Six-barreled 106-mm anti-tank self-propelled artillery M50 Ontos

36
Six-barreled 106-mm anti-tank self-propelled artillery M50 Ontos

Before the advent of anti-tank guided missile systems, recoilless rifles were one of the main means of combating armored vehicles on the battlefield. Such artillery systems in the post-war period were developed and put into service in the USA, Great Britain, the USSR and China.

The main advantages of recoilless guns are their lower weight and relatively low cost compared to classic anti-tank guns. At the same time, recoilless guns lost in range and accuracy of fire and rate of fire, and the jet stream ejected from the rear nozzle and compensating for recoil poses a great danger to personnel and unarmored military equipment.



American 75-106 mm recoilless guns, operated in the 1950s-1970s


In the 1950s and 1970s, the US military operated the 75mm M20 and 106mm M40 recoilless rifles.


75 mm M20 recoilless rifle in Korea

At the time of its appearance, the 75-mm M20 recoilless rifle in the infantry units of the American army was an anti-tank weapon of the company and battalion level and, with a mass of 52 kg, could be transported to the battlefield by calculation forces. Most often, the gun barrel was mounted on a Browning M1917A1 machine gun of 7,62 mm caliber.

For the M20, there was a wide range of ammunition, including a cumulative projectile with armor penetration up to 100 mm, fragmentation projectile, smoke projectile and buckshot. An interesting feature of the M20 ammunition was that the shells had ready-made rifling on the leading belts, which, when loaded, were combined with the rifling of the gun barrel. Effective firing range tanks did not exceed 500 m, the maximum firing range of a high-explosive fragmentation projectile reached 6500 m.

In connection with the mass production of heavy tanks IS-3 and medium T-54 in the USSR in 1953, the 106-mm M40 recoilless rifle with an anti-tank cumulative projectile firing range of 1350 m (effective about 900 m) entered service. The maximum firing range of an 18,25-kilogram high-explosive fragmentation projectile is 6800 m. The armor penetration of the first cumulative projectiles was within 350 mm, later this figure was increased to 470 mm.


106 mm M40 recoilless gun

The rotary and lifting mechanisms of the gun are equipped with manual drives. The carriage is equipped with three sliding beds, one of which is equipped with a wheel, and the other two with folding handles. For sighting on top of the gun, a 12,7 mm M8 sighting machine gun is installed, which uses special ammunition for firing with ballistics corresponding to the trajectory of a 106 mm HEAT projectile. At the distance of an aimed shot, fire was opened from a sighting machine gun with the corresponding guidance adjustment. The trajectory of the 12,7 mm bullet was controlled thanks to a well-marked tracer. When a bullet hit its target, it exploded, giving a bright flash and a cloud of smoke.


Taking into account the total length of 3404 mm and the weight of the 209 kg gun, the M40 gun was much more often installed on various vehicles compared to earlier American recoilless ones. Most often these were light off-road vehicles.


Sometimes these recoilless rifles were armed with various tracked and wheeled transporters. So, in Vietnam, the American army used the M113 armored personnel carrier with 106-mm recoilless rifles as a fire support vehicle.

106 mm anti-tank self-propelled artillery M50 Ontos


The most famous combat vehicle armed with M40 recoilless rifles was the American M50 Ontos anti-tank self-propelled artillery mount. Initially, the Ontos was conceived as a highly mobile tank destroyer that could be transported by military transport aircraft that the US Air Force had in the 1950s. If necessary, the rapid transfer of such anti-tank weapons to the required area was envisaged.


Tank Destroyer M50 Ontos

The anti-tank self-propelled guns, in addition to the unusual name (“Ontos” is translated from Greek as “Thing” or “Object”), had weapons atypical for vehicles of this purpose - six 106-mm M40A1C recoilless guns located outside on the sides of the turret, four 12,7-mm sighting (ammunition load 90 rounds) and one 7,62-mm machine gun Browning 1919A4 (ammunition load 1000 rounds) for self-defense against infantry and firing at air targets.


This weapon option was chosen in connection with the desire to provide the ability to fire several aimed shots in a short time. Since it took about 40 seconds to load the M20 gun, Allis Chalmers decided to increase the rate of fire by using six barrels. After a volley at the enemy, the self-propelled gun had to move to a safe place, where the guns were reloaded. The total ammunition load was 18 unitary 106-mm rounds.


Tank Destroyer M50 Ontos, rear view

To reduce the cost in the design of the tank destroyer M50 Ontos, automobile units were widely used: a 6-cylinder gasoline engine General Motors Model 302 with a capacity of 145 hp. With. from a 2,5-ton army truck and an Allison hydromechanical transmission that transmits torque to the tracks. Some American authors write that in 1963, in order to increase mobility, some of the machines were equipped with a more powerful eight-cylinder Chrysler HT-361 engine and new type caterpillars, the mileage of which was increased from 2400 km to 4500 km. The upgraded sample received the designation M50A1.

The suspension system was designed in such a way that all its elements were located outside the car body.


On each side there were four road wheels connected via balancers to torsion shafts attached to the sides of the hull. The drive wheels were located in front. Track width - 508 mm.

In front of the car were located the engine-transmission and control compartment. The hull was welded from 13 mm armor, which provided reliable protection against armor-piercing rifle-caliber bullets. The upper frontal sheet had a slope of 71°. The bottom is made of 6 mm armor plate.

A small rotating turret was located in the upper part of the hull. The six-barreled gun mount was symmetrically mounted on a horizontal shaft passed through the turret, thereby ensuring the vertical guidance of the guns. The guidance mechanisms of the gun mount had manual drives. The angle of horizontal guidance of the guns was 40 ° to the right and left of the longitudinal axis of the machine.


The elevation angle of the guns reached +20°, the angle of declination -10°. The two guns could be quickly removed from the vehicle to fire from the ground.

When equipped, the M50 Ontos tank destroyer weighed 8,63 tons and was very compact: length - 3828 mm, width - 2900 mm, height - 2133 mm. On the chassis, the car could accelerate to 48 km / h. The machine had a low specific pressure, which ensured good patency on soft soils.


Cruising on the highway - up to 240 km. The height of the overcome wall reached 0,76 m, the width of the ditch - 1,37 m. Without preparation, it was possible to force a water barrier 0,6 m deep, after preparation - 1,3 m deep.

The crew consisted of a driver, loader and commander, who also served as a gunner. Personal weapons The crew were M3A1 submachine guns of 11,43 mm caliber.

Testing, series production and commissioning


Preliminary testing of the first prototype, known as the T165, began in 1951. In 1955, after the construction and testing of various models, a modified version of the T165E2 received official approval from the military, after which Allis Chalmers began mass production of this machine. On the basis of "Ontos" it was supposed to create a series of tracked combat vehicles: a self-propelled mortar, a self-propelled anti-aircraft gun and a light armored personnel carrier. A self-propelled gun project was also developed, armed with two revolver-loading recoilless rifles, which made it possible to fire several shots at a high pace and eliminated the need to leave the vehicle to reload. However, these plans were not implemented.

Initially, the contract provided for the construction of 1000 self-propelled guns. But the army command refused to accept the Ontos into service. The order came from the Marine Corps, which needed a light, passable tank destroyer that did not take up much space on landing craft and was suitable for landing on an unprepared coast.


Serial construction of tank destroyers M50 was carried out in 1955-1957. In total, taking into account pre-production copies, 321 cars were produced. The first unit equipped with such self-propelled guns was recognized as combat ready in 1956.

"Ontos" entered the anti-tank battalions, which included three companies of three fire platoons. The platoons were equipped with "heavy" and "light" squads. There were three combat vehicles in the "heavy" section, and two in the "light" section.

Service and participation in hostilities


In the first years after being put into service, the USMC command worked out the methodology for the combat use of the Ontos, landing and interaction of anti-tank battalions with other units. In the course of maneuvers and training firing, it became clear that a self-propelled gun armed with recoilless rifles was outdated even at the stage of adoption and had little chance of winning in a direct collision with modern tanks. There were some favorable options when operating against heavy enemy armored vehicles from an ambush. In addition to fighting tanks, recoilless multi-barreled self-propelled guns were considered as a means of fire support for infantry. But in this case, the effective firing range of a high-explosive fragmentation projectile at a bunker-type point target did not exceed 2700 m.

For the first time in combat, the Ontos were involved in 1965 during Operation Power Pack, undertaken to overthrow the left-wing government of the Dominican Republic that had come to power.

After the US Marines landed in South Vietnam, the upgraded M50A1 self-propelled guns took an active part in the hostilities from early 1965 to mid-1969. Foreign sources claim that at the end of 1965 there were 65 Ontos in Vietnam. Of these, 45 vehicles were part of the 3rd anti-tank battalion and a smaller number - in the 1st anti-tank battalion of the USMC. Several self-propelled guns were also on board the landing craft on standby, to reinforce the landing units if necessary.


SAU M50A1 in Vietnam

The memoirs of US Marines who fought in Southeast Asia in the late 1960s say that the command of the USMC largely underestimated the combat potential of the Ontos in terms of their ability to fight enemy infantry.

Self-propelled guns turned out to be especially effective when repelling Viet Cong attacks in the jungle, when firing was carried out with grape-shot shells that mowed everything in their path at a distance of up to 400 m. At the same time, the crews showed miracles of ingenuity, placing up to 30 artillery shots inside the hull. High-explosive fragmentation shells, which were used to destroy manpower and destroy light field fortifications, also showed themselves well.


At the initial stage of the American presence in South Vietnam, light self-propelled guns were actively used to escort transport convoys, defend remote bases, and protect airfields. For operations at night, some of the machines were equipped with night vision devices and searchlights.


Sometimes the Ontos were used as nomadic guns, harassing enemy positions. Approaching the distance of the shot, they fired shells from the guns and quickly left the firing position. In this case, the gunner fired shots in turn or two at a time from guns spaced on different sides of the tower. Making a simultaneous salvo from six guns at once was usually avoided, since in this case everything around was clouded with smoke and dust.

Quite predictably, light self-propelled guns turned out to be very vulnerable to hand-held anti-tank grenade launchers and suffered greatly when mines exploded. After several vehicles were lost during raids to block partisan supply routes, the command limited their scope to the protection of stationary objects, where they were considered as a means of fire reinforcement.


Shortly before the end of their career, several self-propelled guns were disarmed and converted into bulldozers used to clear field helipads, and into light tractors that pulled vehicles stuck on dirt roads during the rainy season.

Completion of career


After three years of combat service in Vietnam, it became difficult for the crews and mechanics of the maintenance platoons to keep the Ontos in working order. Especially a lot of complaints caused the state of the chassis. The wear and tear of machines and the lack of spare parts affected. By March 1969, most of the self-propelled guns were considered to be of limited combat readiness, were placed in stationary firing positions and were used as fixed firing points.

In May 1969, the surviving M50A1s were loaded onto ships and sent to California. The anti-tank battalions were disbanded, the crews were distributed to other units.


By that time, ATGMs had already appeared in the US armed forces, and self-propelled guns armed with recoilless guns were considered hopelessly outdated. In 1970, the Marine Corps decommissioned all Ontos. Most of the vehicles were cut into metal, armor was cut off from several self-propelled guns and used as tractors at airfields and storage bases, where they survived until the mid-1970s.
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    14 July 2023 04: 42
    An interesting article about a little-known self-propelled gun! good
    Until recently, the Japanese had light tracked tank destroyers armed with two 106-mm recoilless rifles in reserve.
    1. +7
      14 July 2023 12: 05
      Quote: Tucan
      Until recently, the Japanese had light tracked tank destroyers armed with two 106-mm recoilless rifles in reserve.


      Until 2007, the Japan Ground Self-Defense Force kept Type 60 tank destroyers in storage, which was armed with two 106-mm recoilless rifles.

      Serial production of Type 60 was carried out by Komatsu from 1960 to 1979, a total of 223 machines were produced.
      1. +2
        14 July 2023 23: 11
        Quote: Bongo
        .

        hi
        I remembered a joke from Yuri Nikulin:
        - Four trunks, and the whole sky in parrots wink
      2. +4
        14 July 2023 23: 27
        Quote: Bongo
        A self-propelled gun project was also developed, armed with two recoilless guns with revolver loading

        Around the same time, the British were developing a similar machine.
        One of the versions of the tank destroyer FV4401
        Created as part of the Prodigal program to develop an airborne anti-tank self-propelled gun.
        Loading mechanism: revolver type, 7 shots per gun.
        They didn't go either.



      3. +4
        14 July 2023 23: 45
        Quote: Bongo
        75 mm M20 recoilless rifle in Korea

        In Korea, they started with the 57mm M18.
        There they immediately showed little effectiveness against our T-34s.
        I had to urgently deliver more powerful M20


        A US Army soldier firing an M18A1.
        9th Infantry Regiment, 2nd Infantry Division
        Korea, September 5, 1951
      4. +3
        15 July 2023 14: 52
        Thanks to the author! Interesting as always! hi
  2. +7
    14 July 2023 05: 49
    Very interesting article. Thank!
  3. 0
    14 July 2023 06: 03
    Maybe it’s also now standing on some kind of MTLB, BSh from S-10 or BMP-1, both have a low silhouette, high maneuverability and a turntable, on which you can install a dozen SPG-9 and let them "nightmare" the cutting edge ... )))
    1. 0
      14 July 2023 08: 27
      So MT-LB with NURS aviation units exist and are used both on the basis of the Strela air defense system and on the MT-LB itself.
      1. 0
        19 November 2023 02: 13
        MT-12 is simply cool, believe me! And LNG-9 only affects...the ears of the calculation. Terrible thunder. Without earplugs - guaranteed concussion for the gunner. MT-12 is indeed a Rapier. Noble class, grace and power.
  4. +6
    14 July 2023 06: 44
    During the Dominican episode, perhaps the only use in the entire career of the Ontos took place for their intended purpose - as tank destroyers. The victims were two Dominican Landsverk L-60 tanks (Swedish-made) and one AMX-13 (French-made).
  5. +4
    14 July 2023 07: 24
    To be honest, I learned about this stray (M50A1) from the article, although in the school in the 70s there was a theoretical acquaintance with military equipment and small arms of a potential enemy. I did not meet in the "Foreign Military Bulletin" of that time either. Thanks to the author.
    1. +3
      14 July 2023 10: 15
      You have to play tanks, there is something else feel
  6. +5
    14 July 2023 13: 40
    In the 1950-1970s, the US military operated 75 mm M20 and 106 mm M40 recoilless

    As well as 90 mm M67 and 105 mm M27.



    1. +6
      14 July 2023 14: 01
      Quote from Frettaskyrandi
      As well as 90 mm M67 and 105 mm M27.

      Greetings!
      I pay tribute to your erudition, but in this case I cannot agree. No.
      90 mm M67 is grenade launcherlike Carl Gustav. Concerning recoilless gun M27, then I'm sure you know very well its fate, and why the 106 mm M40 recoilless rifle appeared, which also actually had a 105 mm caliber.
      1. +1
        14 July 2023 23: 13
        90 mm M67 is a grenade launcher, like the "Karl Gustav"

        Both the M67 and Carl Gustaf, according to the classification adopted in the American and European armies, are considered a recoilless rifle and are called, respectively, a recoilless rifle, in contrast to a grenade launcher (rocket launcher), because recoil compensation is carried out by partial removal of propellant gases through a special nozzle.
        As for the M27 recoilless gun, I'm sure you know very well its fate

        I know, but this fate does not change the fact that these weapons were in service and were used during the period under review.
        1. +2
          15 July 2023 00: 31
          Quote from Frettaskyrandi
          Both the M67 and Carl Gustaf, according to the classification adopted in the American and European armies, are considered a recoilless rifle and are called, respectively, a recoilless rifle, in contrast to a grenade launcher (rocket launcher), because recoil compensation is carried out by partial removal of propellant gases through a special nozzle.

          Well, yes, well, yes ... like on these samples:




          Quote from Frettaskyrandi
          I know, but this fate does not change the fact that these weapons were in service and were used during the period under review.

          I'll quote myself:
          In the 1950s and 1970s, the US military operated the 75mm M20 and 106mm M40 recoilless rifles.

          The 105-mm M27 gun was used very limitedly in the early 50s, i.e. not in the specified period (1950-1970s).
          1. 0
            15 July 2023 02: 01
            Wow it's like. That is, you can only mention samples that have been in operation continuously for thirty years - the fifties, sixties and seventies?
            Then the M20 is also not suitable. It was no longer used in the USA in 1970.
            1. +2
              15 July 2023 06: 23
              Quote from Frettaskyrandi
              Wow it's like. That is, you can only mention samples that have been in operation continuously for thirty years - the fifties, sixties and seventies?
              Then the M20 is also not suitable. It was no longer used in the USA in 1970.

              In the 1970s, the United States transferred the M20 to friendly countries. At a minimum, these recoilless ones were in storage.
              1. 0
                15 July 2023 08: 14
                In the 1970s, the United States transferred the M20 to friendly countries. At a minimum, these recoilless ones were in storage.

                They were in warehouses until the early 1990s, as they were used to fight avalanches in the USA and Canada. Together with the M 27, by the way. By the beginning of the 90s, this ammunition was over and they began to use the M 40 to fight avalanches, the last of which was decommissioned in 2003.
                1. 0
                  16 July 2023 01: 55
                  Quote from Frettaskyrandi
                  They were in warehouses until the early 1990s, as they were used to fight avalanches in the USA and Canada.

                  I'm talking about army warehouses. I am aware of the use of recoilless in anti-avalanche service and the problems associated with this.
          2. 0
            15 July 2023 02: 02
            The 105 mm M27 gun was used very limitedly in the early 50s

            The entire Korean War is intense.
            1. +1
              15 July 2023 06: 22
              Quote from Frettaskyrandi
              The entire Korean War is intense.

              Share the source?
              1. 0
                15 July 2023 08: 48
                Share the source?


                US Recoilless Rifle 105mm M27. Part of the Infantry Antiarmor Weapon Series
                70 pages, 56 illustrations, in an 8½ x 11 inch format
                ISBN: 1-886848-08-4.
                There was even a new instruction published in 1951.

                1. 0
                  16 July 2023 01: 53
                  Good morning! I'm already in the morning!
                  Quote from Frettaskyrandi
                  US Recoilless Rifle 105mm M27. Part of the Infantry Antiarmor Weapon Series
                  70 pages, 56 illustrations, in an 8½ x 11 inch format
                  ISBN: 1-886848-08-4.
                  There was even a new instruction published in 1951.

                  Thank you, of course, but I would prefer more accessible, albeit English, but still online sources of information.
                  This I mean that there is a lot of data on the use of 57 and 75 mm recoilless in Korea, but about 105 mm, especially considering that it was quickly withdrawn from service and released a little, I did not come across anything.
          3. 0
            15 July 2023 02: 25
            Well, yes, well, yes ... like on these samples:

            These samples are just classified as an antitank grenade launcher, because a solid propellant rocket engine is used and not a propellant charge.
            1. +2
              15 July 2023 06: 22
              Quote from Frettaskyrandi
              These samples are just classified as an antitank grenade launcher, because a solid propellant rocket engine is used and not a propellant charge.

              SPG-9 too?
              1. +1
                15 July 2023 08: 19
                SPG-9 too

                LNG - 9 I missed. No, LNG -9 is a recoilless gun, which is natural.
  7. +5
    14 July 2023 13: 51
    In 1970, the Marine Corps decommissioned all Ontos. Most of the vehicles were cut into metal, armor was cut off from several self-propelled guns and used as tractors at airfields and storage bases, where they survived until the mid-1970s.

    Meanwhile, the idea is alive and "Ontos" continues its service, although it has changed its appearance a little, but you can recognize it.



    The Venezuelan army decided that it was too early to write off the M40A1 and the chassis of the AMX-13 tank and created the Ontos anti-tank self-propelled guns.
    1. +5
      14 July 2023 14: 02
      Quote from Frettaskyrandi
      The Venezuelan army decided that it was too early to write off the M40A1 and the chassis of the AMX-13 tank and created the Ontos anti-tank self-propelled guns.

      Thank you, I didn’t know!
      How many of these cars were built?
      1. +2
        14 July 2023 22: 35
        Unfortunately, I did not find such data. But judging by the fact that the car has already received a purely national designation Maisanta YZR, the process is moving forward.
    2. 0
      15 July 2023 21: 20
      Is that still a mortar in front? This is when they decided to cram everything that is possible
  8. +5
    14 July 2023 14: 31
    hi
    Interesting article!

    A little about Ontos from my grandfather, who knows firsthand that the shutter must be closed well:

    https://youtu.be/8ZE7pELAY1U

    Making a simultaneous salvo from six guns at once was usually avoided, since in this case everything around was clouded with smoke and dust.


    https://youtu.be/J0rCsfTBN7U?t=5
    1. Alf
      +4
      14 July 2023 20: 48
      The sound of the engine resembles the operation of a jigsaw.
  9. +2
    15 July 2023 13: 20
    Her view, of course, is fantastic - in the spirit of the era. And if this car appeared not in the early 50s, but in the late 60s, then perhaps it would have turned out to be a good carrier of the TOW complex, and then it could have stayed afloat for several decades.
    1. 0
      5 August 2023 01: 31
      Quite possible. The Bundes developed about the same "freak" only in the 70s. With recoilless, of course, they no longer fooled around.