Missile complex MRC Typhon confirmed its characteristics

20
Missile complex MRC Typhon confirmed its characteristics
Transfer of the first MRC complex to the customer, December 2022


In the interests of the US ground forces, a promising medium-range mobile missile system MRC Typhon is being created. A prototype of this type is already being tested and demonstrates its capabilities. In the last days of June, another test launch of the rocket took place, and according to its results, the complex was called fully combat-ready. Now the Pentagon and contractors can begin the next phase of the program.



Progress made


The Mid-Range Capability program (“Medium-Range Capabilities”) started at the end of the tenth years. On the basis of ready-made components, it was required to create a land-based missile system with enhanced combat characteristics. In November 2020, Lockheed Martin received a contract for the full development of such a complex, followed by the construction and testing of a prototype. All work was required to be completed by the end of calendar year 2023.

In October 2021, Lockheed Martin and the army revealed the appearance of the future complex for the first time. Also announced its official name - Typhon ("Typhon"). Shortly thereafter, the construction of the components of the first battery of the complex, intended for testing, began. It was handed over to the customer in early December 2022.

Over the next few weeks, the customer mastered the received equipment and, together with the contractor, prepared it for testing. At the beginning of 2023 (the exact date is not known), the experienced Typhoon performed its first rocket launch. This event used the SM-6 ammunition, a ship-based air defense anti-aircraft missile capable of operating as a quasi-ballistic missile. The complex and its rocket solved the task, and the tests were considered successful.

On June 28, the press service of the army reported that a new test had taken place the day before. This time, the MRC complex launched the Tomahawk cruise missile. Preparation for launch and rocket firing were carried out in a regular manner using a battery command post.


Typhon in the early stages of testing, January 2023 BOC command post in the foreground followed by launchers

Thus, over the past six months, the Typhon experimental complex has demonstrated its ability to use two types of ready-made missiles, and also confirmed the design characteristics. According to the US Army, the complex showed its full combat readiness. Now the missile force reinforcement program can move on to the next stage.

Plans for the future


Back in 2020-21 The Pentagon revealed the main plans for the creation and deployment of new ground-based missile systems, incl. promising MRC product. So, due to a reasonable reduction in the complexity of this project, it was planned to accelerate the development and appearance of finished products in combat units.

According to plans for 2021, the first Typhon battery should be tested in 2022-23. No later than September 2023, it will be deployed in the troops and put on experimental duty. Full service will begin later - by the beginning of Q2 FY2024. (by the beginning of the calendar year 2024) Thus, the US Army has six months to master new equipment.

Earlier, specialized media, citing sources in the Pentagon, reported that the ground forces needed at least five divisions of MRC complexes. Each such connection may include three batteries or more. Accordingly, in the medium term, Lockheed Martin will have to build and transfer to the troops at least 15 Typhon battery packs. In the future, it is possible to expand plans with an increase in the number of units and equipment in them.

It should be recalled that at present several promising systems with different characteristics and features are being developed for the American missile forces at once. In such a weapon system, the MRC product occupies a middle position - between operational-tactical missiles and strategic hypersonic systems. At the same time, it is considered a priority, because. combines a certain ease of development and construction with high combat performance.


June trials

On finished components


The purpose of the MRC project was to create a promising ground-to-ground missile system with enhanced combat capabilities. It was required to use the maximum number of ready-made units and components, incl. serial missiles. With the help of various types of ammunition, the future Typhon was supposed to solve the problems of operational-tactical complexes and medium-range systems.

The MRC Typhon battery kit includes the minimum set of tools necessary for self-combat work. It includes a unified command post for missile forces and artillery of the BOC type with a support vehicle, four launchers, as well as transport and loading systems.

The command post, launchers and transport units are built on three-axle semi-trailers and are moved using tractors of the HEMTT family. The BOC support vehicle is made on a lighter chassis and trailer. The Typhon battery can navigate on its own along predetermined routes. To perform shooting, it is necessary to place it in a prepared position, followed by deployment and connection of systems.

The MRC launcher is a rigid-hulled trailer carrying a lifting package for four transport and launch containers. The package is unified with the Mk 41 ship installation and can accept TPK with different types of missiles. Start is made from a vertical position.

At the moment, only two existing missiles are integrated into the Typhon complex, but in the future it is expected to expand the ammunition load with a corresponding change in combat capabilities. The MRC performs the functions of an operational-tactical missile system with the help of the ship's SM-6 missile defense system. As part of the Typhon, it operates in quasi-ballistic missile mode and cannot attack air targets. The flight range in this mode reaches 460 km. In the final section of the trajectory, targeting is provided with the help of an active radar seeker.


To hit targets at ranges of about 1800 km, it is proposed to use the Tomahawk cruise missile. This ammunition retains its configuration and must work according to standard algorithms.

In the future, MRC may receive other ammunition. Like the Tomahawk or SM-6, they are also borrowed from the Navy. At the same time, the further development of missile weapons fleet can affect Typhon as well. So, after 2024, a new version of the SM-6 rocket, Block IB, will be integrated into the complex. Due to the new solid-propellant engine, such a product will show a range of up to 700-740 km. In the future, the introduction of shipborne hypersonic missiles is not ruled out. Of course, if they are created and put into service.

New tasks


Thus, the Mid-Range Capability / Tyhon program is generally moving forward successfully. In a timely manner, its developers managed to create the required equipment and conduct the necessary tests. Based on the results of real launches, the customer called the new missile system ready for operation.

According to well-known plans, now the experienced Typhon will go into experimental military operation, the purpose of which is to additionally test equipment and gain experience by personnel. In addition, the developer company will have to prepare a production line for the production of serial complexes. The Pentagon needs at least 15 complexes, including a large number of various tools and products.

It should be recalled that the Pentagon planned to complete the development of several missile systems by the end of 2023 and put them on duty. In the case of the MRC Typhon, this problem is generally solved. However, the creation of a full-fledged combat-ready grouping of such complexes is still a matter of the distant future.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    5 July 2023 04: 57
    Judging by the aggressive policy pursued by the United States after the unilateral withdrawal from the ABM Treaty, hundreds of universal Mk 41 launchers in Romania, the Czech Republic and Poland have long been replaced by SM-6 Tomahawks, and now also Typhoons. I wonder if their radars work at all in the European missile defense system? Although there may be combined solutions, some launchers with SM-6 missiles for symbolic protection against retaliation, everything else is for ground-to-ground attack missiles.
    1. +1
      5 July 2023 19: 12
      Quote: scientist
      Judging by the aggressive policy pursued by the United States after the unilateral withdrawal from the ABM Treaty, hundreds of universal Mk 41 launchers in Romania, the Czech Republic and Poland have long been replaced by SM-6 Tomahawks, and now also Typhoons. I wonder if their radars work at all in the European missile defense system? Although there may be combined solutions, some launchers with SM-6 missiles for symbolic protection against retaliation, everything else is for ground-to-ground attack missiles.

      What's in the Czech Republic?
      Where are the hundreds of VPUs from?
      Only 48 launchers in fact.
      What are you talking nonsense and just a lie?
      Do you even understand what you are writing about?
      I see that it is not.
      The presence of 48 launchers for Tomahawks scares this ridiculous "scientist".
      it's nothing at all.
      If you know that in the US Navy, 4 SSGNs are in service and on alert, with 154 Tamahawks each.
      154 on each.
      616 in total for 4 nuclear submarines.
      Which can actually be launched from any direction in the European part of the Russian Federation.
      616 Tamahawks.

      And these 48 TLUs at Escher will be filled only according to the original plan. Only missile defense.
      And nothing else
      For these missiles are an order of magnitude more important in their tasks than Tomahawks.
      But he does not know this, because
  2. +1
    5 July 2023 05: 08
    As I understand it, a certain trend has begun in the unification and camouflage of the launcher in the format and dimensions of a civilian semi-trailer (truck). In principle, if this thing is not painted green, and an ordinary tractor is attached, then it will not be easy to recognize such a launcher from afar. Something like our Caliber-K, which is in the format of a standard container
    1. -5
      5 July 2023 05: 52
      Quote from Jafar
      Something like our Caliber-K, which is in the format of a standard container

      Which was originally positioned as a weapon for sabotage. But where are the mattresses?
      Although I note that it’s possible to paint, only a painted tank doesn’t look like a civilian jeep. I personally see a container REMINDING a 40-footer, it’s impossible to say exactly in size - because it is attached to a healthy fool, such as the one that we carry strategists, and the dimensions can be great bigger. And a tractor with additional gadgets, such as an additional power plant, as I understand it? It is VERY difficult to confuse him with a long-range
      PiSi: here on the diagram it is indicated as part of the TZM complex. It’s just interesting - HOW can you launch a rocket from a container so that the container doesn’t fucking fall apart?
  3. 0
    5 July 2023 05: 53
    It should be recalled that the Pentagon planned to complete the development of several missile systems by the end of 2023 and put them on duty. In the case of the MRC Typhon, thisthe problem is generally solved. However, the creation of a full-fledged combat-ready grouping of such complexes instill remains a matter of the distant future.

    All is well, beautiful marquise, All is well as never before
    ...
    She burned down with the stable, But otherwise, beautiful marquise, Everything is fine, everything is fine!

    I don’t know how anyone, but personally, these advertising-translated articles have already "fed me"
  4. KCA
    -6
    5 July 2023 06: 06
    An excellent solution, the Ax costs 1.4 lyama, SM-6 3.3 lyama, somehow I doubt that more than one installation for testing in a real combat situation on the outskirts and even small NATO members will be supplied
  5. +6
    5 July 2023 06: 10
    a fairly obvious and cheap solution to develop is to use a naval vertical launch installation with the entire range of ammunition in a ground-based complex
  6. +3
    5 July 2023 06: 22
    It can be added to the article that two more components of the new American land "triad" are the Lockheed Martin PrSM (Precise Strike Missile) operational-tactical missile system, to replace ATACMS, with 2 missiles in a cell, with a range of 500 and 1000 km in the future, and medium-range missile system LRHW (Dark Eagle) with a range of 3000 and as much as 17 max at maximum.
    The order of deployment is first Typhons, then Prsm-ki, somewhere by 2025, this pair will reach operational readiness. The last one is the Dark Eagle (if, of course, they do such a thing) which they are also going to use for the fleet.
    1. +3
      5 July 2023 08: 27
      Quote: Belisarius
      The last one is the Dark Eagle (if, of course, they can do this) which they are also going to use for the fleet.

      It shouldn't be a problem at all. Classic BRSD. This is bad for us.
      1. +1
        5 July 2023 11: 16
        Quote from cold wind
        It shouldn't be a problem at all. Classic BRSD.

        Well, I don’t know, to provide Mach 17, maneuvering and accuracy .... Difficulties may not be with a rocket, but with a controlled maneuverable hypersonic warhead. However, maybe they just slightly overestimated the characteristics for advertising purposes.
        1. +2
          5 July 2023 11: 33
          Mach 17 (generally not a very correct term, a warhead flies where sound does not propagate) is the norm for an IRBM, limited maneuvering in near space is also a solved problem, accuracy has not been an issue since the 70s. Generally more marketing now. But that doesn't make the missile any less dangerous. Simplicity will enable mass production, this is dangerous and not the high parameters of a single product.
    2. -8
      5 July 2023 08: 37
      Quote: Belisarius
      Deployment Order - First

      ... and all three - without guidance systems, which, as they did not exist in the 70s, have not appeared until now. Well, the question is dumb, schA uzzhe - they will do everything, and Prism, and Enema, and Populism. In 3D animation.
      But in reality, it turns out that only one of the two hypersonic programs has long remained, and even its theoretical goals have changed - now the target for hypersonic missiles is fixed and unprotected (soft) targets. That is, in addition to the lack of guidance, they cannot also shove warheads there. And the order - yes, that's exactly what it will be. After the rain on Thursday, as soon as the cancer whistles
    3. +1
      5 July 2023 08: 56
      Dark Eagle has already begun to deploy. The first is in February of this year.
      1. +1
        5 July 2023 11: 21
        Quote: Commissar Kitten
        Dark Eagle has already begun to deploy. The first is in February of this year.

        More from the end of 2021 - https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/42652/the-army-just-got-its-hands-on-its-first-dark-eagle-hypersonic-missile- launchers
        But these are not yet real missiles and are far from operational readiness. They promised to begin deployment in 2023, but the launch in March was postponed.
  7. +1
    5 July 2023 10: 18
    And how much, I wonder, was spent on this development? And most importantly: how much will one such complex cost the US Army?
    1. +5
      5 July 2023 10: 37
      Quote: Yaroslav the Wise
      how much, I wonder, was spent on this development?

      Inexpensive. All components have long been mastered. Just the best American traditions.
      1. -3
        5 July 2023 12: 04
        Quote: Negro
        Inexpensive. All components have long been mastered. Just the best American traditions.

        Best American Traditions - it's to take a ready-made project, slightly trick it - and call it a new project, double the price. After that, get a check on your head - and, rubbing the receptacles crazy greed, return part of the money.
        Remember the story about the cost of Hornets and Essexes? wink
        3. But the coolest thing is that. that by 1943, even rich Americans began to go nuts from the amounts that private shipyards were breaking from them. Therefore, they conducted a pricing review and suggested that the shipyards return the excess profits "before it starts." And the shipyards had to agree.

        As a result of the above:
        - in 1939, the contract price of AB Hornet was $37,3 million, and the price of AB Essex was $40 million;
        - and in 1943 the contract price of AB "Hornet" was 26,8 million dollars, and the price of AB "Essex" - 30,6 million dollars.
        © Evgeny Pinak
        1. +2
          5 July 2023 17: 43
          Quote: Alexey RA
          Best American Traditions

          These are not the best.

          But yes, as usual, the budget will not master itself.

          Knox! King!
          Where are the shells?
  8. 0
    5 July 2023 23: 13
    They create it as an answer to our Iskander, but with different characteristics. The same goals, the approach is different. It’s not a bad complex, and most importantly, everything has already been mastered. finalize and hit on the same bridges and the critical structure of Ukraine. Only here is the price of the issue.
  9. 0
    7 July 2023 13: 21
    I have a very big question, why are American medium-range missiles launched that way, vertically, and is it any wonder that the chassis of their vehicles is so strong that they are not afraid of being hit? What is the rationale for such a design?