What should be the fleet of Russia?

11 948 2
The heavy nuclear reactor has been standing near the wall of the Sevmash plant for over 10 years. missile The cruiser Admiral Nakhimov will return to service in 2012 - the protracted repairs will be financed and completed.

In addition, the rest of the 1144 project ships will be repaired with modernization - this decision, according to available information, was made at the Russian Ministry of Defense.

The possible return to service of the 1144 missile cruiser grouping is one of the most discussed naval themes: experts and amateurs break their spears in disputes about how these ships meet today's requirements of the Russian Navy.

Admiral Gorshkov's favorite project

“Only Sergey Georgievich can afford such an expensive toy,” with this phrase Vladimir Chelomei, chief designer of the Granit missile system, the main armament of new cruisers, almost ruined relations with the USSR Navy Commander Sergey Gorshkov.

The designer was right about something: the huge and very expensive ships designed to solve one single task — the destruction of the aircraft carriers of a potential enemy, seemed anachronistic at a time when the whole world was moving towards universalization, which allowed warships to solve many different tasks with using a variety of missile weapons in universal launchers.

Of course, the Project 1144 ships carried not only anti-ship missiles designed to destroy large enemy surface ships. They also received a powerful Defense, and very impressive anti-submarine capabilities, but all these means were auxiliary - and the strike weapon the ship, its main missile system, was very highly specialized.

It was inappropriate to use these cruisers for other tasks than tracking US Navy aircraft carrier formations in readiness for a strike.


Such narrow specialization predetermined the fate of these ships in the conditions of total lack of money: by the end of the 90 of the last century, only the last one - Peter the Great, completed by political decision for the 300 anniversary of the Russian Navy, remained in the ranks. The first three ships froze at the factory "walls".

What to do with the "white elephants"?

In the British Royal navy there is a wonderful expression "white elephants", which designates warships of non-standard projects, the purpose and application of which are not clear even to specialists. It was in the position of the “white elephants” that the project 1144 cruisers in the post-Soviet Russian Navy were. Tracking the U.S. aircraft carriers could no longer be a real task - even assuming a war between Russia and the U.S., missile cruisers without support became just very large targets, and they did not have to wait for support in the context of the degradation of all key elements of the military structure of the state.

In the second half of the 2000s, money began to appear at the Armed Forces, and at the same time it was a question of returning the cruisers standing "at the wall". Naturally, a question was immediately asked about the tasks that they would have to perform in the fleet.

Almost all the experts agreed on one thing: the return of 1144 ships to the fleet is advisable only if it is deeply modernized, which will make them versatile.


By this time, opportunities for such a modernization of the Russian industry had already appeared: universal ship shooting complexes were created that significantly increased the range of weapons that a ship can be equipped with, depending on the specific task. The combat information and control systems of a new generation appeared, allowing to build a system of collective defense of the formation: exchange information in real time and control the fire of several ships from one command post.

These innovations, which are being implemented on ships of new projects currently being built by order of the Navy, have become a chance for cruisers.

Moreover, upgraded with the installation of new firing systems and electronic equipment, the 1144 cruisers will acquire a fundamentally different quality: their dimensions make it possible to equip these ships with a large amount of weapons, making them truly versatile platforms combining powerful and diverse attack weapons, anti-aircraft systems and anti-submarine defense.

Such ships will be able to perform various tasks - from supporting the actions of ground forces on the coast and in the interior of the enemy to fighting their surface ships, submarines and aviationAt the same time, it becomes possible to optimize their armament depending on the goals of each specific exit to combat service.


New structure for new cruisers

At present, the surface fleet of the Russian Navy is moving "from simple to complex" - the corvettes and frigates under construction are planned to be added in the coming decade with larger units, destroyers and universal landing ships. Unified equipment and armament ships will allow you to create efficient connections, the maintenance of which will not be ruinous for the budget due to the use of a large number of standardized components for repair and maintenance of ships of different projects.

This structure, which in itself is capable of solving a wide range of tasks, both in peacetime and in wartime, can be easily strengthened by introducing additional elements, which can be upgraded missile cruisers, and, if a corresponding political decision is taken - aircraft carriers the buildings. Moreover, the presence of combat-ready light forces is a prerequisite for the commissioning of new heavy ships: in its current state, the Russian Navy will not be able to use either universal landing ships, or missile cruisers, or aircraft carriers. The heavy combat units, deprived of escort, are doomed to "stand at the wall", occasionally going out to sea, when it is possible to assemble a combat-ready detachment of ships "from the pine forest", or simply alone - for representative purposes.

This is exactly how the aircraft-carrying cruiser Admiral Kuznetsov and the only heavy nuclear-powered missile cruiser Peter the Great in service are used today. It is hoped that the modernization of the remaining cruisers of the Ministry of Defense is not going to use them in this way.
2 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Kudrev
    0
    13 November 2010 10: 57
    As long as there is no clear concept / doctrine - "Why does Russia need a fleet AT ALL, and a surface one in particular?", The situation will be in limbo. And this, with all other favorable moments ... If everything is more or less clear for the submarine fleet, then the surface fleet ... It seems to me that its gradual degradation has already become irreversible. And one-time PR actions, such as the "return to operation" of atomic monsters of unknown purpose, are nothing more than clumsy attempts by the authorities to once again play on the "patriotic field" ... Throw a "bone" to the "patriots" ... Let them amuse themselves ...
  2. Tankograd
    0
    27 November 2010 09: 22
    The return to service of cruisers pr.1144 is the right and necessary thing for the country! nevertheless, for the Hindus and the Chinese, to finish building and rebuilding the ships remaining from the Soviet Navy. May these veterans serve Russia as well. Moreover, in the Far East, Russia is full of problems. So a serious military conflict is brewing between the Koreans. As we know, we have a common border with the DPRK. Japan wants to take everything from us the Kuril Islands! So the strengthening of the Russian fleet in the Far East is an extremely necessary measure!
    I would like there to be no imbalances in the modernization of ships. Judging by the article, preference is given to missile technology in rearmament. Maybe this is right, after all, it is the 21st century! But it seems to me that it is too early to forget about artillery! It is necessary to replace the 100-130 mm guns on the cruisers with 152-155 mm caliber guns, and in addition to them, install another 152-155 "Kaolition" turret in place of the Osa SAM system on the Ushakov, and install a twin turret with 203 mm Pion-M guns on the bow forecastle. Then we will definitely get a universal ship. Thus, in a war with a high-tech enemy, strikes will be delivered from a distance of 5000-3000 km by X-101 and RK-555 missiles, Onyx and Kalibr missiles from a distance of 300 km, and gunfire up to 50 km. To fight a technologically backward enemy, fire from 155- and 203-mm guns, the warheads of which are comparable to the warheads of medium-caliber missiles, will be enough. And the accuracy of corrected shells of these calibers will not be inferior to missiles. And this is despite the fact that the cost of one shell is tens of times less than the cost of a missile. It's time to learn to count people's money! After all, even rich Americans used their heavy artillery ships - battleships Iowa and Missouri in wars in the Middle East (Lebanon in 20, Iraq in 1982) until the end of the 1991th century. They used them effectively and skillfully, I must say. But the battleship Missouri was built during the Second World War of 2-1939. It was on it that the surrender of Japan was signed on September 1945, 9. I think that our glorious heavy nuclear missile cruisers of Project 1945 will have the same fate! After their modernization and repair, they will still make a glorious combat contribution to the history of Russia. Maybe a peace treaty with the Japanese will be signed on board the TAKR Admiral Lazarev in Tokyo Bay, according to which they will forever renounce the Kuril Islands, Svalbard and will pronounce the word Russia with fear and trembling. If, of course, after the combat work of the updated cruisers of Project 1144, there will be at least someone left in Japan who will be able to put his own hieroglyph on the act of surrender!