US is building a new missile defense site in Europe

15
US is building a new missile defense site in Europe
GhostEye LTAMDS Radar


Patriot and so on


The United States is building a missile defense position area in Poland. The State Department approved the sale of 48 Patriot M903 launchers, twelve LTAMDS (GhostEye) radars and more than six hundred Patriot Advanced Capability (PAC) 3 Missile Segment Enhanced (MSE) interceptor missiles at once. This is one of the modern missiles of the Lockheed Martin concern, which is a universal "golden bullet" for three systems at once - THAAD, Patriot and IBCS. The PAC-3 missile, in particular, successfully hit a high-speed ballistic target in March last year during tests in the United States. Moreover, the rocket worked from the THAAD platform, which significantly increased the target interception range. The Americans have high hopes for a kinetic warhead (hit-to-kill), which, unlike a fragmentation warhead, more reliably hits missiles of various classes. This is especially true for hypersonic products.




M903 LS launcher with 2 PAC-3 and 4 PAC-3 MSE missile pods

The United States is selling $15 billion worth of anti-missile defense systems to the Poles this year, the second shipment of such equipment to the country. In 2018, a contract was signed for $4,75 billion. Four years later, Warsaw received 16 launchers, four control stations, a dozen repeaters, four radars, and more than two hundred PAC 3 MSE missiles. Thus, after two contracts, 64 launchers and more than eight hundred missiles will appear in Poland. To guarantee the destruction of targets inside Poland, it will be necessary to organize a massive volley of "Caliber", "Daggers" and "Iskanders". With an increase in the number of launchers, the ability to overload missile defense with missile salvos naturally decreases. This will force the Russian leadership to deploy even more missiles in the Kaliningrad region. The arms race in the very heart of Europe is being promoted by the United States with the tacit consent of Poland's neighbors.

It is important that both the old and new deliveries of missile defense systems are integrated into a single IBCS system from Northrop Grumman. The Americans finally brought it to mind only last year. IBCS performs the functions of an integrator of air defense systems of various manufacturers and types - Patriot, NASAMS, THAAD, Sentinel, and even airborne radars of F-35 fighters. This allows you to significantly reduce the reaction time to a ballistic missile and improve accuracy. In fact, NATO is creating in Poland an analogue of the Soviet-Russian echeloned air defense, only now to fight missiles. The first Polish order has already been completed - the 3rd anti-aircraft missile brigade Patriot "Warsaw" in Sokhachev-Belitsa has been put on combat duty. The second brigade will appear next year. If we focus on the time lag between the signing of the previous contract and the supply of equipment, then the appearance of Patriot combat units from the new order is planned no earlier than December 2027. And this process can stretch until 2030. This is the most optimistic option, if Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman are not inundated with orders from other countries.

What to expect in the future? First of all, pairing the capabilities of the US-Norwegian NASAMS and Patriot, which significantly increases the ability to repel threats. This naturally shifts the balance of power in favor of the NATO countries. In order not to take advantage of this, you need to have excellent exposure. Does Warsaw have it? The question is rhetorical. If the Poles and the Americans do not stop (or someone does not stop them), then Warsaw will receive THAAD systems to intercept ballistic missiles. Linking the entire line into a single system will create a new level of threats for Russia, significantly weakening the ability to influence the military-political leadership of Poland.

NATO ramming against Russia


The rapid arming of Poland may have several reasons at once. First, the NATO bloc will need a force buffer in front of Russia after the end of the special operation. And it doesn't matter whether Ukraine is fragmented or accepts peace on Russian terms - it will forever remain in the "gray zone". The Kyiv regime can be forgotten about being accepted into the NATO bloc after Vilnius-2023. The role of the buffer is automatically shifted to the west towards Poland. Which, in the event of a war with Russia, should have both the appropriate ground forces and a powerful anti-missile defense. But there is a second scenario that is being seriously considered in NATO cabinets. This is the involvement of Poland in the conflict in Ukraine unilaterally. Otherwise, many things are simply difficult to explain. Why turn a country into the most militarized in Europe if it, like all other NATO members, is protected by the notorious fifth article of the NATO charter? If a buffer is being built against Russia, then it would be nice to extend it to the Baltic States, Romania, Slovakia and Hungary. Otherwise, this is not a defensive belt, but a concentration of forces before an invasion.


Practically devoid of its own military-industrial complex, Poland is forced to purchase from the USA and South Korea

The Poles are now buying weapons like not in myself. With the full support of the United States. Moreover, Poland defiantly distances itself from the rest of Europe. Multibillion-dollar orders go to the Americans and, to a lesser extent, to South Korea. Probably, in the near future there will be information about purchases in Israel, another vassal of Washington. Warsaw is not interested in equipment from Germany, France and the UK. The status of "ram against Russia" automatically gives preferences and even an application for leadership in the region. From the same opera, claims against the Germans, demands for reparations and other hysterical attacks by Warsaw.

The Americans have long bet on supporting the protracted conflict in Ukraine. The calculation for the gradual weakening of Russia, coupled with the build-up of the military power of the Polish army. To count on a military defeat of the Russian army, even from a super-militarized Poland, is, of course, stupid. But the NATO bloc, headed by Washington, hopes very much to shake up the internal political situation in Russia. As soon as internal contradictions spill out into the street, riots begin and the prospect of civil war looms, Poland's finest hour will come. What was Washington most afraid of when the Wagner column was moving towards Moscow? An unpredictable situation with Russian nuclear forces. Who will get the arsenal and how will they use it? Now it is Warsaw that is assigned the role of a strategic force capable of taking advantage of the turmoil and taking control of the Russian nuclear arsenal. For some time, the Poles will operate under the flags of third countries (the same Ukraine), somewhere they will use mercenaries, and somewhere they will hide behind pseudo-peacekeeping motives. Whatever one may say, but apart from the NATO contingent, only the Polish army in the near future can send strike groups to Ukraine, and then to Russia, which is engulfed in hypothetical turmoil. That is why a layered missile defense system is being built, capable of at least partially covering from retaliatory strikes. The strategy is very risky and flawed, but this is the role that Poland is destined for. The battering ram is always the first to grind off in the midst of an assault.
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    1 August 2023 07: 15
    Ram? To me, it's just business. The destruction of Europe and the pumping up of Poland somehow do not make the Poles a striking force capable of breaking Russia, even if they are processed to the degree of stubbornness of the country 404. The main thing is money, but for the stubborn wet dreams. Let's see about the Polish Wishlist of rearmament, but somewhere it looks like a grandiose scam.
    1. -1
      2 August 2023 12: 26
      Quote: Fotoceva62
      Let's see about the Polish Wishlist of rearmament, but somewhere it looks like a grandiose scam.

      The grandiose scam is reminiscent of the activities of citizen Shoigu to create a small parade biathlon army, incapable of maintaining any serious and lengthy databases. Neglect of means of communication , reconnaissance , satellite constellation , guided precision - guided munitions of the modern level . Here is such an activity on the eve of the NWO and in its initial phase - it reminds. Fortunately, now, willy-nilly, something is starting to change.
      And the Poles are building their army, using the interest of the United States and NATO, receiving loans for this, flooding South Korea and US companies with their own orders ... While the army of citizen Shoigi at that time was heroic and not without a fair amount of work and losses ... holding back the "counterattack" of the Armed Forces of Ukraine ... in the 18th month of the NWO !!!
      Quote: Fotoceva62
      Ram? To me, it's just business.

      Any weapons program is just business for someone. But not for the country and not for its army. Poland is being pumped up, and not only Poland. Finland and Sweden are accepted into NATO for a reason in an emergency (!) manner. Romania, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, etc. Eastern Europe - they will all be abandoned if they see fit. And the Baltic states are like the most convenient springboard for a breakthrough into the depths of Russia.
      Stops one thing - Nuclear Weapons of Russia.
      But the activities of the citizens of Shoigi and Gerasimov are only provoked.
      1. +1
        8 November 2023 18: 56
        Why do you only mention Gerasimov and Shoigu, and nothing to do with Putin as commander-in-chief? After all, thanks to Putin, these individuals are still in their positions.
  2. -6
    1 August 2023 08: 09
    US is building a new missile defense site in Europe
    recourse Shit dragged into Romania, not enough .... In Poland, missile defense? fool Only in Finland, where the swamps are deep, we won't get it there. request
  3. +3
    1 August 2023 08: 35
    How will the Poles pay? The money (and this is a lot of money) is apparently given by the Americans, but what is the pledge? Perhaps this is the life of ordinary Poles.
  4. 0
    1 August 2023 09: 48
    It is important that both the old and new deliveries of missile defense systems are integrated into a single IBCS system from Northrop Grumman. IBCS performs the functions of an integrator of air defense systems of various manufacturers and types - Patriot, NASAMS, THAAD, Sentinel, and even airborne radars of F-35 fighters.

    the time of wired telephone sets "has sunk into oblivion" with them, but what about us? -
    judging by the video in the cart, where our one tank turned out to be one on one with 8 cars like a catch - we don’t have any network centricity at all, not on the "ground", which means there is no "air" either ... and therefore - infa from A50 and A100 AWACS aircraft goes to the consumer "on foot"
  5. -5
    1 August 2023 11: 26
    It's fun to read something like this. Despite the Polish ambition, this is a country with a population of ~ 38 million souls, and no matter how they are pumped up with weapons, their ability to fight on a large scale, especially on the offensive, causes me considerable skepticism. Of course, there are "hot heads" and nationalists there, but one should not overestimate their number against the background of the mob contingent in general. It's one thing when these forces, under the cover of an "umbrella", rush in and occupy part of Western Ukraine. And it’s completely different if they want more - here the umbrella will be of little use.
  6. +4
    1 August 2023 12: 05
    In general, rare nonsense -
    Now it is Warsaw that is assigned the role of a strategic force capable of taking advantage of the turmoil and taking control of the Russian nuclear arsenal.
    .
    Well, it’s not too lazy to see who in the US Armed Forces is responsible for such operations? "Army of Virginia" (tm), "Type ov the spare" and so on?
    Or if you're too lazy, then you can at least look at Wiki in the Nunn-Lugar part?

    Although there is something sensible in the article, for example, the thought of “how can a country that in the 80s did not know what to eat, in the 90s was engaged in fake jeans, and by 2024-2030 it can already rise to the level SV Armed Forces of the Russian Federation"?
    1. +3
      2 August 2023 09: 36
      It is sad when the author, who has sculpted "patriotic" articles, takes up a topic in which he does not understand anything at all! sad
      What is going on with VO? One competent publication accounts for 10 such as this one. sad
  7. -2
    1 August 2023 12: 47
    Short-term "successes" lead to long-term disaster. Firstly, all the armament of Poland goes on credit, which will affect the well-being of the population. The time is not far off when ordinary Poles will switch to grasshoppers and larvae in food. Secondly, such a quantity of equipment, especially Western-style, requires expensive maintenance. This suggests that within two or three years there will be another war with the West. Otherwise, all weapons in Poland will rot away. There will be no money in the long-term maintenance of all equipment. All of Europe is already in recession. And the debts of the EU more than 100% of total GDP. Where else can you get money? Therefore, either crash on the Russian Armed Forces, or rot in the excavations of worms and larvae.
  8. -1
    1 August 2023 13: 05
    Poland is being pushed and kicked into confrontation with the Russian Federation in this format, all this insane rearmament. The experience of the war has shown that without air defense a war is not worth starting. But even a non-specialist can already see the United States is betting on the wrong "player".
  9. 0
    1 August 2023 16: 45
    Poles are merchants.
    It is not yet known who these weapons will turn against if a serious crisis occurs in the United States. Churchill gave them a very good characterization, like the hyenas of Europe! The Poles are unlikely to choose a strong opponent for themselves, without the USA they are a donut hole ................
  10. 0
    10 September 2023 10: 26
    Evgeny Fedorov writes well. Here the question arises: if we are afraid of serious unrest in Russia, does this mean that we need to keep the Putin clan in power as long as possible, if even now no one there wants to transfer the economy to a war footing? The question is serious.
  11. 0
    18 September 2023 22: 39
    Yes, we definitely need to end the “builders” and not construction sites and fences!
  12. -1
    29 September 2023 16: 16
    Quote: bayard
    And the Poles are building their army, using the interest of the United States and NATO, receiving loans for this, flooding South Korea and US companies with their own orders ... While the army of citizen Shoigi at that time was heroic and not without a fair amount of work and losses ... holding back the "counterattack" of the Armed Forces of Ukraine ... in the 18th month of the NWO !!!


    Despite all the controversy of Shoigu’s creative efforts in wood carving and writing, our Army receives the lion’s share of weapons from the domestic military-industrial complex.
    This means people are busy, wives are happy, children are happy, taxes are paid to the budget of the Russian Federation, and not the USA or South Korea.

    I hope the Poles will not limit themselves to just purchasing missile defense systems.
    Natural harmfulness and a tendency to all sorts of abominations will drive the Poles to zugunder.
    They will build bunkers and pillboxes like stupid Albanians, and sit in them, waiting for the arrival of the Russian Army.