When and how was the Naval Aviation of Russia really born?

22
When and how was the Naval Aviation of Russia really born?

Truly, we live in peculiar times, dear readers. On the one hand, we have just an ocean of information, on the other hand, there is no swimming in it. I went in, pobbled at the bank, and back. I'm not talking about the reader yet, I'm talking about the writers. Hooked, you know.

It all started a month ago, on the Day of the Sea aviation.



Firstly, I was surprised by the tracing paper simplified to the maximum on all channels and the media: on this day, four hydroplanes, entered into battle with four German aircraft, won. Dot. And this day became the birthday of military naval aviation.

Probably, people were sitting in these seaplanes? And, perhaps, story kept their names? Might be worth mentioning?

No, it wasn't worth it. This is probably a lot in terms of information. Seaplanes took off, won. In our time - well, more than enough.

And everyone drove such a chewing gum. Without the slightest exception, the only stunning detail is the name of hydro-air transport. "Eagle". Everything else is from the evil one.

Secondly. It confuses me, yes, I am very confused by the fact that despite the Order of the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy No. 253 of July 15, 1996 "On the introduction of annual holidays and professional days in the specialty", for almost 20 years we have been celebrating the day together with naval pilots their professional holiday… on the wrong date!

It is clear, of course, that it is not in our power to interrupt the Order of the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy (it was Admiral Vladimir Ivanovich Korolev, if anything), so naval pilots will still celebrate their professional holiday on a day that has nothing to do with them. Alas.

But we can restore historical justice on our pages. And at the same time remember all (or almost all) involved in these events.

This is our story, isn't it?


Therefore, we will now go beyond our usual wretched history, in which there is no place left for seaplane pilots, or descriptions of battles, or even correct dates. And let's try to fix everything "in an adult way."

So, as usual, we go to history. At the very beginning of the 20th century.

And we will start not with the battle, which did not take place on July 17, but with completely different events. Moreover, I am really grateful for this piece of history of our Russian Orthodox Church, which has kept in its archives some information that could confirm the truth of what is happening. They have an order there with reporting, so if there was some big event, there must have been a prayer service. Well, if there was a prayer service, then there is information in connection with what. Here are the confirmations...

Date one. October 1909.


Naval officer Lev Makarovich Matsievich submits to the Chief of the Naval General Staff, Rear Admiral Andrey Eberhard, a memorandum with the necessary technical calculations, which contained a technical justification for the construction of an aircraft carrier. A ship converted from a cruiser with a light hinged deck capable of carrying up to 25 airplanes.

Date second. February 6, 1910 In St. Petersburg, the Department of Air fleet (OFE), responsible for the management of the Russian air forces. Almost at the same time, the formation of naval aviation began.

Date three. September 16, 1910


Lieutenant Stanislav Dorozhinsky, who led the aeronautic team of the Black Sea Fleet, flew from the Sevastopol airfield Kulikovo Pole on a French Antoinette-4 aircraft. This was the first flight in the history of the Russian naval air force, from which it would be worth starting the countdown of the history of Russian naval aviation.

Date four. November 11, 1910. In Sevastopol, an officer school of the air fleet department was opened, the council of which was headed by a naval officer, Captain 2nd Rank V.N. Kedrin. The school, despite its name, did not train flight personnel. But the officers of the school did a great research and analytical work to study the possibilities of naval aviation, as such.

Date fifth. May 4, 1912.


Vice-Admiral Alexander Liven, Chief of the Naval General Staff, presents a report on the creation of aviation detachments in the fleets and some results of the work of these detachments. The report is accepted with understanding and approved by Vice-Admiral I. K. Grigorovich, Minister of the Navy. Moreover, Lieven's report was published in the form of an order by the Naval Ministry.

Date six. June 2, 1912. On this day, the Chief of the Naval General Staff, Vice Admiral Alexander Lieven, issued an order to form the necessary infrastructure of aviation units in the fleet by 1913.

Two months later, on August 2, 6, the clergy of St. Andrew's Cathedral on Vasilyevsky Island served a solemn prayer service on the occasion of the launch of the first hydroplane as part of the work of the so-called Experimental Aviation Station.

The experimental aviation station can safely be called the first official aviation unit of the Baltic Fleet. The naval aviation forces of the Baltic Fleet were simply meager: one seaplane and two land planes. As part of the Black Sea Fleet, the local detachment had five hydroplanes!

Nevertheless, the service, the essence of which was mainly to collect information about the possibility of using seaplanes in the Baltic, began. In fact, you just had to take off from the water, fly and land on the water. Throw bombs and shoot machine guns. Rescue sailors from the water and so on.

Date seven. May 18, 1915.


The new chief of the Naval General Staff, Vice-Admiral Alexander Rusin (Lieven died suddenly of a stroke), by his order created the St. Petersburg Naval Aviation Officer School. On July 28, in the presence of the chief, Grand Duke Alexander Mikhailovich, a solemn prayer service was served on the occasion of the opening of the school.

In general, the role of the uncle of the last Russian emperor, the grandson of Nicholas I, Alexander Mikhailovich Romanov, in the development of Russian naval aviation can only be underestimated.


This smartest and most competent naval officer really did so much for aviation in general and naval aviation in particular that he deserves to have his name forever left in the history of Russian aviation.

In the same 1915, in the autumn, in order to "not get in the way" of the Black Sea naval pilots, the Caspian branch of the St. Petersburg officer school of naval aviation was opened in Baku on November 22.

And within the walls of the Baku branch, all four participants in the very battle received a ticket to heaven, from which, according to the Order of the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy, Russian naval aviation began.

Date eight. July 4, 1916.

And what kind of date is this? And this, you know, is the date of that very battle. It happened a little earlier than indicated in all modern creations on this topic. Apparently, when the text of the Order of the Civil Code of the Russian Navy was being prepared, the one who wrote it decided that the date was in the old style and added the missing days!

In fact, the battle of naval pilots from the air wing of the Orlitsa hydro-air transport took place on July 4 (June 21, old style) 1916. This is reliably known, since one of the participants in this battle was presented for an award with the preparation of all the necessary documents for this.

We'll start with the ship.


It was a passenger-and-freight ship with a displacement of only 3 tons. The maximum speed is 800 knots, and the cruising speed is 12. And at this speed, the ship could travel up to 9 nautical miles, which it did before the First World War on the St. Petersburg-London line. It was built in the UK in 5 and under the name "Vologda" he began his work. Subsequently, one of the companies that bought the ship, renamed it "Empress Alexandra".

With the outbreak of the First World War, it was decided to convert the ship into hydro-air transport or, as they said then, into an aircraft carrier.

At the Putilov shipyards, the steamer was reequipped, electric winches and Temperley booms were installed for lifting and lowering seaplanes. On the deck, permanent hangars were installed with canvas body kits instead of doors. A net was stretched over two compartments, the engine room and the boiler room, to protect the deck of the ship from enemy air bombs. Artillery armament appeared from 8 75-mm guns and two Maxim machine guns. The aviation group consisted of four hydroplanes in the hangars and one, disassembled, in the hold.

Seaplanes for the first time were French FBA, which later replaced the flying boats of Dmitry Grigorovich M-9.

The ship, new for its intended purpose, received the name "Orlitsa", under which it performed many glorious deeds, participating in wartime events in the Baltic. After the change of the ruling regime and the end of the war, "Orlitsa" was renamed "Soviet", disarmed, and in June 1918 the steamer began work as a passenger-and-freight ship in the Baltic.

In 1930, the "Soviet" was transferred to the disposal of the Far Eastern Shipping Company, where the steamer worked on the lines Vladivostok - Kamchatka and Vladivostok - Northern Sakhalin. During the rescue of the crew of the Chelyuskin steamer in 1934, in difficult ice conditions, the "Soviet" made an urgent trip to the shores of Chukotka, delivering the equipment necessary for aviation operations. During the conflict near Lake Khasan in 1938, he transported troops from Vladivostok to the combat area.

The service of the first Baltic aircraft carrier ended in 1964, when the ship was dismantled for metal.

Seaplanes



As mentioned above, at first the crews of the Russian squadron on Orlitsa flew on French technology. These were hydroplanes of the Franco-British Aviation Company (FBA). Russia bought 30 type C machines with a Gnom-Monosupap engine (100 hp), another 34 were built at the Lebedev plant.

The aircraft developed a speed of up to 105 km / h and was distinguished by very good control and seaworthiness. French (and not only) seaplane pilots "FBA" were very worthy opponents of German submariners, who drank a lot of blood.

But after 1915, Russian pilots gradually began to transfer to the domestic flying boat Grigorovich M-9.


The M-9 was equipped with a French Salmson engine with a power of 150 hp, which accelerated the car to a speed of 110 km / h. Service ceiling 3 meters, flight duration up to 000 hours.

The M-9 was usually armed with one machine gun on a tripod in front of the cockpit and bombs (up to 160 kg) that were hung under the lower wing. The crew consisted of two or three people. M-9 was built in a series of more than 500 devices, which made the boat the most massive Russian seaplane of that time.

The enemy of the M-9 in that battle was the German seaplane Friedrichshafen FF.33.


A very good aircraft, most likely a modification of the FF.33I. It was an aircraft with a reduced airframe size, a 150 hp Benz Bz.III engine. and improved flight performance. The maximum speed of FF.33I is 149 km/h, cruising is about 120 km/h. Flight duration up to 6 hours. Ceiling 2 meters. The armament of the aircraft consisted of 500-1 machine guns of 2 mm caliber. A total of 7,92 aircraft were produced.

And there was another participant in this battle.

Flying boat "Hansa-Brandenburg" FB, designed by a young but promising German engineer Ernst Heinkel.


The boat was equipped with an Austro-Daimler 165 hp engine, which allowed the boat to accelerate to 140 km / h and ensured a flight duration of up to 8 hours. The Hansa-Brandenburg FB was armed with one machine gun, but could take up to 200 kg of bombs, which made the boat quite a decent strike aircraft at that time.

airmen


The entire flight crew of Orlitsa took part in that air battle. That is, all four crews.

Pilot Lt.S.A. Petrov / shooter non-commissioned officer N.P. Korshunov
Pilot Lieutenant A.N. Izvekov / shooter non-commissioned officer A.V. Nazarov
Pilot midshipman G.G. Kartsov/shooter mechanic S.A. Yarantsev
Pilot midshipman B.A. Shchepotiev / gunner non-commissioned officer A.A. Shepelev.

Let no one be embarrassed by such a set of ranks, at that time people did not come from anywhere in aviation. Our four are graduates of the Baku branch. From one issue, they received the title of naval pilots in the winter of 1916 and were sent to serve on the first Russian aircraft carrier.

In general, to be absolutely precise, the Orlitsa received its baptism of fire two days earlier. That is, July 2, 1916, according to the new style. According to reports, it was on this day that Lieutenant Sergei Petrov flew out to intercept two German aircraft that were intended to attack the battleship Slava, which was shelling German batteries on the shores of the Gulf of Riga.

In general, of course, the bombs of that time for an armored mastodon such as a squadron battleship were completely useless, on April 12, 1916, Slava already received three bombs from German seaplanes, then one sailor died.

But on July 2, Lieutenant Petrov flew out to intercept and carried it out very successfully, shooting down one German plane. The second was able to break away and escape, realizing the advantage in speed.

So the first air battle and the first victory in the Baltic took place on July 2, 1916.

And two days later, the first massive air battle took place between Russian and German seaplanes. But not 4 x 4, as our "historians" write, but still 3 against 4.

In general, this time the Germans flew specifically along the Orlitz, because they did not expect such opposition from Russian naval pilots. And having already beaten Orlitsa, one could continue to try to do something with Slava.

Therefore, 4 German aircraft flew: three Friedrichshafen FF.33 fighters and one Hansa-Brandenburg FB improvised bomber. The fighters were supposed to tie up the Russian hydroplanes in battle, and the Brandenburg from the heart to treat the Orlitsa with bombs.

This was the plan, and the Germans followed it with their proverbial precision.

But, as always, something went wrong.

Lieutenant Alexander Izvekov was on duty over the Orlitsa in loitering mode. He was the first to take the fight with three German vehicles. Three against one - not the best alignment at all times, the battle ended with the Germans shooting down Izvekov's plane. The bullets hit the gas tank, the plane caught fire and crashed into the water. The pilot, Lieutenant Izvekov, and the gunner, non-commissioned officer Nazaryev, died.


This photograph, taken in Gatchina, features Alexander Izvekov. He's on the far left

For this battle, Izvekov and Nazaryev were presented posthumously to the Order of St. George, 4th degree. And the corresponding decree was signed on August 26, 1916 according to the new style, and already from this document we can definitely establish the date when this battle took place. Not July 17th.

Izvekov and Nazaryev in their last battle were able to do the impossible - they made it possible for the rest of the crews to take off. It is clear here that hydro-air transport is not an aircraft carrier, and planes do not take off from decks and catapults, but from the water. Where they, of course, must first be placed. A long process, which can not be carried out very well under the bullets of flying enemy aircraft.

However, three of our hydroplanes took off and the battle went in a slightly different direction.

There is no information about how the Hansa-Brandenburg FB crew bombed, but this suggests that they bombed very so-so, if at all they threw bombs at Orlitsa. But one crew of three Friedrichshafen FF.33s under the luxurious number 666 was not lucky: it was shot down by the same Lieutenant Petrov.

The Germans were pursued (and even then not for long) only by midshipman Kartsov's plane, because all three German vehicles, pretty perforated, were able to go back. And two Russian seaplanes splashed down and saved the crew of a German seaplane. So Lieutenant Sieburg and Sergeant Mayer survived, but the war ended for them.

The hydroplane itself, which had capoted and turned over during landing, was not lifted: the sailors from the destroyer Okhotnik removed the machine gun and instruments from it, after which the plane was sunk by gunshots.

So the fight on July 4, which is now called the victory of July 17 in the media, is somehow not very such. The account for the lost seaplanes is 1:1, the Russian crew of the downed boat died, unlike the German one. Yes, the Germans did not fulfill their main task, but as a victorious one, Petrov's battle two days earlier looked preferable.

However, why be surprised? In such times, you know, we live ...

Probably, in order to finally close the story, it would be nice to talk about the path that fell to the lot of each of the survivors of this battle.


Another photo from the Baku Aviation School. In the bottom row, second from left - Kartsov, third - Shchepotiev

Sergei Petrov rose to the rank of senior lieutenant, became an ace. By the end of the war, he had already shot down 6 enemy aircraft on his account. For the battle on July 4, he was awarded the Order of St. George 4th degree, for other merits he was awarded the orders of St. Stanislav 3rd degree and St. Anna 3rd degree.

He ended the war as the commander of a separate naval aviation detachment of the air division of the Baltic Fleet. After the war, he was assigned to Baku, to the very school of naval aviation that he graduated from. Only now as head of school. And there, in Baku, at the end of February 1918, in an absolutely stupid situation, he was shot dead by a patrol of his own school, who did not recognize the head. It was very restless in Baku, so they fired aimlessly.

Midshipman Gennady Kartsov became a lieutenant. After the revolution of 1917, he went over to the side of the Reds and became a Red military pilot. But something went wrong, and in 1921 Kartsov became one of the participants in the Kronstadt uprising against the Soviet regime. After the uprising was suppressed on April 20, 1921, he was shot as a rebel on an absolutely stupid charge.

Naval pilot, Lieutenant Kartsov G.G. rehabilitated in 1994.

Midshipman Boris Shchepotiev.


The only one who survived both world wars. Fate pretty much shook the midshipman, who, let's say right away, also rose to the rank of lieutenant, but in a slightly different way.

After the revolution, Shchepotiev ended up in the Red Army, as a military specialist. In 1918-1919 he commanded the 2nd naval fighter squadron "Iskra" on the Northern Front, and from August 1919 he served as a pilot of the 3rd squadron on the North-Western Front.

How it happened is not entirely clear, but it was from his squadron that Shchepotiev flew to the enemy during the mission and continued to fly there, but already on the side of the White Army. And there the midshipman became a lieutenant.

After the defeat of the White Shchepotiev, in an incomprehensible way, he ended up in Estonia, where he entered the service in the naval aviation of the Estonian Navy. He rose to the rank of captain-major (captain of the 3rd rank), but after the annexation of Estonia to the Soviet Union, he retired.

On June 26, 1941, they came for Shchepotiev. He was arrested and convicted. Considering that the war was already underway, everything could have been more tragic, but the court sentenced Shchepotyev to 10 years in prison. He served a cap or three of his term in Nyroblag, Perm Region. Served everything, all ten years. He did not ask to go to the front, after the end of his term he settled there, in the village of Nyrob, where he lived until his death in early 1964.


Here is such a story. A little so different from what is now being told on TV and in some of the media. Yes, it can be said that one can close one's eyes to inaccuracies in dates, and the reason for noting is not very obvious, and the story itself is not just varnished - rather, it was formatted in full, but what can we do, we live in such times.

These were the people, this is how they flew and fought. Everything that could be told about them in a hundred years is all on our pages. There is nothing more to add to the story itself, except for my gratitude to my readers who introduced me to the Our Baku website, from where, in fact, a lot of information and photographs of the battle participants were taken.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +16
    19 August 2023 05: 07
    As always, the author has truthful and topical information!
    Why topical? Yes, simply because our top military leadership, without even delving into the draft orders written by someone, just wave them and that's it! As it happened with Naval Aviation Day!
    And respect to Roman for the work done and the restoration of historical justice!
    Thanks Roman! I always read your articles with great pleasure!
    1. +5
      19 August 2023 11: 35
      Thanks Roman! I always read your articles with great pleasure!

      + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
  2. +9
    19 August 2023 08: 24
    Thanks Roman: the material is good. From myself: the husband of my great-aunt, an officer of the tsarist army with a German-Ostsee surname, Walter, received the Order of the Red Banner in Civil War, and in 1937 he was shot on a denunciation, while his widow Lyubov, fluent in three languages, worked in Estonia during the Great Patriotic War. Soviet intelligence, after the war she took part in organizing a meeting with D'Gaulle and died in 1979. Eternal memory to all the patriots of Russia who fell in the battles for the Fatherland!
    1. +13
      19 August 2023 09: 29
      Thanks Roman: the material is good.

      ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  3. +4
    19 August 2023 08: 51
    MO: We are celebrating Naval Aviation Day on such and such a date because.
    Skomorokhov: hold my beer.
  4. +9
    19 August 2023 08: 56
    good article.
    Data, numbers, photos.
    compares favorably with some "thought on wood"
  5. +6
    19 August 2023 09: 19
    at first, the crews of the Russian squadron on Orlitsa flew on French technology. These were hydroplanes of the Franco-British Aviation Company (FBA). Russia bought 30 type C vehicles with the Gnom-Monosupap engine (100 hp)

    Pictured in the FBA Type A article. Russia operated the FBA Type C with a 9 hp Clerget 130B engine.



    School of Naval Aviation Officers in Baku.
  6. +2
    19 August 2023 09: 43
    The Soviet approach to rewriting history: whoever survives whom and who rises in rank will write history. In Kantemirovka, Voronezh Region, Poluboyarov's 17th Panzer Corps, now known as the Kantemirovskaya Panzer Division, is sacredly honored.
    The cult arose and was encouraged at the initiative of Poluboyarov himself.
    The methods were as follows:
    1. The 24th Corps of Vasily Badanov, the most famous in the operation "Small Saturn", which dealt the main blow to the operation on Rostov, liberated the eastern villages of the region. In the history of the Kantemirovskiy district, the 24th shopping mall does not exist.
    2. From the Kantemirovka area, the main blow of the Ostrogozhsk-Rossosh operation was delivered by the forces of the 3rd Panzer Army. The first successful and large-scale operation in the history of the Great Patriotic War to encircle and defeat a large enemy group does not exist in the history of the Kantemirovskiy district.
    3. The 17th Panzer Corps with its main forces at the time of the accepted date for the liberation of Kantemirovka was stationed in Rudayevka, which is 25-30 km from Kantemirovka. On December 34, 60, several T-70s and T-20s (T-1942s) supported the 267th Rifle Division, which entered the battle for Kantemirovka.
    The 267th SD is not in the history of the Kantemirovskiy district, but officially the day of the liberation of the village is December 19th.
    4. There is a large mass grave in the central square of the village. Today there is a wonderful OBD Memorial with documents about the places of death and burial of Soviet soldiers. As it turned out, the remains of the dead soldiers from the area 20-25 km away, who fought in the 3rd TA, were brought to the grave.

    You can add more. I was interested in people who were in power in the 70-80s: why did this happen?
    An order from above is the answer. They molded the heroic image of Poluboyarov, trampling others.
    The current government quite likes the current state of affairs: the cult of the Katemirov division allows you to rub closer to the center and get some profit. Why remember the 3rd Guards Tank Army, which, by and large, became the Guards in the fields of the region on January 15, 1943, when such a formation does not exist now and, therefore, it is impossible to extract any benefit for this reason?
    And there is not a single memorial or memorial sign - the history was written by boors.
    1. +3
      19 August 2023 09: 47
      Py. Sy: all of a sudden someone will be interested after reading the above: on January 15, 1943, about 16 tanks simultaneously attacked and broke through the German defenses in a section of 18-350 km.
      The fights were fierce.
      And not a single memorial.
      On the mass graves in the villages, there is not a word about the belonging of the dead to military units.
      Only the chanting of 17 TK and the genius of Poluboyarov, no one else fought.
  7. +3
    19 August 2023 10: 44
    It all started a month ago, on the day of Naval Aviation.

    One of the first who raised the issue of inconsistency between memorable and significant dates in the history of the Russian (Soviet) fleet was the captain of the 1997st rank, professor, academician of the St. Petersburg Academy of the History of Science and Technology V.D. Dotsenko, and this was in 4. In total, according to his works and articles (the most famous Myths of the Russian Navy, in my library is the 2004th edition of 17), I counted XNUMX errors, including the real "Memorable Date". Alas, the remarks of the teaching staff of the Naval Academy were shelved.
    To be honest, I personally would be interested to read about the fate of the second crew members (non-commissioned officers) of the M-9.
    1. +2
      19 August 2023 11: 20
      To be honest, I personally would be interested to read about the fate of the second crew members (non-commissioned officers) of the M-9.

      Alas, if the fate of the pilots can still be traced somehow, then there is nothing about non-commissioned officers in the accessible information field. Perhaps there is something in the archives.
      By the way, in the same archives, if desired, you can find a lot more interesting information. For example, the Highest Order of the Maritime Department No. 557 of 08.09.1915/4/XNUMX on awarding Lieutenant Sergei Andreevich Lishin with the Order of St. George XNUMXth degree for the battle against two German aircraft that tried to attack the ships of the Baltic Fleet.
      for the fact that on July 20 of this year, being on reconnaissance in the Gulf of Riga on a hydroplane, together with another pilot, seeing enemy hydroplanes on the horizon, flew towards them and entered into battle with them, not wanting to let them attack our destroyers and submarines. Despite the fact that our second vehicle was forced to descend due to engine damage, it continued to fight with two enemy seaplanes, skillfully maneuvering and well-aimed shooting knocked out one of the enemy vehicles, forcing it to descend into the area where the enemy was located, and forced the other to retreat; when this apparatus turned again to attack our submarine, then Lieutenant Lishin, despite the malfunctioning of the engine and damage to the propeller and wings, again attacked the enemy and, having fired, forced a final retreat, as a result of which the enemy was not only deprived of the opportunity to attack our court, but was not allowed to complete the exploration, the favorable result of which could have extremely undesirable consequences for us.

      As you can see, this battle took place on July 20 (old style) 1915 years.
      By the way, the FBA hydroplane piloted by Lishin had no weapons, so Lishin fired at the German planes from a Mauser, and the second crew member, non-commissioned officer Smolin, from a carbine.
      So if you work hard on the issue, then you will have to transfer not only a day, but also a year.
    2. Fat
      +1
      19 August 2023 12: 52
      Thanks to you too, Cat.
      Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
      the remarks of the teaching staff of the Naval Academy were shelved.

      Write, we'll figure it out smile
      Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
      I personally would love to read...

      Sincerely. I missed you very much smile
  8. +2
    19 August 2023 12: 39
    Thanks for the history, it was interesting.
  9. Fat
    +2
    19 August 2023 12: 43
    Roman, thanks for posting. I would be glad to read it in the "History" section, but, regretfully, I can afford to remark:
    The section where the article appeared is more readable than a boring historical investigation and mean archaeological artifacts.
    With deep respect
    This is a great, great review, thanks! drinks
  10. +1
    19 August 2023 14: 04
    The article is certainly good, only one small "blunder" (I'll be a bore laughing).
    But something went wrong, and Kartsov in 1921 became one of the participants in the Kronstadt uprising against the Soviet government. After the suppression of the uprising on April 20, 1921, he was shot, like a rebel on a totally stupid charge.

    Somehow it does not quite fit together and "cuts the eye"request
  11. -3
    19 August 2023 16: 03
    Finally, Roman returned to the genre that he does best: historical reviews about airplanes and boats.
    Afftar, write istcho!
  12. +1
    19 August 2023 16: 08
    This is a well-deserved plus: they shoveled a lot of materials, but not for nothing.
    There was something to know
  13. 0
    19 August 2023 17: 27
    Kartsov in 1921 became one of the participants in the Kronstadt uprising against the Soviet regime. After the uprising was suppressed on April 20, 1921, he was shot as a rebel on an absolutely stupid charge.
    And what is "absolutely stupid" here - the execution of an active participant in the rebellion? Here is to write so, this and there is absolutely silly.
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. 0
    20 August 2023 17: 00
    Naval aviation and amphibious aircraft are still not the same thing.
  16. +1
    20 August 2023 17: 11
    Date one. October 1909.

    Date zero: April 25, 1905. BRKR "Russia". The first rise of a balloon in a military campaign.

    ... from 7:25 on April 7, the preparation of the balloon for ascent began. At 45 hours 5 minutes, with the machine stalled, it was raised in the form of an experiment without people, then giving a stroke of 9 knots. After another training ascent and a rope change at 50:7,5 a.m., Captain F.A. Postnikov got into the basket. The ascent was successful. Thanks to two parachutes attached to the tail of the balloon, the latter stood calmly at a height. The course of the cruiser was brought up to 5,5 knots, and the wind speed in the basket did not exceed XNUMX m/s.

    The aeronaut was in the air for almost an hour and a half. Until evening, three more lifts were carried out with people (the observers were Lieutenant V.D. Alekseev, midshipman N.A. Gudim, ensign S.N. Kovanko and again F.A. Postnikov) and two without them. With a slightly hazy horizon, the range of clear visibility from a height of 200-250 m was about 20 miles. Not a single ship was found during the day.
    © Yu.O. Druzhinin, A.Yu. Emelin. Aerostat on the flagship. Gangut, No. 29.
  17. 0
    25 August 2023 15: 25
    The test is well written, if there are mistakes, the main thing with them is to remember the dog.
  18. 0
    31 August 2023 11: 09
    This topic with the translation of the Julian calendar into the Gregorian is more topical than ever. With the light hand of the "specialists" who prepared the Federal Law No. 32-FZ of March 13.03.1995, 13 "On the days of military glory and memorable dates", he misrepresented everything that was possible. Apparently, these "specialists" heard that in order to translate the calendar, 13 days must be added to the old (Julian) and there will be a new (Gregorian). And they apparently had no idea that there was a special translation technique. In the XX-XXI centuries it is necessary to add 12 days, in the XIX - 11 days, in the XVIII - 1582 days. And until 5, i.e. then, when the Gregorian calendar appeared, then NO translation is carried out at all .. And the Battle of the Ice, as it was on April 1242, 18, remains, and not on April XNUMX, as prescribed in the law. I even have an answer from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, which details the essence of the problem. All new dates are entered correctly, but to change the mistakes made.....
    And this story with the first battle of our seaplanes is very instructive. Again, the “specialist” thought that July 4 was the old style and added 13 days, but he didn’t check that July 4 had already been transferred to the new style. And apparently they didn’t know about the battle on July 2 at all. By the way, the reasoning of naval aviation historians in the Ministry of Defense is also annoying. According to their logic, the date of creation of naval aviation is necessarily a battle? And as for before the battle, we didn’t have naval aviation?!