What should be the fleet of Russia?

2
For more than 10 years, the heavy nuclear missile cruiser Admiral Nakhimov standing at the wall of the Sevmash plant will return to service in the 2012 year - the protracted repair will be financed and brought to completion.

In addition, the rest of the 1144 project ships will be repaired with modernization - this decision, according to available information, was made at the Russian Ministry of Defense.

The possible return to service of the 1144 missile cruiser grouping is one of the most discussed naval themes: experts and amateurs break their spears in disputes about how these ships meet today's requirements of the Russian Navy.

Admiral Gorshkov's favorite project

“Only Sergey Georgievich can afford such an expensive toy,” with this phrase Vladimir Chelomei, chief designer of the Granit missile system, the main armament of new cruisers, almost ruined relations with the USSR Navy Commander Sergey Gorshkov.

The designer was right about something: the huge and very expensive ships designed to solve one single task — the destruction of the aircraft carriers of a potential enemy, seemed anachronistic at a time when the whole world was moving towards universalization, which allowed warships to solve many different tasks with using a variety of missile weapons in universal launchers.

Of course, the ships of the 1144 project carried not only anti-ship missiles intended for the destruction of large enemy surface ships. They received a powerful air defense, and very impressive anti-submarine capabilities, but all of these tools were auxiliary - and the shock weapon the ship, its main missile system, was very highly specialized.

It was inappropriate to use these cruisers for other tasks than tracking US Navy aircraft carrier formations in readiness for a strike.


Such narrow specialization predetermined the fate of these ships in the conditions of total lack of money: by the end of the 90 of the last century, only the last one - Peter the Great, completed by political decision for the 300 anniversary of the Russian Navy, remained in the ranks. The first three ships froze at the factory "walls".

What to do with the "white elephants"?

In the British Royal navy there is a wonderful expression "white elephants", which designates warships of non-standard projects, the purpose and application of which are not clear even to specialists. It was in the position of the “white elephants” that the project 1144 cruisers in the post-Soviet Russian Navy were. Tracking the U.S. aircraft carriers could no longer be a real task - even assuming a war between Russia and the U.S., missile cruisers without support became just very large targets, and they did not have to wait for support in the context of the degradation of all key elements of the military structure of the state.

In the second half of the 2000s, money began to appear at the Armed Forces, and at the same time it was a question of returning the cruisers standing "at the wall". Naturally, a question was immediately asked about the tasks that they would have to perform in the fleet.

Almost all the experts agreed on one thing: the return of 1144 ships to the fleet is advisable only if it is deeply modernized, which will make them versatile.


By this time, opportunities for such a modernization of the Russian industry had already appeared: universal ship shooting complexes were created that significantly increased the range of weapons that a ship can be equipped with, depending on the specific task. The combat information and control systems of a new generation appeared, allowing to build a system of collective defense of the formation: exchange information in real time and control the fire of several ships from one command post.

These innovations, which are being implemented on ships of new projects currently being built by order of the Navy, have become a chance for cruisers.

Moreover, upgraded with the installation of new firing systems and electronic equipment, the 1144 cruisers will acquire a fundamentally different quality: their dimensions make it possible to equip these ships with a large amount of weapons, making them truly versatile platforms combining powerful and diverse attack weapons, anti-aircraft systems and anti-submarine defense.

Such ships will be able to perform various tasks - from supporting the actions of ground forces on the coast and in the interior of the enemy to fighting their surface ships, submarines and aviationAt the same time, it becomes possible to optimize their armament depending on the goals of each specific exit to combat service.


New structure for new cruisers

At present, the surface fleet of the Russian Navy is moving "from simple to complex" - the corvettes and frigates under construction are planned to be added in the coming decade with larger units, destroyers and universal landing ships. Unified equipment and armament ships will allow you to create efficient connections, the maintenance of which will not be ruinous for the budget due to the use of a large number of standardized components for repair and maintenance of ships of different projects.

This structure, which in itself is capable of solving a wide range of tasks, both in peacetime and in wartime, can be easily strengthened by introducing additional elements, which can be upgraded missile cruisers, and, if a corresponding political decision is taken - aircraft carriers the buildings. Moreover, the presence of combat-ready light forces is a prerequisite for the commissioning of new heavy ships: in its current state, the Russian Navy will not be able to use either universal landing ships, or missile cruisers, or aircraft carriers. The heavy combat units, deprived of escort, are doomed to "stand at the wall", occasionally going out to sea, when it is possible to assemble a combat-ready detachment of ships "from the pine forest", or simply alone - for representative purposes.

This is exactly how the aircraft-carrying cruiser Admiral Kuznetsov and the only heavy nuclear-powered missile cruiser Peter the Great in service are used today. It is hoped that the modernization of the remaining cruisers of the Ministry of Defense is not going to use them in this way.
2 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Kudrev
    0
    13 November 2010 10: 57
    As long as there is no clear concept / doctrine - "Why does Russia need a fleet AT ALL, and a surface one in particular?", The situation will be in limbo. And this, with all other favorable moments ... If everything is more or less clear for the submarine fleet, then the surface fleet ... It seems to me that its gradual degradation has already become irreversible. And one-time PR actions, such as the "return to operation" of atomic monsters of unknown purpose, are nothing more than clumsy attempts by the authorities to once again play on the "patriotic field" ... Throw a "bone" to the "patriots" ... Let them amuse themselves ...
  2. Tankograd
    0
    27 November 2010 09: 22
    The return to service of cruisers pr.1144 is the right and necessary thing for the country! nevertheless, for the Hindus and the Chinese, to finish building and rebuilding the ships remaining from the Soviet Navy. May these veterans serve Russia as well. Moreover, in the Far East, Russia is full of problems. So a serious military conflict is brewing between the Koreans. As we know, we have a common border with the DPRK. Japan wants to take everything from us the Kuril Islands! So the strengthening of the Russian fleet in the Far East is an extremely necessary measure!
    I would like there to be no distortions during the modernization of ships. Judging by the article, the preference for rearmament is given to rocketry. Maybe this is right, after all, the 21st century is in the yard! But it seems to me that it's too early to forget about artillery! It is necessary to replace the guns on the 100-130 mm cruisers with 152-155 mm caliber and in addition to them put another 152-155 "Kaolitsiya" turret in the place where the Osa air defense system was previously on Ushakov, and put a twin turret on the bow forecastle with 203 mm Pion-M guns. Then you will definitely get a non-versatile ship. Thus, in a war with a high-tech enemy, strikes will be delivered from a distance of 5000-3000 km with X-101 and RK-555 missiles, Onyx and Caliber missiles from a distance of 300 km, and with gun fire up to 50 km. To combat a technically backward enemy, the fire of 155 and 203 mm caliber guns, the warheads of which are comparable to the B / H of medium caliber missiles, will suffice. And the accuracy of the corrected projectiles of these calibers is not inferior to missiles. And this despite the fact that the cost of one projectile is ten times less than the cost of a rocket. It's time to learn how to count people's money! After all, even wealthy Americans until the end of the 20th century used their heavy artillery ships - battleships Iowa and Missouri in the wars in the Bdij East (Lebanon 1982, Iraq 1991) They used it must be said effectively and skillfully. But the battleship Missouri was built during the 2nd World War 1939-1945. The surrender of Japan on September 9, 1945 was also signed on it. I think that our glorious heavy nuclear missile cruisers, etc. 1144, will face the same fate! After their modernization and repair, they will still make a glorious military contribution to the history of Russia. Maybe on board the aircraft carrier "Admiral Lazarev" in Tokyo Bay and a peace treaty will be signed with the Japanese according to which they will forever abandon the Kuriles, Svkhalin and will utter the word Russia with fear and trepidation. there will remain at least someone who can put his hieroglyph on the act of surrender!