Private refueling in the air: for whom is the attraction

33
Private refueling in the air: for whom is the attraction

For the first time in stories a private tanker aircraft aerially refueled a US Air Force aircraft. This fact received a very lively discussion, both across the ocean - and in the USA this event was called "historical", and in Europe something was said in this spirit.

Indeed, why put on such a show if, in fact, the Air Force of each country that has its own fleet of tanker aircraft completely covers today's needs. In addition, NATO ties help.



Reserve? More than doubtful, because everything can go wrong. Yes, it may make some sense to carry out such experiments over the United States or in other boundless oceanic airspaces, there is a lot of space there.

But in the skies over Europe, they remember the disaster over the Spanish city of Palomares in 1966, when it was during air refueling that the B-52 and KS-135 collided. Four hydrogen bombs, 25 megatons each, fell on land and into the sea. It's just a miracle that they didn't detonate. But the crews of these aircraft had a raid, as they say, mother do not cry. So it was not in vain that the fabulist Ivan Krylov wrote: “The trouble is, if the shoemaker starts the pies, and the pieman makes the boots.”

Therefore, perhaps, in the sky over Europe, it is worth abstaining, because how much she, old Europe, is populated. And the results of an unsuccessful refueling performed by a private trader can fall on an unsuspecting town.

Although, again, capitalism, the market, money, big money...

But I would not like to talk about sad things, I planned to just look back to remember how it all began.

A bit of history


Literally from the first days, when airplanes took to the wings, everything was subordinated to the motto: "Faster, higher, further." And if with “faster and higher” every year it turned out better and better, then with “further” it didn’t move very well. No, there were just crazy projects at the beginning of the journey, such as Blériot's flight across the English Channel, then Lindberg swung to the Atlantic ... Probably, then the blood ran cold in the veins of the inhabitants from the idea of ​​how far these plywood products with motors flew.

But I really wanted to, yes.

This is where the idea of ​​transferring fuel in the air was born. Back in 1912, the first attempts were made to transfer canisters from one aircraft to another. Due to the high danger and complexity of maneuvers, this method of transferring fuel was not developed. Did anyone get a canister of kerosene downstairs - history is silent.

A new method of refueling using a rubber hose connecting aircraft tanks was developed by aviator and designer Alexander Prokofiev-Seversky in 1917.

And after digging a little in history, I decided to bring to your attention, as it were, a historical photo essay on how refueling in the air began.


Alexander Seversky in the cockpit of his aircraft "Seversky-3"


On November 12, 1921, Wesley May crossed Long Beach, switching from a standard J-1 to a Curtis Jenny with 5 gallons of aviation fuel (approximately 19 liters). Clean water stunt.


The first successful aerial refueling using the Seversky method was carried out by American pilots in two Airco DH.4 biplanes on June 27, 1923, which allowed them to improve the record in terms of range and flight duration. You can’t imagine anything simpler: two slowly flying aircraft were connected by a hose through which fuel flowed into the refueling aircraft under the influence of gravity.


Subsequently, the transfer of fuel began to accelerate with the help of pumps. In 1942, German designers were working on a variant of air refueling of the Me.264 strategic bomber prototype to achieve intercontinental range.


It is worth noting that since 1947 the Americans have built and operated 371 Boeing KB-50s, 282 Boeing KB-29Ms, KB-29 R/Ps and 816 Boeing KC-97s!


The first jet bomber in the world to perform aerial refueling was the American North American B-45 Tornado.


The first in-flight refueling during a combat mission was made during the Korean War in the US Air Force. On July 6, 1951, RF-80 reconnaissance aircraft refueled in the air while flying to photograph objects in North Korea.

During the Vietnam War, the US Air Force mastered and began to practice helicopter air refueling and use it today.


Interesting Facts


Here are some interesting facts I thought.

From February 26 to March 3, 1949, an American B-50 aircraft made the world's first non-stop round-the-world flight, which took 94 hours and 1 minute.


This was made possible thanks to three aerial refueling.


The H-21C helicopter performed the first non-stop transcontinental helicopter flight through the United States (San Diego - Washington, August 23-24, 1957) using four aerial refueling.


The American tanker aircraft KC-10, which, in addition to additional fuel tanks, has a cargo cabin, is capable of carrying up to 77 tons of cargo.

The American reconnaissance aircraft SR-71, having a take-off weight of 77 kg when fully refueled (of which 100 kg of fuel), did not have the ability to take off with such a load.


Therefore, at first the plane took to the air with a small supply of fuel, then it was refueled in the air, after which the pilot could begin to complete the task. After full refueling, the aircraft became about twice as heavy.

Northrop Grumman has developed and tested the X-47 Pegasus drone refueling system.


Northrop Grumman X-47B during refueling

As part of the same U.S. Navy UCLASS program to develop a carrier-capable strike UAV for which the X-47 was designed, when its goal was changed to the development of an unmanned tanker aircraft, Boeing created the first prototype aircraft of this class, the Boeing MQ-25 Stingray; for the first time in history aviation performed an aerial refueling of another aircraft in July 2021.


MQ-25 refueling F-35C

The main work "tanker horses" in the US Air Force are the KC-135 and KC-10.


The KC-135 aircraft was developed primarily to increase the range of strategic bombers of the B-52 type, for which a remote-controlled telescopic rod up to 14,3 meters long was created. Initially, it was planned to transfer about half of the tanker's onboard fuel (43,5 tons).

The first prototype serial KC-135, created on the basis of the Boeing 367-80, took off on August 31, 1956. Deliveries to US Air Force Strategic Command at Castle Air Force Base in California began in June 1957. In the future, the aircraft was deeply modernized, with the replacement of engines and on-board systems, which significantly increased its performance.

Currently, 539 KC-135s and various military and research modifications continue to fly as of 2018. They are expected to operate until 2040. In total, 803 aircraft were built.

The McDonnell Douglas KC-10 Extender is an American tanker aircraft based on the DC-10 civil airliner.


Used by the US Air Force along with older KC-135s. The Dutch Air Force has two KDC-10 aircraft, which are converted DC-10s. According to its characteristics (90 tons of fuel), the KC-10 is designed primarily for interaction with tactical aircraft.

A total of 60 KC-10s were produced for the USAF. Two more were produced for the Netherlands Air Force, where they were named KDC-10.

The Boeing KC-46 is the latest generation of American tanker aircraft. Developed by Boeing based on the Boeing 767.


In February 2011, the aircraft was selected by the US Air Force to replace the outdated KC-135 Stratotanker. Fuel for return: 94 kg, which makes the aircraft more than attractive to the Air Force, but the timing of its transfer to the series, as it is fashionable to say today, has shifted to the right - until 198.

Air refueling in the USSR and the Russian Federation


The Soviet Union also developed various air refueling systems. In 1929, a group of designers led by military engineer A.K. Zapanovanny created a working system for pumping fuel in the air. In 1936, even the first refueling of a fighter in the air took place, but the system never entered the stage of practical application.

The system proved to be very complex to be operated by a single pilot, who had to manually catch the end of the hose with the weight attached and guide it into the filler neck. This was not an easy task, especially for aircraft with a closed cockpit. And then the war interrupted the work.

They returned to this idea after the Victory at a new technical level. In the early 1950s, the original idea of ​​transferring fuel on a wing-to-wing basis, developed by test pilots I. I. Shelest and V. S. Vasyanin, was adopted.


The first tankers based on the Tu-4 entered service in 1951.

Then came the Tu-16.


At the end of the 1950s, bombers developed at the Myasishchev Design Bureau (3MN-2, 3MS-2) began to be converted into tankers of the "hose-cone" system.


Air tanker 3MS-2 based on the 3M aircraft designed by Myasishchev

The latest generation of Russian air tanker aircraft are Ilyushin Design Bureau aircraft. The Il-76 became the base, the Il-78 was created on their airframe, which still serves today along with a modified version of the Il-78M. It is worth noting that the IL-78M can, of course, deliver up to 94 tons of fuel, depending on the range.


In terms of the number of tanker aircraft in service, Russia ranks fourth in the world after the United States, France and Saudi Arabia.

Private air tankers


"Currently, aerial refueling is only used on military and military transport vehicles."

The information source does not keep up with the events ...

The US Air Force has been exploring the use of third-party tanker aircraft for exercises and non-military operations for many years. This will free up the US Air Force's fleet of regular tanker aircraft. It looks, of course, strange, since the fleet of US Air Force air tankers is simply huge. Apparently, we simply do not have all the information, so the question asked at the beginning of the article remains open.

But the fact is: late last month, a KC-135R Metrea Strategic Mobility tanker aircraft took over the air-to-air refueling of US Air Force aircraft during the Resolute Hunter exercise. From 23 to 29 June he refueled RC-135 Rivet Joint and E-3 Sentry.

And such, one might say, "left" refueling occurs not only in the interests of the US Air Force. It turns out that both Navy and Marine Corps aircraft regularly use commercial aerial refueling services during exercises.

The joint RC-135 Rivet reconnaissance aircraft was the first to refuel. The KC-135R then refueled an E-3 Sentry airborne early warning aircraft. Metrea Strategic Mobility sent their KC-135R to the UK to participate in the Royal International Air Tattoo.

Probably, we are present at the appearance of another private structure working in the interests of the military. So, private air tankers will now be added to all kinds of American PMCs and private air forces (such as the Draken International).
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    24 July 2023 04: 19
    Curious stuff!
    It would be interesting to know how automated the process is today and how long it takes. Which country is the leader in this field? What are the risks in this operation? Apparently, refueling in the air requires a huge amount of effort for the pilot.
    1. 0
      24 July 2023 18: 53
      Dear Ivan!
      Thanks for your very positive rating.
      I promise to answer all your questions if the VO editors give the green light to an article on this topic.
      This is my first experience. Never wrote. Only at school, essays, but design work and a diploma, but at the institute.
      Best regards
      1. +1
        24 July 2023 21: 05
        Quote: Fachmann
        This is my first experience

        hi
        With an initiative!
        It turned out interesting and rich material good

        Private refueling in the air: for whom is the attraction

        I am from Moldova.
        In the XNUMXs, the new head of the republican traffic police arranged a small gesheft.
        Either by order, or by decree - he ordered to apply reflective stickers to ALL vehicles.
        By that time, he also brought a car of self-adhesives to the Republic.
        Everyone was happy: the sellers, the gays, and their bosses laughing

        Then there was the story of the total replacement of license plates.
        Previously, the number contained the region code, but now everything is one size fits all.
        But the bosses have changed - they also need it.

        Something was messed up with passports, and more than once ...
        Even with the census.
        The security department, together with clients and objects, was almost taken out of the Ministry of Internal Affairs into private hands!

        So it is with private tanker aircraft.
        Like Ilf and Petrov:
        “Since eggs exist, then someone must eat them?”
        1. +1
          25 July 2023 00: 28
          Thanks for rating!
          I lived in Chisinau from 1975 to 1995.
          Exactly, there was some similar story. Poor Moldova, ruined the country. Half of the population is abroad.
  2. +3
    24 July 2023 04: 40
    A civilian pilot (maybe even a retired pilot of the same tanker) was put in a standard American KS-135 tanker and "achieved outstanding success"
    And what is "tsimes" actually?
    1. 0
      7 November 2023 05: 59
      What's the "tsimes"?
      - in gesheft apparently.
      Most likely, the owners of private gas stations are “affiliates”
  3. 0
    24 July 2023 07: 18
    Now automatic fast charging of drone batteries in the air has become relevant. They will then be able to stay in flight for a long time.
  4. +1
    24 July 2023 07: 34
    Fachmenn. With an undertaking. An excellent article, just for such "amphibians" like me. Illustration photos have to be viewed with magnification - because it's interesting. Thanks for the humor in the morning, with a canister. and America, he urgently needs to bomb the bad guys, and kerosene is at the limit. Here the US anthem and a private businessman falls out of the cloud - a businessman on an airplane from a cloud with a hose, breaks a tear from patriotism. hi
    1. +1
      24 July 2023 18: 56
      Andrew, thanks for the kind words!
      But how much does this pleasure cost for private refueling of eraplans, adversaries do not write.
      Best regards
  5. +1
    24 July 2023 07: 42
    Okay, the States are in 1st place: about a thousand air tankers are powerful.
    But Saudi Arabia is in the top in front of us ... they only have two squadrons for this: 18th and 32nd.
    So we have one squadron of 78x?
    1. -2
      24 July 2023 08: 27
      Okay States

      Why do we need a lot? We are not imperialists, we are for world peace to the maximum!
      1. 0
        24 July 2023 17: 19
        Quote: Andrey “andrewTSO” D
        Why do we need a lot?
        They need 3 pieces for each strategist, and it would be nice to have the same number for long-range aviation. And this is without constant watch in the air.
    2. -1
      24 July 2023 08: 32
      We have a defensive strategy, tankers are needed mainly in offensive operations and colonial wars in order to keep various AWACS, reconnaissance aircraft, attack aircraft in the air without landing, if not all shot, as well as patrol fighters.
      1. -1
        24 July 2023 10: 21
        Quote from SincerityX
        tankers are needed mainly in offensive operations and colonial wars to keep various AWACS and reconnaissance aircraft in the air without landing

        That is, in a defensive war, it is not necessary to keep AWACS aircraft in the air? For example, in the north. where you cannot fly from one airfield to another without a PTB - but you need to control the air, because SLCMs and ALCMs can go through these "gates".
        Or will we build a triple set of AWACS aircraft: one in the air, one is preparing to take off, one is undergoing maintenance after takeoff? wink
        1. 0
          24 July 2023 10: 35
          If from the point of view of the economy, then yes: there is little point in tankers for AWACS aircraft during defensive operations, because their task is to secure more economical detection and tracking systems, for example, AWACS airships. In the same USA, TARS (tethered balloon radar system) has been used for 40 years
          1. 0
            25 July 2023 10: 06
            Quote: JcVai
            In the same USA, TARS (tethered balloon radar system) has been used for 40 years

            Uh-huh ... they use it so much that the TARS system was transferred to the border service, and the LASS system was not deployed at all.
            And these are not airships. These are tethered balloons. The operation of which somewhere on the Naryan-Mar - Vorkuta - Norilsk line seems to me ... somewhat difficult.
            1. 0
              25 July 2023 11: 09
              I doubt that the serviced system of small base-villages supporting balloon systems, economically less effective than the constant support of DRLO aircraft continuously circling in the same place.
  6. Des
    +1
    24 July 2023 08: 21
    From the article: "Of course, it looks strange, since the fleet of US Air Force air tankers is simply huge. Apparently, we simply do not have all the information, so the question asked at the beginning of the article remains open." A very correct conclusion to many comparisons like "like they have - we have." It was interesting to read and even "controversy" within itself from the article. Thank you.
  7. 0
    24 July 2023 08: 25
    In 1912, no one even thought of flying on kerosene ... Therefore, the minimum that the unfortunate participants in this action on the ground could catch was a canister of gasoline (two), maximum - both aircraft with pilots
  8. 0
    24 July 2023 08: 28
    Waiting for fueling rods on passenger transcontinental planes? This makes sense, they will decrease in size, become universal, and the requirements for the length of the runway will also become more modest. For the aircraft factory, this is a plus in that the purchased aircraft will be tied to a proprietary tanker, respectively, the airline will be forced to buy aircraft from one manufacturer.
    1. 0
      24 July 2023 10: 23
      Quote from SincerityX
      Waiting for fueling booms on passenger transcontinental planes?

      They won't, for security reasons. For refueling in the air is a constant source of accidents and disasters.
    2. +1
      24 July 2023 13: 19
      Quote from SincerityX
      Waiting for fueling booms on passenger transcontinental planes?

      For what? The Sunrise project, a non-stop Sydney-London flight, is being settled now. This is the longest flight for which there is a demand. Refueling is not required. Reduce stripes, etc. - For what? The stripes are already there.
    3. 0
      24 July 2023 17: 20
      Quote from SincerityX
      Waiting for fueling booms on passenger transcontinental planes?
      No no no!!! At least let them clearly warn, I won’t fly on this.
  9. 0
    24 July 2023 16: 01
    There is nothing new here. Some of the retired Air Force pilots continue to fly. They were given a tanker - they know how to use it. At the expense of 500+ tankers Ks135 in the ranks, the author is mistaken. This number was about 35 years ago. As they wear out, they are gradually driven away to a.b. Davis-Monthan for storage. Yes, and do not need so much now. The number of SAC aircraft has also decreased over the years from a few hundred to ~ 100-150 +/-.
    1. +2
      24 July 2023 18: 47
      Dear Gennady!
      Regarding the exact number of KS-135s currently in use in the US Air Force, it is not easy to answer. Many sources give different figures, with reference to different years.
      The latest information I found today is on the Bundeswehr website:
      "Of the original 732 US Air Force KC-135A aircraft, more than 417 have been modified with new CFM-56 engines from CFM-International. Designated KC-135R or KC-135T, the converted tanker can unload 50 percent more fuel, is 25 percent more fuel efficient, 25 percent cheaper to operate, and 96 percent quieter than the KC-135A."
      The sources of this, it can be assumed that at least 400 aircraft are actively operated in the USA alone.
      Best regards hi
  10. +2
    26 July 2023 04: 04
    The author with the initiative.
    The 135s are at the finish line, just like the KS-10: the amers are actively pushing the KS-46, having screwed up a lot during the design, they will certainly cope.
    The author completely forgot about the A330MRTT, and a field of fifty of them has already been built and is being built further. And in some ways it is more promising than KS-46
    1. +1
      26 July 2023 14: 02
      Thanks Pete Mitchell!
      I'm glad that the article interested you.
      About the Airbus A 330 MRTT (Multi-Role Tanker Transport, which is also called as KC-30A / M (Australien / NATO), KC "Cygnus", "Voyager" KC2 / KC3 and "Phenix", I, of course, have not forgotten .
      Only 56 of them were built.
      But in the article, I wrote mainly about the American and Russian air-tanker fleet, without touching on some other types of aircraft that are also capable of refueling using a PAZ (refueling outboard unit).
      Best regards hi
      1. +2
        26 July 2023 14: 35
        330 was very actively pushed into the American competition, EADS even seemed to be preparing the plant in the states, but the American lobby fulfilled its obligations. Amers even prepared 777 to oppose him, but nothing happened feel
        Once again with the initiative, keep it up soldier
      2. +2
        26 July 2023 14: 49
        I found a photo, probably six months ago

        In orderly rows, the French
  11. 0
    27 August 2023 16: 59
    The author is an eccentric, does he think the hydrogen / atomic bomb is so easy to blow up?
    Maximum - radioactive contamination
    1. 0
      28 August 2023 15: 04
      Dear Sergey,
      the eccentric author does not think that an atomic or hydrogen bomb is so easy to detonate. But over the past hundred years, there have been many very serious catastrophes that, theoretically, should not have happened. So, "never say never".
      And officially, according to the catastrophe I mentioned, the following was reported:
      “As for the bombs, three of them fell near the village of Palomares, and one fell into the sea. The bombs did not explode. However, as it turned out immediately after the incident, the detonator partially worked in two bombs and 20 kilograms of radioactive plutonium were dispersed over an area of ​​about two square kilometers. In any case, it's not pleasant.
      Best regards hi
  12. +1
    31 August 2023 14: 18
    Regarding the refueling method, we had cases on the TU-16 of the fuel supply hose getting caught behind the wing/flaps. A couple of disasters with the death of crews...
    They went their own way, I guess.
    1. 0
      31 August 2023 16: 17
      Yes, the method of refueling “from wing to wing” in the USSR Air Force was very complex and was accompanied by an increased risk compared to today’s (“Hose-cone”), which required filigree technology from the crews of both the tanker and the aircraft being refueled.
      thanks for the comment hi