Seaplane PBY Catalina will be upgraded and returned to the series

46
Seaplane PBY Catalina will be upgraded and returned to the series
Design appearance of the aircraft Catalina II in the military version


American company Catalina Aircraft, engaged in the repair of old aviation technology, announced a bold and interesting project. She plans to develop a project for a deep modernization of the PBY Catalina amphibious seaplane and launch mass production. It is expected that the flying boat of the Second World War, having received new units and systems, will be able to interest modern customers.



The story continues


Multi-purpose flying boat PBY Catalina was developed in the first half of the thirties by the American company Consolidated Aircraft. In March 1935, an experimental aircraft took to the air for the first time, and mass production began the following year. In October 1936, Catalina officially entered service with the US Navy, and after that deliveries began to other structures and customers.

The production of PBY Catalina aircraft was mastered by several enterprises in the USA and Canada. In addition, several dozen aircraft were assembled in the USSR from vehicle kits transferred under Lend-Lease. Production continued until the middle of 1945, and by this time more than 4 thousand cars had been assembled. All this equipment was actively used during the Second World War in different theaters and solved certain problems.

After the Second World War, the Catalina aircraft received the necessary documents for operation in civil aviation. The US Navy and other operators began to reduce their fleet and sell decommissioned aircraft with a large balance of life. In total, they were operated by more than 80 organizations and companies from more than 40 countries.


In the future, the rights to the PBY Catalina project were repeatedly transferred from one company to another. The holder of the airworthiness certificate also changed. In 2009, the newly founded Catalina Aircraft became responsible for the project. She was involved in supporting the aircraft remaining in operation, and in addition, several previously decommissioned aircraft were restored to flying condition.

Deep upgrade


On July 25, Catalina Aircraft revealed its plans for the future. Now she is not going to be limited only to maintenance and repair of equipment from the Second World War. The company intends to carry out a deep modernization of the existing amphibian, bring it into line with modern requirements and launch mass production.

A project with the working title Next Generation Amphibious Aircraft (NGAA) or Catalina II has already been launched. The general tasks of the project were formed, the appearance of the future aircraft was determined, and units were preliminarily selected to replace the existing ones. In addition, the development company has published the first image of the future aircraft.

Catalina Aircraft believes that upgrading instead of developing a new aircraft will provide technical and bureaucratic benefits. So, she will not have to re-develop the airframe and part of its systems. In addition, new approvals will not be required - for the Catalina II product, an addition to the current certificate will be issued.


Hypothetical fire modification

Plans for the future


Development of the Catalina II project has already begun, and its authors are scheduling further activities. The design will be completed no later than 2024-25. Then, on the basis of one of the surviving aircraft of the old construction, a prototype of a new modification will be made. Its first flight is scheduled for 2025, but the exact date cannot yet be named.

For further testing, six completely new amphibious aircraft will be built - three each in a civilian and military configuration. It will take several more years to produce and test this technique. These activities will only be completed by 2027-28.

By the end of the decade, Catalina Aircraft plans to start mass production of new aircraft. The company does not have its own facilities for full-fledged construction and plans to place an order at another plant. Several enterprises in the USA and Canada are considered as a future site for production. According to current plans, the first Catalina II aircraft will be handed over to customers in 2029.

The development company claims that it has already managed to find the first customer for the flying boat under development. Who exactly is going to buy Catalina-2, in what quantity and at what price, is not specified yet. However, the launch customer may be announced at the end of this year.

Replacement of aggregates


The developer company revealed the main ideas of the modernization project being created. The Catalina II aircraft will be similar in appearance and architecture to the basic design. The existing airframe as a whole will be retained, but finalized in accordance with the updated requirements. The existing propulsion system, avionics and other systems will be replaced.


Original issue PBY Catalina in pre-war US Navy livery

The possibility of creating several modifications with different features and different characteristics is being considered. For civilian customers, a cargo-passenger aircraft will be developed. They will also make a heavier multipurpose military flying boat. Based on it, a fire-fighting version with appropriate equipment can be made. In addition, the development of unmanned modifications of the seaplane is not excluded.

In all versions, Catalina-2 will receive a fuselage-boat 19,5 m long with characteristic contours and the maximum possible internal volume. A straight wing with a span of 32 m will be mounted on the pylon and with the help of struts. In the military version of the aircraft, it is planned to refine the wing mechanization to increase its efficiency. The tail of the traditional design with a stabilizer in the middle part of the keel will be preserved.

The aircraft will remain twin-engine, but regular piston engines with a capacity of 1200 hp. replaced by modern turboprops. According to some reports, these can be General Electric Catalyst products with power up to 1600 hp. The modification of the engines will depend on the design of the aircraft - the military version will receive a more powerful power plant.

The increase in power is used to increase the mass of the aircraft and its load, as well as to improve flight performance. Thus, the original flying boat PBY Catalina had a takeoff weight of no more than 16,1 tons. The military version of Catalina-2 will weigh more than 18 tons. Its payload will exceed 7,2 tons, of which more than 1,1 tons under the wing on beams holders. Depending on the needs of the operator, the aircraft will be able to carry optical, radio or hydroacoustic means for solving various tasks, as well as weapons.


"Catalina" in the coloring of the period of the Second World War

The civilian version of the flying boat, with the same dimensions, will be lighter. Its maximum takeoff weight will not exceed 14,5-14,6 tons. The payload will reach 5,4 tons. It is possible to organize a passenger compartment for 34 seats.

For the commercial version of Catalina II, the estimated cruising speed is 343 km / h, for the military - 370 km / h. The range of a passenger / cargo aircraft will exceed 2800 km, a military aircraft - more than 7 thousand km with the possibility of flying for 17-19 hours.

old new


At the moment, no more than 15-17 Catalina aircraft of the old production are in flight condition, and several more aircraft are being restored. Most of these amphibians are no longer used to solve real problems and are a kind of museum exhibits. In addition, the number of flying cars is gradually decreasing for objective reasons.

Catalina Aircraft monitors the condition of the surviving Catalinas and studies the market. In her opinion, seaplanes of this kind may still be of interest to the customer, and this niche must be filled. For this purpose, a project is being developed for a deep modernization of the old aircraft, which provides for the replacement of key units to improve the main characteristics.

The idea of ​​updating an old aircraft to meet modern requirements in general looks interesting and promising. However, the prospects for such a project depend on a number of factors - from the correctness of the proposed technical solutions to the market situation. It is quite possible that the calculations of "Catalina Aircraft" are correct, and the NGAA Catalina II aircraft will go into series and become quite massive. However, the opposite scenario cannot be ruled out yet, in which the project will not reach a large series. How exactly events will develop will become clear only in a few years.
46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +22
    11 August 2023 04: 42
    A very interesting project. Our "managers" have a lot to learn. We calculated the modernization is cheaper than creating a new one. But in this case, this is not even the main thing, all this is the company's initiative. We are developing a lot of things, but try to do it.
    1. +11
      11 August 2023 06: 20
      What are you, my friend, we can’t praise someone else’s, especially the state laughing now minuses are thrown on the sleepers to Vladivostok laughing . We can’t even praise our own, only all sorts of strange projects of pseudo-patriots with beautiful videos and strong slogans.
      1. +5
        11 August 2023 08: 51
        We had our own "Catalina" - Be-12. Alas, they recognized the concept as unpromising ....
        1. +7
          11 August 2023 09: 00
          Who recognized the Be-12 concept as unpromising?
          In the US, Catalina will be produced by a private company at its own risk. Perhaps there will be military orders, but this is only in the future. In fact, production will be based on the demand already available from private owners for such machines. Do we have a demand from private traders for the Be-12 in our country? The answer is obvious.
          1. 0
            11 August 2023 11: 11
            There are few prospects for private projects, both in our country and in the USA ... There is no main one, there is no budget cut article, and now this is the bone of the project, around which everything is built, the rest is not so important.
            1. +12
              11 August 2023 12: 20
              For a private project perspective, check out satellite imagery of Hood Lake near Anchorage Airport. There certainly are corporate cars, but most are private. In Alaska, there are almost more privately owned seaplanes than cars.
        2. +1
          11 August 2023 12: 40
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          We had our own "Catalina" - Be-12. Alas, they recognized the concept as unpromising ....

          A hopeless concept, with a complete lack of replacement? It's called sabotage
        3. +5
          11 August 2023 17: 08
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          We had our own "Catalina" - Be-12. Alas, they recognized the concept as unpromising ....

          Our air monsters stubbornly rotted the Beriev company, even with its breakthrough Albatross project (A-40).
          If the Navy was interested in new amphibious aircraft, then the Ministry of Aviation Industry believed that the tasks of anti-submarine warfare, search and rescue at sea, could be solved by land-based aircraft and helicopters.
          In the end - we played it! When the tragedy happened with Komsomolets, there was no one to quickly come to the aid of the K-278 crew.
          On April 7, 1989, the K-278 Komsomolets submarine sank in the Norwegian Sea.
          1. +2
            11 August 2023 21: 00
            Our air monsters stubbornly rotted the Beriev company, even with its breakthrough Albatross project (A-40).
            Beriev's company and the A-40 were rotten not by "aviation monsters", but by the lack of orders from the Ministry of Defense. The same Be-200 was saved by an order from the Ministry of Emergency Situations. And the A-40 was developed under the very collapse of the USSR. There was a country - there were projects. No country - no projects. Today, after 47 years, they finally resumed the lunar program - they launched Luna-25. With the same success, one can say that someone stubbornly spread rot on the Buran system.
  2. +6
    11 August 2023 05: 06
    One real conflict and one on the way with a naval component, and then Catalina appears. We calculated the need for a good inexpensive aircraft to patrol the sea surface, for example.
  3. +9
    11 August 2023 05: 48
    The production of PBY Catalina aircraft was mastered by several enterprises in the USA and Canada. In addition, several dozen aircraft were assembled in the USSR from vehicle kits transferred under Lend-Lease.
    Actually, in the USSR, these flying boats were assembled under license until 1939, before the introduction of US sanctions against the USSR for starting a war with Finland under the GTS brand
  4. -3
    11 August 2023 06: 10
    a flying boat from the Second World War, having received new units and systems, will be able to interest modern customers.
    It is strange that the United States has only now shown interest in such aircraft and decided not to go a long way from design to creation of a new one, but to modernize the old and proven one.
    1. +1
      11 August 2023 06: 28
      And what about the USA? The office is private, we scratched ourselves, we saw the demand, we decided to make money. And in order not to soar the brains of either themselves or people, they decided not to change the glider. There is a demand, but it is small and apparently, until recently, it was completely satisfied by pensioners in the form of G-21 and old Catalinas. It's time to update the park.

      In general, this is some kind of strange company "Catalina aircraft". They write about themselves - "We have been maintaining a fleet of old aircraft for 14 years." In principle, you can ask them what they want to do and whether they have copyrights and drawings, but I'm too lazy. Let the author of the article deal with laughing
      1. +3
        11 August 2023 09: 07
        An airplane is not an art book for you - patent protection lasts like 14 years, but here more than half a century has passed.
        Most likely there are drawings, because they are still engaged in the repair of these aircraft, but here they will not help much, because the floor of the aircraft will have to be redesigned for the current production facilities.
      2. Lad
        +1
        11 August 2023 20: 29
        The article writes:
        the rights to the PBY Catalina project repeatedly passed from one company to another. The holder of the airworthiness certificate also changed. In 2009, the newly founded Catalina Aircraft became responsible for the project.
  5. +3
    11 August 2023 06: 22
    What can I say: well done guys, they caught the moment; and there will be a demand for it. Now I want to scratch it too.
    1. -2
      11 August 2023 10: 03
      Where do we get demand from? We have thousands of millionaires, some of whom like to ride retro planes or fakes for them?
      1. +2
        13 August 2023 11: 47
        Well, judging by the news, the number of millionaires and billionaires is constantly growing in our country))) especially from the wives and children of officials. All as one "talented managers and business men / women"))))
    2. 0
      13 August 2023 07: 42
      Quote: Ezekiel 25-17
      What can I say: well done guys, they caught the moment; and the demand for it will

      In the 30s of the 20th century, this aircraft surpassed all other aircraft of this type and it had no competitors, but now there are a lot of seaplanes that surpass it in their characteristics and better meet the wishes of the customer
  6. +6
    11 August 2023 06: 41
    Yes, here is an example of the attitude to their inheritance! Engineering, historical and, simply, to the state. And, most importantly, they succeed. Takes envy. And, here - break - do not build (this is for us).
    1. -2
      12 August 2023 02: 05
      Quote: Volunteer Marek
      Yes, here is an example of the attitude to their inheritance!

      Well, of course, it's THEY, otherwise we ... Based on this single fact, to draw such grandiose conclusions ...
      Quote: Volunteer Marek
      And, most importantly, they succeed.

      Here's how to get it, that's when it's worth discussing. Historical "Catalina" was created on the knowledge and technology of the 30s of the 20th century. Almost a century ago, during this time we learned a lot and learned even more. So, I think from that Catalina the new one will get a name and some similar features, otherwise it will be a completely new aircraft and it’s not a fact that it will be able to press its current competitors.
  7. +4
    11 August 2023 07: 50
    Good model, we need to learn! Seaplanes are always needed and no matter what year the development is, nothing changes much there, new motors and instruments, that's all. And what do we have in this direction?
    1. +2
      11 August 2023 17: 24
      Quote: Vadim S
      Seaplanes are always needed and no matter what year the development is,

      The country's leadership has set the task of developing Siberia and the Far East. The best way to organize transport logistics is seaplanes! There are plenty of lakes and rivers here - use and rejoice, instead of investing billions in the construction of airfields on permafrost, which is already beginning to melt! (but, you see, something is wrong in the Kingdom of Denmark!)
      1. Alf
        +3
        11 August 2023 19: 34
        Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
        pour billions into the construction of airfields on permafrost, which is already beginning to melt!

        Here ! The main thing you noted. Go and prove how much of the allocated money was actually invested in construction.
    2. +1
      12 August 2023 19: 08
      Quote: Vadim S
      Good model, we need to learn!
      What
  8. +3
    11 August 2023 08: 44
    At one time, there was a very successful seaplane, whether it will be possible to repeat this at a new level is a big question. Where and how are they going to use it?
  9. -6
    11 August 2023 08: 46
    no, it won't fly. first of all, it's not pretty. and such an alteration is already a new plane and a lot of money.
    1. +2
      11 August 2023 10: 05
      A new aircraft in operation will cost less than a retro one. At least minor faults on it will certainly be less.
    2. +1
      13 August 2023 14: 05
      Quote: Sadok
      no, it won't fly. first of all, it's not pretty.

      It's you in vain ... BEAUTIFUL. Even more. She is in the UMMC museums here, so I personally saw her
      Quote: Sadok
      and such an alteration is already a new plane and a lot of money.

      And here I agree, other times, other requirements
  10. +6
    11 August 2023 09: 10
    Well.
    The idea is good. Just modernize a successful project.
    With amphibians, they wrote here, there is a shortage in the world, and the old ones are gradually failing ...
  11. +8
    11 August 2023 11: 30
    This is an outstanding aircraft! With a history to be proud of. And if you concentrate on the name of its type, flying boat, then the approach is correct - an excellent, proven boat, why invent a bicycle?

    I remember an example from WWII, when Catalina, during a rescue operation, sat on the water and picked up more sailors than she could lift into the air. And so she floated in the mode of a rescue buoy for some time, until the help she called arrived in time. Great car.

    There is a niche for economical piston and turboprop aircraft, it is not for nothing that they are being used with might and main and continue to be developed for commercial aviation. And low speed, in relation to the scenarios for using a flying boat, is often an advantage, not a disadvantage.
  12. -4
    11 August 2023 12: 56
    That is, it turns out: fundamentally different engines - no, it is not necessary to certify. The takeoff weight is 12,5% ​​more - no, everything is already certified, and seaworthiness is also, both afloat and during takeoff and landing. And the old glider will withstand the recoil from the big guns of the military version without problems, of course. And Rosie the Riveter is ready to return to the assembly line from the other world...
    The whole news is more like: EFFICIENT managers saw the possibility of profit, but they are not even able to think about possible engineering problems.
  13. +2
    11 August 2023 13: 22
    Next in line is Sunderland? How much will the Catalina in the passenger version pull?
  14. 0
    11 August 2023 14: 53
    Quote from Escariot
    Who recognized the Be-12 concept as unpromising?

    Someone ... Our chief has friends - do not spill water ... With coats of arms on shoulder straps ...
    - Vovan and I go as a couple...
  15. +7
    11 August 2023 17: 03
    Catalina in the UMMC Museum "Battle Glory of the Urals" in V-Pyshma.
    1. 0
      27 October 2023 11: 01
      Wow! Having such a plane in your collection is a huge success.
  16. +1
    11 August 2023 17: 52
    Maybe BE-12 can also be revived. New engines (although this is a sore subject for us), new avionics, composites, and help for the fleet is not bad!
  17. +2
    11 August 2023 23: 54
    Hydroaviation must develop and improve ... I see several areas in which it would be possible to concentrate the attention of the JSCB. G.M. Beriev:
    1. Creation of a seaplane for units of the ASS of the Navy (accident of the nuclear submarine "Komsomolets": many hours of waiting for help and an unprofessional "staffed" and organized rescue operation by civilian ships).
    2. Patrol artillery seaplane (similar to the American "Angel of Death" AC-130 Gunship), for long-term patrolling of the territories of naval bases, closed areas, port waters, economic zones, to combat marine drones, poaching, countering marine (river ) DRG.
    3. Far-field seaplane (up to 7000 - 8000 km) PLO ....
    The main thing is that the domestic engine building industry (aviation and marine), "together with science and management, get out of the state of suspended animation ...
    1. 0
      12 August 2023 07: 54
      It is difficult to say how a seaplane can help with rescue work. Still, his seaworthiness is so-so. You can throw off a midget rescue RIB with any aircraft with a ramp or a helicopter, but not with a hydro. But, for example, a Chinook can take a boat from the water. What no plane can do.
      1. +1
        13 August 2023 17: 40
        Dear mmax! A heavy seaplane splashes down even with a wave of 4 points ... The main thing is who is at the helm .. And with a wave higher - 4 points and the steamer is not suitable for rescue work ... A rescue seaplane, through a ramp, will take more than one rescue boat and lead to emergency board means of extinguishing or evacuating the crew. Then, promptly, deliver them to the board of the hospital ship or to the coastal base. Providing the first honey. assistance can be provided, already, on board, which is very timely, in conditions of hypothermia, especially in the autumn and winter period ... And about the Chinook - commercials, nothing more. In the rescue service of the Navy and the Coast Guard of the USA, Canada, Britain - "Chinooks" and do not smell, but "work" MH-65 Dolphin, Sikorsky MH-60T Jayhawk .... And they can lift, on a winch, no more than 200 kg .....
        1. 0
          27 October 2023 11: 11
          Unfortunately, there are no warnings now, and I only saw your comment now. Without doubting (or rather the opposite) the qualities of pilots, it must still be said that flying boats do not yet have ramps. And it is not expected. The flying boat sits quite deep. And it’s not clear where to make the ramp. Only the side door.
          And the Chinook has a ramp. Planes with tail trim so that the ramp itself is in the water. And the motor rib simply slides into the cargo compartment. It is clear that later they will tighten it up, but these are details. You can shake the rescued people out of the boat and throw the fish back. The operation has been completed and does not smell like a circus. Just hard work. And the Americans are great here. Unfortunately, we do not have the same rescue service as the Americans and the Britons.
          This trick is on YouTube. There is nothing supernatural there. Just calculation and qualified team work. The advantage of the Chinook is that, along with the presence of a tail ramp, there is no tail rotor.
          If anything: I saw seaplanes (flying boats) alive. Be-12. And the Be-200 in general in all forms.
    2. 0
      12 August 2023 07: 56
      Well, from the point of view of aircraft qualities, a seaplane, more precisely, a flying boat, will always be worse than an ordinary aircraft. And the need to land on the water while patrolling is not obvious at all.
  18. +2
    12 August 2023 07: 51
    One of the greatest aircraft of all time! Back in the early 2000s, in some documentary filming, I saw Catalin in the ranks, somewhere in South America. The Americans knew how to make airplanes.
  19. +1
    12 August 2023 08: 25
    The project is in place. Well, what, "Mars" in Canada, until recently, fires were put out. https://topwar.ru/74415-martin-jrm-mars-krupneyshiy-v-mire-seriynyy-gidrosamolet.html
  20. +1
    12 August 2023 19: 38
    Excellent airplane. Why come up with something new when the old can do it?
  21. 0
    23 November 2023 16: 19
    There are planes that were ahead of their time. Catalina is one of them. Probably the best flying boat of WW2, it fought with all its might. But a large series can no longer be launched. Maybe they’ll make a hundred / another. But it’s still funny, the plane is about 90.