, and not even quite an ATGM, since reconnaissance equipment (UAV, radar and UAV+radar on board), a system for transmitting coordinates from any ground sources, etc., implies slightly different organization of application...
      IMHO hi
  3. +4
    29 September 2023 04: 29
    It would be nice to have an armored lance carrier. In general, a couple of years ago, a new ATGM was considered to be an armored installation of the “chrysanthemum” type with something very similar to LMUR, “Baikal” was called
    1. +3
      29 September 2023 08: 35
      Quote from alexoff
      It would be nice to have an armored lance carrier. In general, a couple of years ago, a new ATGM was considered to be an armored installation of the “chrysanthemum” type with something very similar to LMUR, “Baikal” was called

      Why does the Lancet need an armored carrier? With its operating range, defeat by small arms or light cannon (20-30 mm) weapons is almost impossible... the main dangers are artillery, various kamikaze drones and DRGs...
      1. +2
        29 September 2023 19: 13
        Even thin armor will increase the survivability of the crew if a projectile falls nearby or a drone arrives. The experience of the Northern Military District shows that aircraft must be protected even 500 km away, and even more so 10 km from the front
  4. +4
    29 September 2023 05: 36
    It would be nice to develop and have a BM ATGM with a platform that can rise five to seven meters, similar to emergency vehicles for repairing power lines, which would allow them to be used from behind shelters, such as a house, hill, trees
    1. +5
      29 September 2023 07: 09
      It would be nice to develop and have a BM ATGM with a platform that can rise five to seven meters, similar to emergency vehicles for repairing power lines, which would allow them to be used from behind shelters, such as a house, hill, trees

      A complex mechanism, any hit will jam.
      I think with the development of UAVs, and in the future UAVs carrying ATGMs, ATGM carriers moving on the ground, if they do not die out, will lose their significance and will be used to a limited extent.
      1. +2
        29 September 2023 07: 35
        There is nothing complicated. Beam with hydraulic drive. At the end is a self-stabilizing platform. On the same Tiger you can put 3,5 meters. On MT LB and more subdinner it is possible. Easier to disguise. There is no need to substitute for work. The variability of firing positions is increasing, which means it will be more difficult to detect such equipment with UAVs.
        1. +3
          29 September 2023 07: 50
          There is nothing complicated. Beam with hydraulic drive.

          When I wrote about complex things, I didn’t mean engineering performance, but just protection from hits. Hydraulics are small in volume, technologically advanced, but not durable on the battlefield, mechanics are durable (the same screw jack is an eternal thing), but weight, volume and a bunch of other shortcomings on the battlefield.
          1. 0
            29 September 2023 19: 53
            If there is one hydraulic cylinder that will lift the beam and if it is located, roughly speaking, inside the U-shaped beam profile, then it will be as durable as the equipment itself. All the most important things will be in the center of the building.
      2. +3
        29 September 2023 11: 50
        Quote: Arkadich
        A complex mechanism, any hit will jam.

        I don’t agree about the particular difficulty, but so what if it jams? When folded, it will be an ordinary combat vehicle, but what are the possibilities...


        Jagdleopard lifting platform for HOT anti-tank missiles
    2. +5
      29 September 2023 11: 34
      Quote: svp67
      It would be nice to develop and have a BM ATGM with a platform that can rise five to seven meters, similar to emergency vehicles for repairing power lines, which would allow them to be used from behind shelters, such as a house, hill, trees

      Ohhh... here we go again. ©

      The last decade of the Cold War. Germany and Britain and France, which joined later, are developing a lifting module with a universal ATGM-missile guided missile (at the first stage they installed NOT-3) to combat hordes of Soviet tanks and helicopters at a range of 10-12 km. It was planned to install the module both on the MBT chassis and on cheaper wheeled platforms.
      1. 0
        29 September 2023 23: 49
        And what didn’t suit them in the end, since they curtailed it?
        1. 0
          2 October 2023 11: 12
          Quote: Sunrise
          And what didn’t suit them in the end, since they curtailed it?

          So the enemy is over. While R&D was going on, the Cold War ended - and the threat of hordes of Soviet tanks and helicopters disappeared. But for the “peacetime” of the 90s, the complex turned out to be expensive and redundant.
  5. 0
    29 September 2023 05: 50
    One of the areas of self-propelled ATGMs is the Terminator BMPT. This machine is two in one, both against infantry and against tanks. If you install a locator, it will also work against low-flying targets and the UAV will work like the Chrysanthemum. Designers might want to think about this. soldier
    1. +3
      29 September 2023 06: 09
      Controversial decision. After all, the Terminator is a vehicle with heavy armor and is supposed to work in the first line. And there all the locators will quickly be swept away
      1. -2
        29 September 2023 06: 39
        What line does Chrysanthemum work in? With a maximum destruction range of 7 km. In a vehicle with heavy armor, this is a big plus for protecting the crew; people are the most important thing in any circumstances. soldier
        1. +6
          29 September 2023 07: 12
          What line does Chrysanthemum work in? With a maximum destruction range of 7 km

          It works in the first, but to an extremely limited extent. All the same, her work is either from an ambush, or jumped up, shot, and jumped back.
        2. 0
          30 September 2023 13: 28
          Quote: V.
          What line does Chrysanthemum work in? With a maximum destruction range of 7 km. In a vehicle with heavy armor, this is a big plus for protecting the crew; people are the most important thing in any circumstances. soldier


          It is generally not for operating in the same line with tanks. This is a defense and ambush vehicle.
          1. 0
            30 September 2023 21: 06
            If for defense, then why has nothing been heard about its use during the current offensive of the Ukrainian Armed Forces?
      2. 0
        29 September 2023 11: 57
        Quote: Gagrid
        Controversial decision.

        This is exactly the solution that simply suggests itself, but for this you need to do two things:
        - we need 30mm shells with programmable detonation
        - create a unified command information field.
        Then any detected drone will be destroyed by a “sheaf” of fragments 100...200 meters ahead of the tanks, BMPT, to which the initial information and command will come from a single center, where information from all radars, both air defense and reconnaissance, will flow, on this section of the front.
        The latter is especially difficult, but it is already possible, in any case, there are developments in this area, it remains to resolve the issue of organizing mass production of equipment, training and testing
    2. +1
      30 September 2023 13: 42
      This is a delusion carrier, not a fighting machine. Open ATGM ammo rack? Do you think that the rocket is cast from a whole piece of cast iron? :) Getting hit by shrapnel or 12,7 bullets on the ammunition rack will already make the use of missiles risky. The ATGM TPK is designed for transportation and quick installation, and not for protecting the missile in combat. It's good if the rocket just flies in the wrong direction. It may jump right at the moment of start. There is a close gap in the 155-mm HE and you can forget about the use of ATGMs. I assure you that the KBM did not remove the missiles from a hangover inside the vehicle under the armor.

      Terminator locator? And wings for flight :) Who will manage all this and how? The first BMPT had a crew of 6 people. In T-2, grenade launchers and 2 people were removed. But I can’t imagine who is now responsible for what in it and how. The driver is understandable. Commander - understandable. One for all artillery including cannons and machine guns and one for ATGM?

      Heavy self-propelled ATGM systems do not need guns on their heads. They need new means of communication and intelligence. For example, the same “tethered” reconnaissance drone is a repeater with a lifting height of at least 20 meters above the vehicle. This will already increase the horizon range to 12-15 kilometers. Nowadays, the range of missiles is not limited by their flight range. And the range of confident control is beyond the horizon. Even the Attack rocket confidently flies 7-8 km. To fight tanks that cannot see further than the horizon, this is already a safe distance. But controlling the rocket at such a distance is already hampered by the same horizon and terrain.
  6. +2
    29 September 2023 07: 53
    We would like a complex with a retractable bar, but there is a German one that raised it above the trees and let it go. Since there are no missiles, I fired and forgot.
  7. 0
    29 September 2023 08: 13
    It would be interesting to install a retractable installation with “Cornets” on an infantry fighting vehicle of the “Manul” type. The engine is in the front, but... it is very low, there should be a lot of space above it - you can put the ATGM under the armor above the engine, in front of the turret.
    The current arrangement of expensive ATGM missiles on the combat module is vulnerable to snipers and shrapnel.
    1. -1
      29 September 2023 15: 48
      On the BMP-3 (armored personnel carrier) the shell was made long ago by the Cornet..
  8. 0
    29 September 2023 08: 31
    The "Konkurs" launcher is retracted inside.
  9. +3
    29 September 2023 08: 58
    Something is not particularly visible from the SVO, the new ATGMs. Type Cornet-D. On the tiger, which.
  10. +1
    29 September 2023 09: 20
    Chrysanthemum and Sturm (if possible) need modification to use Product-305 LMUR on them. Given the almost complete lack of armor, they should be able to launch LMUR missiles from protected positions far from the target.
    You may have to use a standard repeater drone to reliably transmit to the operator the image from the rocket’s television head, as well as the operator’s control actions back.
    1. 0
      29 September 2023 15: 47
      I think that it is necessary to restore order in the supersonic ATGM segment and leave one Whirlwind....and make variations based on it.
    2. 0
      30 September 2023 13: 46
      Quote: Yuri77
      Chrysanthemum and Sturm (if possible) need modification to use Product-305 LMUR on them.

      Connection. Problem with the rocket. From a helicopter it is “visible”, but from an infantry fighting vehicle it is 5 km and the horizon. Is it possible to ask Musk to provide Starlink's powers? :)
  11. 0
    29 September 2023 09: 30
    The article is informative in terms of history, but the ATGM has no future. Their function during the SVO was quickly taken over by UAVs. Which don’t even need special transporters. I loaded a full body of guides from a UAV into, for example, a KAMAZ and took it where needed. Brought and left, the operators continue to work, they are not visible in the enemy’s field of view. But the carrier, after all, d.b. armored - enemy artillery, UAVs, etc. They are unlikely to sleep.
    1. +1
      29 September 2023 15: 45
      They will not be able to take away the work from the ATGM. ATGM is a more universal and all-penetrating tool. Up to 5-6 km you can’t replace it with anything. The power and versatility of the warhead is unrivaled.
      Even if we take Israel as an example, they get along with both Spike and drones like Hero...
    2. 0
      29 September 2023 19: 18
      This is a question for ATGM manufacturers - a drone with a grenade is technically more complex than an ATGM. It’s just that drones have learned to produce millions, and the fundamental differences from a rocket are the engine and flight speed
    3. +1
      30 September 2023 13: 50
      Quote: Eragon
      Their function during the SVO was quickly taken over by UAVs.


      Why did you decide that? There are simply more “videos” from drones on the Internet. ATGMs do not have video cameras with relay; after all, these are initially weapons, not a rattle toy.
      1. 0
        2 October 2023 11: 17
        Quote: abc_alex
        ATGMs do not have video cameras with relay; after all, these are initially weapons, not a rattle toy.

        They install it and use it. It’s just that we haven’t reached this generation of ATGMs yet.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. -3
    29 September 2023 16: 32
    Quote: Gagrid
    I've never even heard of such a work. I should have asked.

    Read Berkam Al Atomi, "Marauder, Punisher".
    It is very likely that the history of our country follows the same path as described in these books.
    1. 0
      29 September 2023 18: 17
      I read and read. Even 10 years ago. The author does not like Russians very much. He also told a few stories, but he couldn’t get through them all.