Guns KS-19 for Ukrainian artillery

26
Guns KS-19 for Ukrainian artillery
KS-19 guns at the Ukrainian base, March 2023. Photo by Readovka


Since February last year, Ukrainian artillery has suffered heavy losses in armaments. They were partially replenished by the supply of foreign guns, but this equipment also falls into the list of losses. In such circumstances, the Kiev regime resorts to all available measures. In particular, it was recently decided to remove from storage morally and physically obsolete KS-19 anti-aircraft guns. Apparently, they want to return the maximum possible number of such products to operation.



Removed from storage


The land forces of Ukraine inherited a wide range of field artillery from the Soviet army. Almost all types of guns have been used in combat since 2014. At the same time, KS-19 anti-aircraft guns, for unknown reasons, remained in storage until recently. According to available data, the Ukrainian army had approx. 180 such products.

The return of KS-19 to service became known at the end of March 2023. A short video appeared on Ukrainian resources, filmed at a certain military facility in an unknown location. 11 KS-19 products were captured in the frame in an unsatisfactory technical condition: with partially crumbling paint, with traces of rust and flat carriage wheels.

Apparently, the guns were removed from storage and delivered to a repair base for restoration and return to service. However, a voice-over claimed that the shown KS-19s were trophies and previously belonged to the Russian army. Now they are planning to use them against the alleged former owners. It is obvious that such statements are not true.


Other guns from storage. Readovka Photos

Judging by the apparent condition, 11 KS-19 guns from storage needed not only standard re-mothballing, but also minor or even medium repairs. However, carrying out the necessary procedures and work made it possible to return the guns to operation and send them to the combat zone to reinforce the artillery units and the ground forces as a whole.

Guns at the front


That is exactly what happened. Already in early April, the first evidence of the presence of Ukrainian KS-19s in the combat zone appeared. Photos and videos were published showing the work with such weapons. So, in one of the videos, a cannon was towed along a dirt road using one of the regular trucks of the Ukrainian army.

Another video showed combat work or training firing. The place and time of their holding were not reported. A battery of four KS-19s, exposed to direct fire, hit the lens. They also showed the shot of several guns. Where and with what result they shot was not specified.

Subsequently, new information about the operation of the Ukrainian KS-19 appeared in various sources. Thus, according to some, the use of guns at the front was made possible thanks to foreign aid. An unnamed foreign country or countries donated 100-mm unitary ammunition for an old anti-aircraft gun to the Kyiv regime.


Carriage of the KS-19 gun in the combat zone, March-April 2023. Photo by Telegram / Dambiev

A few days ago, Rossiyskaya Gazeta reported that obsolete guns entered service with the 241st brigade of the territorial defense of Kyiv. The number of products in this compound and plans for further deployment are still unknown.

Learning Issues


Apparently, the Ukrainian repair structures were not limited to only 11 known guns and continued to restore the existing KS-19s. There are about 170-180 guns in stock, and they will try to repair and return to service the maximum number of them - of course, if their technical condition allows.

Meanwhile, the command is preparing to receive such materiel. On June 27, the Beregini hacker group published a curious document obtained from the information networks of the Kyiv regime. As it turned out, in June, the Ukrainian Research Institute of Missile Forces and Artillery prepared and published a manual on the operation of the 100-mm anti-aircraft gun KS-19.

"Methodical Help" was collected from fragments of several original documents from the fifties and sixties. From the manuals for operation, service and repair, they took the main parts, diagrams and drawings, supplemented them with firing tables and translated all this into Ukrainian. In this form, the new manual went to print and will now be distributed in artillery units.

The release of the “posibnik” indicates that the command is going to fully return the KS-19 guns to service. Despite the limited number, such products will allow re-equipping a certain number of units. Accordingly, personnel must be trained in the use of these weapons and provided with the necessary instructions.


Battery KS-19 in position. Photo Telegram / "Military correspondents of the Russian spring"

Technical features


KS-19 (GRAU index 52P-415) is a 100 mm towed anti-aircraft gun. It was developed in the second half of the forties and produced for about 10 years. During this time, more than 10 thousand guns were manufactured, both original and modernized versions. Production was discontinued due to the advent of more effective anti-aircraft missile systems. As the air defense was transferred to modern air defense systems, 100-mm guns were put into reserve.

The artillery system is made on a two-axle towed carriage with jacks. The total length of the product in the stowed position is more than 9,2 m. Weight is approx. 9,4 tons. The speed of transportation on the highway is limited to 35 km / h. Deployment in position takes several minutes. Calculation - 7 people.

The gun has a 100 mm rifled barrel with a length of 60,7 klb. A slotted muzzle brake is provided; using a semi-automatic shutter. The carriage design gives elevation angles up to +85° and provides circular horizontal guidance. Rate of fire - 14-15 rds / min. The maximum range of a shot at a ground target, depending on the type of projectile, exceeds 21 km, the reach in height is 15,4 km.

The KS-19 cannon could use both existing 100-mm unitary rounds and several new types of ammunition. The ammunition included anti-aircraft shells, fragmentation and high-explosive fragmentation, armor-piercing various actions, etc. High-explosive fragmentation shells had a mass of up to 15,6-16 kg and carried no more than 1,4-1,7 kg of explosive. The most advanced armor-piercing at a distance of 1 km could penetrate at least 180 mm of homogeneous armor.

Doubtful prospects


The use of KS-19 guns in the original anti-aircraft role has not made any sense for a long time. The Kiev regime uses such guns as part of field artillery to fire at ground targets. At the same time, the products of the KS-19 cannot claim the title of the most effective or powerful Ukrainian weapons, and are also not without drawbacks.


The guns are firing. Photo Telegram / "Military correspondents of the Russian spring"

In general, the KS-19 is capable of complementing other field guns and acting as a howitzer or direct fire cannon. Tabular firing characteristics allow her to hit a number of different targets, up to light armored vehicles. When properly applied, this weapon can complement systems of a larger caliber and solve the assigned fire missions. However, the joint use of systems of different calibers can make it difficult to organize combat work.

There are a number of disadvantages. First of all, this is the moral and physical obsolescence of the guns available in Ukraine. The newest products of the KS-19 have already celebrated their 65th anniversary, and in addition, the condition of the guns from storage leaves much to be desired. All this does not contribute to obtaining high performance, and also leads to additional risks.

A big problem in the current environment is towed performance. It takes several minutes to leave the position after firing, and the gun runs the risk of being hit by return fire from artillery or other means. At the same time, the gun and its crew have minimal protection, which increases the risk of their being hit by any fire means.

rearmament attempts


Thus, the Kiev regime is still trying to restore the potential of its armed formations, incl. artillery. The fleet of guns available at the beginning of last year was almost completely destroyed, and supplies from abroad did not help make up for the losses incurred. Because of this, it is necessary to return morally and physically obsolete anti-aircraft guns to service.

The prospects for such a "rearmament" are generally clear. It will allow to equip a certain number of artillery units and extend their active existence. However, the use of towed systems leads to known risks, which are further exacerbated by the limited number of guns. Obviously, the KS-19 products will not be able to influence the overall situation and will only add to the list of Ukrainian losses.
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    29 June 2023 04: 19
    I’m wondering, but has anything been shot down on the front line of all these anti-aircraft guns? Well, at least to recapture the cost of the ammunition sent towards the target.
    And the question is not only about KS-19, but also for the rest of the mutants reactivated on both sides of the conflict.
    1. +2
      29 June 2023 05: 24
      Quote: Healthy Life Wizard
      I’m wondering, but has anything been shot down on the front line of all these anti-aircraft guns? Well, at least to recapture the cost of the ammunition sent towards the target.
      And the question is not only about KS-19, but also for the rest of the mutants reactivated on both sides of the conflict.

      What do you not understand from these words?

      The use of KS-19 guns in the original anti-aircraft role has not made any sense for a long time. The Kiev regime uses such guns as part of field artillery to fire at ground targets.

      The same applies to the use of S-60.
    2. +10
      29 June 2023 06: 32
      Quote: Wizard HLS
      I’m wondering, but has anything been shot down on the front line of all these anti-aircraft guns? Well, at least to recapture the cost of the ammunition sent towards the target.
      And the question is not only about KS-19, but also for the rest of the mutants reactivated on both sides of the conflict.

      So what? War for a long time. If the T-54, which are the same age as these guns, can be used, then why can't the COP? Especially if they can be installed on trucks.
      1. +3
        29 June 2023 07: 32
        There is only one question - where will they get suitable ammunition in the required quantity. Hail breaker or avalanche breaker as a whole showed themselves well ... in the war in Karabakh in 1991
        1. +10
          29 June 2023 09: 02
          Quote: Civil
          There is only one question - where will they get suitable ammunition in the required quantity. Hail breaker or avalanche breaker as a whole showed themselves well ... in the war in Karabakh in 1991

          This gun uses a shot unified with the D-10 tank gun and the towed field gun BS-3. And a lot of such ammunition was released.
  2. KCA
    0
    29 June 2023 04: 20
    Oh, how, but our all-propellers saw the D-1 somewhere and for a year now it’s been howling
    1. +3
      29 June 2023 17: 22
      D-1 began to be used because of its relatively low weight, even to the detriment of range. Fortunately, 152-mm shells continue to be a very serious argument.
  3. +17
    29 June 2023 04: 34
    Apparently, the author has big problems with the choice of topics, and he is forced to chew on the same thing several times. Ryabov had an article on the same topic at the end of March.

    Looks like an outright hack. negative
    1. 0
      29 June 2023 06: 51
      In all likelihood, yes. So I don’t think that the 105mm French howitzer is better. Perhaps the Ukrainians began to count pennies?
  4. +4
    29 June 2023 04: 51
    And also in the USSR there were KS-30 anti-aircraft guns of 130 mm caliber. In total, more than 700 pieces were manufactured. (Shirokorad)
  5. +3
    29 June 2023 07: 51
    Junk, junk, whatever you call it, but this is 100mm with a decent range and it can cause quite a few problems, even if it does not live long. It is clear that there is little use, but they pose a threat to the infantry.
  6. +2
    29 June 2023 08: 08
    She has ballistics, by the way, don't worry mom. Although on a 4-wheeled "cart" the weight for a 100-mm caliber is absolutely monstrous.
  7. -5
    29 June 2023 08: 15
    The Ukronazi regime on the verge of collapse, like its German predecessor, will scoop everything out of warehouses under a whisk to prolong the agony. Analogies. The Fuhrer flooded the Berlin subway - Ze blows up hydroelectric dams. Total mobilization with a difference of 80 years without comment. The tactics of scorched earth during the retreat is similar. I personally have no doubts about the explosion of nuclear power plant reactors. Well, to nightmare our borderlands from cannons with a rate of fire of 15 rounds per minute - that's what the doctor ordered (in the sense of Goebbels).
    1. +5
      29 June 2023 10: 35
      said a man with the nickname of a German commander, battleship and German infantry division in WWII ... laughing
  8. +5
    29 June 2023 11: 31
    long obsolete morally and physically anti-aircraft guns KS-19

    Morally, it can beat, but physically, these guns did not fire and are practically new. In addition, a large amount of ammunition for them should beat.
    Tabular firing characteristics allow her to hit a number of different targets, up to light armored vehicles.

    They can hit all tanks up to Leopards, Abrams and Armats with conventional HE or even better naval semi-armor-piercing ammunition at a long distance. Without a direct hit, there will be damage, and with a direct hit on the krish, there will be a catastrophic defeat for tanks.
    Light armored vehicles can be very effectively hit without a direct hit by both conventional HE and ammunition with a remote or radio viewer.
    1. -3
      29 June 2023 11: 49
      And you, "brothers", are happy to try, instantly put shells on the ukrofascists
      , I don’t even doubt it! Not good people with the letter T, corrupt!
  9. +6
    29 June 2023 12: 21
    For all its shortcomings, the KS-19 has one big plus - the flat trajectory of the projectile. EMNIP, they wrote about the MT-12 that the use of these guns in the NM as fire support weapons is due to the fact that when working at a distance of 5-6 km, their shells are not detected by the counter-battery radar (they go below the lower limit in height).
    1. 0
      29 June 2023 12: 54
      and it also seems to me that the rate of fire multiplied by the ballistics of the gun can be regarded as a plus, they fired 10-15 shots at a point and run, although there is already a minus - mobility is rather low, due to the towed option.
  10. +2
    29 June 2023 17: 15
    Somewhere already there was information about this earlier.
    In general, the most effective tool for the artillery of the Armed Forces of Ukraine turned out to be the "Universal Battery-Level Fire Control System UBLFDS."
    But whether Russian artillery was able to move beyond calculations on tablets and also equip towed artillery with guidance sensors is still a question.
  11. +3
    29 June 2023 18: 40
    Yes, generally speaking, a firing range of 21 km is a fairly significant argument in favor of using these guns. Given the use of reconnaissance drones, these guns may well destroy lightly armored vehicles from afar, for example. Infantry fighting vehicles, and self-propelled guns, armored personnel carriers. It can also fire on personnel. It's not such a useless tool. And as an anti-aircraft gun it can shoot down drones, incl. heavy, the same "Hunter", helicopters.
  12. +1
    29 June 2023 18: 46
    At one time, we abandoned light howitzers of 105 mm caliber because of the weak effect on entrenched infantry. And this is also a gun in which the angle of incidence of the projectile will be small, that is, less effective in terms of fragmentation than a howitzer.
    Like the T-54 tank, this is an excellent weapon for lack of anything better, with the difference that the T-54 will be much more resistant to counter-battery fire.
  13. -1
    30 June 2023 06: 39
    Quote: Aron Zaavi
    Especially if they can be installed on trucks.

    With a truck it is doubtful, rather on MT-LB. The rapier is put up.
  14. +1
    30 June 2023 12: 05
    I myself am not an artilleryman. But I think that this gun, after bringing it into working condition, will be an effective art tool. And if there are still competent hands...
    By the way, we also probably have a lot of such guns in our warehouses. You can also repair and send to the troops. And in their place in the warehouses put Mstu b. So that in the future there would be one type of weapon in the warehouses, unified with self-propelled guns.


    I have one question about this weapon.
    She has the ability to shoot vertically.
    Is it possible to use it for mounted shooting?
    And la mortar?))))
    1. +1
      30 June 2023 15: 46
      It is possible to shoot, but it is doubtful to hit. The longer the flight path, the more external factors affect the projectile. And here there will be an upper point of the trajectory in 15-20 kilometers.
  15. -1
    4 August 2023 22: 08
    Obviously, the KS-19 products will not be able to affect the overall situation and will only add to the list of Ukrainian losses.
    I think it's exactly the opposite. These products will be able to influence the overall situation and add to the list of Russian losses.
  16. +1
    1 October 2023 20: 29
    If we have such guns, then they should be given to students to be modified into robotic guns. What large design bureaus do not take on as small things, students will do for little money and with minimal expenditure of resources.
    .
    Create a design bureau at military schools, lure the best students of mechanical engineering and electronics universities there... Just where to find “Beria” for leadership, so that he himself does not take kickbacks and does not give to others. Well, Stalin, so as not to let “Lavrenty Palych” bury himself.