Cumulative effect of Academician Lavrentiev

30
Cumulative effect of Academician Lavrentiev
Mikhail Alekseevich Lavrentiev


Mathematician and mechanic


By the beginning of the Great Patriotic War, Mikhail Alekseevich Lavrentiev was already a world-famous scientist. A bit of great and terrible mathematics from the track record of the future academician: "descriptive set theory", "homeomorphism continuation theorem", "quasi-conformal mapping theory" and much more. But Lavrentiev was not limited to theoretical mathematics - a considerable part of the works has a quite tangible practical application. For example, in 1934, the scientist publishes a theorem in which he proves that the wing profile in the form of arcs of circles or Zhukovsky's bow has the maximum lifting force. It sounded like "extremal problem of the theory of conformal mappings". Lavrentiev worked for some time aviation questions at the Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute in the group of Sergei Chaplygin. The scientist later recalled:



“From my work at TsAGI, I took out for myself, firstly, the experience of applying pure mathematics to important engineering problems and, secondly, a clear understanding that in the process of solving such problems, new ideas and approaches are born in the mathematical theories themselves ... You can safely argue that this is what brought our country to the forefront in the field of aviation technology.


Future Academician Mikhail Alekseevich Lavrentiev

In the mid-30s, the scientist became twice a doctor of science - first technical, and later - physical and mathematical. Academic degrees are awarded to Lavrentiev without defending a dissertation on the basis of "the totality of scientific merit." In the future, a skillful combination of mathematical theory and practical results became Mikhail Alekseevich's trademark. Just before the war - in 1939 - Lavrentiev was appointed director of the Institute of Mathematics of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR in Kyiv. At the same time, the scientist does not lose touch with Moscow and remains a professor at Moscow State University.

The evacuation to Ufa posed purely practical tasks for the mathematician - now there were no civilian problems, all topics related to the defense industry. Lavrentiev took up the theory of explosion, first of all, the hydrodynamic theory of cumulation. It is immediately necessary to clarify that the cumulative effect that turned military science upside down in the 30s is not Lavrentiev's discovery. The phenomenon was discovered in the second half of the 1914th century. and for the time being did not find an intelligible explanation. Indeed, it was very difficult to understand how covering a recess in an explosive with a steel sheath and removing the charge from the piercing body increases the penetration effect. But this did not prevent the use of the cumulative effect, albeit limitedly, in mining. The first patent for cumulative ammunition dates back to XNUMX, but the real heyday of technology happened only in World War II. For the most part, cumulative shells were developed on empirical data - no country in the world had a coherent theory. Lavrentiev writes in this regard:

“Although anti-tank cumulative shells were already used by the Germans in the battles for Stalingrad and these shells were copied and studied in England, the USA and here, there was no exact understanding of the physical basis of their action until 1945.”

However, the theoretical research of Mikhail Alekseevich concerns the late period, and in Ufa purely technical tasks awaited him. The main development was aviation cumulative bombs. Here is an excerpt from the book by Yuri Yergin, the biographer of the academician and the first rector of the Bashkir University:

“Instead of several heavy hundred-kilogram anti-tank bombs (PTAB), the IL-2 attack aircraft took on board four cassettes with 78 PTABs each, with which they literally “sprinkled” German Tanks from a height of 25 m, which ensured, on the one hand, greater aiming accuracy of such a bombing strike, and on the other hand, the complete safety of the aircraft itself, which could not be shot down by the explosion of its own bombs. The PTABs had another great advantage. Unlike conventional air bombs made of expensive high-strength steel with a complex fuse, PTABs could theoretically be produced even in a wooden case. Hence the possibility of their manufacture not at specialized factories, but under the most primitive conditions, as happened in Ufa ... "

Lavrentyev's PTABs were produced in Ufa on the Prommetiz artel evacuated from Dnepropetrovsk. The final refinement of the design of the ammunition and the fuse AD-A was made by Ivan Aleksandrovich Larionov.


Each bomb weighed 2,5 kg and pierced up to 70 mm of armor with a cumulative pestle. This was enough to defeat the most protected tanks of the Wehrmacht - the Panther had no more than 16 mm in the roof, the Tiger had 28 mm. It's no joke, Lavrentiev came up with roof-piercing ammunition long before they became mainstream. For the first time, PTABs from Ufa were used in the Battle of Kursk, and they had a very worthy effect on the Nazis - several hundred tanks were destroyed by air strikes.

Here in Ufa, Lavrentiev deals with a wide range of problems that are not directly related to cumulative effects. Contemporaries of the scientist recall:

“At the same time, scientists are studying the problems necessary for practice on the durability of aircraft engine valves, projectile belts, new ideas in creating weapons... Another important area of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbmechanics ... was the study of the stability of the movement of solid bodies with liquid filler in relation to artillery tasks.

Interestingly, even in the difficult conditions of the evacuation, Lavrentiev does not give up mathematics and publishes a work on "solvability of the problem of solitary waves on the surface of an ideal fluid". But the main forces, of course, took away questions of a defensive nature.

Cumulative theory


In Ufa, Lavrentiev began work on the hydrodynamic theory of a cumulative explosion, and continued in Moscow and Kiev from 1944. It was a strictly secret topic - the first open publications in the world press appeared only in 1948. In the mid-40s, there were two theories explaining the cumulative effect - the armor burning scheme and the spalling scheme. In accordance with the first, a jet of gas pierces the armor, the second implied a breakdown with hot metal dust. Lavrentiev empirically proved the failure of both approaches and offered the theory of liquid jets as an explanation. To do this, it is necessary to assume that the copper lining of the cumulative projectile and armor are essentially incompressible liquids, albeit very viscous ones. Lavrentiev subsumed the dynamic model of an incompressible fluid under the hypothesis, and it turned out that it surprisingly explains the entire physics of a cumulative explosion. But some were funny. Mikhail Alekseevich recalls:

“The idea that a metal behaves like a liquid has been called ridiculous by many. I remember my first speech about this at the Academy of Artillery Sciences was greeted with laughter ... The hydrodynamic interpretation of the cumulation phenomenon was supported by M. V. Keldysh and L. I. Sedov.

In practice, Lavrentiev managed to prove the truth of the theory in the village of Feofaniya, 20 km from Kyiv in 1944-1946. As the author later recalled, the position of vice-president of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR made it possible to quickly begin work in the explosive laboratory. Much had to be done literally on the knee. For example, Lavrentiev's driver made metal funnels for explosives. Charges Lavrentiev cast on an electric stove, pressed explosives on a conventional bookbinding press. About those days Lavrentiev writes:

“Difficulties with materials sometimes led to completely unexpected results. When approximate calculations revealed a number of properties of a cumulative explosion, I wanted to set up experiments as soon as possible that would finally confirm the theory. It was necessary to urgently grind a copper cone, but, as luck would have it, the necessary copper cylinders from which it could be made were not available. N. M. Syty found an unusual way out: he took a bundle of copper wire, wrapped it with a detonating cord and blew it up. After the explosion, we got the desired cylinder, from which Edik Wirth carved several cones. The experiments carried out fully confirmed the theory, and the theory explained all the paradoxical effects of a cumulative explosion.


In 1949, Mikhail Alekseevich was awarded the State Prize for the theory of a cumulative explosion.

In his famous article "The shaped charge and the principle of its operation" in 1957, Lavrentiev describes the mechanics of the explosion in a peculiar way. So, a cumulative cone, after compression by an explosion and thickening of the walls,

"splashes forward in a way that can be observed when sea water flows into a wedge-shaped bay."

The cumulative pestle is called a wire, which acts on the armor with a pressure of 1 million atmospheres, which is why the latter simply spreads.

Once again, it is worth emphasizing the full breadth of Mikhail Alekseevich's talent. The cumulative theory was by no means the main achievement of his scientific life. And the scientist did not live by dry mathematics alone. Lavrentiev was interested in building mathematical models of natural phenomena. A number of interesting hypotheses were expressed by him about the features of the propagation of tsunami waves, about the Novorossiysk forest, about the methods of movement of snakes and fish, about the mechanisms for the formation of wind waves and about the damping of these waves by rain. By the way, in the Novosibirsk Academgorodok, which was built under the strict guidance of the academician, the Institute of Hydrodynamics became the first operating research institute. At present, it is one of the key scientific institutions in the country dealing with the problems of explosion physics. The modern and full name of the institution is the Institute of Hydrodynamics. M. A. Lavrentiev SB RAS.

After the war, Lavrentiev did not leave applied defense research. In 1950, he studied the effects of blast waves on ships and techniques for the explosive clearance of ports. In 1953, in Sarov, he began to develop an atomic artillery shell - by that time the Soviet Union had lagged behind the United States in this topic. Three years later, an ammunition with a nuclear charge appears based on the implosion mechanism. Schematically, the Lavrentiev projectile resembled a Central Asian melon hidden inside the ammunition case.


Mikhail Alekseevich passed away in 1980 at the age of 79, leaving behind a gigantic scientific and technical heritage and a whole army of students. The defense problems solved by Lavrentiev occupied an important part of the scientist's life, but were by no means the only ones. The main creation of the academician was the Novosibirsk Academgorodok, but this is already a completely different story.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    23 August 2023 07: 48
    One thing is surprising in this "cumulative" story: despite the availability of data from foreign sources since 1939 (when the Germans used cumulative shells against forts, and there is evidence that such shells were used back in 1937-38 in Spain), Soviet specialists, until 1942, they did not believe in the presence of a "cumulative effect" of the jet and its effect in terms of armor penetration. Until 1942, they experimented with different recipes for creating "non-burning" mixtures, and only after the German cumulative shells were captured and they got acquainted with their effectiveness, they finally realized what and how. But how much time was wasted...
    1. +2
      23 August 2023 09: 24
      It's not just the lost time and the late start of work on cumulative projectiles. The creation of such artillery ammunition was prevented by the lack of sensitive and at the same time safe fuses. During the Second World War, the USSR managed to establish a mass production of only 76-mm shells for the regimental gun and 122-mm howitzer. Both projectiles, due to their low initial velocity, had an effective range of no more than 500 m against moving targets.
    2. +4
      23 August 2023 12: 37
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      One thing is surprising in this "cumulative" story: despite the availability of data from foreign sources since 1939 (when the Germans used cumulative shells against forts, and there is evidence that such shells were used back in 1937-38 in Spain), Soviet specialists, until 1942, they did not believe in the presence of a "cumulative effect" of the jet and its effect in terms of armor penetration.

      It was a little more difficult there. Judging by the "Information on the issue of armor-burning shells" dated 03.04.1942/XNUMX/XNUMX (NKBP and GAU), the work actually went in two ways - cumulative and armor-burning.

      In the original, the USSR had: fragmentary information about a certain "armor-burning projectile" from the time of the Spanish events and a German patent describing the design of such a projectile.

      Attempts to reproduce the patent and special work on armor-burning projectiles were carried out by: the Leningrad Chemical-Technological Institute, the Artillery Academy of the Spacecraft, Research Institute No. 6 and the Ostekhbyuro NKV. The result - as of April 1942, these works did not lead to positive results.

      But the cumulative direction also developed: the "Help" directly states that at the time of the discovery on March 31, 1942 of a captured 75-mm cumulative projectile, shells of this type were already being worked out in the USSR - in the NII-6 NKV and Artkom GAU.
    3. +2
      23 August 2023 17: 15
      You don't have to go far. There are at least three uncertain situations now.
      1. For automatic grenade launchers, the United States has a 40-mm cumulative fragmentation grenade, and the RF Armed Forces do not have cumulative fragmentation grenades for the AGS-30, and there is no 40-mm grenade launcher.
      There are no cumulative fragmentation mines for the 82B2 "Vasilek" automatic 9-mm mortar, although they could make a certain contribution to the destruction of enemy shelters. A special cumulative mine in 82-mm caliber existed, but there was no and no cumulative fragmentation mine.
      2. There is an air blast blaster for 120 mm mines, but not for 82 mm mines.
      3. Hunting shotguns are used for firing at small drones, but there are no cartridges with special shots, as well as shotguns themselves, which could also be used when clearing anti-personnel mines of the "petal" type.
    4. +2
      23 August 2023 18: 28
      Yes, there is nothing surprising here, if interpreted literally:
      “Although anti-tank cumulative shells were already used by the Germans in the battles for Stalingrad and these shells were copied and studied in England, the USA and here, there was no exact understanding of the physical basis of their action until 1945.”

      but PTABs were created and used on enemy tanks in the summer of 1943. This is the "cumulative effect of Academician Lavrentiev." With the working theory that he created, the questions are no longer for him, but for the manufacturability of production and the evaluation of the final product in terms of "efficiency-cost". The price of the issue has always been of paramount importance for us.
  2. +6
    23 August 2023 08: 12
    Good article about a great scientist. Respect to the author. There is an inaccuracy:
    In 1949, Mikhail Alekseevich was awarded the State Prize for the theory of a cumulative explosion.

    There were no state awards then. There were Stalin.
    1. BAI
      +2
      23 August 2023 09: 39
      Well, the author of the wiki used:
      Laureates of the Stalin Prize, awarded in 1941-1955, could exchange their medals and documents for the corresponding attributes of the State Prize. In the reference literature published in the USSR in the 1960s-1980s, the Stalin Prize itself was called the “State Prize of the USSR” for political reasons; it is she who stands behind instructions like "Laureate of the State Prize, 1949."
      1. +1
        23 August 2023 17: 53
        Well, the author of the wiki used:
        This is another source. In this case, calling the Stalin Prize State is about the same as calling the blockade of Leningrad the blockade of St. Petersburg.
  3. 0
    23 August 2023 11: 45
    if in 41 our army would have had its own "faust cartridges" and cumulative shells, maybe there would not have been these shameful and terrible "cauldrons" near Kiev, Minsk, Kharkov and Vyazma. Fascist tank wedges would get bogged down in our defense. And our fighters would not have had to crawl under tanks with a bunch of hand grenades or bottles of Molotov cocktails.
    1. 0
      23 August 2023 13: 12
      If they had adopted the Grabinskaya 57 mm anti-tank gun ...
      1. +4
        23 August 2023 13: 49
        Then the Fritz would be in Moscow. Grabinskaya ZiS-2 57 mm is a rearranged 76 mm ZiS-3, that is, the carriage is almost the same. BUT!!!! Due to the long and thin barrel, the cost of the gun was much higher, 3 times higher. Considering that the tanks against which the ZiS-2 was made (specifically the Tigers) appeared in commercial quantities in 1943 ...
        1. +4
          24 August 2023 10: 20
          Quote: Not the fighter
          Grabinskaya ZiS-2 57 mm is a re-barreled 76 mm ZiS-3

          Vice versa. ZiS-3 is the barrel of a 1897 cannon mounted on a ZiS-2 carriage. Soviet Pak 97/38.
          Quote: Not the fighter
          Considering that the tanks against which the ZiS-2 was made (specifically the "Tigers")

          Tales of politicians. Problems with breaking through triples appeared immediately, as soon as the Soviet side was able to familiarize themselves with them. That is, at the training ground, even before the war. Stug in the forehead (5 cm at an angle in early versions, 8 cm from 42 years old) is invulnerable to the Soviet anti-tank gun - namely, the shtug is the main enemy of the infantry in defense.
      2. +2
        24 August 2023 11: 36
        Quote: novel xnumx
        If they had adopted the Grabinskaya 57 mm anti-tank gun ...

        So it was accepted - in March 1941, under the official name "57-mm anti-tank gun mod. 1941."
        But in a situation where, on the one hand, the army loses more than a third of divisional guns in a little over two months of the war, and on the other, a hurricane formation of new divisions begins (as early as July 1941, it was necessary to form 71 divisions (56 divisions and 15 cd), in August 110 divisions (85 div and 25 cd), and in October 74 rifle brigades) - there is no time for fat. armies like air like bread divisional guns are needed, because artillery regiments are the basis of infantry firepower, and divisions cannot be sent into battle without them. And to increase the production of divisional guns, anti-tank guns unified with them will go under the knife among the first. Fortunately, there is at least some alternative to them - the NKBP promises to solve the problem of insufficient armor penetration of 45-mm AP shells in the fall by changing their design.
    2. +4
      23 August 2023 16: 23
      Quote: wladimirjankov
      if in 41 our army had its own "faust cartridges" and cumulative shells, maybe these shameful and terrible "cauldrons" near Kiev, Minsk, Kharkov and Vyazma would not have existed. Fascist tank wedges would get bogged down in our defense.

      Uh-huh ... KV and T-34 did not help, but the same raw "Faust-cartridges" and cumulative shells will help.
      How will the new equipment help even regular fighters, for whom the SVT is a shaitan machine, and who can kill a third of the division's rifles in four months?
      In parts of 97 SD rifles manufactured in 1940. , which were on hand for no more than 4 months, up to 29% are reduced to a state of rust in the barrel, machine guns "DP" manufactured in 1939 to 14% also have a deterioration of the barrel channels.
      © The KOVO weapons verification act for the 1940th year.
      How will faustpatrons or cumulative shells help an army in which a whole corps can abandon positions and run to the rear at the sight of an enemy reconnaissance unit of unknown size?
      How will they help the army, in which intelligence could lose an entire tank group - first near Kiev, then near Moscow?
      Quote: wladimirjankov
      And our fighters would not have had to crawl under tanks with a bunch of hand grenades or bottles of Molotov cocktails.

      Or maybe it was not necessary to lose half of the anti-tank guns by the end of August 1941? And to them also 40% of divisional guns? What are you going to shoot with cumulative shells from?

      The reasons for the defeats of the 41st were not only and not so much in the insufficient technical equipment of the troops, but in the inability of these troops to use and the unpreparedness of the personnel.
    3. +5
      23 August 2023 17: 55
      if in 41 our army had its own "faust cartridges" and cumulative shells, maybe these shameful and terrible "cauldrons" near Kiev, Minsk, Kharkov and Vyazma would not have existed.
      And how did Faust cartridges help the Germans in boilers in the summer of 1944 in Belarus?
    4. 0
      24 August 2023 10: 11
      Quote: wladimirjankov
      if in 41 our army had its own "faust cartridges" and cumulative shells

      You, I see, are not aware of this fandom. Comrade Stalin's first question to a hitman with an RPG - where do you get hexogen? By the way, by the way, how many years it will take to master stamping and where you will get so many cartridges.
      Quote: wladimirjankov
      maybe there were no these shameful and terrible "cauldrons" near Kiev, Minsk, Kharkov and Vyazma.

      There are no options.
      Let me remind you that the real USSR could not cope with the production of armor-piercing shells for standard artillery.
      1. +2
        24 August 2023 11: 26
        Quote: Negro
        By the way, by the way, how many years it will take to master stamping and where you will get so many cartridges.

        Not so easy so many rounds, but absolutely new cartridges that need to be put into series from scratch.
  4. +3
    23 August 2023 14: 08
    PTAB-2,5-1,5 weighed one and a half kilograms (in fact, even a little less), and two and a half is a caliber. Even from the name you can see.
    She has a minimum drop height of 70 meters. In any case, if dropped from 25m, as mentioned in the article, she would not have had time to stabilize.
    It is sad that there is confusion even in the sources, and in the article itself there is already confusion ...

    PS
    https://topwar.ru/67300-istoriya-odnoy-zhestyanki-chast-pervaya.html
    It is clear where the 25 m came from. True, the weight with the caliber is also confused here.
  5. +4
    23 August 2023 15: 59
    I didn’t even suspect that the copper wire wrapped with LH would be compressed into a homogeneous cylinder ...
    1. 0
      23 September 2023 19: 54
      The problem was: why sometimes after a lightning strike does a metal tube turn into a rod?
      Solution: conductors attract; if currents flow in the same direction, magnetic pressure arises.
  6. +1
    23 August 2023 18: 40
    Quote: novel xnumx
    If they had adopted the Grabinskaya 57 mm anti-tank ...

    The gun was not put into service for the main reason - the production gave too much marriage. When lend-lease machines appeared, they began to be produced in sufficient quantities.
  7. 0
    23 August 2023 18: 43
    For the first time, PTABs from Ufa were used in the Battle of Kursk, and they had a very worthy effect on the Nazis - several hundred tanks were destroyed by air strikes.

    The figures for tank losses, and even more so for irretrievable losses, vary.
    In subsequent battles, PTABs did not show much effectiveness.
    1. +3
      23 August 2023 18: 53
      The dumping of ammunition from cluster containers is still used now, it is inappropriate to talk about not too much efficiency.
      1. +1
        23 August 2023 20: 19
        Unfortunately, the aviation containers of KMGU have been decommissioned. Apparently, there were problems with the effectiveness and safety of the application.
        1. +1
          23 August 2023 21: 22
          Well, at least cluster bombs are left? And how to carry out carpet bombing now?
    2. +2
      24 August 2023 01: 39
      Quote: Pavel57
      In subsequent battles, PTABs did not show much effectiveness.

      The Germans, having fallen under the blows of attack aircraft armed with cumulative bombs, began to install net-screens against bombs over the tanks and were forced to fight in less dense battle formations. But in the first days of the German offensive near Kursk, cumulative bombs had a depressing effect on the Germans, turning the "Tigers", "Panthers" and "Ferdinands" from a miracle weapon into an ordinary one.
  8. +3
    24 August 2023 01: 59
    Very interesting and beautiful effect! Some managed to observe it, when you bend down and put an open container with liquid on the floor, you can get a drop flying out of the neck into your eye. One of my comrades caught a drop of 50% KOH with his eye.
  9. -1
    25 August 2023 09: 58
    Although anti-tank cumulative shells were already used by the Germans in the battles for Stalingrad and these shells were copied and studied in England, the USA and here, there was no exact understanding of the physical basis of their action until 1945.

    The British and Americans had their own development of shaped charges long before the war. The Munro effect, named after an American chemist, was discovered back in the 19th century. In the 30s, the Swiss chemist Henry Mohaupt made a great contribution to the development of cumulative munitions.
    By 1940, the British were already armed with a rifle anti-tank cumulative grenade Mark 1 No. 68, which, however, turned out to be not very effective, since at that moment the tanks began to acquire more and more thick armor, and the small caliber of the grenade did not allow increasing its power, therefore, they switched to hand-held anti-tank grenade launchers - PIAT from the British and Bazooka from the Americans. It is clear that until 1945, such things as the design and principles of operation were not published to the general public.
    In the USSR, there was a noticeable lag, in the first half of the war it was believed that cumulative grenades burn through armor at high temperatures, and they tried to reproduce this effect using explosives or thermite mixtures. These ideas about "armor burning" are so ingrained that even in the 70s they were present in the literature.
    For example, Air Marshal Rudenko S.I. "Wings of Victory". - M .: Military Publishing, 1976
    The bomb weighed 1,5-2,5 kg, falling on the armor of the tank, it did not bounce, but seemed to stick to it. Directed cumulative explosion through burned through the armor of the "tigers" and "panthers", and they caught fire.

    In fact, the effect was achieved primarily due to the fact that in the upper part of the tank the armor was relatively weak, 15-25 mm, and an imperfect charge of 1,5 kg of a bomb was enough to penetrate (2,5 kg is not weight, and the caliber of ammunition.The bomb was assembled in the dimensions of a 2,5-kg air bomb, hence the name) and due to the fact that the Germans moved in tight formations. After their use, the Germans changed the order of construction and the effectiveness of the PTAB decreased sharply.
  10. -1
    19 October 2023 13: 47
    If Lavrentiev considered liquids as incompressible, then we consider liquids as phase energy states. But what happens beyond these relatively stable phase states and how to transcend and use them. And for this, first of all, a new level of mathematics is needed, namely the mathematics of large or super-dynamic changes in super-large data. Many people don’t understand this, but it doesn’t change reality.
  11. -1
    19 October 2023 13: 49
    We must understand that the most powerful destructive technologies use precisely the principles of the transitional energy state of the most incompressible liquids.