Pulsar Fusion and Princeton Satellite Systems to develop fusion rocket engine

47
Pulsar Fusion and Princeton Satellite Systems to develop fusion rocket engine
Design image of the spacecraft from Pulsar Fusion. Propulsion system shown in section


For the further development of rocket and space technology and beyond the Earth's orbit, new technologies are required, first of all, fundamentally new propulsion systems. Now a number of projects of this kind based on the most daring ideas are being worked out in several countries. Thus, the British company Pulsar Fusion, in cooperation with the American Princeton Satellite Systems, began work on a Direct Fusion Drive fusion engine. It is expected that such a product will show unique technical and economic characteristics.



Promising direction


The British company Pulsar Fusion was founded in 2011 by a group of young professionals. She calls her goal the development of new propulsion systems for rocket and space technology, which will help make the next breakthrough in this area. Ideally, new developments and propulsion systems will have to provide access beyond the earth's orbit and full-fledged activity near distant celestial bodies.

The company is working on different options for engines and fuel for them. So, in November 2021, the first fire tests of solid fuels made using recycled polyethylene took place. The specific fuel charge showed the required level of performance, and also confirmed the possibility of using recyclable materials in rocket technology.


Fusion reactor engine

Over the past few years, Pulsar Fusion has been talking about its intention to develop and build a fusion rocket engine. When solving all the design problems that are set, such an installation will show unique characteristics of traction and efficiency. It is expected that with the help of a fusion engine, spacecraft will be able to cover large distances in a minimum time.

Until recently, the company was engaged only in the theoretical development of a promising project. Now the work is moving to a new stage. In mid-June, Pulsar Fusion signed an agreement with the American company Princeton Satellite Systems. Together they are going to conduct the necessary research and form the optimal image of the engine for further development of project documentation.

It is curious that the company already has a rough idea of ​​​​what a promising engine will be like. She is already demonstrating computer models of the installation itself and the spacecraft with it. The shown product has all the necessary components corresponding to the concept of the project. However, in the future, as the project develops, the appearance of the installation may change.

scientific stage


Under a recently signed agreement, Pulsar Fusion and Princeton Satellite Systems will work together on the necessary research in the near future. The technical base for these works will be provided by the American side. The main part of the work will take place at the Princeton Field-Reversed Configuration 2 (PFRC-2) research facility, which has already been used in various research programs, American and foreign.


Schematic diagram of the DFD engine

The idea of ​​a thermonuclear installation with an inverted magnetic configuration (Field-Reversed Configuration) was proposed in the early XNUMXs. Shortly thereafter, the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory built and tested a pilot plant of this kind. Having confirmed the operability of the concept, she continued research. The work is being carried out by order of the US Department of Energy and NASA.

Subsequently, Princeton Satellite Systems joined the research on a thermonuclear engine. She set up her own research base and built the PFRC-2 facility. In the future, as new stages of research are implemented, it is planned to create two more experimental complexes.

Apparently, Pulsar Fusion and Princeton Satellite Systems will share the responsibility. The American side can take a leading role in research, while British specialists will directly develop the engine based on new technologies. So, they are already assembling some units, probably for part of the testing.

No later than 2027, it is planned to build and test a full-fledged technology demonstrator engine. It will have to be significantly different from the laboratory installation and allow installation on hypothetical spacecraft.


In the process of assembling elements of an experienced DFD

Thrust from synthesis


The Pulsar Fusion and Princeton Sattelite Systems project is based on the Direct Fusion Drive (DFD) concept. It provides for obtaining thrust directly from thermonuclear fusion, without intermediate stages of power generation, etc. To implement such a concept, an engine of a specific design is required, which has some features and elements of a thermonuclear reactor.

The PFRC-2 research facility can be considered a prototype of the DFD engine. It has an appropriate design and all the necessary devices. At the same time, the laboratory complex has limited dimensions and requires a lot of related equipment. In addition, it does not show the desired level of characteristics. All this makes it possible to conduct experiments, but excludes a full-fledged implementation in practice.

The main element of the DFD engine is a thermonuclear reactor in the form of a cylindrical chamber, on which electromagnetic coils are put on from the outside. The gas used in thermonuclear fusion, such as a mixture of deuterium and helium-3, is fed into the chamber. Then the reaction starts and a plasma clot of elliptical or spindle shape is created in the center of the chamber. Provides a constant supply of new fuel to maintain the reaction for the required time.

Through one of the ends, the working fluid of the engine is fed into the chamber - this or that substance in gaseous form. In the course of research, it is necessary to determine the optimal composition of such a “fuel”. Passing through the chamber, the working fluid must receive energy, heat up without reaching the plasma state, and be directed to the nozzle at the other end of the chamber. Exiting through the nozzle, the gas will create the necessary thrust.


A thermonuclear reaction makes it possible to create a temperature of several million degrees in the reactor chamber and transfer the corresponding highest energies to the working fluid. Accordingly, it becomes possible to dramatically improve the energy parameters of the engine - its thrust will increase while maintaining an acceptable consumption of the working fluid. In this case, there are no losses for intermediate energy conversions.

Technology perspectives


Pulsar Fusion reveals the desired performance of its DFD engine. So, in the published materials, a hypothetical rocket-like spacecraft weighing 10 tons appears. It is equipped with a thermonuclear reactor several meters long, with which it can reach speeds of more than 220 km / s.

With this speed, the minimum distance from Earth to Mars is overcome in two days. The flight to Titan, to the orbit of Saturn, on the optimal trajectory will take two months. Such calculations do not take into account the need for acceleration and deceleration and other aspects of space flight. However, even in this case, the DFD project looks much more interesting than modern "chemical" engines.

Other advantages of the DFD installation are also pointed out. Thus, a thermonuclear reactor can be used to generate electricity, and in unusually large volumes for space technology. The fuel for the reactor does not require much space, and the working fluid is proposed to be collected directly in outer space. With all this, the radiation hazard of the installation and its exhaust is minimal, and in this respect DFD is superior to other options for nuclear engines for space.


However, the DFD concept has a number of disadvantages, incl. critical. First of all, the problem is the immaturity of thermonuclear fusion technology. Despite all efforts, it has not yet been possible to create a reactor that will produce more energy than is required to work with plasma. At the same time, a DFD engine needs a large energy output - the parameters of the working fluid and flight characteristics depend on it.

In addition, British and American specialists will have to solve the problem of dimensions and weight. The propulsion system must comply with the parameters of the spacecraft and the limitations of the launch vehicle. Experimental complexes occupying large premises and requiring additional infrastructure have no practical prospects.

With a vision for the future


In general, the concept of the DFD thermonuclear rocket engine and the project from Pulsar Fusion is of great interest. A new engine design for rocket and space technology is proposed, which can provide a significant increase in performance. At the same time, a new type of installation will be able to bypass existing samples in key parameters, even with limited success - such a large backlog has a new concept.

However, the development of the DFD engine faces a number of serious limitations and challenges at all levels. Even the central unit of the engine is not ready, without which the entire system will not be able to work and show the desired characteristics. Companies participating in the new project will have to solve a number of complex problems. If they cope with the tasks set, astronautics will receive new opportunities. Otherwise story rocket technology will be replenished with another interesting, but useless project.
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -5
    14 July 2023 05: 11
    Nothing good will come of it.
    The ideas of neo-colonialism in space may not appeal to those who have been given intelligence to create.
    Remember the movie John Carter? There will always be "someone" who will turn the screw the other way and hide the secret of the "ninth ray" from the curious...
    1. -1
      14 July 2023 06: 01
      It seems that we, too, are developing something nuclear for space - "the nuclear tug" Tilt "", isn't it? I wonder at what stage this project is?
      1. +1
        14 July 2023 07: 20
        Quote: Monster_Fat
        It seems that we, too, are developing something nuclear for space - "the nuclear tug" Tilt "", isn't it? I wonder at what stage this project is?

        Still in the preliminary stage. Well, its characteristics are such that the government does not give money for a full-fledged development, and given the diversion of all resources to the NWO, it will not give it in the near future
        1. 0
          14 July 2023 16: 19
          No longer
          are being tested, there are in the news, with already created physical. materials
        2. 0
          14 July 2023 21: 55
          I don't know for sure, maybe you're right, but here's what I found ..
          Patent of the Russian Federation No. RU2522971 dated July 20.07.2014, XNUMX "Nuclear power plant" (NPP)"
      2. +1
        14 July 2023 09: 20
        Nucleon!
        While the project, judging by those. decisions - a project for a long time, even if they give a lot of money and do not cut it.
        1. +3
          14 July 2023 09: 28
          Nucleon!

          T9 is!
          Worst thing on a smartphone... request
          1. +2
            14 July 2023 10: 14
            Russia leads among other countries in the development of nuclear space engines, said Dmitry Rogozin, head of the state corporation Roscosmos.

      3. +1
        14 July 2023 11: 15
        A nuclear tug is a development of a space-scale sawmill, which has the main advantage of a long time before the project is delivered, showing the working hardware. The prototype of the donkey of the padishah was taken and finalized taking into account the realities of the XNUMXst century.
      4. +5
        14 July 2023 16: 26
        Quote: Monster_Fat
        "nuclear tug "Tilt""

        NUCLEON is completely different! Nuclear is not thermonuclear.)))
        It was also Myasishchev who was working on a NUCLEAR direct flow for the Doomsday aircraft.
        I also took part in the development of an ion-plasma engine. For space it is quite real. Huge savings in working fluid. The tug scheme is ingenious. Solves the problem of biological protection of the crew. The length of the cable can be at least a couple of kilometers.
        THERMONUCLEAR is a grandiose laundering.
        It is still unknown when TOKAMAK will start working. I have been reading about him since childhood.
  2. +5
    14 July 2023 05: 41
    thermonuclear installation on a ship weighing 10 tons ... -nu-nu ...
  3. +5
    14 July 2023 06: 09
    Yes, at least you build an ordinary thermonuclear reactor - and only then aim at space. In general, humanity usually translates workable ideas into metal for a maximum of a couple of decades. And if, despite colossal investments and efforts, such a reactor cannot be created for 70 years now, then either the theory itself is not correct, or there is some other important factor ..
    1. +3
      14 July 2023 16: 31
      Quote: paul3390
      either the theory itself is not correct, or there is some other important factor ..

      The theory is correct. The stars do shine. An important factor is most likely the scale of the tokamak. Civilization is not yet so developed and there is not enough money to build it on a huge scale.
  4. +2
    14 July 2023 06: 21
    It is interesting to look at those comrades who allocate money for this idea. You have to be not just an optimist, but fabulously sick. Or someone knows how to swindle money bags well. May luck be on their side...!!
    1. +8
      14 July 2023 07: 17
      I'm wondering: are the developers so wild, or did Kirill Ryabkov decide to make fun of the readers? The entire article can be summarized in two sentences: a rocket engine is being developed with direct heating of the working fluid near the active zone of a thermonuclear reactor. The expected mass of the ship is 10 tons, the speed is up to 220 km/s, the technology demonstrator will be ready in 2027. All!
      What does the author write?
      Quote from novoku
      Passing through the chamber, the working fluid must receive energy, heat up, not reaching the state of plasma, and be directed to the nozzle at the other end of the chamber. Exiting through the nozzle, the gas will create the necessary thrust.
      This means that the temperature of the working fluid does not exceed a few thousand degrees. It is understandable, otherwise the plasma will gobble up any nozzle in a matter of minutes. Let me remind you that the thrust of a rocket engine is equal to the product of the second consumption of the working fluid by its speed. The speed is proportional to the root of the temperature: if you want to reduce fuel consumption by a factor of ten, please raise the temperature a hundred times. It would seem that everything is in order with this: a fusion is tens and hundreds of millions of degrees. But not everything is so simple: this wild temperature has nothing to do with the working fluid. And this means that the consumption of the working fluid will be of the same order as in chemical engines.
      Let me remind you: the Russian Nuklon uses ion thrusters that provide exhaust velocities of hundreds of km/s. And I'm curious: either Ryabkov confused something, or translated "jaundice", or missed something important, or are the developers frankly obscure?
      1. -5
        14 July 2023 07: 50
        Quote: astepanov
        But not everything is so simple: this wild temperature has nothing to do with the working fluid.


        Sit down, 2! And what does it have to do, based on the above figure ?! ))) I would advise you to teach physics from the section of high school, in particular the basics of thermodynamics, before publicly embarrassing yourself here.
        1. +3
          14 July 2023 09: 07
          Quote: UserGun
          I would advise you to learn physics from the section of high school, in particular the basics of thermodynamics, before publicly embarrassing yourself here.

          No, dearest! The article clearly states:
          Quote: UserGun
          the working fluid must receive energy, be heated, not reaching the state of plasma
          The typical temperature in the plasma torch is 10000 degrees, which means that the temperature of the working fluid at the exit from the reactor is obviously lower than 10000 degrees. This is already commensurate with the temperature of the torch in a mixture of oxygen with unsaturated hydrocarbons: 3100 degrees. But even an increase in temperature to 10000 degrees does not make it possible to increase the specific impulse by more than three times. And about thermodynamics: you should teach it, I have been using it in practice for almost half a century, and unlike you, I know that it doesn’t matter what happens inside a heat engine: everything is determined by the initial and final state, and the path of the process does not play a role .
      2. +3
        14 July 2023 16: 40
        Quote: astepanov
        It is understandable, otherwise the plasma will gobble up any nozzle in a matter of minutes.

        Nonsense.
        1. The plasma density is so low that even without cooling, the nozzle did not melt.
        2. Acceleration is not due to temperature, but due to the electromagnetic field (the working fluid is gallium).
        3. They closed the topic when they fought for spraying the working fluid to a molecular state. There were too many dispersed particles in the jet.
        4. The motor was designed to maintain the orbit of low-orbit photo spies.
        Food - solar batteries.
  5. -3
    14 July 2023 07: 30
    Well, they learned how to ignite plasma, the only problem is with its retention. Here, the plasma is much easier to keep than in classical reactors where it is locked in a limited volume. So the idea is interesting and most likely such an engine will work earlier than a thermonuclear power plant purely theoretically.
    1. +5
      14 July 2023 08: 24
      Well, they learned how to ignite plasma, the only problem is with its retention. Here, the plasma is much easier to keep than in classical reactors where it is locked in a limited volume.
      So after all, they are kept only to create the density necessary for a thermonuclear reaction. And then. what is written in the note is nonsense and a cut of funds.
      1. 0
        14 July 2023 08: 52
        Oh really ? Well, there was a thermonuclear reaction, so what?! The volume is CLOSED! Charles. This is exactly what they are fighting at the moment, holding the plasma, which has no way out. Hence the constant burning of the walls and other physical education associated with this. Here, everything is much simpler, based on the principle of operation. It is only unclear where to get the energy to set fire to the plasma itself, and there it needs to be spent a lot. But the profit is certainly impressive ...
        1. 0
          16 July 2023 20: 25
          The energy for heating the plasma is supposed to be taken ... from the very same thermonuclear reactions occurring in this plasma (the design includes the means of extracting energy from the plasma and converting it into electrical energy). A plan named after Munchausen, which involves pulling himself out of the swamp by his hair with his own hand. Since the energy return of a fusion is today less than the cost of it, it will not work to keep the plasma hot in a real space engine: you will not be able to take energy from something that itself produces several times less energy than it requires to work.
          If any "profit" is impressive, then the negative balance of the brain matter of those who subscribe to finance this "project".
      2. +5
        14 July 2023 09: 49
        And what is written in the note is nonsense ...

        The key issue here. Articles on complex scientific and technical topics have never been the strength of this site, and today even more so, even more so - of this author, who did not understand what he was writing about at all. For example - a fragment from the "narrative":
        The chamber is fed with a gas used in thermonuclear fusion, such as a mixture of deuterium and helium-3.

        No mixture is fed into the chamber. The Princeton Reversed Field Facility (PFRC-2) uses either helium-3 or deuterium. That is, either a triple helium reaction, or deuterium + deuterium is used.
        The rest of the verbiage in the article is as far from reality as the above example.
  6. 0
    14 July 2023 07: 38
    Well, suppose they do make the engine .. but then it’s necessary to immediately set the reverse task - braking. It is not enough to accelerate to high speeds, you still need to be able to slow down. 2 identical engines to sculpt on one spacecraft with oppositely located nozzles?
    1. 0
      14 July 2023 09: 12
      Perhaps the engine will turn in relation to the rocket body.
    2. +2
      14 July 2023 09: 18
      And turning the nozzle forward is higher mathematics? laughing
  7. +3
    14 July 2023 08: 27
    I have always believed that crazy ideas from schoolchildren who escaped from physics lessons are possible only in our country. However, this note about the illiterate American project has shaken me in this conviction. However, if this is for cutting funds, then everything is clear.
    1. 0
      14 July 2023 09: 15
      I think that the idea may turn out to be quite working, but it looks wild as a result of a clumsy compilation by the author of the article
  8. 0
    14 July 2023 10: 43
    Despite all efforts, it has not yet been possible to create a reactor that will produce more energy than is required to work with plasma.

    An experimental thermonuclear fusion reactor was built. Plasma is difficult to compress and heat up to millions of degrees, so the principle was taken from rail guns, they create a super-powerful field but for milliseconds. A magnetic field is created on the coils due to the discharge of supercapacitors, 2 plasma clots are accelerated as in a rail gun towards each other and collide, due to the addition of kinetic energy and the energy of clots, the temperature rises by 10 million degrees and a thermonuclear fusion reaction occurs and a flash of the magnetic field creates an EMF of current on the reactor coils. Electricity is generated directly in the reactor without steam turbines and boilers. The only thing needed is helium 3, which is almost non-existent on Earth, but there is a lot of it on the Moon.

    A New Way to Achieve Nuclear Fusion: Helion



    If a hole is made in this reactor in the central chamber, then it is possible to release a thermonuclear flash as a jet stream.
  9. +3
    14 July 2023 10: 55
    First, make a working fusion in exactly the configuration that you need. And then...
    In my opinion, the Chinese have a record on tokmak, that is, on a "donut", they kept the reaction for 109 seconds.
    The one that Roskosmos promises is somehow closer to the truth. Nuclear technologies are more or less mastered in our country.
  10. +4
    14 July 2023 11: 21
    A good journalist would bother to google, but what are these "participating companies of the new project", Pulsar Fusion and Princeton Satellite Systems? How many people work in them, what have they achieved to date, except "... in November 2021, the first fire tests of solid fuel made using recycled polyethylene took place" - hmm, but did they use thermonuclear polyethylene for sure? ..

    And finally, how much money is at stake for such a breakthrough technology? There is still nothing working thermonuclear on Earth, but here a whole spaceship is supposed to be made right away!

    In general, guys with really interesting ideas got a little money for their further development, to some serious embodiment of something thermonuclear "in hardware" - all the same 30 years as always.
  11. +3
    14 July 2023 12: 51
    Britain is the only country in the world that has curtailed its space program, but is known for its ambitious projects. About 40 years ago there was Hotol, 15 years ago it became Skylon, now they decided to burn down the thermonuclear engine. And on the submarines themselves, American missiles
  12. -2
    14 July 2023 12: 58
    The biggest problem in space is how to cool a heat engine. So it's all up in the air. am
  13. 0
    14 July 2023 13: 41
    Great. Good old England holds the flag of nuclear research and development. All respect. What do we have with Nuklon?
    1. 0
      14 July 2023 21: 53
      First of all, they decided to shove the nuclear reactor into the petrel and shove Poseidon, there have been ion engines for a long time. Nucleon has nothing to carry yet
  14. +3
    14 July 2023 14: 21
    Thank you for your attention to this topic, Author!

    As for the idea - the idea is a good one, if you don't think much about it, then everything looks promising.
    BUT.
    Firstly, such a product will work with extremely high temperatures, and even if the developers manage to create a radiation and thermally stable (for long-term operation without replacement) blanket, even if it has a high reflectivity to IR radiation, it’s still a question of downright horse the heat sink in a vacuum from this engine will stand, as they say, with an edge. That is, it will need massive and large-scale coolers.
    It's great to think that all the heat will go into the working fluid, unfortunately not even close ..

    Secondly, the problem of constantly supplying portions of a substance for synthesis is a headache for any thermonuclear reactors. Because this is the presence of a mechanical system in very harsh thermal and radiation conditions (in order to fly on Helium-3, you still need to get it. Other options for synthesis mixtures are much dirtier or hotter) is a vulnerability, and for rocket engines with their operating conditions and dimensions vulnerabilities are unforgivable.

    Thirdly, the issue of providing energy for superconducting magnets for this product, as well as devices for heating up to plasma. These are quite energy-intensive toys, among other things, they are also overall, taking into account the extras required for their functioning. devices, such as liquid-gas cooling systems for superconducting magnets. In this regard, the engine, in addition to the growth of energy requirements, will expand in breadth and the interweaving of these systems will definitely not make its concept simpler or safer than the current ones. Speaking of providing energy - what will they feed? I see only one option - a nuclear reactor (from which a wild heat sink will also be needed), for the year 2023 of the development of a nuclear reactor for space. devices with turbine energy conversion (the highest efficiency) in metal do not exist, various thermionic tricks are not a long-term or acceptable solution in terms of plant efficiency.

    There are doubts that, given the mass of the structure, it will be able to take off from the ground, that is, in the most optimistic version, it will be a purely space engine. For which at the moment there is no reactor, the most optimal synthesis pair, unequivocally trouble-free and compact systems for selling the substance to the "synthesis chamber", and the issue of heat removal of such an amount of heat in the void has yet to be resolved.

    I summarize - the research will be long, unprofitable and, most likely, conceptually dead-end. In the best case, along the way, they will open some stray, suitable for other projects. The engine itself on the current state of progress is a utopia.
    1. 0
      16 July 2023 20: 29
      And how will they create a vacuum? There is no absolute vacuum in outer space.
  15. 0
    14 July 2023 18: 47
    Bullshit and cartoons! fellow
    So far, there is not even an ordinary, stationary thermonuclear fusion, and it is not known when it will be, and this is not at all in this century. Dream on! fellow laughing
  16. 0
    14 July 2023 21: 40
    As I understand it, even if they assemble a reactor capable of withstanding a dozen short-term ignitions, then they have a problem with the energy for ignition. It is possible that smart people decide the stuffing for them, suggest the right direction.
    1. +3
      14 July 2023 22: 00
      There the problem is exactly the same as in the so-called "Lockheed Martin Fusion Reactor". The main thing is to announce yourself and your project loudly and juicy, to concoct everything beautifully at the presentation and “on your fingers” so that the saliva flows straight. Then scientists receive money and start to master it. For years. It is not necessary that there be some kind of exhaust at the end, but there is work and you can do "your" direction. Is it bad ? They will rub against a group of bourgeois or military that profit is at hand and forward with a song :-)

      Apparently, there is no correct direction at the moment in the field of a "small hot thermonuclear" and in dimensions less than half that of some ITERa. Because it is either unreliable and short-lived and expensive, or the efficiency will be negligible, or the concept will not work at all, from the word at all.

      Temperatures are absolutely insane and neutron bombardments from most mixtures as well. Helium-3 is magical, but it's on the moon. Its development there and its delivery back is a two-equator long detour, not to mention the issues arising from the rights of any miners on the territory of celestial bodies. Plus, Helium-3 itself lies there on the Moon in a thin layer, it’s impossible to conditionally create a mine and muddle it half to death. Maybe it’s not so much at all, as calculations show.

      Other reactions are suitable for the most part for monstrous units the size of a couple of factories, because an incredible number of safety systems are needed to accompany production processes, because a heat engine has more efficiency with a larger size, and so on.

      Fundamentally - yes, the principle is curious and the engine itself is POSSIBLE. But in size and introductory, to which, as before China, cancer. There are no such fat tasks yet, and there will be no money for such a huge ship either, but it will come out exactly huge, bigger than the ISS, with all the bells and whistles.
  17. 0
    15 July 2023 00: 04
    No later than 2027, it is planned to build and test a full-fledged technology demonstrator engine.


    I read everything carefully and did not understand.
    What other thermonuclear reactor by 2027?!
    There is still no working thermonuclear reactor anywhere in the world!
  18. +3
    15 July 2023 00: 08
    The concept is certainly good. Although the implementation in a working prototype (which will directly fly in space) will occur much later than the domestic system of an orbital tug with a nuclear power plant on electric propulsion (Zeus, Nuklon and TEM). Simply because the concept of our tug is based on technologies already developed and used. Our nuclear reactors in space were tested back in the 80s on military satellites, and ion thrusters, as marching or steering, have been actively used for many years by a significant part of all orbital and interplanetary satellites. And one of the largest manufacturers of these engines is our Fakel Design Bureau.
    But the concept of the Princeton Satellite System (for simplicity, hereinafter referred to as PSS) does not have such a backlog in this regard. The basis of the project - heating the working fluid to the state of plasma, followed by retention and "direction" to the exit from the nozzle, already exists. We have been able to create plasma and guide it along the magnetic field (so that it does not touch the walls) since the mid-50s on the very first tokamaks!
    "Why then do we still not have a working fusion reactor?" - you ask! A reactor is a reactor only if the reaction with energy release goes on and is maintained for a long time! Nuclear reactors operate for months and years. Turbines at hydroelectric power plants also work for months. Solar panels at solar power plants work for weeks and months (the indicated breaks are caused by the need to periodically carry out maintenance and inspection). But on the most advanced tokamaks - we have so far supported the plasma in the region ...... minutes ..... a record of 70 seconds! We have a problem with learning how to hold plasma for a long time. And in order to create it and hold it with a magnetic field - there have been no problems since the beginning of the 60s
    For the PSS engine, we just need only the generation of plasma and its direction to the "exit" by the magnetic field. Long plasma retention is NOT needed there.
    The PSS problem is different. Unlike conventional nuclear reactors and ion engines, plasma generators and generators of strong magnetic fields to control this very plasma have never been created or tested in space! Accordingly, the PSS project still has a long way to go to find the pitfalls of operating such an installation EXACTLY IN SPACE.
    The next problem of such a system is the starting energy consumption. To START such an engine, you need a lot of energy. Because a lot of energy is needed to heat the working fluid to the state of plasma and to power the electromagnets, which will hold and direct the plasma flow. These are huge energy costs. Moreover, if the energy for heating the working fluid is needed only at the start (and then, as in a conventional furnace, we throw in new portions of the working fluid to maintain the temperature), then the electromagnets must be powered ALL the time while the engine is running.
    Yes! It can be assumed that the design of the engine is such that part of the released thermal energy will be converted into electrical energy in order to maintain its own operation after starting, until a shutdown command is given! Only this does not explain - so where do you get the energy for the starting launch.
    Or you will have to take a small nuclear reactor with you on board (but this will make the engine even heavier and more expensive, and will also require an overall cooling system). You can supply a GIANT number of batteries, but then it will eat up a bunch of payload!

    From the above it may seem that I am against the concept of PSS. But this is not so, I only showed significant shortcomings of the project. But the project itself is still promising and, most importantly, unlike our TEM, it will allow us to fully DEVELOP the solar system. TEM will allow (in case of successful implementation) to begin industrial development and preparation of the solar system. Create a network of interplanetary communications and navigation satellites, send heavy orbital exploration satellites, send heavy automatic research vehicles to planets / asteroids / satellites / comets, build a lunar satellite infrastructure and supply the surface of the moon with everything necessary to create a lunar research colony. But now PSS will already make it possible to turn the "exploration and development" of the solar system into a full-fledged "occupation and exploitation." The characteristics of the PSS engine will make it possible to establish the industrial extraction of resources in the solar system, the transportation of these same resources, and also the rapid movement of such large and heavy loads - that it will be possible to send people throughout the solar system on an industrial scale (for example, as shift workers to resource extraction enterprises ). And this is a direct way to colonize the solar system! And just as it was with the new world, those who are bigger and more literate will occupy many new territories in the solar system - they will become the new great powers!
    1. 0
      16 July 2023 20: 32
      Then Baron Munchausen also had a "good concept" ... "I took my hair and pulled it" :).
  19. +1
    15 July 2023 17: 54
    All this is a continuation of one-dimensional interaction with the environment. My opinion is - EM Drive is also a one-dimensional magnetron and therefore it does not have a visible result, but, as a plus, it shows how you can influence the environment in a closed space, but if you make a multidimensional magnetron [with three- and / or more -dimensional ] influence on the environment, then the result visible and recorded by the devices may well be an emerging effect of a distant, and closed space, point. I think such a space engine will be more energy efficient and at some point in space it will overtake the engine from Pulsar Fusion in speed and with the help of a multidimensional magnetron it will be possible to correct the direction of movement of the spacecraft by simply modulating the electron flow in the output resonators of the magnetron. And to power the power plant of the spacecraft, I propose to use the following generation of a thermonuclear reactor of the HB3 Energy type. At present, Heinrich Hora and his team have patented a one-dimensional reactor for generating energy from the fusion of hydrogen and boron atoms, which is quite hardware-intensive - to obtain the fusion of hydrogen and boron nuclei with the release of ELECTRIC ENERGY, without heat and radiation, it is necessary to use very bulky 3-Petta-Watt per pulse , lasers found in Osaka, Japan. But there are thoughts, not yet put on paper in the form of an application for an acquisition, how to make this process multidimensional, less hardware-intensive and energy-consuming during the initialization of the process and quite small, applicable in simple apartments, electric cars and other electric vehicles from motorcycles to ocean liners and airplanes on electric power. Unfortunately, neither Rosatom nor Roskosmos are interested in my ideas - the budget is being sawn, time is running out, salaries are increasing and wages are increasing ... rackets are slowly flying in ...
  20. 0
    15 August 2023 02: 50
    Oh no shit! And not nuclear, but immediately thermonuclear! Well, what happened with polyethylene, it should also work with thermonuclear
  21. 0
    16 September 2023 00: 56
    I'm laughing for some reason. Why only thermonuclear? They would have swung right at the gravitsap, one xep, there are no real technologies and are not expected in the next 50 years
  22. 0
    1 November 2023 01: 02
    Theory in its bare form. Not a single working element of the concept is expected in the near future. And even more so in a compact form. Bullshit!