Loitering ammunition "Scalpel" and its prospects

37
Loitering ammunition "Scalpel" and its prospects
UAV "Scalpel" on the launch guide


Recently, the Russian defense industry, represented by large organizations and newly created enterprises, has been actively developing a variety of unmanned aerial vehicles. aviation complexes, including loitering ammunition. Recently it became known about another project of this kind: the Ryazan design bureau “Vostok” presented and launched the Scalpel UAV for testing.



Promising platform
The Vostok design bureau was founded by a group of enthusiasts not so long ago, but has already developed and offers customers several types of UAVs with different functions and capabilities. Now the organization's main efforts are focused on the Scalpel project, the goal of which is to create a lightweight unmanned platform with the functions of a loitering munition.

The TASS agency reported on the first successes of the Scalpel project on September 7, citing representatives of the developer organization. The new UAV/BB has successfully completed flight testing and is demonstrating its capabilities. However, the progress, tasks and results of such tests have not yet been reported.

The Vostok design bureau is also preparing the Scalpel complex for testing by the troops. Already in October, such equipment will be sent to an unnamed part of the armed forces participating in the Special Operation to protect Donbass. At the same time, the new UAV has already attracted the attention of potential operators - the development organization has received applications from several departments for the supply of such equipment.

The design bureau plans to continue work on the Scalpel. In order to further improve the design, a dialogue has been established with representatives of the armed forces. The Army is helping to clarify the tactical and technical requirements for drone. Also, KB Vostok receives assistance from the administration of the Ryazan region and DOSAAF.


Fuselage without planes before assembly

As TASS writes, in order to further develop the project and production, KB Vostok is collaborating with the ANO Platform of the National Technology Initiative and the Aerospace Innovation Valley STC. It is expected that such interaction will further reduce the share of imported components in the Scalpel design.

Carrier drone


The Scalpel product is positioned by its creators as a multi-purpose unmanned platform for disposable use. In essence, we are talking about loitering ammunition, which has all the characteristic features of equipment of this class. At the same time, the project from the Vostok design bureau provides for a modular approach to the combat load used - this is what allows us to consider the UAV / BB as a platform.

Externally and in its design, the Scalpel is similar to the domestic Lancet UAV and some foreign models. The main components of the device are located in an elongated fuselage, to which two sets of X-shaped planes are attached externally. The exact dimensions of the drone have not yet been announced, but we can talk about a length of at least 1-1,2 m and a body diameter of more than 125-130 mm. Take-off weight – 10,5 kg.

An electric motor with a pushing propeller is located in the rear part of the fuselage. The device also accommodates batteries of optimal size and capacity. Cruising speed – 120 km/h; higher speed is possible. The range is determined to be 40 km.

The architecture and principles of operation of the onboard control systems have not yet been reported. The UAV probably has a remote control system and an autopilot for operating in different modes. Direct control in flight is carried out using rudders on the rear set of planes.


The “scalpel” must carry a warhead, and the use of different types of charges is allowed. A load weighing up to 5 kg is placed in the internal compartment of the fuselage with a diameter of 125 mm and a length of 650 mm. The crew of the complex can independently select and install any ammunition or charge of suitable size and weight, available and/or best suited to the task at hand.

The UAV is delivered to the customer disassembled in a container of the smallest possible size. Immediately before launch, planes are installed on the fuselage and other operations are carried out. "Scalpel" takes off using a catapult with a long guide; the starting impulse is created by rubber bands. Landing is not provided - the BB must hit the target.

Characteristic Benefits


The new Scalpel UAV/BB is similar in appearance and architecture to existing models. At the same time, it has its own characteristic features and advantages. In some parameters and capabilities, it clearly outperforms other domestic BBs. Plus, it reportedly has an "affordable price tag."

The greatest interest in the Scalpel project is the modular approach to combat equipment. In a sufficiently large cargo compartment it will be possible to place warheads of different types and for different purposes. First of all, this will increase the flexibility of the unmanned platform and allow it to effectively hit a wider range of targets. In addition, the operator will be able to select warheads taking into account its current capabilities and the availability of ammunition.

“Scalpel” also has fairly high technical characteristics and in some respects surpasses existing samples. Thus, the maximum payload of 5 kg is more than 45% of the launch weight of the drone. For comparison, the heavy version of the serial Lancet has a warhead weighing 3 kg, which is 25% of its weight.


General view of the product in flight configuration

Flight performance characteristics are quite sufficient to solve all major combat missions. “Scalpel” can hit targets at depths of up to tens of kilometers, and the flight to the maximum distance takes no more than 18-20 minutes, after which the UAV can begin patrolling and search for targets. In terms of range and speed, the Scalpel is inferior to some other modern warheads, but this is fully compensated for by other design features.

In general, the Scalpel product is not a competitor to the Lancet. Two BBs with similar but different characteristics and capabilities should be used together and complement each other depending on the situation. So, in some situations the Lancet with a standard warhead will be useful, while in others a more heavy-duty Scalpel with independently selected suitable combat equipment will be needed.

Information about the economic and operational features of the new UAV is of great interest. It has a reasonable price, and from the point of view of application it is no more complicated than existing analogues. As the design develops, production expands and is optimized, the cost of the equipment may further fall. In theory, this will allow the supply of more drones to the troops.

During testing


In recent months, the Russian army has been actively using loitering ammunition in the Special Operation zone, and they are demonstrating their potential and combat qualities in the most obvious way. It is obvious that the BB direction has the greatest future, and many organizations want to join its development. The Scalpel project from KB Vostok is a good example of this.

The Scalpel UAV/BB is built on the basis of well-known ideas and using new solutions, due to which it should show high performance and broad capabilities. Right now, the finished aircraft are undergoing factory tests, and in the coming weeks they will be transferred to the front. There they will be able to demonstrate their potential in combat conditions. Based on the results of such events, further decisions will be made.
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -19
    22 September 2023 04: 31
    In a sufficiently large cargo compartment it will be possible to place warheads of different types and for different purposes. First of all, this will increase the flexibility of the unmanned platform and allow it to effectively engage a wider range of targets.
    recoursePampering. The more warheads, the greater the efficiency, the rest is blah blah.
    Additionally, the operator will be able to select warheads taking into account their current capabilities and availability of ammunition.
    Blah blah, but in reality, “whatever you miss, you don’t have” request
    1. 0
      22 September 2023 19: 46
      I look at the photo, give these guys free rein, they will screw on 6 more pairs of wings... We, born to fly, don’t have enough wings
  2. +7
    22 September 2023 04: 49
    So why create competition? Aeroscan is rapidly expanding the production of lancets, new modifications of which are on the doorstep; they would better offer their help and their sites. They say - let’s produce cumulative fragmentation warheads for lancets! We also want to make lancets, so we have a huge workshop/shopping center waiting for you! Or they would come up with some niche of their own, for example, a copter with a 120 mm mine, which could drag this mine to Zaporozhye and there drop this mine directly on the fuel depot, and then return home. Otherwise, disposable is of course good, but reusable the same money - a hundred times better!
    By the way, with all these kamikazes, serious reconnaissance drones have been lost somewhere, for some reason we can’t come across footage of Orions, which have been riveting in three shifts for a year now, nothing about Altair at all. And the latter, with the stated characteristics, could clearly see enemy missiles and drones with its AFAR, especially over the sea
    1. +16
      22 September 2023 09: 50
      Yes, we really need to produce more, competition has not been canceled! So the same lancets (not very cheap) will be forced to lower the price tag, not to mention faster technical improvements.
      1. +1
        22 September 2023 15: 01
        Usually in our country, competition leads to more problems, competition begins in dumping with kickbacks, which ends in bankruptcies and corruption.
    2. +6
      23 September 2023 00: 12
      This is not a competitor to X's! This is a much cheaper tool with a smaller working radius. And it’s done by guys who are desperately short of lancets (I communicate with them all the time and the most common complaint is “we’re saving the lancets, so the dill are getting impudent and they’ve been working with artoi from one position since the fall of 2022”)!
      1. 0
        23 September 2023 02: 41
        Well, they have a control system for this pepelats, why don’t they attach a signal repeater to this system, bigger wings and a more powerful battery so that it flies for a couple of hours to direct FPV ghouls for 15-20 km, which cost 40 thousand? So the bitches won’t have any art left, and the lancets will catch all sorts of self-propelled guns in the depths
        1. 0
          23 September 2023 23: 14
          Can you tell me the frequency range of the amplification, and what are the batteries made of?
        2. 0
          27 September 2023 09: 08
          why not attach a signal repeater to this system?

          this is a very difficult task,
          The FPV operator uses highly directional antennas with a high gain for the video signal, he aims them at the drone, if you change the direction a little, the signal will disappear,
          In order to make a retransmitter on a drone, there should also be such antennas and they should always be directed towards the source of the signal from another drone, how do you imagine such a design?

          it is possible to do this, but it will be expensive and difficult, for the same money it is easier to make drones with a satellite dish, which also needs to be rotated so that it is aimed at the satellite, but its range is not limited at all, even 1000 km
          and prototypes of these are already being made in Russia

  3. +7
    22 September 2023 05: 04
    Two BBs with similar but different characteristics and capabilities should be used together and complement each other depending on the situation.

    Yes. at least three!!! In our business, the main thing is the presence of reconnaissance UAVs capable of calculating targets and transmitting data about them to operators of attack warheads.
    And we, like half a century ago, have problems with the transfer of operational data and management.
    It seemed simpler, he prepared the operator, gave him the coordinates of the targets and let him “hit” everything that moved. The main thing is to be effective... And sometimes when watching a video you get the impression that they are working for the public... To hell with it - whether the destruction process gets into the frame or not - there would be a result.
  4. +1
    22 September 2023 05: 04
    Two BBs with similar but different characteristics and capabilities should be used together and complement each other depending on the situation.

    Yes. at least three!!! In our business, the main thing is the presence of reconnaissance UAVs capable of calculating targets and transmitting data about them to operators of attack warheads.
    And we, like half a century ago, have problems with the transfer of operational data and management.
    It seemed simpler, he prepared the operator, gave him the coordinates of the targets and let him “hit” everything that moved. The main thing is to be effective... And sometimes when watching a video you get the impression that they are working for the public... To hell with it - whether the destruction process gets into the frame or not - there would be a result.
    1. -5
      22 September 2023 05: 18
      .And sometimes when watching a video you get the impression that they are working for the public...To hell with it - it will hit or not

      and they’ll stick on a pretentious headline, but look closely: “something exploded nearby”... either they think we’re complete idiots, or the authors of such videos and headlines themselves are not very smart!
  5. +4
    22 September 2023 06: 51
    Why is there such a shift in interest towards disposable UAVs?
    On the one hand, it is clear that even a parachute system will make the structure heavier.
    On the other hand, it will allow, if necessary, to launch a reconnaissance aircraft without a UAV.
  6. +5
    22 September 2023 07: 27
    We are at the very beginning of the journey of unmanned aircraft, which means we won’t see anything in the near future. There will be freaks and cuts and very successful ideas, only time will weed out the unnecessary and show who was right. The main thing is that things went well!
    1. 0
      16 November 2023 09: 26
      “We are at the very beginning of the path of unmanned aircraft”...

      And the Banderaites have had drones since 2014, our soldiers “who weren’t there” in the Donbass shouted about this, but no one in the Defense Ministry heard them, there was no communication and there is no one, everyone is busy with the Chinese baofengs, in fact there is no order in the army, There are many saboteurs and saboteurs in the ranks of the Defense Ministry who occupy high positions and are not responsible for anything. If we had these BBs working as they should and in the proper quantities, then there would be no shelling of Donbass, everything would have been destroyed long ago, and the shelling, as it was, is still intensifying, there is no counter-battery fight, there is no way to save Bandera’s troops from artillery and drones in the positions, losses huge, they don’t tell by the visor, but whoever was at the front knows when they will stop selling the army?
  7. +1
    22 September 2023 07: 47
    do not read
    write the author at the beginning of the article!!!!
    1. The comment was deleted.
  8. +5
    22 September 2023 08: 50
    I have long “dreamed” of such a drone... so that the operator could select and install the desired ammunition (warhead) before launch! (I was thinking about how this could be done with a “lancet”...there are options) But I had broader wishes! 1. The ability to install not only warheads, but also equipment (for example, a repeater)... 2. Change the seeker too... 3. The ability to drop warheads and return “home” (loitering ammunition with the possibility of returning <BBVV>) 4. Apply launch rocket boosters for launch, which will allow the use of light compact launchers 5. Development of “verticals”; 6. Use compact aerofinishers to “land” returning aircraft launch drones for reuse... (There are sketches of such systems... R&D code: " Flycatcher" wink ) For all the points listed above there are “sketches” of options....
    1. 0
      16 November 2023 09: 33
      Nobody needs your “sketches”, no one will ask you for them, and BB is done to make money, not to win, the times are over when people lived and died for an idea, now they live and die for the sake of money, nothing personal, just profit and under this you can do whatever you want, including crimes, but all this is under the brand of patriotism, and the most important patriots with billions from high stands tell the poor what patriotism and love for the motherland are, while selling everything to enemies, just to cut down more, this is our life...
  9. +4
    22 September 2023 09: 08
    I’ll explain to those who are not happy what exactly a loitering UAV is good for. The first and perhaps most important thing is art, both counter-battery combat and, under certain conditions, its replacement. The second is the simplicity of both the design itself and its use. The third is accuracy. The fourth (in terms of design and functions) is modularity. Fifth, reconnaissance is a strike, a method when one UAV shows the target to others. This is not counting the fact that it is much easier to train and equip such UAVs. What I would like to add from myself is that I expect and hope for the development of a UAV fighter
    1. +2
      22 September 2023 11: 52
      So, where are the optics in this product, did you notice? did you see it at the Lancet?
      In other words: the device presented here can never be compared with the Lancet; its ability to “loiter” and accept a target by its similarity in the matrix is ​​highly questionable.
  10. +2
    22 September 2023 09: 18
    So, in some situations the Lancet with a standard warhead will be useful, while in others a more heavy-duty Scalpel with independently selected suitable combat equipment will be needed.

    To be honest, I don’t understand - 5 kg is always better than 3, with a comparable range... request
    But, in any case, it’s good news - there are more UAVs/BBs, good and different fellow
    Or vice versa - unify, increase output multiple times and bring down the price? wink
  11. +7
    22 September 2023 09: 26
    Comrades, don't worry, this article is just an advertisement.
    And there is no competition in UAV production now. The reason is simple - there is a catastrophic shortage of them. At least an order of magnitude, and for me, two orders of magnitude. And first of all, the simplest and cheapest ones, for the front line. They can be made, and I do even from paper, if there was a warhead of the necessary power.
    There are different goals. Strategic and tactical. Strategic goals with drones won’t be much of a nightmare yet - hit the Geranium on the factory floor, so what? Repair will take a couple of days at best. There are no missiles here yet. And the front line needs to be filled with any drones. The stupid ones will quickly disappear on their own. But, again, there are very few of them now. Therefore, increase production at any suitable production capacity.
    1. +2
      22 September 2023 10: 47
      I wonder, is it possible to make a compact “head” that points the UAV at a source of electromagnetic radiation? If possible, then you can remove communications, radar, etc.
      1. +2
        22 September 2023 15: 06
        For vortices they made a passive ARGSN, but it is quite large and most likely will cost several times more than the drone itself. It’s better to mount such equipment on a reconnaissance UAV so that it can target something cheaper. Even artillery
  12. +3
    22 September 2023 12: 01
    The article is so incapable of hiding the projection that I even looked at the calendar - is it still possible to get money for this?!
    a) this is not a competitor to the Lancet line, they are a generation ahead in R&D and practice analysis
    b) this is not even a loitering power supply unit - it will not be able to operate offline, and the work of a duo with intelligence is presented too dreamily, i.e. not even in the first project, but sometime?
    c) the declared shift of warheads is just beautiful words. Without a real process of testing the fuse, the release system, etc., talking about a universal carrier is a fraud. Moreover, I would like to note that this project has already implemented alternatives, namely, “Oko” sawed down exactly the same thing from plywood. But it will definitely be cheaper and definitely already in the army.
    Conclusion: Design Bureau "Vostok" reminds me of "Tsar's Wolves" in depth and ambition.
  13. +4
    22 September 2023 12: 37
    Has anyone tried installing a resettable “power bank” on the BB to increase the range, or at least the time spent in the air?
    1. -1
      22 September 2023 18: 51
      To increase the flight range and duration, you can reduce the combat load and thereby increase the battery! For example, put a 1 kg warhead and more batteries! In the reconnaissance version, you can do without a warhead altogether, and take its place with additional batteries! But you need to have TV and TPV cameras!
    2. +2
      22 September 2023 19: 55
      Usually the problem is not the batteries, but the communication range and, to a lesser extent, the price of the batteries. Zala reconnaissance drones can fly for hours, but video communications of more than 50 km show only large samples of 30 kilos and above
      1. 0
        24 September 2023 15: 55
        there is a possibility that a repeater has appeared for 50+50 strikes
      2. 0
        24 September 2023 20: 17
        who is stopping you from flying a repeater drone to a height of 1 km?? So you can fly 200 km...
        1. 0
          25 September 2023 20: 17
          So, that’s the trouble with all this private project-making, that it is in no way integrated into the system. digital data transmission bus for network-centric warfare in conditions of jamming and destruction of terminals in the LBS zone - was this task seen somewhere in science fiction novels of the 60s? - does it mean that if there is no such project from the past, then they won’t plan it?
          When they write about this as a fact that happened, it was introduced into the next type of weapons, the public grins and clicks through the fix, remembering that only we have everything that is the most advanced and proven by the experience of our ancestors. I have twice observed such a curtailment of discussions at VO.
          Total: competent setting of tasks and effective implementation are “compensated” according to Chubais, i.e. "We'll buy from them."
          In other words: the Russian Federation has a chance to fight the 90s by switching the dial to “for the sake of survival, for the sake of the Northern Military District,” and then there will be the same blizzard from the “economic bloc” of national traitors - the creation of conditions that are far from the rational design of the future.
    3. 0
      23 October 2023 17: 04
      Quote: Dmitriy22
      Has anyone tried installing a resettable “power bank” on the BB to increase the range, or at least the time spent in the air?

      There was this idea for an electric glider: it rises in a spiral to a height, drops the battery from there by parachute, then glides to its destination. Yes, it seems like they discussed it here at VO.
      Good idea for a kamikaze drone.
  14. 0
    22 September 2023 20: 04
    Fine. Competition will not hurt in this area.
  15. +1
    23 September 2023 18: 24
    The range is determined to be 40 km... Cruising speed is 120 km/h... a flight to maximum distance takes no more than 18-20 minutes, after which the UAV can begin patrolling and search for targets

    Nothing is clear - how long can he loiter in search of a target?
  16. 0
    24 September 2023 15: 54
    Well, let's see, many people laughed out loud at the Lancet in 20-21, but that's how it turned out.
  17. 0
    23 October 2023 16: 57
    Plus, it reportedly has an "affordable price tag."

    This is good. We need a million IDP drones every month. Moreover, with BB from 100-200 g, but a lot.
  18. 0
    19 December 2023 18: 47
    BB Scalpel will be supplied to the Vostok Khodakovsky battalion...