British AS-90 self-propelled guns for Ukraine: first losses and dubious prospects

18
British AS-90 self-propelled guns for Ukraine: first losses and dubious prospects
AS-90 of the British army on exercises. Photo by the British Ministry of Defense


protracted story with the delivery of British AS-90 self-propelled artillery mounts to Ukraine, it is approaching a logical end. After numerous promises and a long wait, such equipment ended up in the war zone. In addition, she has already suffered the first losses. Given the various circumstances and recent trends, it can now be expected that the destruction of the entire fleet of transferred AS-90s is purely a matter of technology and a matter of time.



Promises and deliveries


The first reports of a possible transfer of the AS-90 self-propelled guns to the Kiev regime appeared in the British press in March-April 2022. Then it was claimed that the British government was studying the fleet of armored vehicles of its army and deciding which vehicles, in what quantities and in what time frame, could be sent to Ukraine . Decisions of this kind were expected in the near future.

By the end of April, it became known that the British Ministry of Defense was ready to write off 20 self-propelled guns and transfer them to Kyiv over the next few months. Then the plans were revised upwards. By the end of the year, they were talking about 30 self-propelled guns with delivery in several batches. The first of them was supposed to include 8 cars and go to Ukraine in the near future.

It is noteworthy that throughout the past year, the British side only promised the supply of self-propelled guns and specified its plans, while the actual shipment of equipment did not begin. The UK Ministry of Defense announced the transfer of military vehicles only in mid-March 2023 - almost a year after the first News about plans.


Transportation of self-propelled guns across the territory of Poland, March 2023. Photo by Telegram / Dambiev

According to the military department, a total of 32 self-propelled guns were sent to Ukraine. 20 vehicles were in good condition and were intended for operation and combat use. The other 12 were "in varying degrees of readiness". They were proposed to be used as a source of spare parts to ensure the operation of combat-ready equipment.

Apparently, at the time of the official press release, the UK was just starting to ship armored vehicles. Only by the end of March, AS-90s on trawl tankers were seen in Poland. In early April, this equipment was reloaded onto railway platforms and sent to Ukraine.

In the war zone


By mid-April, the first photographs and videos appeared showing British self-propelled guns allegedly in a combat zone. At the same time, information about the combat use of such equipment was not received. Apparently, the Ukrainian artillery continued to master the received equipment, and they were in no hurry to involve it in hostilities.

The received AS-90s were held in reserve for the next two months. The first reports of their combat use date back to mid-June. As usual, the Ukrainian and friendly foreign press wrote about the highest efficiency of the British systems and their ability to change the situation at the front.


Remains of an AS-90 destroyed in early July. Photo Listarmour.info

However, bold assessments and forecasts did not come true. AS-90 actually became just another model in the arsenal of the enemy. At the same time, the number of such equipment did not allow to significantly increase the total number of the fleet and increase its combat effectiveness. In addition, the general measures of the Russian army to search for and destroy enemy artillery extended to British self-propelled guns.

Just a few weeks after entering the war zone, AS-90s suffered their first casualties. At the very beginning of July, such a vehicle fired in the area of ​​the settlement. Small Shcherbaki (Zaporozhye region) and came under counter-battery attack. An accurate hit by a Russian shell led to the complete destruction of the self-propelled gun with the detachment of the tower and the burnout of internal units.

No later than July 22, another AS-90 was destroyed. The place, time and circumstances of her death are still unknown. Judging by the condition of the wreckage, the stowage of ammunition was damaged by some kind of fire weapon, and the explosion inside the hull left no chance.

In the process of destruction


Of all the episodes of foreign military-technical assistance to Ukraine, the delivery of British AS-90 self-propelled guns looks like one of the most strange or even stupid. This story was seriously dragged out, but gave only limited practical results and did not meet the expectations of the enemy. Moreover, it is now possible to predict with certainty the further development of events.

To date, two AS-90 items are known to have been destroyed, and both are beyond recovery. It is possible that the actual number of self-propelled guns hit / destroyed is higher. One way or another, a tenth of the park, suitable for exploitation, has already been knocked out and no longer poses any danger.


Self-propelled guns, destroyed on July 22. Photo Lostarmour.info

At first glance, this is not too much. However, the Russian army is taking all measures to identify and destroy enemy artillery. This means that AS-90s will be regularly disabled or destroyed using various means. The number of such equipment, as well as enemy self-propelled artillery as a whole, will be gradually reduced.

Several factors will contribute to the speedy destruction of all British self-propelled guns. First of all, this is their limited number - only 20 combat-ready vehicles, not counting the equipment for "cannibalization". Some other foreign self-propelled guns were transferred in larger batches, but they also suffered significant losses. British cars will obviously run out even faster.

In addition, there are risks associated with the state of technology and the features of its operation. Until recently, the UK had less than 180 AS-90 SPGs, and, according to various sources, only two thirds of this fleet were serviceable or could be used after minor repairs. At the same time, only 20 combat-ready vehicles and 12 suitable only for spare parts could be found for transfer to the Kyiv regime.

Obviously, the state of British technology leaves much to be desired. There are risks of certain breakdowns, and some of them cannot be corrected for objective reasons. Therefore, it should be expected that a certain proportion of Ukrainian AS-90s will not be able to reach the firing position due to breakdowns, and then be written off due to the impossibility of recovery. The only question is the number of such machines and the speed of their failure.


A British artilleryman is loading propellant charges. Cartridge loading can pose an additional threat to the safety of the vehicle and crew. Photo by the British Ministry of Defense

Finally, it should be recalled that the AS-90 is far from the most successful and perfect self-propelled gun that came to Ukraine from abroad. In terms of characteristics and capabilities, it is seriously inferior to newer models, such as the German PzH 2000 self-propelled guns or the Polish AHS Krab.

The product "Crab" is of particular interest in this context. The fact is that the fighting compartment of this self-propelled guns was developed in the UK with the aim of deep modernization of AS-90 products. However, the British army did not update its self-propelled guns, and Poland eventually took advantage of its developments.

mutual harm


Starting from February-March last year, a number of foreign countries actively helped the Kyiv regime with the supply of various weapons and military equipment. Equipment was transferred from the presence of their own armies, and therefore morally and physically obsolete products were often sent to Ukraine. As a result, there was little benefit from such assistance.

The delivery of the British AS-90 self-propelled guns is similar to the previous controversial episodes of assistance, and also has its own dubious features. So, the recipient had to wait for the promised cars for more than a year, and the volume of deliveries and the quality of the transferred products turned out to be too low.

As a result of all these processes, the Ukrainian self-propelled artillery received a certain amount of equipment, but it will not give any advantages. At the same time, Great Britain to some extent weakened its own ground forces, which were already not the most powerful and effective.
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    6 August 2023 05: 36
    I honestly do not understand the optimism of the author. If the British transfer up to 50 vehicles to the APU, then this means Ukraine will receive 4 divisions of decent 155mm self-propelled guns. Moreover, even if almost everyone is destroyed during the war, this does not negate the benefit that they will bring to the Armed Forces of Ukraine before that.
    1. +3
      6 August 2023 06: 11
      Quote: Aron Zaavi
      I honestly do not understand the optimism of the author.

      “Here we have different standards, you won’t understand right away. You should try to respect us a little brother” (according to Vysotsky)
      If the British transfer up to 50 vehicles to the APU, ...
      this does not negate the benefits that they will bring to the Armed Forces of Ukraine before that.
      .
      Yes, at least 100 vehicles .... Shooting towards the front, even from a slingshot, will benefit the Armed Forces of Ukraine, but will not change the situation at the front, which is what the Armed Forces hope for.
      1. +8
        6 August 2023 06: 34
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Yes, at least 100 vehicles .... Shooting towards the front, even from a slingshot, will benefit the Armed Forces of Ukraine, but will not change the situation at the front, which is what the Armed Forces hope for.

        Well, in general, somewhere like that.
      2. +3
        6 August 2023 09: 55
        Each cartridge is another straw on our back, and 20 self-propelled guns is a whole bundle of brushwood. And how much more our back will endure is unknown.
    2. +2
      6 August 2023 14: 12
      Quote: Aron Zaavi
      I honestly do not understand the optimism of the author.

      Strange. Given the age, one should understand very well what propaganda is.
  2. -3
    6 August 2023 06: 02
    about the highest efficiency of the British systems and about their ability to change the situation at the front.
    fool How many there were .... how many more there will be ... recourse with a similar result. request
  3. +3
    6 August 2023 06: 15
    equipment was in the war zone. In addition, she has already suffered the first losses.
    The fact that self-propelled guns came to Ukraine is bad, but the fact that they began to be destroyed is wonderful. But it would be better if we did not get to the LBS.
  4. +10
    6 August 2023 07: 12
    Reading this is a pain. In a circle, in a circle, in a circle, the same thing, with a pitchfork in the water. The more letters, the cooler the author?
    Well, at least the author named the range, at least the rate of fire, and so the whole infa 20 was put in working order, 12 for spare parts. 2 blew up.
    But from the taiga to the British seas,
    The Red Army is the strongest of all...
  5. -1
    6 August 2023 07: 34
    It is interesting what the sponsors of the Ukrainian regime will do when there is simply nothing to transfer from their stocks. Equipment at the front, especially during the "meat assaults", is knocked out very actively. Will they intensify their production in order to maintain approximate parity, or will they still throw Kyiv away?
  6. +2
    6 August 2023 07: 42
    I plan to assemble such a model. On alik it is a little cheaper than here with us.
  7. Uno
    +6
    6 August 2023 12: 56
    the author ate the dog on dubious prospects, you can believe
    1. +3
      6 August 2023 14: 15
      Quote from Uno
      the author ate the dog on dubious prospects, you can believe

      Well, he is, of course, still far from the staver who has not yet passed Kherson.
      1. +3
        6 August 2023 15: 59
        Quote: IS-80_RVGK2
        Quote from Uno
        the author ate the dog on dubious prospects, you can believe

        Well, he is, of course, still far from the staver who has not yet passed Kherson.

        Well, Ryabov is not far from Staver. In every publication, it's boring, water and late, little, useless ... negative
  8. +3
    6 August 2023 16: 36
    Who guessed who the author of the article was from the title? I didn’t even read, the theses are already clear
  9. +2
    6 August 2023 20: 01
    Guess the melody by the first three notes!
    and dubious prospects
    Kirill Ryabov - you can't mix it up!
  10. +1
    6 August 2023 20: 46
    A serious "unit" of 155 mm with a firing range of 24700 m, and with an elongated barrel, all 40000 m ... No matter how some authors of the "comments" "boasted" about the process of "killing" them in the Ukrainian theater, "spoil blood" to our Armed Forces - oh, how possible and, with a sad outcome ... Of course, it all depends - in what hands this howitzer will fall and how it will be used ... "Leavened" patriotism with elements of "hattering" in such a serious matter, like a war, with a motivated enemy - it’s like death ... I hope that the leaders of the SVO drew the right conclusions and gave appropriate instructions and recommendations to the relevant units to "neutralize" the actions of the AS-90 self-propelled guns with their transfer to the category of scrap metal ....
  11. +3
    7 August 2023 05: 38
    You see "Dubious prospects" - you know that the article was written by Ryabov
  12. 0
    8 August 2023 16: 31
    I don't understand anything. They, in England, have an army that does not have a position - zampotech. There are 30 vehicles on the balance sheet of the military unit, 18 of them require repairs of varying complexity. And what, everyone walks by, looks at them, for 5-6 years, and nothing. Applications for the factory, the departure of the remembrigade from the factory .., the district military base of Her Majesty's army. England is not Canada, it takes 5-6 hours to get to any military unit.
    Unclear.